Slashdot Mirror


Amazon Is Ready To Take on Apple and Spotify in Streaming Music (bloomberg.com)

Amazon is turning up the volume in the music business. From a report: The world's largest online retailer will mount the first national TV campaign for its music-streaming service, featuring ads with songs from Ariana Grande, Kendrick Lamar and Queen. They're part of a larger effort that will extend to billboards, online video and radio, and to three countries -- the U.S., U.K. and Germany. Music has ascended the priority list at Amazon.com because of the popularity of the company's Echo speakers and the virtual assistant Alexa. Music is one of the most common requests of Alexa, and listening hours have doubled over the past year, the company said. "We're pouring fuel on the fire," Steve Boom, the head of Amazon Music said in an interview. "We have established ourselves as the leader in music services where voice is all you need to control it."

71 comments

  1. oh boy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    i cant wait to not subscribe to this
    and to have the neutered version i get free with prime removed to convince me

    1. Re:oh boy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't a new service, it has been available for a few years. This story is literally just that amazon is going to advertise the service...I'm really not sure why it is even here at all.

  2. Everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Amazon's announced goal is to be the single vendor of everything.

    Sorry if you don't like it, they're well on their way.

    1. Re:Everything by jellomizer · · Score: 0

      What is out there to stop them?

      The government will not put a stop to a Job Creator like Amazon. Because being a Job Creator is the only criteria.

      If Amazon were to explode today, it would be very bad for the world.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    2. Re: Everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? We survived without amazon before we can do it again. If amazon blew up today, it wouldn't have the slightest impact on most Americans.

    3. Re:Everything by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      What is out there to stop them?

      Unfortunately, every other vendor that wants to be single vendor of everything.

  3. nope by slashdice · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    if amazon music is anything like amazon, it will be full of fake chinese knockoffs, like Ramar Kendrick, Justin Timberake, and Birry Joer.

    --
    Copyright (c) 1990 - 2014 Dice. All rights reserved. Use of this comment is subject to certain Terms and Conditions.
    1. Re:nope by Serge_Tomiko · · Score: 1

      This is FAIRLY true. Amazon Video is OK, but there is no question the social aspect of Spotify will never work for Amazon. Their services are always bare bones.

      BUT THE COUNTERFEIT GOODS

      Fuck. I've gotten burned so many times. Every time I think they are getting better, nope. Ordered a $100 bottle of Chrome Azzaro. Looks like the real thing, smells like the real thing for 30 minutes. Then nothing.

      Fucking thieves.

    2. Re:nope by slashdice · · Score: 1

      Yep, I tell people that if it goes in your mouth or in your genitals, get it elsewhere.

      --
      Copyright (c) 1990 - 2014 Dice. All rights reserved. Use of this comment is subject to certain Terms and Conditions.
  4. Harbor for Rogue Sailors by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why bother streaming when it's available commercial-free in a harbor for rogue sailors?

    1. Re:Harbor for Rogue Sailors by froggyjojodaddy · · Score: 1

      I fully understand this is going against the mindset of a few but maybe it'll help explain why streaming services are so popular.

      I'm a bit older and grew up in the days of Newsgroups, Limewire etc. Pirating music was the norm and man, everyone was doing it. Fast forward a couple of years and while pirating music is still real easy, I'm a good paying job and don't mind paying for music. In the grand scheme of things, paying $15/month or whatever (Youtube Premium subscriber here) for me and my family seems like a fair trade. I get to download music (I know I don't own it), so do my kids and we can play it anytime want.

      The artists get paid (whatever percentage that might be) and I'm happy. I know the economics don't quite make sense. I could buy a whole bunch of albums for less than the $180/year I'm paying right now but the convenience is worth it for me. I don't have a favorite band or genre. I let Google Play Music suggest songs for me mostly and if I like it, I'll download for offline play.

      If my economic situation was different, I might feel different. But I'm doing OK and so I don't mind paying for convenience and letting the artists get a few dollars (cents?) along the way.

    2. Re:Harbor for Rogue Sailors by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      If you want to pay the artists, go to their concerts -- don't give most of the money to the middlemen and assorted pimps.

    3. Re:Harbor for Rogue Sailors by registrations_suck · · Score: 1

      I'm not going to pay $10/month for this, and $20/month for that, and $15/month for this other thing. Fuck that. My response to this trend has to just walk away from all of it.

