Slashdot Mirror


New App Lets You 'Sue Anyone By Pressing a Button' (vice.com)

Jason Koebler writes: Do Not Pay, a free service that launched in the iOS App store today, uses artificial intelligence to help people win up to $25,000 in small claims court. It's the latest project from 21-year-old Stanford senior Joshua Browder, whose service previously allowed people to fight parking tickets or sue Equifax; now, the app has streamlined the process. It's the "first ever service to sue anyone (in all 3,000 counties in 50 states) by pressing a button."

105 comments

  1. First Sue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pressing it now!

    1. Re:First Sue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      I'm suing creimer for emotional distress after seeing his microcock after he stripped naked.

    2. Re:First Sue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm suing creimer .. after he stripped naked.

      Yet another case of "be careful what you wish for."

  2. I'm sure this won't be abused by sheramil · · Score: 1

    The Sovereign Citizen movement is going to love this.

    1. Re:I'm sure this won't be abused by Gilgaron · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I suppose the pay version of the app will let you respond to dismiss the suit with prejudice. Or multiple tiers of payment level that get you access to better written boilerplate so you can beat the app users on the lower tiers... I guess that's basically how the legal system works anyhow.

    2. Re:I'm sure this won't be abused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm fairly certain they will actually hate it.

      "*yelling at app* What do you mean what I did was illegal and I have no recourse??? I am a Sovereign Citizen!!! Why are you not taking that into account you stupid piece of commie shit?!??"

    3. Re:I'm sure this won't be abused by Drethon · · Score: 4, Funny

      The Sovereign Citizen movement is going to love this.

      Can I use the app to sue the app?

    4. Re:I'm sure this won't be abused by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Will there be a counter app to defend yourself from a Law Suit.
      A key part of the Justice System is the Idea of Justice, not just blindly following the laws, which I feel today has sadly been ignored.
      A law could say you could be fined so much for a violation of a law, however justice needs to take a look on why the law was violated and if it is just to be punished for the violation of the law or at the said amount.

      However in today society too much of the revenue for the government is from fines, and they are factored in the budget. Giving intensive to hurt people unjustly.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    5. Re:I'm sure this won't be abused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      intensive != incentive

      I'm going to sue you!

    6. Re:I'm sure this won't be abused by sheramil · · Score: 2

      Yes, but then the app can sue you, or at least sue your app, leading your app to sue their app in an appy loop of appy app apps.

      Apps!

      Perhaps the whole legal system will devolve into some kind of app-based card trading game, or if someone sues you, you can send Charmander in to court to fight for you.

    7. Re:I'm sure this won't be abused by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      Sovereign Citizen movement

      I had to look that up. Now I have a bruise on my forehead from *facepalm*ing so hard. There are actually people in this country who believe that nonsense? Do they actually believe, for instance, that they can get away with murdering someone, so long as they have a 'justification' for it?

    8. Re:I'm sure this won't be abused by StuartHankins · · Score: 1

      Depending on who's involved, I might pay a few dollars to watch Charmander have a go at them. Maybe that can be the new basis upon which lawsuits are settled, a portion of the pay-per-view earnings. I'm not sure if this pushes us toward Mad Max or more towards Idiocracy, lately I feel as if I'm living in both worlds.

    9. Re:I'm sure this won't be abused by Drethon · · Score: 1

      Yes, but then the app can sue you, or at least sue your app, leading your app to sue their app in an appy loop of appy app apps.

      Apps!

      Perhaps the whole legal system will devolve into some kind of app-based card trading game, or if someone sues you, you can send Charmander in to court to fight for you.

      Maybe we can create a recursive loop that will destroy the whole law suit system!

    10. Re: I'm sure this won't be abused by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      You need to search for them on YouTube. Instead of facepalming you'll be laughing your ass off.

    11. Re: I'm sure this won't be abused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Self defense is justification

    12. Re:I'm sure this won't be abused by kurkosdr · · Score: 1

      These people live for the moment they can convince a judge they have the right to walk on US soil without being bound to any state or federal law. In their fantasies, they come up with such a carefully worded defense that a judge throws his hands up in the air and says "this guy got us, the state cannot use their monopoly of force to collect the taxes that pay my salary as a judge, shut the whole thing down!".

