Slashdot Mirror


Trump Suggests US Could Slap 10 Percent Tax On iPhones, Laptops From China (cnbc.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from CNBC: President Donald Trump suggested he could place a 10 percent tariff on iPhones and laptops imported from China, in an interview with the Wall Street Journal published Monday. He also said it's "highly unlikely" that he would delay an increase in tariffs from 10 percent to 25 percent on Jan. 1, just four days before a summit with Chinese President Xi Jinping. "Maybe. Maybe. Depends on what the rate is," the president said to The Wall Street Journal about the possible iPhone and laptop tariffs. "I mean, I can make it 10 percent, and people could stand that very easily."

53 of 387 comments (clear)

  1. "people could handle that very easily" by Plus1Entropy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sure, everyone could handle a 10% tax very easily. Oh unless you're super rich, then you need a tax cut.

    Either that, or just secure a small million dollar loan from your daddy.

    Our President is a stuck up, toffee nosed, elitist twat.

    --
    Only crack the nuts that crack. You don't put the ones that don't crack in the sack.
    1. Re: "people could handle that very easily" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Apple could easily afford to drop the price 10% too. I feel like they are at the top of what folks are willing to pay. Early on i would just upgrade when i felt the need... now i give it a lot more thought... and im sure im like most slashdotters, i can afford to upgrade unlike most of my friends and family. I say bring in the 10%, if that moves some of the manufacturing to the USA or even just North America its a win

    2. Re:"people could handle that very easily" by grasshoppa · · Score: 4, Insightful

      He's not wrong; iPhones are a luxury item. If you can't afford the hike, you shouldn't be buying one to begin with.

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    3. Re:"people could handle that very easily" by sit1963nz · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I wonder if the clothes etc Trump buys in from China for his own golf courses will see a 10% tariff, same with the stuff Ivanka sells.... nah no tariff on their stuff.

    4. Re:"people could handle that very easily" by mycroft16 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Trump is trying to play this like zero sum game in which he wins and everyone else loses. In economics that's a really stupid way to do things because if everyone else loses who is buying all the stuff you're winning at making? No one. Oops, you collapse as well. Sure China has some rather aggravating trade practices and corporate espionage seems like a regular old Tuesday over there... but you can't just go slapping tariffs on everyone and everything without some serious repercussions that he seems incapable of grasping. China needs the same things it needed before the trade war, and it's going to start looking elsewhere for them, and set up new trade agreements with other countries for those things. And when the trade war settles and the dust clear and the US is exporting stuff again to them... are they going to buy it, or stick with their new trade partners? Historically it has always taken YEARS to re-enter a market that a trade war has pushed us out of. Or anyone for that matter. And since China seems more than happy to just sit and wait for Trump to rot, this is not going to end well for him.

    5. Re:"people could handle that very easily" by sheramil · · Score: 4, Funny

      Elitists are often people who think they know things.

      Don't ask me how I know this.

    6. Re:"people could handle that very easily" by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 5, Informative

      Either that, or just secure a small million dollar loan from your daddy.

      Please stop repeating this lie. I know, it sounds like it's making fun of Trump, but it's actually buying into his hype. His trust fund was paying him over $250k a year (inflation adjusted) every year since he was born. His dad bought him his first apartment complex. His dad loaned him (illegal) $3 million (not inflation adjusted) dollars when his casino was going bust. He inherited somewhere north of a half a billion dollars (and some estimates go to multiples of it).

      To end up where Trump is, even starting with a million dollar loan, is impressive. To end up where Trump is with where he actually started is about as impressive as... well, inheriting money and living off the interest.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    7. Re: "people could handle that very easily" by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 2

      Because telling your team what it's doing wrong (and why) is exactly the same thing as playing for the other team. *eyeroll*

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    8. Re: "people could handle that very easily" by datavirtue · · Score: 2

      It was actually uncovered that he had 47MM in loans (most never repaid) from his father on top of million in salaries and revenue schemes from rental properties. After all that he inherited his father's empire and sold it off. He duped banks out of hundreds of millions and was given hundreds of millions often running into serious financial trouble along the way. I was duped by Trumps insane genius for marketing as we're many others.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
  2. $12 billion farm bailout by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Perhaps you missed the obvious, but he's already bailing out US farmers to the tune of $12 billion to compensate for lost sales to China.

