Slashdot Mirror


China Violated Obama-Era Cybertheft Pact, U.S. Official Says (marketwatch.com)

China has violated an accord it signed with the U.S. three years ago pledging not to engage in hacking for the purpose of economic espionage, a senior U.S. intelligence official said this week. From a report: The 2015 bilateral agreement had significantly reduced the amount of Chinese cybertheft targeting American companies, but Beijing's commitment to the deal has eroded, said Rob Joyce, senior adviser for cybersecurity strategy at the National Security Agency. "It is clear they are well beyond the bounds of the agreement today that was forged between our two countries," Joyce said during a panel conversation at the Aspen Cyber Summit.

Joyce's comments were the latest sign of Washington's rising frustration over China's alleged violation of the pact signed between then-President Barack Obama and Chinese President Xi Jinping. Last week, then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions also said China wasn't adhering to the deal, in which the U.S. and China agreed not to conduct cyber operations against each other to steal intellectual property or other forms of economic intelligence.

74 comments

  1. No details by XXongo · · Score: 1
    Hmm-- the article doesn't give any details about exactly how, when and where China "engaged in hacking for the purpose of economic espionage".

    The article says there's a longer article at Wall Street Journal, but it's paywalled: https://www.wsj.com/articles/c...

    1. Re:No details by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm-- the article doesn't give any details about exactly how, when and where China "engaged in hacking for the purpose of economic espionage".

      Check your local firewall and IDPS logs.

      Any way they can, every day, everywhere.

  2. And by DarkOx · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I mean lets be honest here; nobody is going to do jack about it. We don't ever do anything about China's bad behavior except 'talk' and maybe sell some weapons systems to Taiwan.

    China unlike Russia is real threat to us and all anyone in our government; with the occasional (and only occasional) exception being Trump cares to do anything about it.

    The talking heads will cry about how important free trade is while we literally let all our industrial and defense secrets walk out the door.

    Trump 2020!

    --
    Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    1. Re:And by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1, Funny

      but.. but the orange man is always, always universally bad isn't he?

    2. Re: And by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you, are always a partisan shithead.

    3. Re:And by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What type of threat? An existential threat? If not an existential threat what's up with the military.

    4. Re:And by BringsApples · · Score: 1

      Sports, religion, politics - all have die-hard fans, but DAMN those fans annoy the rest of us.

      --
      Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
    5. Re:And by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's be more honest, we are doing it too and they probably published the sister piece in their media.

    6. Re:And by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US are still a much bigger threat than either China or Russia.

    7. Re:And by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China unlike Russia is real threat

      They are both shitty and a threat. Just because Chinese government is arguably shittier than Russian government doesn't mean anything. They are both a danger to the future of civilization. So go home Petya. U are not drunk enough.

    8. Re:And by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "China unlike Russia is real threat to us and all anyone in our government" - Is real threat. Is real threat. Hmm

    9. Re:And by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And a less honourable trade partner as well. I'm not sure why Canada and Mexico are bothering to enter into a new NAFTA deal when the US hasn't honoured the existing NAFTA.

    10. Re:And by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To whom?

    11. Re:And by guruevi · · Score: 1

      It's not like the US wasn't violating the pact the day of signing. This was merely virtue signaling by an inept administration, nobody expects those to be upheld.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    12. Re:And by larryjoe · · Score: 0

      China unlike Russia is real threat to us and all anyone in our government; with the occasional (and only occasional) exception being Trump cares to do anything about it.

      The talking heads will cry about how important free trade is while we literally let all our industrial and defense secrets walk out the door.

      Trump has imposed tariffs to try to gain more favorable import/export balances that hopefully will lead to greater US employment and economic activity. Time will tell whether this strategy will work, and it's quite possible that we'll never really know because there are other factors that affect employment and economic activity. Just as free trade results in economic winners and losers among American citizens, tariffs likewise dictate winners and losers among American citizens. There exists the possibility that the negative effects of the tariffs will outweigh the positive on a national basis.

