Slashdot Mirror


Trump Admin Takes First Steps To Overhaul H-1B Visa That Tech Companies Use To Hire Internationally (geekwire.com)

President Donald Trump's immigration authorities are moving to enact broad changes to a visa that allows American companies to bring international workers to the country. From a report: On Friday, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and the Department of Homeland Security released a proposed rule that takes the first steps toward overhauling the H-1B visa. The new rule would prioritize applications for workers with advanced degrees from American universities. The policy would also change the application process companies go through when they want to secure H-1B visas for foreign talent. Instead of completing a petition for the new employee, companies would register for free online to enter what's been described as the "H-1B lottery." Immigration law caps the number of regular H-1B visas that can be awarded each year at 65,000. An additional 20,000 may be awarded to workers with master's degrees and PhDs. Under the new system, USCIS would review all applications, including those for workers with advanced degrees, during a registration period before the actual petitions are filed.

252 comments

  1. Orange Man Bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    I'm sure this is some insidious plot by Orange Man to appease his Russian overlords.

    1. Re: Orange Man Bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Orange man dumb...

  2. divide and conquer by trumpai · · Score: 0

    Notice problem with numbers? About 100K H1B-ollywood non state actors playing "survivors" of zombie apocalypse. You know they have brains unlike all the brain dead american zombies. Similar story with diversionary lottery - so called green card. They say they pick 100K winning entries even though 50K of them get granted real green cards. Similar story with other immigration visas: pick a letter of alphabet no soup for you. You know if you add the numbers - every year there are probably million or two new immigrants arriving in USA. In ten years it's about 10% of USA population and that is only talking about "brainiacs", top bracket - 6 figure jobs, etc.. It doesn't make any sense. It's not a country. It's al-qaeda base of tar budgets. Notice how shit martini stirrers drop letter "A" out of "USA" when talking about their interests. It's as if they don't want to be caught lying. So they use this new "object" that doesn't exist: united states. Notice its as if there is higher level entity called "united" that is at the same time while "stating" something it also is involved in "kingdoming" and "nationing" and all kinds of other endeavors.

    1. Re:divide and conquer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Notice problem with numbers? About 100K H1B-ollywood non state actors playing "survivors" of zombie apocalypse. You know they have brains unlike all the brain dead american zombies. ...

      Says the knucklehead who's never had to deal with, "I have written a code..." monkeys...

    2. Re:divide and conquer by trumpai · · Score: 0

      Says the knucklehead who's never had to deal with, "I have written a code..." monkeys...

      well, word "deal" is also word that is widely used in no business like business of tar budgets that doesn't leave any imagination stone unthrown into glasses of scattered castles. You know gambling, casinos, cute story about MIT black jack team, cute story about rainman handling seaorg truth handler, even cuter more recent story about zuckerberg talking about upcoming commercialization of telepathy, shine on you crazy redrum, etc.. So no deal. In other words narratives about "code writers" is fiction. You know like that story about millions of open sesame street wise monkeys banging randomly on typewriters producing daily millions of works of shakespeare in all languages of the world.

  3. So... by sit1963nz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The alternative is to set up software hubs in those other countries.
    It will be just like hardware really, the design, testing, etc etc will be done in the USA, but the construction is done overseas.

    Over all it will not see much change in the number of US citizens employed in the USA, it will mean that those H-1B jobs simply get filled overseas. The US government looses the income tax paid, and other countries benefit. Long term, the knowledge and skills that gets transferred to another country will improve the knowledge and skills available in that other country, success breeds success. It could see even MORE US jobs going.

    Capitalism is a wonderfull thing, it means the USA can get their shoes cheaper, but it also means companies will seek lower wage economies.

    There is no law to say USA wages must be higher. Competition is a double edged sword

    1. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it will mean that those H-1B jobs simply get filled overseas

      We've tried that - its called offshoring, and the quality of stuff they churn out sucks a fatty

    2. Re:So... by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 4, Funny

      Competition is a double edged sword

      We are talking nerd jobs so it's more of a bat'leth. (adjusts pocket protector)

    3. Re: So... by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      You don't want tax revenue running around loose now do you?

    4. Re:So... by jeff4747 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That already exists, and is called "offshoring". It tends to not work all that well in practice.

    5. Re:So... by sit1963nz · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That was said about Japanese cars too.

    6. Re:So... by sit1963nz · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Neither did Japanese and Korean cars and electronics. Things change, especially when time and investment are made.

    7. Re:So... by jeff4747 · · Score: 2

      Are you under the illusion that offshoring is new? Or that billions have not been spent trying to make it work?

    8. Re:So... by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 5, Interesting

      There is no law to say USA wages must be higher. Competition is a double edged sword

      This is exactly correct. Instead of pulling other countries up, we're pulling our own country down to their level. A race to the bottom only benefits corporations, not workers. The solution for this is to place taxes on goods made by workers paid less than 95% the average wage in the US. The idea is to effectively make the cost of labor closer to being flat. This will raise the standard of living for workers in other countries significantly while preventing using it as a wage suppression tactic.

      Competition only works if the wages are comparable. The current disconnect in wages has allowed rampant exploitation.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    9. Re: So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It is working in the metric that management measures; short term costs reduction. Nobody in charge cares about long term impact to software quality or customer base.

    10. Re:So... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Or a three edged sword.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    11. Re: So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      International workers unions could help but I doubt they would be allowed to grow to any significant size.

    12. Re: So... by sit1963nz · · Score: 2

      No, the rest of the world knows there is nothing inherently "great" about the USA or its products.

      Other countries can and do catch up and surpass the USA.

    13. Re: So... by jeff4747 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Until the project rockets past the deadline and the cost overruns start piling up. Then they call it "re-shoring" and bring it back to the US.

      (Then 5 years down the line, management has been replaced due to turnover, and the new management has the brilliant idea of offshoring the work again)

    14. Re:So... by Babel-17 · · Score: 1

      Lol, true! Alternatively: Nerd jobs, so it's "Competition is a three edged sword". :) https://memegenerator.net/img/... https://www.youtube.com/watch?... Or there's "On one hand competition is good, on the other hand it can be bad, but on the gripping hand ..." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    15. Re:So... by sit1963nz · · Score: 1, Informative

      And for countries that lack automation, they could place a tariff on US made goods so the same number of man hours is accounted for.

      And for the countries that do not apply tariffs on each other, trade between them will flourish.

      Trump if anything has shown that trade dependancy on the USA is a dangerous thing and that other countries must broaden their trading partners. This has reduced the impact the US economy will have in the rest of the world, and has reduced the influence the USA can exert.

      The countries are listening to Trumps words with "no deal is better than a bad deal".

      This trade war is one the USA is loosing.

    16. Re:So... by sit1963nz · · Score: 1

      Are you under the illusion it can not work ?

      Software as an industry is still young, but the entry costs are rapidly falling.
      Development boards are now throw away items they are so cheap.
      Compilers are free

      The barriers to teaching , learning, and entry are practically gone for software development.
      The advantage the US once had where they could afford the tools has gone.
      Open Source software has also supplied a free example of code to learn from
      The people who had been gaining experience under the visa schemes go back to their own countries taking the skills they learned with them

      Off Shoring can and will work long term.

    17. Re:So... by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

      "You" are pulling other countries up though. Salaries in India are expected to grow by 10% next year. Reasonably competent tech talent costs roughly similar amount almost anywhere nowadays, crazy bubbles like SV excluded. Like you can't get a programmer for $100/month even if that's the typical salary in whatever 3rd world country.

      And if you make labor costs flat across the world artificially, developing countries would no longer have any competitive advantage and would find it much more difficult to grow.

    18. Re: So... by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1
      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    19. Re: So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Theres a huge difference. Japanase car companies are making decisions in japan, with development in Japan.

      With software, the company makes a decision in the US ans ships the idea overseas. Theres a huge amount of time lost finding out what they developed last night.

      Even if quality is 100% the same or better, they can't make up for the agility because people need to sleep.

    20. Re:So... by SirAstral · · Score: 1

      "Capitalism is a wonderfull thing, it means the USA can get their shoes cheaper, but it also means companies will seek lower wage economies."

      This is non-sequitur, capitalism has NOTHING to do with this problem as it can exist in any economic model. Capitalism simply uses the resources it is allowed to have by the Government, in this case, foreign workers. It is also not necessarily cheaper. The purpose is to drive down wages so that they can get the better talented Americans to work for less and businesses will definitely spend MORE for a short time to accomplish that goal for the same reason a business will operate at a loss in an attempt to destroy a competitor. I have seen a lot of terribly paid and highly paid foreign workers!

      "There is no law to say USA wages must be higher. Competition is a double edged sword"

      But there could be a law. Sometimes there is no telling how an action you take could wind up coming back against you with more force than than it took to start it. There are so many ways things can help or hinder your efforts. "Double edged" does it no justice.

      There is ZERO reason to have an H-1B visa program like this for a developed nation. There are MORE than enough talented workers available and able to work these jobs and workers in the industry know it! It would however make sense for an under-developed nation to do this until their own workforce is able to compete.

    21. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever seen "Cream" by David Firth?

      Every time I hear a good idea like this, I think of the generic suited rich fucks all over the world who'll pick up a phone and say "No" to it.

      Nothing's going to change until people stop mentally imprisoning themselves and realize the world can be whatever they make it, as soon as they get rid of those who are interfering from above...

    22. Re:So... by plopez · · Score: 1

      Wages should be hire for *everyone*. Impoverishment of everyone, in the US or overseas is flat out wrong esp. when profits are soaring and wages in real terms are dropping. To think otherwise is unethical and immoral.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    23. Re: So... by plopez · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Throw in language, cultural, and quality of education differences and the savings are illusory.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    24. Re:So... by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      "You" are pulling other countries up though. Salaries in India are expected to grow by 10% next year.

      Yes and think of how much faster we'd pull them up if they were paid 95% of what Americans are paid? At the same time, we wouldn't be dragging the US down. It's a win-win. The only people that lose are the cheapskate bosses.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    25. Re:So... by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      And for countries that lack automation, they could place a tariff on US made goods so the same number of man hours is accounted for.

      You have misconstrued the purpose. The purpose is to ensure workers (regardless of country) are paid fair wages. Automation however cannot (and should not) be stopped and will continue to eliminate jobs.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    26. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what tariffs are for.

    27. Re:So... by sit1963nz · · Score: 1

      Peak US wages was in the 1970's. In reals terms US wages have been falling since then.

    28. Re:So... by sit1963nz · · Score: 1

      See you think it's just about wages. Why can it not be about economic advantage. Why should a worker in a poor country be disadvantaged simply because they can not afford automation. ?

    29. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. Worked with many companies that tried that, and the employees we hired in other countries were all terrible.

    30. Re:So... by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      See you think it's just about wages. Why can it not be about economic advantage.

      If any country wants to put a tax on automation, that's their prerogative. It's not logical to do so since automation makes things cheaper while still enabling workers to be paid a fair wage but it's still their prerogative. If you want to argue in favor of it, be my guest.

      Why should a worker in a poor country be disadvantaged simply because they can not afford automation. ?

      Automation only exist because it's less expensive than paying people. Your premise that they cannot afford it implies they would pay workers less than the cost of automation which is already less than what we pay workers for the same job. Really this brings us right back to the issue of wages. Ensure they must pay the workers a comparable rate and then they will choose automation because it will be the cheaper option.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    31. Re: So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If work can be moved overseas, it's being done. Companies have had outsourcing and overseas options for decades. It's like companies complaining about the minimum wage saying it is a job killer. That would mean companies run on too many employees now with a cushion of unnecessary employees. That's bunk. They have as few people as they can now and push work overseas if they think they can possibly do it now.

