Slashdot Mirror


Huge Trove of Employee Records Discovered At Abandoned Toys 'R' Us (hackaday.com)

An anonymous reader writes: Hackaday recently engaged in a bit of urban exploration, taking a look inside of a recently purchased Toys "R" Us location that has been boarded up since the once giant toy store chain folded in June. Inside they found plenty of hardware left behind, from point-of-sale systems to the Cisco networking gear in the server room. But the most interesting find was on paper.

In a back office, they found "several boxes" of personal information about the store's employees, from their medical records to photocopies of their driver's licenses and Social Security cards [and also tax forms]. A video included with the article gives the viewer an impression of just how large a collection of files were left behind.

The author wonders if the situation in this particular store was a fluke, or if the other [800] Toys "R" Us locations were left in a similar state.

The article calls it "a very surprising look at what get's left behind when the money runs out and the employees simply give up...."

"We saw the great lengths the company went to protect customer information, so to see how little regard they had for their own people was honestly infuriating."

112 comments

  1. The old fashioned way by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    Paper hacking

    1. Re:The old fashioned way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have seen videos on YouTube of people with video cameras "exploring" abandoned properties including businesses. In some, power was still on and computers left running! I almost all of the abandoned businesses, merchandise and equipment was just left behind.

  2. Trespass. Breaking and Entering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So they call it 'urban exploring'?

    1. Re:Trespass. Breaking and Entering by ArylAkamov · · Score: 1

      Yep. It's a lot of fun exploring abandoned buildings.
      Assuming it's actually abandoned and in disrepair and there was no actual forced entry. Exploring abandoned factories and shit is a lot of fun.

    2. Re: Trespass. Breaking and Entering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where I work, petty criminals couldn't get a hold of that information without bolt cutters and torches.

      Our shit Dell locked down computers? Have at them, but customer data - good luck with that.

    3. Re:Trespass. Breaking and Entering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a thing. Urbex. People explore abandoned places and make/post videos or pictures of the process. An interesting one was one of the falling apart Dixie Square Mall in Harvey IL before it was finally torn down a few years ago (it was closed in 1978). There's also many pictures and videos of old factories, Soviet-era buildings, etc.

      Many speak of a code of ethics where nothing is to be disturbed or taken from these places.

    4. Re: Trespass. Breaking and Entering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I feel like kicking the shit out of some pathetic nerd. You will do.

    5. Re:Trespass. Breaking and Entering by sjames · · Score: 1

      Given that the only legal fiction that would have any reason to care is currently pining for the fjords, no harm, no foul.

    6. Re:Trespass. Breaking and Entering by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      So they call it 'urban exploring'?

      Depends. Trespass requires an actual barrier that prevents entry, and breaking and entering require same.

      More often than not, some door or gate is left unlocked or other point of entry, at which point the urban explorer will generally exploit.

      There are a few on YouTube, and they often document places that are closed down. Depending on your point of view, they can either be a nuisance by being where they shouldn't be (proper urban exploration means touching and taking nothing other than photos and video), or a useful pastime by letting people see what's happened and satisfying their curiosity (often to the point where they won't bother doing it themselves, so one person may deter dozens of others from actually doing it).

      It can be interesting to see some decades old stuff that was forgotten about still pristine out there, or other times being used to document the downfall of something. Like a mall - they catch it in its heyday, then periodiocally re-document it until the point where it's being torn down.

      Some good ones to watch on YouTube include "This is Dan Bell" (especially the Dead Mall series), and "Retail Archeology".

    7. Re: Trespass. Breaking and Entering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just kick? Twist his arms so hard he won't be able to jerk off for a moment, then push his face into a pile of feces. That's the way to do it.

    8. Re:Trespass. Breaking and Entering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Depends. Trespass requires an actual barrier that prevents entry, and breaking and entering require same.

      Um, no. Trespass just means trespassing on someone's land without permission - that doesn't require any barrier, it simply means that you cross land you do not own and have no permission to access.

      Breaking and entering does require a barrier, if the laws were identical you wouldn't need separate laws. You have separate laws precisely because one is simply about going where you don't have permission to go, and the other is about breaking something to go where you don't have permission to go, hence the "breaking". You could probably more accurately rename these laws to "trespass" and "breaking and trespass".

