Slashdot Mirror


Vice President Mike Pence Says Google Should Halt Dragonfly App Development (reuters.com)

On Thursday, the U.S. Vice President Mike Pence weighed in on Dragonfly, a project run by Google to build a censored search engine app for China. He said Dragonfly app would make it easier to track someone's internet searches. From a report: Pence said in a speech that business leaders are now thinking twice before entering the Chinese market "if it means turning over their intellectual property or abetting Beijing's oppression." He added, "More must follow suit. For example, Google should immediately end development of the 'Dragonfly' app that will strengthen Communist Party censorship and compromise the privacy of Chinese customers."

120 comments

  1. I've no problems with this by jd · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As long as that involves a direct order banning illegal bulk collection of data and weakening of any encryption.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re: I've no problems with this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Since you stopped reading the fake news.

    2. Re: I've no problems with this by MetalliQaZ · · Score: 1

      Thou art far less informed than thou thinketh

      --
      "Here Lies Philip J. Fry, named for his uncle, to carry on his spirit"
    3. Re: I've no problems with this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thou art far less informed than thou thinketh

      Folks, leave Early Modern English alone if you fscking cannot get it right. It's "thou thinkest", for heaven's sake. I really am fed up with reading ungrammatical tripe from people who consider themselves extra smart for producing that kind of gibberish. Shakespeare's dead and deserves not letting him spin in his grave.

    4. Re: I've no problems with this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      found the liberal arts major

    5. Re: I've no problems with this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for the down vote VP Pence, certainly THIS will hide your shame from America's eyes

    6. Re: I've no problems with this by sittingnut · · Score: 0

      Remember, forcing rape victims to marry the perpetrator is only bad if the Muslims do it, if it is good Christians who do it then it is all fine.
      Killing gays is fine because the Bible says so, unless it is the Muslims who do it, then it is bad again.

      It is almost as if they are following the same book.

      could you point out christian leaders forcing rape victims to marry the perpetrator. or same leaders saying its all "fine" if some criminal, falsely calling himself to be "christian", tried doing it? etc.

      can you point out where jesus or his disciples said anything of the sort in new testament? or where we can find any doctrine of the kind on the part of any established christian church?

      perhaps you have read something of the sort in jewish bible? are you saying modern judaism practice whatever you misunderstood it said? do point to specifics. because if you can't, you are being anti semitic in the worst way possible.

      or are you trying to force an equivalence where there is none? if so, you must be desperate in the face of facts.

    7. Re: I've no problems with this by jd · · Score: 0

      It was Virginia law until early this year.

      If a child was raped but forced to marry the perp, it wasn't rape under Virginia law.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    8. Re: I've no problems with this by sittingnut · · Score: 1

      link and how and why you consider the law, if it existed, as "christian"? again be specific.

    9. Re: I've no problems with this by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      That Christian one where it is alright to rape some virgin girl, as long as you buy her off her parents for fifty shekels https://www.biblegateway.com/p..., well you are stuck with it as it is legal to hand out a bible which recommends criminal acts to minors. If you tried to do it today it would be criminal but the bible and Christians get away with handing out publications to minors which recommend criminal acts, saying nobody reads it anyhow, is not an excuse ;D.

      The dragonfly app by the way does not make it easier to track people's searches, that is already buried right into the fore of google search and all the other apps they produce. What it does is tailer search results to individual users upon what ever basis goggle corporate deems profitable, with all the evil overtones. What the git really is saying do not develop it for China, develop it for corporate USA to control the peasants in America, the 99% ie it was in regards to, "Chinaâ(TM)s theft of U.S. technology" because American arrogance implies the Chinese are too stupid to invent anything, racist is as racist does.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    10. Re: I've no problems with this by sittingnut · · Score: 0

      That Christian one where it is alright to rape some virgin girl, as long as you buy her off her parents for fifty shekels https://www.biblegateway.com/p..., well you are stuck with it as it is legal to hand out a bible which recommends criminal acts to minors. If you tried to do it today it would be criminal but the bible and Christians get away with handing out publications to minors which recommend criminal acts, saying nobody reads it anyhow, is not an excuse ;D.

      you are free to willfully misunderstand a verse in deuteronomy book in jewish bible to fit your antisemitic agenda. but don't expect others to smile at that.

      you are obviously ignorant how the bible is interpreted by judaism and christianity. not everything in bible is taken literally as you seem to believe due to your ignorance.
      unlike modern judaism, and unlike christianity throughout, lot of leaders and followers in modern islam do take such sayings in the islamic scripture literally. that is the difference.

      i will again repeat the questions you failed to answer-
      could you point out christian leaders forcing rape victims to marry the perpetrator. or same leaders saying its all "fine" if some criminal, falsely calling himself to be "christian", tried doing it? etc.

      can you point out where jesus or his disciples said anything of the sort in new testament? (btw new testament dealing with jesus and his teschings, is the part that chistians follow primarily, since you are ignorant of it, i thought i would point out that fact. ) or where we can find any doctrine of the kind on the part of any established christian church?

      don't try to avoid these questions by turning the discussion to your anti semitic prejudices.

    11. Re: I've no problems with this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you point out in the Necronomicon where it says Google is bad? I didn't think so.

