Slashdot Mirror


YouTube is Testing Having Two Skippable Ads Back-To-Back (cnet.com)

If you hate having your video binging session on YouTube interrupted by multiple ad breaks, the good news is that things are about to change. CNET: The streaming platform is rolling out a new tweak to its video watching experience, by placing two skippable ads back-to-back, which it says will reduce the number of ad interruptions later in the video -- up to 40 percent less in a session, according to the company's blog post Wednesday.

181 comments

  1. Blocking Back-To-Back Ads by AHuxley · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ad blocking add-ons are testing blocking back-to-back ads.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    1. Re:Blocking Back-To-Back Ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Testing? It already works very well. I've never even seen an ad on YouTube.

      I support the creators I like via Patreon. Fuck Google.

    2. Re: Blocking Back-To-Back Ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good thing we have someone like you with personal experience in that area to make the comparison for the rest of us.

    3. Re: Blocking Back-To-Back Ads by aussie_a · · Score: 0, Troll

      That's gay

    4. Re:Blocking Back-To-Back Ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, I skipped Youtube, 2 days back to back! Didn't miss a thing.

    5. Re:Blocking Back-To-Back Ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ads? U-Tube ads ?? I have never seen one.

    6. Re: Blocking Back-To-Back Ads by Flavianoep · · Score: 1

      A load of what?

      --
      Linux is for people who don't mind RTFM.
    7. Re: Blocking Back-To-Back Ads by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      AIDS obviously

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    8. Re:Blocking Back-To-Back Ads by dohzer · · Score: 1

      Same for me I don't miss anything either. I love how YouTube saves it all so I can watch it later and not miss an episode. Hooray!

  2. Does Youtube still have ads? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    I'd forgotten it ever did.

    1. Re:Does Youtube still have ads? by Iwastheone · · Score: 5, Informative

      Really, what are these 'ads on YouTube' that I occasionally hear of? I don't see them. Then again, AdBlockPlus, UBlock Origin and Privacy Badger seem to have something to do with it, methinks.

    2. Re:Does Youtube still have ads? by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

      Never see them on a desktop but blocking them via phone is more difficult. I guess you could root your Android and add a hosts file.

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    3. Re:Does Youtube still have ads? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Never seen one :)

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    4. Re:Does Youtube still have ads? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YouTube on a phone? That sounds like some sort of torture. Why would you want to watch something on such a small screen?

    5. Re: Does Youtube still have ads? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My phone screen is three times the resolution of the first desktop I ever used.

      And it fits into my hand.

    6. Re:Does Youtube still have ads? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you seriously run all of those at the same time? uBlock Origin handles everything all by itself just fine.

      Then there is NoScript for the really annoying sites (mostly old-media and news sites).

    7. Re: Does Youtube still have ads? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So if you don't watch on a phone, then there's no reason why anyone ever should?

      Some people commute on trains and buses, some people bring headphones for times when they're waiting in a doctor's office, some people have decent eye sight and don't mind a small screen.

      A hand-held phone can easily fill as much of your vision as a large TV does from the couch.

    8. Re:Does Youtube still have ads? by helllllllloooo · · Score: 1

      I never see ads on the clips I watch. Yesterday I saw a special on Emily Dickinson, followed by a Mary Shelley biography. Not an ad in sight.

    9. Re:Does Youtube still have ads? by Shikaku · · Score: 1

      Youtube streams the ads on Android so you can't block them with a hosts file or any other blocking software even if you wanted to. Just don't use the official client or use the web version.

    10. Re: Does Youtube still have ads? by DarkVader · · Score: 1

      I didn't watch videos on the first desktop I ever used.

      I didn't watch videos on the second.

      Nor the third.

      The fourth was the first one that could run QuickTime. And the video was pretty bad, because while the screen couldn't fit in my hand, my hand could cover the video window.

      I don't want to watch video in my hand. This 15" laptop is a bit small for it.

    11. Re: Does Youtube still have ads? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or just skip the ads.

    12. Re:Does Youtube still have ads? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vivaldi + uBlock Origin + uMatrix + Dark Reader = Pleasant internet experience.

    13. Re: Does Youtube still have ads? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've heard APK Hosts Fie Engine blocks all the ads. And all the videos. And it cleans your car and gives you a blowie afterwards.

    14. Re:Does Youtube still have ads? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never see them on a desktop but blocking them via phone is more difficult. I guess you could root your Android and add a hosts file.

      Use NewPipe from the F-Droid open source repos. Youtube, with no ads, backgrond play that actually works, the option to download the video for offline viewing at any quality level in your choice of WebM or MP4.

    15. Re:Does Youtube still have ads? by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      I think there is an apk for that

    16. Re: Does Youtube still have ads? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop being a faggot c6gummer

    17. Re:Does Youtube still have ads? by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2

      Android TV is pretty good for set top boxes. I use a couple of nVidia Shields around the house, for paid streaming services, plus Kodi for locally stored content, and I can stream Steam games from the big rig in the office. And watch Youtube... unfortunately I can't block the ads on Android TV.

      Speaking of torture, it took years before Google finally rolled out their premium Youtube subscriptions in this country. And I noticed that they really stepped up the ads a couple of months before. They went from having a skippable ad at the beginning of a video every so often, to having more of these and some of them unskippable, to having more and more ads during videos. So I got the paid subscription... I don't mind paying for a service if it's ad-free. As long as they don't get greedy and start showing ads to paid subscribers, while slowly reducing the payout to streamers. I guess it's only a matter of time before we'll "cut the cord" on Youtube as well...

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    18. Re: Does Youtube still have ads? by stooo · · Score: 1

      skip the ads ?
      You have to tap to do that !
      Use automation. Use an ad blocker.
      Get free from all the effort and slavery to skip to the next ad.

      --
      aaaaaaa
    19. Re: Does Youtube still have ads? by houghi · · Score: 1

      I think that google is so smart that it shows ads that people are interested in. That is what they keep saying. They just know that I am not interested in them. That must be it.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    20. Re:Does Youtube still have ads? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is uBlock Origin still needed when you use uMatrix ?