    Worse, he's paying it to Chinese owned companies like WH Group:

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/chinese-owned-pork-producer-qualifies-for-money-under-trumps-farm-bailout/2018/10/23/154764da-d3ce-11e8-83d6-291fcead2ab1_story.html

    And if he slaps a big tarif on Apple, they'll demand compensation too. Either directly or through the courts, since he's not within the Executive branches *limited* powers to kill ratified trade treaties wholesale. Apple can sue if they don't get compensated.

    Also imagine how it would be if Apple does not get compensated, yet Chinese companies do get compensation from Trump?

    IMHO, the US $ nearly collapsed after Bush did his 2004 monetary inflation. Here they're doing a 10% increase in money supply, gifted as tax cuts to rich people (around $1.5 to $1.9 trillion). That needs to be anchored in trade since you need China to need to buy US bonds to soak up the debt and force the retained $ value.

    IMHO2: Ukraine is about to be invaded by Russia, and we'll get a lot of distraction like this.

    1. Re:$12 billion farm bailout by caseih · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Really you don't find Russia's imminent invasion of Ukraine deeply worrisome?

      There was a time when America and its people cared about others across the world, just because it was the right thing to do, and knowing that helping them free themselves and advance economically would ultimately directly benefit the safety and security of the US. In short, making friends makes us safer than making enemies. That old way has gone now, and even more sadly the attitude of many Americans towards their fellow humans in other countries is taking on a decidedly adversarial tone. Does not bode well for anyone.

    2. Re:$12 billion farm bailout by Xenx · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That old way has gone now, and even more sadly the attitude of many Americans towards their fellow humans in other countries is taking on a decidedly adversarial tone.

      It's not only towards the ones in other countries....

    3. Re: $12 billion farm bailout by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You clearly have no idea what made your country great in the first place.

    4. Re:$12 billion farm bailout by Aighearach · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In the United States, you can't discriminate against a US person or a US company based on country of origin.

      That is one of the things involved in the trade dispute; anybody in the world can open a US company, or buy one, but Americans can't open a branch in China and do business there without creating a joint partnership.

      That is clearly imbalanced and unfair. Personally, I think it is silly to fight a trade war over it; it would be better for a President to fight a legislative war with Congress over the rules, and try to get them to establish parity-based rules for foreign access to our markets. But Trump wants to fight a trade war over, so that is what we're doing. But clearly, under existing law, you can't give aid to US companies with conditions attached to country of origin of the owners.

      And that's actually fine for the trade war, because only a tiny number of US ag. business is Chinese owned.

      Everybody wants to buy US bonds, you don't need China for that. Their desire for purchases only cause the market to be less profitable for everybody buying. It doesn't even affect the US government.

    5. Re:$12 billion farm bailout by sit1963nz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      When the hell was that ?? The US has always treated its "friends" with contempt.

    6. Re: $12 billion farm bailout by Interfacer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If the US would pull out of Europe, I'd take time off from work to help pack.
      Why do you think the US is trying to insert itself everywhere? It's for influence.
      Why do you think Trump was so angry with Macron calling for the creation of European armed forces? It's not because of NATO. Ironically, spending on European Armed forces from within members states would count as spending for NATO. Trump was angry because the very idea of not needing the US policeman is a threat to the influence of the US.

      Trump doesn't want Europe to have their own independent forces. Trump wants us to just have NATO. Because NATO is purely mutual defense, whereas European forces could be deployed globally, and thereby decrease the importance of US forces. And in the current climate, many countries would be more likely to accept European forces than US forces.

      Or did you think that the US was playing global policeman out of benevolence?
      And if the US would pull out of NATO? They're welcome to. It would mean Europe would be forced to ramp up military spending, and make the US irrelevant in European decisions. Do you think the US government would enjoy losing all the influence they have?

  3. Do it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you're wealthy enough to purchase an iPhone, you're wealthy enough to pay this tax. If not, I guess Apple is going to lose a number of customers.

    Plus, this effectively also serves as a corporate tax given that iPhones are fairly common for commercial use.

    This may end up being a fairly progressive tax.

    1. Re:Do it. by johnsie · · Score: 2

      Most people who have iphones get them on credit, eg a monthly contract. You don't even need to be wealthy to get that. Just very bad at managing your money efficiently

  4. Tariffs cost GM one billion dollars by Streetlight · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So, what does GM do - start the process of eliminating ~15,000 jobs and closing factories. I know, it's more complicated than that in that competition for foreign car makers, most of whom make cars in the US with likely higher quality products, changes in customer preferences to SUVs and trucks, and the availability of hybrid and electric vehicles from other companies. Another example is Ford's decision not to make a car for import to the US from China and rejecting the suggestion that it be made in the North America because it would cost too much.

