Slashdot Mirror


How an Ex-Cop Rigged McDonald's Monopoly Game and Stole Millions (thedailybeast.com)

An anonymous reader shares a report: In August 22, 2001, Jerome Jacobson, director of security for a subcontracting company called Simon Marketing, was arrested along with eight co-conspirators for orchestrating a massive scheme to defraud McDonald's Monopoly promotion out of more than $24 million. Jeff Maysh of The Daily Beast tells the inside story in 8,800 words. Between 1989 and 2001, "Uncle Jerry" used his position as the head of the McDonald's Monopoly account to steal winning "pieces" worth between $10,000 and $1 million. He proceeded to gift the pieces to family members and a growing network of associates -- which included "mobsters, psychics, strip club owners, convicts, drug traffickers, and even a family of Mormons" -- in exchange for a cut of the laundered winnings. A former police officer known for his attention to detail, Jacobson was personally responsible for overseeing the printing of paper game pieces, cutting out the winning tickets, and transporting them to McDonald's packaging factories throughout the country. Read the full story here.

44 of 102 comments (clear)

  1. Why is a new article about a 2001 arrest news? by MrMagooAZ · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I find myself wondering why this article is considered "news". Is there anything new here? This happened 18 years ago. What am I missing?

    1. Re:Why is a new article about a 2001 arrest news? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2

      Oh, I see. Let me start my Nintendo Gamecube to put me in the right context.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    2. Re:Why is a new article about a 2001 arrest news? by CyberLeader · · Score: 1

      Because those are the articles msmash seems to approve. I have no idea why he thinks this belongs on Slashdot.

      --

      Software Shouldn't Suck

      E-mail: frank at jacquette dot spamless com (remove the spamless!)

    3. Re:Why is a new article about a 2001 arrest news? by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      The major trial started 9/10/01, so alot of people overlooked it; FTA.

  2. Re:the best people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Whenever I see such an idiotic post I immediately think 'PopeRatzo'

  3. Re:Shame he got caught. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I don't think you are seeing this clearly. The clown didn't lose a penny, his customers who should have won with the stolen winning pieces did.

  4. Re:Shame he got caught. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny


    serves toxic, chemical-laden

    I too prefer my food to consist solely of photons, electrons, neutrons, neutrinos (when you can catch them!) and dark matter. None of these nasty "chemicals"!

  5. Updated Micky D's jingle by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

    He proceeded to gift the pieces to family members and a growing network of associates -- which included "mobsters, ... strip club owners, ..."

    Baa daa bop bah bada bing - they're lovin' it.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    1. Re:Updated Micky D's jingle by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      If you win a medium to large lottery prize, you can get cash for it, avoid taxes.

      'The mob' needs documented income, they love to buy winning tickets (and pay taxes). But be fucking careful. They'd love that winning ticket for free even more.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  6. Rigged? by nuckfuts · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Saying that he "rigged" the game makes the scheme sound more clever than it was. He simply stole the winning tickets.

    1. Re:Rigged? by evendiagram · · Score: 1
      I was expecting this to be an early example of using stats in fraud detection. Should have called it quits after the line

      The two men behind the camera were not from McDonald’s. They were undercover agents from the FBI. This was a McSting.

  7. Re:the best people by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 4, Funny

    A family of Mormons, not a family of morons.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  8. 8800 words is about X too many by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

    >> Jeff Maysh of The Daily Beast tells the inside story in 8,800 words.

    Um...the summary repeated this 17-year-old news in a lot fewer words than that. In other words, you suck, Jeff Maysh.

    >> In August 22, 2001

    Still, this is Slashdot, so you can't expect fully literate editors.

    1. Re:8800 words is about X too many by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Wikipedia tells the complete story here in 250 words.

  9. Re:Ex-Cop? by omnichad · · Score: 1

    They had a position of trust/authority and it possibly was an advantage or source of insider knowledge. Similar to President or ex-sysadmin.