      What I COULD be convinced to pay is, for example, $100 for "whatever" - where "whatever" includes music, movies, and whatever. So much the better if it includes movies in the movie theater, 3 packaged meals/week (think Blue Apron), etc. Could even make it different tiers:

      Music: $10
      Movies: $20
      3 meals/week: $50
      Cinema: $20
      TV: $10

      Mix and match, pick what you want - add it up, that's your bill, and you're dealing with ONE subscription provider. It's not really the prices I object to as the multi-provider, multi-account nickel and dime bullshit factor that just sends me in the other direction.

    4. Re:Harbor for Rogue Sailors by registrations_suck · · Score: 1

      If you want to pay the artists, but don't like the loud noise and crowd of a concert, send them a few bucks with ApplePayCash (:

    5. Re:Harbor for Rogue Sailors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bu your "dream" scenario could only happen in a world where all those things (and presumably more) are owned and controlled by a single corporation. Not saying Amazon isn't trying to move in that direction, but really if it were so, how long do you think your bill would stay the same in a no-competition marketplace?

    6. Re:Harbor for Rogue Sailors by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Why would there only be a single corporation that offered these bundles? Many corporations could and compete on selection and price. Only Amazon seems to have the vision to do that though. That is why they bought whole foods for example.

    7. Re:Harbor for Rogue Sailors by froggyjojodaddy · · Score: 1

      I subscribe to:

      Netflix
      Amazon Prime
      Youtube Premium (comes with Google Play Music Premium)
      and then on top of those, I have a Bell satellite subscription

      I don't find it un-manageable. They all serve very different purposes and each one of them is pretty great. Bell is great for watching movies and TV shows. Netflix is awesome for on-the-road or instant demand entertainment. I use Amazon Prime for orders and only really watch Top Gear on their streaming TV. Amazon music is terrible. And then Youtube Premium is pretty great too. I download a bunch of podcasts (startalk radio, Joe Rogan) and listen to them on the way home from work

      I live in a fairly rural area that doesn't have high speed internet so i download all my stuff to my device while at the gym but I don't feel like I'm actually missing out on too much either.

    8. Re:Harbor for Rogue Sailors by froggyjojodaddy · · Score: 1

      Whose got time to go to concerts? lol

      I'm not into music enough to want to endure a couple of hours journey to a stadium, pay inflated prices, and then have to suffer people around me screaming and shouting such that I can barely hear the band. None of that appeals to me.

      I have friends who LOVE going to concerts, especially 80's music but it's not my thing. Also, I don't want to sound mean-spirited, but when I say I want the artists to get paid, I don't mean I think they're under-paid and I need to give them more money on top of my subscription as some way of showing my appreciation. I feel like paying my monthly subscription is sufficient. Maybe they get $0.02 of my $15/month. Maybe they should get more. That's just not a battle I'm interested enough in to fight.

    9. Re:Harbor for Rogue Sailors by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2

      Stadium what? The best shows are at smaller venues like bars and community theaters.

    10. Re:Harbor for Rogue Sailors by Serge_Tomiko · · Score: 1

      You're poor. That sucks.

    11. Re:Harbor for Rogue Sailors by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Why bother streaming when it's available commercial-free in a harbor for rogue sailors?

      Why do we prosecute GPL violators so harshly? I mean, information wants to be free, right? And violating the GPL, or more correctly, ignoring the GPL is a copyright violation. The same thing that you do at the harbour for rogue sailors.

      Yes, the GPL is completely optional. If you don't agree to it, The license to use the software reverts to all rights reserved as covered by standard copyright law. That's why we call these licenses copyleft - without copyright, they're useless.

      Not much difference between downloading music, or movies (without permission) and releasing Linux without source.

    12. Re:Harbor for Rogue Sailors by damnitalready · · Score: 1

      How do you survive paying one company for your electric, one for your water, one for your mortgage, one for your home insurance, one for your auto? How do you get around paying for gas, auto insurance, buying oil from the local autozone, tires from the tire shop? There's a shit ton of things that most people get that aren't bundled into one single price, why would all those things be bundled?

    13. Re:Harbor for Rogue Sailors by damnitalready · · Score: 1

      100% with you... often left the computer connected overnight to draw down whatever I could from napster and got behind the argument of the time that I should be able to watch/listen on my terms when I buy media, therefore I won't buy until I can. Now we have damn near everything on almost any terms we want... on your phone, on your roku, on your desktop... download it to your tablet to take it on the road or stream it from the hotel. Movies, music, tv shows, whatever. $15/mo for that convenience is quite worth it, IMO.