    13. Re: I'm sure this won't be abused by Xenx · · Score: 1

      If it's truly self defense, then it isn't murder. I mean, you still killed someone... but it wouldn't be murder. That doesn't mean there couldn't be murder charges brought against you, or that you cannot be found guilty of murder in court.

    14. Re:I'm sure this won't be abused by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 2

      I have a neighbour called Susan, who's a native American sous chef. Can I use the app to sue Sue? As she's a Sioux, would I then sue Sue the Sioux? Its over her cooking, so I'd be sueing Sue the Sioux over being a sous.

    15. Re:I'm sure this won't be abused by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Sure, if it suits you.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    16. Re:I'm sure this won't be abused by TheCastro1689 · · Score: 1

      I mean, it is a conflict of interest. Kind of like how insurance companies try really hard to avoid paying out claims.

    17. Re:I'm sure this won't be abused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that's why the "Everyone's A Vexatious Litigant" app is being developed right now.

      With this app, you can have any court in any county, state, or district declare any user of the "Sue Anyone" app a vexatious litigant and require them to obtain the court's permission to sue.

    18. Re: I'm sure this won't be abused by kurkosdr · · Score: 1

      Well duh. What makes those people think that the government, and by that I mean any of the 3 branches, will relinquish the power they spend billions every year to maintain? Even if they manage to find some hole in the law, which in itself is pretty unlikely because the legislative branch has made sure this part of the law is airtight, the law cannot be "hacked" like code can because judges are not robots and they will never set a precedent of "sovereigns", "footles" (freemen on the land - FOTL) and whatnot to secure a win and chose to not be bound by state it federal law. Even a nerd like me, with people not being my strong suit, can think as far.

  3. Time to incorporate by rickb928 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Own nothing.

    Control everything.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    1. Re:Time to incorporate by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      We had this in the UK for maybe two decades now, although the Small Claims Court goes back further. You submit a simple online form and pay the fee (last time I checked it was £30, which the other party pays if you win).

      You can use it to claim money from anyone or any organization for any reason. It's largely risk free, you don't need a lawyer (the judges are generally sympathetic and they keep the procedural stuff to a minimum) and if you lose you don't normally have to pay the other party's costs. There are exceptions if your claim was completely ridiculous but they are fairly rare.

      It's very useful for dealing with parking fine scams and companies that rip you off. I've used it with Intel over their Meltdown/Spectre flaws, and against the Royal Mail for losing my package and then trying to weasel out of paying compensation. I'm currently looking at options for dealing with PayPal, but the Information Commissioner takes a while to sort out the international GDPR violations that need to be resolved before I can proceed.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  4. With great power... by QuadEddie · · Score: 2

    So, do you just start the app, point it at someone and push?

    1. Re:With great power... by 110010001000 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Actually you need to fill in the details, then it fills out and downloads a form for you, then you need to print it out, then you need to submit it to the courthouse, then you need to appear in court. But the downloading step requires you to push a button. The AI does the rest. Except for the filling in the details, downloading, printing out the form, submitting to the courthouse and appearing in the courthouse. The AI does pre fill out the form for you though. Pretty amazing stuff.

    2. Re:With great power... by DarkOx · · Score: 4, Informative

      So its basically TruboTax for small claims cases. 1993 called and they'd like their definition of amazing back.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    3. Re:With great power... by 110010001000 · · Score: 2

      Completely different. It uses IBM Watson to fill out the form for you. And that is AI, as well all know. TurboTax just uses regular old boring programming to fill out forms.

    4. Re:With great power... by magarity · · Score: 2

      then you need to print it out, then you need to submit it to the courthouse, then you need to appear in court.

      Unfortunately for everyone on the end of a frivolous suit made even easier by this, they have to appear in court too.