  10. Re:OK I'm not the only one by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    Not me. I read it as "even a family of morans".

    I don't know why.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  11. Re:the best people by drinkypoo · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "A family of Mormons, not a family of morons."

    It's the angel Moroni, not the angel Mormoni...

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  12. Re:Ex-Cop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Being an ex-cop lent him an extra veneer of integrity that helped to get him promoted as top security person in charge of the promotion. In this position (as an earlier post notes) he stole the winning tickets and took a cut of the winnings. That he got away with it for so long, that the company wouldn't rotate people in that position as a matter of precaution is kind of interesting.

  13. Re:Shame he got caught. by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The scheme resulted in there being more winners than usual, because he assembled the winning pieces for them. And it happened without the apparent winners buying the usual amount of product, so the clown was not only robbed coming, but going as well.

    I give a shit, but those are the facts.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  14. I guess we shouldbn't be surprised.... by Type44Q · · Score: 1

    I guess we shouldn't be surprised that this meets Slashdot's definition of news.

    1. Re:I guess we shouldbn't be surprised.... by myth24601 · · Score: 1

      Remember when it was news for nerds and stuff that mattered?

      --
      No matter where you go, there you are.
    2. Re:I guess we shouldbn't be surprised.... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Don't worry they'll bring it into compliance by posting it again tomorrow or next week.

      Probably both.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  15. Re:Shame he got caught. by AvitarX · · Score: 1

    Well, at least one person doesn't bother to save the non instant win pieces (me), and I get an average of .25 pieces a year.

    So using my direct observation we can prove that side streaming winning sets directly to people has a 100% chance of increasing the odds a winning set will be found.

    --
    Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
  16. Re:Jerome Jacobson by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

    Jerome Jacobson Jingleheimer Schmidt,
    his name is my name too;
    whenever we go out,
    people always shout
    Jerome Jacobsom Jingleheimer Schmidt

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  17. Got greedy by Miser · · Score: 1

    Not condoning the behavior, but if he wouldn't have been so greedy, he may not have got caught. That's what usually catches the blatant thieves and launderers - they get greedy.

  18. "even a family of Mormons" by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

    Mormons are a despicable people, why is this a surprise.

    1. Re:"even a family of Mormons" by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      The Mormon mafia is a real thing.

      The Mormon church was founded by a grifting scammer, it has _always_ had a core of criminal scammers at the top.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    2. Re:"even a family of Mormons" by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

      Just like the Jews amirite?

      Oh wait, sweeping generalizations about people on the basis of their religious beliefs is what defines a bigot...
      I'm not a fan of Mormonism myself, but like any other group of humans, there are Mormons who are great people and Mormons who are shitty people.

      It's almost as though categorizing people upon any basis other than their individual behavior makes you a shitty person.

      They practice vigilante justice on rumor alone, facts aren't important nor even an attempt made to verify.
      They do this as a whole and can be grouped as one.

  19. Re: Shame he got caught. by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    Of course I did. We went to McDonald's every week-end!

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  20. Re:Shame he got caught. by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    heavy use of sodium chloride... in their drinks?

    you're kidding, right?

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  21. In other words... by paulpach · · Score: 1

    They have finally unmasked the hamburglar

  22. Re:the best people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    same thing. pests.

    super-applicable captcha: "incest"

  23. Re: Shame he got caught. by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    Well, at least you've still got your Beanie-Babies.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  24. One thing is always true.. by thexfile · · Score: 1

    Cops made the best criminels.

  25. Re:the best people by laie_techie · · Score: 2

    same thing. pests.

    super-applicable captcha: "incest"

    Is it time to invoke No True Scotsman?

    Joseph Smith Jr founded The Church of Christ 6 April 1830; he later renamed it to The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. After he was killed his followers broke into splinter groups. The largest group followed Brigham Young to what is now Utah and retained the name The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. There are more than 150 sects which claim Joseph Smith Jr as their founder. The LDS Church wants to distance itself from the splinter groups (which includes polygamous sects), and thus asks the media to use the term "Mormon" when referring to the LDS Church with HQ in SLC, Utah. In 1890 the LDS Church officially declared it would not sanction new polygamous marriages.