      Moving overseas, though, complicates some matters. Not just the different time zones, work ethic and ability, culture and local politics volatility and a lack of basic reliable electricity and so forth is a factor. If an employee steals. The laws are likely not to be as tough as the us in enforcement. Yes. Oddly enough. Also the placement of patent and copywriting and intellectual property laws vary with the us having the strongest.

    32. Re: So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IWW has been an FBI front organization for more than 50 years.

    33. Re: So... by astrofurter · · Score: 2

      "This trade war is one the USA is loosing."

      Wrong. Not "is losing" - rather, "has already lost, badly".

      Many parts of America are in a 40+ year economic depression. Entire industrial sectors have totally collapsed and disappeared. We LOST the trade war. In no small part because our rulers sold out their own countrymen for private gain.

      America has NOTHING to fear from ANY trade war. There is literally no way it could make the American economy worse.

      So we say to China, to India, to Europe - BRING IT! You have everything to lose and we have nothing to lose. We are sick of one-sided trade that hugely enriches your bourgeoisie while driving American workers to destitution.

      The trade war is on, and we're gonna win like you wouldn't believe.

    34. Re: So... by sit1963nz · · Score: 2

      No, you have lost simply because of time.

      The USA did not have to completely rebuild after WWII, unlike all of Europe and Asia. The USA was able to sell stuff that the world needed, an in the 1950's the USA accounted for 60% of the entire worlds GDP. The World then required the USA.

      By the mid 1970s the rebuild was done, world manufacturing, food production, etc etc was producing surplus so the other countries traded among themselves, leaving the USA out of the loop. This trend has simply continued. Currently the USA is about 19% of the worlds GDP, and all other things being equal will get as low as 4% (the US population being 4% of the world population).
      The rest of the world is competing, that's all that has happened. And that trend will continue to happen.
      Technology has become cheap, no longer do you need to run underground cables for telephones, a shipping container flown in can have a remote town with cellphone coverage up and running in days. Computers are cheap, ebooks are cheap, information is cheap.

      The US needs to come to terms that it is not number 1, nor is it irreplaceable, this is simply a fact, ANYTHING the US makes could be sourced from elsewhere, sure there may be delays until production meets demand, but it can happen. And its the same with software, the tools are free, the skills transportable, and if the reports of chinese hackers are not over blown, China has those skills already.

    35. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah and you're full of shit. A ton of those H1b jobs are filled out by outsourcing companies. Those jobs would not exist outside the US and are filled basically by fraud, putting Americans (usually ones so old they cannot hope to get a similar paying job) out of work.

      To the extent we're sending geniuses back to China to build competing companies, well that's the whole point of this overhaul. To put more certainty in this process and favor the retention of American graduates rather than letting any dickwad who cheated his way through some foreign university come over and displace an American doing an honest job.

    36. Re: So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [citation needed]

    37. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Japanese manufacturing is Japanese jobs.

      The problem is capital seeking safe tax harbors, cheap terminatable labour and lootable environment, which destroys local economy, health and environments.

      Captcha: depleted

    38. Re:So... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Not sure how you could enforce that, how are you going to monitor wage levels at factories in other countries? And at what point in the supply chain do you monitor? If one resistor is made by a low paid person does the whole iPhone get hammered with the tax?

      And what about robots? They get paid $0.

      The only way to compete is to offer something different. Local service, higher quality, expertise and experience. Build up working relationships. In my industry you can buy the same stuff from China for a fraction of the price, but good luck getting phone support at 3 PM on a Tuesday or reporting issues directly to the engineering staff.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    39. Re: So... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      You didn't lose a trade war, you failed to adapt.

      When motorcars became popular the buggy whip manufacturers regarded it as a trade war. They tried to get rules and taxes imposed to make motorcars less attractive, but it didn't work and they went bust.

      The world is constantly evolving and there is nothing you can do to stop it.

      The solution is to help people adapt, to re-train and get new jobs, and to encourage creation of those jobs. Unfortunately helping people directly like that is un-American, it looks too much like welfare and socialism. In America you have to make rich people richer in the hope that they employ those people, e.g. by propping up their failing outdated business.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    40. Re:So... by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

      Competition only works if the wages are comparable.

      In order for that to be possible, the production quality, turnaround times, and productivity levels, among many other factors, of the different workforces in question must be roughly comparable. That is nowhere near true at this point in time. The actual value labor produces varies widely among workforces in various parts of the world and also depends on the particular labor type, all for a whole host of reasons.

      Ycu cannot pay a man more than the value his labor produces and call what you're doing a business, that's charity.

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    41. Re:So... by ghoul · · Score: 1

      The only reason wages are higher in US is during the early 20th century USA was the Saudi Arabia of the world and made a shitload of money from exporting oil. Not every country is sitting on an oil bonanza. Countries will try to use their competitive advantages. One of them can be that their workers are willing to accept a lower lifestyle and hence lower wages

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    42. Re: So... by astrofurter · · Score: 1

      Get real. The question is trade agreements. Absolutely agreed, the world keeps changing. However I find that a poor justification for economically suicidal trade policy.

    43. Re: So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It isn't currently working now, so please tell us, how in the future it plans to get better? Because your post is filled with "offshoring is new, it's the future, because I say so"

      You sound clueless as fuck by the way.

    44. Re: So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Offshoring are for shortsighted managers trying to meet their budget while seeding incompetence in the ranks, which results in gradual decline in productivity and effeciency; numbers look great tho, and managers get bonuses. By the time it all blows up, theyâ(TM)re long retired. Smart!

    45. Re: So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The USA did not have to completely rebuild after WWII, unlike all of Europe and Asia.

      Even a single counter-example disproves an 'all'.

      'all' of Europe and Asia did not have to rebuild after WWII. Some major industrialized nations, such as Sweden (who supplied huge numbers of ball bearings - a critical industrial component used in almost all systems involving rotation - to both sides during the war), took no damage from the war. Switzerland is another example.

      Others took damage, but not that much, or ended up stronger then they had been despite taking damage.

      Britian, for example, was economically far stronger at the end of the war then it had been at the beginning. The Germans did not have a strategic bomber force, and their tactical bomber force did not have the range to reach most of Britian (and were extremely vulnerable to fighter intercept within their range). In these more distant areas in Britian, an enormous number of new factories were built during the war (providing much needed and long-overdue modernization), and many new people were trained in the skills needed for industrial production (including many women who hadn't been working outside the home before the war).

      The British threw away the advantages gained during the war with their descent into socialism post-war (which didn't get reversed until the Thatcher era), but had they not done this they could have been an economic powerhouse after the war. The fact that they drive on the wrong side of the road didn't help: it's a decision that makes it harder to compete in the auto market, and makes the cost of cars higher, affecting almost every business in the country - a huge net economic disadvantage. They also had a big problem with keeping old Victorian-era attitudes towards business and education, which didn't adapt well to the modern world (Corelli Barnett).

      The USA, on the other hand, reversed it's pre-war drive towards socialism with FDR's death: his successors didn't have the political power to continue (and many of FDR's policies were dismantled, including some of the most economically harmful policies).

      Finally, large portions of Asia either were not affected by the war, or were made stronger by it.

      In short, there are many counter-examples to your 'all'.

      Also, the 'rebuild' was done for most of Europe (excluding the Eastern block nations) by the early 1950's, which are now viewed as an economic Golden Age in those countries.

    46. Re: So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Culture is a factor. In the rest of the world the customer is not #1. It shows.

    47. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bat'leth's don't have two edges. duh.

    48. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like this although I always though tariffs should be based on freedom democracy and rights. Stuff from europe, canada, australia, korea, japan would get less tax while china, russia, middle east would get more in most cases. Also some sort of origin mechanism so items do not get laundered through a lower tax country.

    49. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except the Japanese are competent.

  4. Good! Too many caste members here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Badumbum.

  5. It's a start by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But companies should not get any part of the service for free. And they should pay a tariff for using foreign labor.

    1. Re:It's a start by sit1963nz · · Score: 1

      And to the 96% of the worlds population that are NOT US citizens, they consider US labour foreign, should all US exports also get a tariff on them ?

    2. Re:It's a start by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what if the US company buy some complex system from a foreign company and it needs to be setup? There are industries where US has no (top) players, you know.

  6. Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought he was evil and Google was good?

    1. Re:Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If that is his plan then yeah he is fucking evil, or at least stupid.

    2. Re:Trump by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Not today. Please come back tomorrow, we might have it fixed by then.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  7. Some reform, not enough by bobstreo · · Score: 1

    Instead of completing a petition for the new employee, companies would register for free online to enter what's been described as the "H-1B lottery."

    For Free? Just No. It's not like these companies aren't making money hand over fist providing indentured employees to US companies. With enough applicants, we could pay off the National Debt.

    This isn't powerball.

  8. Large amount of H1Bs by BrookHarty · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I worked at ATT Wireless when number portability was released, and people could finally switch cell phone providers and keep their number. The VP of finance fired the entire department running the software/services and brought in Mindtree (i think) to replace the workers. He had a couple hundred H1B's working months in advance of the migration.

    The Migration failed horribly. ATT Wireless missed the deadline, hundreds of people lost their jobs, and ATT wireless couldn't enact number portability quick enough and was fined millions of dollars a day.

    My engineering department was moved into the same building as the H1B's, and it was a nightmare. I've worked with H1B's over the years, but never experienced the mess of the restrooms and building. Working at other companies with H1B's and Indian Nocs, and no issues, so no idea why ATT and Mindtree was so horrible. My experience with H1B's have been mixed, some cheap companies pushing Cisco certified engineers who didn't even know how to use SSH to talented skilled programmers who became citizens. So I do think some H1B's are being used as an excuse that no US workers can be found, theres always unemployeed looking for work, when I know some engineers who took 3-6 months, and a Storage engineer who took a year to find a storage architect job. YMMV.

    Also up here in Seattle, there are entire blocks of apartment buildings around Microsoft that Indian consulting companies rent out, and put 3-5 H1B's to an apartment, they live dirt cheap, its rather depressing to see how they live. Its not like theres not enough engineers around this area, we have Amazon, Google, Facebook, ATT, TMobile, Verizon, Apple, Blackberry, Tableu, and a zillion other tech companies here. Lots of us citizens looking for work. Last time I needed a job, I just posted what I wanted on craigslist in internet jobs, and had a recruiter calling me with what I wanted. But I admit I'm lucky, I had telecom experience in a telecom town.

    So is cleaning up H1B abuse good? Sure. Companies posting for database admins with 10+ years experience, programing, and paying 7 dollars an hour, so they can post "cant find any workers!" to hire H1B workers, is a scam. And that should be ended.

    Also, I like the 20K for PHD/Masters H1B, those people will demand high wages, and should help boost up wages for everyone. (I hope)

    1. Re: Large amount of H1Bs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I won't drink the in-office coffee - some of the H1Bs don't believe in washing their hands after using the restroom, even after dropping logs - they do sometimes make the next batch of coffee

    2. Re:Large amount of H1Bs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your comment on H1B apartment living made my day. It's like that here in Denver tech center. Lots of folks from India in my apartment building, all tech workers and family. Nice people, but clearly being used. Modern day indentured servitude.

