Slashdot Mirror


Steam is Finally Coming To China But Chinese Gamers Don't Want It (abacusnews.com)

Valve officially announced this week the arrival of Steam China in Shanghai. But Chinese gamers are telling the PC gaming platform to "get lost!" From a report: One of the most upvoted comments wrote, "Steam China get out of China." It's important to point out that gamers are directing their anger at Steam China, not Steam. In fact, Chinese gamers love Steam... the global version of it, anyway. There are an estimated 30 million Chinese users playing games on the platform -- games which otherwise aren't officially available in China.

But that's exactly why they fear the launch of Steam China, which is a joint venture between Valve and Chinese company Perfect World. Gamers worry that not only will Steam China be a heavily censored platform with a much smaller lineup of titles; worse yet, it might also be the trigger for the government to ban the global version of Steam.

62 of 138 comments (clear)

  1. Not again.... by TAz00 · · Score: 1

    gaben@valvesoftware.com

  2. Wrong problem by mwvdlee · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So the Chinese citizens' solution to stopping government censorship and overreach is to try and get a foreign company to stop a product that works with their government.

    Seems like the wrong target to attack. How about revolting against your government instead?

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    1. Re:Wrong problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      That's not true. Most Chinese I know like their culture and history. Their current government is scary, they know it, and thats just The Way It Is, and they have many friends and family still in China. I asked my ex why there was no change if most people feel repression on some level... She said to me, how can you change the moon? And if you changed it, would it be better? Could you protect your family if the moon fell from the sky? Leave the moon there.

    2. Re:Wrong problem by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Their current government is scary

      I believe this is not a sentiment you will only find in China. It happens everywhere people find out that government isn't really about them, but about what's good for the people in government. Go ask in Venezuela, in Iran, in the UK or even in the US. You will get pretty much that same answer.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    3. Re:Wrong problem by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There are plenty of people here, in our free society, who would not mind some of what the Chinese have. A ban on certain opinions. Bans or controls on addictive substances. Extensive monitoring of public and private life to catch fraudsters and such. A strong authoritative leader. Suppression of certain social groups. Thinkofthechildrenism. No violent video games or movies. Harsh punishment for antisocial behaviour. People have a strong aversion to being controlled, but they just love to impose controls on others.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    4. Re: Wrong problem by peragrin · · Score: 1

      Which is why America some what works. Every few years the core of the government changes. A constant change which then gets stuck doing the same things.

      It is why we need term limits for Congress. To let them be changed more often, and to not let Gerry mandered districts dictate the future.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    5. Re:Wrong problem by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2

      There was a column published in the New York Times that gazed longingly at China and wished they could have the same system here. No messy democracy, no morons protesting, no fake news, just the smart people [Times readers] get to rule society as they see fit. They make the hard decisions that they see as necessary. Decisions we won't like but that someone has to step up and tell us "no". When China decides there will be a road or a bridge somewhere, it just happens. No debate, no citizens council, no environmental impact statements. One can see how elites greatly envy China and wish they could have that here. Oh, the great things they could accomplish without our interference!

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    6. Re:Wrong problem by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because the Communist Party has delivered 30 years of nonstop growth? Things are better every day in China. Revolutions happen when the people are not taken are of, the Communists know this well as it's how they got into power in the first place. People can gripe all they want but the Party is delivering the goods. Who would be insane enough to plunge China into chaos? They did chaos already, it didn't work out well for them.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    7. Re:Wrong problem by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      If they revolt they will be killed or sent to re-education camps. If they just use the US version of Steam at worst one or two of those millions might go to jail and more likely the government will just block it one day.

      Also this is a bunch of gamers, probably lacking much political engagement and given all the bad press about video games in China at the moment probably lacking much public support too.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    8. Re:Wrong problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      My employee ate rats and small birds when he was young.
      Now he has a good job and a stable income.
      He is one of the 800 million China has brought out of poverty the last 40 years. He is also one of the 400 million who has made it into the middle class.

      This is not the generation that will revolt against their government.
      Frankly, the western democracies are closer to revolt than China.