    No one wins from a trade war.

    --
    In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell
    1. Re:Tariffs cost GM one billion dollars by Pentium100 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      And only the rich win from open trade and being able to screw the local workers.

      So, since it's a lose-lose proposition for me, I'd rather see the rich lose too.

      Also, people talk about how we should take care of the environment, governments pass laws that forbid dumping toxic waste into a river etc. However, you can always open a factory in China, produce as much CO2 as you want, dump as much toxic waste into rivers as you want, that will allow you to make the product cheaper and you will out-compete the local factories that have to use expensive equipment to clean out their waste and reduce their CO2 emissions. Being able to use child labor and no need to care about workplace safety is also great. After all, what matters more than the income of shareholders?

    2. Re: Tariffs cost GM one billion dollars by astrofurter · · Score: 2

      "No one wins from a trade war."

      Have you seen the sorry state of the American economy? At this point, there's no possible way we could lose the trade way harder than we're already losing it.

    3. Re:Tariffs cost GM one billion dollars by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 2

      only the rich win from open trade and being able to screw the local workers.

      That's not true. Open trade increases the production possibilities frontier.

      Let's say you can produce 5 tonnes of potato or 3 tonnes of grain with the same labor-hours. Another country can produce 3 tonnes of potato or 5 tonnes of grain with the same labor-hours. Your labor-hours might be 40 and theirs 50, but that doesn't matter.

      If you produce 10 tonnes of potato and they produce 10 tonnes of grain, you can trade, and each of you can have 5 tonnes of potato and 5 tonnes of grain while investing the same amount as you would have to get 8 tonnes in total of both. That's an extra 2 tonnes of food for the same labor.

      Exchange rates are sort of an arbitration between these things: those people over there actually put in more labor-hours to make grain than we do, but they sacrifice even more of their labor if they make potato. Their ability to produce and buy is lower, so their full-time working hours have less purchasing power. If we work 40 hours and they work 50 hours in this example, it's like we make $25/hr and they make $20/hr, hence the exchange rate.

      So how does this impact the average buyer?

      Let's say we opened a factory making pants at the same quality level as Chinese import pants (men and boys's cotton pants and trousers). To achieve a higher quality costs additional labor investment; people try to argue the American-made pants would be higher-quality, and pretend that it wouldn't be more-expensive than making them at the same quality as the displaced Chinese import, so I've learned to short-circuit that argument.

      Running through about 4 pages of math, you eventually come up with pants increasing in price by 1.6x. That factors in the cost of shipping--importing a 40-foot container from China with 20,000 pairs of pants costs $1,300, or 6.5 cents per pair--as well as labor.

      The capacity to purchase falls. The poorest experience the greatest new burdens, unable to buy more; the middle-class also face these higher prices, of course, and can handle it better than the poor. Middle-classers sacrifice luxuries, while the poor sacrifice necessities.

      You create around 50,000 factory jobs to keep up with the demand for American-made pants. You lose shipping and retail jobs--around 90,000 of them, giving a net loss of 40,000 American jobs.

      So Americans are now poor and unemployed.

      The part most people stumble over is structural change: every increase in wealth requires new technology or new trade. These wealth increases mean there's more per person; yet it also means we can get more of something with fewer workers making that thing. That means layoffs, it mean changes in where money is flowing, and it often means an entire town's economy collapses and never recovers.

      In other words: the 99.9% are richer. The 99.9% include the top 1% and much of the bottom 1%. The 0.1% are displaced workers who were sacrificed so the rest of us can be richer.

      Circle back, though: didn't I say we're all richer?

      There's more available per person. More purchasing power per person. That means, including the displaced workers, you might divide our total purchasing power and find that there's $1,000 more per person. Let's call it 10% richer: we went from $100,000 per person to $101,000 (yes, it's actually about $60,000 GNI/C; work with me here).

      Well, why can't we all be 9% richer?

      The whole of the country can chip in 10% of what we have, and then pay out a flat benefit derived by dividing that among all adults. That's a type of Citizen's Dividend, a demogrant like a Universal Basic Income but not trying to pay e.g. enough to cover basic needs. It's opportunistic.