    9. Re:Trespass. Breaking and Entering by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      Yep. It's a lot of fun exploring abandoned buildings.
      Assuming it's actually abandoned and in disrepair and there was no actual forced entry. Exploring abandoned factories and shit is a lot of fun.

      Sfill illegal as hell, but hey, it's a lot of fun. Hint: Forced entry is not required to be guilty of trespassing. It can be an additional charge on top of trespassing if it occurred, but trespassing is a prosecutable offense without it. If it's private property that's not yours and you have any reason to believe that the owner doesn't want you there--it's trespassing.

    10. Re:Trespass. Breaking and Entering by msauve · · Score: 1

      I don't think "forced entry" means what you think it means. ANY amount of force can constitute breaking and entering - push a partly open door so you can get through? That's forced entry. But, even walking through a wide open door can still be illegal trespass.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    11. Re:Trespass. Breaking and Entering by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      This would seem like a perfect time to say "So sue me!". "Urban exploration" differs from breaking and entering in that absolutely no one gives a shit.

    12. Re: Trespass. Breaking and Entering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trespassing usually has a notification element to it, be it a sign or owner telling you to leave.

      https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/criminal-trespassing-law.html

    13. Re:Trespass. Breaking and Entering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Urban exploration" differs from breaking and entering in that absolutely no one gives a shit. Except these idiots caught up in a high of righteous fury. Who are desperate to inform others that they are above them in any way that they can.

      FTFY.

  3. Reading, reading, and more reading. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    From the article you didn't read.

    But much to my surprise, a friend of mine recently invited me to join him on a trip to the now defunct toy store. His wife’s company purchased one of the buildings for its ideal location near a main highway, and before the scrappers came through to clean everything out, he thought I might like a chance to see what was left.

    1. Re: Reading, reading, and more reading. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So apparently they call it urban exploration instead of trespassing since not everyone there was authorized to be there. According to the article I read.

    2. Re: Reading, reading, and more reading. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends upon the interpretation of "wife's company". If the wife owns the company that bought the building, then that means the husband gave the author permission to be there.

    3. Re: Reading, reading, and more reading. by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      eh, husband and wife own things jointly in these United States. Husband can invite friends into his property.

    4. Re:Reading, reading, and more reading. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "His wife's company"

      Did his friend's wife's company gave their employees's husband and his friends explicit permission to enter the premises?

    5. Re:Reading, reading, and more reading. by SuperKendall · · Score: 0

      Are you trying to determine if they are vampires?

      Come on, no-one at a company will realistically care who you take with you to look over a new building jus purchased before it's even been cleaned out or renovated.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    6. Re:Reading, reading, and more reading. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 0

      Did his friend's wife's company gave their employees's husband and his friends explicit permission to enter the premises?

      That does NOT make it trespassing. Trespassing works the other way: Unless you cross a boundary, such as a door, fence with signs, or locked gate, then you are not trespassing unless you are explicitly told to leave, and refuse to do so.

      If you enter a building with people that have permission to be there, they open the door for you, and nobody tells you to leave, then you are not trespassing.

    7. Re: Reading, reading, and more reading. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh ok, so Iâ(TM)ll just pay this homeless guy outside to give me a tour. Heâ(TM)s the one trespassing I was invited and wasnâ(TM)t told that I canâ(TM)t be here.

      Sound fucking logic. Youâ(TM)re actually considered trespassing even on someoneâ(TM)s front door step if no one is home. It doesnâ(TM)t work âoeuntil toldâ, itâ(TM)s trespassing until told that you CAN and there.

    8. Re: Reading, reading, and more reading. by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      Says who? You just making shit up? A husband and wife MIGHT own something jointly, but it's not automatic.

    9. Re:Reading, reading, and more reading. by jpaine619 · · Score: 0

      Ever think that "wife's company" might mean the company owned by the wife?

    10. Re:Reading, reading, and more reading. by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      It's blanket statements like these......

      Different states, different rules.. Different countries, different rules.

    11. Re:Reading, reading, and more reading. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Quite.

      Here (Canada), it's not illegal to enter someone's house even if the door is unlocked. It's not "breaking and entering", as an example.

      And police have often just "walked in" to a house when the door is unlocked. There's a lot of history in common law, and in Canada (and I'm sure the UK, where common law comes from), people have for example an 'outer room'. This room is traditionally where people remove their winter boots, yet it's still part of the house.