    3. Re: Large amount of H1Bs by BrookHarty · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I was speaking too some of the H1B engineers and the said the company they worked for had mandatory hygiene classes. The more American H1B's that lived in the western countires tended to not have the hygiene issues. The restrooms where so bad at ATT some people filed HR complaints, that's why we got moved out of the building after a few months, the employees would refused to use shit covered bathrooms. ATT was the only place I worked at that like that, at many companies never experienced or seen that again, but I've heard others mention the hygiene issues with some H1B's. So Dont judge all H1Bs, and this was many many years ago.

    4. Re: Large amount of H1Bs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our apt is similar. The Stinkdus and their barn animal families pack and ruin everything around them. They are loud smelly people with little sense of hygiene. They have no respect or decency for anything that's not them. They run around in shit smelling packs with their little breeder goat wives and screaming crotch spawn. I've seen them playing cricket in the parking lot around other people's cars.

      They're horrible to be around. Worse than a cockroach infestation. You pretty much have to gut and rehab any place they've ever lived.

    5. Re: Large amount of H1Bs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I will remain judgmental of the H1Bs that I described

    6. Re:Large amount of H1Bs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Companies posting for database admins with 10+ years experience, programing, and paying 7 dollars an hour, so they can post "cant find any workers!" to hire H1B workers, is a scam. And that should be ended.

      That's just your fantasy. When a company applies for an H1B visa it has to provide the prevalent wage in the industry, which is certified by the Dept. of Labor, and it can't offer a wage less than the prevalent. So the safeguards already exist, and if they aren't enforced now, then there's no reason why the reformed law would be enforced either.

      I am former H1B recipient (now a U.S. citizen), and I personally went through the process multiple times.

    7. Re: Large amount of H1Bs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should see Irving Texas, it's practically fucking India. Like 5 assholes cram into an apartment and sleep on the floor. Employers of h1bs should be shot and killed

    8. Re: Large amount of H1Bs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stinkdus. You type the truth my friend

    9. Re: Large amount of H1Bs by ghoul · · Score: 1

      Shit covered bathrooms is not an H1B problem. Its a Janitorial problem. Probably a Union Janitorial shop.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    10. Re: Large amount of H1Bs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pray tell, why I've never seen this problem in a BUSINESS setting then? And why I've only ever witnessed it where there are India workers?

    11. Re: Large amount of H1Bs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LUL.

      You are cute if you think they are following the rules.

      Why do h1b1s get paid like shit then? Please explain that to us.

    12. Re: Large amount of H1Bs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shit covered bathrooms is not an H1B problem. Its a Janitorial problem. Probably a Union Janitorial shop.

      Other than low quality gas station restrooms, I'd never seen shit covered bathrooms until the Indian H1Bs showed up. It's so bad here that the janitors have to clean the bathrooms 2-3 times a day.

  9. Cheeto haired snide re-tard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As much as I hate his Cheeto haired snide fucker, Good on him for doing SOMETHING.

    1. Re:Cheeto haired snide re-tard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, he's making adjustments to H1B's while at the same time making good use of H2B's at Mar-a-Lago.

  10. Re: Those workers are needed. by cyber-vandal · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Cheaper is the word you're looking for. You can't put "works harder" on the balance sheet.

  11. Re:Those workers are needed. by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    All of them?

    You should 100% staff with brahman, it's what you deserve. Enjoy them delegating their work back to you.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  12. Re:Those workers are needed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've seen their work. I've fixed their work.

  13. Re:How're "ORANGE MAN BAD" idjits gonna respond? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hate him, but I agree with this.

  14. Re:How're "ORANGE MAN BAD" idjits gonna respond? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a trap. Xenophobic Trump is setting up the new system so that the government can drag their feet on reviews. The end results is more denied applications, and potential more that just "time out" before they can get reviewed. Call it a "soft" lowering of the quotes.

    Don't let the biggest liar in D.C. pull the wool over your eyes. This allows Trump to enact retribution on Silicon Valley for failing to fall in line under him. Trump only respects loyalty to him, and nothing else matters.

  15. Here's a better reform by jeff4747 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Don't hand out the visas in a "lottery". Sort the applications by salary. Start handing them out for the highest-paid workers, and work your way down.

    If you really can't find these workers in the US, you'd be willing to pay more to import them.
    If you're just looking for cheap bodies, well you're gonna end up towards the bottom of the list and not get any visas.

    1. Re:Here's a better reform by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      make the prevailing wage 100k (adjusted for cost of living) and let H1B's switch jobs if they get a better offer.

    2. Re:Here's a better reform by mobby_6kl · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The lottery is a horrible idea in general, it encourages "consulting" companies to try bring in as many as possible interchangeable people but then if you need a specifically skilled person, well good luck, your'e now competing with 10k applications from those body shops, where they don't care which specific ones do get through.

    3. Re:Here's a better reform by dcollins117 · · Score: 1

      Great. Who makes lists? Let's just use the one Santa uses. It already shows who's been naughty and who's been nice.

    4. Re:Here's a better reform by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      My company has about 50 employees, and 4 are Indian nationals that finished masters of electrical engineering degrees in the US. We are sponsoring two this year, and at least the third next year. Salary is at worst competitive with a US citizen, and given the visa requirements is likely to actually be higher.

      Of the four, one is exceptional, one above average, and the other two it is too early to tell. After spending 12-18 months training them, in what way is it rational for them to be pushed out of the country? FWIW, these are power systems engineers, and not software developers, and while we do get ~5-10 similar applicants for each US-born applicant, we simply don’t get enough us-born applicants to meet our hiring needs.

    5. Re:Here's a better reform by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      Do you have even the slightest idea of how a company gets an H1B visa for a worker?

      Part of the process is telling the government 1) you want one. 2) how much you will be paying the H1B worker.

      Golly.....it's so difficult to figure out how someone could come up with a list!

    6. Re:Here's a better reform by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      we simply don’t get enough us-born applicants to meet our hiring needs.

      First, the employees you describe are not eligible for an H1B visa. They have to be out of the country at the start.
      Second, why are you only doing an H1B visa? It's temporary. Sponsor them for a permanent one so you can keep them after you've trained them.
      Third, as I said in the first post, if you really can't find the workers in the US you should be willing to pay more than someone looking for the cheapest labor. Which means you get those H1B visas and the cheapasses don't.

    7. Re:Here's a better reform by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Sort the applications by salary. Start handing them out for the highest-paid workers, and work your way down.

      You've just promoted one industry over another in your immigration system without fixing the underlying problem.

      If you really can't find these workers in the US, you'd be willing to pay more to import them.

      That's not the problem you just solved. All you managed to do is ask for foreign saw mill workers to be paid as much as low undercut foreign doctors.

    8. Re: Here's a better reform by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems like a good idea. Where I live it kind of works like that. The company I work for used this to get some people that were (almost?) impossible to find locally, and their salary was quite high.

    9. Re:Here's a better reform by ghoul · · Score: 1

      The problem with that is California and New York would get as many visas as needed while Austin, Raleigh or Denver companies would not get any. The alternate is to have a salary range depending on the local salaries and that is what is in place today

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    10. Re:Here's a better reform by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      In my specific industry, “paying more” really is t an option when we compete with companies with much higher margins (we are at about 60% gross and 10% net margin). Our competitors for the exceptional people have 100-300% gross margins, and we can’t get by on slightly above average.

      Sponsorship for a permanent visa takes years, which is why companies like our use H1B as a bridge for a candidate. Your info about transferring visa types might be out of date with more recent policy changes.

    11. Re:Here's a better reform by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      That's not the problem you just solved. All you managed to do is ask for foreign saw mill workers to be paid as much as low undercut foreign doctors.

      First, I have a very hard time believing you can't find US-born sawmill workers.

      Second, supply-and-demand. If the position is cheap, then there's many qualified people, and it's not that hard to find a US-born worker. If you can't find one at the wage you are trying to pay, supply-and-demand still applies. Pay more.

    12. Re:Here's a better reform by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      The problem with that is California and New York would get as many visas as needed while Austin, Raleigh or Denver companies would not get any.

      Not hard to fix. Multiply the salary by a cost-of-living index.

      Also, in Raleigh we're getting paid like we're in California. It's quite nice.

    13. Re:Here's a better reform by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Salary is at worst competitive with a US citizen"

      No it's not! You just benefitted from artificial and inorganic growth in the labor market.
      These people were trucked in here and only did their masters here.

      They were not trained at any spectacular tech company. If these people were not here and ready and willing to work, you would have to pay someone 1.5x their salary (say potentially) by poaching from facebook and apple.

      In india these people would make maybe 500 - 2000 dollars per month max.
      So no, in any reasonable hypothetical situation, an American citizen when poached from another company would have wanted his or her weight in gold. You did depress wages and your new hires are complicit in it.

    14. Re:Here's a better reform by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      First, I have a very hard time believing you can't find US-born sawmill workers.

      I have a hard time believing you actually took me literally while so grandiosely missing the point.

      Second, supply-and-demand.

      Let me stop you there. Supply and demand are great things when the sum total of the supply side and the demand side have identical characteristics in each of their respective resource pools. When was the last time you went to a job interview and were presented with one question "Were you born here?" and hired only based on that?

      The point I'm making is that people and jobs have different qualities. Unfortunately for the software industry the quality isn't appreciated which is precisely why there is rampant H-1B abuse, there's a lack of lower quality workers. Now if the software industry and the software industry alone were the recipients of H-1B then your proposal, however roundabout it is would make sense. But the reality is that the in America just like in most Western countries there are shortages in some fields, gluts in another, and abuses in a 3rd, and your proposal serves to completely screw up the industries that actually do depend on H-1B immigration along with multinational companies which use this process for no other reason than to mobilise their workplace.

      I have this argument a few times with nationalists in the country I'm currently living. They say I'm a foreign worker stealing a local job. The reality is I'm a foreign worker bringing a foreign job in locally and helping the economy in the process. I normally finish with a condescending "you're welcome".

      If it were easy to prevent abuse of these visa programs without hurting various legitimate uses of them it would have been done by now. But it's a problem faced around the world. There's improvements to be had in the process sure, but if you think you have a silver bullet, chances are you don't.

    15. Re:Here's a better reform by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not hire a Latino or an African or god forbid a European instead of just Indians?
      hmmmm

    16. Re:Here's a better reform by ghoul · · Score: 1

      They are probably OPT. After graduating STEM students get 3 years of work authorization to get some real industry experience. Many of these Masters students also have experience in India before their Masters so are hired for real work not internships.
      H1B is a bridge. The current wait for a greencard is 15 years for legal Indian immigrants (Its 0 if you just turn up at the southern border but educated Engineers usually have too much pride to use the Democrat Party route). The H1B is for 6 yrs and then if you have an approved GC and are waiting in queue for a quota slot to open up you get yearly extensions.
      If the US were to fix its immigration system and move to a points system instead of a quota system than the H1 would no longer be needed but the Democrats are holding legal immigrants hostage till they get amnesty for illegal immigrants.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    17. Re:Here's a better reform by ghoul · · Score: 1

      Latino countries dont speak English. Europeans dont want to move to the US - the standard of living is better in Europe. Africa education system does not produce as many Engineers.
      if you want English speaking educated Engineers willing to move to the US in large numbers its India or bust.
      Enjoy this bonanza while it lasts. Eventually India will catch up and people will stop wanting to move for the money. Its not a pleasant experience moving countries.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    18. Re:Here's a better reform by ghoul · · Score: 1

      Also what abt other professions like Electrical Engineering or Mechanical Engineering where the salaries are not as high. The H1 is not just a Software visa

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    19. Re:Here's a better reform by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      Supply and demand apply to labor too. If the salaries are currently not as high, then they will rise when supply is less than demand.

