Slashdot Mirror


The Cryptocurrency Industry is 'On the Brink of an Implosion', Research Says (bloomberg.com)

Echoing sentiments of mainstream economists, Juniper Research is warning that many of the metrics in the cryptocurrency world are pointing to a market implosion. From a report: Industry bellwether Bitcoin had seen its daily transaction volumes fall from an average of around 360,000 a day in late 2017 to just 230,000 in September 2018. Meanwhile, daily transaction values were down from more than $3.7 billion to less than $670 million in the same period, Juniper said in the study, The Future of Cryptocurrency: Bitcoin & Altcoin Trends & Challenges 2018-2023. The market as a whole has contracted quickly as well. In the first quarter, cryptocurrency transactions totaled just over $1.4 trillion, compared with less than $1.7 trillion for 2017 as a whole, Juniper said. However, by the second quarter, transaction values had plummeted by 75 percent, with total market capitalization falling to just under $355 billion. "Based on activity during the first half of Q3, Juniper estimates a further 47 percent quarter-on-quarter drop in transaction values in that quarter," the researcher said in an accompanying white paper.

20 of 187 comments (clear)

  1. It's about time ... by sa666_666 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Let me start playing the worlds smallest violin.

    1. Re:It's about time ... by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 3, Funny

      Not only the smallest one, but continuously shrinking to boot?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    2. Re: It's about time ... by Calydor · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Real currencies have the backing of material goods and the agreement of the entire world that these are real currencies with THIS value.

      Cryptocurrencies were never much more than Monopoly money in a really big game of Monopoly.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    3. Re:It's about time ... by hey! · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Unfortunately, it's not just people who should know better who get sucked into something like this. You also get people who are just trying to do what they ought to, which is to put some of their surplus income into savings.

      Saving isn't rocket science, but most people don't learn how to do it in schools. Nor do schools equipment them with a functioning understanding of economics, or technology. So in the absence of any educational foundation that would enable them to evaluate speculation in cryptocurrency critically, they turn to the information sources at hand, and that's actually worse than just being completely ignorant.

      The Internet has infected civilization with what may be a fatal bug: engagement metrics equal profit. The system that delivers the bulk of everyone's awareness of the world is not focused on delivering information that they need, but on provoking measurable reactions. Pushing people's emotional buttons, in other words.

      Apply this principle to creating content on something like cryptocurrencies, and you'll quickly see that informing people of the downsides of speculation isn't going to generate profit. Since most people aren't speculating in cryptocurrencies yet, you can't engage them with information about the risks. You can, however, engage those people with this message: you are missing out. Media coverage of cryptocurrencies did a poor or non-existent job of explaining the risks of speculation, and played up stories of people just like you getting rich overnight.

      To an informed point of view the idea of putting money you will actually need into cryptocurrency was extremely stupid; but to a mind pickled in clickbait that actually looks economically rational, because of opportunity costs. If, hypothetically speaking, you could be getting rich quick in an investment which was perfectly safe, then dollar cost averaging into a mutual fund with low risk and moderate return would be the stupid thing to do.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    4. Re:It's about time ... by ColaMan · · Score: 2

      Assume the current algorithm was broken and all funds were stolen. The chain itself is the public ledger, rewind to the point of failure, implement to the new stronger (resistant) algorithm, and press the play button.

      You have no idea of how economics work, do you? There is no easy-peasy unwinding of transactions in the real world. It won't be a case of , "And here, right here is where everyone lost their money, we'll wind it back to then." There will be legitimate transactions amongst the fraudulent ones, and people will have already exchanged cryptocoins for goods and services that have now suddenly been unwound, or transferred value out of the currency elsewhere, or made subsequent transactions, etc.

      You can't pause and sort out the fraudulent transactions "somehow" and unwind/play forward again, because the interruption of service and loss of confidence will crash the value as soon as you resume transactions.

      It will be a complete and utter shitshow.

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
  2. Bubbles and Fads. by Zorro · · Score: 4, Funny

    Good thing Tulips and Beanie Babys are safe investments....

    1. Re: Bubbles and Fads. by reanjr · · Score: 2

      Yeah, because 17th century futures contracts that bubbled for a season before complete collapse is exactly like a 21st century distributed payment network which has been growing for a decade.

  3. A fool and his money... by nwaack · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I know it's an overused saying but it applies perfectly here.

    1. Re:A fool and his money... by pr0t0 · · Score: 2

      Ha, that's what you think! The $20 in Doge I bought is finally going to be at the same level as the big boys! Champagne wishes and caviar dreams, suckers!

      --
      I'm sorry, but your opinion seems to be wrong.
  4. Miners need to be seized by xack · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Seriously, governments should make it illegal to blatantly waste electricity. People cry about net neutrality, but electricity neutrality should be discussed too. In any other industry, wasting resources for no reason but to print electronic tokens would be cracked down on. It's is coming up to the 10th anniversary of the bailouts of the financial crisis that was caused by funny money mortgages, we need to arrest the designers of asics for environmental terrorism. I hope 100 years from now when our great grandchildren have to suffer in a climate changed world to ask that why didn't our generation stop the bitminers.

