Slashdot Mirror


Sony's Mobile Business Is Shrinking Out of Existence (theverge.com)

The latest earnings report from Sony indicates the company's already tiny smartphone business has shrunk by almost half. "In the quarter ending in July 2018, Sony managed to sell only 2 million mobile devices, down 1.4 million from the same period in the proceeding year," reports The Verge. From the report: In its 2017 accounting year, Sony sold 13.5 million phones, and back in April its modest estimate for 2018 was 10 million, but now that's been revised down to 9 million. Anticipating it will make only $5.49 billion of mobile sales for the entire fiscal 2018, Sony is now in a close contest with HTC for the title of being the least relevant global Android device vendor. At least BlackBerry has its promise of uniquely secure phones and keyboards with actual, physical buttons on them. Sony's signature mobile feature in recent times has been an insistence on shipping massive bezels for way too long. It's important to note that while Sony's mobile business is hurting, Sony as a whole is in good financial health.

88 comments

  1. simple make a playstation phone/app by johnjones · · Score: 2, Interesting

    play to their strengths...

    They just need to make a app/phone that can play old playstation games and link via bluetooth as a controller for the PS4

    a standard screen (just HD for battery life) a HUGE battery combined with a awesome camera and they would have a winner
    having google playstore then a seperate app for playstation games would be a killer

    they tried previously but had no specific games/emulator so it became sidelined... Sony Ericsson Xperia Play lost out to the vita... kill the Vita and do a app/store

    1. Re:simple make a playstation phone/app by pete6677 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sony has never been good at playing to their strengths, despite having numerous strengths. I don't expect this to suddenly change.

    2. Re:simple make a playstation phone/app by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Informative

      they tried previously but had no specific games/emulator so it became sidelined...

      You have this 100% wrong. I have a SEMC Xperia Play and they had specific games/emulator. Specifically, they had a playstation emulator. Most (but not all) Playstation games will work with it, and there is a java-based tool for prepping them for the phone. They sold something like eight different games for the device, which you had to buy all over again for your phone even if you already had them for your Playstation, which is the actual reason the device failed in the marketplace.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:simple make a playstation phone/app by Spamalope · · Score: 3, Funny

      Strengths? So, make it require Sony Memorystick instead of SD, and use a proprietary interface to connect to anything - but one that's standard on Sony PCs. Then make sure the devices have the rootkit pre-installed.

      Their strengths do revovle around making an unworkable and expensive walled garden, right??

    4. Re:simple make a playstation phone/app by jools33 · · Score: 1

      I suspect the problem is with Sony internal politics, SEMC do not work so closely with the playstation division, each division must make profits and so the customer ends up paying for this (or in this case just going to their competitors).

    5. Re:simple make a playstation phone/app by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I suspect the problem is with Sony internal politics, SEMC do not work so closely with the playstation division, each division must make profits

      Yeah, but it still boggles the mind that it makes more sense to SCE[AJ] to make nothing by not selling old Playstation games than to make something by charging a small amount for them to be sold on a SEMC platform — especially since most of them will work without modification, and buying it for XPlay didn't let you run it on any other platform legally. It did include the full ISO image, but it's not like those were hard to come by through "other" means at the time, so that's irrelevant in my book.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:simple make a playstation phone/app by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Sony phones have been able to remote screen your PS4 for _years_. Clip on a controller.

      They have the phone with the world's best phone camera in it.

      What they don't have is any American carrier partners.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    7. Re:simple make a playstation phone/app by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like, sitting on their Minidisc tech and not allowing Minidisc drives in PCs. First the regular ones, then Hi-MD. It would have been a free-for-all for pirated music and movies and bootleg games and software, but what about royalties and sales on a billion drives and how many Minidiscs.

  2. Massive bezels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The fetishes of smartphone reviewers never made sense to me.

    1. Re:Massive bezels by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The fetishes of smartphone reviewers never made sense to me.

      Bribes from Apple explain a lot.

      As a member of a former Sony buying family, I can say with confidence - the problem is lack of bug fixes to the software. Massive show-stopping feature omissions which are never fixed is what drove us away.