    14. Re:Harbor for Rogue Sailors by registrations_suck · · Score: 1

      You know, you can buy Pepsi from a variety of places. You can also buy Coke from a variety if places. In some locations, you can buy BOTH of them. From the same provider!! Despite the massive competition between Coke and Pepsi.

      No reason why the same can't be true of other consumables, such as digital media. Disney, for example, could make its content available from the Amazon Supermarket, the Apple Supermarket and even the Disney Supermarket. Each of those Supermarkets could feature content from the Netflix Supermarket, as well as Bob's Porno Productions.

      As the consumer, I could choose to shop from any one of those Supermarkets, or none at all. Just like I do when buying Coke or Pepsi. I can base my decision on price, service and convenience available, not just the items for sale.

      Digitial media providers are going in the opposite direction. They want you to shop in ALL of the Supermarkets, if you want content from all of the vendors. I'm saying "fuck you" to that. If Disney wants to make its content ONLY available in its OWN Supermarket, then fuck Disney. I won't consume its content (legally). I don't care about Disney's content any more than it cares about my business.

      Honestly - the media companies are making it really easy for me. There is SO MUCH more to life than consuming packaged entertainment provided by others. By making it inconvenient for me to access that content, it's also making it really easy for me to make the decision to simply walk away from all of it and find other things to do....which, frankly, is just fine by me.

    15. Re:Harbor for Rogue Sailors by registrations_suck · · Score: 1

      How do you survive paying one company for your electric, one for your water, one for your mortgage, one for your home insurance, one for your auto?

      If I had the option of getting one bill for all of my household utilities, instead of separate bills for gas, electric, water, sewer, internet, and alarm service, I would gladly take that option, even if it meant an extra fee. One bill, one due date, one amount, one account, one login, one entity to deal with. Sign me the fuck up and take my money.

      But the difference between household utilities and entertainment services is that I need the household utilities, and I have to buy them on the terms that are offered (unless I want a visit from child services). Not so true for the entertainment services. I don't NEED to watch or listen to ANYTHING produced by a media company, let alone PAY for it.

  5. Welcome to future dystopia, Amazon users! by DogDude · · Score: 2

    So, does *nobody* really care that one giant MegaCorp is trying to own everything? Even a formerly anti-corporate message board is full of sycophants who can't get enough of Amazon. Me and my family are the only people that I know that don't give any money to Amazon. What happened to everybody else?

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
    1. Re:Welcome to future dystopia, Amazon users! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot has no standards. It's all about cheerleading here. That's why fucking one party with IP lawsuits brings out the pitchforks and torches and when it happens to another party it brings out cheers and shouts of joy. One political party can freely fuck over it's voter base without a mention but another one gets called to task over every undotted I.

      This place is a joke and it's sadly getting worse as less of it is about technology and more of it is about pulling one's pud to a new world version of two minute hate.

    2. Re:Welcome to future dystopia, Amazon users! by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 0

      Slashdot has been taken over by a bunch of prosperity-gospel preachin' Trumpatarians. If Bezos makes money, it must be his reward for being a good person. TESTIFY!

    3. Re:Welcome to future dystopia, Amazon users! by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      I think they care, but the problem is Amazon hasn't done anything that would really betray our trust in the company.
      There seems to be nothing stopping other companies from competing with them, except for the fact that Amazon is so big, that it is impossible to try to compete with them.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    4. Re:Welcome to future dystopia, Amazon users! by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2

      Betraying trust? How about...
      1. Pimping facial recognition systems to authoritarian governments and law enforcement.
      2. Echo "bugs" which made them always listen "by accident."
      3. Coming out with cloud cameras, and no doubt leveraging this to hoover up surveillance data for posterity. Once it's in the cloud, it's never really guaranteed to be deleted.

      That's just for a start...

    5. Re:Welcome to future dystopia, Amazon users! by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      Slashdot has been taken over by a bunch of prosperity-gospel preachin' Trumpatarians. If Bezos makes money, it must be his reward for being a good person. TESTIFY!

      Um ... Bezos is anti-Trump, and he is left wing in general.

      But don't let that get in the way of your TDS.

    6. Re:Welcome to future dystopia, Amazon users! by DogDude · · Score: 1

      I think they care, but the problem is Amazon hasn't done anything that would really betray our trust in the company.