    9. Re:Wrong problem by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      They LIKE their government.

      Something like it happens in Venezuela: it's will call it a 'dictatorship' hurts so many people...

      * just call it authoritarian for now on to let chinese people in in this debate, please
      * the linked article defines sensationalism :/

    10. Re:Wrong problem by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      in our free society

      It's really free? https://www.ted.com/talks/jaro... https://libreflix.org/assistir... https://libreflix.org/assistir...
      * most Venezuelans think they are in a 'free society', so are most Russians and Turkeys, etc...

    11. Re: Wrong problem by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Aren't we all?

    12. Re: Wrong problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Are you an idiot? It doesn't matter which party is subverting democracy...

      Who cares which side of the same coin is cheating with Gerrymandering currently? It needs to stop.

      Fuck Republicans and fuck democrats. Term limits for all government offices!

    13. Re:Wrong problem by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 1

      The nearly 1 million China citizens of Islamic orientation in re-education camps LOVE China. That's why they need to be re-educated.

    14. Re:Wrong problem by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      They did. You obviously do not know about Tienanmen Square.
      The citizen will need time before uprising again.
      Until then, it is best to put pressure on the gov, via the outside.
      Just keep in mind that Chinese gov has loads of ppl that are trolling here and lying to push Chinese gov POV.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    15. Re:Wrong problem by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      ahhh. Somebody that works for the Chinese gov.
      No, the average Chinese does NOT like their gov. They just know that uprising now will not work.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    16. Re:Wrong problem by Luckyo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Most Chinese people in general have no idea about their culture and history because Cultural Revolution has actually happened. I've no idea who your Chinese friends are, but chances are, they're not from actual PRC. As in not even raised there, much less living there, which seems to be what you're implying.

      And there's well in excess of billion of Chinese people living in PRC, who very much support their government in most things, because state propaganda is near absolute.

    17. Re:Wrong problem by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      Go ask in Venezuela, in Iran, in the UK or even in the US. You will get pretty much that same answer.

      {Sesame Street}Two of these things are not like the other ... two of these things are not quite the same ... {/Sesame Street}

      Every place has problems, but no, the UK and US are not totalitarian dictatorships, outside of the fever dreams of overexcited political junkies.

    18. Re:Wrong problem by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      People have a strong aversion to being controlled, but they just love to impose controls on others.

      You've just lumped together (under the general heading of "them") two completely different kinds of personalities with rather little overlap.

    19. Re:Wrong problem by N1AK · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And before you bring up Tianenmen square (which was over 20 years ago) I will just say: yellow vest.

      You're right, I couldn't believe it when the French military opened fire with tanks and killed hundreds of peacefully protesting students in yellow vests on the Champs-Élysées...

      If only the French loved their government as much as the Chinese love theirs, surely then we'd have hundreds of thousands of French people attending *definitely not prisons* education camps to learn to better express that love.

    20. Re:Wrong problem by mlw4428 · · Score: 2

      Well now that your bold claim is in, how about something like evidence to back up your statement? A source? Anything more than your anecdotal response of a highly unlikely article?

    21. Re:Wrong problem by Lothsahn · · Score: 1

      +1

      --
      -=Lothsahn=-
    22. Re:Wrong problem by Solandri · · Score: 2

      The Communist Party has been in control there for 69 years. They're the reason China is so behind the rest of the world. China's growth didn't begin until they got out of the way and allowed capitalistic reforms - allowed people to build and run businesses without Party interference. Giving them credit for the growth is rather like thanking your prison guard for not beating you today.

    23. Re:Wrong problem by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2

      Yes, they are taking the capitalist road to achieve socialism. This was Deng Xiaoping in the 80s. Please do try to keep up.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    24. Re:Wrong problem by fibonacci8 · · Score: 1

      That sounds suspiciously like the premise for Plato's Republic. But with bits about the New York Times added in as a distraction.

