Slashdot Mirror


California Company Markets A $2,400 2W Laser Bong That You Need to Wear Protective Glasses To Use (vice.com)

Silicon Cali is now selling a massive device that uses a two-watt, 445 nanometer laser to light the bowl of a bong, according to an article shared by dmoberhaus: This is about 400 times more powerful than the average laser pointer, which has an output of about five milliwatts. Silicon Cali even sells special glasses that are meant to protect your eyes while looking directly at the laser when you take a hit. "The laser is not that dangerous, it's not going to cut your finger off or anything crazy like that," Justin Zelaya, the founder of Silicon Cali, told me in an email. "It may sting a little bit if you get your hand in the way but kind of like a magnifying glass."

Zelaya told me that he worked with five other people to produce the bong and that their backgrounds range from "Bitcoin core developer to a mad scientist, like myself...." The glass, which is custom blown in California, is lined with color-changing LEDs. The entire thing is controlled by a phone app.

Each laser bong is being sold for $2,400 -- which as far as I can see is worth every damn penny.

The company only plans to sell 45 of these "limited edition" devices...

110 comments

  1. Pot, high powered laser.... by addikt10 · · Score: 5, Funny

    What could possibly go wrong?
    All it really needs is a sticker saying "Do not look at laser with remaining eye"

    1. Re:Pot, high powered laser.... by arth1 · · Score: 3

      Indeed. I think "stoned people" belong on the list of people who should not be trusted to handle 2000 mW lasers.

    2. Re:Pot, high powered laser.... by ma1wrbu5tr · · Score: 1

      Much less 2 μW!

      --
      Why can't we go back to using jumpers to configure slot adapter cards? Why? I say!
    3. Re:Pot, high powered laser.... by msauve · · Score: 2

      Yep. It's strange that legal pot comes in containers with doper-proof caps.

      "Each laser bong is being sold for $2,400 -- which as far as I can see is worth every damn penny."

      A Bic lighter costs a buck. There are lots of other ways to generate heat which don't cost $2400. A fool (Daniel Oberhaus, the author of that quote) and his money are soon parted. That's probably a good thing - stupidity should be painful.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    4. Re:Pot, high powered laser.... by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

      It does? I haven't gotten it in a proper prescription bottle, ever so far. Sometimes I'll put it in one because they seal so nicely, but weed comes in much flimsier containers with simple flip lids. They're not bad for keeping an air seal, but they're not as good as the "push down and turn" caps. I'm sure they're also much cheaper to make (being one piece), and use somewhat less plastic.

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    5. Re:Pot, high powered laser.... by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

      I'm willing to bet a disproportionate number of buyers will be enginerd types, and that very little will go wrong with them that isn't the result of deliberate experimentation.

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    6. Re:Pot, high powered laser.... by Mal-2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It seems to me that the whole laser-to-bowl volume should be wrapped in the goggle material and/or something completely opaque, and that the laser should refuse to operate if it's not. That's just a basic industrial safety interlock, and this is pretty much an industrial bong. It's not hard to design a box that will happily leak air but not light. That pretty much describes every camera.

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    7. Re:Pot, high powered laser.... by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 2

      What could possibly go wrong?
      All it really needs is a sticker saying "Do not look at laser with remaining eye"

      "Dave's eye's not here, man!"

    8. Re:Pot, high powered laser.... by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 1

      Sigh.
      How far Slashdot has fallen. Pitiful.

      OK, I'll say it:

      My Eyes! The goggles do nothing!

    9. Re:Pot, high powered laser.... by jwhyche · · Score: 3

      Anything less than 2 MW is not worth the trouble.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    10. Re:Pot, high powered laser.... by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      It will be legalized - if only because the politicians know these fucking retards will receive handouts (at the tax payer's expense of course) for blinding themselves. And why not, they're already deaf and dumb; might as well complete the list.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
  2. testing by KiloByte · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sounds like they tested their product -- a lot, and that their business plan involves giving prospective buyers a test drive.

    --
    The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    1. Re:testing by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Sounds like they tested their product -- a lot, and that their business plan involves giving prospective buyers a test drive.

      Sounds like April Fools day was in November this year.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  3. I want a portable one. by Kernel+Kurtz · · Score: 1

    Hopefully the technology evolves.

    1. Re: I want a portable one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Expect another Slashdot advertisement, I mean "article", when that comes out.

