Slashdot Mirror


China Violated Obama-Era Cybertheft Pact, U.S. Official Says (marketwatch.com)

China has violated an accord it signed with the U.S. three years ago pledging not to engage in hacking for the purpose of economic espionage, a senior U.S. intelligence official said this week. From a report: The 2015 bilateral agreement had significantly reduced the amount of Chinese cybertheft targeting American companies, but Beijing's commitment to the deal has eroded, said Rob Joyce, senior adviser for cybersecurity strategy at the National Security Agency. "It is clear they are well beyond the bounds of the agreement today that was forged between our two countries," Joyce said during a panel conversation at the Aspen Cyber Summit.

Joyce's comments were the latest sign of Washington's rising frustration over China's alleged violation of the pact signed between then-President Barack Obama and Chinese President Xi Jinping. Last week, then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions also said China wasn't adhering to the deal, in which the U.S. and China agreed not to conduct cyber operations against each other to steal intellectual property or other forms of economic intelligence.

24 of 74 comments (clear)

  1. No details by XXongo · · Score: 1
    Hmm-- the article doesn't give any details about exactly how, when and where China "engaged in hacking for the purpose of economic espionage".

    The article says there's a longer article at Wall Street Journal, but it's paywalled: https://www.wsj.com/articles/c...

  2. And by DarkOx · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I mean lets be honest here; nobody is going to do jack about it. We don't ever do anything about China's bad behavior except 'talk' and maybe sell some weapons systems to Taiwan.

    China unlike Russia is real threat to us and all anyone in our government; with the occasional (and only occasional) exception being Trump cares to do anything about it.

    The talking heads will cry about how important free trade is while we literally let all our industrial and defense secrets walk out the door.

    Trump 2020!

    --
    Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    1. Re:And by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1, Funny

      but.. but the orange man is always, always universally bad isn't he?

    2. Re:And by BringsApples · · Score: 1

      Sports, religion, politics - all have die-hard fans, but DAMN those fans annoy the rest of us.

      --
      Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
    3. Re:And by guruevi · · Score: 1

      It's not like the US wasn't violating the pact the day of signing. This was merely virtue signaling by an inept administration, nobody expects those to be upheld.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    4. Re:And by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      China is the threat, not Russia? Sounds like that was written from the internet research agency in St. Petersburg. Nice try, Ivan, it won't work. You think they're having kasha for lunch today? About lunchtime there, isn't it?

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    5. Re:And by mrclevesque · · Score: 1

      Exactly. It looks like a probable motivation for this US official's 'intelligence leak' is the US is doing it more (and better) and it's only recently that China has started catching up.

    6. Re:And by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      Well lets see

      Russia can't reasonably resist us militarily in virtually any theater.

      Russia's economy is nearly irrelevant to our own. It could collapse to today and Wall street would hardly bat an eye.

      Russia does not have the productive capacity to dump in other markets; other than perhaps in unskilled labor products and maybe for a short while oil/gas. In this sense they are as grave a threat to us as say most of the middle east.

      ----
      Meanwhile China, at least if they are willing to cut the nose off to spite the face - absolutely can make us miserable today.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
  3. Terrible Quandry by ilsaloving · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wow, this must be a down right terrible quandry from Trump.

    He has to choose between China, or an Obama-era agreement that works in his favour.

  4. I am not saying this is Karma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But if Trump throw out the nuclear agreement with Iran, why would anyone insist China has to stick with their agreement with the US?

  5. My 0.02 by DaMattster · · Score: 1

    Why try and develop the technology when you can steal it? I guess that is what the Chinese Government thinks.

  6. Re:Fire drill by gtall · · Score: 1

    Well...there's that and also this comes from the Justice Dept. who must have gotten it from the FBI. Now we know that the FBI is a hotbed of Democrats intent on screwing el Presidente Tweetie because...because...they like fake news, immigrants, and premarital intercourse. Hmmm...maybe that caravan in Mexico is actually a Chinese caravan. It makes sense, they are coming here to built a Great Wall to keep Americans in. And the aliens, I'm sure the little green fellers are mixed in with it somewhere...Chinese alien migrants from a different galaxy here to destroy America!!!

  7. Re:Fire drill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Yeah. Let's blame it on Trump and forget all about Bill Clinton who started this catastrophic avalanche by granting Communist China Most Favored Nation status; George W. Bush who did nothing when it should have been obvious that China was not going to play by the rules with respect to fair trade, IP protection, and industrial espionage; and Barack Obama who also did nothing even though is was even more obvious that China is not a partner to be trusted. None of Clinton, W. Bush, or Obama even so much as peeped about the terribly unfair trade relationship between the U.S. and China.

    Whether Trump accomplishes anything useful or not, at least he has publicly and vociferously verbalized a problem that many Americans see.

  8. US claims it does no economic spying... by rapjr · · Score: 1

    but I think there are loopholes. The NSA and CIA are tasked by Congress and give the reports to Congress. So the NSA/CIA can say they do no economic spying, but the congresspeople can whisper what they know to their donors and corporate friends. Or some economic spying can be "in the interest of national security". Leaks have indicated that the US spied on other countries as part of the lead up to trade conferences so the US could cheat:
    https://medium.com/economic-po...
    Is that not spying for economic gain?

