Slashdot Mirror


Democrats Intend To Probe Ivanka Trump's Use of Personal Email In Next Congress (go.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from ABC News: Amid reports that first daughter and White House senior advisor Ivanka Trump exchanged hundreds of official government business emails using a personal email account, top Democrats on Capitol Hill "want to know if Ivanka complied with the law" and in the next Congress plan to continue their investigation of the Presidential Records Act and Federal Records Act. Rep. Elijah Cummings, the ranking Democrat who's in line to become the next chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee next year, promises any potential investigation into Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump's emails won't be like the "spectacle" Republicans led in the Clinton email probe.

The Oversight committee has jurisdiction over records and transparency laws, and Cummings helped write an update to the Presidential and Federal Records Acts that was signed into law by President Barack Obama in 2014. That measure mandates that every federal employee, including the President, forward any message about official business sent using a private account to the employee's official email account within 20 days.
"We launched a bipartisan investigation last year into White House officials' use of private email accounts for official business, but the White House never gave us the information we requested," Cummings, D-Md., noted. "We need those documents to ensure that Ivanka Trump, Jared Kushner, and other officials are complying with federal records laws and there is a complete record of the activities of this Administration. My goal is to prevent this from happening again -- not to turn this into a spectacle the way Republicans went after Hillary Clinton. My main priority as Chairman will be to focus on the issues that impact Americans in their everyday lives."

8 of 407 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Fair is fair by CanHasDIY · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Agreed - the only legitimate way to reconcile this is for both parties to admit to manipulating the system for their own gain, and to the detriment of the American People.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  2. Was anything classified? by Sniper98G · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Everyone keeps comparing this to what Hillary did. Not sure why.

    She was using a non-government account for government business. Hillary set us her own email sever in an unoccupied house and transferred classified information on to it.

    These things are not comparable.

  3. Re:Before everyone goes crazy again... by DaHat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Usually, any criminal statutes require knowledge and intent of the crime being committed.

    Usually... yes, however the statutes Hillary violated has no mens rea requirement: https://www.law.cornell.edu/us...

    So nice of you to try to move the goal posts.

    What's next? Screams of "but they weren't classified at the time"?

  4. Re:ORANGE MAN BAD by Locke2005 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So your solution is "Stop reminding me that the orange man is bad!" rather than "Can't the orange man STOP being bad?"

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  5. Re:ORANGE MAN BAD by shilly · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Because the orange man keeps on doing so much bad stuff. The floods of bad stuff are so gigantic that Slashdot barely covers any of it, and yet it still dominates the feed.

  6. Re: ORANGE MAN BAD by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why do you believe that? Objectively why?

    Well, let's start out with the most recent: Just a few hours ago, Donald Trump voiced his full & unwavering support for a Saudi leader who had a legal United States resident murdered, cut into pieces and his bones dissolved in acid. And this is a day after the story broke that his administration tried to help the Saudi leader cover up the murder and gave him advice on how to deflect the blame onto someone else. I'm pretty sure that on the morality scale, that falls somewhere South of "good"

    We can work backwards from there, but it might take a while because it's a very long list.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  7. Re:Fair is fair by meglon · · Score: 5, Informative

    She'll only be able to offer those up after 2 years and 4 months of investigations into EVERYTHING that anyone suggests, including all of her business dealings with China, and how her trademarks got approved days after the China's government got beneficial treatment from her father.

    There were 8 investigations COMPLETED prior to the house investigation, and none of them found any wrongdoing. The house investigation was 2 years and 4 months; it was longer than the congressional probes into 9/11, Watergate, the JFK assassination and Pearl Harbor. During Bush Jr's terms, there were 39 attacks or attempted attacks on embassies or staff, with 87 deaths. The cumulative amount of time spent on congressional investigations of these 39 attacks: 0 mins.

    On Fox news (Sept 29, 2015), Kevin McCarthy (Republican) stated: “Everybody thought Hillary Clinton was unbeatable, right? But we put together a Benghazi special committee, a select committee. What are her numbers today?”

    The house Benghazi investigation was never anything more than the GOP abusing their offices to damage Hillary in the upcoming presidential race because they knew she was running. Anyone who's not a complete fucking idiot could see that, but sadly, we have a lot of complete fucking idiots in this country.

    --
    Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
  8. Re:Fair is fair by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 5, Insightful
    As long as the FBI follows the same procedure as with Hillary:
    1. An exoneration letter is drafted in advance.
    2. Immunity is given to top Trump aides (and they're allowed to sit in on the interview).
    3. The interview isn't recorded.
    4. The lead official doesn't attend.
    5. The #2 official's family has received large donations from Trump's political friends.
    6. Prior to the interview, the lead official meets privately on plane tarmac with Trump's wife (to discuss grandchildren).
    7. Main interviewer has expressed disdain for Trump's opponents, such as discussing an "insurance plan" with higher-ups to undermine them. If the same terms aren't offered...Was Clinton's interview process unfair?
    8. As long as they believe Ivanka didn't intend any harm, she's let off the hook for any violations.
    9. If Ivanka becomes a target, it should be referred to as a "matter" not an investigation.
    10. Trump aides should be permitted to destroy subpoenaed or relevant public records and wipe relevant servers with a cloth or something.
    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!