Slashdot Mirror


Chromebooks May Get Apple Boot Camp-Like Windows 10 Dual Boot With 'Campfire' (xda-developers.com)

Google is reportedly working on a secret project to get Windows 10 running on Chromebooks. XDA Developers' Kieran Miyamoto reports on the latest developments surrounding "Campfire" -- the Chromebook equivalent of Apple's Boot Camp. From the report: Earlier this year, a mysterious project appeared on the Chromium Git. The Chrome OS developers had created a new firmware branch of the Google Pixelbook called eve-campfire and were working on a new "Alt OS mode" for this branch. We have since confirmed this Alt OS refers to Microsoft Windows 10 and found evidence that it wasn't just an internal project but intended for public release.

The developers have reworked the way in which they distribute updates to a rarely-used section of ROM on Chromebooks called RW_LEGACY. The RW_LEGACY section on a Chromebook's ROM traditionally gives users the ability to dual-boot into an alternative OS, but it is something of an afterthought during production and the section is rarely updated after a device leaves the factory. Now, with Campfire, Google will push signed updates to RW_LEGACY via the regular auto-update process, so firmware flashing won't be a concern for Joe Public. A recent commit for enabling Alt OS through crosh with a simple [alt_os enable] command indicates that it will be a fairly easy setup process from the user's end too.
We may expect to see the first demo of "Campfire" at Google's upcoming Pixel 3 launch event in October. Also, the report notes that the Google Pixelbook won't be the only Chromebook with Campfire support, citing "mentions of multiple 'campfire variants.'"

95 comments

  1. Run Windows under Linux by Tough+Love · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's the new thing, run Windows under Linux. Linux GPU virtualization is even good enough now to run AAA games in a VM. For most of what you do... browsing, social networking, viewing media, the experience is better under Linux now than Windows (e.g., you will never get an upgrade nag while watching a movie.) Not to mention Microsoft won't be spying on most of what you do, except of course for what runs in the VM. You want that to be less every month.

    Dual boot is out, sandboxing Windows is in.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    1. Re:Run Windows under Linux by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 0

      virtualization is even good enough now to run AAA games in a VM

      I've got a one of those AA-powered dongles that plugs into a TV component jack; it contains almost 100 8-bit games... But I've never heard of such a device that runs on AAA; it must be really compact. Where did you get it?

      At any rate, I'm not surprised that today's 64-bit PCs can easily handle emulating those games.

    2. Re:Run Windows under Linux by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      I'm not surprised that today's 64-bit PCs can easily handle emulating those games.

      Joke? Hard to tell. Anyway, GTA V on Arch Linux But much more straightforward on a straight up gaming rig, or what the enthusiasts are doing these days, kickass Linux Ryzen workstations that also rock high end games. BTW, 4K Displayport monitors are now really cheap, it's a great time to be a nerd.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    3. Re:Run Windows under Linux by blindseer · · Score: 2

      Dual boot is out, sandboxing Windows is in.

      I agree. I had setup my old Apple laptop to dual boot but then quickly realized that I'd need Windows for one thing and then MacOS for something else, usually at the same time. I could duplicate some functions on both so that I would not have to switch as often but then I'd have to find a way to keep those things synchronized. As soon as I was able to get a computer capable enough to run Windows in a VM and not have it compromise what I wanted to do in MacOS I never dual booted again. I just keep the Windows VM running in the background, and when I need Windows I can bring it full screen with a key combo. Switching back to MacOS is another key combo. If I want Linux then I can bring that up in a VM too, and now I have three operating systems running simultaneously on one computer and I'm able to switch between them all with a key combo.

      I used to dual boot my desktop computers all the time. Now I have a couple old computers I keep in Windows (which I honestly don't use often, at least not for work), one running Linux, and one running MacOS. Computers are so cheap and powerful now that I don't see much utility in dual booting any more. I'd think people with a need for more than one operating system would rather just get another computer or run what they need in a VM.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    4. Re:Run Windows under Linux by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      --You're doing it right. Why would you take a perfectly good Chromebook and sully it with a shite OS like Win10??

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    5. Re:Run Windows under Linux by vux984 · · Score: 1

      I'm actually really interested in giving this a go. I'm currently running Windows, with linux in virtualization, and it works very well.

      But I'd love to turn it inside out. I'm not sure where to start. What linux virtualization solution would you recommend for hosting Win10 + games with gpu virtualization?

      You say its 'good enough' to run AAA games. What sort of performance hit am I really facing? Do some games "just-not-work" What sort of stability loss am i looking at?

      I've got an i7 and a gtx1080, if that's a factor.

      What's the situation with multi-monitor support with something like this? And peripheral pass through? (usb headsets, usb controllers).

      If you can point me at a current resource that covers the setup and configuration and pitfall; that would be terrific.

    6. Re:Run Windows under Linux by Tough+Love · · Score: 5, Informative

      What linux virtualization solution would you recommend for hosting Win10 + games with gpu virtualization?

      I haven't tried it myself yet, but there are multiple reports of success with Ryzen+KVM+GPU+W10, for example this one.

      You say its 'good enough' to run AAA games. What sort of performance hit am I really facing?

      My impression is, very little. GPU virtualization gives the guest OS direct access to PCI registers, the overhead can get very close to zero. This report from 2014 shows overhead consistently less than 3%, often a lot less, and remarkably, sometimes actually faster in the VM. I'm not sure how that last one works.

