Slashdot Mirror


Freshwater is Getting Saltier, Threatening People and Wildlife (scientificamerican.com)

Salts that de-ice roads, parking lots and sidewalks keep people safe in winter. But new research shows they are contributing to a sharp and widely rising problem across the U.S. From a report: At least a third of the rivers and streams in the country have gotten saltier in the past 25 years. And by 2100, more than half of them may contain at least 50 percent more salt than they used to. Increasing salinity will not just affect freshwater plants and animals but human lives as well -- notably, by affecting drinking water. Sujay Kaushal, a biogeochemist at the University of Maryland, College Park, recounts an experience he had when visiting relatives in New Jersey. When getting a drink from the tap, "I saw a white film on the glass." After trying to scrub it off, he found, "it turned out to be a thin layer of salt crusting the glass."

When Kaushal, who studies how salt invades freshwater sources, sampled the local water supply he found not just an elevated level of the sodium chloride, widely used in winter to de-ice outdoor surfaces, but plenty of other salts such as sodium bicarbonate and magnesium chloride. He also found similar concentrations of these chemicals in most rivers along the east coast, including the Potomac, which provides drinking water for Washington, D.C. Where did all of it come from? De-icing salts, Kaushal determined, are part of the problem, slowly corroding our infrastructure.

164 comments

  1. Cause: all the liberal tears from 2016 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    to [current date].

  2. I only drink Fiji water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so I'm good.

  3. Sodium Chloride? by JBMcB · · Score: 5, Interesting

    People still use sodium chloride as a deicer? Around here, pretty much all municipalities have switched to calcium chloride, which deices better than sodium chloride, and tends to not kill everone's grass. They'll only use sodium chloride in dire emergencies - IE massive ice storm at the end of the season and there's no calcium chloride to be had, which is pretty rare.

    --
    My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
    1. Re:Sodium Chloride? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Also, NaCl only works down to about -20 Celsius. CaCl works much better.

    2. Re:Sodium Chloride? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      Also, NaCl only works down to about -20 Celsius. CaCl works much better.

      Also, CaCl doesn't corrode cars and bridges as badly as NaCl does.

      The big advantage of NaCl is that it is cheap.

      Another option is to put nothing on the roads. This is common in southern states, where snowfall is infrequent, and melts quickly. So everyone just stays home when it snows.

    3. Re:Sodium Chloride? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reminds me how I was taking my motorcycle license exam in early March long, long ago and each of us was told to bring a kg of NaCl from a food store to deice the parking lot where the driving test was to be taken.

      Motorcycles were also ~20 years old and barely functional.

      What a great idea - anyone can ride a nice, cared-for machine in good weather, but try passing it on a pile of junk almost without clutch and brakes, and gears switching only when they like to. In freezing weather and with patches of ice still left. Heaps of snow all around provided the passive safety though.

      Best driving lesson I had.

    4. Re:Sodium Chloride? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That would be CaCl2, not CaCl.

      On the farm, calcium chloride appears to counter the adverse effects of salty irrigation water. I cannot find any research on the effect of CaCl2 in streams. It may be beneficial.

    5. Re:Sodium Chloride? by jmccue · · Score: 1

      People still use sodium chloride as a deicer?

      No worries, with Climate change this is a short term problem. Maybe only needed for another 50 years or so.

      My motto (or bumper sticker) "Why retire to Florida when Florida is coming here

    6. Re:Sodium Chloride? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      This is standard in Oregon, and we get lots of ice on the roads.

      Learn how to drive, people. How did they not understand that this was destructive and builds up in their environment and could only ever be a very temporary solution until they learn how to drive?

      What we do after an ice storm is to dump some gravel on the road. It doesn't do anything to our water supply, it just ends up as part of the road shoulder. Yes, you have to drive slower for a week now that there are little rocks on the road. It amazes me how whiny those east coasters get over this part.

    7. Re:Sodium Chloride? by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 2

      In northern Arizona we use volcanic cinder on roads. The city of Flagstaff owns its own little volcano, which it mines for this purpose.

    8. Re:Sodium Chloride? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, you have to drive slower for a week now that there are little rocks on the road.

      And replace your windshield every spring. (I grew up in Oregon).

    9. Re:Sodium Chloride? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And why the hell would anyone salt the roads at -20C?