    21. Re:Does Youtube still have ads? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It blocks ads hosted by the site itself.

    22. Re:Does Youtube still have ads? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uBlock Origin automatically updates its ad blocking list and allows you to block specific page elements. uMatrix is for more generally controlling scripts, CSS, cookies, media, embedded frames, etc. on a site by site basis. They work best when used together, although it would be interesting to see a merged extension with the capabilities of both.

    23. Re:Does Youtube still have ads? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just use AdAway on my phone. As far as I know it uses hosts to block ads, so it should block them in apps too. I never use any software that has ads or IAPs so I don't know for certain.

    24. Re:Does Youtube still have ads? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never see them on a desktop but blocking them via phone is more difficult. I guess you could root your Android and add a hosts file.

      Use NewPipe from the F-Droid open source repos. Youtube, with no ads, backgrond play that actually works, the option to download the video for offline viewing at any quality level in your choice of WebM or MP4.

      Second this. NewPipe rocks!

    25. Re: Does Youtube still have ads? by argStyopa · · Score: 1

      I don't know that they do.
      I run 2/3 of them (never heard of PB) and I get the usual shit ton of ads.
      I know someone who, running only ublock because I made him do it, NEVER gets ads on YouTube. Never. It's astonishing, but somehow I suspect he's fallen through some database crack in the system. Maybe he's not the only one?

      --
      -Styopa
    26. Re:Does Youtube still have ads? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uBlock Origin in Advanced Mode lets you use it similarly to uMatrix if you want to do it all in one extension. I prefer uMatrix's UI, though, so I still use both.

    27. Re: Does Youtube still have ads? by ncc74656 · · Score: 1

      With the different ad blockers I've used over the years (currently using uBlock on Chrome), I've never had YouTube ads come through on the desktop. The YouTube plugin for Kodi (probably how I watch most YouTube videos nowadays) doesn't show any ads either, despite the lack of an ad blocker in Kodi. The only place where an ad might show up is in the YouTube Android app (despite having AdGuard running), but I rarely use that.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    28. Re: Does Youtube still have ads? by green1 · · Score: 1

      On Android I use vanced. No ads, otherwise it's the same as the official client. Find it on xda.

      Ublock stops all ads on my laptop too. The only time I see ads is if I use the TV set top box, so there's a reason I never do that.

    29. Re:Does Youtube still have ads? by green1 · · Score: 1

      Android use vanced. It's the official client, but with the ads stripped out and a few extra features. Find it on xda.

    30. Re: Does Youtube still have ads? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And it fits into my hand.

      Yeah, well I've got something else that fits in my hand too, but I don't want it anywhere near YoTube.

      A sandwich.... What, you thought I meant something else?

  3. Youtube has ads??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well this is news to me, I've been browsing Youtube for years without a single ad. I mean really, who DOESN'T use an adblocker these days?

    1. Re: Youtube has ads??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you know an ad blocker that works in the YouTube app on Android?

    2. Re: Youtube has ads??? by Shikaku · · Score: 1

      Youtube streams the ads on Android so you can't block them with a hosts file or any other blocking software even if you wanted to. Just don't use the official client or use the web version.

      Eh I'm just gonna quote myself because I looked and know the answer already.

    3. Re: Youtube has ads??? by nnull · · Score: 1

      Yes, root your phone and it works. Oh wait, you can't root your phone anymore? Because why would you want to root your phone, right? There's no need to root your phone!

      Meanwhile, I enjoy ad free watching youtube on my phone. I can also play youtube in the background too without it having it pause.

    4. Re: Youtube has ads??? by green1 · · Score: 1

      My phone isn't rooted, but I still block ads. Sideload vanced from xda to get ad free YouTube, and background play. For the browser you can get ad blocking browsers, or add blockers that use a VPN. Personally I'm using my own VPN which blocks ads with DNS.

      I used to root every time, but I got tired of the constant battle, and the big features I needed can now be done without it (ad blocking, and setting the phone to a reasonable resolution)

  4. Re:You people need to STOP BULLYING ME... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *triggered*

  5. Youtube has ads? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could've fooled me.

  6. A new idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Congratulations to Youtube for inventing the commercial break. This will surely be an idea loved by all!

    1. Re: A new idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pretty much means they are broke

    2. Re:A new idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, now let's see if they can truly innovate and come up with the ad letterbox!

    3. Re: A new idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their alternative is you pay a monthly fee for their exciting new subscriber service, to go ad-free and also have access to all of their exciting channels. I mean really exciting. Channels. Of fun. Woohoo!

    4. Re: A new idea! by stooo · · Score: 1

      Youtube has been broke from day one.
      The pretty much never made a profit, but that's irrelevant.

      --
      aaaaaaa
    5. Re: A new idea! by teg · · Score: 1

      Their alternative is you pay a monthly fee for their exciting new subscriber service, to go ad-free and also have access to all of their exciting channels. I mean really exciting. Channels. Of fun. Woohoo!

      The problem with that is that they only offer that as an add-on to their latest failing Spotify-competitor. You cannot subscribe to it stand-alone.

  7. What ads? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I haven't seen an ad on youtube for years.

  8. Are they not the same fucking ad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I remember trying to use the YouTube feature of a smart TV for some reason (so no ad blocking) and what I discovered was that YouTube would constantly show me the same fucking unskippable ad for every single video we watched. I think we watched like five different videos before deciding that watching videos via this "feature" was dumb (turns out the built-in smart TV apps tend to be terrible, I know, shocking news) but what I remember most was that every single video was preceded by the exact same ad for some game for a console I don't own.

    I'm not 100% anti-ad (I think it's probably possible to do it in such a way that it's not annoying) but god damn do the ad platforms go out of their way to be so annoying that eventually you throw up your hands and just block everything. Not to mention the added security you get by doing so.