      We do not care about bezels, notches, thinness etc. But we wont buy phones without:

      • dual SIM
      • Removable battery
      • removable SD card
      • availability of cases, screen protectors
      • standard headphone and charger connectivity

      OK, so its probably ten years since anyone in the family bought a Sony - we consumers remember being shafted for a long time

      If Sony (or anyone else) want to buy us back, then support for 3rd party OSes is the best bet, not because many will install one, but because it publically demonstrates abandoning the "we enjoy shafting our users" mentality.

      It may have escaped your attention, but very few phone users are suckers these days, because they have all had several phones before. (Apple users don't count - they have always had the same phone each time).

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    2. Re:Massive bezels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sony were great once. They had a good range of VIAO laptop that were sought after in the 2000's here in the uk but things started to turn downhill and quality slipped. My last SONY purchase were 2 Xperia phones (Wife and I) 2 years ago both of which were shit and we brought iPhones months later.

      SONY are slipping into the darkness.

    3. Re: Massive bezels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is exactly what i was thinking.

    4. Re:Massive bezels by b0bby · · Score: 1

      As a member of a former Sony buying family, I can say with confidence - the problem is lack of bug fixes to the software. Massive show-stopping feature omissions which are never fixed is what drove us away.

      I have an Xperia X, and in general I like it. Sony has even been pretty good about pushing out updates. But I agree with you, there seem to be more bugs than I'd like, and one reason I find myself loading the update as soon as they land is I hope that it'll fix my laggy camera app or stop Waze from crashing or fix the bluetooth connection or whatever the issue de jour is.

      I'll be getting a new phone soon, and it probably won't be a Sony.

    5. Re:Massive bezels by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Sony were great once. They had a good range of VIAO laptop that were sought after in the 2000's here in the uk

      VAIO laptops were flimsy AF and their driver support was second to everyone. They were garbage hardware with garbage support. What about that was popular in the UK?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:Massive bezels by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Xperia XZs (and successors) has all that except the removable battery, of course it's 'removable', everything is, just not easy.

      Also has the best phone camera available and ruggedized.

      They are rooted. Sony doesn't officially support it, but they haven't effectively locked them down.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  3. Good. by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

    I had a SEMC Xperia Play. Still have it, in fact. Sony promised that all Xperia devices shipping at that time would get ICS. Then they released ICS roms for literally every device BUT the Play. They claimed it would be too hard to do. Well, people on XDA-Developers got it working, more or less. Unfortunately, IIRC the Playstation emulator which was the primary purpose behind the phone only works on Gingerbread, although XDA-Devs may have solved that problem as well by now. The touch pad game controller support was also a little wonky.

    Since Sony has demonstrated that they are liars, I will not buy any more devices from them, and they cannot stop selling them soon enough for me.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since Sony has demonstrated that they are liars, I will not buy any more devices from them

      What took you so long? Sony lost most of us with the BMG copy protection root kit scandal back in 2005. They've been dead to me ever since. That incident was unforgivable. It seems that 13 years later nothing has changed at Sony. They're still practicing their lying, cheating and anti-consumer ways.

    2. Re: Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Large firms are made of many smaller units that do not necessarily talk to each other effectively. Thus an instance of bad behaviour may reflect one unit, not corporate policy as a whole. In the case of PS and phone integration, that's a classic cross unit failure.

      In other companies you see different business units creating overlapping products, or corporate buying in a company to provide a product, not realising that they already have one.

      In essence, don't ascribe overarching bad intentions when it might be a limited amount of bad intentions (or failure to understand something is bad) combined with a failure of corporate self-knowledge.

    3. Re: good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When did Sony invade the USA? I missed the news reports.

  4. What a disappointment by El+Cubano · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The Xperia Compact phones are the only decent size phones with decent specs. Larger phones are a colossal pain since dealing with the extra weight and size is not worth it when I don't use the phone to consume media, browse the web much (maybe when I am not right near a computer, but that is it), or spend the day on social media apps. In decreasing order of importance, I need a phone that: makes phone calls, lets me text, acts as a hotspot, has GPS/maps for navigation, and a browser for the occasional quick search on the go. I don't need a Galaxy whatever or a phone with a ~6.5 inch display for that.

    The Xperia Compact phones are a bit overpriced for what you get, but they are otherwise very high quality and nice to use. Every other phone I have seen with a ~4.5 inch display is rubbish (assuming you can even find a current year model, as that is getting to be more difficult), and every other decent phone nowadays is ~5.5 or larger.