  4. Been there done that by goosesensor · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A friend and myself have been making anywhere from 200mA - 1.6A lasers, and indeed smoking weed with them for years.

    1. Re: Been there done that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My guess is that even without the weed, you'd still be playing with lasers. So once you have the recreational laser anyway, it's cool to do things like light pot with it. But a laser *dedicated* to lighting pot? Stupid.

  5. 420 actually.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The website states they'll produce a total of 420 such bongs

  6. Ignorant non-pot smoker by Urinal+Pube · · Score: 1

    If you're like me, and assumed this meant "illuminate" the bowl, you'll be pleasantly surprised by the video.

  7. California shaming? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Why do you have to point out it's a Californian company in the headline? States are usually not mentioned there for product announcements.

    1. Re:California shaming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of the rest of the states consider Florida to have an unusual amount of stupid.

      FTFY

      Oh wait, pretty much every state has its share of stupid.

    2. Re:California shaming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whatever state you are from OBVIOUSLY has its share of stupid.

    3. Re:California shaming? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I agree.

      Like it was necessary to mention that something like that comes out of Cali.

      That's like saying some ridiculous ruling about patent law came out of Texas. It simply goes without saying.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:California shaming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bet its California..

    5. Re: California shaming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they hadn't said the State, I'd have given 50/50 between California and Oregon.

    6. Re:California shaming? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      My state can beat up your state!

  8. If you can get this excited about a bong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It pretty much speaks for itself. And people wonder why tech is so mediocre these days.

    1. Re:If you can get this excited about a bong by Kernel+Kurtz · · Score: 1

      It pretty much speaks for itself. And people wonder why tech is so mediocre these days.

      I gotta say it is way more useful than a flamethrower.

    2. Re: If you can get this excited about a bong by aliquis · · Score: 1

      An Apple II or a laser bong.
      The progress we've made.

    3. Re: If you can get this excited about a bong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look honey! I bought a laser powered bong! Oh, wait, don't look!

    4. Re:If you can get this excited about a bong by TangoCharlie · · Score: 1

      What is a bong?

      --
      return 0; }
  9. Eyes protection but not fingers protection. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It will cut the 5 fingers of your hand, be careful!

    1. Re:Eyes protection but not fingers protection. by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

      It will cut the 5 fingers of your hand, be careful!

      TFS says it won't do more than sting your fingers (like a magnifying glass.)

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    2. Re:Eyes protection but not fingers protection. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      It will cut the 5 fingers of your hand, be careful!

      TFS says it won't do more than sting your fingers (like a magnifying glass.)

      Wonder what it does to your pets. Although them having little protective eyeglasses would be cute.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    3. Re:Eyes protection but not fingers protection. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My dog doesn't like the bong. Her nose gets stuck in it, and the cat just looks at me like I'm crazy when i try to pass it to her..

  10. worth every penny ? seriously by etash · · Score: 3, Informative

    that's way overpriced, wicked lasers have been selling lasers of this power at a fraction of the price for years

    1. Re:worth every penny ? seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't something produced on an assembly line. Someone is sitting there in their garage soldering shit together for you. You're paying them for their time.

    2. Re: worth every penny ? seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lots of stoners have too much money. /reading this at the ganja store in Colorado.

    3. Re:worth every penny ? seriously by etash · · Score: 1

      and why would anyone want to do that ? it's stupid.

    4. Re:worth every penny ? seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because if you're not paying a local american for their time, then you are paying a multi-national corporation using child labor in China to produce it for you.

    5. Re:worth every penny ? seriously by JThundley · · Score: 1

      What's crazy to me is that they use this expensive technology to just crudely burn weed. For less than $500 you can get a good vaporizer that's still expensive, but is less wasteful and healthier. It also allows everyone to share fresh greens... or so I've heard. Less mess and cleanup too.

  11. A phone app? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a bong, strapping a laser and some unicorn vomit on it doesn't mean it needs an app. Dr. Evil didn't need an appin' app for his frickin' sharks, we don't need an appin' app for our frickin' bongs.

    1. Re:A phone app? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Be thankful it doesn't have a blockchain as well.

    2. Re:A phone app? by tonique · · Score: 1

      Every hit goes into the global blockhain!

  12. Still becomes a smelly dirty bong after first hit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Portable vaping for flower is better

  13. This is pretty dumb by jpatters · · Score: 1

    Any mishap with those glasses, such as getting a bit silly and having them shift slightly on your face so that a specular reflection of laser light off of some dust particle in the air reaches your eye, and you are instantly blinded for life. Not a good idea while high.