      More income? 10% is more money. Less income? 10% is less. 10% of $101k is $10,100, so if $101k is your GNI/C and 100% of that is exposed to the tax (it's not--it'd be corporate profits and per

  5. Re:More taxes by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Politicians of both parties are quite flippy-floppy on taxes, debt, war, regulation, immigration, spending, ally selection, states-rights, etc. as it serves their short-term political goals. This is largely because the average voter has a short memory.

  6. Re:Cool! Let's MAGA, baby! by LostMyBeaver · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What makes China your enemy? I can appreciate if you don't consider them friends, but have they done anything which you would consider targeted against you?

    If you want to blame someone for exporting American jobs, it wasn't China... it was Walmart.

    Walmart actually forced their suppliers to move manufacturing to China and threatened that if they didn't, they would make a competing product themselves in China and undercut their prices. Walmart also bullied Chinese companies into working faster and cheaper. Walmart also manipulated oil subsidies by exporting small amounts of things to China on American tax payers money and used the fuel paid for by the Americans to transport massive chunks of cargo back from China on the return trip. Walmart also manipulated the American social services system to provide welfare to their employees to avoid paying them themselves... the savings are paid as dividends to their shareholders.

    Pretty much every nasty thing in your head about China is actually Walmart. Walmart started it, now Amazon is continuing it, but Amazon will replace what few Americans are left in retail with robots instead allowing them to undercut Walmart and kill their business.

    No... you're really hating in the wrong direction. You should be hating on opportunistic Americans who proactively destroy American lives in order to make a quick buck. And BTW... many of these great Americans who are exporting everything to China to make a buck... they are registered voters and supporters of the Republican party.

    No China is not your enemy. They simply became rich while America became poor because American insisted on paying them to make stuff for them. Now that they're rich, they decided to buy the American dream but not export it back to the US.

    P.S. My daughter and I take Chinese lessons every week and she's preparing to study in China instead of the U.S.. She wanted to go to MIT or Berkley, but is heading to Bejing instead because now China has built top notch universities.

    What do you think it means when Europeans are looking east instead of west for ... well pretty much everything?

    I hope Trump's tariffs help you out. I know that I just working towards shifting one of Europe's oldest and biggest Cisco partners to being a Huawei partner too. The dollar is too high and Cisco just isn't that good anymore... their latest generation of.. well pretty much everything is about as good as what we used to call "Cheap Chinese Shit" and the so called "Cheap Chinese Shit" has gotten about as good as Cisco claims to be.

  7. Re:More taxes by 110010001000 · · Score: 3, Funny

    What were we talking about? Oh yeah, Democrats love their taxes.

  8. iPhones are luxury goods by melted · · Score: 2

    Poor people aren't buying them as it is. Rich people can handle another $100. Or they can just go with a Korean phone.

    1. Re:iPhones are luxury goods by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's not just iPhones that the tax is going on. Pretty much all phones will be affected.

      Trump's policy is attrition. He's hoping you can stand the pain longer than China.

      He is hoping that China will capitulate, but because China is not a democracy it can simply wait a couple of years to see what happens.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:iPhones are luxury goods by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 2

      You know what...I'm okay with playing that game of chicken. If we win it, better for us. If the Chinese do, then that's OK too. Better than the self-imposed death by a thousand cuts that "one way free trade" with China over the past twenty years has imposed on us.

    3. Re:iPhones are luxury goods by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 2

      That's a smokescreen. Both of your statements cannot be true at once. If it were robots, it wouldn't be China. Given that it is China, it cannot be robots.

      You're not the first Westerner to tell me with a straight face that it's really automation that's killing manufacturing. Another time, it was a PhD student at a highly ranked tech school here in the US. I whipped out my cell phone and told him that it was assembled by hand in China. He had no answer, because he too grew up in the 1990s in an upper middle class cocoon where the prevailing wisdom was that everyone should be white collar and somehow someone somewhere would make the stuff.

      He was kind of like you in his thinking. He was so deep in the mindset of not caring about how stuff got made so long as he could order it in Amazon that he truly believed that western societies shouldn't care or want to make their own stuff. He truly believed, as you seem to, that this was sustainable. The appeal to nonexistent automation was just a smokescreen for not having to ever have thought deeply on the subject.

