Slashdot Mirror


Google Suppresses Memo Revealing Plans To Closely Track Search Users in China: The Intercept (theintercept.com)

Google bosses have forced employees to delete a confidential memo circulating inside the company that revealed explosive details about a plan to launch a censored search engine in China, The Intercept has learned. From the report: The memo, authored by a Google engineer who was asked to work on the project, disclosed that the search system, code-named Dragonfly, would require users to log in to perform searches, track their location -- and share the resulting history with a Chinese partner who would have "unilateral access" to the data.

The memo was shared earlier this month among a group of Google employees who have been organizing internal protests over the censored search system, which has been designed to remove content that China's authoritarian Communist Party regime views as sensitive, such as information about democracy, human rights and peaceful protest.

According to three sources familiar with the incident, Google leadership discovered the memo and were furious that secret details about the China censorship were being passed between employees who were not supposed to have any knowledge about it. Subsequently, Google human resources personnel emailed employees who were believed to have accessed or saved copies of the memo and ordered them to immediately delete it from their computers. Emails demanding deletion of the memo contained âoepixel trackersâ that notified human resource managers when their messages had been read, recipients determined.

35 of 132 comments (clear)

  1. Come On Google by zippo01 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Man, google is really stepping in it hard as of late. http://www.foxnews.com/tech/20... They are turning into a company, that is easy to hate. They are becoming a close minded and censorship happy group, who think they know best, trying to shape the would. This will backfire and fail, if not from government regulation then by people. This also applies to You tube. The more you tighten your grip the more star systems will slip through your fingers.

    1. Re:Come On Google by Mashiki · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well when "do no evil" becomes "for the greater good" or whatever it is now, it shouldn't be a surprise.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    2. Re:Come On Google by mlw4428 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why is it Trump supports bitch about censorship? It's a private company. You don't have to use Google. Not a single thing they do are you required to use. What you're really mad at is that popular websites do not share your views and you cannot get enough fellow people, who share your views, to actually invest/use/popularize a community of your own...at least not without a lot of Russian bots to help fake traffic. The world doesn't share your views and you can at least acknowledge this by not using a word generally reserved for use when a government is actually doing the censorship or at least qualify that it is private, corporate censorship within its own properties not paid for by taxpayer dollars. But then again, maybe that plays too much against the victimhood ideology that Trump supporters seem to thrive on having.

    3. Re:Come On Google by blahplusplus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Man, google is really stepping in it hard as of late

      That's because you are all unaware all states are at war with their respective publics because they fear the internets potential to politically awaken the publics of the globe. See here by former national security advisor, this is just rich capitalist oligarchs and powers that be doing everything they can to maintain control over the public minds of the planet.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    4. Re:Come On Google by zippo01 · · Score: 3

      You make a lot of incorrect assumptions.

    5. Re: Come On Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You're just upset because the victimhood card used to be used exclusively by "progressives" and now right wingers have adopted their (admittedly effective) tactics.

    6. Re:Come On Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's funny that that people in tech (and by extension largely on the left, politically) vehemently defend censorship by private corporations. This would not have even been a thing just three years ago. Now the shoe in on the other foot and they're great defenders of corporate rights.

    7. Re:Come On Google by nitehawk214 · · Score: 2
      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    8. Re:Come On Google by TheCastro1689 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why would anyone be ok with censorship of any kind? Isn't the freedom of information important for everyone?

    9. Re:Come On Google by lgw · · Score: 5, Funny

      The motto wasn't "do no evil", it was "don't, be evil". The comma was sometimes overlooked - typical small print from an advertising company.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    10. Re:Come On Google by El+Cubano · · Score: 3, Funny

      Why would anyone be ok with censorship of any kind? Isn't the freedom of information important for everyone?

      You have this all wrong. This is not censorship. In fact, Google is being a role model for how to make information as free as it can possibly be. Through this partner arrangement, they are making all of the information about every search and every user accessing the tool in question fully, completely, and totally freely available to the Chinese government. The information does not get much freer than that.

      The folks at the NSA are jealous that they cannot have the same thing.

      In case anybody reading this is sarcasm impaired, this was meant to be sarcastic. Except for the part about the NSA being jealous; that is sadly true.

