Slashdot Mirror


US Asks Foreign Allies To Avoid Huawei (cnet.com)

The US government is reportedly trying to persuade its foreign allies' wireless and internet providers to avoid Huawei equipment. From a report: Officials have spoken to their counterparts and telecom bosses in Germany, Italy, Japan and other friendly countries where the Chinese company's equipment is already in use, the Wall Street Journal reported, citing unnamed sources. The US is reportedly particularly worried about the use of Huawei equipment in countries with American military bases, since most nonsensitive communication travels via commercial networks, and it's concerned about Chinese meddling.

185 comments

  1. So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You can't buy this kind of premium advertising.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    1. Re:So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by Freischutz · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You can't buy this kind of premium advertising.

      I've had a couple of Huawei's 4G usb/wifi connectors. Thus far they have turned both turned out to be a complete and utter pile of crap so the US Govt. is preaching to the converted as far as I am concerned since I am already avoiding Huawei products like the bubonic plague.

    2. Re:So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 0

      Even if we assume that the Chinese have a backdoor into that equipment, it's better than the NSA/GCHQ having a backdoor into it.

      Also what is the alternative? Cisco? We know their gear is full of intentional backdoors even before the NSA ones are found.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by Zocalo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Depends where the hardware is in your infrastructure and your levels of paranoia/security requirements. A lot of my clients run high-value networks (national infrastructure, etc.) and most are now moving towards dual-vendor perimeter firewall solutions, creating a physical DMZ in between, not the virtual ones you get by applying rules to traffic passing between internal different ports on the same firewall.

      One vendor is typically from a Five Eyes country (there's only so many options for this kind of hardware), and the other absolutely will not be - internal firewalls may also be deployed. Rulesets on both with be default deny, and both will be actively monitored for suspicious traffic coming from the other as part of the standard IDS/IPS setup. Even if both are backdoored on behalf of their manufacturer's governments, it's going to be very hard for either country's security services to get into the network through both firewalls, or to successfully exfiltrate data from a compromised box on the inside.

      Well, that's the theory at least. If one or both know about the other's backdoors (which is why this is such a terrible idea in the first place, because sooner or later they probably will) then all bets are off.

      --
      UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    4. Re:So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by mark-t · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Even if we assume that the Chinese have a backdoor into that equipment, it's better than the NSA/GCHQ having a backdoor into it.

      Explain this reasoning.... how is a foreign backdoor preferable to a domestic one?

    5. Re:So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      the foreign entities are outside of your jurisdiction

    6. Re:So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Explain this reasoning.... how is a foreign backdoor preferable to a domestic one?

      On behalf of everyone not in the UK or the US .. it's all fucking foreign spying.

      The difference is we no longer trust the US or give a fuck about your security, because America are now officially assholes.

      Thank Trump for this, but many of us are now pretty much going to do the opposite of what the US asks, because your security and prosperity no longer matter to us.

      Yes, you can take this as "fuck off America".

    7. Re:So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by mark-t · · Score: 1, Insightful

      And how is that actually a preferable thing, when we are still talking about invading people's privacy?

    8. Re:So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by mark-t · · Score: 1

      I never meant to suggest that American spying should somehow be preferable. Obviously the ideal is no backdoors, but the post to which I responded *explicitly* made the assumption that the foreign phone would have a backdoor, and I was wondering why *THAT* would still somehow be preferred.

    9. Re:So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by fazig · · Score: 1

      Let me use this hyperbole here.
      What does you scare more? Hearing from some devastating natural disaster that's happening on the other side of the world. Or hearing from a devastating natural disaster that happening inside your country is headed your way?
      Now I don't know how you would answer that question. But a lot of people would probably be more concerned when something like that goes down in their neighbourhood. Things that happen in your vicinity are a more immediate concern to most people.

      Conversely we assume that if a foreign Government is spying on you - a civilian - who doesn't live in their jurisdiction can't be affected by their spying as much as badly as from your local authorities. And of course we also assume that these foreign governments do not share their intelligence with our own governments. Which of course is in no way certain. Of course if you're an employee working in sensitive areas, maybe concerning national security or involving things like trade secrets this may be a different issue.

      Now this doesn't make being spied on by a foreign government a good thing. And these arguments reek of whataboutism. We ought to prefer nobody spying on us and ought to avoid any device that is suspicious in this way. But I hope this helps to understand why some people would rather let a foreign government spy on them than their domestic government.

    10. Re:So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by mermeid007 · · Score: 1

      Always Huawei. Is Huawei the only telecom device company in the known universe that they deserve this level of attention?

    11. Re:So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Except that backdoor is still in *YOUR* phone.... so all you've done by choosing a foreign device is brought the foreign "disaster" into your own neighborhood as well anyways.

    12. Re:So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Domestic spies can make my life much worse than ones who have no jurisdiction.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    13. Re:So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Even if we assume that the Chinese have a backdoor into that equipment, it's better than the NSA/GCHQ having a backdoor into it.

      Yep. Unless you're a company who competes directly with Chinese imports or something.

      For home use? Chinese all the way!

      --
      No sig today...
    14. Re:So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by Joce640k · · Score: 2

      Explain this reasoning.... how is a foreign backdoor preferable to a domestic one?

      The Chinese government isn't going to try to arrest a US citizen in his own home, put them on a no-fly list because they read the Koran once, or whatever.

      --
      No sig today...
    15. Re:So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be dense.

      What is Beijing going to do with your private information? Are they going to frame you, arrest you, and throw you in a gulag in America? Of course not.

      One government controls your life, the other doesn't.

    16. Re:So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by invictusvoyd · · Score: 1

      Open hardware .. "join us now and share the hardware.."

    17. Re:So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      What will the Chinese secret service do if I google the wrong topics?

      And now, what will the NSA do?

      And which of the two do you think will have more impact on my quality of life?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    18. Re:So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dammit! I've been trying to get (hold of) the bubonic plague for some time.
      Where are you avoiding it so I can get me some (lemme know in the comments' section).

      CAP === 'parlor'

    19. Re:So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      Well, probably the only one that fails to grease the right palms.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    20. Re: So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Chinese will blackmail you into doing their bidding.

    21. Re:So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Soooo much drama!!

    22. Re:So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Im pretty sure a certain american phone that has been bumped down by Huawei worldwide has been bribing the government big time to make this happen.

    23. Re: So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rubbish. Your own government would do that first, having the rest of the pieces of the puzzle that is your life, whereas the Chinese haven't a clue.

    24. Re:So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Even if we assume that the Chinese have a backdoor into that equipment, it's better than the NSA/GCHQ having a backdoor into it"

      I think the US government is as fucked as the next slashdot libertarian tech bro, but you're fucking cracked mate.

    25. Re:So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Or you just go with a different vendor like Palo Alto or Sonicwall which thus far have not been subject to these problems. Dual vendor firewall solutions are a nightmare scenario. Most companies can barely manage one firewall product much less a second product from an entirely different vendor.