    12. Re: I've no problems with this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe the person was talking about age of consent. Before the law changed in Virginia, the age of consent for children was 13. Thus, any children age 13 to 17 was able to consent (parents forced them to acknowledge) and married to the perp, then it wouldn't be under rape. Though, the Virginia law now has changed the age of consent to 18 (which is good).

  2. Google should be a no-go for govt services by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No government should trust them, they are inherently compromised by the Chinese government.

  3. and apple should give info to the FBI like doChina by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 2

    and apple should give info to the FBI like they do in China

  4. This seems more like a political ploy by rsilvergun · · Score: 4, Informative

    rather than any principled stance. I base that on what little I can find on his voting record.

    Still, the GOP has been pretty pro-surveillance (not that the Dems have been helping in that regard, even Bernie's voted on the wrong side at times). Still, he's back in line. Maybe Pence is. Does anyone have any recent discussion on Pence's stance on stuff like warrantless wiretapping?

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:This seems more like a political ploy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      you're living in the past when CNN were the good guys and the Democrats knew the meaning of the word liberal.

    2. Re:This seems more like a political ploy by markdavis · · Score: 1

      >"Still, the GOP has been pretty pro-surveillance (not that the Dems have been helping in that regard"

      The "pro-surveillance" State is very much bi-partisan. Don't try weakening it a bit with the "have not been helping".

    3. Re: This seems more like a political ploy by Narcocide · · Score: 1

      This shouldn't be modded down. I come from a very strictly religious, Protestant upbringing. They actually think like this. They literally think they can be as evil as their first impulses and knee-jerk reactions dictate because they believe that God will guide their hands towards righteousness.

    4. Re:This seems more like a political ploy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The argument is not between pro-surveillance and anti-surveillance. The government is walking the fine line between doing nothing which would allow it's foreign and domestic enemies to do anything they want or implementing wide ranging surveillance that the citizens feel is too invasive. In comparision the Russian and Chinese governments do anything they want because they don't care what their citizens want.

    5. Re:This seems more like a political ploy by El+Cubano · · Score: 1

      Still, the GOP has been pretty pro-surveillance (not that the Dems have been helping in that regard, even Bernie's voted on the wrong side at times)

      Awwww...you are so cute with your disingenuous characterization of the Democrats!

      Buddy, please. The Patriot Act passed a Democrat majority Senate with a 98-1 vote and a Republic majority House with 70% of House Democrats voting for it. Then the Democrat golden child President Obama signed two extensions of it into law.

      And you say, "not that the Dems have been helping."

    6. Re: This seems more like a political ploy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That isn't Protestantism, unless you're joking.

  5. Re:That's a joke, right? by HundyCougar · · Score: 0

    AHAHAHAHAHAHAH you think it's better where you live???

  6. Uh huh ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "More must follow suit. For example, Google should immediately end development of the 'Dragonfly' app that will strengthen Communist Party censorship and compromise the privacy of Chinese customers."

    Uh huh, sure ... all while being required to help with US domestic spying.

    This isn't a stand of principle, this is saying it's OK to be evil for us, but not for someone else.

  7. He's probably confused by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 2, Funny

    And think they can use it to track his Handmaid's Tale fanfic pr0n searches.

    --
    "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
  8. Re: That's a joke, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Come on, let's get serious.

    The USA has some problems, sure, as do every country. But China is its own level of insane. Censoring half the Web, locking away anyone who believe anything beside communist propaganda, no access to foreign media, blocking vpn websites, torturing falun gong and other religious group, it's absolute bullshit. Also messing with the stability of the region with the south China Sea claims and fucking up Hong Kong and Taiwan to try and turn them into commie States. And that's not even Co sideline the trade war and the new Chinese spy chips discovered in foreign servers.

    Fuck China. I love Chinese culture but there is no culture left in China, now only brainwashing and lies.

  9. Re:That's a joke, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AHAHAH? Why are you screaming?

  10. So let me get this straight. by jellomizer · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    A leader belonging to a political party who opposes government rules and Regulations on businesses.
    Is trying to stop a Business from making and selling a product.
    Because the customer is a country that tries to influence companies to make and not make particular products and services.

    So he is either a Hypocrite because he is pushing political pressure on a business while he stands for the idea there is too much political pressure on companies.
    Or he is a Hypocrite because he is trying to use political pressure to stop a company from doing an action managed by political pressures.

    Or is it he is just annoyed that a LiBeRaL California company is still doing business even during a trade war. Because the Chinese Government was smarter then the Trump Administration, and counteracted tarrifs only on products sold by people who would vote for them.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:So let me get this straight. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Ignoring the politics, do you approve of google working on dragonfly?

    2. Re:So let me get this straight. by ArylAkamov · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're going to a lot of effort to avoid admitting pence did a good thing.
      It's okay. You can say it.
        The world won't end.

    3. Re:So let me get this straight. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I approve of markets doing whatever it is that markets do.

      If there is a problem, it is with the Rule of Law in China, not that fact that someone built a gun...I am sorry, I mean a spy tool.

    4. Re: So let me get this straight. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Politically, if you want credibility on regulating companies or even advising them, you had better be honest about it.