    --
    "Remember, there never were pineapple-almond cookies here."
    1. Re:This is pretty dumb by SumDog · · Score: 1

      You should never need the glasses. The laser shoots down into the bowl. You'd have to get your head under the mouth piece and look up into the lighter. It's gimmick anyway. It's not going to make it any better to smoke than a traditional lighter or better yet, a mini vape.

    2. Re:This is pretty dumb by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      It's gimmick anyway. It's not going to make it any better to smoke than a traditional lighter or better yet, a mini vape.

      Unless quantum-entangled weed gets you twice a high.

      (For reference, it seems someone is claiming to have created/observed quantum entanglement in bacteria. )

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    3. Re:This is pretty dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      You should never need the glasses. The laser shoots down into the bowl. You'd have to get your head under the mouth piece and look up into the lighter. It's gimmick anyway. It's not going to make it any better to smoke than a traditional lighter or better yet, a mini vape.

      At 2W, you do need the glasses. This is a Class 4 device. Even diffuse or indirect beam viewing can burn your eyes out before your blink reflex kicks in.

      The glass of the bong could reflect things in ways that you don't predict. The smoke particles - a piece of leaf or ash at the wrong place at the wrong angle - would be enough to create a serious hazard.

      Worse yet, it's green. Basically the optimal (pessimal) wavelength to maximize absorption by your (disporportionately red-reflecting green-absorbing) retina.

    4. Re:This is pretty dumb by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

      Unless quantum-entangled weed gets you twice a high.

      More like it will get you high and not high.

      You won't know which until your cat tells you.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    5. Re:This is pretty dumb by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      At 2W, you do need the glasses. This is a Class 4 device. Even diffuse or indirect beam viewing can burn your eyes out before your blink reflex kicks in.

      I was nailed in the eye by a laser once, a few watts. It was being bounced around as someone adjusted one of the mirrors. Doctor said it was pretty miraculous that it only hit the white of one of my eyes, and I was lucky I wasn't blinded.

      Worse yet, it's green. Basically the optimal (pessimal) wavelength to maximize absorption by your (disporportionately red-reflecting green-absorbing) retina.

      When I read that sentence, it was very clear that you do know exactly what you are talking about.

      Mods, get this post to +5 informative ASAP.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    6. Re:This is pretty dumb by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      You should never need the glasses. The laser shoots down into the bowl. You'd have to get your head under the mouth piece and look up into the lighter. It's gimmick anyway. It's not going to make it any better to smoke than a traditional lighter or better yet, a mini vape.

      Looking at TFA, there are plenty of reflective surfaces to send the light into places it can do damage. So perhaps you can try getting baked with this device sans eyewear, then report back to us on how safe it is.

      Using one of those Braille keyboards.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    7. Re:This is pretty dumb by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

      You mean you won't know which unless your cat tells you. Because if the cat tells you anything at all, you're probably high.

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    8. Re:This is pretty dumb by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Indeed. In sane countries you cannot even get more than 5mW without being a certified laser-safety expert. That laser is like a chainsaw without any safety.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    9. Re:This is pretty dumb by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Reflection. Some idiot holding a piece of metal in the laser-path. It will happen. The glasses are fore show, though, they are just to avoid the lawsuits from the idiot blinding himself.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    10. Re:This is pretty dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Worse yet, it's green"

      445nm is blue. At least learn your light before talking about it, jesus.

    11. Re:This is pretty dumb by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Worse yet, it's green.

      Actually it's blue, but the rest of your post is on point.

      But since we're here we can talk about the colour clashing of a bong lighting up green while firing a blue laser. There's an old saying for those who aren't in high-fashion and thus unable to pull off this stunt: "Blue and Green should never be seen, especially not without a colour in between".

    12. Re: This is pretty dumb by Provocateur · · Score: 1

      So the new updated meme should be: just smoke it--no need to look at it with remaining eye

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    13. Re:This is pretty dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Worse yet, it's green.

      Actually it's blue, but the rest of your post is on point.

      But since we're here we can talk about the colour clashing of a bong lighting up green while firing a blue laser. There's an old saying for those who aren't in high-fashion and thus unable to pull off this stunt: "Blue and Green should never be seen, especially not without a colour in between".

      That you would know that suggests strongly that you are gay.