      This is why you deployed HIDS as well as NIDS and use a proper SIEM to alert you if any configurations are modified. NIDS will also find any hidden communications from your hypothetical supermicro server sending info back to China. It is a solved problem with a way simpler solution their you're proposing which would be a network disaster.

      Internal firewalls are commonly deployed to keep workstations separate from servers because users really can't be trusted. Servers separated from different trust level servers is easily accomplished by using private vlans either in community mode or isolation mode depending on your level of paranoia. People that don't know better will often deploy additional firewalling between trust levels for servers but again, with HIDS and NIDS propery deployed it just adds needless complexity and probably makes your network perform like crap.

    26. Re:So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sell it to people who *could* harm you, perhaps?

    27. Re:So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Please explain how, exactly, a backdoor that is usable by the chinese could not also be usable by the NSA.

      Leaks happen. Hacks happen. Backdoors are inevitably found, with enough time.

    28. Re:So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by larryjoe · · Score: 1

      Even if we assume that the Chinese have a backdoor into that equipment, it's better than the NSA/GCHQ having a backdoor into it.

      Explain this reasoning.... how is a foreign backdoor preferable to a domestic one?

      Furthermore, if you're the Germans, who do you trust the least, the Americans or the Chinese? The Germans already have over 30,000 US soldiers on its soil that it willing supports. Would the Germans be willing to do that with the Chinese? The US has been outed spying on Germans, including Merkel herself, and yet Merkel has still emphasized the importance of future US-German intelligence cooperation. Would the Germans have that same attitude toward the Chinese?

      And this is only considering political and military implications. I assume that the Germans are just as concerned as the Americans about Chinese industrial espionage.

    29. Re: So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by reanjr · · Score: 1

      How is it better? While legally speaking it's better I suppose, it seems to me I'd rather have my data abused to serve American interests rather than Chinese.

    30. Re: So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It really depends on your business which is better.
      Certainly if you compete with chinese companies.

    31. Re:So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by fazig · · Score: 1

      Yes, a backdoor is in your phone. Which in itself is a risk that ought to concern you, since it could be exploited by others as well. However that wasn't exactly the point of your question.
      You don't bring the foreign "disaster" to your neighbourhood as you don't grant them jurisdiction over you or your neighbourhood just by owning a device that was compromised by them. So unless you plan to go to China yourself or some other place that puts you within the reach of Chinese authorities, what can they do to you? Blackmail?
      Now think about what local authorities could do to you if they have some dirt on you. Then compare the two. On top of blackmail the latter can incarcerate you without issues, get a search warrant for your house and worse.

      (Playing devil's advocate) that is the reasoning that I can see, despite the whole thing being a false dichotomy to begin with.

    32. Re:So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If you're a US citizen, the NSA can snatch you out the stree, the Chinese government can't.
      Boom.

    33. Re:So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Germany already made its choice after Trump withdrew from the Paris agreement. China is their future. Fuck America, fuck Trump.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    34. Re: So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm I've never shared a backdoors before. Usually there's only room for one person to enter. If I propose sharing the backdoors with my wife she might divorce me. Any tips on approaching my wife about sharing the back door?

    35. Re:So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by Freischutz · · Score: 1

      Dammit! I've been trying to get (hold of) the bubonic plague for some time. Where are you avoiding it so I can get me some (lemme know in the comments' section).

      CAP === 'parlor'

      Over 80% of United States plague cases have been bubonic plague: https://www.cdc.gov/plague/map... ... now have fun with it.

    36. Re:So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 2

      You are more boring to a distant adversary who has a very weak relationship with you, compared to a nearby adversary who both rules over you and is also ruled by you. (e.g. The Austrialian government has more reason to fuck with Australians than the Austrian government does. And the Austrian government has more reason to fuck with Austrians than Australians.)

      --
      "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
    37. Re: So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by sound+vision · · Score: 1

      It's not so much that they won't cooperate. They are still providing services for American military bases, which are built (with permission usually) on foreign soil to begin with. What they are saying now is that they won't rebuild their *entire* infrastructure for the US military. If their goal is to be independent or even neutral, the goalposts are already in the wrong place.

      They might get a miniscule PR bump from not going along with this backbone upgrade idea. We know Apple's shills still hammer on them not unlocking the San Bernardino terrorists' phones as an example of Apple's commitment to privacy. But whereas Apple's success is based heavily on branding, artificial market segmentation, PR shennanigans... Those things are way less important to whatever European ISP is in question. Not unimportant - but also not their bread and butter.

    38. Re:So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bit late for the 5th Eye, Nude Zooland. Hugest building in Auckland CBD is smegged over with a red sign: Huawei. ALL the optical cable and routers down the the in-home boxes - with our "ultrafast" broadband for everyone rollout - are 100% Huawei. Owned man, owned - and too dumb to know it.

    39. Re: So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Patriotism is my opening my anus to the FBI and NSA for the good of my neighbors...

      No thanks...if my neighbors had any ethics they would be running some build their spy agencies couldn't tap into also.

    40. Re:So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by mark-t · · Score: 1

      But owing to the inherent insecurities that backdoors of *ANY* kind can cause, any backdoor that is usable by the chinese could be invaded upon by the NSA anyways, either because of leaks, or simply as the result of a successul hacking effort, etc.

      There is no objectively justifiable rationale for preferring a foreign backdoor to a domestic one, and in some ways it could be worse in that it may impact your ability to travel as well.

      The only justifiable reason I can see for thinking it is somehow better is based on a complete inverse reasoning of the expression "better the devil you know than one you don't", and actually preferring to have to deal with potentially unknown problems instead of ones that might somehow be in your purview, which seems entirely backwards to me.

      Obviously the ideal is that there are no backdoors at all, but the post to which I responded suggested that a foreign one would somehow be preferable, comes across as irrational and reactionary to the mere existence of domestic backdoors rather than being based on a coherent and sound argument.

    41. Re: So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by sound+vision · · Score: 2

      The "nightmare scenario" is that all the available hardware is riddled with backdoors - and we are already in this scenario.

      If your network is important enough, and you don't have the resources to build your own equipment from the ground-up, layering is the only way to mitigate these hardware backdoors. You won't close them, oh no... But now an attacker needs to get through 2 doors instead of 1.

    42. Re:So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      I agree that backdoors via either side aren't good. But I'd argue that China having a backdoor into your network is far worse. Why? Economic and Industrial espionage. The US Gov't isn't really in the business of spying for industrial espionage purposes. Yes, it has happened in the past and I suspect it will happen in the future, but China is HEAVILY involved. That's one of the pitfalls of state owned businesses. There is a serious incentive for their government to blur the lines between national spying and competitive spying.

