Slashdot Mirror
US Voter Records From 19 States Is Being Sold on a Hacking Forum, Threat Intelligence Firms Say (zdnet.com)
Catalin Cimpanu, reporting for ZDNet: The voter information for approximately 35 million US citizens is being peddled on a popular hacking forum, two threat intelligence firms have discovered. "To our knowledge this represents the first reference on the criminal underground of actors selling or distributing lists of 2018 voter registration data," said researchers from Anomali Labs and Intel471, the two companies who spotted the forum ad.
The two companies said they've reviewed a sample of the database records and determined the data to be valid with a "high degree of confidence." Researchers say the data contains details such as full name, phone numbers, physical addresses, voting history, and other voting-related information. It is worth noting that some states consider this data public and offer it for download for free, but not all states have this policy.
The two companies said they've reviewed a sample of the database records and determined the data to be valid with a "high degree of confidence." Researchers say the data contains details such as full name, phone numbers, physical addresses, voting history, and other voting-related information. It is worth noting that some states consider this data public and offer it for download for free, but not all states have this policy.
It is worth noting that some states consider this data public and offer it for download for free
So why not make it clear in your headline what % of the data is not public before getting all excited...
5 out of 6 people enjoy Russian Roulette & 6 out of 7 Dwarfs are not Happy
Records is getting sold, is they?
Keep in mind, that the "voting history" in the summary is easy to sensationalize. In most cases it only means you were issued a ballot, and possibly for mail-in ballots that you returned it. No state has a history of what actual voting selections were made.
"US Voter Records From 19 States Is Being Sold on a Hacking Forum...It is worth noting that some states consider this data public and offer it for download for free, but not all states have this policy."
Why am I willing to bet that 19 states do have this policy, turning this "hacking" story into nothing more than clickbait?
We used to get pissed when "hacking" was mislabeled or misunderstood. Now we're just pissed that no one has a fucking clue what a hack is anymore because everyone is labeling every stupid little thing as hacking. Found a shortcut to work? You "hacked" your commute. Used a microwave instead of the stove? You "hacked" your dinner prep. Downloaded free public information? You "hacked" the voting public.
Enough of the "hacking" shit already.
No need to worry. I have marked them all deceased and returned them to their source.
All run by the same individual, and s/he has a system in place with which someone can get their name(s) removed from the lists.
also offers the raw data files so individuals can build their own systems.
https://arkvoters.com/
https://coloradovoters.info/
https://connvoters.com/
https://delawarevoters.info/
https://flvoters.com/
https://michiganvoters.info/
https://ohiovoters.info/
https://oklavoters.com/
https://rivoters.com/
Amazing how nearly all are red states.
I wonder why that is?
In addition, the DBs are from this year due to updating. That means they have plenty of backdoors in the systems.
I hope that you red states can afford to have your ID and credit stolen.
Perhaps, you will finally back E-verify for real on all businesses.
I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
These are voter records, not voting history.
This is often your name and your address, which polling place you are registered at. Perhaps additional info, such as your age, and perhaps your signature, or picture.
However with this info + with general election results from a polling station. You can probably get a good picture on who to target and with what.
If you live in an area that voted 90% republican in your polling location, and it knows that you voted at that location. Then chances are you had voted republican, and are more acceptable to republican propaganda, vs democrat propaganda. So you will be targeted with words such as patriotism, and freedom. vs targeted words such as responsibility and liberty. They may be pushing the same agenda but will word it in ways that will make you feel more comfortable about it, vs hearing the other way which fills your heart with dread.
If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
Oh boy, really?
Where I have no idea what the facts actually are here, I'm going to make two guesses (let me know if I'm wrong.)
1. Brian Kemp is ahead in the race.
2. There is a legal reason each these registrations have been held up/rejected which is clearly defined in the laws of Georgia.
As to the allegations of being a child abuser, these need to be investigated by the police. If there is sufficient evidence to charge he needs to be charged, otherwise, this is nothing more than political mud slinging by the opposition who is likely behind and has no choice but to go low..
Now, I've made my predictions based on years of observing political campaigns. Am I right or not?
"File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
In states with party registration your registration is also in the public voter file. If they've got voter history they also generally get which years you voted in the primaries, which will give anyone who knows the state's politics a very good way to figure out which way you lean.
records are. record is.
if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
Kemp is not especially ahead in the race. Both candidates are around 46 percent in the latest polls.
The bit about holding a gun on a kid is a claim related to a TV ad Kemp himself aired. He had a shotgun on his lap and a kid, apparently the boyfriend of one of Kemp's daughters, in an adjacent chair. All of this was in Kemp's own ad and isn't disputable.
The claim is that he pointed the gun at this boy and that equals child abuse. He did not point the gun AT the boy in the ad that aired. It was pointed past the boy, not AT him. Not really even close. Thus the whole claim of child abuse is easy to disprove. However, as a gun safety nut, it irks me to see Kemp treating his gun as a joke, and he almost certainly DID aim it at people on the film crew in the process of making the ad. I find that offensive, stupid and a demonstration of awful behavior and poor judgement. But it wasn't child abuse.
All of that said, there are plenty of other things about Kemp that deserve to be investigated. He's running another ad where he claims to have pulled strings or something similar to get an organ transplant for a sick child. He's right there admitting he played favorites and pressured insurance companies to do what he wanted. It's right there IN his ad. He brags about it. This should be a scandal. Nobody cares.
Sig for hire.
So I went and looked.. RCP has this race at about 3% edge for Kemp, so I was right on #1. You don't address #2 and you totally missed my point about the child abuse claim. In the child abuse thing, I'm saying INVESTIGATE and charge him if necessary, but until that's done, shut up about it because it really smacks of political mud slinging which isn't very effective in the long term and turns off about as many voters on both sides at best and carries huge risks for the mud thrower should the claims look petty (and in this case, they do). My prediction is Kemp wins with somewhere north of 5% margin maybe as high as 10%, so get used to it.
"File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101