      Pence cannot. He's already supported dictatorships, censorship and surveillance of citizens.

    5. Re:So let me get this straight. by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      I am mixed.
      The Chinese people would be better off with it vs without it. However the tight controls in censoring material means they may not be getting all the ideas and experience needed for a fully informed decision, and gives power back into government trying to stop this.

      However I am not a Chinese Citizen, I am an American Citizen. I can sympathize with the Chinese people but with my right to free speech and my ability to vote. I should be able to express when our government is doing something wrong, or at least showing that it is being inconsistent.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    6. Re:So let me get this straight. by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Not saying it was good or bad. Just inconsistent and unfocused in a particular direction.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    7. Re:So let me get this straight. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He belongs to a party that prioritizes the protection of basic human rights first (among them basic freedoms from government tyranny), and then laissez-faire economics second.

      Your right not to be oppressed by your own government is more important than eliminating government regulation. Political pressure on companies to preserve basic decency and human rights is okay.

    8. Re:So let me get this straight. by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      A leader belonging to a political party who opposes government rules and Regulations on businesses. Is trying to stop a Business from making and selling a product.

      No he's not, he's asking them not to do it. "Trying to stop" would imply he's pushing legislation.

      The current admin doesn't usually get things right. This time the VP's right. Trying to find a way in which it shows hypocrisy by torturing what it is he's doing is showing bad faith and distracts from important issues.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    9. Re:So let me get this straight. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The world won't end.

      Damn! Pence is trying to make that happen - bring on The Rapture. In fact it is the only reason that he supports Trump, it is the fastest way to get the world to end.

    10. Re:So let me get this straight. by kqs · · Score: 2

      He belongs to a party that prioritizes the protection of basic human rights

      They say that "on the internet, nobody knows you're a dog." But your words show that you're a white straight male, probably christian.

      Is marrying the person you love a basic right? Is being able to work, have a house, and buy things a basic right? Cause if you're not heterosexual, that party is pretty sure they're not.

      Your right not to be oppressed by your own government is more important than eliminating government regulation.

      We agree, which is why I don't want the government saying who I can marry.

      Political pressure on companies to preserve basic decency and human rights is okay.

      I'm glad you agree with the MeToo movement. Too bad most in your party don't.

  11. NothingBurger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Yeah, keep wishing princess.

  12. Orange Alert! by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wonder how Pence feels about technology that would allow a political leader to push instant messages onto every single cellular device, allowing citizens no ability to opt out.

    But since he supported giving electro-shock to homosexuals to "cure" them, I think we have a pretty good idea.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Orange Alert! by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      "If this alert were from a real President, you would have received further instructions on..."

    2. Re:Orange Alert! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was in Congress back in 2006 when President Bush signed the executive order to create this system. Maybe he commented.

    3. Re:Orange Alert! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean the technology based on The Communications Act of 1934, which was signed into law by notorious Republican Franklin Delano Roosevelt? You are truly the worst kind of idiot, DopeFatzo.

    4. Re:Orange Alert! by ArylAkamov · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Be honest. No matter what he does, you'll find a way to shit on him.
      You're obsessed and can't help but inject your politics into every post, no matter how far off topic or unrelated it is.

    5. Re:Orange Alert! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By the time Trump is done with his second term, communist will be executed on TV.

    6. Re:Orange Alert! by alvinrod · · Score: 1

      Is it really any different than the usual AC spam on any given story? It's not even unique to Trump since there were 8 years of the same kind of stuff while Obama was president. At least he's willing to tie his account to it so someone can make it easier to ignore him if they want to, which is more than you can say of most AC's that post even worse crap on a regular basis.

    7. Re:Orange Alert! by ArylAkamov · · Score: 1

      I wonder who mods him up sometimes, given that post is completely unrelated to the article and implies political falsehoods.

    8. Re:Orange Alert! by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Be honest. No matter what he does, you'll find a way to shit on him.

      To be fair, I don't always shit on Trump. Sometimes, I just laugh, and sometimes I shrug ruefully. But don't worry, a day will come when Trump is gone and I'll still be here. Then we can go back to dick jokes and ragging on systemd.

      I wonder who mods him up sometimes,

      You don't have to wonder. I have been voted the most-beloved commenter on Slashdot seven years running now. You can look it up. I get great reviews, and my inauguration was the biggest ever.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    9. Re:Orange Alert! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean national emergency alerts like what Obama helped set up, and has only just now been tested?

    10. Re:Orange Alert! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No matter what he does, you'll find a way to shit on him.

      Oh god, to have that opportunity ...

    11. Re:Orange Alert! by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      You mean national emergency alerts like what Obama helped set up, and has only just now been tested?

      It was set up during the Bush administration, but for some reason hasn't been used until now. I wonder why now.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    12. Re:Orange Alert! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Be honest. No matter what he does, you'll find a way to shit on [Pence].

      That's sort of a non-challenge in relation to bottom-dwellers.

    13. Re:Orange Alert! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PopeRatzo has some issues, and if this helps him, I say let him continue.

      I'm a bit biased though... every time I see a Trump-related story I have fun because PopeRatzo is my person Where's Waldo.

    14. Re:Orange Alert! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I wonder why now.

      Because Trump needs to create some emergency in the next month so that he can cancel the upcoming midterms.