      Unless you are some business with strong national security implications the odds that the US Government is going to spy on you to steal your latest wifi design is... unlikely. China has a much stronger incentive to spy on you for purposes like that..

    43. Re:So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if only they made decent products. they are the fucking poster child for cheap, insecure, poorly supported, made in china crap.

    44. Re: So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes the Germans sure are in a hurry to close their BMW factories in the US....

    45. Re:So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if we assume that the Chinese have a backdoor into that equipment, it's better than the NSA/GCHQ having a backdoor into it.

      Explain this reasoning.... how is a foreign backdoor preferable to a domestic one?

      It assumes that the (US) government won't attack and weaken (US) companies. It also assumes that the (US) manufacturers are not as much under the thumb of the (US) government as foreign ones.

      Both of these assumption have been more and less valid at various periods in the past.

      However, I would generally rate the independence of US companies from the US government higher than the Chinese equivalents.

    46. Re:So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by William+Baric · · Score: 1

      Because the Chinese government can't use any information it has on me against me. The Chinese government can't arrest me for wrongthink. That's why a foreign backdoor is preferable to a domestic one.

    47. Re:So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Foreign entities are not likely to be setting you up for prosecution. NSA/Government has proven in the past they are happy to steal secrets and IP and monitor all your information and communication. The real question is how can any foreign government be worse?

    48. Re:So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Well, considering that all that crap is made in China anyway, it essentially means that the NSA has to jump over one more hurdle to get to my data. China has it anyway.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    49. Re:So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If backdoors in Huawei phones were useful to the NSA, why does the U.S. government want to stop people from buying them?

      All this brouhaha about Huawei phones seems to suggest that whatever backdoors they have, the NSA can't figure out how to utilize them and the Chinese isn't sharing any data collected through them, so they're telling people not to buy them out of a fit of jealousy.

    50. Re:So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      If you live in America, come to the Western states and go look for prairie dogs during the summer. If you see dead ones located about 100' or more away from the colony, then you have found it.
      Otherwise, you can go to any undeveloped nation and find it in various mammals.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    51. Re:So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      juno.
      Your own locally made switches and routers.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    52. Re:So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Crimson Tsunami/Caffeinated Bacon, You continue to lie and push Americans to be traitors to their nation. You just don't get it.
      Of course, by some of the other postings, it looks like Xi is giving it to you.

    53. Re:So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Here. Watch this, esp. the end where they Chinese spy gets incriminating evidence on an America so that he can FORCE him to spy for him.
      China and Russia do this heavily. And if you think that a foreign backdoor is preferable to a domestic one, then you have NO clue of what is going on in the world. At times, I wish that ppl like you could see/hear some of what goes on. You would understand that in general there is a real reason why the western nations, along with Japan/S. Korea, are banded together and deals with the same groups the same way.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    54. Re:So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Assuming they are backdoored by the chinese government, people would still be handing over information gratis to them, and China is, at the end of the day, considered a competitor to the USA.

    55. Re:So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can we take that as you work for either China or Russia?

    56. Re:So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      No. The Chinese gov WILL blackmail an American and turn them to traitors IFF they have hard evidence of your being a criminal. After all, if you steal from one group, you can steal for china just as easily so that the evidence is not turned over to the American gov. Of course, then they have you for the original crime (which the American gov may/may not have cared about), along with your then turning traitor to the American ppl.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    57. Re:So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      'wrong topics'???? Perhaps you mean pulling up Child pornography? OR, you are searching how to murder trump or connect with AQ? Because otherwise, the American gov does not care. In fact, unless they have a warrant, they can not do anything.
      OTOH, The Chinese gov can and WILL use that evidence against you to turn you against America. For example, if they can get evidence that makes it look like you committed murder of some scientists, they might fabricate a bit more and then approach you and blackmail you with it.
      And if you think that the American gov is worse, then by all means, show us the evidence of such.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    58. Re:So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      NSA can and does use them but they do not want this to be useful to the Chinese as well.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    59. Re:So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Paris, like Kyoto, is a joke. Even your nation is breaking it.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    60. Re:So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      LOL.
      The NSA can not touch a single American. They are NOT allowed to do that. And Chinese gov. DOES grab ppl from foreign soils. So does America, but China/Russia do it far far more.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    61. Re:So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      the NSA is NOT about stealing secrets/IP/etc. However, they DO listen in to various spies, business/gov heads and have caught dirty deal going down, such as when Airbus did million dollar bribes to middles eastern gov. The NSA WAS listening to those gov officials and caught them taking the bribes. Later on, IP was being sold to Russia/China by European employees when NSA was listening to the Russian/Chinese. In fact, over and over, we see that NSA catches ppl selling IP/ state secrets/etc to foreign advisaries. Show me a case where NSA listened in on European Business-> European Business or other national business and we captured IP from them? It has NEVER happened.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    62. Re:So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You would understand that in general there is a real reason why the western nations, along with Japan/S. Korea, are banded together and deals with the same groups the same way.

      Of course. The reason is simple. They are on top, and have all the money. They prefer to keep it that way.

    63. Re:So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the NSA has my patent applications, whoop-de-do. If China does, they will copy the info, patent it, then some shell corporation in a US court will sue me for making my own stuff.

    64. Re:So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit. Blackmail and extortion are pretty common today. Come a recession, those offshore spies will be more than happy to collaberate with gangbangers to know when to do robberies or home invasions.

      You remind me of the stupid CEO who says that security doesn't make money so why bother. You don't care about security... but you will when the economy goes into free-fall, and you wonder why all the jobs are overseas, with any patent you make mysteriously appearing in Hong Kong a week before you filed it, and they suing you for your own invention.

    65. Re:So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about all the suspicious bids the Americans win after being given details of the other countries secret negotiations.
      Are you really that naive, or just pretending to be?

    66. Re:So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      sure. what bids? Back up what you are saying with proof.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    67. Re:So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      and China is, at the end of the day, considered a competitor to the USA.

      Maybe by Trump supporters. Outside of America there is no contest.

      America is not even in the running. If you want Quality, you buy European or Japanese. If you want cheap, you buy Chinese. Nobody buys American.

      A quick trip round my house:

      European products: 50%
      Chinese products: 30%
      Japanese products: 10%
      Unidentifiable/Korean/other: 10%

      American products: 0%
      Obviously, I live in Europe.

      Looking in the streets outside, almost everything is European. Nothing is American. Links on my browser home screen: about 5% American, 0% Chinese - but then I can't actually read Chinese.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    68. Re:So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      King of lies only believes what he wants to believe, facts are meaningless to him.

    69. Re:So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China is wrong to spy but the US is the worse violator of privacy rights in the world. (see NSA). Hypocrisy much?

    70. Re:So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You probably believe journalist Jamal Khashoggi wasn't killed in the Saudi consulate in Turkey. You haven't seen any proof have you?