    20. Re:Here's a better reform by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      In my specific industry, “paying more” really is t an option

      If someone told you "iPhones cost too much for me to buy one", is your first impetus to start a program to lower the price, or is it to tell the person, "bummer. Figure out how to pay for it."

      Supply and demand aren't just for products. It applies to labor too.

    21. Re:Here's a better reform by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      The current wait for a greencard is 15 years for legal Indian immigrants

      You do realize there are a variety of work visas that are not H1Bs, right? You don't have to go from nothing directly to green card.

    22. Re:Here's a better reform by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      The point I'm making is that people and jobs have different qualities

      No, I got that. And that doesn't matter at all.

      If the thing you are trying to buy is rare, it costs more.

      If the employees you are trying to buy are rare, guess what? They cost more.

      Wages are not set by chiseling them into stone tablets. They are set by what the market is willing to pay, which is based on the rarity of the skillset. When getting an H1B visa, you are inherently stating that these employees have a rare skillset. They are so rare that you have to import them from outside the US. And as stated above, rare things cost more in a functional market.

      I have this argument a few times with nationalists in the country I'm currently living. They say I'm a foreign worker stealing a local job.

      H1B is not bad because of this stupidity. It's bad because the worker is temporary. If these skillsets are so incredibly rare that they must be imported, why the fuck do we want those people to be forced to leave after 3 years? (6 if you can get an extension).

    23. Re:Here's a better reform by ghoul · · Score: 1

      Name one work visa other than H1B that a student graduating with a Masters from a US university can use. The US just is not very open to legal immigration. Illegal immigration on the other hand is very welcome by both Democrats (it lets them play identity politics) and Republicans (lower costs of labor for small business owners)

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    24. Re:Here's a better reform by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I agree, but you miss the point. When you upset the balance of supply and demand you end up with stupid crap happening. This can be seen in every country. For example a classic upskilling for labourers is to study engineering within their discipline. Yet a few years ago I remember congratulating several electricians who just got their degrees only to find out they were disappointed that they wasted their time. They were being paid 3 times as much to crimp wires as they would be to design the wiring for a building due to a local boom causing a massive shortage in electricians. (Sawmill workers paid like doctors).

      Now the problem there is it was causing companies to go under. So what to do? Wait 5 years (3 year apprenticeship + momentum) for the labour pool to balance? Or grant visas to educated and capable people willing to come into the country, and do the said work. Thank god the government at the time did the latter as the imbalance actually killed 2 projects I was working on. Not sure what would have happened if we were stuck like that for another 5 years.

      Yes this was eventually abused, and the department of labour then proceeded to crack down on the abusers (good workplace protection laws in Australia which is lacking severely in the USA).

      Basic macro-economic theory: Swings in supply and demand happen, however they get more severe if you take a market and arbitrarily cut it up (i.e. by national boundaries), and remember importing labour to pay local taxes and contribute to local GDP is favourable to upsetting local market conditions and the negatives effects that come with it (not just expensive labour, or worse performing labour, market depression which comes from volatile cost of supply, ... to say nothing of the inevitable problems with having some expensive people on the books if the market collapses, or if they are being paid more than others).

       

      It's bad because the worker is temporary.

      I think you're seeing this backwards. It's GOOD because it's temporary. The ultimate goal of any nation is to be self sufficient. There are market forces which can correct the imbalance however they take time. A degree and some experience takes longer than an intercontinental flights and some paperwork. Ignoring the abusers, H-1Bs exists to level a temporary situation in a volatile market.

      I don't want to go to hospital only to be turned down by lack of nurses.
      I don't want to go to hospital only to find that it either closed, or that my tax rate increased massively because the cost of care went up.
      I also don't want to go to hospital in 10 years to find it staffed exclusively by foreigners (and dealing with abusers as well as limiting the duration of visas does this).

      Mind you I realise the irony of me saying this despite me living in another country right now on a temporary workers visa, but I do have a sense of nationalism too. I escaped my home country due to the labour market there being saturated on the completion of a major gas exploration expansion. A few years in Europe where I could put my skills to good use was preferable to flipping burgers at home. However as expected the market back home is starting to change again, as is the market here which seems to be getting less desperate for skilled workers by the day.

      These visas have a place in the macro-economic system and a solution to their abuse shouldn't devalue their reason for existing.

  16. The 65k cap is a lie by rsilvergun · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is what I hate about corporate media. They're left on social issue but hard right on economics.

    Companies get 65k H1-Bs every year. Those visas are good for 4-6 years. There's over 800,000 H1-B visa workers in this country. Most of them tech workers.

    If Trump wants my attention he can start by reversing the Obama era executive order that let H1-B spouses work. That basically doubled the number of H1-Bs to 1.6 million overnight. That would also put upward pressure on H1-B wages since they'd have to pay for a stay at home spouse. He promised that during the campaign. It's been over 2 years and I'm still waiting. And no, the courts don't matter. It's an executive order. If anything the courts would side with reversing it. Obama overstepped his bounds signing the order.

    This same Congress is getting ready to double the number of H2-Bs, by the way. With the help of the Clinton Democrats like Pelosi and Chuck Shumer, I might add. I'm not expecting anything here. Donald Trump's also staffed his admin with the same ex-Goldman Sach's people who've been running the country since Clinton.

    If anyone wants to vote the bums out you'll get your chance in 2011. Show up at your primary. Also, and I know this isn't popular to say, but don't vote GOP. The Dems have Clinton Democrats, and those bastards need to be primaried, but the Dems have a _few_ pro worker folks like Bernie and Liz Warren. Yeah, they won't gut immigration, but birth rates are down, do you really want it gutted? What's gonna happen to your 401k if we're short workers. No, what you want is for some of that money the immigrants are earning to make it to you and your community. The GOP has been pushing trickle down economics again. The Tax Cut Trump did proved that. And it's not working, like always. GOP is out of ideas, Clinton Democrats are out of ideas. Time to give the Berniecrats a go.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:The 65k cap is a lie by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Funny

      If anyone wants to vote the bums out you'll get your chance in 2011.

      Man, I wish I'd seen your post sooner! Now it's too late...

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    2. Re:The 65k cap is a lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vote for the Berniecrats if you want to turn the US into Venezuela. Before any idiot votes for a Berniecrat or other socialist they should be required to live a year in a country that has enacted the stupid policies they advocate.

    3. Re:The 65k cap is a lie by wonkavader · · Score: 1

      You're right that this makes more workers and that should be commented on an counted. But it's important to let the spouses work legally because THEY ARE GOING TO WORK. If we don't encourage them to work in a form where we can get income tax, they'll just work in the cash-only economy. This makes us more money. But clearly, that should be part of the announced numbers and is not.

    4. Re:The 65k cap is a lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're not Left on social issues. They are "divide and conquer" on social issues and they couch it as social justice so that folks who don't think too deeply about it/are too distracted will get behind it for the Good Feelz.

    5. Re:The 65k cap is a lie by vakuona · · Score: 1

      If Trump wants my attention he can start by reversing the Obama era executive order that let H1-B spouses work.

      That's just a cruel thing to do. It is rather more honest to just not allow people into your country. When countries accept immigrants, they should accept them properly, rather than create second class residents.

    6. Re:The 65k cap is a lie by BeemanIT · · Score: 1

      You haven't been reading the news have you? https://timesofindia.indiatime...

    7. Re:The 65k cap is a lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "Berniecrats" are just fine with H1Bs and have never to my memory said a word against it. The identity-politics aspect overrides whatever economic sense they may have.

    8. Re:The 65k cap is a lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Trump wants my attention he can start by reversing the Obama era executive order that let H1-B spouses work. That basically doubled the number of H1-Bs to 1.6 million overnight.

      According to a report issued by the Congressional Research Service, the total number of dependents granted work authorization from May 2015 (when the rule was implemented) to December 2017 was 126,853, a number which includes renewals.

      Source:Work Authorization for H-4 Spouses of H-1B Temporary Workers: Frequently Asked Questions, page 4, at https://fas.org/sgp/crs/homesec/R45176.pdf

      Both this report and USCIS' own website state that there were only 90,946 work authorization approvals of H-4 workers once renewals are removed from this figure (an H-4 visa holder is a spouse or child of an H-1B visa holder; not every H-4 visa holder has work authorization).

      Source: https://www.uscis.gov/sites/default/files/USCIS/Resources/Reports%20and%20Studies/Immigration%20Forms%20Data/BAHA/H-4-EADs-by-Gender-Country-BAHA.pdf

      I think the idea that every H-1B worker has a family member authorized for work is a common misconception. Many H-1B workers are single. Some have spouses that don't wish to work. Even if every spouse did want to work, the regulation allowing them to work is limited only to the spouses of H-1B workers who are changing their status to lawful permanent resident (green card) status. This requires sponsorship from an employer and can take years depending on the country the worker comes from.

      If you disagree with the program, that's fine, but it is helpful to use accurate numbers. I don't think people realize just how small the number of dependents with work authorization really are, so people come up with numbers that far exceed the reality of the program.

    9. Re: The 65k cap is a lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are sort of wrong about h1b being effective for 6 years. If they file for a green card, the h1b can stay here as long as the application takes. There is a wait of decades if you are Indian. So effectively you are wrong - these 65,000 a year, many stay for decades so the growth is exponentially high.

      I dont buy that all these top companies cant find talent. I know of people who would move across the country to work for Microsoft or any big name and they are as good as most h1bs. Hell. Microsoft hires h1b to do clerking, meanwhile lay off us citizens first.

      I bet most people commenting here are white or Asian dudes.

      No one has commented on the EEOC. if they hire h1b, they can discriminate. They can hire a whole department that is one gender, one race, one religion. If they hired a department of all one kind of citizen, it would be evidence of bias for a discrimination case. When h1bs began in the 90s, the momentum of improving numbers of blacks and women ranked. But as dudes here, you dont even know the best argument against them.

    10. Re:The 65k cap is a lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With only Two Choices, what will Game Theory dictate?

    11. Re:The 65k cap is a lie by ghoul · · Score: 1

      65K *6 = 390K. Where do you get your 800K numbers unless you are counting the folks whose Green cards are approved but not issued due to the racist rules in place saying that only the same no of cards can be issued to 1 Billion Indians and 1 Billion Chinese as issued to 100000 Croatians?
      Stop the racism in Immigration rules and you will se the H1B number fall to 390K.
      The spouses allowed to work are those whose green cards are approved but waiting for a priority date. For Indians and Chinese that can be 15-20 years. No educated woman wants to be a housewife for 15-20 years.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    12. Re:The 65k cap is a lie by bad-badtz-maru · · Score: 1

      Towards the end of the article it suggests that there will be additional upcoming legislation targeting the H-4 (H1B spouse) work visa.

    13. Re: The 65k cap is a lie by ghoul · · Score: 1

      You are sort of wrong about h1b being effective for 6 years. If they file for a green card, the h1b can stay here as long as the application takes. There is a wait of decades if you are Indian. So effectively you are wrong - these 65,000 a year, many stay for decades so the growth is exponentially high.