    1. Re: Are they not the same fucking ad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was a mouthful - now Iâ(TM)m thirsty for a glass of sun-dried decaf tea

    2. Re:Are they not the same fucking ad? by 110010001000 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That is because the online ad system is a joke. Google shows the same ads over and over and are completely irrelevant. I don't know why companies still pour money into online advertising. It isn't targeted well at all.

    3. Re:Are they not the same fucking ad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's especially hilarious if you sometimes watch videos on YouTube with small kids. The targeting system apparently doesn't consider the content of the videos you're watching. Or, well, no. I'd bet that it does, but it's only considered in aggregate, so it just determines the entire pool of ads you might get. So you go to watch some Sesame Street video with a three year old via something that doesn't allow ad blocking and get an ad for something completely inappropriate.

      I wish it were for things that were at least funny like for condoms or erectile dysfunction medicine, but instead it's ads for things like R rated movies in front of your video of Elmo. (OK, not really, since I'm fairly sure that the official Sesame Street account is allowed to police the ads placed on their videos. But it absolutely will do it for similar YouTube videos for children posted by people without the clout to limit what's allowed to advertise on their videos.)

      Which, of course, just leads to ad blockers being required for anyone who knows small children, in order to not have to explain why all those people were on fire before showing them that video of someone singing their ABCs.

    4. Re:Are they not the same fucking ad? by MrMr · · Score: 1

      Well, you should be happy. Irrelevant ads cost you less than those from companies you might actually buy stuff from.

    5. Re:Are they not the same fucking ad? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Well, occasionally, when I feel the need for a goof, I turn adblocking off when watching videos debunking some snakeoil, and usually it seems fairly reliable that I get ads for exactly the snakeoil the video debunks.

      The system works!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    6. Re:Are they not the same fucking ad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just a couple of days ago an ad for The Meg appeared while my 3 year old daughter was watching Super Simple Songs. Ok, so it's a PG-13 movie, but the ad opens with a massive tooth-filled mouth approaching a little girl. I don't know if she noticed (other than that she was annoyed that her songs were interrupted) but I was pretty horrified. This was on my Roku TV using the YouTube app so I'm not aware of being able to use ad-blocking.

    7. Re:Are they not the same fucking ad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love how YouTube insists on showing ads for inkjet printers whenever I search for 3D printing related content on my phone.

  9. Cable TV Wins! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Youtube will be like cable TV.

    it will show me the same shitty two ads, hoping that they are relevant.

    what really happens, is youtube runs in another tab, where I ignore the ad completely, or mute the tab.

    1. Re:Cable TV Wins! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      The main difference being that you don't have to record the movie so you can skip the ad breaks watching it but you can simply block the ads while watching.

      Other than that, yes, YouTube becomes more and more like cable TV.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  10. Youtube has ads? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When did Youtube get ads? I don't think I've ever seen an ad on Youtube. ** This comment submitted using firefox on ubuntu with Adblock and Noscript **

  11. Tech Bubble is over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The bloated, tumorous mass that is Alphabet is reaching the end of it natural lifecycle.
    Like the giant Dinosaurs of the Cretatious, tech companies have grown too massive, too specialized, and too homogeneous, needed ever more massive revenues simple to sustain the bloating overheads. Two ads. Three ads. Ten ads. When you're 3 stories tall and defecate piles larger than most other animals, you're always hungry for more.
    But they are more vulnerable than ever to any oncoming "extinction event". In our case, likely a fiscal contraction brought about by some fumbling central bank, or a geo-political disaster brought to us by our genius ruling class.
    Or hell, maybe people will just get tired of "high-tech" companies with a hundred thousand "smart guys" who can't seem to produce software or applications that even matches functionality commonplace 15 years ago, and who keep screwing up what we have left that's working, and who all seem to get paid 5 times more than anyone else actually producing something. The bigger Amazon gets, the less surprised I'll become of any sudden acceptance of nationalization among the growing American plebian class.

    But I digress. Because let's be honest people. How many of you ever considered Youtube to be something worth paying for?

    1. Re:Tech Bubble is over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, you know Google is in trouble when Eric Schmidt (who doesn't even have an actual role at the company anymore) is on CNBC talking about how Google used to be jerks interviewing people literally 16 times, but now they've halved that, and in many cases it only takes 4-5 interviews to get hired. And unlike in the early days, when they would only consider hiring Stanford grads, they've decided to start accepting applications from a wide range of plebeian trash from places like state schools, and even no degree at all! Well, let me dust off my resume right away Mr. Schmidt! Actually, no, fuck Google.

    2. Re:Tech Bubble is over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean the adware bubble is over.

    3. Re:Tech Bubble is over by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      My wife likes to watch a couple of Youtube streamers, and I sometimes watch instructional videos for work or hobbies (I prefer text but beggars can't always be choosers I suppose). We got so sick of the ads that we got a subscription. Worth it, in my opinion, even if it doesn't compare to Netflix in terms of € per hour of use.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    4. Re: Tech Bubble is over by houghi · · Score: 1

      I knew it was over when the first ads showed up. When Google raped Dejanews. Call it the King-Midas-Complex. Everybody tries to turn things into gold. Well, that brraks a lot. You see this in many other things, like books, movies, music, sports, ...
      It works, because people like shiney things.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    5. Re:Tech Bubble is over by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I'm so sick of the ads that I'm going to install a proxy to kill them. We still watch on the fire tv stick and having an ad play before almost every damned video we watch is already garbage.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:Tech Bubble is over by RuiFRibeiro · · Score: 1

      Bloackada and Youtube Vanced for Android, Ublock origin on other platforms work pretty well keeping ads at bay, including in my Chromecast. No subscription. I also keep my country of origin as Canada for reducing the inane quantity of garbage that my country fellows post.

  12. Part of the roadmap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    1. Back to back ads with reduced frequency.
    2. Increased ad frequency.
    3. Back to back to back ads with reduced ad frequency.
    4. Increased frequency of ads.
    5. Ads consume at least 6 minutes per half hour and are arranged into added-value blocks called 'commercial breaks'.