      --
      Inheritance is the sincerest form of nepotism.
    25. Re:Wrong problem by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Seriously? You can't imagine Times readers thinking themselves the world's panacea if they were only handed absolute power with no interference from the people? Hell, they jack off to it every day. A government composed of The Smart People in society, empowered to do what they think is right without any restrictions? You really find this unlikely?

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    26. Re:Wrong problem by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      It wiped out enough for overwhelming majority of the culture to have been wiped out. One has to be an incredible apologist for Mao to pretend otherwise.

      It's obvious that Chinese culture will continue to be permeated by the Confucian principles, such as societal harmony. But such base principles permeate all societies of East Asia, and culture is built on top of them. And in case of China, if you want to find Chinese culture, there's really only one place left where it survived. ROC.

      In mainland China, it's post-Cultural Revolution state, where Chinese culture has been utterly eradicated. Whatever remains of it has been utterly twisted and corrupted by Mao's version of Marxism.

    27. Re:Wrong problem by Glarimore · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter what anyone can imagine. You still haven't produced the article in question even after being asked for it.

    28. Re:Wrong problem by mlw4428 · · Score: 2

      Good god. The actual content of your reply is nonsensical and a little fucking batshit insane. Just answer my question so I can do my own research: can you post your source for the NY Times article you mentioned?

    29. Re:Wrong problem by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Well, considering that no one still knows even what the approximate number of deaths has been as a result of Mao's policies, it's rather hard to produce a reliable account that we could evaluate for trustworthiness in the first place.

    30. Re:Wrong problem by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Of course it can change. It was changed completely less than a century ago.

    31. Re:Wrong problem by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Steam is merely a market place. Few people use the Steam extras (voice chat, text overlays) and there is plenty of healthy competition there. But as a market place, big deal, why does it matter if there are fans or detractors? That's like posting an article saying that the Chinese don't like Tesco. As a market place, Steam has a big drawback of DRM (not the same as anti-piracy), not as onerous as some competitors but it's still a drawback.

    32. Re:Wrong problem by youngone · · Score: 1

      DNS-and-BIND is doing the classic right wing trick of pretending the "left" are what the right actually is.
      As everyone knows it's the right that spends so much effort on worrying about everyone's sexual orientation and which toilet they use, but apparently it's the "left" who are the authoritarians.

    33. Re:Wrong problem by youngone · · Score: 1

      ...allowed people to build and run businesses without Party interference.

      You have misunderstood how things work in China.
      Try reading some history books, or even better visit China.
      Talk to a few of the locals, they're nice enough people, and they're always keen to practise their english.

    34. Re:Wrong problem by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      You answered your own question there, if you understand Mao's base tenets and have even a cursory understanding of history of China.

    35. Re:Wrong problem by Cederic · · Score: 2

      30 years of growth out of the last 30 is a good track record.
      https://data.worldbank.org/ind...

      I expect their growth to slow mainly because they're catching up with the US and Europe and growth from there is inherently slower. Whether it's further slowed by a change in Government policy or kept above global averages by those policies is going to be interesting in the next couple of decades. But as I said, I expect their growth to slow from its current rate.

    36. Re:Wrong problem by Cederic · · Score: 1

      this is a bunch of gamers, probably lacking much political engagement

      There are over 550 million 'gamers' in China, but feel free to write them off as inconsequential and irrelevant, instead of the majority of people under the age of 50.

    37. Re:Wrong problem by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      More importantly, they lack political engagement because they're too busy playing games. Take that away and they'll have time to think about overthrowing the party.

    38. Re:Wrong problem by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Gotta say, this is the strangest troll I've had in a while. I'll entertain it for a while I suppose.

      It seems that you're confusing "knowledge of history" with "culture". Direction from former to latter is in fact non-existent. As easily evidenced by the fact that culture existed and was passed down generations when most people were subsistence farmers. By your argument, culture didn't exist until Weimar style schooling system came into existence, or until broadcast television came to exist in each country.