      I dont buy that all these top companies cant find talent. I know of people who would move across the country to work for Microsoft or any big name and they are as good as most h1bs. Hell. Microsoft hires h1b to do clerking, meanwhile lay off us citizens first.

      I bet most people commenting here are white or Asian dudes.

      No one has commented on the EEOC. if they hire h1b, they can discriminate. They can hire a whole department that is one gender, one race, one religion. If they hired a department of all one kind of citizen, it would be evidence of bias for a discrimination case. When h1bs began in the 90s, the momentum of improving numbers of blacks and women ranked. But as dudes here, you dont even know the best argument against them.

      When H1B started you started getting Alphas into Software. Earlier it had been a field for nerds but in India its the alphas who go into software (sports is just not big there). And the Alphas COMPETE. No longer was a software a touchy feely nerdish backwater where you could dump quota hires. And lots of Indian women work on H1s and lots of different religions too so no longer could you cry diversity. The entitlement narrative of whaa help me I am a minority or whaa help me I am a woman does not work too well when minorites of race, color and religion (Indians are all three) are competing and crushing it. All that is left is coming to Slashdot and whining.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    14. Re:The 65k cap is a lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those visas are not good for 4-6 years. I'll stop reading the rest of your post now.

  17. Re:FROM PRISON?!?? by ravenshrike · · Score: 1, Interesting

    That you find Trump jailbait is kinda odd. Are you perhaps used to sexually abusing the membership of an old folks home?

  18. Whoops, wrote 2011 by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    meant 2020. Stupid /. not letting me edit comments.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  19. great way to drive education cost for US students by kiviQr · · Score: 2

    This is a great way to drive education cost for US students by admitting more foreign students. Expect two mortgages if you want MS degree. If you cared about US workforce you would make sure they can afford education!

  20. Abuse Over by kackle · · Score: 2

    Can be as simple as "Every H-1B must get paid at least double the average American salary." Such a rule could work in perpetuity, too.

    1. Re:Abuse Over by gravewax · · Score: 1

      That would actually be far smarter than this fucked up braindead system they have come up with.

    2. Re:Abuse Over by Kohath · · Score: 1

      TFA mentions that pay rules will be part of a separate regulation, planned for the future.

    3. Re:Abuse Over by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      So much for the idea of smart people coming to contribute to America's greatness. It's amazing how many of the Slashdot armchair proposals include a method which relies fundamentally on manipulating a factor that is far removed from the factor of interest (local jobs).

    4. Re:Abuse Over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would really need to be double the salary typical for that region for that profession with the same qualifications.

      However what i think might work better is that they have to have done their due diligence in hiring an American all throughout the USA and include the same kind of relocation resources to potential remote American employees as they do the foreign employees.

      Cause this is the thing, yes, I'm certain it's hard to find local talent in Silicon Valley. But I'm certain if you searched nationwide and offered new hires reasonable relocation assistance, that you could find zillions of Americans.

    5. Re:Abuse Over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They could start by enforcing the laws we have now and punish companies that blatantly doge the regulations. Remember when Disney came out and said they were "replacing" their US workers with H-1b? You are supposed to prove that you tried to hire local and couldn't . I once had to make a job description and essentially create requirements that only one person could fill including experience in one of our legacy systems no one outside the company would have .

    6. Re:Abuse Over by ghoul · · Score: 1

      No. We try this all the time. Americans dont want to move to Silicon Valley and move into a 800 sq feet apartment when they can live on a split level ranch house in the Souteast, midwest or Texas. They are only interested in moving to the valley to work at the hot startups and the hot technology where they can have an equity event and eventually be able to buy a house. For every one job working on a hot startup or framework there are 10 jobs writing code to put up a website to sell a gadget. These jobs are skilled jobs but for the skill needed people can lead a much better lifestyle outside Silicon Valley. Only those who dont have a choice (immigrants) will pick up these jobs hence the preponderance of H1Bs in these jobs in the valley.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    7. Re:Abuse Over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better idea; Don't hire them altogether. Every company using H1Bs is guilty of H1B visa fraud. The biggest sign is asking for five years experience with a two year old technology. If you see this, it's hib visa fraud

  21. 20k for PHDs is just a trick to raise the limit by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    You'll notice it's an _additional_ 20k. They'll use diploma mills to get the workers they want. Meanwhile your wages and mine will drop.

    Also, it's not 20k _total_. It's 20k this year, 20k more the next. The work visas are good for 4-6 years at least. There's already over 800k H1-Bs in this country. Why do you think it is you can't turn your head in STEM without seeing them or that they're having to cram them 5 to an apartment?

    I don't think any abuses are going to be curtailed. It's going to get worse, but since Trump ran on cutting these abuses he'll have his media engine push that narrative to us tech workers. As always, watch carefully what they _do_, not what they say. I keep repeating this, but Trump still hasn't made good on his promise to revoke Obama's executive order allowing Spouses to work...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:20k for PHDs is just a trick to raise the limit by BrookHarty · · Score: 1

      I experienced that with some cisco engineers who really had no tech background, had the paperwork, but couldnt do basic works. We had to fire that H1B Indian NOC and find a different one. We also had to ask basic tech questions of engineers to make sure they could do simple things like SSH. How one gets a Cisco certification and not know how to ssh smells like fraud.

      I was hoping the 20K would be from accreddited not paper mills. South America is trying to steal doctors from other countries for kinda the same reason, its gotton so bad, Cuba wont let doctors travel with their families, because they wont come back after a better life and not kicking pack a large part of your pay.

    2. Re:20k for PHDs is just a trick to raise the limit by ghoul · · Score: 1

      India should start the same system. For every H1B the companies should have to pay Indian govt 20000 USD for the cost of the education as most good colleges in India are govt funded. That would really make it clear who is doing who a favor in the H1B game.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
  22. I don't think that would work by rsilvergun · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Average American makes $51k/yr. And that's the Average, it's much higher than the median Even at $102k/yr you're getting a steal. H1-Bs are already trained, are trained on a specific tech, are completely disposable and work 60-80/hr/week without complaint.

    Make it 4 times the Average and you might have something, but then we'll have to fight to keep them from redefining "Average".

    It's like Wargames, the only winning move it not to play. End the program. If we need them here they can immigrate, just like everybody else. No more temp workers.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:I don't think that would work by dgatwood · · Score: 2

      It would have to be double the median full-time wage for a given job category within a given region of the country. That would be much harder to game.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    2. Re:I don't think that would work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Average American makes $51k/yr. And that's the Average, it's much higher than the median

      There are many different types of "average". In the context of a statement in the form "The average person makes $x per year", the average IS the median.

    3. Re:I don't think that would work by kackle · · Score: 1

      It's like Wargames, the only winning move it not to play. End the program. If we need them here they can immigrate, just like everybody else. No more temp workers.

      I guess in the end I agree.

    4. Re:I don't think that would work by ghoul · · Score: 1

      If you got to pay an H1B twice a local hire than the local hire will ask for twice the local salary as else it would be discrimination in salary based on national origin and if the local hire is getting paid twice the salary than that becomes the base and so you have to now pay 4 times to an H1B and then again you are discriminating and so on....

      See where I am going? Its basic logic and logic is very important in programming. And you wonder why the companies need to import coders if this is the result of the US education system?

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
  23. Re:great way to drive education cost for US studen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And having to get a MS just to get into the door. It hpepened in other professions. My physical therapist buddy had to get a PhD because that was the new standard. My NP wife may have to get a PhD because....they want to limit the supply of nurse practitioners. The public reason is to "offer better care to the patient."

  24. Re:FROM PRISON?!?? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    jailbait

    I think we found the person who's responsible for Lemonparty...

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  25. Re:Those workers are needed. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    For very variable definitions of "better". Do they work longer? Sure. Do they work harder? Quite so.

    Both means jack shit. What I care about is "do they produce better products". Which they ain't.

    In other words, I prefer a worker that works for 3 hours and slacks off for 3 before going home early and gets the job done to one that slaves away for 16 hours and THEN I have to put the other worker down for his 3 hours tomorrow to fix that rubbish.

    I need results. Not hours.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  26. Him and what Congress? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Yeah, didn't think so.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  27. Re:How're "ORANGE MAN BAD" idjits gonna respond? by atrex · · Score: 0, Troll

    Well, software engineering isn't really something that you have to be on site for. If tech companies are restricted from hiring the staff they need and can't otherwise fill the positions then they'll move their headquarters overseas. In other words, restricting these visas will have the same net effect as Trump's tariffs. Some jobs will indeed go to American workers like the 600 steel workers being hired for a new plant. But that isn't going to outweigh the number of jobs lost as companies move overseas. Ex: GM closing 5 plants and cutting 15,000 jobs.

    Side note: watch how Mar-a-lago either gets an exemption from any restrictions on hiring foreign workers or how no changes are made to the H1-A visa program.

  28. Re:How're "ORANGE MAN BAD" idjits gonna respond? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    He doesn't get credit for recognizing an OBVIOUS problem. And once again, all he is doing is telling people what they want to hear.

    The real problem isn't even bringing people HERE to work. It's companies laying off U.S employees only to replace them with workers in places like India and now Africa.

    I mean, just how stupid is this trump guy? And worse, just how stupid are the morons who follow him?

  29. Let 'em by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    we have immigration enforcement for a reason. Deport both when the spouse is caught.

    And it doesn't make me a dime. That money doesn't get to me. Whatever they pay in taxes I lose in tax cuts to the wealthy. Until we get politicians who stop pushing Trickle Down economics and that Job Creator Bullshit lie then it really doesn't matter to me. I don't care about the economy at large. I care about _my_ economy. The working man's economy.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Let 'em by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude - stop lying - you're not a working man - you're a bought and paid for leftist troll. "Eeew, don't vote for Trump or the establishment Democrats - vote for Berrneeeeeeee he cares" Yeah, that's a load of bullshit you're sucking down and sellling.

    2. Re:Let 'em by eaglesrule · · Score: 2

      we have immigration enforcement for a reason. Deport both when the spouse is caught.

      You are exactly right. The sooner that the Justice Democrats which you constantly advocate for stop their campaign to dismantle ICE, the better. It's hard to take them seriously as a viable party when they take these kind of moronic positions.

    3. Re:Let 'em by ghoul · · Score: 1

      You do realize that the only reason Social Security is still solvent is because of immigrants. H1Bs pay into social security but get nothing back. As soon as they lose their job they need to leave the country so they cannot claim unemployment. if they get sick and disabled and cant work they need to leave the country and cannot claim disability. To get retirement benefits you have to pay in for 10 years and H1Bs are for 6 years so they get to pay in but never get to get any benefits.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
  30. Makes Sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's actually a very reasonable proposition. Rarer talent is generally more expensive, and this will fix the abuse cleanly while meeting the intent of the system. If congress requires it to be a lottery, then assign e^salary lottery tickets to each request.

  31. Almost there by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 2

    Now make it an auction instead of a lottery...

  32. Re:How're "ORANGE MAN BAD" idjits gonna respond? by mnemotronic · · Score: 4, Funny

    How are all the ORANGE MAN BAD!!!! idjits going to respond to this?

    I'm grabbing popcorn!

    Great idea. Personally, I have a Masters in Pomposity and Self-Righteousness, plus a Doctorate in Grandiosity and Self-Aggrandizement, all by mail, all from Trump University, and all signed by The New Messiah, our Great Leader, The Donald Himsef.

    --
    The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
  33. Re: Those workers are needed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Twice the hard, half the quality. Now please do the needful!