      He probably just tripped walking down the stairs and accidentally cut himself up into tiny little pieces with a bone saw he just happened to be carrying.

    71. Re:So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know telling everyone CIA tactics amounts to treason don't you? Why do you hate America?

    72. Re: So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so, like, facebook and the other stoopid 'merkin social dise^H^H^H^Hnetworks.

    73. Re:So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Yes, a backdoor is in your phone. Which in itself is a risk that ought to concern you, since it could be exploited by others as well. However that wasn't exactly the point of your question.

      Actually, that was *exactly* the point of my question. For the same reason that any backdoor that might be intended only for use by legitimate law enforcement would certainly be exploited by nefarious individuals as well, whether because of the almost inevitable leaks or through hacking efforts or what you, any backdoor that might exist in a Chinese phone would be exposing you to the exact same risks... plus, because you would further be basically giving the Chinese your private information gratis, you are compounding any of the vulnerabilities you otherwise have with any domestic backdoor, potentially limiting your ability to travel as well.

    74. Re:So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by fazig · · Score: 1

      I mean, I do agree on you. At least as far as all those security concerns go. Having a backdoor of any kind in your device is dodgy at best.
      But I think your reasoning appears to rely on the premise that a backdoor planted by the Chinese government is inherently less secure than a backdoor planted by authorities like the NSA. And therefore the Chinese backdoor would be more prone to exploitation, which then outweighs the dangers that may come from surveillances by a local authority. Feel free to correct and or add something here.
      Maybe that is true. Maybe not. I'm not in a position to make assumption about the competence of China's cyberwarfare. I just can see why at least some people are more concerned by spying from people who can directly affect them than those that are far far away.

    75. Re:So they won't cooperate with the NSA? by mark-t · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't suggest that it is any less secure, but I think it's unlikely to be more secure... and so would be vulnerable to nefarious entities exactly as any domestic backdoor would be.

      Further, all other things equal, the NSA I believe is more likely to be fairer even to those it may persecute than the Chinese government would be. I realize that the Chinese government is far away and not able to significantly impact you or I right now, but I feel that when something wrong is happening, wanting to ignore it, or worse, endorse or somehow prefer it, simply because the really bad stuff isn't in one's own backyard is not really ethically justifiable, nor even an ultimately sustainable position.

      I'm reminded of a well known poem, written, I think, in the 1950's:

      First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out - Because I was not a socialist.

      Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out - Because I was not a trade unionist.

      Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out - Because I was not a Jew.

      Then they came for me - and there was no one left to speak for me.

  2. Of course! by gweihir · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If people use Huawei, the NSA-Backdoors (e.g. Cisco) are not present! They cannot have that...

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    1. Re:Of course! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If people use Huawei, the NSA-Backdoors (e.g. Cisco) are not present! They cannot have that...

      No, if the Chinese have a backdoor into Huawei phones, you can assume that the NSA has found it and is piggybacking on it. Don't assume that just because the Chinese compromised a model, that it's not being listened to by the NSA.

    2. Re:Of course! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If that were true the NSA wouldn't have a problem with people buying Huawei phones.

      The fact they're discouraging people from buying Huawei phones shows that the NSA has no fucking clue how to use those backdoors.

      They're mad with jealousy and this is the best solution they can come up with -- a forced boycott within a capitalist "free market".

    3. Re:Of course! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That NSA isn't omnipotent, and the Chinese have some very competent people working for them. Don't assume that the NSA will necessarily be able to use any backdoors that the Chinese government may or may not have put in to their devices.

  3. Backdoor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    USA asks countries to only use NSA backdoored equipment.

    1. Re:Backdoor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those are legislated management ports, I tell you!

  4. Why? by lennier1 · · Score: 2

    For most users the difference between American or Chinese backdoors in their hardware means jack shit!

    1. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is about Carrier-grade equipment, not consumer grade. So the issue is not about a few customers, but the entire mobile traffic over Huawei equipped networks as well as location based information of a country's entire population, given the nature of radio transmission, assuming 100% of coverage.

  5. Real Reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This equipment does not have the preferred NSA back doors installed and takes too long to decrypt.

  6. Cool I'm safe by grumpy-cowboy · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm from Canada and I use a Google Pixel phone. My privacy is protected!

    --
    Will $CURRENT_YEAR be the year of the Linux Desktop?
    1. Re:Cool I'm safe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Poe's law in full effect.

    2. Re:Cool I'm safe by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 0

      Slashdot, please disable code/monotype tags.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    3. Re:Cool I'm safe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People do post code here occasionally.

      Just downmod into oblivion any primadonna who confuses the tags for it with vanity plates.

    4. Re:Cool I'm safe by Fly+Swatter · · Score: 1

      Some forums have an actual [sarcasm] font, this is as close as we can get. I think they should be used more often, just for you.

    5. Re:Cool I'm safe by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2

      I did not miss the sarcasm, but I think this is abusing the code/monotype tag. As AC said above, I see it as "vanity plates" for comments, i.e. "look at me, I'm different!"

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    6. Re: Cool I'm safe by sound+vision · · Score: 1

      They posted code here occasionally 10 years ago. Now, you're lucky if you can even find a real 15 year old to argue with... most trolls are just here to collect a paycheck nowadays.

    7. Re:Cool I'm safe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's wrong with suffixing your comment with a "/s" or "/sarcasm" or place it in "<sarcasm></sarcasm>" tags?

      Or even better yet, just make your sacasm clear and don't use tags at all.

      There is no need for fancy fonts to indicate sarcasm. The code tags on the other hand are actually useful when you need to have something displayed in a monospaced font, maybe what is actually needed is a mod option to downmod comments that misuse it.

  7. ship CAPTCHA: intercom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anything the chinese can do with Hauwei they can do with google apps.

  8. I have one by houghi · · Score: 1

    I have a Huawei phone, so does this moean the NSA can't read my data? Bummer.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  9. Bullshit ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    US Asks Foreign Allies To Avoid Huawei

    This is complete and utter bullshit, because Trump has decided America has no foreign allies.

    Tell you what, we don't care what the US says any more, so stop trying to dictate to us and fuck off.

    Signed, everybody-but-America-first because we don't give a fuck about what you want.

    Allies my fucking ass, Trump has pretty much stated there is no such thing. And, no, we're not just going to forgive and forget this time.

  10. The Chinese are not the good guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Even if we assume that the Chinese have a backdoor into that equipment, it's better than the NSA/GCHQ having a backdoor into it.

    I really have to point this out: the Chinese government are really NOT the good guys.

    Yeah, the slashdot echo chamber says over and over "NSA bad!", but, really, learn something about what the Chinese government is doing to see some serious repression.

    1. Re:The Chinese are not the good guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sure, but if you live in the USA, the Chinese aren't the ones who can put you in jail.