      Once it hits -5, it's better to stop. Keeping the road in the state of constant freezing/meting (which is what happens with salting) destroys the surface. Moreover, the slosh on the road when it's -10 or colder means that wipers can't clean what incoming traffic throws at your windshield - at this temperature the washer liquid freezes on the glass with instant loss of visibility.

    10. Re:Sodium Chloride? by guyniraxn · · Score: 1

      Your winter only lasts a week?

    11. Re:Sodium Chloride? by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

      That might work in Oregon, but that is decidedly minor league as far as snow goes. I've lived in snowy areas, and if they get behind in aggressive ice control - deicer, plowing both before during and after snowfall things get ugly fast. You'll end up with 3' of ever deepening glacier on all your roads with ruts that will beach the tallest monster truck. That shit will still be there come June.

      Gravel has some nasty side effects. It releases tons of particulates which are terrible for breathing and they clog up waterways. Most areas have cut back drastically on gravel since it is so terrible. It is helpful if used judiciously.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    12. Re:Sodium Chloride? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A week is pretty normal for snow and ice in Oregon.

    13. Re:Sodium Chloride? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      That's just derpy. We do have snow plows.

      There is absolutely no reason why using gravel instead of ice means you can't also plow.

      You're just waving your hands and making up how you think things would be, instead of looking around and finding out how things actually are in other places.

    14. Re:Sodium Chloride? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      A week is how long the gravel lasts on the road after application. Obviously, considering geography.

      Has it really come to this? Are the new kids anti-intellectual even here now?

    15. Re:Sodium Chloride? by guyniraxn · · Score: 1

      Anti-intellectual? You came to that conclusion based on your inability to effectively communicate? Show your work.

    16. Re:Sodium Chloride? by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

      I've lived in places that get serious snow. Multiple feet of it. Biggest storm I ever saw was over 10' in 24 hours. I've seen firsthand what happens, one time in Denver it was subzero for days with storm after storm, multiple feet of snow each time. The plows were running nonstop but kept losing ground. Eventually even major roads were deeply rutted and impassible. Even with best practices sometimes nature can overwhelm your resources. Gravel is not best practice. You might be able to get away with it somewhere like Oregon

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    17. Re:Sodium Chloride? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Why do you presume that my ability to communicate hinges on you personally being able to comprehend my statements? Lets just clear that up right now; I write for people capable of comprehension. Even if it is less than 1% of the people whose eyes pass over the page, that is still who I'm targeting.

      If you didn't comprehend what I said, that gives you no information at all about my success at communicating.

      There, now you can say you've seen the formula. I doubt it helped you to understand anything, though.

    18. Re:Sodium Chloride? by Agent0013 · · Score: 1

      Alaska does not use de-ices either. I think they just pack it down and drive on it until it melts.

      --

      -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
  4. Environmentalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    “The demise of water fleas does not just affect the clarity of the water, but will likely also impact the small fish that feed on them,” Hintz adds. “They provide food for the larger fish that humans eat.”

    Conservatives and Republicans, this is why the environment and our ecosystem is important. It's not some "liberal snowflake" luxury. It's about our health and well being.
    And why didn't the summary mention that it's also caused by industrial activities? Business needs to take responsibility for their pollution. Because they just dump or whatever and stick us with the costs.

    1. Re:Environmentalism by Highdude702 · · Score: 4, Funny

      well we obviously need global warming then to stop the snow so they don't have to use the salt on the roads that is salting up the rivers. plus it will melt some glaciers giving us more fresh water! BRB I got to go start this tire fire, its getting a little cold.

    2. Re:Environmentalism by fustakrakich · · Score: 0

      Conservatives and Republicans, this is why the environment and our ecosystem is important.

      Could also be why a Republican signed the EPA into existence waaay back in 1970. Yeah, I know, prehistory for some of you, but shit did happen back then, but people cared, unlike now

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    3. Re:Environmentalism by Freischutz · · Score: 0

      Conservatives and Republicans, this is why the environment and our ecosystem is important.

      Could also be why a Republican signed the EPA into existence waaay back in 1970. Yeah, I know, prehistory for some of you, but shit did happen back then, but people cared, unlike now

      Yes, but that was Republicanus Repulbicanus an ancient species of sane conservative. Unfortunately Republicanus Repulbicanus was driven to extinction by his more primitive, aggressive, dull minded, ignorant and hysterical (some would say insane) cousin Republicanus Trumpicus.