    1. Re:Part of the roadmap by religionofpeas · · Score: 4, Informative

      I've already stopped watching 99% of youtube on mobile because of the ads. Only when I'm really particularly interested in watching that video right now, I'll play the ad. Otherwise, I wait until I can get my laptop with adblock.

    2. Re:Part of the roadmap by rtb61 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I am a customer, trying to watch a youtube video. You, the fuck knuckle advertiser demand I watch the ad you want to scream at me first, will I buy your product, come on honestly will I buy your product, NO, I can not emphasise how much no. You are not selling me fucking anything except a hatred of your company, it is simply the way it is. I watch bugger all ads, I mean seriously bugger all, I pay for the bulk of my content, trying to force me to watch, what is now, an extremely annoying advertisement, does not make me want to do business with you, it makes me hate you, A WHOLE FUCKING LOT.

      Ads on youtube can only work after content, voluntarily. Sure more will watch the ad at the beginning but you stupid fucking advertisers will not be selling anything other than annoyance and they will remember the cause of the annoyance, you fucking POS ad.

      It's nothing like old idiot box ads, 15 minutes of every hour of viewing, people became accustomed, now, well, one or two ads a day and they really stand out in the worst way possible, pretty much a street side hawker running into your lounge room screaming at you that you buy the product and the only thing you remember fuck that company and fuck that product.

      OK people, honesty time, how many of you people have bought a product based upon a YouTube ad and how many of you have not bought a product because of a Youtube ad. The only Youtube ads, that seem to have positive effect are ones embedded in the content as a sponsor of that content, Google makes no money from these, well they need to smarten up. Buying Youtube and burying it under the billions in debt created by buying it, not that smart a move, fucked profitability right up. Youtube want to sell an ad, they have to be banner ads in prominent locations aligned with the content that invite greater interaction.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    3. Re:Part of the roadmap by fph+il+quozientatore · · Score: 1

      You know there are adblockers also for mobile browsers, right?

      --
      My first program:

      Hell Segmentation fault

    4. Re:Part of the roadmap by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2

      Scream all you want, the sad truth about online advertising is that it is cheap. Even cheaper with targeted ads... no, that doesn't mean that they magically know you need new shoes so they show you ads for shoes, it means that they can target a certain demographic with a fair accuracy. And because it is so cheap, they can afford to show their ads to tens of thousands of people if only one of them decides to buy their product.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    5. Re:Part of the roadmap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget that some skippable ads are quite long.
      I was listening to a playlist of songs on youtube, an d after the first song hit such an ad.
      Sure, it was skippable after about 30 seconds, but my hands were full such that I could not skip the ad.
      It went on for almost 9 minutes.
      3 minutes of music followed by 9 minutes of ad.
      Screw google.

    6. Re:Part of the roadmap by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      No, actually I didn't know that. I spent a few minutes trying to find one, noticed it didn't work, and then gave up. If you can point me to a working ad block (for Android) I'll give it another shot.

    7. Re:Part of the roadmap by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      it means that they can target a certain demographic with a fair accuracy

      I can say that, without exception, I only get ads for things I have never,ever, shown the slightest interest in, or ads for things that I've already bought.

    8. Re:Part of the roadmap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of the results I get/got when searching for this required rooting the device. I wasn't particularly interested in that, but I eventually found "YouTube Vanced" -- as in "advanced" minus the ADs. A root version is available, but not required.

      I prefer to do most YouTube viewing on a desktop with uBlock Origin, but for when I want to do mobile viewing Vanced works great. I don't login to my google/youtube account when using it, so can't comment about security etc. of that.

      Worth a look.

    9. Re:Part of the roadmap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been using uBlock on Firefox mobile for a good couple of years, now. If there was ever a nice thing about mobile sites, it's that they're not expecting ad blockers as much as their desktop counterpart. I've seen a handful of sites complain / prevent actions on the full desktop site, but was fine for the mobile version. Just my experience, your mileage may vary.

    10. Re:Part of the roadmap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      youtube vanced

    11. Re:Part of the roadmap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mobile Firefox + Adblock Plus seems to work fine for me. I have not tried it with videos, though.

    12. Re: Part of the roadmap by Flavianoep · · Score: 1

      Opera browser has built-in ad blocking.

      --
      Linux is for people who don't mind RTFM.
    13. Re:Part of the roadmap by RuiFRibeiro · · Score: 1

      The technology to block them is cheap too.

    14. Re:Part of the roadmap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in addition to adblocker apps and addons for mobile there are completely different Youtube front ends as well.
      I have been using Newpipe for years. For the way I use youtube it works very well. It doesn't have comments at all. I can still subscribe to a channel, but it's not tied to my google account.

    15. Re:Part of the roadmap by skaralic · · Score: 1

      Wow, talk about first world problems. If it bothers you that much to see adds while consuming free content and sucking up their bandwidth, then pay for the no-ads version or go somewhere else (like, outside).

      Just decide whether you like free shit more than you hate ads.

    16. Re:Part of the roadmap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've already stopped watching 99% of youtube on mobile because of the ads. Only when I'm really particularly interested in watching that video right now, I'll play the ad. Otherwise, I wait until I can get my laptop with adblock.

      There's NewPipe for Android: https://newpipe.schabi.org/
      Open Source Youtube app that bypasses the ads.

    17. Re:Part of the roadmap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, actually I didn't know that. I spent a few minutes trying to find one, noticed it didn't work, and then gave up. If you can point me to a working ad block (for Android) I'll give it another shot.

      I'm not the GP.
      GP probably isn't considering that most people use Google's App to watch Youtube thanks to the somewhat heavy-handed defaults that rip you out of the browsing session you so carefully prepared with ________ alternative browser and into their proprietary client (similar to how most mobile users don't really use Facebook without the app).

      Since I am hostile to google and disabled most of their stuff, I'm not sure if my solution would work. I use DNS66 (from the F-droid store). There is also a Youtube client calld Newpipe which seems to work. I don't watch youtube on mobile so take this with a grain of salt, but I don't recall seeing mid-video ads there.

    18. Re:Part of the roadmap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work for an ad network. Our algos know pretty well when you need a pair of shoes.