    2. Re:The Chinese are not the good guys by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the slashdot echo chamber says over and over "NSA bad!", but, really, learn something about what the Chinese government is doing to see some serious repression.

      They're not doing it to me or anybody I know. The NSA/GCHQ just might.

      --
      No sig today...
    3. Re:The Chinese are not the good guys by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      Yes, the Chinese government is a million times worse than the US one. The story about getting an automatic ticket when crossing the road while the traffic light shows red because their CCTV with facial recognition is linked to their passport database alone is creepy to say the least.

      And a swine flu pandemic in Asia certainly is more critical than a common flu over here. Yet I'd be more concerned of getting the common flu over here because I rarely travel to Asia. And I'm more concerned about an agency that at least has some chance to have an impact on my life over one that almost certainly has none.

      Even aside of the whataboutism in your complaint, this is simple risk assessment. Even a risk that is mission crippling may be ignored if it cannot strike, while you have to take one that has a lower impact into account if it can.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:The Chinese are not the good guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      G. Bush allowed (this is well documented, BTW) allowed the
      Chinese to assassinate a dissonant reporter on U.S. soil.
      Don't piss of the Chinese or the Saudis 'cause the U.S. of A.
      won't defend you.

      CAP === 'backside'

    5. Re:The Chinese are not the good guys by XXongo · · Score: 2

      G. Bush allowed (this is well documented, BTW) allowed the Chinese to assassinate a dissonant reporter on U.S. soil.

      The phrase "this is well documented", posted without any documentation, can be translated as meaning "this is not documented; I heard it from some conspiracy paranoid on the internet somewhere".

      China does execute more people than rest of world combined

    6. Re:The Chinese are not the good guys by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The Chinese government aren't good guys either, but they don't have any jurisdiction over me either.

      Of course I build my own network hardware these days.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    7. Re:The Chinese are not the good guys by gravewax · · Score: 1

      I don't visit china and the Chinese government have no jurisdiction or even much in the way of government cooperation. It isn't about which government is worse it is which has the power to fuck me over, the Chinese can collect all they want, they can't do shit to me, the NSA or other 5 eyes if they decide to target me I am completely at their mercy.

    8. Re:The Chinese are not the good guys by sit1963nz · · Score: 1

      The USA are not the good guys either.

      https://www.theguardian.com/bo...

      However, the 96% of the worlds population who are NOT US citizens would like to invoke Trumpian politics and say "USA LAST" and this trade war is yours, not ours. Also No deal with the US is better than a bad deal with the US.

    9. Re:The Chinese are not the good guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If that's all you care about, you're worthy of pity regardless of where you live, if you're poor or rich, healthy or sick.

    10. Re:The Chinese are not the good guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The U.S. government has directly and indirectly killed over a hundred thousand women, children, and other civilians, in the Middle East in the last 15 years. There's nothing that Chinese government has done that would put them close to being worse than the U.S. government.

    11. Re:The Chinese are not the good guys by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      True, the Chinese prefer to do that to their own people.

      More considerate to the world, granted, but then again, does it really matter that much where the humans are from that are being killed?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    12. Re:The Chinese are not the good guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meanwhile in civilized world, it is completely unknown.

    13. Re:The Chinese are not the good guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The GLF was over 60 years ago, and the Chinese have seemed to learned from that experience. I'm not entirely sure the US has learned any lessons, and has continued to kill over the last 60 years if not in recent years accelerated that process.

  11. Give us a reason not to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's easy to say "we are concerned about huawei".
    You know what would instantly cause people to stop using it?
    Telling us what exact vulnerabilities, backdoors, and spying features are in there and we can confirm and stop using.
    Without that your requests are useless.

  12. No evidence, no proof, no oversight by Tokolosh · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If the US government has information that Huawei is nefarious, why not present the evidence? Instead, we must trust the say-so of an organization that asserts the right to snoop on it's own citizens, to drone-strike them without trial, and to prosecute non-US whistleblowers.

    I realize that the Chinese are not innocent, but from the point of view of an American they are the lesser of two evils.

    --
    Prove anything by multiplying Huge Number times Tiny Number
    1. Re:No evidence, no proof, no oversight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Likely to protect the inside source of of the intelligence. The Chinese government isn’t exactly known for exorcising due process and the protection of human and civil rights.

    2. Re:No evidence, no proof, no oversight by Type44Q · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I realize that the Chinese are not innocent, but from the point of view of an American they are the lesser of two evils.

      Only an ignorant American. Our government may be just as stupid, corrupt and evil as China's but their respective methods of maintaining control differ enough that it's obvious which regime people usually try to escape from... and which one* they try to escape to.*

      *Media grandstanding notwithstanding (say that fast)

    3. Re:No evidence, no proof, no oversight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the US government has information that Huawei is nefarious, why not present the evidence

      Exactly, the US is in the middle of a trade war with China.

      Why would we take such claims at face value?

      Trump lies like the crook that he is, and is not above directing his subordinates to lie.

      Sorry, but the US has little credibility these days, and we're not all so concerned about advancing US interests.

      Proof, or STFU, but stop pretending we take orders from you or care about what you want.

      That sack of shit Trump has made it pretty clear he doesn't give a fuck about us, so trust me, we no longer give a fuck about you.

      Allies? Now that's a bad joke these days.

    4. Re:No evidence, no proof, no oversight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the US government has information that Huawei is nefarious, why not present the evidence?

      Because disclosing information often also discloses tools and methods in which the information was acquired. For example, if they intercepted internal chinese comms discussing huawei's negarious deeds, then revealing those comms will make it easier for the chinese to close that spyhole. It is reasonable to expect the US to disclose the information to partner nations in classified briefings, but not to the general public (who really can't evaluate the factualness anyway, its not like the Chinese are suddenly going to admit it when present with the intercepts, they'll just claim they are forgeries).

      However, in this case, its moot. In practice, "America First" has meant "America Alone" and this situation is a perfect example, the other countries just DGAF because we've burned those bridges. MUHGUHHH!!!

    5. Re:No evidence, no proof, no oversight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Despite tronald dump's best efforts, the chinese currently are kicking our asses when it comes to number of people held in concentration camps.

    6. Re:No evidence, no proof, no oversight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I imagine they have, just not publicly. Much like the tape of the Saudi's grinding up the journalist. It is shared, just not publicly.

    7. Re: No evidence, no proof, no oversight by ljw1004 · · Score: 2

      I think the question is different... as a private US individual just doing my own stuff unrelated to national security, I'd prefer to be spied upon by the Chinese rather than the US government, simply because they won't care about most of the things I do.

    8. Re:No evidence, no proof, no oversight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neither is the US government.

    9. Re: No evidence, no proof, no oversight by RuiFRibeiro · · Score: 1

      Amen brother. Unfortunately, I often say it, and people do not understand....