    4. Re:Environmentalism by fustakrakich · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, but they still win elections over the so-called "sane" democrats. Maybe everybody should be looking into the mirror to see why that happens.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    5. Re:Environmentalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you didn't notice the Historic Electoral Drubbing Republicans took last month?

    6. Re:Environmentalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While you could regulate de-icers, I think a solution more likely to actually have an effect on salt contamination is tort reform. So long as someone slipping outside your home or business threatens economic oblivion, there will be excessive use of de-icers.

    7. Re:Environmentalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The... powerful effects that Republican inbreeding has on their mental retardation problem, perhaps?

    8. Re: Environmentalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What was historic about it? Absolutely nothing.

    9. Re: Environmentalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh huh, take off your rose colored glasses. Richard Nixon was president. You suffer from TDS. Seriously, like yes Trump is a jerk but trying to elevate Nixon into some fantasy mythical good guy from the past just so you can justify bashing Trump? Serious serious serious case of TDS.

      Be honest. There are no Republicans or conservatives you have, do, or will ever like. Period. And no republican != conservative.

      Next time just say you hate Trump and stop. No reason to pretend anyone ever thought Nixon was a good guy or that politics in the past was anything different than it is today: bloodsport. Kennedy stole the Preseidency in Chicago from Nixon but we do not whine about that or pretend he was any less a scumbag than Nixon was.

      Read a history book and stop making an ass of yourself.

    10. Re: Environmentalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet when the left has control of all three branches of government they dont pass any bills to resolve this supposed issue. Instead blame the right. Meanwhile i grew up in Cleveland with the salt mines and we never had issues with drinking water.

      -geekpoet
       

    11. Re: Environmentalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The biggest Democratic gain in the House since the post-Watergate election of 1974.

    12. Re:Environmentalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Business needs to take responsibility for their pollution. Because they just dump or whatever and stick us with the costs.

      Whoa there Mr. Anti-America! That sounds like regulations! Do you hate capitalism? Pollution regulations aren't going to MAGA!

    13. Re:Environmentalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering it's primarily the government actually dumping crap on the roads, it's hard to see how you can with a straight face suggest that we need to put the government more in charge and that will solve all the problems.

      Amazing how the solution for the left wing to every government created problem is to take away people's freedom and resources and give more power and those resources to the government instead. Then when that effort fails, the next solution they come up with is more government to fix the ever increasing problems cause by their previous proposals.

      why didn't the summary mention that it's also caused by industrial activities?

      Because it's not. That was all outlawed decades ago. Businesses get sued out of existence if they damage the environment or other people. It's only the government which gives itself the privilege of ignoring other people's property rights and doing massive environmental damage without taking any responsibility.

    14. Re: Environmentalism by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Yeah? what has that ever gotten us, besides massive republican gains two/four years after? You know what an ant mill is?

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    15. Re: Environmentalism by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Too bad it's way below the 'historic losses' of Presidents Obama and Clinton...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    16. Re:Environmentalism by Freischutz · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but they still win elections over the so-called "sane" democrats. Maybe everybody should be looking into the mirror to see why that happens.

      Yeah, I know negative 40 seats in the last house election, it was a truly stunning landslide victor for Trumpicus.

    17. Re:Environmentalism by fustakrakich · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I know negative 40 seats in the last house election, it was a truly stunning landslide victor for Trumpicus.

      Well, yeah, with the seats being occupied by democrats, it is. And, they're putting the same person that lost them 63 seats in 2010 back in charge. Ain't it ironical? We can expect big changes now, right? Don't you people find the merry-go-round to be just a little nauseating by now? Or are tribal instincts that powerful?

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    18. Re:Environmentalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -1
      Democrat moderators on the march! Trolling the internet for any threats to the narrative.

    19. Re:Environmentalism by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Most of the salt is spread by government entities.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    20. Re: Environmentalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And they won't even go to prison like Donny will!

  5. How is it still legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    I remember the same discussion back in the 70s. It also hurts pets and damages roads and cars. In Germany many cities have banned the use of thawing salt on roads and sidewalks; some places still allow it but only in extreme weather. Grit is a perfectly viable alternative and the effect lasts much longer.

    1. Re:How is it still legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Grit is a perfectly viable alternative and the effect lasts much longer.