    5. Re:With great power... by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      Oh good so in other words you $30 investment in Turbo Tax means the fields are at least correctly mapped from the interview to the form; and verified by humans. Meanwhile with this a computer that does not really "understand" has done it and it might be mostly right most of the time if you are luck. Oh well you get what you pay for I guess

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    6. Re:With great power... by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      So you are saying that their is still time to apply for a patent for a single click litigation application?

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    7. Re:With great power... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then what other app does the job better? Certainly you've seen one otherwise you wouldn't have made such a comment. Mind sharing the name of it?

  5. Jurisdiction. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can I sue a mega-corp that's incorporated in another state in my state?

    I recall briefly looking into this after the equifax breach, and suing them myself in small claims court. It came down to a matter of whether I had the right jurisdiction to sue them, since they aren't incorporated in my home state, and I'm not going to fly to another state just to sue them.

    1. Re:Jurisdiction. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you try Browder's other app for that?

      R O

    2. Re:Jurisdiction. by Comrade+Ogilvy · · Score: 1

      Most big corporations are incorporated in Delaware, and have their actual headquarters somewhere else, e.g. Silicon Valley. In general a state court or federal court will accept jurisdiction if there is "significant" commercial presence within the region.

      Obviously it has to be possible or there would not be favorite courts for, say, plaintiffs filing suits over patent violations.

      If you, say, bought a widget via Amazon from a non-big business in another state, I have my doubts that things will work out for you though.

      (IANAL, of course.)

  6. Bummer - won't work by 110010001000 · · Score: 2

    I just tried to download it (I am thinking of suing people). Unfortunately my iPhone is a 4s and it needs iOS 11.0. How can I sue anyone if I can't even afford to upgrade my 4s? Truly the system is stacked against people like me.

    1. Re:Bummer - won't work by nospam007 · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Unfortunately my iPhone is a 4s and it needs iOS 11.0. How can I sue anyone if I can't even afford to upgrade my 4s? Truly the system is stacked against people like me"

      1. Buy an iPhone XS.
      2. Sue Apple
      3. Return Xs
      4. Profit

    2. Re:Bummer - won't work by 110010001000 · · Score: 2

      Good thinking. I should get all my advice from Slashdot from now on.

    3. Re:Bummer - won't work by magarity · · Score: 3, Funny

      Good thinking. I should get all my advice from Slashdot from now on.

      Ye gods, no, please, not all your advice. Only get all your LEGAL advice from Slashdot.

    4. Re:Bummer - won't work by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the advice. What could possibly go wrong?

    5. Re:Bummer - won't work by nitehawk214 · · Score: 2

      You should sue the maker of the app to support your phone.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    6. Re:Bummer - won't work by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      Good thinking. I should get all my advice from Slashdot from now on.

      That's what I do, and so far it's worked out gr&*$&%*@# NO CARRIER

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    7. Re:Bummer - won't work by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Is this 1998?

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    8. Re:Bummer - won't work by pslytely+psycho · · Score: 1

      No, you should only get your LEGO advice here.

      Speaking of which, should I get the Kessel Run Millennium Falcon or the Join The Rebel Alliance set?

      --
      Donald Trump, on a crusade to make Nixon look respectable
    9. Re: Bummer - won't work by houghi · · Score: 1

      If you want my advice, nothing.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    10. Re:Bummer - won't work by Cid+Highwind · · Score: 1

      1998 is like September, or high school - it never *really* ends.

      --
      0 1 - just my two bits
    11. Re:Bummer - won't work by apoc.famine · · Score: 2

      I'm not sure how to do that. It would be really helpful if someone made an app to do it for me.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    12. Re:Bummer - won't work by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ye gods, no, please, not all your advice. Only get all your LEGAL advice from Slashdot.

      Also advice on women. Slashdot’s got a lot of users knowledgeable regarding women.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    13. Re:Bummer - won't work by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

      Any attempt to arrest a senior OCP employee results in shutdown

      --
      Nullius in verba
    14. Re: Bummer - won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NEVER take any advice from ANYONE else. ...now, take my advice and don't take it.