      The big overhead for VMs tends not to be CPU, but memory consumption, make sure you have enough to make both host and guest comfortable. You should be fine with 16 GB, but more memory is always better, I'm liking how it feels with 32 GB. You will want a separate SSD for Windows, I think, but that's not going to break the bank.

      Do some games "just-not-work" What sort of stability loss am i looking at?

      Again, I'm not doing it myself right now (I have too many unplayed games already without a bunch more from Windows) but I see multiple reports of success with GTA 5 and I don't see any horror stories. My feeling is, your system as a whole will be more stable than it is now, and the VM+Windows part of it will be exactly as stable as now.

      I've got an i7 and a gtx1080, if that's a factor.

      Though I am a newly-minted Ryzen fanboy, I love Intel too except for their business practices. VM stability seems exactly the same for Intel and AMD. That is very cool. Number of VM crashes I had over the years on Intel or AMD: exactly zero, and I really thrash those VMs.

      What's the situation with multi-monitor support with something like this?

      Dunno. I'm waiting for your report. The question you ought to ask is, what's the situation with sharing the GPU between host and guest? Lots of active discussion on it. It's a thing, and multi-monitor passthrough is a thing.

      And peripheral pass through? (usb headsets, usb controllers).

      KVM has good USB passthrough, but for mouse and audio where performance is not an issue you probably want the virtual devices. There are a whole pile of online resources on it, e.g. here and the community is active. Mostly people seem to be using libvirt and virt-manager. I don't, I just read the man page and run KVM/QEMU from the command line. Do that only if you enjoy that kind of thing.

      There is a great and supportive community here.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    7. Re:Run Windows under Linux by PixetaledPikachu · · Score: 1

      I'm actually really interested in giving this a go. I'm currently running Windows, with linux in virtualization, and it works very well.

      But I'd love to turn it inside out. I'm not sure where to start. What linux virtualization solution would you recommend for hosting Win10 + games with gpu virtualization?

      You say its 'good enough' to run AAA games. What sort of performance hit am I really facing? Do some games "just-not-work" What sort of stability loss am i looking at?

      I've got an i7 and a gtx1080, if that's a factor.

      What's the situation with multi-monitor support with something like this? And peripheral pass through? (usb headsets, usb controllers).

      If you can point me at a current resource that covers the setup and configuration and pitfall; that would be terrific.

      Before plunging to GPU passtrough, you should test your games with Wine and DXVK. I've been playing No Man's Sky and Fallout 4 with Wine+DXVK in 1440p for a quite a while now, on i7-6700 and GTX1080. Expect some graphic glitch here and there

    8. Re:Run Windows under Linux by Tough+Love · · Score: 2

      Before plunging to GPU passtrough, you should test your games with Wine and DXVK. I've been playing No Man's Sky and Fallout 4 with Wine+DXVK in 1440p for a quite a while now, on i7-6700 and GTX1080. Expect some graphic glitch here and there

      Speaking of which, I installed Vulkan support on a Debian box a couple days ago and it came up without rebooting or even restarting X. How cool is that? Feeling lucky, I hunted down and installed the Unity Editor. Wow, it works great. Ran through all the tutorials in about 15 minutes, they are pathetic but you get some orientation. Basically, you learn to push the play button and you learn to drag and drop assets onto game objects.

      Jumped straight into a demo project and was confused for hours, but eventually broke through to the other side. This is just great, I will double plus unconditionally recommend it. At that point I immediately lost all interest in Windows gaming, why run them when you can make them? To be sure, I haven't got time or energy to make a commercial one, but talk about fun and bang for the buck: $0.00 down and $0.00 a month gets you endless entertainment. Now bringing my kid up to speed on it, who will quickly surpass me. I'll just have to be content being the scripting consultant. I have no problem at all sending $$$ in the general direction of Unity Technology, I just love what they did. Does anybody know about this?

      BTW, this seems to be Wine based because of all the dlls, and it also includes Mono as the scripting language, a convincing answer to the question "is Mono really compatible with C#?".

      Also ran a bunch of fan-made Linux Unreal engine demos, they are awesome, and Unreal may well be the better engine for the moment. I'm hardly complaining, Unity is way more than enough for me, and Unity Editor is said to be more intuitive. I will be able to weigh in on that myself UDK for Linux lands, which looks imminent.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    9. Re:Run Windows under Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree run cmd line for KVM/QEMU. There is a GUI which is... horrible, lacking most of the options, unintuitive (if you use vmware) for example it will force you to add a "pool" for the hard drive and cannot partition normally. clearly a server usage only.

      there is virsh which allow you to build your own config file for kvm in a whole new language just for that. It seemed a bit overkill for me.

      I recommand you get an old program called "aQEMU" which has a sane GUI, also that software allow you to retreive the command line it send to QEMU. So after building a working VM with the GUI you can go command line only with KVM / QEMU.

    10. Re:Run Windows under Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Linux GPU virtualization is even good enough now to run AAA games in a VM

      You forgot the critical "YMMV".

      I tried to get rid of Windows on a machine of mine that's hooked up to a projector, and whose job consists entirely of playing videos, and nothing else. No VM, just running native on the hardware. I tried a few distributions, including the latest version of Ubuntu as of this spring or so. The results were consistent: 480p was fine, 720p stuttered a lot, and 1080p was essentially unusable. The same videos playing back on the same hardware, but under Windows, with proper hardware acceleration, remained smooth throughout (I've been using it that way for years).