      With regards to Chinese theft of American IP via espionage and Chinese laws that force the "lawful" handover of IP, what has Trump done? Tariffs do nothing to combat this theft. This IP theft is where China is trying to gain a competitive advantage that will last far into the future.

    13. Re:And by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You pin your hopes on Trump, who already sold out to Russia, China, and North Korea?

      That's funny.

    14. Re:And by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      China is the threat, not Russia? Sounds like that was written from the internet research agency in St. Petersburg. Nice try, Ivan, it won't work. You think they're having kasha for lunch today? About lunchtime there, isn't it?

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    15. Re:And by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It won't work. Only 1% of companies have considered returning back to the US. "Consider" being the key word here. Everyone else is just moving there business to other countries mainly in Southeast Asia. It doesn't really matter to much to China, considering that they are also investing heavily in SE Asia, and looking to move businesses there as well.

    16. Re: And by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you clearly have no sense of humor, or ability to parse irony or sarcasm.

    17. Re:And by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Source?

    18. Re:And by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To other first world nations.

    19. Re:And by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a competition. There can be only one!

    20. Re:And by mrclevesque · · Score: 1

      Exactly. It looks like a probable motivation for this US official's 'intelligence leak' is the US is doing it more (and better) and it's only recently that China has started catching up.

    21. Re:And by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think is time for vodka break komrad

    22. Re:And by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      Well lets see

      Russia can't reasonably resist us militarily in virtually any theater.

      Russia's economy is nearly irrelevant to our own. It could collapse to today and Wall street would hardly bat an eye.

      Russia does not have the productive capacity to dump in other markets; other than perhaps in unskilled labor products and maybe for a short while oil/gas. In this sense they are as grave a threat to us as say most of the middle east.

      ----
      Meanwhile China, at least if they are willing to cut the nose off to spite the face - absolutely can make us miserable today.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
  3. They tried to steal the secret of how to milk cows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They keep pulling the wrong bit!

  4. Terrible Quandry by ilsaloving · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wow, this must be a down right terrible quandry from Trump.

    He has to choose between China, or an Obama-era agreement that works in his favour.

    1. Re:Terrible Quandry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still don't get it do you. He gets to trash both of them and choose nothing.

    2. Re:Terrible Quandry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given his behavior over the last two years I doubt there's a quandry. He'll just break the agreement on reflex.

  5. A troll wants one from its intellectual creation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Intellectual property" is feed for the creators but also for the holders or companies or businessmen.

  6. Not as bad as. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That didn't take long to bring Russia into this as well.

  7. I am not saying this is Karma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But if Trump throw out the nuclear agreement with Iran, why would anyone insist China has to stick with their agreement with the US?

    1. Re:I am not saying this is Karma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A nuclear agreement that wasn't worth the paper it was printed on? The fact is all agreements with China are worth shit as well. That's why environmental regulation that involves them is pointless. They'll gleefully violet them if it means attracting more economic power to themselves.

    2. Re:I am not saying this is Karma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But if Trump throw out the nuclear agreement with Iran, why would anyone insist China has to stick with their agreement with the US?

      Exactly this, Trump has very loudly withdrawn with a signed agreement because he disagrees with it.

      Why should anybody expect any other country to do any different?

    3. Re:I am not saying this is Karma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China is welcome to withdraw from the agreement. At least Trump was honest and forthright with his withdrawal.

    4. Re:I am not saying this is Karma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But if Trump throw out the nuclear agreement with Iran, why would anyone insist China has to stick with their agreement with the US?

      Well, perhaps because Iran was violating the agreement from the moment they signed it?

      https://www.huffingtonpost.com/majid-rafizadeh/iran-breached-the-nuclear_b_9977768.html

      Huffpost, so not really right-leaning. Date is May 2016, still during the Obama administration, and the deal was signed January 2016. Per the article, IRan was not to continue to develop it's ballistic missile capability, and yet tested missiles 3 times in the 5 months after signing it.

