Slashdot Mirror
Firefox 62 Arrives With Variable Fonts, Automatic Dark Theme on macOS, and Better Scrolling on Android (venturebeat.com)
An anonymous reader writes: Mozilla today released Firefox 62 for Windows, Mac, Linux, and Android. The release builds on Firefox Quantum, which the company calls "by far the biggest update since Firefox 1.0 in 2004." Version 62 brings variable fonts, automatic dark theme on macOS, and better scrolling on Android. Firefox 62 for the desktop is available for download now on Firefox.com, and all existing users should be able to upgrade to it automatically. As always, the Android version is trickling out slowly on Google Play. The latest iOS version is available on Apple's App Store.
Or just bling and bullshit?
We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
I'm going to post a stupid question and then go read what it is, so here it goes:
Haven't browsers had variable fonts since the introduction of CSS?
#DeleteFacebook
It would have been nice if you had listed any of the various reasons. Is there something Chrome does better?
But... I still find myself opening Chrome pretty often for various reasons.
Yeah, me too, but all those reasons end in google.com, or they are the result of some noobs using it as an interface for something that shouldn't use it as an interface, like for programming drones or something.
"You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
Variable fonts is improved functionality. It's a Web Standard that Firefox now supports. You know, the whole point of web browser?
Mostly various websites. Particularly government websites (I use their websites constantly.) I really don't know why. For example, the city of Dallas Procurement website doesn't work at all in Firefox. Neither does the Texas Water Development Boards website. I have to use Chrome or IE.
Just noticed integrated tracking protection - kind of nice
some noobs using [the web] as an interface for something that shouldn't use it as an interface
What's better?
A. Using the web as an interface for something
B. Using a Windows 10 license in a virtual machine as an interface for something
C. Another binary portability mechanism that your reply explains
D. Not having access to something at all if your device happens to run GNU/Linux, FreeBSD, or macOS
Chrome has a more Metroid-morph-ball-looking logo.
#DeleteFacebook
What's better?
A cross-platform application. Use Tcl/Tk if you have to, or even python. That's cross-platform. But don't use a web browser to do a simple job. That's unnecessary bloat. Having to load Chrome on a netbook just to twiddle some settings on a drone is dumb.
"You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
I really want to like Firefox. I do. I use it as my primary browser right now.
But... I still find myself opening Chrome pretty often for various reasons.
I like to start my computer and go start the coffee, to come back to a system with all my pages reloaded.
Firefox (of the time) absolutely doesn't want to reload pages if it can help it. It would rather wait until the user clicks on a tab and then make them wait for the page load, and/or thinks that yesterday's cache of Slashdot, or the weather report, or Google news is what you really wanted.
This can be fixed, but only after a couple of hours of searching and trying out the various combinations of three obscure "about: config" parameters. (The param: browser.sessionstore.restore_on_demand should be set to... true or false?)
Firefox then started with the "Firefox wasn't shut down properly, would you like to restore your pages" thing every time I shut down my computer without closing Firefox first. (Why can't Firefox just ignore this? Why isn't there a checkbox "never ask again" on that page?)
So I made a script that triggers at system boot that automatically finds and presses that button after Firefox has loaded. This is not a trivial task, due to timing and lack of general transparency on X-windows systems, and has taken me tens of hours and much fiddling to get right. It involved various combinations of xtoolwait, wmctrl, and xdotool.
All well and good, until the last update...
And now Firefox starts at system boot, my program presses the "reload button", and... firefox starts and automatically "minimizes" to a tiny screen on the display. I have to manually grab the firefox window, move it, then click the "maximize" window to get a full screen again.
(And note "xdotool windowsize $WindowID 100% 100%" has no effect, and I don't know why because I've only spent about 1/2 an hour trying to figure it out the next problem. Probably a timing issue or something.)
At this point the cumulative aggravation of using Firefox is becoming too much to handle, I'd rather not have to spend three or four hours *every update* trying to figure out how to get it to do simple things, and I really *really* liked some of the previous add-ons.
Variable fonts is improved functionality. It's a Web Standard that Firefox now supports. You know, the whole point of web browser?
Now if they would just remove all the useless garbage that *IS NOT* the point of a web browser.
Fonts have ceased to be a bottle neck about a twenty years ago.