    15. Re:Orange Alert! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if that doesn't happen? Will you disappear like the 2012 doomsday preppers?

    16. Re:Orange Alert! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honestly dude, you used to be HILARIOUS. Like, I'd literally LOL frequently at the stuff you'd say. Since Trump won, you've let your funniness wither. We survived G Dubs, we survived obama, we'll survive trump, and whoever is next, etc, etc. Go back to your old self dude.

    17. Re:Orange Alert! by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Honestly dude, you used to be HILARIOUS. Like, I'd literally LOL frequently at the stuff you'd say. Since Trump won, you've let your funniness wither.

      Maybe my sense of humor hasn't changed, but you've lost yours. It's all a matter of perspective.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    18. Re:Orange Alert! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe my sense of humor hasn't changed, but you've lost yours. It's all a matter of perspective.

      Nope, because you admitted so yourself that once Trump is gone we'd go back to dick jokes and mocking systemd. In other words, you admitted that the joke topics you do these days is different from before.

      And different topics are not equally funny, even if presented to somebody whose sense of humor and perspective never changed.

      If you disagree and think joke topics are fungible, next time you make a joke about Trump, Pence, Republicans, or whoever, replace target of ridicule with your own mother.

    19. Re:Orange Alert! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm anti-Trump, but I'd pay good money to see that!

    20. Re:Orange Alert! by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      In other words, you admitted that the joke topics you do these days is different from before

      The topics have changed, but they're still the same. They're dick jokes, but the dick is an orange mushroom.

      If you disagree and think joke topics are fungible, next time you make a joke about Trump, Pence, Republicans, or whoever, replace target of ridicule with your own mother.

      So, you just don't find them funny because they are at the expense of someone you love like a family member. I think you just admitted that Trump is your daddy. And apparently you have forgotten that mother jokes are a staple of Slashdot comments.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  13. Americans don't give a shit about surveillance. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Seriously, they just don't.

    They'll happily fork all their email over to Google, let Facebook mine the everloving shit out of their lives, run everybody's tracking scripts all around the web, put an Amazon Alexa in their bedroom, and install spyware on their phones in exchange for a $0.50 discount on coffee.

    Snowden came along and showed them how much was being collected of their communications, but what did they do? They went right along supporting the companies cooperating with the NSA. They went right along putting Facebook on their phones. They went right along sending unencrypted email.

    And you expect them to care about Google collecting personal data about people in China's searches? They don't even care about Google strip-mining THEIR OWN searches.

    Look I hate it but this horse left the barn a long time ago. People don't give a shit about privacy. Not theirs, and not some poor guy's in China.

    1. Re:Americans don't give a shit about surveillance. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Shut up and give me my pumpkin spice latte!

    2. Re:Americans don't give a shit about surveillance. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't wait to get home and charge my Tesla!

  14. Cant have by DarkRookie2 · · Score: 1

    Cant have Google do what the Gov wants to do.

    --
    http://progressquest.com/spoltog.php?name=Son+Of+Son+Of+DarkRookie
  15. ha! by fattmatt · · Score: 1

    Since when is the US government against tracking of users on the internet. If that were the case they would discontinue their Facebook site.

  16. And meanwhile, Saudi Arabia... by turp182 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Saudi Arabia scores considerably lower when it comes to freedom than China (by aggregate score):
    https://freedomhouse.org/repor...

    I mean, women were just allowed to drive in 2018:
    https://www.npr.org/2018/06/24...

    But they are a favored trade partner focusing on two way oil for weapons deals.

    So we arm nations that oppress their citizens more than China. In 2017, Trump signed a $110 billion military sale agreement with Saudi Arabia:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    What's this about internet censorship? Oh, Saudi Arabia used Secure Computing, a US corporation, to manage country wide internet monitoring and filtering, not just search.

    But oil (and our incessant fear of Iran)...

    --
    BlameBillCosby.com
  17. Alternative may be worse by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    If Google doesn't build their Censor-A-Matic, some other non-US company will likely fill that niche. How is that better? The Chinese gov't will get their desired censorship engines one way or another because they want it and they control China.

  18. Are you fucking kidding? by CaptainDork · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... and compromise the privacy of Chinese customers."

    WHAT ABOUT AMERICA FIRST?

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    1. Re:Are you fucking kidding? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The people who fell for that is another level of stupid.

      Trump has been all about himself all his life. He would sell the Statue of Liberty if he could pocket $10 for himself in the process.
      He also thinks that everything is a zero sum game, so if anyone else benefits from anything he does he will make sure to correct that at all costs.
      Anyone thinking they will benefit from having anything to do with Trump is pretty damn dumb.

      The only ones who have a reason to vote for him is neo-nazis who are willing to screw themselves over as long as some brown people gets screwed over worse.

    2. Re:Are you fucking kidding? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blah blah blah.

      Liberal media - "Oh noz, tariffs". "China is our friend."
      Liberal media - "Why does Pence care about this?"

      blah blah blah

    3. Re:Are you fucking kidding? by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      Nah.

      You're as bad as "they" are, because you're so tribal.

      The facts are that the Democrats did not bother to court the poor, undereducated, evangelical Christian white women of the rust belt.