      Linux being what it is--if you're a n00b and everything works out of the box, then you're golden. But as soon as you need to add some driver, you're pretty much on your own. My box clearly wasn't doing any hardware acceleration under Linux, and I eventually had to revert back to Windows, as this machine's whole reason for existing is to play back video. I'm no dummy; I've been making a living as a software developer for over 20 years now--on Windows, going back to DOS, and I dabble with Linux every once in a while (my Linux VM host has at least 20 different distributions). A n00b would've given up after less than 10 minutes. I dedicated a weekend to it.

    11. Re:Run Windows under Linux by Rob+Y. · · Score: 1

      I'm sure that's all true. But if your need for Windows is only occasional, and the app in question runs okay under WINE, that might be an even better solution. Firing up WINE takes seconds, not minutes like Windows. And, of course, it's free. Won't work for everything, but I assume most everything you run on MacOS is native. So WINE might just be all the Windows you need.

      I use Wineskins to provide a single .app file with my custom win32 app and WINE bundled together and configured the way I want my users to see it. Sure, I suppose they'd prefer a native Mac version, but we really haven't gotten many requests for Mac support at all. So far the Mac users have been happy.

      --
      Posted from my Android phone. Oh, I can change this? There, that's better...
    12. Re:Run Windows under Linux by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for that. From some of the reading I've done since last night; yeah, 'sharing the GPU between host and guest' would be extremely desirable.

      Straight passthru would be pretty unpleasant. With the guest and host using different monitors (or switching between mutliple inputs on the same monitor. To me that's not much functionally better than running two computers and a kvm switch. (although it is cheaper of course than 2 PCs.)

      No, I'd definitely want the usual guest interface where I can run the guest in a window on the host (with reasonable performance), the usual desktop integration stuff (copy/paste support), mouse integration, with the option to switch the guest to full screen; and ideally at least when the guest is maximized that I'm getting solid enough performance to game on it.

      If I can't do that, I'm better of leaving it as-is for now. While many of the games I like are linux friendly; several are still windows only; and even the crossplatform ones often run better on windows... or so I've heard.

      So... yeah, for me, gpu sharing sounds like the path forward if i can get it working.

      For the other devices, the virtual devices may work well... or not. For example, i've got a mechanical logitech gaming keyboard and wireless mouse with the charging matt ... i guess all that has to work well with the linux host, which it may or may not... i see LogiGSK on github; and then there is a question of how that gets exposed to the guest.

      For audio im used to voice/mic going to the headset, while game audio goes through the speakers. As long as the VM sees those virtual audio devices and it doesn't introduce lag or echo etc it should be ok.

    13. Re:Run Windows under Linux by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Linux GPU virtualization is even good enough now to run AAA games in a VM.

      Last time I tried, even with pretty old games like IL-2, it sucked ass.

      I'm considering changing from CentOS to MInt so this might be a good time to give it another go.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    14. Re:Run Windows under Linux by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

      Heres all the links i have bookmarked. Im sure you can make it work. The performance is basically bare metal. you have to pull some fuckery with the conf file for nvidia cards or you get error 53 i believe, because theyre cocksuckers that want to milk everybody. but thats a different issue. i hope these work for you.

      https://www.pugetsystems.com/l...
      https://davidyat.es/2016/09/08...
      https://ubuntuforums.org/showt...
      https://lime-technology.com/fo...
      https://www.reddit.com/r/VFIO/...
      https://bufferoverflow.io/gpu-...
      http://vfio.blogspot.com/2015/...
      https://www.se7ensins.com/foru...
      https://forums.lime-technology...
      https://www.reddit.com/r/linux...
      http://blog.quindorian.org/201...

  2. That is SOOOOOOOOO STUPID! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As if Chromebooks were not useless enough already, adding Windows 10 will make them 100000 times worse!!!

    1. Re:That is SOOOOOOOOO STUPID! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well at least their keyboards work.

  3. Re:Proving Windows is best by Tough+Love · · Score: 5, Insightful

    you do not see much effort in reverse.

    Not true, actually. Microsoft now officially supports and invests a lot of money in running Linux both under the Windows desktop and in the cloud. I would go so far as to speculate that Microsoft now has more money invested in this than the sum total of all the work that went into Wine.

    But the elephant under the rug is, it's actually better to do it the other way: run Windows in a vm, that way you can keep your critical work and data entirely out of the hands of Microsoft. Microsoft knows this and now has a whole bunch of money invested in various efforts to forestall it. To be honest, it's hard to see that as a bad thing, it's the nearest thing to honest competition I have ever seen from that gang.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  4. Re:Proving Windows is best by Aighearach · · Score: 1

    Surely it is a good idea for the campfire to come into the windows. Expect people to bend over backwards to accommodate the effort to reverse, Mac. Despite the haters.

  5. what about android apps by FudRucker · · Score: 2

    did google ever get the chrome-os to run android apps like they said they would? i considered buying a chromebook on sale recently but i want to know if i can run android apps on it, mostly sdrtouch and utilize the sdrplay device driver for my SDR receiver, i have an rtl-sdr but the sdrplay is a much better receiver that makes the rtl-sdr look like a cheap knockoff sdr

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    1. Re:what about android apps by mykepredko · · Score: 1

      Apparently, there are claims that there are a number of Chromebooks that will run Android apps - I found this article: https://www.laptopmag.com/arti... that lists the Chromebooks Android works on and how to enable it.

      I have a number of Chromebooks (including some listed) and I haven't been able to get Google Play working. I'm expecting things to be better by the end of the year.