  34. Re: How're "ORANGE MAN BAD" idjits gonna respond? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fake news keeps saying H1B is for high skilled immigrants when in reality it's just for temporary workers. Fake news lies alot.

  35. Re:How're "ORANGE MAN BAD" idjits gonna respond? by Kenneth+Stephen · · Score: 2

    This is only true for certain types of work. If there is a substantial stream of work that can be transferred offshore_in its entirety_ including the subject matter expertise, then all that work can be performed remotely. For anything else, a local presence is required. Either to accept the iterative knowledge transfer from the local SMEs, or so that the work can be performed locally under supervision. If this isn't done, then delays, misunderstanding, and other screwups will contribute to a greatly increased failure rate.

    --

    There is no such thing as luck. Luck is nothing but an absence of bad luck.

  36. This would be simple to implement by lamer01 · · Score: 1

    And it would be quite accurate as well. The government already knows what we all make. They don't have to depend on the sweat shops to come up with the numbers.

  37. This is not going for small businesses though by lamer01 · · Score: 1

    They would not be able to compete with the googles and microsofts of the world in price. But, Should we care about them or about the actual industry that is being gutted by the influx of cheap labor? I say no.

    1. Re:This is not going for small businesses though by tempmpi · · Score: 2

      I'm not completely sure about that. Even with a rather small budget you can still pay very high salaries for some positions. There are also huge differences in productivity and hiring a small number of highly paid, but also highly productive engineers can be a good strategy. If you pay 200k to a highly skilled engineer who is easily performing work that normally would require 3 average engineers with 120k each, than that 200k salary is cheap and not expensive.

      --
      Jan
  38. Re:How're "ORANGE MAN BAD" idjits gonna respond? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do you assume bigotry?

    Is it the responsibility of the US to make sure that people from other nations advance?
    Or is it ( supposed to be ) the responsibility of the US to ensure that people from the US do well?

    The H1B program harms US workers, lowering wages.

  39. Re: How're "ORANGE MAN BAD" idjits gonna respond? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lolzercakes.

    Offshore workers are terrible when product decisions are made in the U.S.

    You have a full 24 hour cycle before you realize what changes were made last night.

    Oh, and those changes were wrong? Time to wait another 24 hours. Hopefully the fixes are right.

    Compare that to a U.S. company where decisions and development happen realtime.

    Offshore can't compete.

  40. Re:How're "ORANGE MAN BAD" idjits gonna respond? by Freischutz · · Score: 1

    How are all the ORANGE MAN BAD!!!! idjits going to respond to this?

    I'm grabbing popcorn!

    I don't think the ORANGE MAN is bad, I do, however, think he is dumber than a bag of hammers.

  41. + cost of living so about 300k+ starting in bay ar by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    + cost of living so about 300k+ starting in bay area

  42. Re:How're "ORANGE MAN BAD" idjits gonna respond? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 0

    How are all the ORANGE MAN BAD!!!! idjits going to respond to this?

    Idiot or not, you have to admit, the Orange Man is pretty fucking bad. Historically bad. All-time bad. The kind of bad that will be the stuff of jokes for decades upon decades to come.

    Here, check out this video of Vlad Putin and the butcher prince from Saudi Arabia dapping each other up at their good fortune at installing such a weak dog as president of the United States.

    https://twitter.com/NBCNews/st...

    That little bro-five says more about the Trump presidency than anything else.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  43. Thank You Trump!!! by BeemanIT · · Score: 1

    Actually sense the Trump administration has been in office many H1B visas are being denied. I believe this aided myself into getting the new position I received in my company and my company is looking to hire more local talent as well. I've seen a lot in the news and Indian news about how H1Bs are becoming harder or getting rejected due to companies not paying enough or the skill isn't really that much of a specialty. This is one of the things I can say I'm happy the Trump Admin is enforcing.

    1. Re:Thank You Trump!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a moron who doesn't know sence from since. Trump will hang.

  44. Fuck H1Bs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These highly educated folks need to be given GREEN CARDS and encouraged to emigrate permanently to the US. Mitt Romney was right about this. H1Bs just serve to depress wages.

  45. YES! PLEAAASE throw us into that briar patch! by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The alternative is to set up software hubs in those other countries.

    Then watch your cutting-edge company dull and rot, as the 10-minute turnaround time for Q-A turns into one day due to the near-half-day time offset.

    (It's especially a scream to watch management try to use Agile techniques across a 12-hour offset and a giant culture gap, too.)

    And that's assuming you find exceptionally competent help. (Hint: There ARE really competent engineers in, say, India. But they're pretty much all employed, and paid substantially more than the bulk of the body-shop fodder which are most of what you get now.)

    One way to solve the time gap issue is to move the whole operation, including architecture, design, and admin, offshore. But then your IP is over there and NOT over here. If they're not competent you're left with restarting from scratch or an older snapshot when you realize they've blown it (and you're now months or years behind in the race to the window). If they ARE competent, watch for them to quit and start their own company (with your IP, under their IP laws and (non-)enforcement), leaving you in the same position but with a new competitor.

    Even with engineers of ordinary competence and the project split across the pond, offshoring can be of negative value: Your designer spends a bunch of time breaking off a chunk to be done overseas, then ends up doing the work himself anyhow, when the module doesn't arrive in time. So the added worker cost both his own pay plus a bunch of the time of the local guy on the critical path without any benefit from his work product.

    The invisible hand will get around to swatting the company - perhaps into the dustbin of history. But that takes some time.

    = = =

    But, speaking of the invisible hand: I'd like to see if we can get its input.

    A company "needs" a foreign talent? It's not just using H1Bs to get cheap labor? OK. Then the talent is worth a lot of money, and should be paid it, right?

    So lets try this:
      - A cap on the number of H1Bs, some number N.
      - And each year they go to the N candidates (or as renewals for those already here) being paid the highest salaries (with preference to those already employed in case of ties.)

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  46. Re:How're "ORANGE MAN BAD" idjits gonna respond? by Kohath · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Maybe you don't understand why he's bad. Here's the list of bad things he did:

    - not a good talker
    - caused people prone to hysteria to become hysterical
    - prompted people who hate him to get really angry
    - made the news media sad
    - ???

    Maybe some policy stuff too. Perhaps someone could make a substantive list.

    Clearly budget deficits haven't gotten better, for example. Some people like to say those matter — mostly when their side isn't spending the money.

  47. Re: How're "ORANGE MAN BAD" idjits gonna respond? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like him (more than Hillary) but I dislike this. It's too many. Divide the numbers by 10 then I'll be on board.

  48. I didn't mention Justice Democrats by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    in my post. Are you stalking me? Cool, I got my first stalker!

    Anyway, I'm not opposed to killing ICE. Like I said above, We already have immigration enforcement. ICE was created _post_ 9/11. And like the patriot act that freaks me out. I can't help but wonder why we didn't just put more money into existing structures. To be blunt, it makes me wonder if ICE is going to turn into the American Version of the SS.

    Here's a crazy thought about The Wall: What makes you think it's there to keep people out? Germany had one. They used it to keep people _in_.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:I didn't mention Justice Democrats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's true. Even the Nazis wouldn't build a wretched thing like the Communist Berlin Wall. Remember how they shot people trying to leave? That was good for the "collective".

      Anyhow, capitalism came and destroyed it, then sold the pieces for souvenirs as a final insult to the commies,

    2. Re:I didn't mention Justice Democrats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If an H1B is abused, let the H1B report it and get to stay for the rest of the term if the company is convicted. Fine the company a million dollar per incident over and above any criminal charges.

      Boom, problem solved. Americans don't really care if smart, well paid people come here. What we care about is when those people are underpaid/paid in US residency and that undercuts our own wages. The brain drain is great for the US overall. But when those "nominally well paid for industry average" employees are worked 2x overtime, that undercuts the native workforce.

      Same thing with illegals picking fruit. Fine the company that hires them/and the companies that hire those subcontractors to try to dodge blame. We don't just arrests hookers, we arrest the pimps and john's too. Why don't we arrest the companies creating the demand for this substandard work? Oh yeah, Republicans only want to say they oppose illegal immigration, they're fine with them being abused - which leads to poor people who happen to be white to get passed over for economic development.

      Funny how that works. Let's see what happens next year.

  49. Re:Those workers are needed. by plopez · · Score: 1

    Having worked with H1Bs and overseas I have never met people who put in more hours, worked longer hours, were better educated, and more dedicated than workers in the US. Europeans are probably second, then the Chinese I interacted with, and dian the bottom of the barrel. Though the Indian women I met were often pretty sharp.

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  50. This does not fix the fundamental problem by plopez · · Score: 1

    Which is H1Bs are fundamentally indentured servitude. An H1B cannot pursue better paying jobs. Even if they pay their own shipping costs. This is a way of destroying free market forces and creating a captured labor market.

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    1. Re:This does not fix the fundamental problem by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      That isn’t true— while the company has a tiny bit of power, the employee has full freedom of movement.

    2. Re: This does not fix the fundamental problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Bullshit, they have to find a new sponsor or leave the country in six months.

    3. Re:This does not fix the fundamental problem by GhostBond · · Score: 2

      They do not at all. I work with some people who have HB1 visa's and they are terrified of being fired. It's difficult to find a second employer. As you get anywhere near the end of the visa it gets even worse as who want to hire someone who might be forced to leave in a year? It's not quite slavery but it is indentured servitude. It creates an entire second-tire class of people who are easier for their employer (or their contracting company) to take advantage of. In Roman slaves were a big issue because they could get fairly intelligent and educated greek slaves and that was cheaper than hiring people. So the common roman couldn't find a job because a lot of them were being done by slaves, at the same time being able to work as a slave sucks to. It just sucks all around.

    4. Re:This does not fix the fundamental problem by ghoul · · Score: 1

      Indentured Servitude is as American as you can get. Most of the white folks in America had their ancestors come over for 7 years of indentured servitude ( and of course the blacks came over in lifetime indentured servitude). its called paying your dues. h1Bs pay their dues before they get their green cards and hence appreciate American citizenship a lot more than those who are just born into it.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
  51. Sure you can by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    you can measure the hours they work and how many lines of code their write. I know /.ers like to bang on about code quality, and yes that matters in some places. But in a lot of place it doesn't. The phrase "Code Monkey" exists for a reason.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re: Sure you can by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      The words "lines of code" will not be in the annual financial report. The words "reduced labour costs" will be. Whether the workers are better or not is irrelevant to that mindset.

    2. Re: Sure you can by ghoul · · Score: 1

      Just because you pay more for something does not make it better. American workers paid 3 times of what workers are paid in India can be just as shit.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
  52. This is obvious bullshit on the face of it by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    it costs a ton to bring an H1-B here. On top of that it's much, much cheaper to pay them in their home country. If businesses could offshore these jobs they would. Sometimes you just need people on site to collaborate. Yahoo, for example, learned that the hard way.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:This is obvious bullshit on the face of it by sit1963nz · · Score: 1

      And all the US manufacturing job that went to Asia learned a different lesson.

      Software is a skill that can be learned and that skill can be used in any country in the world.

      It is simply US arrogance that keeps it believing that only the USA can produce good software. I am sure the US manufacturing sector had exactly the same views back in the 1960s and 1970's.

      Yahoo also had that view, they were too big, too important, too special to fail.