      There's basically no way that grit or sand is going to replace salt in a major Northern city. If you want to prevent people from dying in road accidents, you have to prevent the buildup of ice, and that means using salts.

      You can reduce the amounts you use, you can apply them better, etc, but it's ridiculous to think the usage rate is going to go to zero.

    2. Re:How is it still legal? by PPH · · Score: 1

      If you want to prevent people from dying in road accidents,

      You slow down. If drivers won't slow down, you use rolling roadblocks. If they try to pass the patrol cars, they get a night in a comfy jail cell.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    3. Re: How is it still legal? by dnaumov · · Score: 4, Informative

      Except for the part where scandinavian countries say you are full of shit and use tiny gravel instead. I havenâ(TM)t seen salt used for decades.

    4. Re:How is it still legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree that depending upon country / local conditions, you need some type of de-icer.

      However, to reduce that need? Well, in Quebec a law was passed outlawing summer and all-season tires in the winter. All-seasons are no comparison to real winter tires, the rubber is so soft on them that they literally melt on some summer days. Google a bit, if curious..

      Anyhow, point is -- modern spiked/studded tires are also very good, and I had some for a few years. Man alive, it was *insane*, the ice was meaningless.

      So I could see that as a way to eliminate de-icer.. at least mostly.

    5. Re:How is it still legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The salt promotes oxidation of metals, and it also seeps into the cracks in asphalt and concrete, then crystallizes forcing the cracks to widen (similar to freeze-thaw action, but actually much stronger). So, the salt destroys people's cars and destroys the roads and other infrastructure. The result of using is many billions of dollars in damages. The snowploughs also do a lot of damage. '

      If we take a look at the actual economics, Massachusetts spent $325 million on snow clearing in 2015 (the most recent year I could find numbers). It has 76,852 lane miles of road, which works out to about 4.87 billion sq. ft. So, that's about 6.67 cents per square foot of road. I'm interested in whether it would be more economical to do it another way, such as melting all the snow with heated roads.

      The high end for average snowfall in MA seems to be 110 inches. The typical conversion into inches of water is about 10 to 1, so that would be 11 inches of water, or 28 cm. The 4.87 billion square feet is 4.524 trillion square centimeters. So, about 126.68 billion liters of water. If we say about -15 celcius for temperature to keep it on the low end, then it takes about 53 quadrillion joules (at 417.68 joules per gram, including latent heat of fusion) of energy to raise the temperature of that much frozen water to 5 degrees celcius. That would be 14.7 billion kilowatt hours. At an industrial rate of 6.67 cents per kW-hour (odd coincidence on that being the national average industrial electricity rate), so the high end for just the power required would be around $981 billion. That's pretty much exactly 3X what it costs to use trucks, salt and ploughs.

      So, at first glance it looks like heated roads would be a bad investment compared to the trucks, salt and ploughs. However, that ignores a few details. For one thing, the current snow removal isn't all that effective. Even after hours of ploughing and salting, the roads are still often difficult and dangerous to drive on. The heated roads would offer tremendously improved conditions. The biggest detail ignored of course is all the damage to people's vehicles and to the roads. It's a very well known fact that older cars from New England are in much worse shape than old cars from the south. That's down to the salt almost entirely. Also, Massachusetts spends a lot more on road repair and maintenance than on snow removal (it's hard to find numbers, but it's in the billions of dollars), and a lot of that is spent on repair of winter damage (also I don't think cleanup of all the grit left on the roads is included in the snow removal budget). If all of that cost is actually considered, then heated roads would probably actually save billions every year as well as prevent the dumping of all this salt into the environment.

    6. Re:How is it still legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree that depending upon country / local conditions, you need some type of de-icer.

      However, to reduce that need? Well, in Quebec a law was passed outlawing summer and all-season tires in the winter. All-seasons are no comparison to real winter tires, the rubber is so soft on them that they literally melt on some summer days. Google a bit, if curious..

      Anyhow, point is -- modern spiked/studded tires are also very good, and I had some for a few years. Man alive, it was *insane*, the ice was meaningless.

      So I could see that as a way to eliminate de-icer.. at least mostly.

      Back in the sixties and seventies studded snow tires were common in my state. The problem was that the users didn't like to take the time to swap them when summer came. Naturally, they needed a law to encourage people to remove those snow tires in summer and so as not to damage those roads and the legislature chose to use a large fine as the stick. Now I couldn't tell you the last time I've seen a snow tire. You can't even find them in the tire stores. I doubt my kids have ever seen one.