Mozilla needs more work on rendering performance. Rendering SVGs is slower than on Internet Explorer 11 in many cases, and in general about four times slower than on Chrome. In one extreme test case it is even about ten times slower than Chrome ( https://testdrive-archive.azur... ), but luckily that is not a typical example.
The problem with fixing this is that it is really hard work and this kind of work is not really valued. And that is where Open Source does not work too well. Why should people work their ass off if work is not really recognized? At Google engineers are at least paid well, so it's much easier to find people who are willing to do the hard work. Just look at the team size for Google's Slimming Paint project: https://www.chromium.org/blink...
Yeah, sorry, but variable fonts won't win you too many users I suspect.
Signature deleted by lameness filter.
I just tried your software for Linux, it does nothing that cannot be done with a few shell scripts. If you went through the trouble GUI make the most of the interface, provide documentation and make it intuitive. Perhaps the most common use case could be turned into a wizard and the documentation should be rewritten in clear non preachy-ranty prose.
It's like my add-ons just disappeared.
"The new phonebooks are here! The new phonebooks are here!"
Consistent new tab navigation behavior on the desktop, and the ability to override CSS / ignore tags without extensive addon configuration.
I know some of you numpties will criticize Mozilla no matter what they do, but you're just getting silly now. I just tested your claim, and in every case I still get a big green "Download Firefox" button, right there on the front page. You're either making this shit up, or you've fucked up your browser somehow, but there's nothing wrong with Mozilla's website.
Upgrade to Palemoon on your PC and to Brave on your Android devices.
If everyone here is so super smart and knows the one true way to do things, I wonder why there aren't many (any?) websites built that way.
Makes you think.
A cross-platform application. Use Tcl/Tk if you have to, or even python. That's cross-platform.
Which would require tech support to walk users through installing Tcl/Tk or Python with Tkinter. A developer can assume that one of the big four web browsers is already installed, unlike Tcl/Tk or Python with Tkinter. Nor would Apple's App Store Review Guidelines allow publishing a generic Tcl/Tk or Python with Tkinter interpreter for purposes other than learning to program. The developer would have to buy an iOS Developer Program subscription and an Xcode license separately and package the interpreter with the application.
Genuinely surprised it's not a rootkit
See subject: My program does it better or did DOS beat Windows OR did terminals beat out X-11/Wayland + GNome/KDE/xfce & a dozen other++ GUI desktop shells etc.? No!
* Character mode ALWAYS loses - it's NOT what most people want to use, period! What you tried is the equivalent of 12-15 *NIX terminal commands' functionality.
(History bears out the above for me)
Here's 30 reviews by registered /.ers on quality/efficacy of Win32/64 model (Linux one's faster too) https://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12478398&cid=57130680/ https://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12478398&cid=57137806/ https://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12478398&cid=57137868/ https://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12478398&cid=57137916/ https://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12478398&cid=57137944/
* Want more? Ask & "ye shall receive" (like 100,000++ users of my program WORLDWIDE...)
APK
P.S.=> It is FULLY documented in files it comes with AND in its README tab (w/ everything you need to know on hosts files + how the program operates)... apk
See subject & here's 30 reviews by registered /.ers on quality of Win32/64 model (Linux one's faster too) https://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12478398&cid=57130680/ https://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12478398&cid=57137806/ https://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12478398&cid=57137868/ https://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12478398&cid=57137916/ https://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12478398&cid=57137944/
* Want more? Ask & "ye shall receive" (like 100,000++ users of my program WORLDWIDE...)
APK
P.S.=> I'm NOT "genuinely surprised" a DO-NOTHING LOSER like YOU squawks by UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous worm though... apk
Just upgraded - now, new tabs focus in the URL bar. THANKS! I had been opening Chrome for just that reason--now I can use Firefox without annoyance.
But... I still find myself opening Chrome pretty often for various reasons.
Mostly various websites ... I really don't know why.
I don't know why, but your charming name Dallas May makes me cut you slack for such slack comments.
Does it still render a whole page before realizing I wanted it in a different font size, and then re-render from scratch? Is this how they define speed?
What the heck! We have an important update, we recommend you update as soon as possible. BAM! All extensions except two gone, it has some blueish theme and many things look ... strange. Screw you Mozilla.
Bullshit. I can get a download button while running firefox itself.
What kind of junk is this? Why not use Pi-Hole (you can run it without buying a Pi). DNS isn't "loaded w/ security bugs" and it's a hell of a lot more effective than a giant hosts file.