      Clinton had a shit load of baggage (I voted for her) and Bernie was batshit crazy.

      America has voted and it is what it is.

      I am not going to convert you and you are not going to convert me.

      See you at the polls.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    4. Re:Are you fucking kidding? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      America runs Prism at the center of several tracking tools to compromise the privacy of American citizens.

      Google develops Dragonfly at the center of several services to compromise the privacy of Chinese customers.

      America did come first...

  19. True but for all those problems by rsilvergun · · Score: 4, Insightful

    they still have Most Favored Nation Status from the US...

    I don't think it's that the US is any better than China, it's just that we're wealthier and so our ruling class doesn't have to bother with that sort of thing to keep the working class in line. Go back 50 years and read up on what we did to Unions though. It's the same stuff China's doing. We didn't stop doing that stuff because we became better people, we shipped the factories where that stuff happens overseas.... That didn't really solve the problem of oppression, it just moved it out of sight, out of mind.

    At the end of the day we're all just people, and we're all a week's worth of food away from savagery. The best solution is always to make it so that nobody's getting to that point.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:True but for all those problems by butchersong · · Score: 4, Insightful

      We are not all just people. We're people of different races and those races build societies that reflect their own prejudices. Europeans (even Scandinavians) have an larger preference for individuality. Chinese and Japanese have the opposite preference for conformity. There are strengths and weaknesses to both societies but trying to equate the US treatment of their citizens to the Chinese treatment of their citizens in terms of respect for individual sovereignty... you're not even in the same ballpark -even comparing the US today to modern China or the US 50 years ago to modern China.

    2. Re:True but for all those problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People are people, but China is an example of people wielding a very intense government. Like a US credit score is based on your financial history and ability to repay, with a low credit score you don't have access to good loans.

      In China your social credit score is based on your financial history, purchasing habits, online habits, posts criticizing/supporting the Party, as well as the scores of your friends and family which are all tracked through a mass surveillance system. For example if you protest against the Party, it will not only cripple your score, but also that of your family members and friends. People with bad social credit scores among other things can't get loans, attend good schools and other services, buy train/plane tickets, buy luxury items, have to wait longer in hospitals, and risk being publicly shamed on display boards in the city with their name/picture/what they did wrong.

      That doesn't seem like the "same stuff" to me.

    3. Re:True but for all those problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Europeans (even Scandinavians) have an larger preference for individuality. Chinese and Japanese have the opposite preference for conformity.

      Not really. Europeans had their kings just as Asians had their emperors that the proles conform under. Tribalism is the norm across cultures.

      Let's also not forget that most of the pioneers of collectivist thought are Europeans. The likes of Mao, Pol Pot, and Imperialist Japan learned from western thinkers. In more recent times you have hippies and ideologies pushing stuff often described as being "SJW": feminism, socialism, progressivism, etc.

      The shift towards individualism is a relatively recent thing in the last few centuries. It started in Europe and US, as a move AWAY from all the feudalism and conformity under one catholic church that had been dominant the two thousand years prior.

      Furthermore, we have Europeans/Americans today pushing back on individuality as much as any Asian commie. From the left we have aforementioned SJWs, but we also get them from the right as white supremacists, nationalists, and religious fundamentalists push to restore some kind of unified (read: conform) western identity, whatever that is.

    4. Re:True but for all those problems by markdavis · · Score: 1

      >"I don't think it's that the US is any better than China, it's just that we're wealthier and so our ruling class[...]

      You are kidding right? Do you really believe that? Really? I mean.... really???

  20. Re: the Mueller report must be near by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Right moron, cause Meuler givrs Pence daily updates, Pence knows theyâ(TM)re near. The mind boggles.

  21. Explanation for kids by gDLL · · Score: 1

    Hello,
    this is an adult talking,
    we, the adults, can hold more than 1 thought in our highly advanced brains,
    therefore it's possible to value INDIVIDUAL freedom AND freedom for Businesses and to try to find some practical(REAL-WORLD) status quo.

    best regards!

    1. Re:Explanation for kids by jellomizer · · Score: 2

      Normally this is true, However this administration seems to have lacked Adult complex thinking.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  22. Re:the Mueller report must be near by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know it is the dumbasses like you is the reason why we have the term "Fake News" it is all propaganda. I've talked to a lot of people that vote democratic for years, including people voting for Bernie. All of them say that they had no influence from the "Russians" and voted Trump because they in their hearts could not vote for Hillary, and this included my own mom. My own older brother said he voted for Trump because he hated how the democrats pushed out Bernie with "Fake News"

    Your Fake News is just regarded as lies and is immediately dismissed as such now. You will only get to see Trump impeached in your wet dreams.

  23. Re: That's a joke, right? by pr0t0 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I highly recommend Kishore Mahbubani's Long Now Foundation Talk on China. I am not the expert of eastern geo-politics that he is, so I have no idea if his thinking is correct or not, but it's very interesting.

    He states that China's move to democracy is almost inevitable, but it will take a long time. He said that Chinese officials saw what happened with the collapse of communism in the Soviet Union, going briefly into democracy before Russia emerged with totalitarianism and Putin. They don't want to go down that road. But it's clear that there are many democratic reforms happening in China right now. It's not the China I grew up learning about in the 70's and 80's, and the people of that country are benefiting from those reforms.