      Interesting perspective. Amazon hasn't done anything to earn my trust.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    7. Re:Welcome to future dystopia, Amazon users! by 110010001000 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      As opposed to what? Giving your money to other music streaming mega-corporations like Spotify or Apple? Amazon has built the infrastructure to stream content. I would expect them to use it. Amazon music streaming is cheaper than the other monthly alternatives. Maybe this will force the others to lower their prices.

    8. Re:Welcome to future dystopia, Amazon users! by DogDude · · Score: 0

      Um, you don't understand this discussion.

      1. Your use of "TDS" or "Trump Derangement Syndrome" tells me that you're a real prick. Trump is an insane, stupid, mean, lying piece of shit human being. People who dislike him aren't "deranged". People who support him, however, might be.
      2. The parent post you ignorantly replied to was saying that Trumpafarians tend to worship money above all else, and since this is a discussion about Amazon, Trumpsters must love Jeff Bezos (and Amazon), because he's very rich. Hence, they spend money there and adore all things Amazon.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    9. Re:Welcome to future dystopia, Amazon users! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep justifying your monopoly mindset, capitalist asshole.

    10. Re:Welcome to future dystopia, Amazon users! by DogDude · · Score: 1

      Or just... don't stream music? We happily lived for decades without streaming music. You can still purchase and listen to your own music (I do).

      Or, stream your own music? There used to be lots of technologically-saavy on Slashdot who used to do this kind of stuff (I do).

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    11. Re:Welcome to future dystopia, Amazon users! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Got any actual complaints that aren't just names?

    12. Re: Welcome to future dystopia, Amazon users! by registrations_suck · · Score: 1

      You can buy a dictionary to do that from Amazon:

      https://www.amazon.com/Oxford-...

    13. Re:Welcome to future dystopia, Amazon users! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or better yet - people will decide for themselves how to listen, and we shouldn't throw down moral judgements with wrath on them when we don't agree.

      I realize this is completely against the grain of the modern internet rage culture which appears to espouse conformity and shames anyone who doesn't comply.

      It is oddly like the Scarlet Letter. Strange how that happened.

    14. Re:Welcome to future dystopia, Amazon users! by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Sure. But that is a different answer. You can also say "stop buying books" or "stop buying anything" because Amazon sells everything. My point is what is the difference if you were going to stream music (I dont), to pay Apple or Spotify? I would rather pay Amazon because they are cheaper.

    15. Re:Welcome to future dystopia, Amazon users! by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      I must have missed where Amazon is the only music streaming company on the planet. I would have thought $1 trillion Apple would be a music streamer. I guess not.

    16. Re: Welcome to future dystopia, Amazon users! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mad you got called out on your bullshit bro ?

    17. Re:Welcome to future dystopia, Amazon users! by DogDude · · Score: 1

      You don't care that Amazon owns everything? All you care about is what's "cheapest"? That was my point of this thread... I don't understand why nobody cares that Amazon is trying to own everything.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    18. Re:Welcome to future dystopia, Amazon users! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought your list would have led with "deleting George Orwell's book 1984 from devices for which it had been purchased"

      The fact that it did not does, I believe, illustrate the problem: people (collectively) have no memory. The echo issues never really got much attention -- less than the book incident -- and will likely fade from the collective memory even faster.

    19. Re:Welcome to future dystopia, Amazon users! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once it's in the cloud, it's really guaranteed never to be deleted.

      FTFY

    20. Re:Welcome to future dystopia, Amazon users! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I’ve spent thousands over my life on tapes, CDs and downloadable music. Spotify has a bigger, better organized collection that is more convenient to use. At 3x the current premium price I would consider it a bargain.

    21. Re:Welcome to future dystopia, Amazon users! by lgw · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So, does *nobody* really care that one giant MegaCorp is trying to own everything?

      What are they trying to "own"? In retail, they're the second largest player, with less than 10% market share. Definitely not the biggest in movie streaming. The only thing I can think of where they're the biggest player is "cloud", and better them than Microsoft!

      Me and my family are the only people that I know that don't give any money to Amazon. What happened to everybody else?

      We enjoy convenience and low prices more then pointless self-flagellation?

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    22. Re:Welcome to future dystopia, Amazon users! by asackett · · Score: 1

      I've often wondered that very thing. Way back when the One-Click patent was issued, slashdorks were enraged by it. Now... say something less than glowing about scAmazon or the Elongated Muskrat, and your /. karma takes a big hit.

      I've unwittingly given money to Bozo twice via eBay resellers. Otherwise, none.

      --

      Warning: This signature may offend some viewers.

    23. Re:Welcome to future dystopia, Amazon users! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Montgomery Ward owns everything, no one will ever beat them.....