      Incidentally, the Germans make all sorts of stuff that you might not think of as "high end" like kitchen knives and frying pans. They also invest in automation and vocational training. Because they believe in taking responsibility for making the shit they use, unlike the US where the aforementioned ruling classes who need someone to plug in their TV for them and believe making shit is dirty and undesirable.

  9. Re:Cool! Let's MAGA, baby! by Luckyo · · Score: 3, Informative

    If your daughter has any Chinese blood in her, I'd be very careful about these statements. China treats all people with ethnic Han roots like Chinese citizens when they're in China, which includes all of the relevant responsibilities. Something quite a few naive Westernern born and raised people with Han roots have been finding out over last decades with everything from detention and fines to blocking of leaving China just because their relatives have something Chinese state has interest in.

    Here's the latest example which has gotten too big for Western media majors to ignore:

    https://www.bbc.com/news/world...

  10. Re:Its Actually Laughable by Krishnoid · · Score: 5, Informative

    but when we lower corporate tax rates from 35% to 21%, which will lower the price of AMERICAN goods

    "Yup, we'll do that. Just let us complete these juicy <drool>, sorry, share buybacks ... sorry, this is gonna take a couple quarters for our finances to even out. Let us get back to you in a bit."

  11. Re:Its Actually Laughable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There is no evidence that lowered corporate taxes lowers the price of American goods. Lowered corporate taxes this time seem to have been used for stock buybacks, i.e. propping up market valuations. But don't let lack of evidence get in the way of corporate tax cuts because that wouldn't be AMERICAN.

  12. If people could "handle that easilly".... by mark-t · · Score: 2

    ... then doesn't that defeat the purpose?

    I mean, it just needlessly increases the cost of a good without giving anyone an incentive to move manufacturing into the USA because it's less expensive to just pay the tax than build entirely new domestic infrastructure that would in the long run, cost more anyways because of the costs of recovering those infrastructure costs.

    Of course, the problem with all of this is that long before you've applied any tax high enough to create such an incentive, you will have already created another incentive for a black market that will present its own problems.

  13. Re:Cool! Let's MAGA, baby! by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2

    It takes many years of study to achieve a level in Chinese that is high enough to study at university. You sure you're not just making that up? China offers a bunch of programs with instruction in English.

    Degrees from Chinese universities are problematic because everyone knows that the students cheat. Ask any American who has taught at a Chinese university, there are lots these days.

    The Europeans are welcome to buddy up to China instead of America. They said they were going to do it after Trump pulled us out of the Paris deal. They'll find out real fast that China aren't easily fooled chumps like America is. You think China is going to pay 80% of a defense "alliance"? No way, they're not idiots. You think they're going to have hugely unfair trade agreements that function as gigantic bribes to the tune of $150 billion a year? Hell no. Good luck with the Chinese. I hope they help you out, but I know that won't be the case.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  14. Re: Good. Fuck Apple by hawguy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In summary: fuck American workers, I wanna save a couple bucks on my iCrap!

    No, in summary: The globalization and automation genies are already out of the bottle, no matter how much you try to shove them back in, you can't.

    So you can either realize and accept the current situation (by training well educated workers that are capable of doing more than what a simple pick and place robot can do), or you can pretend globalization doesn't exist and tell uneducated workers that you're bringing jobs "back" to them, when reality those jobs aren't coming back.

  15. Re: Cool! Let's MAGA, baby! by AC-x · · Score: 5, Informative

    Washington's public policy was to offshore our entire industrial base and utterly neglect our infrastructure. Thereby impoverishing our working people, severely hampering our ability to fight a defensive war against a symmetric enemy, and fostering a culture of despair. Apparently the Establishment - President Trump's political enemies - considered that a "win".

    Except of course, instead of reversing that neglect Trump has lowered the tax rate of the very people who got rich offshoring while at the same time increased the cost of goods that ordinary people buy, increased the cost of raw materials like steel to US manufacturers and increased the cost of US exports to some markets.

  16. Re: Good. Fuck Apple by Zmobie · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Bingo. If I had mod points I'd up you instead of commenting... I worked in industrial automation for 6 years and have a very good understanding of this. Tech has advanced sufficiently now that we can make long term, very robust solutions for significantly cheaper than the labor costs. No matter how you slice it, that will not change.