      YMMV

    2. Re:what about android apps by xeoron · · Score: 1

      It runs it on many newer Chromebooks. I have a old and new Chromebook Android Apps run on. Notes of interest: having a touchscreen & accelerometer makes a big different for some apps. Also, some IT network apps do not work right because it runs all network services beyond a sandbox proxy, so if you want to scan your network for devices, then it will only find itself. My Haswell Chromebook is much slower with Android Apps running on it with battery life draining twice as fast, while my i7 Pixelbook is blazingly fast and much longer battery life. If your Chromebook is being managed by Google's MDM, then it might be blocking Android Apps outright.

    3. Re:what about android apps by beamdriver · · Score: 1

      I have a Samsung Chromebook Plus and it runs Android apps pretty well.

      It's pretty well sandboxed though, so I don't know if it would be able to use the USB dongle you need for SDR.

    4. Re:what about android apps by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Yes, you can run Android apps on Chrome OS. The latest version adds better window support for Android apps too.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    5. Re:what about android apps by mykepredko · · Score: 1

      Thanx - I tried a couple of our Chromebooks today and found some that run Android apps.

      You definitely require a touchscreen and accelerometer.

  6. SameBoy emulates Game Boy Pocket by tepples · · Score: 1

    Game Boy Pocket runs on two AAA batteries, and mGBA and SameBoy emulate it.

    (In addition to the battery meaning, "AAA" means leading-edge, large-budget production values.)

  7. More google spyware. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do you even need a program like campfire to run Windows on a Chromebook?

    Because Google needs somewhere to install their spyware.

  8. What were they thinking? by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

    I was hoping my fellow computer scientists would have learned that just because we have the ability to do something doesn't mean that we should do it. HA! I'm just kidding, fuck it, let's put internet in some more shit! ;)

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
  9. Re:MODERATION IS CENSORSHIP by sgage · · Score: 1

    Hey, start your own right-wing tech site! Easy peasy! This is just Slashdot.

    Meanwhile, The US is a bit of a mess, the Republicans own all branches of the Federal Gov't, and Microsoft is doing quite well.

    So your whinging seems a tad disingenuous.

    Here's a free clue - don't start a post with 'this post will certainly be censored'. It's just so weird and passive-aggressive, and makes any point you might have subsequently made seem a bit weak, or dodgy. Just say your piece without the off-putting preamble.

    Your welcome.

  10. Re:MODERATION IS CENSORSHIP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe you should ponder why your opinions are so unpopular.

  11. Re:MODERATION IS CENSORSHIP by Z80a · · Score: 1

    It seems to be actually quite balanced in terms of left/right wing stuff. If it was an actual case of deep SJW infection, posts would be just deleted and users would be banned left and right until this was resetdotera.
    Of course, if you do shit like being pro actual nazism (as in extermination of jews, white ethnostate, all the package, not "things the far left disagre with") , you will get moderated down.

  12. Re:MODERATION IS CENSORSHIP by sgage · · Score: 1

    Hah!

    He was moderated right down to -1!

    Perhaps he will learn to be a bit more subtle.

  13. Great, if I can run Linux instead by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

    On at least one model of Chromebook you can load Libreboot and eliminate the risk of accidentally wiping out your Linux install. But it would be nice to be able to keep ChromeOS for those times when you want to interact with Google, and have a Linux install next to it which is completely free of them, and have it stay there like a good install should. I am not even slightly interested on running Windows 10 on the bare metal, like many other commenters in this discussion.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:Great, if I can run Linux instead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Posting from ubuntu running on a chromebook. It boots from a live image file stored on the SD card, so wiping incidents cannot happen. It boots into memory***, so I don't need to futz with the ssd at all (though I do have a swap file defined there). It runs all the time (current uptime is 67 days), and draws 2 watts in sleep mode. On the rare occasion when the dog knocks out the power cord and the battery drains it to shutdown levels, it can be rebooted from the bootable image file, and I spend maybe 30 minutes reconfiguring things to my liking - though most of that is automated script files now that I've done it a few times. The only downside is needing to backup useful files to persistent storage on the SD card. The upsides are that all the hardware works, the machine is always available and the full power of a linux desktop is available. And I am not subject to Google's whims.

      Then again, if ever I should wish to boot chromeOS, it is still there [I guess].

      *** Having 4G memory - using 2G zram swapfile and 8G ssd swapfile; typically having ~1G free to run stuff.

    2. Re:Great, if I can run Linux instead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can already run linux chromebooks. Well, on pixelbooks, at least. And only on the dev channel for now. But it works really well. Look up crostini.

  14. Re:Proving Windows is best by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

    How's that support for dual boot coming along?

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  15. Campfire? Copy Apple much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    As much as they keep saying how much better than Apple they are, they still copy apple.

    Gotta love it!

    1. Re:Campfire? Copy Apple much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Allegedly they employ some very clever people at Google but they seem to put the morons in charge.
      The relevant part of the Boot Camp name is the 'Boot', yet Google choose to focus on the 'Camp'. Presumably they'll claim that they're being satirical rather than fucking idiots.

  16. Re:Proving Windows is best by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    I just use vmplayer. I boot my Linux install from Windows, and I boot my Windows install from Linux. That way I have access to all of my applications regardless of which OS I'm running at the time. Well, almost all of them. I haven't got vmware graphics passthrough working at the same time I have the nVidia Linux binary driver installed. I haven't put any effort into that, though.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  17. The official name will be Fuck Shit Stack by bobstreo · · Score: 1
  18. Re:MODERATION IS CENSORSHIP by Z80a · · Score: 1

    Yep.
    People just don't seem to like extremes here.
    Seem several far left people getting the -1 treatment as well.
    Or maybe the extremes also tend to moderate more and like a MAD, they just self destruct and the moderate people are all that is left.