      Now, if we take your argument as gospel truth, you're absolutely correct. Cultural Revolution didn't actually wipe out Chinese culture, because Chinese culture just didn't exist before it, as most people before it were subsistence farmers, like in much of the rest of the world, and as such, had no culture. But as I note above, you argument is utterly absurd on merits, and goes into some kind of postmodern warping of meaning of words to mean utterly different things to justify the conclusion you're heading to.

      And so, I'm done addressing this particular line of trolling. If you have an argument that can work without this grade of BS, make it. Otherwise, head back under your bridge.

    39. Re:Wrong problem by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Gamers who play on mobile phones... Remember that until very recently there was a ban on importing consoles so it was either Chinese domestic ones (mostly knock-offs of 16 bit era or ARM based emulation boxes) or a relatively expensive gaming PC.

      And this population is 30 million, still quite significant but I'm betting that the intersection of gamers using Steam and people politically motivated enough to fight the system is quite small.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    40. Re:Wrong problem by Cederic · · Score: 1

      PC gamers: Wealthier than the average population. More technically proficient.

      That means they're influencers within their social spheres. Family, friends.

      They don't need to fight the system. They just need to mention how shitty it is. Others will fight it for them.

      Plus your 30 million is too low, according to another post further down.

    41. Re:Wrong problem by sound+vision · · Score: 1

      China moved from communism to pragmatic socialism and turned a shithole into a superpower within a few decades.

      It seems that once you get rid of inflexible ideology, you can focus on what matters, instead of fixating on how thoroughly "communist" or "capitalist" you can be. China has began to dispense with the rigid ideology the past few decades. The US has doubled down on ideology. Guess which country is rising, and which is falling.

  3. Perfect name by Dan+East · · Score: 1

    If ever there was a perfect name for a communist "company", "Perfect World" would be it.

    --
    Better known as 318230.
  4. Dissent by proxy by iTrawl · · Score: 2

    Well done rulers of China, you got dissent by proxy. They can't criticise you guys directly, but they'll rise up via the commercial products that you guys get your hands into.

    Doublethink:
    1. Communist Party is the best party in the world (except for the US, who now have the best of everything)
    2. Steam sucks! We want better games! We demand change!

    --
    "Everybody's naked underneath" -- The Doctor
  5. Venezuela is the country that appraises more... by fbobraga · · Score: 1

    ... 'democracy', in Latin america by far, in the http://www.latinobarometro.org... : maybe something like it (misunderstanding a foreign concept, for cultural/political reasons) is happening in China against Steam...

  6. Fringe by jbmartin6 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Chinese gamers love Steam... the global version of it, anyway. There are an estimated 30 million Chinese users playing games on the platform

    For China, 30 million is just a fringe user base. I think it would be accurate to rephrase as 'not very many Chinese gamers have even heard of Steam'

    --
    This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    1. Re:Fringe by Type44Q · · Score: 4, Insightful

      For China, 30 million is just a fringe user base.

      That depends entirely on how poor your math skills are: are you comparing that figure to the number of PC gamers in China or the number of people??

    2. Re:Fringe by larryjoe · · Score: 1

      For China, 30 million is just a fringe user base.

      That depends entirely on how poor your math skills are: are you comparing that figure to the number of PC gamers in China or the number of people??

      According to this article, there are around 300 million PC gamers in China. So, the 30 million is still a small portion of gamers. However, many Chinese gamers play in internet cafes, and those are the gamers that Steam wants to access.

  7. Re: Goodbye, my Chinese friends. by aliquis · · Score: 1

    Lorelei.

  8. Re:Goodbye, my Chinese friends. by Luckyo · · Score: 1

    Wrong tree to take a piss on. With the ongoing crackdown on gaming in China, it's almost certain that Steam is getting banned on the Great Firewall of China in near future. Valve simply sees the writing on the wall and is attempting to keep at least some of the market share.

    Valve isn't the cause here. It's the victim desperately trying to adapt to the changing environment before it's killed off by the government entirely.

  9. Re:Steam is Not So Good for Females, Anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What's wrong with the existing rules which already prohibit harassment and the like? Or is your issue with enforcement?