Firefox 52 has been EOLed now, anyone using XUL or Windows XP have to look elsewhere. It’s the end of an era, back in 2002 Mozilla released Firefox when it was Phoenix as a minimalist browser using XUL and therefore use nimble extentions. Now the XUL fox is dead and being devoured by basilisks under a pale moon.
dark theme indeed...
and they still cant use any engine but appls safari engine right?
Discordapp.com, a web-based text and voice chat platform, allows uploading server-specific emojis in Chrome. It used to allow uploading them in Firefox as well until the settings UI redesign in May 2017. Since then, clicking the "Upload Emoji" button has done nothing: no change in the window, no message in the developer console. When this bug was reported on Reddit, on Twitter, and on Discord's feedback forum. The official response out of Discordapp.com's developers for the past 16 months has been that if it works in Chrome, it works. (See this Tweet and this feedback reply.)
Open about:config in the Firefox location bar
Type browser.sessionstore.resume_from_crash in the filter box, or search for it manually iny
Double click
browser.sessionstore.resume_from_crash
It should change from
browser.sessionstore.resume_from_crash default boolean true
to
browser.sessionstore.resume_from_crash user_set boolean false
And this is another peeve I have about Firefox.
"resume_from_crash" set to TRUE means don't resume ask the user, while
"resume_from_crash" set to FALSE means resume from crash immediately.
It's like you have to leave your command of English at the door and just "do what the devs say to do".
(BTW: Thanks for the tip, I just changed it, and I'll see if it works. Would have saved me a zillion hours of work if I could have found it on the net at the time.)
Keep in mind that the built-in tracking protection uses Disconnect's filters. You can achieve the same thing via adding the Disconnect filters to uBlock Origin. The reason I'm mentioning this is because the Disconnect list breaks things like the Twitter embeds that some people like and there isn't an easy way to disable the filter for a single page, unlike with uBlock Origin. "Why did Twitter embeds break?" is actually an extremely common issue people end up having.
Regardless of how much I dislike Google and other big Internet corporations, and how much would I like to have better alternative to Chromium, I read a mailing list post by a guy I trust with software-related stuff - Theo de Raadt of OpenBSD fame - saying "Firefox is YEARS behind (Chromium), unless they change their strategy" in terms of security:
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-m...
I sincerely hope they will change the strategy. Until then it's Chromium for me.
Well Chrome has integrated support for Chromecast which is very nice. I don't even think there is an extension for Firefox that will do Chromecast.
Neither the Firefox developers nor Mozilla actually cares about security. I don't care about anything else at this point and neither should anyone else.
Retard Alexander Peter Kowalski, when are you going to stop posting fake support for yourself and then responding to it? It only makes you look even more retarded than your usual posts where you get stomped on. Just because you got stomped doesn't mean that you need to continue making yourself look as dumb as you are.
It's a Web Standard that Firefox now supports
Incorrect. Variable size OpenType isn't a standard at all. It's an extension to OpenType, which is a standard, that was developed by Apple, Microsoft, Adobe, and Google. Variable size OpenType allows a font file to give enough instructions on glyph construction, that the browsers can construct font sizes and styles that are not specified in the font file on the fly. Typically, when you specify a font size that isn't in your font cache, the web browser will use the largest font size and then scale upward to make do, fo rmissing styles, the browser just ignores it. This allows a web browser to take the instructions for how the font is built and build any size needed as opposed to scaling the fonts.
You can see this in action here. The CSS specifies an OpenType file and then goes on to specify styles and sizes that are not in the original file. Thus the browser dynamically builds the fonts according the specific instructions given on how to build those kinds of styles and sizes. Just as an example, you can see this line of code in the style attribute of one of the div tags.
style="font-variation-settings: 'size' 0, 'quad' 0, 'bevl' 0, 'oval' 0"
This allows those values "size", "quad", "bevl", and "oval" to be passed down to the font engine. Now those specific names "size"... are specific to how the font was created, the browser just takes those named values and passes it down to the font rendering engine. The font engine will know what to do with those named values because the font file specifies what those named values "do" to the font.
I believe that Firefox was sitting the fence on this technology since it has yet to become standard and Mozilla didn't want to encourage this style of "helping to make a standard". But yeah, pretty much the W3 has become more and more irrelevant for the web.