      But you can't actually knock at the REAL door, and often can't be heard, unless you walk into this outer room. So how can you have a law, making it illegal to enter a house, when it HAS to be legal to enter a house in order to knock on the door?

      Part of this goes all the way back to castles and their ilk, for the "courtyard" of a castle is walled, and "part of the castle"!

      Sure, you can get charged with things too -- but that doesn't mean you'll get *convicted* of things.

      Lastly, intent is a VERY important part of interpreting the law. What was the person's intent? If you can *prove* intent to break some other law, suddenly things are very different.

    12. Re:Reading, reading, and more reading. by ACE209 · · Score: 1

      Ever think that his friend is the owner of RealDolls?

      --
      "we are all atheists about most of the gods that societies have ever believed in. Some of us just go one god further."
    13. Re:Reading, reading, and more reading. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be clearer on the police "walking in".

      http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-46/section-72.html

      Decades ago, during my youth at various parties, the police have often opened the door and peered in, and yelled "Hello!" .. this sort of thing. Now naturally, that gives a wide berth form them to view something amiss. Underage drinking, possession of illegal objects, and so forth.

      And I can imagine why, because they aren't entering the house. They could claim that they knocked, that they through no one heard, and opened the door. Is this against section 72? I can see how it could be argued not.

      I have seen police enter the house completely. Not enter and walk around, but enter and stand just inside the door on a cold, winter day. I'm sure they could argue the same.

      Of course, seeing the police doing something, does not make it legal. Further, police are restricted from doing things that the general public can. They are afforded great powers, and have restrictions on their actions as well. So... I'll take the bit back about police, because things can change a lot in 40+ years.

      Also, the charter of rights and freedoms didn't exist back then, and I can see that affecting things quite a bit.

      But overall? I stand with what I said.

    14. Re: Reading, reading, and more reading. by pslytely+psycho · · Score: 2

      Since you paid him, you are now guilty of conspiracy. Since you don't have permission to be there and you hired him to trespass, and you likely lied to him about it not being a trespass.

      "You're actually considered trespassing even on someones front door step if no one is home."

      That is the most twisted logic I've heard in a while, as you're completely and totally wrong. If I walk up to your door and knock, or ring the doorbell. I am not trespassing. If I go further than that, then I might be trespassing depending upon circumstance (a meter reader for instance is not trespassing walking around the side of your house to read the meter, even if you're not home).
      Your turn, move the goalposts and include a no trespass sign or a locked gate.

      --
      Donald Trump, on a crusade to make Nixon look respectable
    15. Re:Reading, reading, and more reading. by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      They will care if someone is injured. They'll also care if this husband publishes any of those medical details: when the facility was purchased, that woman's company may have assumed responsibility for those medical records. A transfer of responsibility for fiscal records would seem a sensible and common part of the sale of a company, even of a franchise such as a Toys R' Us facility.

    16. Re: Reading, reading, and more reading. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is if they bought it when they are married.

    17. Re: Reading, reading, and more reading. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huge stretch, they didnâ(TM)t buy the company they bought the building...

    18. Re: Reading, reading, and more reading. by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      You're getting "they" deliberately confused with "they" in an attempt to provide a successful response... to a rhetorical and self-evident point. Quit while you're ahead...?

    19. Re: Reading, reading, and more reading. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit.

      The marriage contract I signed says absolutely nothing about my future purchases which I sign becoming the property of a non-signatory.

    20. Re: Reading, reading, and more reading. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nine states say otherwise. You might want to look into that if you ever divorce.

    21. Re: Reading, reading, and more reading. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd bet it doesn't say they're yours exclusively either. The details are in state law or are open to interpretation by the judge in your inevitable divorce proceedings.

    22. Re: Reading, reading, and more reading. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is even a name for it, Community property.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_property

      I know shock and horror your opinion meeting reality and finding out its wrong.

    23. Re: Reading, reading, and more reading. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell that to the divorce lawyer.

    24. Re: Reading, reading, and more reading. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You will only understand after the divorce.

    25. Re: Reading, reading, and more reading. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like you're an idiot who didn't understand what he was signing. Maybe you should have had a pre-nup.