    1. Re: Miners need to be seized by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Satoshi was really a consortium of power companies.

    2. Re:Miners need to be seized by religionofpeas · · Score: 2

      Why don't we crack down on people watching sports on TV ?

  5. It really is too bad by ERJ · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Let me start with, crypto as an investment is stupid. But, it really is too bad if it fails. It would be nice to have a replacement for cash that has a similar anonymity to cash.

    Look, I'm not looking to do anything illegal or illicit but the situation of today where Visa could conceivably sell my purchase history to Google who would then target advertising to me or be able to provide the number of Snickers bars I ate this past year to health care or insurance providers doesn't sit particularly well with me either. So being able to purchase some groceries, clothes, etc through electronic means but in an anonymous fashion has a certain draw for me.

  6. "Brink" by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

    Meanwhile, daily transaction values were down from more than $3.7 billion to less than $670 million in the same period, Juniper said in the study, The Future of Cryptocurrency: Bitcoin & Altcoin Trends & Challenges 2018-2023. The market as a whole has contracted quickly as well. In the first quarter, cryptocurrency transactions totaled just over $1.4 trillion, compared with less than $1.7 trillion for 2017 as a whole, Juniper said. However, by the second quarter, transaction values had plummeted by 75 percent, with total market capitalization falling to just under $355 billion.

    That sounds like it passed the "brink of an implosion" about 65 percent ago.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  7. About time. by r1348 · · Score: 2

    Maybe all those obnoxious "Youtube economists" will crawl back to their mom's basements...

  8. Re:Check your local dumpsters... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

    There might be bags of good used video cards tossed after this all goes bust.

    You laugh, but I bought a pair of nice GeForce 1080 Ti's from a day trader who thought he was going to mine bitcoin and then decided that there was no such thing as free money. I see him sitting at the Starbucks with his Macbook, wheeling and dealing. Meanwhile, I've got a nice gaming card in my rig and a second one sitting here in case the other one blows up.

    I wonder how his move back to the stock market is going.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  9. Short Sighted by Doc+Right · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So some folks with more dollars than sense dumped a bunch of money into the cryptocurrency market trying to make a quick buck. Some won, some lost. It's been long accepted that most of the alt-coins available today will eventually disappear, leaving only the strongest and most useful cryptocurrencies. Speculation is what drove the market up to unsustainable levels. I believe it has come back down where it belongs, if not a bit lower, against the U.S. Dollar. But remember, we're talking about currencies, not stocks. People need to get out of the investment mentality and see the technology for what it is: Digital CASH. Blockchain will never die. Cryptocurrency as a whole will never fail. The genie is already out of the bottle. It just might take a little time for people to change their mentality about it.

  10. Nothing to see here. by cshark · · Score: 2

    They talk about the market imploding and correcting itself as though that's a bad thing. This happens with Bitcoin every couple of years. The system and the market always comes out stronger at the end of the cycle. This isn't news.

    --

    This signature has Super Cow Powers

  11. Re:Cryptocurrencies are not going anywhere by geoskd · · Score: 5, Informative

    Ok, I'll have a go:

    1: There is nothing intrinsic to crypto that makes it go up. If demand (i.e. utilization) is not growing as fast as new coins are mined, then the value drops. This is even more pronounced when the utilization growth goes negative. See yesterday, and last month, and this whole year. BTC is currently worth less than half what it was last year, and has the potential to drop all the way to zero without major changes to the world we live in. USD by contrast would only be capable of dropping to zero by way of the apocalypse.

    2: They are only as secure as the software that is used to handle it. Software in general is notoriously insecure. Also see 51% attack.

    3: You can achieve this same effect using a brokerage service, of which there are millions in every flavour you could want. The easiest to use variants are Credit Cards which are accepted almost universally. Visa handles 150M transactions per day, or approximately 3 orders of magnitude more than bitcoin, and in spite of that high load, they handle individual transactions in seconds. Nothing about cryptocurrency is inherently faster, better or safer.

    4: Oh Really?

    5: Only if they are universally accepted. If people stop accepting them, then they loose utility, and less people will be inclined to use them, which makes them even less useful. This is known as a death spiral, and the research cited in this story seems to indicate that bitcoin is headed in exactly that direction. This phenomenon is not unique to cryptocurrency, and is one of the reasons that AmEx plays dirty pool to force retailers to keep accepting their cards.

    --
    I wish I had a good sig, but all the good ones are copyrighted
  12. Again? by SinisterEVIL · · Score: 2

    Wow, since 2012 I've heard this roughly 1337 times. It must be true this time......