    10. Re:No evidence, no proof, no oversight by XXongo · · Score: 1

      Likely to protect the inside source of of the intelligence. The Chinese government isn’t exactly known for exorcising due process and the protection of human and civil rights.

      Well, yes, if the Chinese figure out how the US got their information, people will die. http://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/22952/chinas-dismantling-of-cia-spy-ring-highlights-growing-dystopian-like-surveillance-state, https://www.businessinsider.com/how-china-found-cia-spies-leak-2018-8

      --
      (*"exercising", I think. Although "exorcising due process" is an apt bon mot)

    11. Re: No evidence, no proof, no oversight by brunes69 · · Score: 1

      +1000.

      If I had mod points, you'd get them.

    12. Re: No evidence, no proof, no oversight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You honestly trust China over the NSA?

      Where are the NSA's "re-education camps"?
      Where's the NSA's social scoring system ?
      When's the last time the NSA made someone famous simply disappear for weeks?

      I'm not religious, but y'all need Jesus.

    13. Re:No evidence, no proof, no oversight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have to remember there are economic reasons for "escaping" that are unrelated to government or politics. But yeah, instead of just trying to control our own citizens, Americans try to control other people's citizens through bombing and shelling to maintain control. That's awesome and great.

    14. Re:No evidence, no proof, no oversight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While the US is kicking everyone else's asses on the amount of people bombed. Probably far more than 1M innocent Muslims from US meddling.

    15. Re:No evidence, no proof, no oversight by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      I think you misunderstand the question. Let's say the Chinese government knows everything I do. Sort of like Google. How could they possibly use that to harm me? Where's the motivation? On the other hand the US government has made it very clear it hates my guts and would very much like to harm me. You see the difference here?

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    16. Re:No evidence, no proof, no oversight by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2

      Ok I'll bite: how would the Chinese government harm me? Let's say they have everything I do on my phone. What form would this harm take? And more importantly what would the motivation be? The US government has made it clear it hates us deplorables. They have the motivation and the means to harm us. How is China the worse choice?

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    17. Re:No evidence, no proof, no oversight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BTW. There are actually quite a bit of illegal immigrants in China as well, just so you know. Many for economic reasons as China gets economically stronger.

    18. Re: No evidence, no proof, no oversight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd prefer to be spied upon by the Chinese rather than the US government, simply because they won't care about most of the things I do.

      Don't be a fool. Do you think they would spy on you because its worthless to them? No fucking way. If they are spying on you, it means they intend to use that info to benefit themselves. At least with the american government you have a vote, and a constitution, and a judiciary. What recourse do you have if the chinese government decides to use your info to fuck you?

    19. Re:No evidence, no proof, no oversight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sort of like Google. How could they possibly use that to harm me? Where's the motivation?

      They could use that info to build a psychological profile of you to see how best to manipulate you with disinformation so as to make you an unwitting agent of their foreign policy objectives. But yeah, no motivation at all.

      This isn't rocket economics -- they wouldn't waste their resources on spying on you if there wasn't a pay off for them.

    20. Re:No evidence, no proof, no oversight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Say what you will about american hypocrisy and disrespect of foreign soverignty, but those people in china's concentration camps are chinese citizens. That's taking it a whole new level.

    21. Re:No evidence, no proof, no oversight by sjames · · Score: 1

      As an American living in the U.S. not handling classified material, Chinese spying is not much of a personal concern. If I was Chinese or living in China, it would bve much more concerning personally.

    22. Re:No evidence, no proof, no oversight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point is that China isn't an existential threat to many nations, but the US clearly is an existential threat with its ability to travel anywhere around the world and bomb the hell out of you for batting an eye.

      Say what you want, but Uighurs to a degree ARE an existential threat to the Chinese government, many have been radicalized, especially after US escapades in Central Asia and the Middle East. That 10% of Muslims in many more moderate countries believe that there are justifications for terrorism, means that there's probably a good deal of Uighurs in China who believe the same thing, especially the ones who have traveled to nearby foreign countries, or other Muslim countries.

    23. Re: No evidence, no proof, no oversight by sound+vision · · Score: 1

      Is your job of any importance, and have you ever heard of "industrial espionage"? If not, it's time to hit up Wikipedia.

      Bleeding the bank accounts or trashing the credit of random unimportant citizens would be a nice way to throw a wrench in the US economy, as well. This could be arranged so that each instance looks like "normal" fraud. (Funnily enough the US does have double the bank/CC fraud of anyone else by most measures...)

      And now, the modern miracle of social media has enabled targeted misinformation campaigns. Elections are the most obvious target, but we see these tactics can also be used to get a flash mob to stone someone to death, or shoot up a pizza parlor.

    24. Re:No evidence, no proof, no oversight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or to advertise.

      They're an export-driven economy.

      Which makes such "spying" (data collection) about as harmless as...Google's or any other ad company.

      Indeed they could just buy an ad company and get as much data on users--and probably already have.

      Which means this is FUD.

    25. Re:No evidence, no proof, no oversight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BTW. Look up statistics on the percentage of black males are place in prison in their lifetime, or just about any minority in the US. If you think Uighurs are an injustice, then look at America's prison statistics. At least China's version of their "prison" for Uighurs are focusing on trying to integrate them further into Chinese society. I can't say that's exactly the same with the American prison system.

    26. Re:No evidence, no proof, no oversight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, they find out your mental susceptibilities and then use them to convince you to go on slashdot and tell everyone that there is nothing to see here. And you'd think it was actually your idea to do it too.

    27. Re:No evidence, no proof, no oversight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but they could tear apart one device they are aware of having the backdoor and present it to everybody.

      We all know they don't. Huawei is on the kill-wish-list because it is a tech giant. In China. A big obstacle for wishes that US remains dominant in tech.

    28. Re:No evidence, no proof, no oversight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our government may be just as stupid, corrupt and evil as China's ...

      Kudos, Americans tend to spend a lot time lying to themselves about this.

      ... which one* they try to escape to.

      Julian Assange chose Ecuador and Edward Snowden chose Russia. People 'escaping' from the USA won't choose the USA. People escaping from another country (See: Cuba.), will choose a country that makes a point of protecting their civic rights.

    29. Re: No evidence, no proof, no oversight by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      No I am an ordinary person. I have much more to fear from my own government than the distant Chinese. The intelligence community illegally spies on me - why? Why do they fear me? They're on my side - or I guess not.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    30. Re:No evidence, no proof, no oversight by Tom · · Score: 1

      I realize that the Chinese are not innocent, but from the point of view of an American they are the lesser of two evils.

      More importantly, from the POV of the american government, the backdoors your manufacturers added and told you about are better than the backdoors foreign manufacturers added and didn't tell you about.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    31. Re:No evidence, no proof, no oversight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, you should tell this to Snowden and to Assange.

    32. Re: No evidence, no proof, no oversight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The chinese government illegally spies on me - why? Why do they fear me? They're on my side - or I guess not.