It's an extension to OpenType, which is a standard, that was developed by Apple, Microsoft, Adobe, and Google.
Just in case that wasn't clear. OpenType fonts are a standard file format. OpenType fonts are loosely based off Apple's TrueType font format. However, the variable size extension to OpenType is not a standard.
Yeah, but I heard that the Mozilla people hate oil cans.
What we want to hear is Mozilla to give more attention to bug fixing older releases that don't have all those unneeded features.
It's an extension to OpenType, which is a standard, that was developed by Apple, Microsoft, Adobe, and Google.
The "Google" bit is the important part. Chrome added support for this about a year ago, and following it's monkey see, monkey do policy of "innovation" for Chromefox, Mozilla has just finished copying them.
Firefox for Android crash accessing random sites, without obvious reasons.
From my original comment
Mozilla didn't want to encourage this style of "helping to make a standard". But yeah, pretty much the W3 has become more and more irrelevant for the web.
Now on to what you said...
Mozilla has just finished copying them
We're starting to get into the territory of the question that was asked way back in the 90s, "Who gets to make a standard on the web?" I don't think there's been any satisfactory answer to that question. Microsoft felt that the folks writing the web browsers back in the day were the ones who should have the most say in what "is" and what "isn't" a web standard. Mozilla, post Netscape, mostly wanted to stick strictly to W3 published standards. Google came aboard and pretty much was "Yeah! Open Standards!!". Fast forward to around 2016 and Google isn't so hip on waiting on W3 to standardize something. Firefox is starting to see the writing on the wall that standards don't mean much of anything, if no one is willing to follow them.
So that's where we are with Firefox. Mozilla is content to stick to W3 spec verbatim. Also smaller browser players see standards as good things. But of course, major players don't really want to have to wait on W3 to having meetings, have a vote, have a period for comment, etc just so that they can get their new shiny out the door.
So yeah, if Mozilla seemed a bit hesitant about implementation, it's because this isn't a standard and supporting it means supporting a non-standard web. I'm not sitting here trying to pass judgement, but it is for sure something to think about for a second. Do we want web browser makers to dictate the web standard or do we want a standards body to dictate it? There's not a right or wrong, it's just a different set of pros and cons. However, I feel that we're heading right back whence we came and we'll soon have sites that only work correctly because they use "Google HTML" and if you want a browser to actually work, you'll need one that is as close as possible to being compliant with "Google" spec. Much like how it once was with the "IE" web.
So yeah, what might have looked like a "let's copy Google" move, this was more in lines of Mozilla saying, "Hey Goolge! The W3 says nothing about this new type of fontworks you're doing! You are breaking the Internet with putting out non-standard HTML. *looks around industry* Oh I guess no one really cares. I guess we'll hold out. *waits a year, gets a few bugzilla reports demanding feature* Well I guess we'll have to cave on this one."
See subject (DNS security issue - BIG one) & I would on Pi but it had security issues (recently in dnsmasq) & it means non-native "Bolt-on-'MoAr'" ILLOGIC-LOGIC "your kind" stupidly uses that shows bugs inevitably due to overcomplexity of construction (dnsmasq bug IS an example thereof).
You also incur MORE OVERHEADS your way!
By comparison: Hosts doesn't need anything added to run as a NATIVE PART of the IP stack itself (no filter driver like firewalls need & in the case of Windows? Almost useless since it only does IP addresses - MOST THREATS use hostnames).
LASTLY I see you TRIED to "downmod hide" your FUCKUP last time I posted it (what a loser you are) https://news.slashdot.org/comm...
APK
P.S.=> Again: SEE SUBJECT: DNS doesn't have SECURITY ISSUES? LOL - WTF is KAMINSKY REDIRECT POISONING or DNSChangers (as only a COUPLE of known problems w/ DNS)... apk
Your software is just fine - well written, functional... I'm going to continue using the Host File Engine by mmell February 17, 2017
Your premise that hostfiles are a good way to deal with advertising and malvertising is quite valid - by JazzLad April 20, 2016
his hosts program is actually pretty good by xenotransplant August 10 2015
his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources by alexgieg September 25 2015
I like your host file system by Karmashock September 09 2015
that APK guy, I use his host file by rogoshen1 Tuesday March 03, 2015
I personally use a HOSTS file blocker produced from a genius called APK by 110010001000 October 27 2017
* Linux model = faster/more efficient...