      So perhaps another question should be: given the toothless nature of foreign policy deals signed under the Obama administration, why would China continue to follow that agreement?

    5. Re:I am not saying this is Karma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, Trump and honest in the same sentence. ROTFLMAO.

    6. Re:I am not saying this is Karma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He never said that!

    7. Re:I am not saying this is Karma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit. Iran nuclear deal never included ballistic missles. Iran is sticking with ther end, and when they begin to develop nuke as a result of your country's retarded sanctions, guess who'll be objectively responsible for another nuclear country?

  8. Bilateral agreement are really great. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So long as there courts and other parties willing to back them up.

    Obama signed it knowing it's worthless. Trump still doesn't get it.

  9. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you honestly think that the business leaders in charge of the defense contractors are that stupid? Do you think the DOD would allow such things? (There are bigger patriots working for shit government pay there then some talking heads talking out of their asses.)

    You are so misinformed. Where do you get this shit?

    I bet you think the caravan is filled with MS13, drug dealers etc ... who decided that the best way to sneak into the USA was to join a bunch of people who are heavily scrutinized by media, police, government, and walk thousands of miles to sneak into the USA undetected.

    That's what Trump is saying and his idiot sycophants are repeating.

  10. "Engaged in hacking" - you mean like Russia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because in this case, some people China trolled some a bunch of users and groups on Facebook. Shocking!

    Indeed, that is an intolerable assault on the very core of our democracy and we must fulminate about this for two years at the minimum!

  11. It's fine, the U.S. breaks it every day themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so why should anyone else care?

  12. My 0.02 by DaMattster · · Score: 1

    Why try and develop the technology when you can steal it? I guess that is what the Chinese Government thinks.

  13. Fire drill by PopeRatzo · · Score: 0

    The Chinese (as well as several other countries) feel emboldened to do this because we currently have historically weak leadership who will do fuck-all about it as long as there may be a chance of someday building a casino in Shanghai or the ability to borrow money from a Chinese bank or sell his daughter's tchotchkes and handbags and shit.

    The Chinese will run circles around this dope.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Fire drill by gtall · · Score: 1

      Well...there's that and also this comes from the Justice Dept. who must have gotten it from the FBI. Now we know that the FBI is a hotbed of Democrats intent on screwing el Presidente Tweetie because...because...they like fake news, immigrants, and premarital intercourse. Hmmm...maybe that caravan in Mexico is actually a Chinese caravan. It makes sense, they are coming here to built a Great Wall to keep Americans in. And the aliens, I'm sure the little green fellers are mixed in with it somewhere...Chinese alien migrants from a different galaxy here to destroy America!!!

    2. Re:Fire drill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Let's blame it on Trump and forget all about Bill Clinton who started this catastrophic avalanche by granting Communist China Most Favored Nation status; George W. Bush who did nothing when it should have been obvious that China was not going to play by the rules with respect to fair trade, IP protection, and industrial espionage; and Barack Obama who also did nothing even though is was even more obvious that China is not a partner to be trusted. None of Clinton, W. Bush, or Obama even so much as peeped about the terribly unfair trade relationship between the U.S. and China.

      Whether Trump accomplishes anything useful or not, at least he has publicly and vociferously verbalized a problem that many Americans see.

    3. Re:Fire drill by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Let's blame it on Trump and forget all about Bill Clinton who started this catastrophic avalanche by granting Communist China Most Favored Nation status

      You can blame whomever you want. I'm just telling you why all these countries are taking advantage of the US right now..