  10. If only the people of China could do something... by SpencerWilliams · · Score: 1

    Steam China get out of China? Because they don't like their own government-imposed censorship? Do any of these firebrands plan to change any of their own draconian policies?

  11. Re:WTF are you smoking? by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Nope. Bing is scrubbed by Chinese firewall. However, Google/Bing/etc are not needed. Not all stories are in writing and ppl talk.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  12. Re:Steam is Not So Good for Females, Anyway by Lothsahn · · Score: 1

    I agree with this. Sexual abuse and harassment against any person, whether they be female, male, intrasex, or otherwise is wrong. As I understand it, steam rules exist to prevent harassment, and topics that are political or flamebait get locked by moderators quickly, like your above topic.

    It's right in the steam topic that you created, before it got locked:
    Ask for rules that protect everyone.
    Wait, the rules are there.
    Report and move on.


    I suspect you're not getting the support you want from the Steam and Slashdot crowds because many of us are against identity politics. Instead of identifying and grouping people based on aspects of their identity, many of us (myself included) prefer to deem harassment, sexual assault and vitrol as unwanted and bad against ALL users and put in place rules to protect everyone, regardless of race, gender, sexual orientation, or other aspects of one's identity.

    I fully recognize that certain groups of individuals may encounter harassment, assault, and vitrol more than others, but that simply means that the rules provide those people more protection and redress, which is a GOOD THING(tm).

    --
    -=Lothsahn=-
  13. The moon? The frickin' government!!! by SpencerWilliams · · Score: 1

    But... China's government is composed of their own people! Yes, let us bring up Tianenmen Square where almost every single effing Chinese citizen was in support of the movement. There was a very *very* small group of people who gave the military (most of whom indeed supported this movement!) orders to kill their own people, so that everyone with a uniform and a gun who did not want to do this nevertheless told themselves they have to because these really powerful people are giving them orders. Yes, if only China governend itself... if only China was ruled by its own effing citizens instead of viewing their leadership as some kind of inanimate object that gives them orders they all disagree with. Effing ridiculous...

  14. What might this mean for the inverse? by Monster_user · · Score: 1

    So, with China cracking down on ways to get around filters, what is this going to mean for the quality of games coming out of China?

    Perfect World is mentioned here as teaming up with Steam. Perfect World is a developer, owner, and publisher of MMORPGs, Notable examples of games they have include: Neverwinter Online, Star Trek Online, Torchlight, Final Fantasy Type-0, Champions Online, and City of Heroes.

    How much of this content is designed in China these days? How much of the content that appeals to a western audience is based on media and artwork provided over a VPN connection?

    What impact will this have on trade, and communication, and relationships? What will we have in common once "The Great [Fire]Wall of China" goes up? How will we maintain the peace when there is nothing to bring us together peacefully?

  15. Re: Goodbye, my Chinese friends. by Luckyo · · Score: 1

    I guess you also blame German Jews for the holocaust?

  16. Re: Goodbye, my Chinese friends. by Luckyo · · Score: 1

    You're not wrong. But that's not how human psyche works. At all. You may as well expect ants to value the individual ant or suggest that sea cucumbers should fly.

  17. Re: Goodbye, my Chinese friends. by Cederic · · Score: 1

    That didn't go so well for them in the Warsaw ghetto. Still the right option though.

    China is a different situation. Many people in China have survived the cultural revolution and seen their children attain a middle class lifestyle. By US or European standards it's horribly compromised but by Chinese standards this is a massive step forward.

    They're more likely to celebrate than revolt. Change has happened and it's possible that it'll continue to happen. The current Chinese Government's actions on the Internet are an acknowledgement that they're losing the cultural battle; closing off the current communications routes will merely open others.

    Remember your Gilmore.

  18. Re: Goodbye, my Chinese friends. by Cederic · · Score: 1

    Oh, and comically I forgot to mention your curious choice of number.

    I think you'll find that rather more than 180k Jewish people prematurely lost their lives between 1938 and 1945. While precise numbers are constantly debated I think 5-6 million is a reasonable estimate.