    There would literally have to be an automation tax applied to companies doing it and that will never happen. If it did they would have to take the money from the tax and give it out as a UBI (which the Republicans would call an entitlement) to keep the economy from collapsing. It probably wouldn't even stop the automation because the technology will likely advance much too quickly for them to keep an effective tax on it. Then on the Democrat side, they won't tax it because they are fine with the globalization drive and the only way we can keep up in the US is to allow for new job TYPE creation (such as skilled technicians and such).

    I've tried to explain this again and again to people, but they don't seem to WANT to grasp it.

  17. He's Putin's little bitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    The only country he's making 'great again' is Russia. I see you're repeating Russian trolls with your "American troops out of Europe" trolls.

    Europe provided Ukraine with 1.2 billion euros, but US will only sell them $50 million in hand guns. Trump literally blocking sales of weapons to aid Russia and undermine its European military allies.

    You'll probably end up sending troops to fight Ukraine alongside Russian troops, and trolls like you will pretend its in Americas interests.

    Puppet states don't work without puppets and trolls like you.

    Remember Helsinki? Trump promising US troops would cooperate with Russian troops in Syria.. which would see US troops attacking US allies to prop up Assad.... and this just three months after Russian troops attacked US troops in Syria.

    https://nypost.com/2018/02/13/russians-attacked-american-troops-on-putins-orders/

  18. Re:Cool! Let's MAGA, baby! by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 3

    If you read more carefully, you'll find that many of those people are visiting China, and while there trying to exercise a dual nationality that the PRC does not recognise. The PRC recognises two citizenships: "Chinese" and "Other". Pick one.

    Iran does the same sort of thing, and folks who insist on retaining their Iranian citizenship and then travel there often find themselves in the same sorts of trouble.

    The US State Department makes it very clear that A dual citizen may be subject to the laws of the other country that considers that person its citizen while in that country's jurisdiction... Dual nationality may hamper efforts to provide U.S. consular protection to dual citizens in the foreign country of their other nationality. (See page 7 of your US passport.)

    The best thing to do if you are a citizen of either country, you become naturalised elsewhere, and your original citizenship is not revoked (China does this customarily to its nationals living overseas who take on a foreign citizenship, I've no idea about Iran), is to renounce your former citizenship, and make sure it's official under the laws of your original country. Do not attempt to return to your native country as a citizen of that country. Use your US passport, obtain a visa as a US citizen, and do not mention anything about dual nationality or previous nationality to any official of the other country. If you do--see above.

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  19. All the finesse and subtlety of a chainsaw.. by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ..with it's throttle stuck wide open.

    For fucks' sake, I fully understand that China is so corrupt and screwing us (and other countries) over, in more than just trade (militarily, human rights [comma, lack of], and so on, and so on) but there's got to be a better way to handle this than this.

    Of course you also have to admit: we're like spoiled-assed kids in this country. Our overall high standard of living is because everything has been so damned cheap for so many decades. You all complain about the cost of an iPhone, but if it was produced 100% here in the U.S. (from the smallest component on up), it would cost several times as much I'm sure, assuming they'd produce them at all (might be too expensive to produce in any quantity). Before anyone jumps my shit for that: without U.S. companies using Chinese companies for production, Chinas' economy would probably be absolute shit. So it is a two-way street -- but still there's got to be a better way to deal with this than what Trump is doing. He keeps trying to run a country like it's a business -- and he's not a good businessman to start with (vis-a-vis, all his bankruptcies and failures), and it's just a bad idea to run a country like it's a business anyway. He's achieving the opposite of what was intended: he's costing Americans money, he's destroying American jobs, and he's running American companies out of business. Do I have a better idea? No. If I did, I'd run for office. But someone else must have a better way to do this, and they're not stepping up -- or maybe they've been told to shut up.

  20. Re:Its Actually Laughable by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 4, Informative

    First, most products are not priced based on cost, but on the market power of the sellers. Most goods compete on non-price attributes.

    Second, taxes aren't just taxes. Tariffs raise the costs of goods sold, which means that they increase the costs to sell products. Taxes on profits don't. Hell, EBITDA is the common gold standard for how good an investment is, and it specifically excludes (income) taxes. It's the "T". But it doesn't exclude tariffs.

    --
    Your ad here. Ask me how!
  21. Re: How much this time, Donny? by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's why the Chinese are so upset with President Trump. It turns out, you can't really bribe a billionaire real estate mogul TV star President who's married to a supermodel - what exactly are they going to offer him that he doesn't already have?