    2. Re:This is obvious bullshit on the face of it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with you that there are those outside the USA can produce good software. I think the disconnect here is that typical management in the USA thinks that *cheap* labor outside of the USA can produce good software, which - in my experience - is incorrect. The cost savings of offshore software development have dwindled to almost nothing yet some management persists in believing that offshore development is cheaper.

    3. Re:This is obvious bullshit on the face of it by ghoul · · Score: 1

      The lesson to be learned here is that Software development as a industry needs to move to India. H1Bs are a band aid to try and force software development to stay in the USA but ultimately it needs to go. As a country gets richer people want to have easier and easier lives and send the difficult jobs away and software development is one of the few difficult jobs left in the US. Everything else pretty much does not need a brain or a work ethic.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    4. Re: This is obvious bullshit on the face of it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you fucking talking about?

      You are all up and down this thread in favor of taking American jobs away because you think America is too cocky? We are GIVING those jobs away. Make no mistake about it. It's a gift. Because it makes the stock holders more money, but in the long run you end up with shit software.

      What US arrogance? Where have we collectively said that the US produces the best software? No one is saying that.

      What we are saying is that offshoring software to other firms in India, etc, has been anything but the best. Right now offshoring software is a shit show. You pay for what you get, shit code.

      So fuck off with your strawmen about the future of offshoring. We don't want your shit code or shit workers. Thank you. (Our bosses do tho)

    5. Re:This is obvious bullshit on the face of it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah because Indians consider H1Bs as the Indians only visa. Fuck India.

    6. Re: This is obvious bullshit on the face of it by ghoul · · Score: 1

      I have used many pieces of shit code written completely in the US. WHether code is shit or not is not a function of the location in which its written. Its a lot more complex than that.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    7. Re:This is obvious bullshit on the face of it by ghoul · · Score: 1

      It pretty much is. Most other countries folks can come work in US on E2 and E3 treaty trader visas. The only countries which need the H1 are India and China. The rest may use it as the H1 allows you to get a greencard and settle while the E2 does not but its not the only choice for folks from say Bangladesh or Pakistan.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
  53. Not just wages by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    living and working conditions. India has a massive number of people with food insecurity. This results in much cheaper labor because they're literally fighting for their lives. You can't compete when there's that much inequality.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Not just wages by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      I agree that poor working conditions should also be taxed the amount that would be needed to raise them to suitable levels. Then we turn around and use the money from the tax to hire Indian workers to improve the conditions.

      Living conditions is highly complex and more due to low wages, so boosted wages themselves may solve the problem.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
  54. Re:YES! PLEAAASE throw us into that briar patch! by sit1963nz · · Score: 1

    You do understand that 60% of the worlds population lives in Asia, not the USA (only 4%)
    There is also Europe to consider.

    You do understand that delays TO the USA are just as long as the delays FROM the USA.

    Sorry, but the USA is NOT the centre of the universe. And more and more US corporations are earning more from the rest of the world than the USA, the US has become a secondary market. The real consumer growth is is Asia, not the USA.

    But keep believing what you believe, it will then come as a rude shock when software goes the same way as manufacturing.

  55. Tax every H1-B $1000 a month for wage equity. by SysEngineer · · Score: 1

    Most American students leave university with 10,000 to 80,000 worth of student loans. While many H1-B workers total university cost is $8,000. A $1000 per month tax would put H1-B workers that same economic parity as American workers with student loans. And maintain a higher wages engineers have work hard for. If companies really want good talent then they should pay for it. The employer should pay some and the H1-B worker should pay some.

    Right now America is "out sourcing" education. It is cheaper to hire a H1-B than to provide a good education to Americans at an affordable cost. Corporation out sources manufacturing overseas starting in the 1980s and look how that turned out. Just think of the problems in 10 years if education is out sourced today.

    1. Re:Tax every H1-B $1000 a month for wage equity. by ghoul · · Score: 2

      H1Bs already pay a 1000$ a month extra in tax. Its called FICA. They pay Social Security, Medicare, Disability taxes bt are not eligible to claim any of it. As soon as they lose their job or get disabled they have to leave the country. How do you think SS is still solvent? All the projections done in the 80s said SS would be insolvent by 2000 but the H1 boom of the 90s added billions to the SS fund with zero outflow or future liability.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
  56. Idiot racist Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All of Trump's policies center around some imagined fear of losing a racial majority sold to him by White nationalist Nazis. I can't wait until people grow up that realize this race shit is nothing but a myth told by old people and weak politicians trying to get some support.

  57. Bullshit by Camel+Pilot · · Score: 1

    You are trying to gaslight us all...

    In 2018 (and 2017) all H1B Visas were fully filled just like any other year for the last 16 years.

    https://www.forbes.com/sites/s...

    What has changed is that the number H2B Visas where expanded by 20K positions between 2017 and 2018... gotta have low paid grounds keepers... you know at private Golf Clubs and such.

  58. Re:great way to drive education cost for US studen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    False. Most foreign students pay the full cost of tuition. They do not get discounts from in-state tuition at public schools, they do not get Pell grants, and they do not get subsidized student loans. Typically universities make a profit from foreign students. The profit is used to reduce the cost of education for local students.

    While the advertised tuition rate may rise if H1-B increases the demand for a particular degree, the discounted tuition paid by domestic students can actually decrease because of the increase in profits from foreign students.

    The cost of education is increasing partly because low birth rates and high employment are lowering enrollment. In the north east US, smaller universities need to bring in international students or close down.

  59. Re:great way to drive education cost for US studen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "great way to drive education cost [down] for US students"

    International students don't pay the same tuition as domestic (in public schools, (most) private don't differentiate); they pay three to four times what a domestic student pays. State and public schools have one rate for residents, about 1.5x to 2x for out-of-state non-resident students, and 3x or more for international. The foreign students are subsidizing the US students.

  60. The EEOC gets lost with h1bs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No one has commented on the EEOC. if they hire h1b, they can discriminate. They can hire a whole department that is one gender, one race, one religion. If they hired a department of all one kind of citizen, it would be evidence of bias for a discrimination case. When h1bs began in the 90s, the momentum of improving numbers of blacks and women ranked. But as dudes here, you dont even know the best argument against them.

    1. Re: The EEOC gets lost with h1bs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If one were to blow up Citibank it would be nothing but stinkdu particles blowing in the wind

  61. Re: How're "ORANGE MAN BAD" idjits gonna respond? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whatever it takes
    . Anyone who employas h1bs should be shot and killed.. except for doctors

  62. Re: How're "ORANGE MAN BAD" idjits gonna respond? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    True

  63. Re:How're "ORANGE MAN BAD" idjits gonna respond? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Personally, I have a Masters in Pomposity and Self-Righteousness, plus a Doctorate in Grandiosity and Self-Aggrandizement, all by mail, all from Trump University, and all signed by The New Messiah, our Great Leader, The Donald Himsef.

    I feel a great disturbance in the derp, as though millions of Progressives looked at Trump's picture and suddenly realized it was a mirror.

    (Hint: Democrats aren't liberals, never were. They're authoritarian progressives, also known as communists, and always were... and they haven't been this pissed off since the Republicans took their slaves away.)

  64. Re:How're "ORANGE MAN BAD" idjits gonna respond? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He is guilty of the one true high crime: opposing Democrats.

  65. Re: How're "ORANGE MAN BAD" idjits gonna respond? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Awesome! The OWNERS of Surveillance Valley are evil sacks of shit. Whatever is bad for them is good for the American people.

  66. Re: How're "ORANGE MAN BAD" idjits gonna respond? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Orange man bad!!

  67. Re:How're "ORANGE MAN BAD" idjits gonna respond? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Weak dog? Go provoke him, and then come show us your ass without teeth marks in it.

    I'll give you dog. Most human beings are, at the end of the day. He's anything but weak.

    It amazes me how many genuine negative traits the Lefties are ignoring, in favor of conjuring up fake ones, in the vain pursuit of justifying their frothing hatred and bigotry toward white people. Maybe ranting and raving like racist assholes just feels good?

    Or maybe they know, for all the stupid things he does, that he actually isn't any of the things they're preprogrammed to hate... besides white and successful?

    Meh. I've had enough. Will someone please lead the lemmings to their cliff already? We should have put 'em down when they fought back about giving up their slaves. It was obvious then that they'd never come to anything good.

  68. Re: How're "ORANGE MAN BAD" idjits gonna respond? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go home, nazi asshole. No one wants to hear your bankster-approved talking points. No one believes your lies.

  69. Re:How're "ORANGE MAN BAD" idjits gonna respond? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    Weak dog? Go provoke him, and then come show us your ass without teeth marks in it

    https://www.newsweek.com/trump...

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  70. Re:YES! PLEAAASE throw us into that briar patch! by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    Sorry, but the USA is NOT the centre of the universe.

    So what? The rest of the world is welcome to try to develop and sell its own high tech, just like we did.

    Meanwhile, the USA is where *I* live and work now. So foreign-worker laws, their interpretation and enforcement, along with management and investor fads, all matter to *MY* bottom line. Especially when I have founding stock options in a startup but not enough clout with the C-suite to keep them from committing corporate suicide.

    For non-founders, though, the H1B system, as currently practiced, is the hi-tek white-collar version of the blue-collars' "undocumented laborer" problem, where imported workers with shaky legal status that keeps them from demanding legally-mandated working conditions (and other issues) results in not just depressing the wages of the citizen-worker competion, but drives things SO low that, without government enforcement, employers have the choice of hiring illegals or becoming so uncompetitive that they go out of business.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  71. Re:How're "ORANGE MAN BAD" idjits gonna respond? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You need to find a new drug. That's all you lefties can come up with, a "study" that "finds" that Trump appeals to weak men?

    Is there some reason for all this concern about the fragility of one's masculinity? Is there something you need to discuss with your shink?

  72. Good news! by dschiptsov · · Score: 1

    We will work remotely.

  73. Re:How're "ORANGE MAN BAD" idjits gonna respond? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hilarious irony from the party of gays, trannies, and other mentally-ill gender-confused idiots. The same people that need safe spaces from mean words. They set baseline for what being a big delicate bitch looks like IRL. Using the phrase 'masculine fragility' is extra rich, considering how many leftists have had their shit completely removed, exactly like the nullified trash they are.

  74. Re:YES! PLEAAASE throw us into that briar patch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So lets try this:

      - A cap on the number of H1Bs, some number N.

      - And each year they go to the N candidates (or as renewals for those already here) being paid the highest salaries (with preference to those already employed in case of ties.)

    Such an awesome idea! I first thought of it a few years ago, and I imagine others too, it's so bloody simple, and especially far less corruptible than the status quo. It still can be gamed though, by temporarily increasing the salary to get the visa, though I imagine we could add the stipulation that the salary may not decrease. Also, would last year's high salary winners require salaries comparable to this year's competition? If their company no longer wanted to keep up that salary, does that mean the employee gets deported? Finally, to other Americans it may appear as though the "job stealing" foreigner is the one getting doubly rewarded: with a job and a top salary.

    An even simpler system is for the government to simply auction off the fixed number of one year visas. I'm guessing they'll go for somewhere between $25K to $100K. If companies really need the employee, then they will know the extra value they provide to justify the fee. It is very hard to game this visa auction system. The main perceived difficulty, shared with your proposal, is that the high paying professions will get most of the visas. But this auction will have the effect of adding competitive pressure to those top end jobs, which will reduce their stellar salary level ultimately, which some may see as valuable in reducing inequality.