      Instead, we have salt everywhere in the winter. They brine the streets constantly if they think there's a possibility of snow. I guess you have to just pick your poison: salty rivers or crumbling roads.

    7. Re:How is it still legal? by Aighearach · · Score: 2

      We do this in the whole State of Oregon you dunce. Of course it works.

      Salt is something idiots do. If they kept doing it for 500 years, you wouldn't even have farms left in that part of the world, you'd just create a desert.

      It is a temporary solution, and it is fucking shit up for you already. You might want those farms and drinking water in the future, so it might be time to merely teach winter driving schools and save the farms.

    8. Re: How is it still legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea because in a snow storm, that's where we want all our cops and resources to go. Policing how people drive in the snow.

      You must be a repubtard.

    9. Re:How is it still legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You really want to contribute to global warming, don't you?

    10. Re:How is it still legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, this sounds to me like a rehash of a story from half a century ago. It is amazing what technology can do to journalism, isn't it?

    11. Re: How is it still legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nuclear roads

    12. Re: How is it still legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Policing how people drive in the snow.

      Better to stop them first than have to clean up dead bodies later.

      You don't like some practical government regulation? You must be a repubtard.

    13. Re: How is it still legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spoken like someone who doesn't know.

      Tell me, oh Trafficfuhrer, how do you derive the exact speed on every inch of road which will send someone to jail?

    14. Re: How is it still legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know there are snow tires that aren't studded.... Right?

    15. Re: How is it still legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Southern states don't count.

    16. Re: How is it still legal? by PPH · · Score: 1

      The speed of the pilot car. Pass him and go directly to jail. This is already codified into most state laws for construction zones and other hazardous traffic situations.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    17. Re:How is it still legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      says someone who doesnt live in a major northern city, or maybe your version of north is south of the 49th parallel?

      In some cities salt just doesn't work and there is nothing that you can do to stop the buildup of ice. That's why those cities use sand instead of salt and require by law the ownership of proper winter tires.

      Your idea that nothing will replace salt is based off of the fact that you haven't lived in places where you cant use salt. There are many different ways to solve any problem and just because you cant see one doesn't mean that one doesn't exist.

      PS it is futile to try and prevent people dieing in road accidents as it is a willing choice to get out on those roads in adverse conditions. Those people also have the choice to stay home or maybe move somewhere else or even SLOW DOWN! all that we can do is try to make the roads a bit more manageable for people but it is impossible to stop people from crashing their shit in the winter because they lack the ability to drive and the self awareness to go get some lessons on driving in adverse conditions.Im sick of people thinking we need to nanny everyone, there is a reasonable amount of assistance that we should give everyone but enforcing the idea that people shouldn't die unless of old age is stupid and you should probably stop trying to force your personal ideals on to other people.

    18. Re: How is it still legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How would it contribute to global warming any more than all the ploughing and salt? If the electricity is cleanly generated, then it will contribute less than a bunch of ICE powered trucks.

    19. Re:How is it still legal? by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      There are 4 million miles of roads in the US, and about 600,000 police + sheriffs and deputies. Most roads are 2 way. Want to describe how 1 policeman for each 13 miles of road will implement rolling roadblocks?

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    20. Re:How is it still legal? by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      981 billion divided by 325 million is not 3.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    21. Re:How is it still legal? by PPH · · Score: 1

      4 million miles of roads in the US

      And it's snowing on all of them at once?

      You can use highway maintenance vehicles for the rolling roadblocks. Laws regarding obeying their instructions applies just as it does for police. I know this. I used to have state traffic control certification when I worked for the local power company.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  6. Thanks Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Something something liberal tears.

    But seriously, Trump is deregulation incarnate... Nothing will be implemented to prevent this.

  7. Self driving cars should fix this by slickwillie · · Score: 4, Funny

    I mean, they should be able to drive on icy roads, right?

    1. Re:Self driving cars should fix this by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2

      Physics is physics and friction is friction, regardless what is driving the vehicle. The solution? Don't salt the roads. Put down sand and winter tires or chains should be mandatory. Salting is actually rare in cold-climate countries outside the US as well as cold states in the Western US (i.e. Idaho).