    I'm sure the Russians and the Saudis could make some very helpful suggestions.

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  22. Re:I for one approve! by johnsie · · Score: 2

    That wouldn't just be iphones you plonker, it will be any phone that is built outside the US. It really is an idiot tax if you don't understand that ;)

  23. Re: Good. Fuck Apple by Powercntrl · · Score: 2

    the actual situation is merely that it would take time to ramp US production back up, and time for inventories to build to desired levels?

    The next administration can press the "undo" button on all of Trump's bullshit. No one with half a brain is going to invest a cent in increasing domestic production. All tariffs accomplish is hitting average hard-working Americans right in their wallets.

    --

    ---
    DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
  24. Re:I'm so old by Powercntrl · · Score: 2

    I remember when Republicans were against tax

    Judging by the shit I've seen "deplorables" post, I very much doubt many of them understand that it's a tax they'll have to cough up. I think they imagine Trump is just going to send a bill to China.

    --

    ---
    DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
  25. Go for it by stealth_finger · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Maybe pissing off the iCrowd will be the last straw.

    --
    Wanna buy a shirt?
    https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  26. 10%? Not enough. 50%! by Opportunist · · Score: 2

    Up the tariff! Create domestic jobs!

    Huh? No, not in production. In repairing and second hand sales. Because when a new phone costs about 2000 bucks, repairing your old one for 100 suddenly becomes very compelling.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  27. Tariffs go to the Governments by turp182 · · Score: 4, Informative

    In a trade war both sides raise taxes/tariffs. These, at least in the US are collected by the Treasury and go into the general fund.

    So:
    * Citizens purchasing foreign goods pay more (tariff is a tax)
    * Companies importing raw materials (for example, steel and aluminum) pay more (tariff is a tax), and will have to charge more for products (indirect tax)

    The goal of course is to move manufacturing into the US.

    But wage disparities cripple this in many cases. We could probably handle things like chip manufacturing competitively, but putting things together via humans is far more expensive in the US. Maybe robots are the answer (they are).

    The problem to me is timing. It takes a long time to move the product and processes the tariffs are targeting. And raw materials? Wage disparity again.

    Anyway, the tariffs are just a way to increase Federal income, from March through July it was about $1.4 billion from steel and aluminum:
    https://www.cnbc.com/2018/08/1...

    And per the Congressional Budget Office's Monthly Budget Review, "Other Income" was up by $1 billion (includes tariffs), about 1%. Corporate taxes dropped by $92 billion, about 31%.

    https://www.cbo.gov/system/fil...

    Anyway, corporate tax rate drop was a gift to the already wealthy ($92 billion!) and the tariffs are a tax on the citizens and revenue for the Federal government.

    --
    BlameBillCosby.com
  28. Billionaires by Tomahawk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is what happens when you put a billionaire in the White House. He has no idea that 10% is a huge amount for many people (let alone 25%!).

    Next time, guys, put a poor person, or even a homeless person, in there. Someone who has some concept of the value of $1.

    1. Re:Billionaires by DaMattster · · Score: 2

      This is what happens when you put a billionaire in the White House. He has no idea that 10% is a huge amount for many people (let alone 25%!).

      Next time, guys, put a poor person, or even a homeless person, in there. Someone who has some concept of the value of $1.

      He's worth substantially less than 1 billion. Trump would like to believe his net worth is in the billions.

  29. Re:Why stop at laptops and iphones? by joh · · Score: 2

    With so many things coming from China basically everything would become more expensive and this wouldn't exactly be a popular thing. Sticking it just to the elitist iPhone owners (although I fear Trump may be wrong here, but whatever) is more limited. Those who buy $200 China smartphone anyway will say "serves them right!" and love Trump even more. At least I'm fairly sure that Trump thinks this way.

  30. Re:Cool! Let's MAGA, baby! by molarmass192 · · Score: 2

    I don't know, I've been to San Francisco, Los Angeles, Boston, and New York over the last 6 months and the number of native Chinese seems to growing, not shrinking. I'm pretty sure they didn't come to the US to find worse paying jobs.

    --

    Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws-Plato
  31. Re:Cool! Let's MAGA, baby! by molarmass192 · · Score: 2

    Yeah, no, Russia spends 3x what Canada spends. Roughly the same as Saudi Arbia, sure, but Canada, no. source

    --

    Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws-Plato