      Sears owns everything, no one will ever beat them.....

      Kmart owns everything, no one will ever beat them.....

      Walmart owns everything, no one will ever beat them.....

      Amazon owns everything, no one will ever beat them.....

      See the pattern. Who cares, when someone better/cheaper comes along people will switch and Amazon won't have the power anymore. It's the cycle of life.

    24. Re:Welcome to future dystopia, Amazon users! by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      So, does *nobody* really care that one giant MegaCorp is trying to own everything?

      Actually, I do care. But to a large degree, it seems to me that the areas Amazon keeps trying to move into are already dominated by giant MegaCorps - almost all of the truly local retailers were already driven out of business before Amazon even existed.

      I still do shop a fair bit on Amazon. Also, I currently am a Prime subscriber (I wanted to dump it, but my wife objected - gonna keep bringing it up though). But I do look for alternatives more nowadays; I stopped all my "subscribe and save" subscriptions; and I have already decided I'm not going to support them in any additional ways - so I won't be buying prescriptions from them when they start doing that, for instance (our current pharmacy is actually locally owned), and I'm going to keep buying groceries from an actual grocery store (even though Winco is regional rather than local).

      Of course this decision has gotten easier since Amazon's service has started to suck over the past year or two.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    25. Re:Welcome to future dystopia, Amazon users! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, how about the fact that they started "Amazon Essentials" to make products that compete with small businesses whose products they were selling for quite some time, and for which they have TONS of sales data.

      How about the fact that they leveraged UPS/Fedex/USPS to make their business function, until they decided they were going to take over the shipping market by creating their own shipping company?

    26. Re:Welcome to future dystopia, Amazon users! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We enjoy convenience and low prices more then pointless self-flagellation?

      Speak for yourself, I enjoy convenience and low prices more, but I don't afterward engage in pointless self-flagellation.

    27. Re:Welcome to future dystopia, Amazon users! by lgw · · Score: 1

      Uh, how about the fact that they started "Amazon Essentials" to make products that compete with small businesses whose products they were selling for quite some time

      If they put Monster Cables out of business, it's a win for humanity.

      How about the fact that they leveraged UPS/Fedex/USPS to make their business function, until they decided they were going to take over the shipping market by creating their own shipping company?

      "Leveraged"? You mean "paid more than anyone else"? This is bad why again? Thus far they've shown no ambition for shipping beyond their own packages, AFAIK.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    28. Re:Welcome to future dystopia, Amazon users! by TheDarkener · · Score: 1

      Or, stream your own music? There used to be lots of technologically-saavy on Slashdot who used to do this kind of stuff (I do).

      Icecast works quite well for this.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
  6. Soulseek by future+assassin · · Score: 1

    play Original Nuttah by Shy FX...

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    1. Re:Soulseek by froggyjojodaddy · · Score: 1

      You mean Apache Indian featuring Shy Fx :)

    2. Re:Soulseek by future+assassin · · Score: 1

      UK Apache :P

      --
      by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    3. Re:Soulseek by froggyjojodaddy · · Score: 1

      Doh, you're right :)

  7. Harbor for Rogue Sailors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why bother streaming when it's available commercial-free in a harbor for rogue sailors?


     

  8. No thanks ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While my wife uses Amazon to order stuff, and I do get her to order stuff for me when it's cheaper, Amazon is a company I like to keep at a distance.

    Many of my browsers block all of Amazon's shit, because their ad system embeds in so many websites it isn't funny. Sorry, no, I'm not giving some affiliate page views from Amazon ... not my fucking problem.

    The problem with Amazon is they've become yet another large scale ad and analytics company .. and those I will ruthlessly block because I never consented to them tracking me.

    I wouldn't sign up for a streaming service from Amazon, or anybody else.

    I've got a huge music collection, I'll listen to it where, when, and how I want ... and I'm not going to pay data rates to do it, nor am I going to let some asshole track what I do.

    I'm afraid the entire internet is trying to move to a subscription model, and quite frankly, I don't think there's a single site I'd be willing to pay for.

    The internet used to be good, but companies like Amazon have turned it into a shit pile.