    2. Re:Self driving cars should fix this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My dad said they used sand in Toledo, Ohio until sometime in the 1960's. When my dad called the city to complain, they said it was too much work to remove sand from the storm sewers. Short sighted at best.

    3. Re:Self driving cars should fix this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Germany salts like crazy. I live in the Black Forest. Cars rust quickly here. Some municipalities seem so prefer sand and gravel when possible, but when it hangs around freezing they use a lot of salt. Well below freezing (we get a lot of -18C days) the salt doesn't help, gravel is much more useful. But when it is around 0C, salt is thrown everywhere! Winter capable tires are mandatory, but the specifics of the laws are vague.

    4. Re:Self driving cars should fix this by XXongo · · Score: 1
      I think the original poster was intending to be ironic.

      However, since the problem with driving on ice is mostly that 10% of drivers that don't have a clue of how to drive in slippery conditions, actually self-driving cars would probably help.

      Or maybe not. I think 100% of the software for self driving cars comes from Southern California, where they don't bother programming for unlikely events like ice on the roads.

    5. Re:Self driving cars should fix this by neilo_1701D · · Score: 1

      I think 100% of the software for self driving cars comes from Southern California, where they don't bother programming for unlikely events like ice on the roads.

      Or, indeed, unforeseen things like drunk driving, crash barriers and 18 wheelers across the road...

    6. Re:Self driving cars should fix this by PPH · · Score: 2

      until sometime in the 1960's
      .
      .
      too much work to remove sand from the storm sewers

      This.

      But in the 1960s, that meant sending someone into each storm sewer grate with a shovel and bucket. Now they use Vactor trucks.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    7. Re:Self driving cars should fix this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chains destroy roads much faster than salt.

    8. Re:Self driving cars should fix this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Physics is physics and friction is friction, regardless what is driving the vehicle. The solution? Don't salt the roads. Put down sand and winter tires or chains should be mandatory.

      Salting is actually rare in cold-climate countries outside the US as well as cold states in the Western US (i.e. Idaho).

      Says the guy who pisses and moans about everybody not using public transportation like he does in NYC.

    9. Re:Self driving cars should fix this by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Electronic traction control is why I can drive around on a sheet of solid ice without chains or traction tires or anything. Even with a dusting of snow on top. Even onramps, offramps.

      Right now self-driving cars suck at snow, but that's about vision. The traction part they'll have an easy time be better at handling than humans.

    10. Re:Self driving cars should fix this by guruevi · · Score: 1

      Most municipalities already use a combination of sand and salt. The problem is more south-wards where ice and snow are much rarer, they tend to spray pure salt the minute a flock of snow hits their pavement. Further north, they don't even use salt until you get a few cm of snow (you just get mud slush).

      Chains aren't a panacea either, you can only go ~30km/h (20mph) on them or risk destroying either the chains or the car and you lose a lot of grip if it hasn't quite snowed that much.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    11. Re:Self driving cars should fix this by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2

      If you're driving on a sheet of "solid ice" and not skidding off of it, you're probably not driving on solid ice. Most cars made after 2012 or so have traction/stability control, and one still sees stuck late-model cars. Physics is physics.

    12. Re:Self driving cars should fix this by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      All three of your examples though are from non-self-driving cars in situations involving lane-assist features.

      Maybe you're wearing too much cologne and the Musk is clawing at your nose. Or something. Probably Musk-related, though.

    13. Re:Self driving cars should fix this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd be amazed how many idiots are getting stuck trying to drive around on bald tires or, even more insane, summer performance tires. Those summer tires shouldn't be driven on below about 45F even if the road is clean and dry.

    14. Re: Self driving cars should fix this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it's called reality.

      Self driving cars are 20 years away bunk.

    15. Re: Self driving cars should fix this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Self driving cars can't yet handle winter conditions. Slipperyness is not a problem, it is easily countered by slowing down. But ice covers all road markings, and sometimes makes it unclear where the road even goes. Humans usually figure it out, automatic cars not so much.

    16. Re:Self driving cars should fix this by Agent0013 · · Score: 1

      But they don't kill the rivers and croplands. Just remember, they used to salt the field of the enemy's so they would never be able to grow food again. And we do it to ourselves without thinking.