    14. Re: This is pretty dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      who the fuck cares if a drug user got hurt, or better still, died. they're drug users. LOSERS.

  14. ya too much powah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Right. They need to turn the power down to something like 0.002 kW.

  15. Slashvertisement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Time honored tradition.

  16. On the bright side... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...at least we know the answer to the "what were they smoking when they came up with that?" question.

  17. Life almost stranger than fiction by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

    Great. Now we just need some perspective-enhancing alien pheromones to smoke through this Laser Hookah in a Star Wars themed cantina and perhaps there can finally be a permanent Israeli / Palestinian ceasefire.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  18. Just wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just wait until that phone app is no longer available. $2400 paperweight.

  19. If it ain't broke.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Do. Not. Fix. It.

    Bongs don't need lasers.

    1. Re: If it ain't broke.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then your bong soon will. All it takes is one stoned moment and your idiot friend drops it.

    2. Re: If it ain't broke.. by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

      That's why I have a bong made from a plastic "yard glass" used at frat parties. If anyone drops my bong and it actually breaks (more likely, the weed that jumps out of the bowl will be worth more than any damage), they can just get me another $3 yard glass to punch two holes in. The metal stem isn't going to break.

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
  20. For the 80â(TM)s fan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Perfect for that 80â(TM)s fan watching Kung Fury on VHS and smoking his Laser Bong.

  21. Reason #237623795 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    people think potheads are a bunch of stupid useless unreliable fuckers.

    thanks for that. makes it so much more difficult for the rest of us whos lives don't revolve around drugs.

    1. Re:Reason #237623795 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You got some drugs man?

  22. Seriously? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

    "The laser is not that dangerous, it's not going to cut your finger off or anything crazy like that"

    It takes something like 15 J per square centimeter or so to cause third-degree burns. How thin is the 2 W beam?

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  23. Gotta be high to pay that much. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    dope

  24. No, That's Stupid by Greyfox · · Score: 1

    Go out and buy a Pax vaporizer for way less money, way less risk of permanent eye damage and a much better general smoking experience. Funnily enough, a Pax loaded with loose pipe tobacco is a better overall experience than smoking tobacco in a pipe. And of course that's the ONLY WAY I USE IT! Yeah.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  25. Stoners did something stupid? by raymorris · · Score: 1

    You're telling me stoned people did something stupid? Now way!

    (Former stoner here. My income has increased 500% since I stopped getting stoned.)

    1. Re:Stoners did something stupid? by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

      Funny, it's the reverse for me. The smoking went way down after my income fell off. The smoking was half the reason I was able to stay sane long enough to keep that job as long as I did.

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
  26. Guardians of the Galaxy by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    Sounds like something Rocket from Guardians of the Galaxy would come up with -- and he wouldn't bother putting any laser warning labels on it, and laugh uproariously at the fool stoners who did end up frying an eyeball with it.

    Come now, stoners; a 2W laser at any wavelength is not Amateur Night shit for casuals -- let alone stoned casuals -- to be fooling with. There will be a lawsuit.

  27. Ob by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Funny

    which as far as I can see with my remaining eye is worth every damn penny.

    FTFY

    Anyone else surprised it isn't Musk selling these?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:Ob by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're such a fucking fangirl.

    2. Re:Ob by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It does indeed tick all the boxes:
      - technological solution
      - overpriced
      - recreational drugs

      So yeah :)

  28. Nothing on my Plasma Bong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I only entrust the smooth smoking of the best purple indicas to my phase plasma bong in the 40W range

  29. Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Spend 2 400 on a gimmicky bong that could take an eye out, or spend it on more weed?

    I don't think they researched their customer base that well.

  30. FOOLS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    b fool and their money are soon parted.

  31. Pretty stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is what people in America spend their time on?

    Meanwhile China pushes ahead...

  32. Re:Still becomes a smelly dirty bong after first h by Mal-2 · · Score: 2

    Bong cleaning is easy.

    First, put in some table salt. A couple tablespoons will do.

    Then put in about half as much 90% isopropanol in as you would water.

    Cover all the holes, and shake the hell out of it. The salt will act as an abrasive to remove the tar, because it won't dissolve in alcohol. The 10% water in the solvent will make the salt a little slushy, but this is good.

    Then rinse it out and let it dry, or put it back in service once you can no longer smell alcohol.

    Stem cleaning should also be done with alcohol, though pipe cleaners and cotton swabs work better than salt for things you can actually reach.