  19. What a great idea by slashmydots · · Score: 2

    If you want to know what hell is like, run Windows 10 on a celeron N4xxx or N3xxx CPU. They do sell these, mostly HP 15-series laptops btw so I know firsthand. That's the chip of choice for almost all chromebooks then you add the pathetically underperforming 32GB flash storage device (SSD is far too generous of a title) and 4GB of RAM and it take about 4 minutes to fully load and open and render one page in any web browser.

    1. Re: What a great idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First, tour numbers are way off. My n3000/n4000 celery stick nettops boot in half a minute tops. They're horrible for transcoding blurays and sluggish in windows updates, but are fine otherwise.

      What are you expecting for $200? I think a compact keyboard trackpad, 11.6" decent lcd 1366 screen, 4gb memory and tolerably slow emc/ssd at 64gb, plus case, PS, micros slot, usb3 port or two, bt, wifi, speakers and headphone jack, with a dual/quad core x64 low drain cpu is pretty good. I would prefer it had Ethernet built in too, but oh well, a $10 usb Ethernet adapter works.

      I just bought another one for $179 off Amazon. I use them as NUCs with built in UPS and kvm, netbootable (off usb) physical "VMs", etc.

      I'd love for them to make that form factor a little more upgradeable, 1080p screen, etc, but there really isn't space to add a bay for sata/nvme, thermal constraints prevent an i3/5/7 or ryzen. The AMD Ravenridge APUs are getting close to fitting in that category though. I have a 14? Which is ok for example.

    2. Re:What a great idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want to know what hell is like, run Windows 10 on a celeron N4xxx or N3xxx CPU. They do sell these, mostly HP 15-series laptops btw so I know firsthand. That's the chip of choice for almost all chromebooks then you add the pathetically underperforming 32GB flash storage device (SSD is far too generous of a title) and 4GB of RAM and it take about 4 minutes to fully load and open and render one page in any web browser.

      Pixelbook. If I were to get a Chromebook, that would be the one I'd get, because the specs are high enough to also run Linux or Windows.

    3. Re:What a great idea by Mal-2 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I was the original alpha tester for Windows 10 on Bay Trail Chromebooks, and the first implementation was absolutely hideous. Windows To Go technically worked then, but it took minutes of disk thrashing to do anything because Bay Trail has some serious design flaws that slow down both USB and SD transfers enormously (though for different reasons). Once it got to the point where it would run natively from the eMMC, things got quite a bit more usable, but while it is possible to get Windows 10 up and running on a 16 GB eMMC, there isn't enough space for maintenance of any sort. This meant moving things out to a flash drive and symlinking all over. I actually had it working for a few months that way, but then of course a major feature update broke it. 32 GB would actually be adequate for the OS, and everything else can go onto a flash drive without symlinking.

      Bay Trail (N28xx and N29xx Celerons) was shipped half-baked by Intel rather than miss deadlines. They couldn't get the SD card I/O to work reliably above 25 MB/s, so they just hacked it so it can't even try. Too many simultaneous calls to a USB drive can start blocking each other, dropping transfer speeds into the single digit kilobytes per second range. This wasn't particularly a Chromebook problem, it was all Bay Fail devices (except those that added chips to work around the problems).

      Ultimately I sold it, and bought a Haswell Chromebook instead.

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    4. Re:What a great idea by schweini · · Score: 1

      I don't agree - I installed Win10 LTSB using the instructions on reddit.com/r/chrultrabook on some chromebook with 16GB storage and 2GB(!) of RAM, and it's actually not too bad, for what it is. It runs basic browsing and Office 2013 just fine, as long as there's not too much going on at the same time. Still has the 8 hours battery life, too! And on a laptop that costs something like 150$. Really quite impressive.
      Sure, more RAM and more storage would make the whole thing way better, but it is quite usable as is - especially for the price.

      Bear in mind that this is probably only possible thanks to using the LTSB version of Windows 10.

    5. Re:What a great idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows LTSB even allows to remove the Metro applications?

      I think there would be another way. Use a minimal linux installation (on the embedded flash or a small SD card) or hypervisor and run Windows 7 32bit in a VM - give it the full 16GB drive and 1800+ MB RAM. Maybe there are way to remove stuff (custom iso, or just delete the wallpapers)
      Even if it's slow and the graphics are 2D, well the CPU is good enough, so it might keep up with keyboard strokes.

  20. Remember NetBooks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    When they first came out they came with Linux and they were an absolute revelation. Small fast and perfect for mobile computing for people who weren't tied down to the Windows ecosystem. Then Microsoft leveraged their ability to charge whatever they wanted for Windows licenses to "encourage" vendors to dump Linux and ship a handicapped version of Windows instead. Once that handicapped version of Windows became standard, Microsoft started dictating hardware specifications and as a result we were stuck with shitty atom processors, tiny amounts of ram, and tiny hard drives for many more years than necessary going with the pace of technology. NetBooks went from being a great mobile PC option into just a shitty small laptop that you bought for your kid to wreck.

    1. Re: Remember NetBooks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Netbooks still exist.
      Asus 12.6, 1.1-2.6ghz dual.cores, 4gb mem, 64gb Ss emc 11.6" 1366 res screen, usb 3, bt, wifi micro SD, etc.
      $200. Give or take $20 for discounts.