    19. Re:Part of the roadmap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fact is, you are an exception. Most people don't avoid brands because of adverts. And advertising generally has a positive benefit on sales. The advertisers really don't care if you as an individual never buy from them again, because the adverts likely increase overall sales.

      And Google buying Youtube didn't saddle Youtube with billions of debt, because Google actually had the money to do so, so it wasn't a shitty leveraged buyout. Yes Google would have wanted to recoup the investment at some point, but really, whoever owns it would try to milk it for all that it is worth, but it did need a company like Google to buy it because it wasn't profitable before it was bought and needed someone that could deal with the mess of copyright infringing content without being made bankrupt by inevitable copyright lawsuits against them.

      Further, if you are indeed someone who doesn't mind paying for content, just fucking well pay for Youtube Red and get the content without adverts.

    20. Re:Part of the roadmap by Eubeleus · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and even though 99% of people will get annoyed and click the shit away from the ad, even a 1% response on direct marketing, depending on what it is, can be considered MASSIVE. So yes, they can afford the ill will. I've run ad campaigns that were deliberately designed to annoy, cajole, irritate - and when people started bitching about it on social media the response rate SOARED.

  13. Obligatory "YouTube has ads?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn’t even know YouTube had ads until years after they first appeared to the general population. I'm not even kidding.
    I was shocked how people can even handle the web with ads. It's a horrifying mess of brightly colored animated blinking crap that’s worse than an east-Asian shopping street.

    I nearly had forgotten they existed, until now.
    And by the way: The ad blocker lists already support blocking back-to-back ads without changes.

    ----------

    I don't even have a problem with paying when I get something in return, if I asked for it (and there's consumer protection against being ripped off), I only have a problem with
    1. deliberately being manipulated, lied to, and subconsciously triggered, for the purpose of harming me (=getting me to ), ... aka advertisement ... and
    2. giving my hard-earned money for something that isn't worth as much as my hard work, or that took no work at all (= "intellectual property") ... If that was legitimate, I could use that same logic, to justify "paying" with a mere copy of a $100 bill, "Because I worked *hard* for that money, you seafaring rapist thugs!".

    Give me a fair micro-payment service, e.g. built into HTTP, and allowing me to install payment plug-ins in the browser, and I will gladly pay for good work. But for the *work* only! As I had to work too! Not for the *copy* of the *result* of the work! Unless I can "pay" with a copy of my result of my work (money) too!

    1. Re: Obligatory "YouTube has ads?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do they letterbox or pillarbox ads now?

    2. Re: Obligatory "YouTube has ads?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's impossible to be a freeloader on the internet. The internet was created for the FREE exchange of information and data. If you and your polluting advertising cronies don't like it, then get the fuck off of my internet, you eternal September scum.

    3. Re: Obligatory "YouTube has ads?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There's a Canadian Youtuber who goes by the screen name AvE who does product tear downs and reviews. He has a Patreon to get funding and explicitly refuses to do manufacturer donated product reviews because of potential bias. He knows manufacturers sometimes pressure reviewers into going easy on their products. Due to that, he also has an aversion to ad based revenue. He wasn't affected by YouTube "adpocalypse" too much but it did make him even more averse to having ads on his channel.

      He had them disabled but YouTube forces them to play anyway. they are the same format as his videos and will play regardless of the player being used to view videos or the adblockers used as they come from the same content servers as the CDN serving the video. Adblockers have only served to make YouTube videos even more valuable to advertisers because of that.

      On the flip side of that you have Linus Tech Tips. He does do sponsored videos and he also puts his own ads in his videos for the products. So you will get YouTube forced ads at the beginning of his videos, then his sponsor product ad, then review and at the end another ad he made and inserted into the video (his ads are part of the actual video so they stay in the video and play every time it is viewed unlike YouTube ads which cycle through different ads).

      It is getting to the point where everything being viewed on YouTube feels like an infomercial and it is majorly offputting. I can usually tolerate up to three ads, after that there is nothing I want to see that is important enough for me to watch another ad. I just leave the site entirely.

    4. Re: Obligatory "YouTube has ads?" by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If I wanted to watch ads longer than the clips between them, I could have kept my TV.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re: Obligatory "YouTube has ads?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Using Linux Firefox with only ublock origin and I've never seen an ad on an AvE video.

    6. Re: Obligatory "YouTube has ads?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a Canadian Youtuber who goes by the screen name AvE who does product tear downs and reviews. He has a Patreon to get funding and explicitly refuses to do manufacturer donated product reviews because of potential bias. He knows manufacturers sometimes pressure reviewers into going easy on their products. Due to that, he also has an aversion to ad based revenue. He wasn't affected by YouTube "adpocalypse" too much but it did make him even more averse to having ads on his channel.

      I love how he implicitly encourages his viewers to use adblockers (my setup actually does filter out all ads) and how every single video he seems to go out of his way to say something that would get the video demonetized if caught by YT reviewers.
      He has a pretty good ratio of interesting content as well.

    7. Re: Obligatory "YouTube has ads?" by f3rret · · Score: 1

      It's my network, I'm in charge of which bits land on my network.

      --
      Admit nothing. Deny Everything. Make Counter-accusations.
    8. Re: Obligatory "YouTube has ads?" by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      It's impossible to be a freeloader on the internet. The internet was created for the FREE exchange of information and data. If you and your polluting advertising cronies don't like it, then get the fuck off of my internet, you eternal September scum.

      The internet was created so that the US government could survive a major exchange of nuclear weapons with the USSR.

      Everything else is just emergent phenomena.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    9. Re: Obligatory "YouTube has ads?" by rikkards · · Score: 1

      If he really wants to get Youtube ads to stop showing he needs to spread out to doing gun videos. InRange has never setup for ad revenue sharing (like AvE they wanted to stay impartial) and even went to the point of disabling ads completely when they started removing ad sharing for gun videos.

      I used to block ads on my android tablet using x-framework and their youtube adblocker but it seems like about 6 months ago the cat and mouse game finally came to an end. They haven't updated the version for Nougat and I now have to sit through them.