    15. Re:Bummer - won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why a contextually insignificant year like 1998? Why not 1988 when such a message would have been more commonly seen.

    16. Re:Bummer - won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good thinking. I should get all my advice from Slashdot from now on.

      That's what I do, and so far it's worked out gr&*$&%*@# NO CARRIER

      Send this, it will help you get back online +++ATH0

    17. Re:Bummer - won't work by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Ye gods, no, please, not all your advice. Only get all your LEGAL advice from Slashdot.

      Also advice on women. Slashdot’s got a lot of users knowledgeable regarding women.

      Oddly enough, some of the best advice on meeting women as a geek came from /. (McGrew IIRC) but this was many, many years ago.

      Modern ./ couldn't find their sisters tits with a flashlight and an up pointing arrow around her naval.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  7. it's a litte more than just push a button by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    you have to feed in all sorts of details and mail the documents to the appropriate place and you may end up being called to court... but with the push of a button it seems anyone can start the process

    1. Re:it's a litte more than just push a button by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      "you have to feed in all sorts of details and mail the documents to the appropriate place and you may end up being called to court... but with the push of a button it seems anyone can start the process"

      It begins...

      Soon millions of lawyers will die from hunger. Can't wait.

    2. Re:it's a litte more than just push a button by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      No the number of frivolous claims will go up and they will probably make more defending the people who have frivolous claims filed against them using the app.

    3. Re:it's a litte more than just push a button by pslytely+psycho · · Score: 1

      Indeed it does begin.
      The court system is already overburdened by frivolous lawsuits, in a year or two you perhaps won't be able to get a court date within your lifetime.

      Unfortunately instead of starving liars....err,...lawyers I fear it may cause a population explosion of lawyers.
      Multi generational lawsuits anyone?

      --
      Donald Trump, on a crusade to make Nixon look respectable
  8. God love Hamerica (from the back) 13. times. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, Hamerica is a great country. For lawyers, maybe.

  9. But I think it still requires a reason ... by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    ... to sue Ben Affleck . I think my rights might still not be fully realized.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  10. Was this really needed? by anegg · · Score: 2

    Does the United States really need a service that makes suing people easier? Automation that removes "natural" limits of process rates (like the time/effort to file a suit) often cause disruption in other parts of the system that haven't evolved to handle the load that can be presented once the "natural" limit is removed. Or perhaps this was the intent?

    1. Re:Was this really needed? by 110010001000 · · Score: 2

      It isn't really for suing. It is for challenging tickets, etc in small claims court by pre-filling out forms for you. The app developer is good at marketing though.

    2. Re:Was this really needed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does the United States really need a service that makes suing people easier?

      The United States doesn't need 99.99% of the stuff coming out of Silicon Valley to begin with. For the most part tech ran out of truly good ideas a decade or two ago. Now it's all just incremental convenience improvements, and about the only thing they do well is increase social isolation (why ever leave your house?) and make people more depressed.

    3. Re:Was this really needed? by sjames · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it will finally force a needed change. Once a suit is filed, but before the defendant gets involved, a judge should determine if the suit has any merit on it's face. If not, the suit is squashed and the would-be defendant just gets a letter telling them who tried to sue them and for what.

    4. Re:Was this really needed? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      It's a fine balance between not wanting frivolous lawsuits flying all over the place and the fact that some companies rely on people not suing them as part of their business model. Parking fines are a good example, often they are bogus but many people just pay up because they don't know they can just file a lawsuit and it will magically go away.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  11. Will there be a counter-sue button by DarkOx · · Score: 1

    I wonder if there will be counter-sue for barrarty feature.

    --
    Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    1. Re:Will there be a counter-sue button by chill · · Score: 1

      Isn't that covered under insurance fraud?

      Barratry: fraud or gross negligence of a ship's master or crew at the expense of its owners or users.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    2. Re:Will there be a counter-sue button by sjames · · Score: 2

      Second definition:

      vexatious litigation or incitement to it.