    2. Re:Remember NetBooks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some netbooks had Windows Starter, some had a normal version of Windows. They had 1GB RAM which was actually good in the day as PC with 256MB and 512MB were still around. The lone memory So-DIMM has to be replaced with a 2GB one.
      Where I mostly disagree with you is netbooks had 4GB and 8GB flash drives. This got replaced with 160GB hard drives. So the evil Microsoft made them drives 20x-40x bigger.

    3. Re:Remember NetBooks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Some netbooks had Windows Starter, some had a normal version of Windows.

      Unless you shipped the gimped version you were not authorized by Microsoft to get the less expensive license and your laptop was no longer considered a NetBook.

      > They had 1GB RAM which was actually good in the day as PC with 256MB and 512MB were still around. The lone memory So-DIMM has to be replaced with a 2GB one.

      1GB was the bare minimum for gimped Windows and again, shipping anything other than the minimum made you lose the right to ship that gimped Windows. Initial Linux versions shipped with less ram and worked great.

      > Where I mostly disagree with you is netbooks had 4GB and 8GB flash drives. This got replaced with 160GB hard drives. So the evil Microsoft made them drives 20x-40x bigger.

      Initially that was correct, the 160gb size was an "upgrade" but only because unlike with Linux, that was the smallest size even a gimped version of Windows could be shoehorned into. The problem is that YEARS later that standard never went up, so while other machines had 300gb, and then 500gb drives, NetBooks were still restricted to 160gb by agreement with Microsoft in order to ship that gimped Windows.

      So despite all your "disagreements" you failed to make your case. Microsoft used their dominance to purposefully hobble an entire category of machines in order to fuck over one area where others had a clear advantage. I have zero doubt that since Chromebooks are being pushed by the same vendors (Asus, Samsung, Acer, Dell, etc) who also rely on Windows for their primary PC products, this effort is going to result in the same bullshit.

  21. Re:Proving Windows is best by Tough+Love · · Score: 2

    I just use vmplayer.

    I parted ways with Vmware when KVM (and others) started to get really good. Now, I much prefer KVM. I mean, really strongly prefer. Vmware had its day in the sun.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  22. Re:Proving Windows is best by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

    How is that extinguish thing working out?

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  23. Re:Proving Windows is best by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    You do know VMPlayer is no longer free and is like $100. It and it's VMWare Workstation cousin is no longer being developed by Dell either. Sucks worse is VirtualBox is now owned by Oracle. Sigh

  24. Re:Proving Windows is best by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    Will KVM work with Intel CPUs that lack VT-d? I bought the 4770 instead of the 4790 because it was cheaper. I regret that choice as it doesn't support I/O pass thru. As a result I am limited to Windows 10/Hyper-V or Virtualbox unless I want to pluck $$$$ for VMWare workstation

  25. Re:Proving Windows is best by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 0

    But the elephant under the rug is, it's actually better to do it the other way: run Windows in a vm, that way you can keep your critical work and data entirely out of the hands of Microsoft. Microsoft knows this and now has a whole bunch of money invested in various efforts to forestall it. To be honest, it's hard to see that as a bad thing, it's the nearest thing to honest competition I have ever seen from that gang.

    And now Chromebook users can share in the Microsoft BOHICA update experience. Microsoft is drooling over the prospect os BSOD'ing a Chromebook.

    And I've booted Linux on Chromebooks just about since they came out.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  26. Re:MODERATION IS CENSORSHIP by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    This post will certainly be censored to -1 for telling the truth that moderation is a form of censorship. Moderation suppresses and reduces the visibility of speech, which means that, by definition, moderation is censorship. That truth is highly unpopular here, but it's necessary to speak truth to power. Posts that express unpopular views like supporting the United States, the Republican Party, Microsoft, or law enforcement are quickly censored to -1.

    The result is that Slashdot is now becoming an echo chamber and the real nerds are being driven away. That is why Slashdot comments are at their lowest rate in well over a decade and continue to decline. Moderation is a form of censorship, and it is killing Slashdot. If Slashdot is to survive, moderation must be abolished.

    Of course you are modded to -1. Your reply is off topic, and it is about as stupid as a reply can be, and it is simply 100 percent wrong. Here's the issue sparky. I was browsing at -1 because I was moderating earlier today.

    So I saw your pointless whiney wrong and stupid post. Here's the other thing Sparky. I am under no obligation to read your verbal vomit. You want to force me to? That isn't freedom of speech, its having to listen to a 3 year old screaming about being pissed off that he can't kiss his elbow.

    Now here's the yummy part. As soon as I finish this post. I'm pushing that little slider to obliterate your posts from my computer. So you can still post all the drivel you like, but your freedom of expression does not mean I'm forced to look kat it. Bye Bye, and if you post something worthwhile, it'll get modded up.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  27. Re:MODERATION IS CENSORSHIP by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    Here's a free clue - don't start a post with 'this post will certainly be censored'. It's just so weird and passive-aggressive, and makes any point you might have subsequently made seem a bit weak, or dodgy.

    But AC waasn't wrong. It got the downmodding it deserved.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  28. Re:MODERATION IS CENSORSHIP by Aighearach · · Score: 1

    They already have soylent news, how many sites do two dozen angry neckbeards need? Especially when #gamergate gave way to #metoo, I'd think they'd all want to huddle together somewhere, "they tuk er jerbs!"