    I really hope they manage to stick around since they are servicing a part of the market nobody else seems to be interested in servicing.

    1. Re: What a disappointment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is exactly it. Sony makes decent phones, they're just overpriced for what they are. Overpricing has always been Sony's biggest issue. I remember when mp3 players were first becoming a thing, Sony lost out because their walkmans were $200 over anything the competition was putting out. Other than game consoles I don't understand why Sony thinks that they don't have to actually compete in the open market. Luxury branding in electronics are pretty much dead, specs are the only thing that matters.

    2. Re:What a disappointment by Falconhell · · Score: 1

      I bought an Xperia Z3 for $120 new on eBay recently to use as a flight computer in a glider.
      Its a great unit.

    3. Re:What a disappointment by ftobin · · Score: 2

      I'm totally with you on the Xperia Compact. It has been a great small phone. It has been getting updates for more than two years beyond the release date, too!

    4. Re:What a disappointment by SeaFox · · Score: 3, Insightful

      >The Xperia Compact phones are a bit overpriced for what you get, but they are otherwise very high quality and nice to use. Every other phone I have seen with a ~4.5 inch display is rubbish (assuming you can even find a current year model, as that is getting to be more difficult), and every other decent phone nowadays is ~5.5 or larger.

      They're already screwing that up. Did you see the current-year's model? Increasing the screen size in a way nobody wants, increasing the weight, and removing the headphone jack.

    5. Re:What a disappointment by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      A bigger screen means a bigger phone. A bigger phone is a bigger battery. Which means longer life.

      If you just want to make calls, be a hotspot, and have GPS, get a flipphone. The battery lasts days.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    6. Re:What a disappointment by El+Cubano · · Score: 1

      If you just want to make calls, be a hotspot, and have GPS, get a flipphone. The battery lasts days.

      I usually get 5-7 days of battery life before I have to charge. Occasionally it will drop to 2-3 if I am on the road a lot using GPS and/or hotspot continually. I find that the smaller phone does just fine with the smaller batter. Those bigger phones with bigger batteries have to use it all to power the bigger screen.

    7. Re:What a disappointment by quantaman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The Xperia Compact phones are the only decent size phones with decent specs. Larger phones are a colossal pain since dealing with the extra weight and size is not worth it when I don't use the phone to consume media, browse the web much (maybe when I am not right near a computer, but that is it), or spend the day on social media apps. In decreasing order of importance, I need a phone that: makes phone calls, lets me text, acts as a hotspot, has GPS/maps for navigation, and a browser for the occasional quick search on the go. I don't need a Galaxy whatever or a phone with a ~6.5 inch display for that.

      The Xperia Compact phones are a bit overpriced for what you get, but they are otherwise very high quality and nice to use. Every other phone I have seen with a ~4.5 inch display is rubbish (assuming you can even find a current year model, as that is getting to be more difficult), and every other decent phone nowadays is ~5.5 or larger.

      I really hope they manage to stick around since they are servicing a part of the market nobody else seems to be interested in servicing.

      My Xperia has been losing touch sensitivity near the edge of the screen, but one-off anecdotes are hardly a basis on which to judge hardware quality.

      But I do agree the compact smartphone market is sorely under served.

      If I wanted a tablet I'd buy a tablet, I don't need a giant screen to read webpages or look at a map. I get why the giant phones exist, but I don't see why no one is interested in making compact smartphones.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    8. Re:What a disappointment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A bigger screen means a bigger phone. A bigger phone is a bigger battery. Which means longer life.

      If you just want to make calls, be a hotspot, and have GPS, get a flipphone. The battery lasts days.

      Bigger phone is also bigger screen, which means bigger battery drain, which diminishes the benefit of a bigger battery.

    9. Re:What a disappointment by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      The battery increases linearly with area. The screen energy usage increases more slowly than that.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    10. Re:What a disappointment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I get why the giant phones exist, but I don't see why no one is interested in making compact smartphones.

      ... because they can see that Sony mobile makes them AND Sony mobile isn't profitable, so it is clear the market for "high end small phone" is not enough to sustain a single company much less more?