      You are an ideal target for chinese manipulation. People utterly confident in their ignorance make the best marks.

    33. Re:No evidence, no proof, no oversight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least China's version of their "prison" for Uighurs are focusing on trying to integrate them further into Chinese society.

      JFC. Sounds like the chinese are already up in your phone and feeding you the state's western-facing propaganda lines.

  13. US asks foreign allies to BUY AMERICAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because that way the US can still spy on you, because you're not really our ally, you're just someone we're currently benefitting from working with, but we'll drop you as soon as we can.

  14. Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I understand other nations have asked the US to cooperate in other affairs, being rebuked. Now comes the US asking for cooperation, I wonder how that will go?

    1. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US doesn't have any "allies" anymore, Big Giant Orange Head has made that clear enough. Although if you are on the "approved dictators" list, that's different.

      So F- the US, who needs "friends" like those? Once the US learns what friends are again, and apologized for being giant douches, then we can talk.

    2. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess that's the choice here. Friends with powerful dictators that will crush the weak and then stab each other in the back, or allies with smaller countries with others that are more dependent and quietly trying to crush the weak by sapping their wages and hoarding the money.

      Even if you're evil, Resident Chump's way is, while faster, disadvantageous in the end.

  15. Americans are already spying on is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every time I go online some American company has a script running in the background. Ublock orgin says that this very page has at least 6 third party script. I'm not bothered by the Chinese when Americans are doing it so blatantly and getting away with it.

  16. Nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chinese meddling.

  17. There is a big difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For all the things that are terrible about the USA, they don't compare with the evil of the Chinese.
    Make a list of pros and cons, please.

    Consider human rights, economics, showing friendship in bad times and a sense of fair play in the world. The USA isn't perfect, but do you have **any** doubt who would show up in a time of need?

    As for the warnings against Huawei, they have been caught multiple times sending data back to China and claiming they don't.

    With US equipment makers, there is a public fight against the USGovt overreaching. If you are outside the USA, it is probably better. We inside only have 1 method to fight unknown, spying, and that is strong encryption at all levels. Our huge tech companies understand how important this is and can easily sway public opinion using their media power to prevent new laws. The US also has a judicial system that can protect us AND the world from the idiot in charge for the next 2 yrs. The world has seen that with IiC attempts to override current immigration laws with executive orders.

    Inside the USGovt there are many good people. These warnings are coming from that group, not the group under the IiC trying to make economic difficulties for China and Xi (the DiC).

    BTW, I own a Huawei smartphone. Got it for $99 in 2017 for a $200 phone. Wiped the preinstalled OS and replaced it. I won't be buying any more Huawei equipment. They've decided to prevent unlocking their boot loader. I just don't trust the company. Previously, I had a Google Nexus phone. Won't be buying anything from Google either after they dropped support 3+ year before the hardware would be out of date. I just don't trust google.

    1. Re:There is a big difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All besides the point.

  18. Pre-Existing Meddling by Pimpy · · Score: 1

    If these countries wanted to avoid meddling by foreign powers, they might start with throwing out the US military bases.

  19. what allies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Saudi arabia, North Korea?

  20. Huawei excellent product. USA jealous. by keneng · · Score: 1

    Huawei and their Kirin SOC's are awesome. I plan to buy a SBC built with SOC similar to their MATE 20 Pro for Linux when they become available.

    Consumer freedoms are hampered by listening to all this USA economic intervention. The small guys lose in this scenario with less product variety. No. I won't accept this. Canada should not heed to this request.

    1. Re:Huawei excellent product. USA jealous. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      less product variety.

      How can it get any worse than it is now? Just about every commodity product of 'type' is made in the same chinese factory with different names and prices slapped on it.

      The biggest problem is that by concentrating all manufacturing into one area of the planet, if something happens to that region or the government goes into internal turmoil the entire planet's economy suffers. There is an old saying 'don't put all your eggs in one basket'.

      Consumer freedoms? Our current choices are chinese made this or china made that. The sad part is that we allowed this to happen.

  21. Commercial networks ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... should be considered to be compromised. No matter who's hardware they use. If your telecommunications need to be secure, you need to encrypt/decrypt it before it touches these networks. Because you never know who's hardware is connected to that network.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Commercial networks ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except the end points are never secure either. Now what?

    2. Re:Commercial networks ... by PPH · · Score: 1

      First, that's a pretty big assumption. And if true, then what good would securing the middle of the network be? (the place you'd find the Huawei equipment.)

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  22. If there is a door anyone can open it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You assume that US government is unable to spy you using Chinese hardware backdoors. Not a valid assumption.

    If (when) there are backdoors in your firewall then you will be spied upon by all the players including criminals looking for credit card info and extortion material.

  23. I'm confused by AxeTheMax · · Score: 2

    Is this a case of the pot calling the kettle black, or is it the other way around?

    1. Re:I'm confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except China builds the pot and the kettle.

  24. Any phone is easy to monitor... by MindPrison · · Score: 1

    ...there are PLENTY of Darkhat Youtube videos out there that will tell you in DETAIL how to do it, just with a little patience and 2 hours on your hands, you can do it to your OWN PHONE PLEASE just to get the idea of you being "protected" by a particular country out of your head, if you REALLY want to know - that is.

    Anyway, I have a lot of smartphones, and I got the Huawei Pro 20 for the Camera, but what surprises me is how snappy it is in comparison to all the other phones, to me - that indicates less bloatware, and less processes bogging down the phone. I can have mine on 3 months in a row without the need to restart it, and it's still insanely snappy and smooth, can't say that for any other phone I've used, it even reports if there's a process somewhere that is drawing too much power during the time the particular process isn't being used for something I use, very nifty feature.

    So this is just Government FUD. I love Murican's with all of my heart, they're an open minded people, who gladly gives more than they can afford (I've been there so many times), but their government - oh boy... something needs to happen there, fast.

    --
    What this world is coming to - is for you and me to decide.
  25. NSA installing spyware on Cisco routers by SonarNerd · · Score: 1

    Everyone still remembers the information about NSA installing spyware on Cisco routers, right? Maybe sales and thus information from such have strangely decreased? So let's call an ad-campaign!

  26. Foreign Allies Asks US To go fuck themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pics or it didn't happen.

  27. Americans are generous... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To people they are trying to impress or pretend they are homey to, particularly Europeans and sometimes Japanese/Chinese.

    Being an American I can tell you it changes very quickly if they know your politics, or can become condescending, or outright racist if you are part of the 'pariah groups of the decade'.

    Try being openly gay, pregnant out of wedlock, black, native american, or a variety of other things and see who is genuine and helpful and who is doing it for ulterior reasons. Hint: a lot is far more ugly than it seems as a semi-oblivious tourist/citizen.

    - A formerly oblivious citizen whose optimism has transitioned to pessimism and cynicism through years of experience.