      --

      -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
  8. Meaningless statistics by renzema · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "by 2100, more than half of them may contain at least 50 percent more salt than they used to" - a total meaningless statistic. Are are going from 1 ppb to 2 ppb, which is essentially a non-event, or from 1% to 2%, which would have serious implications? Doubling without giving a baseline and what that baseline represents is just scaremongering.

    1. Re:Meaningless statistics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "by 2100, more than half of them may..."

      I usually stop reading after that word. If the word is "will" however and there's even a clearly stated baseline, then I remember correlation is not causation (of course mental flat earthers will make exceptions to that when it suits them)

    2. Re:Meaningless statistics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Doubling without giving a baseline and what that baseline represents is just scaremongering."

      It's 2018, all news is scaremongering. It gets more eyeballs on advertisements.

    3. Re:Meaningless statistics by Ichijo · · Score: 1

      Well that's one argument for keeping the populace ignorant. ("Ignorance is bliss," as they say.) Are there any more?

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    4. Re:Meaningless statistics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "by 2100, more than half of them may contain at least 50 percent more salt than they used to" - a total meaningless statistic. Are are going from 1 ppb to 2 ppb, which is essentially a non-event, or from 1% to 2%, which would have serious implications? Doubling without giving a baseline and what that baseline represents is just scaremongering.

      Must be some sort of American non-metric math when 50% more is a doubling.

    5. Re:Meaningless statistics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "at least 50 percent more"...

      Doubling without giving a baseline...

      x + 0.5x != 2x, unless x=0.

    6. Re:Meaningless statistics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "by 2100, more than half of them may contain at least 50 percent more salt than they used to" - a total meaningless statistic. Are are going from 1 ppb to 2 ppb, which is essentially a non-event, or from 1% to 2%, which would have serious implications? Doubling without giving a baseline and what that baseline represents is just scaremongering.

      PSA - increasing by 50% is not the same as doubling.

      - Your friendly neighborhood mathematician

    7. Re: Meaningless statistics by renzema · · Score: 1

      Yea, you got me. But the principle is the same. 50% more than x, where x is not clearly defined is still meaningless.

  9. Now what do they call that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only the life that can adapt to this change will live...we need a name for this process! Oh and blame the humans because they are really smart and are in no way a part of life.

  10. My BS detector is pegged by nicoleb_x · · Score: 2

    This is all hyperbole and other than a few random water tests is very weak on facts. Salinity increases are usually caused by droughts.

  11. Tapwater? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0

    Who drinks tapwater? Our ruling class doesn't let it touch them unless it's in the shower. Drinking tapwater is a sure class marker of the deplorables, right alongside watching sportsball or murdering animals with assault rifles. Don't believe me? Invite one of their kids over and give zir a glass of tapwater to drink, and see if the parents let zir come over again. Take it from them: don't drink it, don't cook with it, don't even brush your teeth with it. If you can't afford the pittance it costs for pure water, go ahead and pollute your kids' bodies. Just don't contaminate theirs.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    1. Re:Tapwater? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who drinks tapwater? Our ruling class doesn't let it touch them unless it's in the shower. Drinking tapwater is a sure class marker of the deplorables, right alongside watching sportsball or murdering animals with assault rifles. Don't believe me? Invite one of their kids over and give zir a glass of tapwater to drink, and see if the parents let zir come over again. Take it from them: don't drink it, don't cook with it, don't even brush your teeth with it. If you can't afford the pittance it costs for pure water, go ahead and pollute your kids' bodies. Just don't contaminate theirs.

      As i picture the scene, tapwater isn't it. Psychodad is the real problem.

    2. Re:Tapwater? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're probably one of the dumbest faggots in the world, but THANK GOD you don't have any ACTUAL KIDS dns-cock-breath.

    3. Re:Tapwater? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who drinks tapwater?

      People whose tapwater quality rivals the quality of (good) bottled water. Bottle water is silly, when it simply is bottled tapwater. It may be bottled "straight from a nice well" but so is our tapwater, so . . .

  12. This will kill you... by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

    ...much faster than "climate change". The fact that people are ignoring local pollution to focus on climate change is outrageous. You can't sell carbon credits to "fix" local pollution though.

    1. Re:This will kill you... by XXongo · · Score: 1
      That's a false dichotomy-- it's not mutually exclusive.

      And your scare headline is wrong.