    11. Re: What a disappointment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you not heard of Apple?

    12. Re: What a disappointment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Z3C had the worst build quality of any phone I've come across.
      * The screen detached and lifted off in the top right corner. This also broke the proximity sensor, making the phone always think it was held up to my face during calls, and therefore disabling all the buttons. Try ending a call without the on-screen buttons.
      * The small USB cover seals detach, and the cover stops fitting properly if you use it to charge the phone daily.
      * The smooth back glass meant that the phone would always slide on any smooth surface that wasn't perfectly level.
      * The back glass suddenly shattered into hundreds of pieces while the phone was lying on a flat surface. The glass still stayed in place, and looked kinda funky. But eventually the corners started to push in since the cracked glass had no strength.

      I won't buy a Sony phone again.

    13. Re: What a disappointment by DutchMasterKiller · · Score: 1

      This, and overheating for no reason. Z5c. Fell of settee, back glass shattered, had it replaced and couldn't use flash on the camera anymore as it created a green glow on the picture. Liked the size etc but never buy a Sony phone again. It slid of bedside table and back glass shattered again. I have ductaped the back now but it ended in the draw and bought a Redmi 4x ðY'

    14. Re:What a disappointment by Luckyo · · Score: 2

      Problem appears to be Asian markets, where phones below 5,5" will not sell. And phone companies sell more in China than anywhere else in the world.

    15. Re: What a disappointment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My wife and I both have Xperia and like them, but we both got refurbished ones (about $200) as that does the job. All they are missing are gyroscopes.

    16. Re: What a disappointment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For phone calls, Web, email, etc I'd be happy with a decent e-ink display if it significantly increased battery life and high light level reading. I don't tend to watch video on a tiny screen, or drive so fast e-ink and sat nav wouldn't work.

    17. Re: What a disappointment by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I'd be happy with a decent e-ink display

      You'll never get it - that is a sensible option. The phone industry does not do "sensible".

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    18. Re:What a disappointment by gshegosh · · Score: 1

      I was going to write exactly that. Sony has virtually cornered below-5-inches market segment. I loved my Z3 compact until its touchscreen failed after 3 years of use. I've just upgraded to XZ1 compact and keep loving the device. It's a perfect form factor for me, screen estate is enough and being just 720x1280 pixels it saves power. All phone's specs are decent, it has a great GPS, is fast, etc. I've searched high and low for another phone below 5 inches, but there are almost none. It would be bad luck if Sony got out of smartphone business :( On the other hand, XZ2 compact tries to cram 5-inch screen into previous dimensions and it makes it thiiick. So maybe they get lost, too. Which is sad. I guess I will have to buy 1 or 2 spare XZ1s ;)

    19. Re:What a disappointment by hadrianb · · Score: 1

      Yes, I completely agree with everything you wrote. Those are precisely the reasons why I have bought two Xperia Compact until now (an X Compact 2 years ago and an XZ2 Compact with SDM845 this year).

      While many people seem to like large smartphones and small laptops, I only use large laptops and small smartphones (small enough to fit comfortably in a shirt pocket).

      I am always looking for good small smartphones, with up to 5 inch screen size, but I was not able to find any acceptable alternative to Xperia Compact.

      I am using them for exactly the same activities listed by you, plus a few high-resolution photos & movies from time to time.

      I do not use Google services, I do not have a Google account, but I use only the applications which came with the phones plus a few others written by myself and loaded on them with adb.

      Xperia Compact are perfectly adequate for that and I have been very content with them.

      Now I might buy another XZ2 Compact, to have a backup for the case when they would decide to discontinue the Compact line of products and no other vendor would offer something similar.

    20. Re:What a disappointment by qbast · · Score: 1

      I was replacing Z3 Compact about 3 months ago and decided to get XZ1 Compact instead of newest version. For the exact reasons you are listing (except for headphone jack that I don't use anyway)

    21. Re:What a disappointment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Best Buy still has XZ1's available on clearance: $359 for black and $400+ for white/. Been thinking about it, but recently got an acceptable LG Stylo 3+, and have gotten used to the 5.7" screen (for the most part - still awkward on occasion), and holding out for the 5" Purism open source phone early next year so I can dispense with Google altogether.