    10. Re: Obligatory "YouTube has ads?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well that was stupid. Nukes put off powerful EMPs that destroy the internet and devices.

    11. Re: Obligatory "YouTube has ads?" by Killall+-9+Bash · · Score: 1

      If you want less ads, I recommend uMatrix (successor to http switchboard). Skookum as frig.

      --
      "Prediction: within 10 years, Windows will be a Linux distribution." Me, 7-6-2016
  14. In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Youtube is testing the patience of their users, which is already near its limit.

  15. Ad placement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about you either place the ad at the beginning or end of the video (or both). If it's randomly inserted in the middle of a key event, I'm going to stop watching immediately.

  16. Because the phone is with you by tepples · · Score: 1

    When you're passing the time in a grocery store waiting for your carpooling roommate to finish her shopping, it's easier to carry a phone than a laptop.

  17. Probably a Better Experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That content doesn't stream itself. Those servers have to be powered, that electricity needs to be bought, those peering agreements need to be settled. That's fine. Fewer, but longer interruptions? If you're going to push ads, I'd rather spend 10 seconds once to skip ads than have two interruptions. Sounds like a better experience.

  18. :rubs thumb against forefinger: by sheramil · · Score: 4, Funny

    I can only suppose that being forced to watch the first half of a second of an ad before skipping it counts as watching the ad in Youtube's opinion. Being forced to skip two of them doubles their ad-view count.

    "I know! We'll just compress the ads into the first half second! We could call them... blip-verts ."

    1. Re::rubs thumb against forefinger: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what will happen is they'll begin testing a timer before the skip option becomes available.... i figure it'll level out at around six seconds, and the ads will be designed to get their message out within those first few seconds or be so stupidly ridiculous or humorous that you make that conscious decision not to skip.

    2. Re::rubs thumb against forefinger: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's all about the clicks!

    3. Re::rubs thumb against forefinger: by waynemcdougall · · Score: 1

      Don't worry. That's at least 20 minutes in the future.

      --
      Recycle PCs and build a wireless community network www.hillsborough.org.nz
    4. Re::rubs thumb against forefinger: by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      "I know! We'll just compress the ads into the first half second! We could call them... blip-verts ."

      And they will BLOW YOUR MIND!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re::rubs thumb against forefinger: by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      I'd watch the BBC version twice, but the only good part of the American version was the ads. They should have just looped the intro music for 24 minutes.

    6. Re::rubs thumb against forefinger: by FalcDot · · Score: 1

      Well, forcing me to watch 5 seconds of an ad for something I'm not interested in, doesn't really help anyone.

      Use those 5 seconds to show me 10 ads that I can skip immediately and maybe one of those 10 will catch my eye, and maybe then someone might actually make some money off me.

    7. Re::rubs thumb against forefinger: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      blip-verts? You might be on to something. If you are creative enough to capture my attention with content that is half a second long, I'd be sure to remember you.

    8. Re::rubs thumb against forefinger: by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      They've had that for ages, although it's about 3 seconds rather than 6. And some advertisers ( Apple comes to mind) apparently pay more to disable the skip altogether. As if there weren't enough reasons to hate Apple already.

    9. Re::rubs thumb against forefinger: by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      "I know! We'll just compress the ads into the first half second! We could call them... blip-verts ."

      I nominate you for advertising industry messiah. Please convince them this is the greatest idea ever. Maybe some bullshit about subliminal messaging.

  19. Youtube sucks and so do you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't give in to the trolls who cite this as some improvement. I'd rather watch Twitch or some pirate website than go to YouTube.

  20. That's awesome by Gabest · · Score: 1

    I no longer have to open my eyes and reach for the phone to press skip between videos before sleep. There will be no reason!

  21. I don't even want to see one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just avoid YouTube, they lost ms already

  22. Youtube is testing me switching to Twitch you mean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck double ads.

  23. Ads on youtube!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is this thing? I have NO ads on youtube!
    It may have something to do with the roughly 50,000 names i have in my HOSTS file though...

    1. Re:Ads on youtube!? by fisted · · Score: 1

      With 50000 entries in your hosts file (why do people keep capitalizing it BTW?) your stub resolver must perform like shit. You're essentially slowing down everything that requires DNS, which these days is practically anything.

      You may want to consider dropping the fugly hack that is hosts file based "blocking" and go for a more sensible approach. Just food for thought.

  24. On a Roku by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you watch youtube on your TV thru a Roku where there are no ad blockers (that I know of), this is good news.

    (But then, slashdotters always assume everybody uses technology exactly like they do)

  25. Re:You people need to STOP BULLYING ME... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you. Whole heartedly agree.

  26. Soon it'll be like Cable TV ads... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    10 minutes of commercials every 6 minutes of programming.

  27. I mute ads by Snotnose · · Score: 1

    I really miss my DVR since cutting the cord. Muting ads is a poor second. I just tried watching the Saints game with my antenna, jeebus farukin christo what kind of idiot watches that many commercials? I didn't make it past the first quarter before finding something more productive to digest my food to.

    1. Re:I mute ads by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2

      I hear you... I haven't watched any cable in ages, though it's included in my Internet subscription and I still have the set top box. The other day I did some channel surfing. And holy crap aren't there a lot of ads? And isn't every single one a personal insult to our intelligence? I can't remember how we put up with that crap, but for the life of me I can't imagine why anyone would, these days.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    2. Re:I mute ads by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      VPN to a country with fewer ads in its football streams. Germany works for me.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  28. ADBLOCK? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    adblock?

  29. What ???? Youtube has ads ? Not so. by stooo · · Score: 3

    Youtube has ads ?
    Not on the videos I watch.
    Never saw those.