  9. If it is poor as the video service by kingbilly · · Score: 1

    I purchase things a few times per week on Amazon. I have the Prime card which is basically a perpetual 5% off discount forever. On the flip side, I walk to an actual mom and pop market in my town. Anyway, despite my interest in the online marketplace when it comes in handy, I don't care about this since I already have Spotify and I'm happy that Spotify does one thing and does that one thing very well. With the family plan it comes out to like $3.00 per month, to have synced playlists across all devices, with different devices set to automatically download for offline listening per-playlist (certain playlists are ready to go for a weekly car trip that includes a few dead zones, just add the songs to those playlists). But if Amazon video and the Kindle Stick are anything to go by, I don't think Spotify and Apple need to worry. The Amazon video applications on smart TV's, Roku, etc have the user interface elegance of a fisher-price edition of WebTV. They are frustrating to use. Not optimized to be efficient to navigate, and dog-slow. Speaking of dog-slow - the Kindle Stick. The point of my ramble is there are others like me who may use Amazon marketplace a lot, but they probably wouldn't leave Apple or Spotify because while Amazon does try to have their hand in everything, they clearly do not try to polish all those things. Amazon marketplace may be pretty decent (to each is own I suppose), but the Kindle Stick and Amazon Video are just 3rd world technologies with the Amazon brand slapped on top of it from an experience perspective.

  10. Fix Prime Video first by registrations_suck · · Score: 1

    I'd be happy if they could arrange things so that Prime Video would play without issues on my FUCKING GIGABIT CONNECTION, thank you very much.

    1. Re:Fix Prime Video first by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Oh, and here I thought you were going to comment on the fact that the majority of actual desirable content on Prime Video is not available to Prime subscribers unless they're willing to pay more money.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
  11. Fuck Amazon Music by gander666 · · Score: 1

    I am a subscriber to Amazon music. It was great, probably the best streaming performance with sketchy wifi/cell coverage when I compared to Google/Apple/Spotify (ironically: In my testing about 15 months ago, Google Play was hands down the worst streaming performance.) But the latest updates to the app seem to have this fucked up Alexa bullshit built in, and no apparent way to disable it. It takes my Lenovo t450 and pegs the fucking CPU's all the time as it waits for me to give it a voice command. Fuck that. Will not be renewing.

    srsly, the voice control bullshit is just that, bullshit

    --
    Suppose you were an idiot and suppose you were a member of Congress ... but I repeat myself. - Mark T
    1. Re:Fuck Amazon Music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have noticed no increase in cpu or power draw in the app.

      Settings. Then uncheck the hands free with Alexa box and she shouldn't wait around. I also only give it permission to storage, denied to phone, microphone and contacts.

  12. Amazon will go after every hot industry by tomatopaste · · Score: 1

    Amazon has gone after food, consumer products, logistics, Internet services, content production for media, and more. Their team is enormous and it is perfectly within the realm of Amazon to go after music. Have you ever seen their Amazon affiliation program? It's perhaps the best and simple program to use for people around the world. You've got millions of websites linking to Amazon for a commission. Their management is solid and their tech team is fierce. I strongly believe that Amazon will continue to be a powerhouse. It's time to invest into Amazon.

  13. Canadian Amazon user - content is horrible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bit the bullet and got amazon prime a few months back, part of the justification was to ditch the $10 a month Apple Music subscription (per device. was annoyed when a simultaneous connection from another device killed the primary - they want me to pay more to play from ANOTHER device? Fuck off - hey it all adds up)
    So got Amazon Music.
    Start searching for stuff.....classics, stuff I had discovered with Apple Music. NOTHING. NADA.
    Then you find stuff you like, some old stuff you enjoy. You stream it or download it locally... part of your playlist. GUESS WHAT MOTHERFUCKER, no longer part of amazon music. Taken out. Doesn't work anymore. WHAT - THE - FUCK. Why did it work 2 weeks ago?

    Same with Amazon Video... with the exception of one series I enjoy, the rest is junk compared to Netflix.

    People used to make fun of me when I would download and store music and use up precious storage... with storage being cheaper on phones, this doesn't look like such a bad idea.

  14. Maybe in the US by juancn · · Score: 1

    The world is a large place, navigating copyright laws is hard and Spotify and Apple have been doing it for a long time. They have barely expanded their prime video service abroad, so I'm not too worried. In most places Spotify is unbeatable and gaining speed.

  15. This is so sad... Alexa, play Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Music is one of the most common requests of Alexa, and listening hours have doubled over the past year, the company said.

    How much of that is due to the "this is so sad... alexa, play despacito" meme?

  16. Buh-bye Slashdot by DogDude · · Score: 1

    ... and Slashdot, as a community that used to care about corporate overreach, privacy, and personal freedom is dead.

    That's a fucking shame.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.