    Even when polygamy was practiced, incest was forbidden. In some instances two sisters shared the same husband, but that does not count as incest

  26. Fine with me! by DaMattster · · Score: 1

    When we look at the kinds of crimes that McDonald's perpetrates against like sub-poverty line wages, terrible quality food, and mistreatment of livestock that go into the food process, my hat is off to the ex-cop. Fuck McDonald's! Feel free to label this as troll or flamebait but I am sick of the wealthy and the elite beating people up in the name of crony capitalism. I personally would like to give this ex-cop a high five.

  27. Re:the best people by HornWumpus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You gotta give the Mormons credit. Revising their divinely revealed teachings in response to a US federal government threat.

    Most other religions would be afraid their followers would get suspicious.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  28. Where Are They Now? by X!0mbarg · · Score: 1

    Inquiring Minds Want To Know!

    Seriously though, does anyone have any more current info on this little scheme? I certainly haven't heard anything about this before, but I'm old, and may not remember this being news at the time.

  29. Re:the best people by laie_techie · · Score: 1

    You gotta give the Mormons credit. Revising their divinely revealed teachings in response to a US federal government threat.

    Most other religions would be afraid their followers would get suspicious.

    Firstly, the LDS Church did not revise divinely revealed teachings. Why have a living Prophet and open canon if nothing ever changes;) Regardless, the teachings regarding polygamy did not change. Ever since the Book of Mormon was published and the Church formally established (1830) it was taught that polygamy is an abomination unless required by the Lord. Orson Pratt recorded that Joseph Smith started teaching polygamy in 1831, but the time to practice it had not yet come. In 1835, the Church declared "Inasmuch as this Church of Christ has been reproached with the crime of fornication and polygamy, we declare that we believe that one man should have one wife, and one woman but one husband, except in the case of death, when either is at liberty to marry again. (1835 Edition of D&C 101:4). It was not until 1843 when Joseph Smith Jr received a revelation indicating he should practice polygamy.

    Responding to a US federal government threat would have meant stopping polygamy a lot earlier than 1890. The Morrill Anti-Bigamy Act of 1862 made polygamy illegal. Other acts ( Poland Act of 1874, Edmunds Act of 1882, Endmunds-Tucker Act of 1887) didn't cause the Church to stop practicing polygamy. Even after the Manifesto of 1890 (Official Declaration 1 in the Pearl of Great Price) men continued to cohabit with existing wives. The Second Manifesto (1905) clarified that anyone entering into a new polygamous relationship or even performing such a marriage would be excommunicated.

  30. Fuck that guy by MonteCarloMethod · · Score: 1

    I was a kid during this racket, a kid who loved the time of year when monopoly came around. I've never been much for McD's food, but I got a huge kick out of peeling the stickers off of cups and fries and whatnot. Of course I never won anything more than a free medium fry, but it makes me sad to think that someone was running this scheme during the years that my adolescent self loved the promotion.

  31. Re: McDonald's owes us? by Pascoea · · Score: 2

    Why? So every McDonald's patron gets a coupon for a free medium fry, the lawyers get $100M, and McD's raises their prices 5% to compensate? Thanks, I'll pass.

  32. Re:the best people by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Sure they did. Just because they're new profit (not a spelling mistake) is authorized by their rules to change things doesn't mean he's not changing previously 'revealed truth'.

    Right on schedule, their profit gets a new revelation.

    Dumb dumb dumb dumb...

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  33. Re:the best people by laie_techie · · Score: 1

    Dumb dumb dumb dumb...

    Do you really get your information about Mormonism from South Park???

  34. Re:the best people by laie_techie · · Score: 1

    Sorry, but I fail to see how my post qualifies as "troll". Couldn't you find the "-1 I don't agree but can't intelligently debate" moderation?