    26. Re: Reading, reading, and more reading. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please throw your Apple garbage in the trash and buy a real computer. Your posts are fucking unreadable.

    27. Re: Reading, reading, and more reading. by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      Excuse me, please, but no. I was referring specifically to "people at a company" from the previous poster, namely the people from the company that bought the old building. I was not attempting to confuse "they" with a different group.

      As things stand, there is no sign that the data has been misused or illegally publicized. But the idea that no one cares, or should care, is a dangerous and mistaken one. Personally, I've been confronted with "what do I do with these records" questions when buying a company. It takes some thought, and some caution, even if the company had already gone out of business.

    28. Re:Reading, reading, and more reading. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, what was I thinking? Breaking the law and acting like a low-class, lowlife is how to be a winner. Thanks for sharing your 15 years worth of life wisdom, brohan.

    29. Re:Reading, reading, and more reading. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong. If you set foot in private or sensitive areas without permission, you are trespassing. It requires nobody to tell you to leave and you can be legally shot and killed in most places for doing it.

      I guarantee that if I caught you in my house I would not ask you to leave, you would be dead.

    30. Re: Reading, reading, and more reading. by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      false, in the United States it absolutely is the default. Ask anyone in a divorce. Look up things before spewing

    31. Re: Reading, reading, and more reading. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is also not automatic that the husband didn't have the authority to grant permission.

    32. Re: Reading, reading, and more reading. by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      Bullshit.. In CA (for one example) what you bring to the table is yours. You only own things jointly if they were purchased AFTER the marriage. You can also exclude a spouse from a purchase made after marriage. Why don't you look things up before spewing?

      My statement is 100% accurate. A husband and wife MIGHT own something jointly and they might not. It's not a mandatory situation.

    33. Re: Reading, reading, and more reading. by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      and anything bought during the marriage, like the property in the article, is of both. which is the default

    34. Re: Reading, reading, and more reading. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They purchased property, not a company. There was no transfer of records. This is actually a common issue for storage units and the like where people will store sensitive records and may become abandoned. It is the responsibility of those who abandoned to secure or dispose the documents.

  4. Reminds me of when we moved into a new office ... by m00sh · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Reminds me of when we moved to a new office at our university.

    The old office used to be a different department and they left behind a cabinet full of documents.

    It was full of files of applicants, those who had applied to the department as faculty and students. Each of these files had all the recommendation letters.

    I read through a whole bunch of recommendation letters to see how people write them. Most of them were really weird and would not be happy if the applicant read it.

    They were not negative but not quite positive either. Just strange mostly.

    I couldn't believe that they had just left confidential documents behind. I tried to get them to retrieve the documents but I got no reply. I was quite furious that I had to deal with their cabinets full of their crap and just left it all outside as trash to be picked up. Who knows who read them and what happened to them afterwards.

  5. CEO should be on trial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes the CEO should be in jail for allowing this to happen. Employees records all over the country being exposed from a failed CEO.

  6. medical records? by ArylAkamov · · Score: 1

    Why do they have their employees medical records?

    1. Re:medical records? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Medical in this context probably means sickness, i.e. how many sick days the employees took, when they took them and the reason given.

    2. Re: medical records? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever heard of self insuring? You fucking moron.

    3. Re:medical records? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd guess it was for worker's comp cases

    4. Re:medical records? by swb · · Score: 1

      I thought this was puzzling, too.

      Best thing I could think of would be paperwork the employee had to fill out documenting a medical condition that interfered with work or resulted from an on the job injury.

      Ordinary medical treatment involving a doctor, I don't know how a specific store location would see this even if TRU had been the insurer of record. Some kind of statement about the employee treatments (using the bizarre, technical coding language of health insurance) may have gone to some TRU home office. It seems like when I use health insurance I get a letter from the insurer telling me what I'm not getting coverage on and then a bill from the provider.

      I'm skeptical that TRU provided that good/comprehensive enough insurance for most employees to begin with. I'd bet most employees (numerically) would have been part time and paying cash, using a spouse/parent's insurance, etc, never even giving TRU a reason to get into the paper flow.

    5. Re:medical records? by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 2

      There could also be reporting of medical history for insurance applications, medical absences, negotiations for insurance disputes, and ADA accomodations.

    6. Re:medical records? by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      workers comp

  7. That’s why by Kohath · · Score: 2

    The last person at that location should set fire to the building.