    All of that said, they are still a very long way away from what most of us would deem as acceptable when it comes to human rights. I think in 50 years though, China will look very different from both inside and outside their borders.

    --
    I'm sorry, but your opinion seems to be wrong.
  24. Pence is anti free market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any self-respecting conservative will tell Pence to fuck off and let the free market (aka the shareholders) decide what's best for Google.

  25. Re: That's a joke, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not to mention there is a whole generation of Chinese that have no families. No brothers or sisters, aunts and uncles, or cousins. Their family is the Communist State. I urge the Chinese to overthrow the Communist Dictatorship.

  26. Re: That's a joke, right? by lgw · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You forgot Tibet, and the ongoing destruction of Tibetan Buddhism.

    Fuck China. I love Chinese culture but there is no culture left in China, now only brainwashing and lies.

    That was Mao's direct intention: destroy all traditional Chinese culture, along with the traditions. Everything within the state, nothing outside the state, nothing against the state. He created China's "Lost Generation", by encouraging students to kill all their teachers, then shipping all the educated youth off to farms, breaking all methods by which culture is transmitted across civilizations.

    Turns out "no culture" is a bad thing, as anything beyond sociopathy must be learned, and China got a generation of short-sighted greed, pettiness, and poor impulse control (the Baby Boomers have nothing on those guys). Pretty much the opposite of how communes are supposed to work, ironically enough.

    Meanwhile, all over the Chinese countryside you'll find crumbling buildings that were once wonderful temples and the like, but no one cares to maintain since Mao (or at least no one with the resources).

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  27. Re: That's a joke, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In China the free press is considered an enemy of the state. In the USA the free press is considered an enemy of the state.

  28. Re:the Mueller report must be near by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All of them say that they .. voted Trump because they in their hearts could not vote for Hillary, and this included my own mom.

    This is just too hard to believe. While it's easy to believe people would vote against Clinton, it's just too much of a coincidence that so many of them just happened to pick Trump out of all the other names on the ballot.

    Your mom showed wisdom in voting agisnt Hillary and in the same breath you imply she's so overwhelmingly stupid as to vote Trump? Get your story straight! You're implying she wanted to vote against corruption, and so she solved the problem by voting for even more corruption. Uh huh. Suure, that's believable. Tell us more about the weird oxymoronic situations that your mom happens to find herself in, and how people who don't believe in such far-fetched scenarios must be reading "fake news" subreddits.

  29. Pence and Privacy by Tangential · · Score: 1

    Pence voted for the Patriot Act. That tells me all I have to know about his concerns over privacy.

    I basically consider everyone who voted for it a criminal. I know they'll never be prosecuted for such an action but I can at least sentence them to life without my vote. This includes Hillary (but not Bernie.)

    --
    Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of congress. But then I repeat myself. -- Mark Twain
  30. Raise you hand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you believe Google will only use Dragonfly in China... Now raise you hand if you think Google will use Dragonfly in other territories as well.

    Do you think Google's going to develop search surveillance tech, like what's in Dragonfly, and and use it only where they are forced to?

    I don't think so...

  31. Google's involvement by bblb · · Score: 1

    Google's involvement with catering to China's oppressive regulations only underscores their hypocrisy. They try to beat the drum of moral virtue and social justice at home, but they're willing to sell out freedom abroad to make a buck. Google, as huge as they are and as pervasive as their services have become, is missing out on a golden opportunity to take a stand and do something about real life actual tyranny but rather than risking some profit, they'd prefer to sell out abroad and just play along crying about Trump to give fools here in the US the false impression that they actually give a shit.

    1. Re:Google's involvement by eaglesrule · · Score: 1

      At times like this I just recall that McDonald's mascot is a fun loving clown, while the company itself is a conducer for industrial-scale meat production. Walmart's logo is a big yellow smiley face, and Amazon's logo is similarly cheerful, while many of their employees are on food stamps.

      Google needs marking just like every other major corporation that's full of disingenuous suits and MBAs, so there's the source of the virtue signaling. Putting a happy face on surveillance and censorship capitalism was to be expected.

  32. Re: That's a joke, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean when they got rid of serfdom and slavery in Tibet?

  33. Go Back To Plotting WW3 Pence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You aint surviving Trump's fall motherlover!

  34. Re: That's a joke, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't believe that for a minute. Unless there's a revolution, China will keep getting more and more closed. Their leader is consolidating more and more power and they are restricting more and more media and websites. They are also spreading their influence around the world, trying to rewrite event like tianment out of your history books. They also now have high tech solutions, like facial recognition cameras everywhere to control their population, and a whole population addicted to WeChat and baidu so they are being monitor 24/u...

  35. Re:the Mueller report must be near by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > determine if Pence can pardon Trump for state crimes

    Why would Pence do that? Pence believes that God told him he would be President. Trump is the only one standing in the way of his destiny. Then he can bring about The Rapture that he desires.

  36. Re: That's a joke, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aww, feeling left out that we're all talking about Russian trolls? Afraid we've forgotten about hard-working Chinese trolls? Don't worry, Slashdot remembers.