    11. Re:Come On Google by blahplusplus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      " vehemently defend censorship by private corporations. " - I thought you liked the free market? No? Conservatives change your tiny minds every 4 years anyway, now you're on the Trump wagon, next year it's back to deficit spending...

      If you weren't such unabridged liars the waking world might take you seriously instead of roasting marshmallows over the fire of your corpse, as we collectively do.

      You haven't made any sense, what is it that you believe? The reality is the oligarchs and the rich are at war with regular people, and if you don't understand that you don't understand politics at all.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    12. Re:Come On Google by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

      Well when "do no evil" becomes "for the greater good"

      They're google not the Sandford Neighbourhod Watch Alliance.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    13. Re:Come On Google by Mashiki · · Score: 4, Informative

      They're google not the Sandford Neighbourhod Watch Alliance.

      That's funny, the company I work for has it's own code of ethics. One of the key points is they will not work with, develop, or provide services or technology to governments that repress their own citizens by use of the state(i.e. police, courts, law) or will use technologies developed to repress people. It's not a surprise either, since nearly all the board members are from former communist countries. That code of ethics is a good example of being a "good corporate citizen" vs the current state of google where ethics can be put on hold as long as it's for something that can be justified, even if it's wrong.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    14. Re: Come On Google by Mashiki · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because private property is private. Applying your dumbass theory I could show up to your house and tell your children about how their mom bleaches her asshole in great detail.

      A company may be private, but private property doesn't translate into that if said company actively promotes it as a public square. Plenty of case law on that in Canada and US for example where the courts have ruled that protections of speech must be extended to private property if it's used for such or promoted as such.

      Is that house promoted as a public square? Nope. Is twitter, facebook, and google promoting their social media services as the public square? Yep. That's the difference.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
  2. Incorrect Title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The correct title should be; Google's Attempt to suppress memo fails with massive Streisand effect.

  3. Taste of their own medicine by Dunkirk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    > Emails demanding deletion of the memo contained "pixel trackers" that notified human resource managers when their messages had been read, recipients determined.

    How's it feel to have the shoe on the other foot?

    --
    Acts 17:28, "For in Him we live, and move, and have our being."
    1. Re:Taste of their own medicine by Luckyo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That was my reaction too. They're on record tracking everything and anything they can get their hands on, regardless of user concent through their analytics platforms and such.

      "Rules for thee but not for me" is a standard litmus test of a tyrant.

    2. Re:Taste of their own medicine by larryjoe · · Score: 2

      > Emails demanding deletion of the memo contained "pixel trackers" that notified human resource managers when their messages had been read, recipients determined.

      How's it feel to have the shoe on the other foot?

      So, the Google employees that disabled auto loading/rendering of inline pictures should have plausible deniability in saying that they never read the HR message.

      Surreptitiously monitoring employees is creepy.
      Intentionally censoring searches is contemptible.
      Ratting out users is collaboration.

  4. These days, Google is evil, plain and simple by gweihir · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There really is nothing more to add.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    1. Re:These days, Google is evil, plain and simple by commodore64_love · · Score: 3

      It truly is sad when I trust Microsoft Outlook.com with my emails more than I do Gmail.com. (It used to be opposite.) "Do no evil" is now "For the greater good."

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    2. Re: These days, Google is evil, plain and simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For the greater greed

  5. Google has jumped the shark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Google Closely Tracks Employees Reading Memo Which Demands Deletion of Memo Revealing Plans To Closely Track Search Users in China

    Do no evil. Those days are behind us, captain.

  6. And Google wonders why it's got problems by MikeRT · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Too pure to help shape the DoD drone program so that AI might have "don't be evil" coded into its framework, but not too pure to help the PRC identify, track and persecute people out of favor with the regime.

    This isn't hypocrisy on the level of "pastor caught in bed with the church secretary one time." This is hypocrisy along the lines of "pastor caught running a child sex trafficking network."

    1. Re:And Google wonders why it's got problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      Google never had any "don't be evil" coded into anything, ever.

      They are just another corporation looking to make a profit any way it can. They'd harvest their employees organs if they could (and they probably do in China).