    1. Re:That’s why by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

      Now don't be jumping to conclusions...

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    2. Re:That’s why by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Funny

      Welcome to Slashdot, Milton

    3. Re:That’s why by Z80a · · Score: 1

      I think it would be a lot saner to just burn the documents.

    4. Re:That’s why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The last person at that location should set fire to the building.

      Nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.

    5. Re:That’s why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      S'cuse me, s'cuse me, I think you have my stapler...

    6. Re: That’s why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's mah staplar, and I'm seerious, I want it back. It's a wed colored Swingline. I will burn dis plasce down. Also mah paystub is still messed up.

  8. Happens all the time.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As someone who was arbitrarily put in charge of "shutting down" a company after they closed their doors, I can attest that there are few guidelines, and few specific instructions.

    In my case, I was told to make backups of all the "important stuff" and send it to the parent company. I was also told to contact all lease companies and tell them to come get their shit.

    Beyond that, I was given no instructions on what to do with paper documents (shred them?), and nobody seemed to give two shits about what happened to any remaining assets.

    I left that company with a new desk and chair for my home office, and a small stockpile of equipment that was off-lease. The rest was left for the landlord of the building to deal with.

    1. Re:Happens all the time.... by Strider- · · Score: 1

      Beyond that, I was given no instructions on what to do with paper documents (shred them?), and nobody seemed to give two shits about what happened to any remaining assets.

      Channel your inner Oliver North and have a shredding party...

      --
      ...si hoc legere nimium eruditionis habes...
    2. Re:Happens all the time.... by shess · · Score: 1

      Beyond that, I was given no instructions on what to do with paper documents (shred them?), and nobody seemed to give two shits about what happened to any remaining assets.

      Channel your inner Oliver North and have a shredding party...

      Yeah, but shredding large volumes takes a lot of time if you don't have an industrial shredder. In a bankruptcy case, nobody gives two shits about this stuff. What are you going to do, sue them? They aren't going to pay for your time to carefully shred everything, they aren't going to pay for a third-party shredding service to bring a truck on-site. My guess is that if you even call and ask them what to do they'll tell you to quit screwing around and get back to work.

  9. Giving Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the employees simply give up

    There are no employees handling the shutting down processes, inventory and cleaning when they have all been thrown out from the back door to the alley within 15 to 30 minutes of the shutting down announcement.

  10. not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Company closes up because bankrupt. Who's going to pay for someone to gather all those files and dispose of them? If there's no money in the bank to pay payroll, you're not going to get newly unemployed people doing it out of the goodness of their heart.

    Typically, this kind of thing comes as a surprise in the field. It's not like the store manager calls employees and says "well, folks, we're closing in a few days, I need you to help pack up" - nope - it's "Don't show up tomorrow, we're out of money and we can't pay you"

    BK companies leave all kinds of stuff behind, particularly if they're in arrears on rent. The landlord padlocks the doors and tries to sell what's left to recover some value. If they left the IRS in the lurch, then the IRS will be their with their padlocks, too.

    1. Re:not surprising by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Given that there was a stockpile of personal information about the employees themselves, perhaps they would have destroyed it out of their own self interest...

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    2. Re:not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chances are, any employees with any sense of self interest had already jumped ship by the time the end came. The ones left holding the boxes of confidential documents were recently hired temp workers. Most stores had two signs in the windows at the end: "Store Closing in X Days" and "Now Hiring!"

  11. It's hard for employees to manage that by damn_registrars · · Score: 3, Insightful

    At the end they're getting paid shit, treated like shit, and they feel like shit. Management often gets canned ahead of time and replaced with management from liquidation outfits, so there is little to no continuity on backend matters. It's unfortunate that it happened but not surprising.

    Hopefully the other stores that are being turned into halloween stores are going to do a better job handling the flotsam.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:It's hard for employees to manage that by rtb61 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The liquidators take liability for disposal, in this case were liquidators appointed, they should be prosecuted for failing to properly dispose of what are by law protected records, especially medical records.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    2. Re:It's hard for employees to manage that by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

      The liquidators take liability for disposal, in this case were liquidators appointed, they should be prosecuted for failing to properly dispose of what are by law protected records, especially medical records.