APK
P.S.=> APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-1 32/64-bit for Windows https://www.google.comsearch?s...
Does it put back automatic text reflow on Android, so you don't have to scroll all over the place when you zoom?
"Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
Well said, my friend.
My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
What we want to hear is Mozilla to give more attention to bug fixing older releases that don't have all those unneeded features.
When they bugfix an older release, it becomes a newer release, at which point you, apparently, no longer want it because it's not the older release.
APK Hosts File Engine 2.0++ 64-bit for Linux/BSD h t t p : / / a p k . i t - m a t e . c o . u k / A P K H o s t s F i l e E n g i n e F o r L i n u x . z i p
Yields more security/speed/reliability/anonymity vs. any 1 solution (99% of threats use hostnames vs. IP address most firewalls use) more efficiently/FASTER + NATIVELY 4 less....
Vs. "Bolt on 'MoAr' illogic-logic" slowing you hosts speed u up 2 ways: Adblocks + Hardcode fav. sites u spend most time @ vs. competition loaded w/ security bugs (DNS/AntiVir) + overheads slowing u (messagepass 'souled-out' to advertisers easily detected & blocked addons + firewall filtering drivers) & their complexity leads to exploitation!
* ONLY 1 of its kind in GUI 4 Linux/BSD!
(Better vs. Windows model in speed/efficiency/merge)
APK
P.S.=> Protects vs. script trackers/ads/DNS request tracking + redirect poisoned or downed DNS/botnets/malware downloads/malcript/email malicious payloads... apk
Your software is just fine - well written, functional... I'm going to continue using the Host File Engine by mmell February 17, 2017
Your premise that hostfiles are a good way to deal with advertising and malvertising is quite valid - by JazzLad April 20, 2016
his hosts program is actually pretty good by xenotransplant August 10 2015
his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources by alexgieg September 25 2015
I like your host file system by Karmashock September 09 2015
that APK guy, I use his host file by rogoshen1 Tuesday March 03, 2015
I personally use a HOSTS file blocker produced from a genius called APK by 110010001000 October 27 2017
(Linux model = faster/more efficient)
APK
P.S.=> APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-1 32/64-bit for Windows https://www.google.comsearch?s...
See my subject: Says it ALL about you & "your kind" (low online losers who STALK me by UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous posts) that are DO-NOTHING "ne'er-do-well" zeros (like you, lol).
* Your JEALOUS is truly SHOWING, "Lil' Jowie" - lmao!
APK
P.S.=> ... & you KNOW it (now, everyone else does too) - it's NOT my fault you're an undereducated lazy loser, it's yours... apk
Good point. If enough people take up tracking protection, maybe given enough time, the whole mechanism of Twitter embeds will be given up upon. To me, this would be a good thing.
Alexander Peter Kowalski's posts make the internet more retarded.
Like how he claims the Chinese copied him but can't produce any evidence.
How about when he states that hosts does port filtering but again can't backup his statement which was shown to be false.
There is also his list of "experts" who support him but it turns out they don't say what he is claiming.
This also ignores his out of context quotes he uses to lie by omission.
The problem with APK is that his entire reputation is built upon the lie he told years ago that hosts is an effective security solution. It has been exposed numerous times as being a lie and when exposed APK fails to argue logically and instead will try to deflect criticism, change the subject, move the goal posts, return to a previously disproven statement, demand you prove you did better than his file concatenator, or just call people names. Expect that he will used these tactics to try to deflect from these criticisms. He will continue to lie by stating that he won or "dusted" you while failing to refute anything you said, will never provide real evidence, and generally try to dodge the issue.
Face it APK is one of the most detested individuals here for good reason. When ever his poor behavior, awful logic, over statements, and horrendous writing are called out he has a fit and has done so for years across the internet. He is a spammer, and is an abusive insecure little man who is washed up and never amounted to anything. Until he produces actual verifiable facts supporting his case nothing he says should be taken seriously.
See subject & 2 questions you won't answer: 1.) Do hosts stop threats served by hostname (the way threats are done most) by blocking them? Yes. 2.) Do hosts speed you up 2 ways in adblocking (preventing more infection/tracking/slowdown) & via hardcoded favorite sites resolving faster + protecting vs. dns down or redirect poisoned? Yes.
My hosts program's the only 1 that does the latter @ TOP of hosts cached in RAM (for best performance) & only 1 of its kind on Linux/BSD in easy to use flexible configuration GUI form.