  75. Reversion to Mean by ghoul · · Score: 1

    USA being obscenely richer than all other countries was an anomaly due to WW2 destroying all other major economies while growing the US economy. As other economies have rebuilt and others have thrown off the shackles of colonialism and unleashed there potential a reversion to mean is occurring. there is nothing inherently special about America or Americans. Just because someone wins a lottery and becomes a billionaire doesnt mean their children will continue to be always richer than their neighbors. The neighbors will catch up eventually.

    --
    **Life is too short to be serious**
    1. Re: Reversion to Mean by astrofurter · · Score: 1

      I'm very happy other countries are growing prosperous. However that doesn't mean it's a good idea for the American government to accept trade agreements that are detrimental to the great mass of American people.

    2. Re:Reversion to Mean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      USA being obscenely richer than all other countries was an anomaly due to WW2 destroying all other major economies while growing the US economy.

      This is a myth. It has been debunked many times. Most of Britain - including the industrialized North and West - was beyond the effective range of German air power. Further, huge numbers of new factories were produced in Britian during the war, and large numbers of people (including many women who hadn't been working outside the home before the war) were now trained in the high tech skills needed by a modern industrialized economy.

      The disadvantage of being the first to industrialize also meant that Britian had a lot of old equipment and old plants (many dating back to the Victorian Era). A lot of much needed and long-overdue modernization took place during the war.

      The economy of Britian was in NO sense destroyed by the war, in fact it was stronger then it had been before the war. Britian could have been an economic powerhouse after the war, they simply threw away their advantages.

      Other major industrial powers (such as Sweden, which supplied huge numbers of ball bearings to both sides during the war) came out of the war in an economically healthy state.

      The USA significantly helped other nations recover from the war, in part because to have a healthy economy it needed healthy high tech trading partners (perhaps also to avoid a recurrence of the 1918 plague). This started even before the war was over, and would continue after war''s end with the Marshall Plan. Had it not been for the socialist takeover in the East, all of Europe would have recovered from the war by the mid 1950's, instead of just the major Western powers.

      Further, the USA isn't richer than all other countries. The USA does have as many billionaires as Europe. But this reflects obscene concentration of wealth, thanks to highly regressive laws, deeply entrenched corruption, rent-seeking, huge problems with unethical practice of law, and the negative consequences of the current implementation of patent and copyright law (see The Captured Economy). However, the average US citizen is worse off then the average citizen in most developed countries (which have far better health care and social safety nets, plus better public transportation). That means the USA is effectively poorer than many other nations.

    3. Re: Reversion to Mean by ghoul · · Score: 1

      Agreements are always beneficial to both and detrimental to both. Its called Give and Take. traditionally America has been able to just take given its dominant role in the economy. Now other countries are strong enough to bargain where America has to give something too. Its a new feeling for the baby Boomer generation as they grew up in a time when everyone just had to listen to America. Its no longer that simple. The 50s-80s was an anomaly.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    4. Re: Reversion to Mean by astrofurter · · Score: 1

      "Its called Give and Take"

      Yes. China GIVES suitcases full of cash to American politicians, then TAKES delivery of the machinery and technology that formerly had comprised the American industrial base.

  76. Re:great way to drive education cost for US studen by ghoul · · Score: 1

    Many US students are able to study for free because the foreigners are paying a full tuition (they sell their houses and ancestral properties to pay for an US education) Kick the foreign students out and you will see fewer scholarships for American students. It might not be so bad. Fewer college educated Americans would mean more Americans to do farm labor and we might not need workers from Central America to pick the fruit. The foreigners can just as well spend their tuition money in Europe.

    --
    **Life is too short to be serious**
  77. Re: How're "ORANGE MAN BAD" idjits gonna respond? by Type44Q · · Score: 1

    Democrats aren't liberals, never were

    Depends which definition of "liberal" you use: they're definitely not liberal in the [classic; European] sense. However, ever since the debate over Federalism, the term liberal has nearly the opposite meaning: someone who espouses a "liberal interpretation of the powers granted to the Federal Government by the Constitution" (as opposed to a "conservative" interpretation).

    (The only fuckers on that side were the Connecticut and Rhode banking families that had been allied with the king (Tories) and wanted to subvert this experiment that was so thoughtful to the elite.)

  78. Re: How're "ORANGE MAN BAD" idjits gonna respond? by Type44Q · · Score: 1

    "thoughtful?" I meant "threatening"

  79. You are correct by ghoul · · Score: 1

    USCIS is using frivolous reasons to reject H1Bs. e.g. For a person who has been working a particular job for 5 years, has a Green card approved and getting yearly extensions waiting for a priority date, USCIS is suddenly saying please prove that you are qualified for the job and denying n extension. The guy moves back to Inida and starts working from the offshore office of the client. Over a period of 3-6 months, hiring in that project all moves to offshore and pretty much the project runs from offshore. Since Trump has become president I have seen this happen to 4 projects. About 5 Americans lost their jobs and had to move to other projects within the company.
    So thanks Trump.

    --
    **Life is too short to be serious**
  80. Trump fixed that problem by ghoul · · Score: 1

    Under Trump most transfer petitions are getting rejected so employees cannot move. Trump has been the best thing for Infosys, Wipro and TCS. Every visa rejection means the guy moves offshore and the job moes offshore too. On every offshore position they make 60% margin while an onsite position only makes them 20%. They only staff onsite because the client insists but if a guy has to move offshore the client has no choice. They dont want to hire and train a new guy when the guy moving offshore already has years of knowledge of the project.
    I wonder how much the Indian bodyshoppers paid to Trump's campaign.

    --
    **Life is too short to be serious**
    1. Re:Trump fixed that problem by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      New information that transfer applications are being rejected— that is not what our lawyers are saying.

  81. Visa auction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't understand why they don't offer pool of H1B and let companies bid with the salary they will pay with a minimum set at 80k a year adjusted for inflation. The highest bidder gets the visa if the staff passes background and security checks etc ...

    That's capitalism. Its also a way to stop the body shops abusing the system. If these Indians are so special with such special knowledge not available elsewhere then the recruiting companies certainly can pay special salaries as well. Special salaries also means special tax levies etc ... win win win.

  82. Re:How're "ORANGE MAN BAD" idjits gonna respond? by Luckyo · · Score: 0

    We've finally reached the point where progressives are actually citing feminist studies as citable science. At this point one can no longer deny that progressivism is simply a religious movement that cannot get over its dogma.

  83. Re:How're "ORANGE MAN BAD" idjits gonna respond? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 0

    We've finally reached the point where progressives are actually citing feminist studies as citable science. At this point one can no longer deny that progressivism is simply a religious movement that cannot get over its dogma.

    Here's another study you can try to pretend isn't "citable science" because you don't like the way it portrays you.

    https://jamanetwork.com/journa...

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  84. Re:How're "ORANGE MAN BAD" idjits gonna respond? by Luckyo · · Score: 1

    But does it provide Mein Kampf quotes like the Boghossian's "study" did? Or make complex conclusions about human homosexuality based on dogs fucking in parks?

    You can spam the religious nonsense that is modern grievance studies all you want. All that makes you is that one God freak in the room of atheists.

  85. Re: How're "ORANGE MAN BAD" idjits gonna respond? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Orange man dumb!!!

  86. Re: How're "ORANGE MAN BAD" idjits gonna respond? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You obviously voted for the man. So your opinion is rather tainted as you are a repubtard shill.

  87. `About Time! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    H1-B has well been known as a sweat shop factory enabler, getting people in with little to no skills and paying them minimum wage. Glad the administration is doing something about this scam.

  88. Re: How're "ORANGE MAN BAD" idjits gonna respond? by Kohath · · Score: 1

    Nope. Guess again.

  89. But you are a Justice Dem. by eaglesrule · · Score: 1

    Yes, I too suffer from the urge to start every response with an adhom. :)

    Anyway, I'm not opposed to killing ICE. Like I said above, We already have immigration enforcement.

    Name it, then. The reason ICE was organized after 9/11 was because it falls under the Homeland Security umbrella. They deal with what slips by Customs and Border Protection. Are you suggesting this role be left to the states, which they have no constitutional mandate for, and some actively oppose?

    Here's a crazy thought about The Wall: What makes you think it's there to keep people out? Germany had one. They used it to keep people _in_.

    So did the Chinese. For some reason our rich and elite also prefer to live in gated communities. Also noone is proposing building a wall on our northern border. Why is that?

  90. Re:How're "ORANGE MAN BAD" idjits gonna respond? by mnemotronic · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't know / don't care / voted Libertarian. I guess that opens me up to even more a/c derision. Yippie-kai-yea.

    --
    The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
  91. Re: How're "ORANGE MAN BAD" idjits gonna respond? by TigerTime · · Score: 2

    I'm not so worried about the number however the "auction" method is horrible. It artificially reduces deflates salaries in the US.

    It needs to be an auction method where companies have to pay more to reserve one of these spots. Additionally, they need to be required to pay 1.25x or so more than the national average in pay.

    Instead these H1B lottery people are brought in at bargain basement prices and screwed over by contracting companies. They're typically low level college graduates and severely affect US salaries in the IT industry

  92. Re:YES! PLEAAASE throw us into that briar patch! by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    Such an awesome idea! I first thought of it a few years ago, and I imagine others too,

    I didn't originate it. (Maybe you did. B-) )

    But (like "sealing the dry cell in a steel can to keep it from wrecking the flashlight when the caustic eats through the zinc electrode"), it's "Of COURSE!" once somebody thinks of it and tells others.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  93. Awesome that H1B process is being overhauked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope the new pricess will insust on video interviews of H1B candidates plus require them to pass a âoequalifying for the job âoe exam that is supervised by the u s Embassies in the country of their origin.
    The scam today is that someone gets interviewed and the candidate arrives at work with zero experience or capabilities . Most US managers let this ride instead of dumping the contractor immediately and demanding a new resource from the contracting houses. No idea why. And if a contracting house repeats past 3 candidates as fraudulent dump them too. Watch how quickly they reshape themselves. Instead we have tolerated 20 years of influx with employees training these work visa holders. Ask me, I know!!

  94. What about the models? by ghoul · · Score: 1

    H1Bs are used not just by software engineers. They are also used by fashion models and fashion models are paid a pittance. If you rank it by salary Melania Trump would never have been able to come to the US.

    --
    **Life is too short to be serious**
    1. Re:What about the models? by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      They are also used by fashion models and fashion models are paid a pittance

      There's a variety of visas. Not all of them are H1B.

      Also, the solution to this problem is extremely easy: Pay more. Salaries/wages are not etched into stone tablets. If you can't find a US person, and you end up too low in the list, then you need to pay more.

    2. Re:What about the models? by ghoul · · Score: 1

      You keep posting there are a variety of visas and you are wrong.
      H1B is it. There is no other visa
      L1 is only for intracompany transfers and you cant change employers on an L1.
      E2,E3,TN are only for limited countries.
      H2B is for Farm Labor and seasonal restaurant work.Cant be used by professionals.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
  95. Re: How're "ORANGE MAN BAD" idjits gonna respond? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, sure sucks that the US is a technological world leader and that Intel, AMD, Apple, Adobe, Cisco, Brokade, LSI, HP, Nvidia, etc are bring so much money into the US.

    The Bay Area's economy is larger than the GDP of Switzerland, Poland, Austria, or Sweden. This place could be a significant country. In terms of GDP, Ireland isn't even close to what the Bay Area is today.

    The more you accept that the Bay Area is the Switzerland of the US, the easier this is going to be for you.