  37. DragonflyBSD name collision by Seven+Spirals · · Score: 2

    DragonflyBSD is cool. I hate how Google likes to take names from other projects without even looking. Then they do some kind of shitty manuever like this and folks think "That sucks!" Well, DragonflyBSD doesn't suck. It's HAMMER file system is very functional and has cutting edge features.

  38. It's got nothing to do with Race by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    it's got to do with external factors. We're all one race: human. Human beings are the same all over. What's not the same is our neighbors, food supply and natural resources. The US has two weak neighbors resulting in little risk of invasion. Is it any wonder we're more individualistic? We can afford to be since we're not under constant threat of invasion. Meanwhile China spent centuries fighting off Mongol hoards (often losing). They needed a more top/down authoritarian system with stronger connections to band together for survival.

    People are people. There's nothing special about one group of them. American Exceptionalism is a myth. We're just the ones that survived WWII intact and got nukes first. If Einstein's dad got that deal in Munich to go through we might all be speaking German right now.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  39. Basic reading comprehension by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You lack it. Would definitely recommend trying to obtain some.

  40. Classic confusion between force and suggestion by raymorris · · Score: 2

    The party thinks, basically, that Washington politicians too often force people do things, or make things illegal. Republicans generally would oppose a federal law making it a federal crime to hit your thumb with a hammer.

    Most Republicans would suggest that hitting your thumb is a bad idea, and would say you shouldn't do that. I think you should avoid doing that != we should make it a federal crime.

    I think this is a good idea != the federal government should force everybody to do this.

    Pence said Google shouldn't help with human rights abuseses in China. He did not propose a federal law making it illegal to provide services in China.

    This is as opposed to Democrats, who don't so much make that distinction. Democrats are more keen on the government forcing you to do whatever Nancy Pelosi wants you to do.

    1. Re:Classic confusion between force and suggestion by dryeo · · Score: 1

      The Republicans are quite happy having laws making it a Federal crime to take substances into your body and are once again busy trying to force it to being international law.
      The party of criminalizing health issues is not for personal freedom, or rather is for the personal freedom of some to remove freedom from others.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    2. Re:Classic confusion between force and suggestion by raymorris · · Score: 1

      I think the feds should be attuned to the way marijuana is still used as a gateway drug and how the drug cartels from Latin America use marijuana to get footholds in states.
      --

      Some factors increase the risk of substance abuse in those years deserve emphasis. Casual attitudes toward marijuana and minorsâ(TM) access to cigarettes raise the likelihood that teenagers will make a sad progression from cigarettes to marijuana to more serious drug use and earlier sexual activity
      --

      I donâ(TM)t think that you can legalize small amounts for possession, but those who are making so much money selling, they have to be stopped. They canâ(TM)t be given an even easier road to take, because they will then find it in their interest to addict even more young people. Mexico didnâ(TM)t have much of a drug problem before the last 10 years, and you want to keep it that way. So you donâ(TM)t want to give any excuse to the drug traffickers to be able legally to addict young people.

      --

      I don't think we should decriminalize it.
      --

      Those are some of Hillary Clinton's comments on federal marijuana laws. Like Ms. Clinton, most Republicans do understood that drugs, especially crack and meth, have major negative impacts on entire communities, so it's factually not an issue which affects only the person who decides to do drugs.

      If you read the Republican and Democrat party platforms, they say almost the same things about drugs, including marijuana, but say them in a different order. For example, both support drug courts, which are specialized programs to encourage drug offenders, especially hard core addicts, to get treatment. The Republican phrasing says the courts should order drug addicts to get treatment, the Democrat phrasing says addicts should get treatment, ordered by the courts. Mostly the same policies, phrased with a tone for those who aren't so concerned about the actual policies.

  41. Re: That's a joke, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The difference is that China normally contains their level of insane within their own nation, and doesn't export it. US on the other hand exports their level of insane and destabilizes many parts of the world. Which nation has caused more suffering to the world over the last few decades?

  42. Powerfully Conflicted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When this Administration does something good, I find myself deeply confused. Was it an accident? Did Pence and Trump fight and this was Pence's way of getting revenge? Did Pence fight with his wife and come to work flustered? Did Pence accidentally drink regular instead of decaf coffee and get all chippy?

    And then I think, "No, this is another Trump Copenhagen moment." He will eventually release a statement saying that, "In a recent statement I left out a word. Google should immediately not end development of the 'Dragonfly' app. They should not end development. I think that clears that up."

    We then parse the new statement, coming to a mind-boggling array of different and often contradictory explanations. The result being that we are all still confused, but a different kind of confused!

  43. Re: That's a joke, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry you got to provide more evidence than just "What about Tibet!". I mean actual analysis, and not simply some crap from outlets like HRW or RFA. But the getting rid of serfdom and slavery is true. Even the Dalai Lama admits there was much in the previous Tibetan society that needed to change.

  44. It's the Russian trolls again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure thing Vlad. If you expect any of us to believe anyone actually voted for Trump you just reveal yourself to be yet another Russian troll.
    Fact: Nobody actually voted for Trump because that would be so stupid. Anything you see suggesting Trump is the POTUS is just Russian propoganda fake news amplified by Russian trolls.