  9. Re:Fire drill by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    Yeah. Let's blame it on Trump and forget all about Bill Clinton who started this catastrophic avalanche by granting Communist China Most Favored Nation status

    You can blame whomever you want. I'm just telling you why all these countries are taking advantage of the US right now..

    You remember those "tough sanctions" that Trump was going to put on Iran? He even released a meme, using the Game of Thrones font, with a picture of himself looking "tough" (apparently, "tough" is one of his favorite words), and the meme said, "Sanctions are Coming". Oh boy. Well, it turns out that those sanctions included a long list of waivers for Iran's biggest trading partners (China, India, South Korea, Japan, Italy, Greece, Taiwan and Turkey) so their basically not sanctions at all. That's why the oil market's been surprised by the fact that the price of oil has only gone down, which is exactly the opposite of what you'd expect to happen if Iran was being blocked from selling oil.

    I dare you to name one country that Trump has been "tough" with (besides the United States). He's basically been the whole world's punching bag since he's been elected.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  10. Re:Fire drill by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    He was pretty fucking toughed when he bombed Syria twice. That's something Obama could never muster the resolve to do.

    He bombed Syria after warning them to move their planes. The only damage was to an airfield that was fixed within days. Do you really not remember how it happened?

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  11. that deal was a joke by WindBourne · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Just like China's deal with Japan, China's deal with Clinton/WTO, China's deal with O concerning stopping their emissions growth, etc. etc. etc.
    China is in a cold war with the west, and is winning. It is to the determent of humanity since China continues to emit far far more CO2 than what they claim.
    However, the real issue with that, is that China's real goal is to stop importing oil so they are not dependent on other nations. That way, they can attack Taiwan and deal with a 5+ year war. The problem is, that the west has helped them.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:that deal was a joke by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Considering the USA's track record of attacking neutral countries - how many illegal undeclared wars are going out right now? - and China's record of not having any wars since...well the founding of the PRC? Even before then they didn't invade foreign countries. They got royally screwed by the West though. Why are we saying a world under Chinese leadership would be a worse place? The USA is the biggest warmonger and murderer, hands down.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    2. Re:that deal was a joke by Mashiki · · Score: 2

      You mean besides their wars with russia, annexing tibet, and so on? And of course violating territory, mineral, oil, gas, and other various treaties and laws in the south china sea, and militarizing them to the point that Japan is looking to get back into the 'we have an active military, and we might just go nuclear while we're at it.'

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    3. Re: that deal was a joke by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      EVERYBODY bats an eye at this. Only idiots like you think it is ok for China to keep increasing their CO2. The rest of us think that both America and China are polluting too much and need to drop .

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    4. Re: that deal was a joke by WindBourne · · Score: 2

      Yeah. Another person that comments without understanding it. Move to China or north Korea for what you want. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wik...

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  12. Re:Fire drill by Mashiki · · Score: 1

    The Chinese (as well as several other countries) feel emboldened to do this because we currently have historically weak leadership who will do fuck-all about it

    So...that's why the current leadership is hitting China where it hurts the most? You know where that is right, it's in their pocket book. The same one that the politburo is now worried about, and saying that the tariffs are causing a lot of problems. And they're so worried that they're willing to take on more debt, while things are getting so bad in China that companies can't even make debt payments in funds to creditors...so they're trying to use food as a form of debt-payment.

    The Chinese will run circles around this dope.

    The Chinese ran circles around Obama, and his entire administration. Including the part where they got Obama to agree to a treaty to share technology including critical technology. And did the exact opposite of anything he asked for, and thumbed their nose at illegal selling of goods to N.Korea.

    I dare you to name one country that Trump has been "tough" with (besides the United States). He's basically been the whole world's punching bag since he's been elected.

    Oh look...a progressive has morphed into a neocon. You mean besides China? Including sanctions against russian banks, and iranian banks for breaking sanctions with n.korea. Or the part where he told nato members to pay their fucking share or the US would pull out.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
  13. Ironic by reanjr · · Score: 1

    Anyone find that weird?

    "Sure, you can spy on our government or military and steal our most heavily guarded secrets, but we draw the line at making iPhone clones."

  14. How to combat forced tech transfer to China by larryjoe · · Score: 1

    With regards to Chinese theft of American IP via espionage and Chinese laws that force the "lawful" handover of IP, what has Trump done? Tariffs do nothing to combat this theft. This IP theft is where China is trying to gain a competitive advantage that will last far into the future.

    Thinking further about this topic, Trump's tariffs have no direct impact on Chinese theft of American IP. However, ironically Chinese retaliatory tariffs do help to blunt this theft by slightly disincentivizing American sales in China, the need to partner with Chinese companies, and the resulting required "lawful" technology transfer to Chinese companies. It's unclear which tech transfer mechanism is more helpful for the Chinese, outright theft or forced transfer via pay-to-play and forced partnership laws, but both seemed to have been helpful in the past.