      You remember those "tough sanctions" that Trump was going to put on Iran? He even released a meme, using the Game of Thrones font, with a picture of himself looking "tough" (apparently, "tough" is one of his favorite words), and the meme said, "Sanctions are Coming". Oh boy. Well, it turns out that those sanctions included a long list of waivers for Iran's biggest trading partners (China, India, South Korea, Japan, Italy, Greece, Taiwan and Turkey) so their basically not sanctions at all. That's why the oil market's been surprised by the fact that the price of oil has only gone down, which is exactly the opposite of what you'd expect to happen if Iran was being blocked from selling oil.

      I dare you to name one country that Trump has been "tough" with (besides the United States). He's basically been the whole world's punching bag since he's been elected.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    4. Re:Fire drill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      None of Clinton, W. Bush, or Obama even so much as peeped about the terribly unfair trade relationship between the U.S. and China.

      I bet if you asked every Walmart shopper whether they'd be willing to pay more for the stuff in their shopping cart if it meant that more Americans would get to keep their jobs, every last man, woman, and child would say no fucking way.

    5. Re:Fire drill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was pretty fucking toughed when he bombed Syria twice. That's something Obama could never muster the resolve to do.

    6. Re:Fire drill by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      He was pretty fucking toughed when he bombed Syria twice. That's something Obama could never muster the resolve to do.

      He bombed Syria after warning them to move their planes. The only damage was to an airfield that was fixed within days. Do you really not remember how it happened?

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    7. Re:Fire drill by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      The Chinese (as well as several other countries) feel emboldened to do this because we currently have historically weak leadership who will do fuck-all about it

      So...that's why the current leadership is hitting China where it hurts the most? You know where that is right, it's in their pocket book. The same one that the politburo is now worried about, and saying that the tariffs are causing a lot of problems. And they're so worried that they're willing to take on more debt, while things are getting so bad in China that companies can't even make debt payments in funds to creditors...so they're trying to use food as a form of debt-payment.

      The Chinese will run circles around this dope.

      The Chinese ran circles around Obama, and his entire administration. Including the part where they got Obama to agree to a treaty to share technology including critical technology. And did the exact opposite of anything he asked for, and thumbed their nose at illegal selling of goods to N.Korea.

      I dare you to name one country that Trump has been "tough" with (besides the United States). He's basically been the whole world's punching bag since he's been elected.

      Oh look...a progressive has morphed into a neocon. You mean besides China? Including sanctions against russian banks, and iranian banks for breaking sanctions with n.korea. Or the part where he told nato members to pay their fucking share or the US would pull out.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    8. Re:Fire drill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    9. Re: Fire drill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obama was pretty tough too. He illegally murdered American ctizens abroad with drone strikes.

  14. Line in the sand? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Should Big O come out and declare the line has been crossed? He did so many times...but nothing about his "lines"....

  15. And a great resounding "Duh" was heard all across by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the land...

    That is their main game plan. China is like Darlocks and Klackons combined.. You can't win if you just play Psilon against them unless you go all the way up the skill tree fast enough to unlock both phasing cloak and black hole generator before they develop/steal doom stars. or maybe if you are the first to Antares and unlock Loknar.

  16. US claims it does no economic spying... by rapjr · · Score: 1

    but I think there are loopholes. The NSA and CIA are tasked by Congress and give the reports to Congress. So the NSA/CIA can say they do no economic spying, but the congresspeople can whisper what they know to their donors and corporate friends. Or some economic spying can be "in the interest of national security". Leaks have indicated that the US spied on other countries as part of the lead up to trade conferences so the US could cheat:
    https://medium.com/economic-po...
    Is that not spying for economic gain?

  17. Shenzhen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If all it takes to compete with you is a bunch of little guys with boxes, switches, and logos, then you might want to think about getting a gravestone and laying down already.

  18. The point you are all missing is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That absolutely nobody disagrees that China is cheating. In spite of their bribes, threats and paid and unpaid shills, everyone knows they cheat and steal like hell. Question is, what do we do about it?