    22. Re:What a disappointment by Daetrin · · Score: 1

      I was going to say the same thing. I'm using a Sony Xperia X Compact right now and it's pretty good. I liked the 1st generation Moto X more, but Motorola decided to stop making good compact phones for some reason, so here i am.

      Also, i like headphone jacks and bezels on my phone. If Sony sticks with getting rid of those or just shuts down the mobile division entirely i'm going to be in a very unfortunate position when i need to get another phone =/

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    23. Re:What a disappointment by arth1 · · Score: 1

      They're already screwing that up. Did you see the current-year's model? Increasing the screen size in a way nobody wants, increasing the weight, and removing the headphone jack.

      Also, replacing the flat back that allowed you to use the phone while placed on a table with a bulging back that rolls in every direction, making the phone super-wobbly.

      I have an XZ1 Compact, and the hardware is great. It's my fourth Sony, after the W800, P and ZL. But the main reason I probably won't buy Sony again is that they remove existing features in new models.

      The W800 could play gapless music, had a replaceable battery, and a camera lens cover. The P didn't.
      The P had an RGBI display with much higher contrast that actually worked in sunlight, and hardware touch button areas for back/home/menu. The ZL didn't.
      The ZL had an IR port for use as a remote control, and support for NFC tags. The XZ1 didn't.

      This isn't just a phone thing, but seems to be the case for other Sony products too. The Playstations have been "dumbed down" several times, with removal of features like Linux. The second generation PSP lost the gorgeous OLED display. The successor, Vita, could not be hooked up to a TV. Then there's BD players which suddenly could not play Super Audio CDs like earlier models - now you have to buy a prosumer player to get that.

      In 50 years, Sony presumably will be selling bricks. Gorgeous bricks, but they won't be capable of actually doing anything. And they'll wobble.

    24. Re:What a disappointment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > A bigger screen means a bigger phone.
      > A bigger phone is a bigger battery.
      The screen scales in 2D. So does the battery, unless you make the phone thicker.

      > Which means longer life.
      Not if the screen dominates the power draw and the graphics/CPU is hit harder because your larger screen is higher res.

    25. Re: What a disappointment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple makes stuff for students and schoolgirls. I think it's funny to call them "luxury" when several percents of the world population buys iShits every year.

    26. Re:What a disappointment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Note that Sony has some kind of "Open OS" program and their phones ran Firefox OS and Jolla Sailfish! Such that I dreamed of getting a Z3 Compact, but I had to forget about it when Firefox OS dropped dead (and I though Firefox OS 2.5 final was about to come out)

      This means that Xperia XZ could possibly run the 5" Purism OS, unless that one will only work with hardware that runs on mainline linux kernel.

    27. Re: What a disappointment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll be fine with an amber OLED screen. Monochrome 1440x720 is only 1 million pixels, while color 2160x1080 is 7 million subpixels! Plus I won't have to worry that blue, red and green OLEDs age differently.
      There's a relatively new CPU core launched called Cortex-A55. It's probably fine. Cortex A7 and A53 were great already.
      I wouldn't want too much battery in fact, because it's heavy! Metal and glass are heavy too. In the meanwhile I'll do with a 70 grams phone that I use as a phone and has a headphone jack, thanks.

    28. Re: What a disappointment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like cars. I don't want AC, I don't want a tablet, I don't give a shit about anything, even power windows. The less there is, the less will fail, the less cost, the less weight. These things are not cars they're a mix of Xbox and waifu. And even then they don't think of putting in something useful instead like a fridge (where I can put my beers) or an ash tray.

  5. Try not crippling the camera if rooted by Miamicanes · · Score: 2

    Sony became dead to me as a phone manufacturer when they started permanently crippling the *camera* if you unlock the bootloader. Fuck Sony.

    1. Re:Try not crippling the camera if rooted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sony became dead to me when they sold me an expensive Android TV that can't even do basic stuff properly like changing channels or volume. Avoid their smart TVs. Fuck Sony.

    2. Re:Try not crippling the camera if rooted by gauntlet420 · · Score: 1

      Further to this, they also refuse to unlock the bootloader if the phone was originally carrier-locked, even if the phone is out of warranty. My Xperia Z2 is now a boat-anchor because of (1) a badly bloated stock O/S and (2) locked bootloader which cannot be unlocked other than by paying an exorbitant fee to the original carrier, with whom I don't even do business. I would have gladly kept using the phone were I able to run custom firmware on it. The camera was really good, as was the microphone - I could record clips at live shows and concerts and get *really* decent audio from this phone. My current G5 makes recordings which sound like messed-up McDonalds' drive-through-speakers.