  29. Re: Proving Windows is best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow! Windows. How 90s retro, grandpa! The rest of the world moved on to real operating system decades ago. But you just keep telling yourself that you're relevant...

  30. Re:Proving Windows is best by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    You do know VMPlayer is no longer free and is like $100.

    I didn't pay and I'm still using it. WP says it's still free to use player.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  31. I don’t get it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought just started it’s big push for Chromebooks hoping for same success with consumers as education. Now it works on a duel boot of Windows? Given the hardware most Chromebooks run, Windows 10 won’t run well on a lot of them. Not going to buy a pixel Chromebook to run Windows on it.

    1. Re:I don’t get it? by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

      Some of the more affordable Chromebooks run Windows quite well. I have an Acer C720 with a MrChromebox UEFI image, and the only thing that differs from a normal Windows ultrabook is the keyboard. Some key "chords" are required to compensate for keys not found on the Chromebook keyboard (Home, End, PgUp, PgDn, F11, F12, Insert, Delete, CapsLock, PrtSc, ScrollLock, Pause, "Windows key") but that is the only compromise required. If I had the touchscreen (C720P, and it can be added on after the fact, all C720 motherboards support it), that would work as well.

      Other Chromebooks that convert well include the Acer C740, Dell Chromebook 11, and even the rather crusty Acer C7 and C710 models, because they all feature expandable storage. Of course, they're only going to run as well as you would expect for hardware of their class and age, but the C740 could be equipped with a Core i3 5005U which is no slouch.

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    2. Re:I don’t get it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You chinkychina man? Why you writer like chinkychina man?

  32. Re:Proving Windows is best by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

    Will KVM work with Intel CPUs that lack VT-d?

    You are out there beyond my personal experience. My impression is that it wil but the performance hit is too much for high end gaming.

    I bought the 4770 instead of the 4790 because it was cheaper. I regret that choice as it doesn't support I/O pass thru. As a result I am limited to Windows 10/Hyper-V or Virtualbox unless I want to pluck $$$$ for VMWare workstation

    Sorry Intel screwed you. Instead of dropping bucks on VMWare, why not change out the 4770 for a Ryzen? A motherboard swap is kind of hard core the first time but its a great skill to learn, and alternatively any decent screwdriver shop can do it in minutes.

    Informative thread here.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  33. A day late, a dollar short. by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

    Chromebooks have been able to run Windows for a few years now, thanks to the chrultrabook crew. Google provided some assistance in the project, asking the developers to attend some of its internal conferences and lending them a Pixel 2 for a while (which turned out to have damaged audio hardware, making that a complete waste of time). Unfortunately, those same developers decided that newer Chromebooks are no longer worth supporting, due to undersized/underpowered non-replaceable components. (The good ones used to have M.2 slots. They don't anymore.) Thus, the project has pretty much closed shop.

    If someone else is going to take up the reins, that's great. The Libreboot people declined to take it over, so I'm glad someone is interested.

    --
    How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
  34. Dumpsterfire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would have been a more suitable name.

  35. "Apple Boot Camp-like..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most aren't aware, but Apple invented dual-booting, emulators and virtual machines. Apple released these features soon after Steve Jobs invented the computer mouse.

  36. Re:Proving Windows is best by laffer1 · · Score: 1

    I second this having upgraded from a i7 4770 to a Ryzen 7 1700. Virtualbox doesn't work well on them, but everything else I've tried has been great.

  37. Re:Proving Windows is best by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    My expensive 32 gigs of ram would have to be thrown out for DDR 4 in addition of a new motherboard. The IPC is about the same so there is no need to upgrade just for that.

    I will wait for another few years until things improve. Maybe Ryzen2 with DDR 5 before I bother with the expense

  38. Re:Proving Windows is best by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    I parted ways with Vmware when KVM (and others) started to get really good. Now, I much prefer KVM. I mean, really strongly prefer. Vmware had its day in the sun.

    It's been a couple of years, but last time I checked 3d performance and compatibility with vmplayer was vastly ahead of KVM. Since gaming is the only reason I run Windows, it's still relevant to me.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  39. Yes, qemu works. It predates VT-d. CPU overhead by raymorris · · Score: 1

    > Will KVM work with Intel CPUs that lack VT-d?

    "KVM" is often used to mean "qemu on top of KVM". Virt-manager actually calls qemu. Qemu internally uses KVM of it's available. Qemu runs fine without any CPU support for virtualization. I'd guesstimate maybe 10% slower than native if you use the right flags.

    KVM itself uses VT-d, but that's not a big deal for light usage

    There are a number of options you can use to optimize performance. For example, use -cpu host to set the right CPU type. If you don't, you could end up emulating a generic (old) x86, when you'd be a lot better off with -cpu core2duo or whatever is appropriate.

  40. Why not duel boot into Android? by Streetlight · · Score: 1

    It's been reported that Chromebooks should run Android apps, though I've seen reports suggesting not all Android Play Store apps run. As suggested above, they should run. To ensure they run, Chromebooks should be able to run current and future versions of Android OS. Would they duel boot or just have a second processor (a Snapdragon) just for Android?

    --
    In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell
  41. Re:Proving Windows is best by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

    My expensive 32 gigs of ram would have to be thrown out for DDR 4 in addition of a new motherboard.

    You could ebay it now while it's still worth something :) 32 GB of ddr4 can be had for $280 as of today. My crystal ball says there's a significant ddr4 price drop coming soon.