      They will happily help China run their internment camps for Muslims, the same way IBM happily helped Hitler organize the Holocaust.

      And nothing google does will ever prevent them from contributing to the Linux Kernel, because the CoC doesn't apply to corporations.

  7. Two internets - better get in now by magarity · · Score: 4, Funny

    Does anyone remember the story earlier this morning: Schmidt predicting a second internet run by China. Obviously the time to get in on the action is now, and now is a bit too late. Google is just playing catch-up.

    1. Re:Two internets - better get in now by OYAHHH · · Score: 2

      A second Internet run by China? Hahahahaha. Not laughing at you magarity but rather the stupidity of the concept of China running an Internet.

      I think I would be fairly safe saying that anything run by the Chinese that connects computers together will be in name only an "Internet."

      China just wants a socialist run version of AOL. And if you think AOL stunk just wait until Chinese bureaucrats put their loving touch on the system.

      What a joke....

      --
      Caution: Contents under pressure
  8. Pixel trackers by MobyDisk · · Score: 2

    Emails demanding deletion of the memo contained pixel trackers that notified human resource managers when their messages had been read, recipients determined.

    I thought most mail applications blocked pixel trackers. And Gmail tends to download images from emails and re-host them, which makes pixel trackers useless. Or maybe Google disables the feature for their own trackers? What email program do Google employees use?

    (P.S. to Slashdot editors - the summary has unicode quotation marks that don't work in Slashdot.)

  9. I'm Certain You Have It Wrong by tungstencoil · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm certain that you have it wrong.

    You see, if Google doesn't do this, someone will. So you have it wrong.

    You see, if Google does this, then Google can help shape future open communication and equality. So you have it wrong.

    You see, then Google gets to decide bits and pieces to influence. Google only has The Good in mind. So you have it wrong.

    You see, Google is good. They understand this, and that they - and only they - are responsible for ensuring freedom for the Chinese. If they fail, all will be lost. So you have it wrong.

    You see, Google cares. You must understand this about them, and that they are in the unique position to help. Only by censoring data access, censoring freedom, and reporting user actions, can they enforce freedom.

    So you have it wrong.

    1. Re:I'm Certain You Have It Wrong by Mr307 · · Score: 2

      Obligatory CS Lewis quote:

      "Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience. They may be more likely to go to Heaven yet at the same time likelier to make a Hell of earth. This very kindness stings with intolerable insult. To be "cured" against one's will and cured of states which we may not regard as disease is to be put on a level of those who have not yet reached the age of reason or those who never will; to be classed with infants, imbeciles, and domestic animals."

  10. Google's new motto: by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 3, Funny

    Don't be evil, be SUPER EVIL

  11. Pichai needs to go by WindBourne · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The company has gone from do no evil, to join the evil.
    If they continue down this path, they will become worthless.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  12. Rapidly increasing toxicity of Google's brand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Attempted suppression is evidence Google knows full well what it's doing is wrong and yet they persist because they are scum.

  13. Eurasia has always been at war with... by Grog6 · · Score: 2

    We are now living 1984; thanks to all the elitist assholes at IEEE I told about this two decades ago.

    They sold us for pocket change; Facebook is only the public face of it.

    When Trump declares martial law, you'll know why they sold all that ammo during Obama's term.

    "He's gonna take our Guns!!" No, Putins going to get you to fight his war.

    No Russian troops need to be involved; it's not like Trump's minions are going to be discerning on who they shoot; every kill is an American, just like the civil war; Russia wins whoever loses.

    We're so fucked.

    --
    Truth isn't Truth - Guliani
  14. Re:I don't care ... by BlueStrat · · Score: 2

    That sovereign country can make all the rules it wants.

    Google is in the business of make money.

    Then Google can move to China and become a proper Chinese-owned & -based company.

    Google should be blacklisted from any US government contracts because they are a national security risk, as they are open to blackmail over their Chinese market access by the Chinese government. Many individuals and businesses have lost the privilege of bidding on US government contracts for far, far less.

    Tell your congresscritters to ban Google from government contracts if it works with oppressive regimes like China if they want your votes for the midterms.

    Strat

    --
    Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.