    --
    How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
  33. dont play with it ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    dont play with it you'll go blind!

  34. well sure by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

    If you can't trust hardware engineering from "Bitcoin core developers" and mad scientists, what can you trust?

  35. Up Sell! by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

    it's not going to cut your finger off or anything crazy like that...

    You need the $5000 deluxe model for that.

  36. The trial lawyers' trifecta by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    Bongs, power lasers, California!

  37. Why not make a laser vape instead? by bistromath007 · · Score: 1

    By having a laser calibrated vaporize a specific amount of distillate, you could better control how much you're about to inhale than trying to suck on a pen with a heating coil. Then I won't get entirely too high because the physical process of smoking is new enough to me that I can do it wrong, like what happened on Monday.

  38. RAY MORRIS - pusher of nazi propaganda, zero life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12520486&cid=57184660 - RAY MORRIS NO LONGER GETS STONED, HE NOW PUSHES NAZI PROPAGANDA.

    PUNK ASS RAY MORRIS LOL SOMEONE SHOOT THIS NAZI TRASH

    Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING. Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.

  39. A fool and his money by Elfich47 · · Score: 1

    A fool and his money are soon parted.

    --
    Architectural plans are like computer source code with a couple of differences: You only compile once.
  40. any benefits? by n3r0.m4dski11z · · Score: 1

    Ok, so it does "something" with lasers. Does it work like some vapourizers that use infrared as well as other non combusting techniques? or is it a $2400 lighter.

    This is a poorly written writeup and i would definitely wait for a proper review before passing judgment. A pure "smoking" experience is the holy grail of the vapourizer market, so if you can do it more pure like with lasers, that that would be interesting to know!

    With legality comes a brave new world of science!

    --
    -
    1. Re:any benefits? by gweihir · · Score: 1

      It is a $2400 lighter, that is pretty dangerous compared to a normal lighter in addition. A product for idiots with money.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  41. Next Up... CERN by wolfheart111 · · Score: 1

    Quantum Cannabinoids :)

    --
    [($)]
  42. Rick and Morty by Powercntrl · · Score: 1

    Laser Hookah

    It all makes sense now. Figures it would be Rick and Morty fans that created a real-life version of a method to smoke pot that is impractical, unsafe, and extremely overpriced. Real stoners would never bother with something this daft.

    --

    ---
    DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
  43. Re:I work at the LHC by wolfheart111 · · Score: 1

    I sneak in a nug occasionally and zap it with the collider... awesome. :)

    --
    [($)]
  44. That line from Reservoir Dogs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "You're not blind;that's just the blood getting into your eyes"

  45. What about science? by Rambo+Tribble · · Score: 1

    The psychoactive components of marijuana boil off prior to actual combustion of the plant's woody material, so a gradual heating releases more of the desired products. A quick rise to high temperature simply burns the psychoactives along with the wood.

    1. Re:What about science? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The psychoactive components of marijuana boil off prior to actual combustion of the plant's woody material, so a gradual heating releases more of the desired products. A quick rise to high temperature simply burns the psychoactives along with the wood.

      You said woody. That gives me a BONER.

      It takes about a tespoon of blood to make a penis fully hard no matter how big it is (and mine is huge!). There's your science! For biology!!

  46. Ignorant as hell in general by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're like me, and assumed this meant "illuminate" the bowl, you'll be pleasantly surprised by the video.

    Uhm no, 2W lasers don't merely "illuminate". This is well known or easily referenced so no surprise at all.

  47. Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is your brain on drugs.

  48. We need to highlight third-party damage though! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because it will not only blind you. But everyone in the room, everyone around the corner with a mirror, and everyone outside the window for quite a bit.
    Oh, and if you point it at a plane, you might just have committed mass-murder, and illegal usage of quite massive "fireworks".

  49. $2,400 toy of cannabis prohibition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone who can afford $2,400 for a bong is making money from cannabis prohibition directly or indirectly.

  50. Re:I work at the LHC by f3rret · · Score: 1

    has it given you superpowers or let you see into the space beyond space, yet?

    --
    Admit nothing. Deny Everything. Make Counter-accusations.
  51. Weird. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This bong device should have a translucent filtering tube over the emitter up to the small weed caddy or something like that.

    I guess someone was high when designed that.

  52. Re:Yes... by wolfheart111 · · Score: 1

    physics is a little different when your high. :)

    --
    [($)]