      They should, yes. Will they though? Most likely not. They'll point the finger elsewhere and it will quickly be forgotten. After all, it would impede profit to go further.

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    3. Re:It's hard for employees to manage that by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      There was a scrapping company due to either destroy or refit the building. They'd not arrived yet.

    4. Re:It's hard for employees to manage that by shess · · Score: 1

      The liquidators take liability for disposal, in this case were liquidators appointed, they should be prosecuted for failing to properly dispose of what are by law protected records, especially medical records.

      Why? As an employee, you now have a contractual agreement with a defunct company. There is nobody left who is responsible for those records. Maybe the facility was resold to someone in the bankruptcy process, but those records are not their responsibility (they now own the facility, they are not a continuation of the business itself).

      This is a general problem with our system. Companies do all sorts of negative things with no provision for cleanup if/when they die. Go out of business with a facility full of unremediated asbestos? Not your problem! Leaking underground fuel tanks? Not your problem!

  12. Re:Reminds me of when we moved into a new office . by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    You probably should’ve reported it to the university itself. At our university, at least, the bureaucrats take their rules and forms very seriously. They like nothing better than to enforce even trivial rules... the sort of breach of trust you describe would probably result in a public flogging.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  13. So somewhat similar but not really to NCIX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When a company goes out, it's not rare for customers/employees data to be later found mismanaged.
    Like recently, NCIX, a defunct computer hardware store, had a massive databreach due to them essentially leaving their old database servers on location in a place they couldn't pay the rent at, so they essentially gave everything to the landlord... Who sold it to people who made use of that data to make a profit by selling it to China.
    This include Social security numbers, past addresses, names and many other information, basically everything you need to steal someone's identity, of their current and past employees. There's even disk images of employees work and home computers in some cases, including compromising pictures, perfect for blackmailing.
    Along with credit card numbers, name, addresses, passwords, email, etc.. of customers.
    All of it in plain text within the databases that they carelessly left out when they went out.

    All this crap should've been shredded in an industrial shredder, instead they literally just gave it away, opening them to serious legal trouble even if they went bankrupt. It's a clear case of complete negligence and wrongdoing.

    1. Re: So somewhat similar but not really to NCIX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Donâ(TM)t forget about the photocopiers as well. Many contain a hard drive containing everything they ever copied.

    2. Re: So somewhat similar but not really to NCIX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depending on make/model, the scratch HDD might be encrypted to prevent such a data dump.

    3. Re:So somewhat similar but not really to NCIX by DogDude · · Score: 1

      opening them to serious legal trouble even if they went bankrupt

      That's not how corporations work in the US. Corporations can just walk away from any and all of their responsibilities.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
  14. That wasn't nearly the worst part by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 3, Funny

    The abandoned records were nothing compared to the shocking sight that was found near the back of the stockroom:

    The rotting body of an emaciated cartoon giraffe, its neck still chained to a standpipe.

    1. Re:That wasn't nearly the worst part by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Scrawled in it's own blood on the wall was 'I don't want to grow up.....'

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  15. Toys R Us Was A Big Donor To Planned Parenthood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they are that stupid about the causes they support why would they be better about protecting data ?

  16. I'd think this is more common than not by RhettLivingston · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In my experience, I've always had to clean out old papers and trash when moving a business or business group into a "new" office. Much of that was just moving a group around within the facilities of a large corporation (one of the Dow 30), but, you'd think that would be better because the folks that moved out weren't losing their jobs.

    I've actually encountered the same thing with houses. I've done some flipping, and it is remarkable how many people leave almost everything.

    One home I rebuilt had been the home of a family with at least two young children. All of the clothes were still there, toys left where they had last been played with, kitchen fully stocked, dishes in the sink, bills in the drawers, all of the normal bathroom stuff in the bathroom, family pictures on the walls and in photo albums, and on and on. In my imagination, I figured they had been in a wreck or something where everyone died. I checked just to satisfy my curiosity and found that they had decided to move to Europe and just abandoned everything they couldn't take with them on the plane.

  17. What!?!?! by grep+-v+'.*'+* · · Score: 1

    Inside they found plenty of hardware left behind

    'Cuse me, I think I hear my mom calling me. I'll see y'all tomorrow -- sorry, going to be somewhat busy tonight.