    --
    aaaaaaa
  30. oh well by bn-7bc · · Score: 1

    This of cause sucks for evryone not having youtube premiu, ( I watch a lot of content from a few creators and want to support them), personaly I nevre see ds on youtube, appart from the times scumbags include sponsor messages in the video it self. If you as me premium is wort it just for ad blocking )I watch a lot on IOS/TvOS so adblocking on youtube does not realy work

    1. Re:oh well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This of cause sucks for evryone not having youtube premiu, ( I watch a lot of content from a few creators and want to support them), personaly I nevre see ds on youtube, appart from the times scumbags include sponsor messages in the video it self. If you as me premium is wort it just for ad blocking )I watch a lot on IOS/TvOS so adblocking on youtube does not realy work

      Adblock everything, if I want to support a creator I'll buy a shirt, mug or stickers off them as I have done for Level1Techs, Nile Red, AvE, MichaelCthulhu and Tier Zoo and several others, if I really like their content I even become a patron.

      On mobile I don't use any of Google's ads and have their core services as limited as I can make them without breaking the phone, if I want to watch Youtube videos on the phone I use NewPipe from the F-Droid repos, it's open source, doesn't show any ads, allows background play, can make playlists without an account and can download videos for offline watching in any quality and format is availible from Youtube's servers.

    2. Re:oh well by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      See, that's the reason right there. If you watched on a sensible OS/Browser combo, ad blocking would work.

      But I guess you're already used to paying for stuff others get for free, so that's fine.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  31. Questionable payout by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you have sync licensing of your music on Youtube, does that mean that whenever a video containing your music is played, instead of getting payed 1/100th of a cent per stream, you're now played 2/100th of a cent per stream?

    Someone's getting rich, NOT

  32. Instant solution by GeekWithAKnife · · Score: 1


    When using the youtube app for anything I noticed a gradual increase in the occasional ads that cannot be skipped. It's like we're all fucking hamsters and the wheel keeps shrinking ever so slightly to find the "optimum" levels of BS we'll put up with. This sort of forced crap only happens in the app.

    Almost any device that can run an "app" can run a browser. I never get this sort of shit with my uBlock Origin.

    We are being fed garbage all the time and it's escalating in complexity, timing and stealth. Look at practically any "app" compared to a browser experience from the perspective of being fed ads and I don't see a lot of reason to use dedicated apps.

    Youtube's app lacks "usability features" like playing while running a different app in full screen mode. I can put whatever on a browser and it will happily play along. In the app if I switch then it stops. This "feature" is designed to make sure there's a higher likelihood you'll be paying attention & watching ads.

    Some of it is a bit crazy if you look at more apps. For instance; youtube is free. The Financial Times is a paid-for service (not cheap). FT have an app that gathers data on you and gives you ads. Is this how you treat a paying customer? WTF? -uninstalled.

    Long story short as many of us know - If you can, avoid the app, use a browser and an ad-blocker.

    --
    A 'singular oddity' is an event that cannot be explained and only happens when you are alone.
  33. Re:Well... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    You develop a better mouse trap, we develop a better mouse... it's not like this would be the first time.

    I'd really love me a new challenge, recently it seems they stopped trying. Splicing ads into the stream sure would be something new to tackle, looking forward to it!

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  34. You don't get it, do you? by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Try, just TRY please, to get into the mindset of your user. He browses your videos or, better, he looks at his front page and sees a new video from his favorite YouTuber. Hey, great, the day just got better, a new video from HIM/HER and I get to watch it.

    He clicks.

    And is greeted by an ad.

    Let's ponder for a moment what we have here now. We have someone whose mind is expecting and looking forward to seeing a video that he really, really wants to see. This ad could now be the most on-topic ad you could possibly imagine, it could be for the cure of his incurable brain tumor and he would cuss and curse for as long as he has to watch it before he can skip it. It could be the trailer for his favorite movie franchise that he has been watching religiously since birth. It does not matter.

    It is NOT what he wants NOW.

    And yes, that's worse than it was on cable. On cable, you knew that at 6:30pm your show starts. You knew that days in advance. Because that's how it always is. Watching an ad before does not change that. Your expectation is not disappointed because there was no immediate "want it now" motivation for you. Seeing a new video being offered IS such a moment. It's surprising (more or less), it's new and exciting and you want it NOW.

    Before anyone goes "waaah, entitled crybaby can't wait..." YES. That is how people are. People are looking forward to something and anything standing between them and that something will be pushed out of the way. Especially if it's nothing they give half a fuck about like an ad.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:You don't get it, do you? by rnturn · · Score: 1

      ``And yes, that's worse than it was on cable. On cable, you knew that at 6:30pm your show starts.''

      We haven't subscribed to cable since the early '90s. The model back then was: Cable->No Commercials. None. Nada. Oh HBO might have had the occasional promo for this month's ``Elton John -- In Concert'' (which was aired pretty much every month at the time) but there were no commercials at all back then.

      The closest thing we have to cable now is the free internet programming that we can receive on our semi-smart TV. Of course, Netflix is always available if we want to pay for that. (We don't.) Yeah, there are annoying commercials on the ``free'' content. Pretty sad that one needs to see commercials while watching Will Wheaton play role-playing games, other folks playing Minecraft, or videos of people falling down but `monetization' rules. (Just kidding. We skip past those channels as soon as we realize what's on. Some evening I'll sit down and delete those from the channel list.)

      --
      CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
    2. Re:You don't get it, do you? by skaralic · · Score: 1

      Try, just TRY please, to get into the mindset of your freeloading leech that is consuming your bandwidth and using your tech while expecting to pay absolutely nothing for it

      FTFY. I hate ads too but I don't want to pay for no ads so I'm stuck with them because free shit.

    3. Re:You don't get it, do you? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Once they stop selling my data, they can get back on that high horse again.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:You don't get it, do you? by skaralic · · Score: 1

      Once they stop selling my data, they can get back on that high horse again.

      It is perfectly clear that you are trading your data and time (watching ads) in exchange for free content and that you are doing this voluntarily.

      So, just stop. I would love to see some kind of alternate platform and model take off.