    3. Re:Try not crippling the camera if rooted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, use it as an offline camera?

      Buying a carrier phone seems to be a huge mistake. It's so 2006.

    4. Re: Try not crippling the camera if rooted by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      Until VERY recently, it was often the only way to get a top-shelf Android phone capable of doing LTE in the US (esp. VoLTE & transparent wifi calling/sms).

  6. I have a Sony phone Z3C... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...which has great battery life even after 4 years of continuous heavy usage.

    The new versions of the phones come with no RAW support and a disabled fingerprint scanner so my next buy won't be a Sony phone.
    If I am paying top money for a phone I at least expect it have the same feature set as comparably priced phone regardless of whether of often I end up using those features.

    1. Re:I have a Sony phone Z3C... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      for the fingerprint sensor, you can flash it with a non-US firmware and you'll get it working. The hardware is there, but in the US it's disabled because some company (rumoured to be Apple?) has the US (but not international) patent for having a fingerprint sensor on the power button.

      You can find links to all that via google, or start off at a site like www.xperiablog.net

  7. problem was with android... by johnjones · · Score: 1

    Android created this problem and now has a solution...

    Android 8.0 re-architected the Android OS framework (in a project known as Treble) to make it easier, faster, and less costly for manufacturers to update devices to a new version of Android. In this new architecture, the HAL interface definition language (HIDL, pronounced "hide-l") specifies the interface between a HAL and its users, enabling the Android framework to be replaced without rebuilding the HALs.

    If they used Treble this problem would go away...

    1. Re:problem was with android... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That only replaces the GUI and upper layers of the stack, not the kernel or hardware drivers. Kinda like slapping another coat of paint on a building that's about to fall down. It's the Google way.

  8. Their phone camera sensor is still relevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sony sensors are still found in most phones nowadays. It is just sad that the xperia brand name is no longer great.

    1. Re:Their phone camera sensor is still relevant by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Their second tier sensors. To get their best sensor you have to buy a sony phone.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  9. "Sony's signature mobile feature..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I never have understand the craze around all-glass phones, or phones without borders, or trying to maximize glass. I loved the touchpad trackball buttons that were embedded in the bottom middle that let you navigate menus and select/click, i liked soft-keys for back/home/menu/etc, now what is there? I heard iphone or whatever even removed the audio jack or something. And these wacko charging systems that aren't mini USB. New phones force piles of preinstalled and difficult to remove junk on you. I haven't found a phone that's interesting or worth buying in like 8 years, try as I might with all the new stuff, it's all the same. I hate how phones have evolved, but at least sony phones have a space on the phone that's safe to hold without touching the screen. If they add some more kind of buttons it would look perfect to me.

    1. Re:"Sony's signature mobile feature..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I never have understand the craze around all-glass phones, or phones without borders, or trying to maximize glass.

      Apple wants to achieve something like this phone shown on The Expanse

      Notice the lack of bezels, buttons, headphone plug etc. Even the UI is a flat design like we are getting now

      Everyone else is just copying Apple so the entire market looks like shit

      I bought a Pixel 2 (not XL) so that I can have most of the features I want, top of the list being software support

      If it were possible to get a Note 8 with stock Android and updates like the Pixel 2 gets, I would have bought that instead because it still has all of the hardware you'd expect a phone to have

  10. Re: something shrinkin, something not shrinking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mind if you move those away? They're blocking the movie screen!

  11. Not bezels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shotty camera for way too long, and no camera2 api after 5-6 years of user complaints! If the Xperia dies, Sony, and Sony alone, is to blame.

  12. good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SONY if any of you remember infected North America (hello to my friendly American neighbors from the great white north).

    Given that they have attacked, without punishment, both our nations, I hope the fuckers fry in hell.

    Far as I'm concerned their corporate charter should have been yanked, the CEO and board members frog marched to prison. Why that didn't happen to them, to Monstanto, to Equifax, to Nestle, to...jesus I think I'd hit the text limit if I kept naming all these crap lords that keep screwing us and not a damned thing happens to them?