(I also did that latter part LONG before the Chinese & 1st http://theregister.co.uk/2017/... )
APK
P.S.-> You did work that's that effective doing more for less faster in kernelmode speed (cpu priority) w/ less complexity for exploit + excess overheads vs. solutions KNOWN to be security-issue riddled (like addons (souled-out to NOT work by default OR easily detected & blocked that are BYPASSABLE & EXPLOITABLE), DNS & Antivirus)? NO... apk
"classic Windows hosts trick to block the Coinhive or Crypto-Loot domains" - https://www.bleepingcomputer.comnews/security/a-new-player-joins-coinhive-on-the-browser-cryptojacking-scene/ - BLEEPING COMPUTER
SANS ("A related approach to the DNS issue is to create a hosts file on each system that sends requests for spyware to some place else. Both Ramu and an anonymous reader have suggested this" hosts by myself & RAMU right @ START of "malware explosion" mid 2005 on) https://isc.sans.edu/forums/di...
Aryeh Goretsky/ESET/NOD32: hosts = good security http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=7442373&cid=49747129/
ZD NET http://www.zdnet.comarticle/how-to-use-a-hosts-file-to-improve-your-internet-experience/ "Hosts files really shine by letting you block ads, spyware sites, malware sites, & tracking sites"
Steve Gibson on hosts https://www.grc.comsn/sn-045.htm/
Oliver Day (SYMANTEC/SECURITYFOCUS) http://www.securityfocus.comcolumnists/491/
APK
"It's working: Neville... it's working!" See subject & results from THIS month alone https://it.slashdot.org/commen... & https://it.slashdot.org/commen... + https://it.slashdot.org/commen... + https://it.slashdot.org/commen... that's only recently while I've been on Linux (few months now only) & 100's of times vs. MANY other botnets/malwares etc. in the past circa 2006-early 2018 while I was on Windows: There's BULLSHIT & doing nothing pessimsm & then? There's CONCRETE VISIBLE UNDENIABLE REALITY (see those links as proof).
P.S.=> 3 things show I do it right:
1st = User praise my hosts engine https://tech.slashdot.org/comm...
2nd "ATTACKS" I GET (from UNIDENTIFIABLE ac as Elon Musk got https://tech.slashdot.org/stor... )
3rd BEING IMITATED = "Imitation = sincerest form of flattery" https://linux.slashdot.org/com... JUST LIKE CHINA DID ME TOO... apk
Arstechnica = losers who stalked me (as you do now anonymously unidentifiably) to NTCompatible.com & Windows IT Pro magazine forums to their public dismay in Jeremy Reimer & Jay Little + Jarrett DeAngelis (who posts here on /. until I drove his ass off too) when their websites were REMOVED by their hosting providers in Shaw Canada & CrystalTech (for both email harassing me caught on a tracking ticket + stalking me & posting lies about me on them AFTER I destroyed them both PUBLICLY @ Windows IT Pro on Exchange Servers memory being freed UNHALTING them (which tells you Exchange is HEAVILY POINTER ORIENTED linked list driven, which leads to memory fragmentation that CAN halt a serverware)).
Jay Little the "self-proclaimed 'EXCHANGE EXPERT'" HAD TO CONCEDE IT from MICROSOFT'S OWN DOCUMENTATION proving it FOR me there (where they as usual stalked me AS YOU ARE NOW)
Thor SCHMUCK?
Ask him WHY his false accusation of an old ware of mine was 1st taken down to NO threat & CA sold off the SHITTY antivir he sold (as a paid pawn of theirs) & they are GONE, done. dead... lol!
Lookup "CA Accounting Scandal" on Google - scumbags & THEIR BIRDS OF A FEATHER just go down vs. me everytime!
APK
P.S.=> TONS of Security experts KNOW blacklists work (no questions asked) & 3 things show I do it right:
1st = User praise my hosts engine https://tech.slashdot.org/comm... (so much for ME being "detested" but I'm not here to win a popularity contest - just here to WIN so everyone does).
2nd "ATTACKS" I GET (from UNIDENTIFIABLE ac as Elon Musk got https://tech.slashdot.org/stor... )
3rd BEING IMITATED = "Imitation = sincerest form of flattery" https://linux.slashdot.org/com... JUST LIKE CHINA DID ME TOO... apk