    5. Re:You don't get it, do you? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Why? I'm happy with this model.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  35. old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    at least several months old. I stopped paying attention

  36. don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have adblock

  37. If you don't understand HTTP, shut up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're too stupid to configure your HTTP server to only give out information if the cost (or price, if you're a profit leech) for it was paid, and you leave it in the open, sending data to literally anyone who sends it a GET, then don't come crying to us. YOU. CHOSE. DELIBETARDELY. to have your server hand out freebies.

    We are under no obligation, to GET any other files, just because you put a URL to it in that first file. Let alone render them.

    Also, the ONLY point of ads, is to do what is equivalent to stealing our money: To make profit... from us. To be a leech on society. The core of "modern capitalism".

    Go print out some more of you your e-mails, and then get the fuck out of our Internet, digital invader.

  38. Yep, more ads in a language I don't understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YouTube (and many other sites actually) are constantly serving me ads in languages I don't understand, even though I'm looking at content in English, using English search phrases, and have English selected in my language preferences for the OS, the browser, and my login for the site. (Lately podcasts I download have had non-English ads as well even though the podcast is entirely in English)

    If they can't even figure this out then I have no idea what they think more ads is going to do. I still won't understand anything in the ads anyway.

  39. Bye bye Youtube by Harry_Bawls · · Score: 0

    I'm sick to death of all the goddamn advertising. Ruins everything.

  40. 40% by Luthair · · Score: 1

    Shouldn't there be half as many ad breaks? 40% sounds like they're going to run more ads in addition to doubling them up.

  41. Adblock Plus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FTW...

  42. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YouTubers who actually have a brain are doing this already with ad partnerships they've made themselves. The platform itself isn't, though.

  43. Subscriptions are their real revenue model! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After buying a subscription to Youtube Premium, it just dawned on me that this is their revenue model. Online ads don't really pay enough but if you make the ads annoying enough, you can encourage people to pay money for a subscription!

  44. Re:What ???? Youtube has ads ? Not so. by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2

    It's funny, I never see ads on YouTube either, unless I'm using someone else's browser, and I'm not blocking them.

    Perhaps YouTube has figured out that it's just not worth showing ads to some people?

  45. As anyone clicked on any of those ads ever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean I did by mistake.. but never intentionally... who still thinks publicity really works?
    I mean you have to put your product out there... but when I do some youtubing I will see the same exact publicity 20 times.... thats only making me angry and not want to buy THAT product so.... having more publicity is not the answer... you need to have more diversity and not play the same add to the same people twice in a WEEK

  46. Re:What ???? Youtube has ads ? Not so. by Greyfox · · Score: 1

    Yeah, every time I browse the internet on someone else's computer I realize how much the internet would suck without uBlock origin. Then again, I'd probably spend almost no time on the computer outside work if I weren't using an ad blocker, so I suppose that sword cuts both ways.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  47. Youtube lameness and You Lose. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You think you hate Youtube now? Wait until you meet a great content developer that you would buy products from that are related towha you are watching on Youtube but the content developer has been prejudiced bybYoutube sobthat nnone make money and the Youtube video viewer only suffers when the video creater inline inserts it's own sales advertisement into the video sobnow you wait for Youtube to play a Ad and then the actual Youtube video is an ad before youee wat you want to see and then another inline video ad from the content developer or creater whichever an then halfway through the video is another Youtube advertisement. Do tou get my point? Yes, your video can be as much as 2/3rds advertisements at the minimum.

    Hi, i am High Impact Flix who had to restate my account as High Impact Vlogs. Youtibe truly is a bad word when it comes to imteroperation. Adverttisemsnt space that would earn Youtube more money is eaten upby croney capitalist companies instead.

  48. Early bird special by Waccoon · · Score: 1

    So they just want to show more ads up-front before we get any content. That sounds like it will end well.

    I've already unsubbed from several channels that got into the "two minutes of endorsements, begging for likes and subs, and Patreon, but hey, you can just skip it if you don't like it, so it's okay".

  49. There is such an obvious solution. by Static · · Score: 1

    And a few have mentioned it. Yes, it is paying for Youtube Premium.

    Originally, I signed up to explicitly get rid of the ads. But almost immediately I got offered the Youtube Music app and I love it. And I didn't have to teach it what music I liked because it already knew as I'd been Liking the music videos I love for years. Subtle advantage over other music services: Youtube usually has the music video, too. :)

  50. TV vs YT ads by jelabarre · · Score: 1

    One thing people are missing regarding YouTube inserting ads in the middle of videos, when they try to compare it to broadcast TV.

    When you watched a show on TV, and they were inserting ads in the middle, those shows would be edited with the expectation that there would be commercial breaks, and the layout of the show would account for them. On YouTube, they'll break in with a commercial whenever they feel like it. Doesn't matter if you're watching a musical performance, technical presentation, whatever. The person in the video could be in mid-sentence, mid-phrase, and YT/Google will jump in and say "fuck what you were watching, here's an ad".

    You know, for the most part I was willing to tolerate reasonable advertising on YT, because I realize someone has to pay for keeping the servers running. I have some clue of the economics of it. But when they start breaking into the MIDDLE of videos, at illogical and inappropriate places, then it prompts me to find a way to block ALL advertising on YT, even the ones I was willing to tolerate. Fuck 'em.

    Not to mention that now they *INSIST* upon placing thumbnails of other videos on TOP of the video even before it's done playing. Seriously? Perhaps there was something at the end of that video we wanted to see. And their jackass thumbnails ruin the viewing experience. When I complained on their so-called "support" forums, some mealy-mouthed GoogleTwit(TM) said "oh, people are supposed to add extra space at the end of the video..." Really? I don't think so. Google would like to pass off the blame to OTHERS for their own bullshit mistakes. No concept of usage cases, no thought that when they *change* their shit code, it breaks things that worked before. They expect people to have to constantly revisit everything just in case Google fucked up yet something ELSE in the interim. Can't even own up to their own fuckups (then again, there are SO many of them, it must be impossible to keep track).

    Sad state that the ONLY thing Google seem capable of developing without royally fucking it up is advertising. Everything else they make may turn to shit (or just outright start out as shit from the get-go), but boy can they serve ads.