  13. Too much bloatware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My experience with a sony phone is that the build quality is very good, but the phones are riddled with bloatware that one cannot remove. No, this doesnt include "carrier bloatware" - I buy my phones direct.

    If they make a phone with stock android and without the crap, then ill be open to buying it. until then.....

  14. Great Product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In some ways similar to the blackberry great product, almost built too good. Everyone I know that buys Sony phones buys them because they're rock solid products, and keeps them way longer then the normal mobile phone vendor. I'd says most people keep them 3 years. ON PAR with Apple. Way better then LG and even Samsung. In part my guess about small numbers is they're on a different refresh cycle, generally I have swapped every 2 or three generations. The feature I like the most is that they are a multi day battery. Great for travel. And BTW the way for those that say that they don't like that they're slightly heavier, use it for a week and you'll realize that the weight is actually perfect. There is such a think as too lite.

  15. Re: something shrinkin, something not shrinking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lol /. readership

    you must be new here.

  16. Small phones great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sony's small - but still powerful - Compact phones are great.
    I suspect the problem is that people just keep using them, like I do, seeing no need to upgrade.

  17. I am not surprised... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a Sony phone, and Xperia A1, and it is horrible. The touchscreen has numerous issues and spots that do not pick up touchh very well all around the edges, including my home button. I would not recommend the phone to anyone and I will not buy another Sony phone after getting the runaround from support.

  18. Selling 10mil phones is still a lot by Nocturrne · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's sad that $5.49bil in sales is considered "small." In any other consumer electronics business, that's HUGE.

    1. Re:Selling 10mil phones is still a lot by HideyoshiJP · · Score: 1

      Modern business: "If you ain't first, you're last."

    2. Re:Selling 10mil phones is still a lot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that's also more than every Amiga computer sold ever, every year.

  19. Don't remove the jack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All Sony mobiles last year had a jack port and no Sony mobiles this year does, and sales are halved? Of course the have also been more lax on updates, in general making it had to remain a Sony mobile fan

  20. 100% right by johnjones · · Score: 1

    They had a playstation emulator with no exclusives i.e. no specific games
    They had no specific playstation emulator that emulated ps1 or ps2

    I had a Xperia Play given to me by google and the hardware was great however the software was terrible.

    1. Re:100% right by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      That's not what the word specific means.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:100% right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They had an emulator for their phones and prepared dozens of first party games (49 I think) only a few of which were actually released in the pilot program. They were all exclusives as they were all Sony first party games such as Crash Bandicoot. I have a list but it was a bunch of lame PS1 games that people only like for nostalgia's sake. Every game needed to be wrapped with the emulator though so as a package it included all of the changes required to get that one game on the phone. If the core emulator engine was updated, every game would also have to be updated and re-downloaded. Add to that the hardware for the phone which was developed in tandem with the PSPmini, another device no one asked for that arrived way too late because smartphones were emerging and getting larger and not smaller. The hardware would have relevant a few years earlier, but was rapidly becoming unnecessary despite Sony's need to capitalize on all of their development.

      What is most important to understand is that all of the emulator on a phone efforts were taking place at the same time as development of the VITA as well as their new , and both products had time-window problems. The VITA hardware was out of date by the time it was released and any demand for such a device was replaced by phones. But Sony makes electronics and had to capitalize on their supply so they kept releasing stupid shit like their memorystick for which they came up with yet another format for the VITA. VITA aside, their phone deal with Ericsson was a major blunder as they didn't understand the business before they got into it. They were like "phones are becoming big business, let's add phones to the hardware slate and get in on the market". So they tried to put together initiatives to push content on phones with zero knowledge of the industry and lifecycle. They thought it would work like consoles, but it doesn't because the hardware is a moving target with short 6 month iterations. In short, try developing a game for a console that will be obsolete in a year. Even if you have a rapid development cycle of a year, 6 months in and you are developing a game for last year's phones. So what do they do? Shift the focus to small phone games (aka PSminis).