    I don't disagree, waiting is a good option. I am eyeing a 16 core Zen 2 Threadripper build with 64 GB, hopefully it can be done for around $2000 some time in 1H/2019. Hardly a budget box, but great value and easy to justify by faster builds. But what to do with 64 lanes of PCI? Let's see, GPU is just 8, I'm not going to do dual or triple. Four lanes per M.2, then I'm up to 12 or 16, now what? A shame to let it go to waste.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  42. Remember? by Waccoon · · Score: 1

    I loved the days when you didn't need special permission to run any OS you wanted.

  43. Re:MODERATION IS CENSORSHIP by Rainwulf · · Score: 1

    Moderation - in other words changing scores doesn't impact on your free speech.

    You have the freedom to say whatever you want, and you won't get arrested for it.

    However, that doesn't stop the community from looking at what you are saying and thinking "this guy is a tool" and hiding your speech. Deleting a shitty thing you type isn't censorship, it's just the world saying "you can say whatever you want, but we don't like it, so cya"

    Freedom of speech allows you to say anything you want, it doesn't mean it prevents people from saying "get the fuck out".. which by the way is ALSO freedom of speech.

  44. Re:Proving Windows is best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So I've checked and the i7 4770 supports Vt-d, the i7 4770K doesn't, the i7 4790K does. You were stuck on the older policy of not enabling this Xeon-like feature on overclockable processors.

    You can buy a Xeon E3-1230v3, E3-1231v3 or higher (check motherboard support page) and then the 4770K would be easy to resell because it's desirable and still current. (if never overclocked, mention it)

    I expect Ryzen 2 will use DDR4 (it's pretty much confirmed, it'll stay on AM4 socket)
    DDR4 should be cheap and fast then.
    I had a strategy of holding out on DDR2 till DDR4 all for naught because prices shot up considerably.
    Also, max DDR4 size might well double so Ryzen 2 would support 96GB and 128GB on four sticks up from the current 64GB max.

  45. Re:Proving Windows is best by Tough+Love · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's been a couple of years, but last time I checked 3d performance and compatibility with vmplayer was vastly ahead of KVM.

    A couple of years ago was exactly when GPU passthrough was under heavy development. Now there are multiple reports of success and I just don't see horror stories. I have no doubt that VMware player was way ahead at the time, I have tremendous respect for their ability to make stuff work, but they also like to wrap it in layers of cruft that you can't avoid. That's a turnoff for me, compared to KVM, which is accessible at every level, including the one I prefer which is simply the command line. I'm perfectly capable of setting up my own disk images, thanks. VMDK is completely irrelevant to me.

    Most folks use KVM via virt-manager or similar, I have no data on that. They seem happy, so I am happy for them. I'm happy for you too. :) The world is a better place with VMware in it. At the very least they keep the KVM devs on their toes.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  46. Re: Proving Windows is best by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

    Yeah Microsoft went bust because everyone's super cool like you.

  47. pfft. os x by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd prefer hackintoshing a chromebook vs windows bullshit.

  48. Re:Proving Windows is best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The words appear to be English. The sentences, on the other hand, are some dialect of gibberish.

  49. Re:MODERATION IS CENSORSHIP by mccalli · · Score: 1

    To be fair, Soylent News was from the dark days of beta. Had Slashdot continued going down that route, an alternative would have been necessary, and forking is simply what you do in open source-land if you don't like the direction of the main project. I'm registered there and to be honest the articles are very similar in tone to here. I've not posted, but I have the site on an RSS feed anyway.

    The one that really went to hell fast was the Reddit-alike Voat. Soylent News I read via RSS, but don't really feel the need for now Slashdot has got back on track.

  50. what's the fucking point of a chromebook then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what's the fucking point of a chromebook running windows? (we already have plenty of shitty hardware running that shitty software to choose from.) now if they made it easy to install a real linux without yelling at the user every boot to click that the system was insecure and needed to be factory reset to the original os; that would be a good thing :-)

  51. Nothing new here by wonkavader · · Score: 1

    You can install malware on just about anything.

  52. How do you get the windows install image/cd/dvd? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's the thing I can't figure out. Otherwise I'd do it.

  53. Re: Proving Windows is best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah Microsoft went bust because everyone's super cool like you.

    I have not used Microsoft Windows other than on a mini-form-factor PC which I use as an Internet terminal like I am doing now. Over 99% of the time I use my notebook computer running Xubuntu Linux LTS and have been using some flavour of GNU/Linux full-time since January 2000.

  54. The obvious question is "why". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they want Windows 10 to perform well, then they need to beef up the hardware, which means increasing costs until they match the Windows laptops. Why then should anyone run a Chromebook?

    For Chromebooks to be relevant, they need that price advantage. What this new development means to me is that Google doesn't think the OS can stand on its own and they need to make Windows an option to make a purchase appealing enough for the undecided. I don't know if that's the message they're trying to communicate, but it sure is the message they're sending.

  55. Fuck no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bought a Chromebook to ditch Winblows not dual boot it. If Google pushes this forward too far with Chromebooks, then I guess I'll pay more to switch to Apple to escape "Googlesoft" crap.

  56. Take it full circle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now Windows should have an installer for Mac OS/Chrome OS called FireBoot.

    Get it?
    BootCamp
    CampFire
    FireBoot

  57. Re: Proving Windows is best by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

    Hooray for you. Not seeing the rest of the world following your amazingly cool example though.

  58. Re: Proving Windows is best by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

    Never follow, Be a leader.