    --
    If the universe is someone's simulation -- does that mean the stars are just stuck pixels?
  18. Standard employment docs by Solandri · · Score: 2

    Driver's license and Social Security number are the most commonly used documents for the I-9 form. Basically, the government doesn't want you hiring aliens and visitors without a work visa, but don't have a system in place for an employer to verify if someone is authorized to work in the country (is a citizen or has a work visa). Rather than put together such a system, the government requires employers to collect the I-9 - it becomes the employer's proof that they did their due diligence and collected the info the government required of them to "determine" work eligibility. (In quotes because the documents are commonly forged, and the employer can't root out forgeries because they'll get in trouble if they mistake real docs for a forgery.)

    The tax documents are probably the W-4 form. They're used to determine how much of your paycheck is withheld (sent directly to the IRS) for income taxes. If an employee is dishonest or wrong and the incorrect amount is withheld (usually the employee errs on the low side), it gets corrected on April 15. If the employee had too little withheld, they could face fines. So the employer has to keep the W4 on file as proof that the incorrect withholding wasn't their fault, and they did as the employee told them to do. It's a matter that is entirely between the employee and the IRS, but the IRS doesn't want to do it themselves (employee could submit the W4 to the IRS, and the IRS could tell the employer how much to withhold). So they require employers to do it and force them to keep each employee's W4 on file. This one has always baffled me - the IRS verifies it anyway when the employee files their taxes, so it's not like the IRS would have to do any extra work to handle it themselves instead of foisting the job onto employers..

    Both are usually shoved in a filing cabinet and forgotten about, since the government requires you to keep them but they're never used for anything again (unless you happen to be raided by INS or ICE)..

    1. Re:Standard employment docs by SeaFox · · Score: 2

      Driver's license and Social Security number are the most commonly used documents for the I-9 form. Basically, the government doesn't want you hiring aliens and visitors without a work visa, but don't have a system in place for an employer to verify if someone is authorized to work in the country (is a citizen or has a work visa).

      Yes, why doesn't the government have a system like that...

    2. Re:Standard employment docs by m00sh · · Score: 2

      Yes, why doesn't the government have a system like that...

      The E-Verify system has its problems.

      We were forced to use it when we hired international students - basically recently foreign graduates.

      It requires every hire must be subjected to the E-Verify system. You cannot check someone and not others.

      It has some false positives and can delay work. You have to get the green light from E-Verify before the person start the work. If for some reason the e-verify system goofs up (some record some department hasn't updated somewhere), which it did a few times, you have to wait for the system.

      Last, it forces you to agree on a small clause that gives DHS the right to come in and search your office any time they want without any cause.

  19. Re:Reminds me of when we moved into a new office . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Until that university has to shut down, then they won't give a hoot whose records get left behind.

    What you're talking about it self-aggrandizing virtue signaling - they aren't doing it because they believe it's right, they're doing it to draw attention to themselves.

  20. medical records? by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    Why did they have medical records?

  21. Medical records... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why does an employer have access to employees medical records? That seems wrong to me.

  22. Not a Fluke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look at the NCIX Data breach.. So it's not a US Fluke either..

  23. Re:Reminds me of when we moved into a new office . by tquasar · · Score: 1

    I had interview notes from about twenty people. Some were hired, some not.When I was moving to another department I removed some of my notes from the records and took the rest home, saved them for a few months then destroyed them. Didn't want people who followed me in the job to share my opinions with other workers, some don't know what to not say or when to just shut the hell up.

  24. Re:Reminds me of when we moved into a new office . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At our university, at least, the bureaucrats take their rules and forms very seriously.

    Yeah, well I work at a tier one Carnegie institution, and we don’t give a fuck. We’re too busy building sports stadiums and ensuring he have both enough (less qualified) diversity hires as well as enough talentless middle management such that the ratio of manager to employee in some places is 1:2. I call it the PhD ghetto: we need an associate dean of research in biology who knows budget; oh, you have a PhD in history and are a non-white male? Have a job making 120k doing very little. Also, if you’re a minority student let’s admit you with an ACT of 14, and at the one year mark you can fail out with a nice little 20k student loan following you around.

    Meanwhile due to performance based budgeting we have a tremendous number of asses in seats at our chemistry department, yet have had our funds cut every fucking year and rely more on poor adjuncts. Did I mention the equipment the undergrads use is twenty-five years out of date?