  28. It is not a binary choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I realize that the Chinese are not innocent, but from the point of view of an American they are the lesser of two evils.

    Even if that's true, why in the world would you think that having china up in your business would keep the US govt out? Your nihlist scenario doesn't add up. The evil US govt is going to be spying on you anyway, adding china to the mix just adds more evil. That is not a win for you.

  29. How not to get spied on by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    Know who is looking and why.
    Got skilled scientists and lots of new patents? Winning international contracts with real innovation and actual skill? Can your company win a bid on price and quality?
    Got smart staff who can out think the global competition as they got promoted on merit?
    Selling dual use https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... products globally?

    Understand what the NSA, GCHQ, Chain, EU wants from deep in your electronic networks.

    Have nothing of future interest on your internet facing networks other than existing business products and services, support.
    Have your vital meetings away from all consumer electronic devices with secret long term meeting records kept on paper.
    When its on a network it can't just be copied out.
    When different nations security services can not get your company plans electronically they will try in person.
    Place a camera near some secure paper "files" and see who shows an interest on getting access at different times.
    Secure your offices from walk in spying attempts like in person penetration testing.
    Look into the political backgrounds of all staff to see who would talk to another nations spy agencies due to faith, cult, citizenship, friendship, politics, debt, lifestyle.

    Don't buy products/services and from brands known to have backdoors. If one nations security services have the network keys so do other nations and business competitors.
    Dont let strange NGO workers, charity workers, new best friends wonder around your secure buildings.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  30. So *now* we are "Foreign Allies... by DeanElhard · · Score: 1

    ... as opposed to the last year or so when it's been "Threats to National Security" for daring to make cars, steel, and aluminum... This feels like the guy who just spent the last 2 hours drunkenly and loudly cursing out his girlfriend at the bar and falsely claiming she cheated on him storming off and getting pulled over by the cops for DUI and then calling the same girlfriend to come bail him out...

  31. Until they start colluding... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If there is one thing that convinces governments to collude, it is the risk of their citizens rising up when they realize where the power actually lies.

    China is worried about it, and so is the powers that be in the US (not the Deep State that a lot of 'Republicans' are parroting, but the real and bipartisan big money and 'national security' apparatus that has grown beyond its mandates and the law.) When push comes to shove it is very likely you will see these two groups sharing information on their consumer products to more effectively spy on their own citizens (or if legal concerns come into play, having the other side spy for them.) At that point the circle of surveillance will be complete and the major first world countries will all have their citizenry under control, even as they plot and backstab and backdoor each other's non-civilian infrastructure in an attempt to gain a little more of the pie for 'their team' amongst the aristocrats, merchant princes, and party leaderships.

  32. depends on what you are up to by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    If you are a spy or are committing crimes in a domestic nation and you do not mind the idea of being blown by a nuke, then go with the Chinese stuff.
    OTOH, if that does not apply to you, you can get networking gear from America, Canada, Spain, Germany, France, Australia, Japan, S. Korea, etc.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  33. manufactured in China by Khashishi · · Score: 1

    What is the difference between a Chinese company and an American company that manufactures in China? It seems like either can have a Chinese backdoor. But I suppose it's easier for the NSA to put a backdoor into an American company's product.

  34. You need to keep working on the meds... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I'm in Australia and buy the wrong brand of router, America will nuke me?

  35. Hey Ivan try again in English by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IFF they have hard evidence of your being a criminal
    Your what now?

  36. Hey Ivan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In fact, unless they have a warrant, they can not do anything.

    You may want to look up "parallel construction". Use which ever Russian search engine gives you the best results.
    Gotta help out a fellow troll.

    America's version - Hey it looks like your brother is getting married, would be a shame if a drone strike took out the wedding wouldn't it. Yes OK, what can I do to help?

  37. I don't get their reasoning. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > The US is reportedly particularly worried about the use of Huawei equipment in countries with American military bases, since most ***nonsensitive*** communication travels via commercial networks,

    If it's non-sensitive, who gives a rat's rear-end *who* knows about it?

    My main issue with recommendations from the US is that they appear to have lost all credibility in preferring income from arms sales over justice for murdered journos. I think the greatest political idea in the US is the two-term limits for presidents, that way at least you can limit damage from mentally deficient, woman-hating a*seholes :-)

  38. no too bright are you WindBourne by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    America is 10 times more polluting than Germany.
    America is worse than the whole EU added together. Grow a brain or something moron.

  39. Parallel construction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The NSA can not touch a single American

    Parallel construction

    Looks like you didn't get a chance to search for it yet. Or more likely you didn't like what you found so pretend it doesn't exist.

    Bet you have never even heard of the term "anonymous tip" either. Being such the naive fool that you so clearly are.

    They are NOT allowed to do that.

    Oh I'm sure that stops them...
    LOL you're an idiot.

  40. Black bag, off to GITMO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What third party country do the Chinese use when they want someone disappeared?
    Guess it's still better than America's bestest buddies the Saudi's who just murder them when they become inconvenient.

    1. Re:Black bag, off to GITMO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And China does not kill its enemies, even when it is their own citizens? Please. In fact, China murders 100s-1000s x as many as Saudi does, each year.

    2. Re:Black bag, off to GITMO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many Americans did it murder in cold blood?
      How many planes full of people did it crash into American buildings?
      More or less than Saudi Arabia?

  41. guess they don't have Google in your country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/09/nsa-spying-brazil-oil-petrobras

    In a statement issued on Sunday night after the latest revelations aired in Brazil, the US director of national intelligence, James Clapper, said: "It is not a secret that the intelligence community collects information about economic and financial matters, and terrorist financing.

    "We collect this information for many important reasons: for one, it could provide the United States and our allies early warning of international financial crises which could negatively impact the global economy. It also could provide insight into other countries' economic policy or behavior which could affect global markets."

    The fucking director admitted they use it for 'economic' reasons.

  42. guess they don't have comprehension in yours by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    From your link:

    But he again denied this amounted to industrial espionage. "What we do not do, as we have said many times, is use our foreign intelligence capabilities to steal the trade secrets of foreign companies on behalf of – or give intelligence we collect to – US companies to enhance their international competitiveness or increase their bottom line."

    NSA is not dealing with industrial espionage. They are looking to find who is funding terrorists, or who is making secret deals with other nations, such as petrobras quietly making deals with both China and North Korea to sell them oil. Petrobras wanted to keep that quiet, but NSA DID find it out. And yes, NSA will want to know when a nationally owned company makes deals with both China/North Korea and then tries to keep it quiet. But that is not trade secrets. Those are secrets that were obviously ordered by the Brazilian president.
    So no, the fucking director backed up windy.

    1. Re:guess they don't have comprehension in yours by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You logic is amazing, do you also do balloon animals?
      It's quite clear they do, it's common knowledge to people who know about these things.