  12. (rolls eyes) by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    While I really admire their parking ticket and flight refund finder....I'm not so high on this one.

    Yes, because the ability to sue people at the press of an app button is what our legal system needed.

    --
    -Styopa
  13. apple sure does like to sue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and promote suing now.

  14. This is the App for me. by commodore64_love · · Score: 3

    I'm so tired of businesses thinking they can screw-over customers & get away with it. I'd also like to sue the telemarketer that keeps calling my cellphone every day, even though I told them "Put me on you Do Not Call list". Per US Law if they continue calling, then they can be fined in small claims.

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    1. Re:This is the App for me. by sl3xd · · Score: 1

      So file the complaint with the FTC, and give the Government their chance at collecting the $20k fine per incident.

      --
      -- Sometimes you have to turn the lights off in order to see.
    2. Re:This is the App for me. by sl3xd · · Score: 1

      Correction: It's the oddly-specific $41,484 per call

      --
      -- Sometimes you have to turn the lights off in order to see.
    3. Re:This is the App for me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want the government to collect 20k even less than you want a robocall then what?

    4. Re:This is the App for me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get some Jolly Roger bots to answer the telemarketers for you.

    5. Re:This is the App for me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why does the government get the fine? Shouldn't the aggrieved party get the compensation?

      This is why we have inequality. The government and lawyers get compensated for *our* pain. Best case scenario even.

    6. Re:This is the App for me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...calling my cellphone every day, even though I told them "Put me on you Do Not Call list". ...

      Next time, try "your"

    7. Re:This is the App for me. by Hallux-F-Sinister · · Score: 2

      The govt should split that with you, 50-50.

      --
      Our reign has gone on long enough. Indeed. Summon the meteors.
    8. Re: This is the App for me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should be glad you're even mentioned in the businesscase!

  15. Torts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do Not Pay, a free service that launched in the iOS App store today, uses artificial intelligence to help people win up to $25,000 in small claims court.

    Great, I can't wait to see people being sued for tortious litigation.

    Go ahead, click that button on that free service, and then wait until you get your ass handed to you by a judge.

    I recommend that Joshua Browder be the first target of this, because he's basically created a tool to submit torts which have a good chance of having no legal basis. So one hopes he has some liability here.

  16. Forgot to mention block chain! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Will not use.

  17. An app for the poor who own iphones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone else find this ironic that its designed to help the underserved of society while simultaneously limiting thier audience to only people who can afford iphones?

    1. Re:An app for the poor who own iphones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple offers cheap enough financing that even someone on food stamps could afford an iPhone. Granted, it means paying more over the course of ownership, but even poor folks can afford the monthly installments.

  18. PROUD TO BE AN AMERICAN!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is so awesome I can't even begin to describe. I can't wait to SUE ALL THE PEOPLE for every little thing I can imagine. Forget civility, compromise, and working things out together, just go STRAIGHT TO COURT! What could be more American than abandoning 5000 years of societal development and making the nuclear option the only option???

    WAY TO GO AMERICA!!! YOU ARE NOW OFFICIALLY GREAT AGAIN!!!

  19. "America! ... F*** Yeah ! " by TheStickBoy · · Score: 1

    - Team America: World Police
    I couldn't help but hear this as soon as i read the title

  20. Re: nuclear option by originalGMC · · Score: 1

    There's an app for that!

  21. How does it serve the complaint? by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

    To sue someone, you must serve them with the court papers to let them know you are suing them. Does it hire someone for you?

    1. Re:How does it serve the complaint? by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 2

      Uber's next business plan!

  22. Gross by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gross.

  23. Doesn't really matter much by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    with the way arbitration has been enshrined in law (and upheld by our Supreme Court in clear defiance to due process protections in the constitution thanks to a pro-corporate SCOTUS) it doesn't help much. I guess you can sue random Joes but that's generally pretty worthless unless you're a big company looking to suppress something, and in that case what use do you have for an app? You've got lawyers on retainer.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  24. The Ts & Cs you signed by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    when you bought virtually anything of substance from a merchant will have an arbitration clause. If you're in the US our Congress just passed a law that makes arbitration legally binding (it used to be you couldn't sign away due process rights). Our Supreme Court upheld the law thanks to a conservative majority.