    Seriously, where I work they’d either cover a breach like this up, or just laugh it off in an attempt to minimize it. FERPA is a joke, and remember, you as an individual cannot file FERPA complaint, you can only complain to the Department of Education and hope that they do. Some states do have additional laws saying that you can go after a school for data disclosure personally (augments FERPA, not supersedes so there is no supremacy issue), but those are few.

  25. Re:Reminds me of when we moved into a new office . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At our university, at least, the bureaucrats take their rules and forms very seriously. They like nothing better than to enforce even trivial rules...

    My experience is that this is half true. My university's bureaucrats are very glad to enforce rules that prevent someone from doing something. They need only say that something is forbidden, and they get positive reinforcement for doing their job, without any actual effort: they'll never follow up to check that the thing has not been done.

    They're less assiduous when it comes to enforcing rules that require someone to do something. This would involve asking someone to do the thing, checking if it's been done, doing extra paperwork to say that it still hasn't been done ... all very tiresome. Far easier to turn a blind eye.

  26. I'd do the same by DogDude · · Score: 1

    If I got a chance to live in Europe, I'd happy run out the door as fast as I could, and leave all of my shit just where it was, too.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
    1. Re:I'd do the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I had to live in Europe, I'd run out the door and jump off the nearest bridge.

    2. Re:I'd do the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are times I feel the same. If it was just me here, then yes, there are many countries that rate higher than the US on most scales related to happiness that I'd rather be in - though I'd put some consideration into a place with a much lower cost of living and large expat communities such as Costa Rica.

      But, the thought of actually doing it is usually stopped by the whole family thing. Even if I could move all of my family members, then it gets into tearing them away from their family members.

      The idea of giving up and running from my home also turns my stomach a bit - even though I'm pretty sure at this point that it will not be the home of freedom and justice it should be at any point in my remaining years (20ish if I manage to reach average life expectancy in my region). I was raised to believe that the purpose of every generation is to build for the generations that come later. Because of that, the battle can't be fully lost as long as their are generations coming later. If I can be part of keeping the light burning for some future generation, even if it is great-great-grandkids, then that is something.

  27. how to hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I strongly recommend Enrique for great hacking experience, he assisted me in hacking my cheating spouse phone and all social media account remotely without touching his phone ... you can also contact him via:
    Email: collinshackworld @ g m a I l . C o m
    Call/Text: +1( 4 0 9) 9 9 9 - 3 4 7 7
    Whatsapp: +1(4 0 9 )9 9 9 - 3 4 7 7
    Website: w w w. worldinvestigationservice .com

  28. Meh by Scoldog · · Score: 1

    The car dealership I work for bought a car yard that the former owners had bankrupted. Got inside to look around the day we got keys. All the desks/furniture had been removed by the liquidators, but there were boxes of paperwork laying around that had customer info, bank details and financial info in them. There was also a huge box of unissued license plates.

    --
    This space for rent
  29. HIPAA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they have health information due to insurance data, then the liquidators and the last management to leave could be facing HIPAA charges, which have real teeth.

  30. Not surprising from a Property Manager Firm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My company manages properties, and this doesn't surprise me whatsoever. A couple of years ago, a boutique (read: expensive) baby store went under, and apparently didn't give either us or their employees much notice. My wife and I were expecting, so we went to see if we could pick up anything. Not only did we completely furnish our kid's rooms, but the staff left behind pretty much all their computers, and didn't wipe a thing - hard drives completely intact, filing cabinets full. I didn't go through them, but I'd bet there was quite a bit of personal info on there. We destroyed them right away for liability reasons.

  31. Clearly A New Law Is Needed! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IMHO, this just indicates that there is a big need for A NEW (FEDERAL) LAW to make sure proper destruction of all private data whenever any company files for bankruptcy!

    It should not be up to any company itself to decide what to do with employee information etc after a bankruptcy!
     

  32. Weird article to be on slashdot TBF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What are you going to do, enforce laws that make companies protect their employee's data? Sounds very BIG government to me, by Slashdot standards no? I'm sure Toys R Us went broke due to all the RED tape that needs to be cut. Boo, communism. Yay, small government. Yay, racist, psychopathic narcissist fucking russian plants in the white house. This place is fat MAGA neckbeard central.