  45. Yeah, yeah I do. by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    As little as 100 years ago we had all the problems China had except mass surveillance, and the only reason we didn't have that is that telecom didn't really exist 100 years ago. Workers were barely paid and worked 60+ hours a week and if you complained you were murdered. This is all pretty well documented. What changed was after WWII American workers had solidarity. Just about everyone fought or lost someone in the war. Plus losing several million working age men helped thin the herd.

    But what did _not_ change is human nature. We're no more or less human than the Chinese. That goes for all the flaws everybody has. We're not better than than Chinese, and if we're not careful then as soon as money gets a bit tighter the ruling elite will come down on the working class. The real one, e.g. the billionaire class, not the "elites" Fox News talks about in the form of scientists, teachers and professors...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  46. One more thing I should add by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    why in the name of God do people forget America's history so easily? It's not like it's hard to find out in a post internet age. Do we really need to cling to that happy world were Columbus discovered America, George Washington didn't own slaves and the railroads weren't built in conditions worse than slave labor? What do we think that'll get us?

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  47. I stand by my comment by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    the Dems have some stinkers in their party (Pelosi & Schumer especially) but there's a core there that's salvageable. I can't say the same for the GOP.

    That's not blind hate either. I've got pretty solid evidence to back it up. I can't name a single GOP candidate who refuses corporate PAC money. They killed Net Neutrality first chance they got. Their health care system almost killed a buddy of mine who's type-I diabetic (they took away his insulin, literally because they didn't want to pay for it, and he only got it back when Obamacare kicked in and Obama threatened to pull the old people's Medicare money if Medicaid wasn't funded). Their pointless wars have left my country in massive debt. And they just let PR twist in the wind for politics.

    Over and over again the GOP screws me and mine. The Dems occasionally stand up for me and mine when they're not getting bought off by mega corps. The GOP is objectively in favor of the mega corps every step of the way. I'm sorry man, but there comes a time when you need to face facts. Both sides are not the same. One is objectively worse. And as funny as the "Vote Cthulhu" bumper sticker is it's not really a sound voting strategy...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:I stand by my comment by El+Cubano · · Score: 1

      And they just let PR twist in the wind for politics.

      I am just going to take a stab in the dark and guess that you do not have any family in Puerto Rico or actually even know anybody there. The problems with Hurricane Maria response were much more to do with problems arising from local politics than with any shortcoming on the part of the federal government.

  48. Some mighty fine victim blaming there by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    while also following the Trump party line of blaming the local government.

    We're talking about an island of 3 million vs the United States Government. The US Gov'ts response should have dwarfed any mistakes made by local staff. It didn't because, well, we put people in charge who don't believe in government. So they screw it up. Badly. The only reason they didn't screw up in Florida is that's a swing state and nobody fucks with a swing state, so their usual chronyism gets put on the back burner.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Some mighty fine victim blaming there by El+Cubano · · Score: 1

      We're talking about an island of 3 million vs the United States Government. The US Gov'ts response should have dwarfed any mistakes made by local staff. It didn't because, well, we put people in charge who don't believe in government.

      Wow. I don't even understand the mental contortions you put yourself through. You obviously know next to nothing about Puerto Rico, so I will help you out, inform you a bit to help you not be ignorant, and I will recommend that you stop making a fool of yourself.

      The infrastructure in Puerto Rico has been a dumpster fire for decades. Power, roads, everything, except for maybe the areas in around the touristy part of San Juan and the part in and around the Navy base. It has been nothing but local political and fiscal mismanagement since just about forever. Then Hurricane Maria came in and finished the job. Now, and this seems to be the part that is causing you a problem, it is simply not possible for a disaster response, no matter how large, to correct 40+ years of infrastructure neglect. I am not engaging in victim blaming here; I am simply pointing out that blaming the federal government for doing the best possible job given the circumstances (which included active resistance from the local politicians) is disingenuous.

      So they screw it up. Badly. The only reason they didn't screw up in Florida is that's a swing state and nobody fucks with a swing state, so their usual chronyism gets put on the back burner.

      You seriously must jump at every shadow you see. The reason the relief outcome in Florida was good compared to the relief outcome in Puerto Rico has everything to do with Florida typically sustaining hits from multiple hurricanes per season and having infrastructure that accounts for that. I would expect that if Florida had mismanaged their infrastructure and allowed their public utility to become insolvent to a point comparable to what Puerto Rico had done, that the response would have been vastly different. Especially considering that something like 3 times as many Floridians were affected by Irma as Puerto Ricans were affected by Maria. Incidentally, the governor of Florida mobilized 7,000 national guard troops (apparently, the entire Florida national guard) in the days following the storm there. As far as I can tell, the governor of Puerto Rico did not do the same, only activating something like 1/3 of the Puerto Rico national guard. Sounds like there was quite a bit local mismanagement going on there.

      Of course, the only answer that fits your preconceived notion is that Trump is evil and he deliberately plotted to snub Puerto Rico because he could afford to politically and was "good" to Florida to score political points. Oh well. I don't know why I am even wasting my time.

  49. Re: That's a joke, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hate Chinese on a racial basis alone. Those slanty rice eyes and rice bowl haircuts and the ching chong chung lingo turn my stomach.