    Sorry my friend, but this app is useless as a tool against businesses.... The moral of the story is elections have consequences.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:The Ts & Cs you signed by commodore64_love · · Score: 2

      Arbitration clauses don't stop you from rejecting the Arbitrator's solution & going to court.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
  25. could have done without the click-bait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do Not Pay, a free service that launched in the iOS App store today, uses artificial intelligence to help people win up to $25,000 in small claims court.

    "New appity app app app! With just one click, you could win up $25,000!"

  26. Sounds great ... just don't use it against me ! by micahraleigh · · Score: 0

    People don't realize how mortal they are.

  27. This is why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll probably never travel to the US again.

  28. Filing is no big deal, collecting is the problem by Pharmakeus+Ubik · · Score: 2

    I filed against my former landlord for keeping my deposit without a walk through, violating both the lease and local rental law. I was awarded the value of the deposit, plus 200% by the judge. Since this scofflaw has decided to ignore the court's judgement, I have to serve him again before I can get any discovery of his bank accounts or place a lien on his property. He's had a fence built so process servers can't get to his front door without trespassing. Next step, the servers want to charge me $125/hour to stake out his place. He's now moved out and appears to be living with relatives, so I can't track him down. The burden on the victor can be too high for justice to actually be served.

  29. Aww, maaannn... by Hallux-F-Sinister · · Score: 1

    I hafta like, press a BUTTON?

    WHY cant it jus be liek... automatic?

    --
    Our reign has gone on long enough. Indeed. Summon the meteors.
  30. The Secrets of the Temple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SECRETS OF THE TEMPLE: How the Federal Reserve Runs the Country. William Greider (1988?)
    There is a quote in that book, a little gem before the full text. I forget the exact wording. A Big Powerful Banker Type Person was asked, "Why don't you or you colleges run for political office?"
    His reply:
    "When it is in our interest to be in power, we are in power. When it is not in our interest to be in power, we are not in power."

  31. Gross mischaracterization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IIRC this is for BS parking tickets and such, not lawsuits as a service, unless they pivoted.

  32. No it doesn't by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

    Unless it's in the same sense that a typewriter lets you "sue anyone" by pushing buttons:

    After that, Do Not Pay draws up documents specific to that legal area, and fills in the specific details. Just print it out, mail it to the courthouse

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  33. Legal issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wouldn't this be considered "unauthorized practice of law"? I know if South Carolina that is not legal: https://www.scbar.org/public/get-legal-help/problems-your-lawyer/unauthorized-practice-of-law-committee/ . IANAL, but I work for some.

    1. Re:Legal issue by Zmobie · · Score: 2

      I think it would all be considered pro se representation since it isn't actually giving legal advice necessarily just providing the forms and scripts for one to do it themselves. Technically even if they did have an issue with that, if an attorney provided that initial information (which I would assume they did though TFA didn't mention it specifically) it would be perfectly fine I believe. As always, I am not an attorney, merely a surfer of the interwebs that half-assedly can parse legal jargon. I may be wrong, but I would think this is all fine as long as he doesn't try to add anything that would be disallowed from pro se representation such as class action lawsuits or arguing before the Supreme Court (not thinking that one is likely feasible anyway...).

  34. Re:Filing is no big deal, collecting is the proble by qwerty+shrdlu · · Score: 1

    I feel dirty just for saying this, but couldn't you sell the debt to some scumbag collection agency? That way you at least get the price of a burger and fries and he gets years of amusing phone calls.

  35. Sue Joshua Browder for Anxiety by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am suing this kid because he is giving me anxiety now that anyone can sue me using this app.

  36. Re:Filing is no big deal, collecting is the proble by TheCastro1689 · · Score: 1

    If you can show you have made attempts to serve the person and their location is unknown you could do it through a Posting or Publication depending on your State's laws.