  19. that deal was a joke by WindBourne · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Just like China's deal with Japan, China's deal with Clinton/WTO, China's deal with O concerning stopping their emissions growth, etc. etc. etc.
    China is in a cold war with the west, and is winning. It is to the determent of humanity since China continues to emit far far more CO2 than what they claim.
    However, the real issue with that, is that China's real goal is to stop importing oil so they are not dependent on other nations. That way, they can attack Taiwan and deal with a 5+ year war. The problem is, that the west has helped them.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:that deal was a joke by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Considering the USA's track record of attacking neutral countries - how many illegal undeclared wars are going out right now? - and China's record of not having any wars since...well the founding of the PRC? Even before then they didn't invade foreign countries. They got royally screwed by the West though. Why are we saying a world under Chinese leadership would be a worse place? The USA is the biggest warmonger and murderer, hands down.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    2. Re:that deal was a joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are still twice as clean as America. Just 4 times as big.
      Lucky America is a tiny little country so they are allowed to be twice as polluting per person and no one bats an eye.

    3. Re:that deal was a joke by Mashiki · · Score: 2

      You mean besides their wars with russia, annexing tibet, and so on? And of course violating territory, mineral, oil, gas, and other various treaties and laws in the south china sea, and militarizing them to the point that Japan is looking to get back into the 'we have an active military, and we might just go nuclear while we're at it.'

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    4. Re: that deal was a joke by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      EVERYBODY bats an eye at this. Only idiots like you think it is ok for China to keep increasing their CO2. The rest of us think that both America and China are polluting too much and need to drop .

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    5. Re: that deal was a joke by WindBourne · · Score: 2

      Yeah. Another person that comments without understanding it. Move to China or north Korea for what you want. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wik...

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    6. Re: that deal was a joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Way to prove his point. All those wars are in the distant past. America is bombing people all over the world TODAY !

      Even Saudi Arabia where they routinely murder people who disagree with them, you help them bomb civilians. Sell them weapons.

      Your head is firmly stuck up your arse, but you still can't see shit.

    7. Re: that deal was a joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China is extremely good at showing exactly what they want you to see. They're a country that thinks absolutely nothing of killing some students over a protest, then makes it illegal to talk about the whole thing. They're like a very successful North Korea. You should fear Chinese expansion.

  20. It's only bad when China does it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's only bad when China does it.
    --
    WindBourne

    https://slashdot.org/~WindBourne

  21. Ironic by reanjr · · Score: 1

    Anyone find that weird?

    "Sure, you can spy on our government or military and steal our most heavily guarded secrets, but we draw the line at making iPhone clones."

  22. Get back to us when you cut yours in half to match by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Explain again why China needs to drop when they are already twice as clean as the US?
    People like you like to stamp your feet loudly and shout at China as a distraction so no one will notice the truth. Per person China only emits 1/2 the CO2 as America.

  23. How to combat forced tech transfer to China by larryjoe · · Score: 1

    With regards to Chinese theft of American IP via espionage and Chinese laws that force the "lawful" handover of IP, what has Trump done? Tariffs do nothing to combat this theft. This IP theft is where China is trying to gain a competitive advantage that will last far into the future.

    Thinking further about this topic, Trump's tariffs have no direct impact on Chinese theft of American IP. However, ironically Chinese retaliatory tariffs do help to blunt this theft by slightly disincentivizing American sales in China, the need to partner with Chinese companies, and the resulting required "lawful" technology transfer to Chinese companies. It's unclear which tech transfer mechanism is more helpful for the Chinese, outright theft or forced transfer via pay-to-play and forced partnership laws, but both seemed to have been helpful in the past.

  24. Re:Get back to us when you cut yours in half to ma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    China Emits More Carbon Dioxide Than The U.S. and EU Combined
    And that is before adding in the new coal plants that China is adding before 2020, which will be more than what U.S. does. China will then emit more than the entire west or what EU combined with 2x U.S..

    Bloody gits like you have your head in a bog and do not care one bit about the globe.