      So they had all of these plans that rapidly changed and failed - PS1 emulation on the phone with special hardware to push their devices; a software framework they developed in getting their software to run on android called Zeus they wanted to license to manufacturers so game developers would develop for their phone as well as native android game development, both of which morphed into PSMobile over time which was just a rebranding of PSMinis (both of which quickly failed and went away) to try and get those apps on the phones as well as their consoles. It was just a way for Sony to try and get into another industry to capitalize on their content licenses and previous hardware development efforts.

      The model is you create a platform but have to seed it with (first party) content while you engage developers to create third party content who take years and multiple releases to achieve the potential of the hardware, just for it to be retired and the next gen comes out only to repeat again. When your game isn't taking advantage of the technology until at least the second or third release, and that's by expert in-house first party developers (think Uncharted 3), that's not a model for hardware and software frameworks that will be replaced in 1-2 years tops. I mean Sony had internal development of native games, development of games for their Zeus framework, development of the emulator for 1st party games with literally hundreds of games ready to be prepped for the phone emulator just as they were for the emulator on PS3 and PS4. PS2 games were much more difficult because the technical requirements were not as restrictive back then and dozens of hours would need to be spent by Sony on each title just to get it to run with no involvement from the owner/developer, plus they had a smarter alternative, which was PSNow,

  21. Sony is now in a close contest with HTC for the title of being the least relevant global Android device vendor.

    Er, well if you are global you are still kinda relevant, no?

    Is that something like "least athletic olympian"?

  22. Damn by qbast · · Score: 1

    Here goes the last source of compact, but full-spec phones. I guess I will hold to my XZ1 Compact for a long time.

    1. Re:Damn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's no evidence that Sony will quit selling phone or even that sales will shrink more. I also think it's doubtful Sony would abandon the market : they're a "we make everything" electronics company. They'd lose they brand if they didn't sell FM radios, cameras, TVs etc.
      You got scared by a tech journalist. Tech journalists say whatever please them :)

      Now, I'd sure like if they're scared by their own report and decide to add back a headphone jack to the XZ3. They invented little things with a headphone jack, the fuckers. If they're removing the headphone jack their should call their phones "Sony Ericsson Piece of Shit" not "Sony Xperia XZ".

  23. damn shame! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a damn shame.

    I went through many Sony phones (SonyEricsson K610 & P1i, Sony Xperia Z2 & Z5) and found them well built, with long battery life time and nice to use.

    While I'm very likely to keep my current Z5 until next September, the next one would have been a default to one of the new XZ(4?) series.
    Maybe me and similar-inclined people are just going too long (3-4y is too long?) without a refresh to keep their Mobile business side going?

    On a similar note, why are MediaMarkt/Saturn in Western Europe stopping to carry Sony phones? A damn shame.

  24. I'd be afraid to buy a Sony anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't even know that Sony sold phones. But their reputation is such that I assume they don't use real SD cards (you'd have to use some proprietary Sony memory stick instead), don't use USB (you'd have to use some weird proprietary Sony "lightning" cable), don't have headphone jacks (you'd have to use some weird proprietary Sony cable or wireless standard) and they can't talk to the cell networks without a special Sony-phone-compatible transceiver that you carry in your other pocket.

    I'm not exaggerating about my prejud--no wait--my postjudice. This is what Sony taught me. I'm not saying I couldn't be persuaded to buy stock or something like that, but as a user companies like Sony, Apple, and Nintendo always look like particularly bad choices that only a masochist would be able to tolerate. Not even Microsoft, the company best known for unusually-below-average quality, is as repulsive or automatic-No-getting.

  25. Sony HORRIBLE at Software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sony is HORRIBLE at software. Look at their PS OS from DAY ONE. Designed by engineers given a task list - minimal checklist - works and tested - beyond that, nothing.

  26. Could it be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could it be that being a media company is incompatible with making good un-crippled electronics.

  27. They abandoned their only niche by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They went from older style square phones with big bezels, headphone jacks etc to the polar opposite of that.

  28. That final paragraph is the kicker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have dealt with Sony's customer service. One of the things that keeps me going is wanting to see Sony die before I do.

  29. features by arunvk · · Score: 1

    I used sony z3 compact and really like the features. water proof, button placement, gimmicky camera features, solid body and regular updates until it lasted. it supposedly even had dock stand which I never saw though. wish they focused on long battery life, water proof, compact phones with flagship specs. they are capable of building an ecosystem with their products like apple or samsung is trying to do with their products.