    2. Re:This will kill you... by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      No, but it is complimentary. Fixing all the local problems does the same for the global one at the same time. The whole flock can turn on a dime, in an instant, when the individuals are in sync

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    3. Re:This will kill you... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, it's far easier to stop salting the damn roads than to switch away from all fossil fuels globally and start artificially sequestering carbon on a planetary scale.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  13. I'm offended by goombah99 · · Score: 0

    As a halophile american I'm insulted that people think my way of life is imperiling. Hey if you hate salt in the water supply then you should stop peeing mr high and mighty Halo-phobe. Can't we just leave salt people alone! this all started with the bible, and the denigration of people turned into pillars of salt. I think it must all be a mis translation of the word Salt. Who ever heard of a pillar of salt?

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:I'm offended by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We need more lead in the water supply. Lead is good for you!

    2. Re:I'm offended by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lead gives young Republicans the minerals they need to grow. There's 4 oz in every bottle of pure, delicious Trump vodka. Get boofing, alumnius!

    3. Re: I'm offended by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Found the TDS infected person who can't help but bring President Trump into a discussion that has nothing to do with him. Please just move to Canada or something.

    4. Re: I'm offended by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what do Total Dissolved Solids have to due with our 45th terrible president in a row

    5. Re: I'm offended by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Generals Washington, Grant, and Eisenhower would like a word with you.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  14. What manners. by nukenerd · · Score: 1

    FTFA :-

    .... an experience he had when visiting relatives in New Jersey. When getting a drink from the tap, "I saw a white film on the glass." After trying to scrub it off ....

    He sounds like a model house guest.

    1. Re:What manners. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I saw a white film on the glass." After trying to scrub it off, he found, "it turned out to be a thin layer of salt crusting the glass.

      For it to be enough to coat the glass it's far more likely it was a film of dishwasher salt left from when the glass was last washed. And it wouldn't have had time to crystallize.

  15. You're still using salts?? Are you from the past? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Using salt for de-icing has been illegal for a long time. I thought that was the case everywhere.
    Not only because dogs suffered from it. Obviously the plants around it did too.

    We just use gravel. Although its sharp nature isn't exactly nice for dogs either.

  16. Jokes aside this is a problem that only affects by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    the poor. You can buy a reverse osmosis filtration system for about $200-$500 bucks per faucet and that should filter out most of the salt.

    Also, when it comes to water rural communities have much, much bigger problems. Their pipes are going on 100 years old and nobody wants to pay to replace them. Estimates put it at $750 billion to fix the whole country. I'm surprised nobody on the left is talking about that. All they talk about is roads and bridges. Get that message across and you could snatch the farmlands back from the right wing.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Jokes aside this is a problem that only affects by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      All they talk about is roads and bridges.

      Well, yeah, the money spreads farther. Pipes only affect one city at a time. Flint has already been forgotten. Certain conspiracy theories make far better headlines around the country.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  17. CaCl2 [Re:Sodium Chloride?] by XXongo · · Score: 2

    People still use sodium chloride as a deicer? Around here, pretty much all municipalities have switched to calcium chloride, which deices better than sodium chloride, and tends to not kill everone's grass.

    In general it's the chloride that's the problem, not the sodium ion, so CaCl2 is not much better than NaCl for the environment. It does de-ice at a lower temperature, though. https://stormwater.pca.state.m... https://www.oxycalciumchloride...

    1. Re:CaCl2 [Re:Sodium Chloride?] by JBMcB · · Score: 2

      In general it's the chloride that's the problem, not the sodium ion, so CaCl2 is not much better than NaCl for the environment. It does de-ice at a lower temperature, though.

      Er, no. Sodium chloride tends to interfere with water take-up in macro- and micro- organisms. It's an issue with sodium chloride in particular. Calcium Chloride *can* have the same effect, but you need a *very* high concentration. The chloride ions can be a problem, also, but again, you need a TON of the stuff to impact anything.

      It's just one data point, but there is a river that runs near my house that snakes it's way for miles towards a lake. The majority of storm drains in the county I'm in dump into it. Where it hits the lake is some of the best fishing in the area. It's dense with seaweed and fish. If increased calcium chloride had any kind of adverse effect on micro or macro organisms, it would be occurring in that spot.

      --
      My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
    2. Re:CaCl2 [Re:Sodium Chloride?] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> "In general it's the chloride that's the problem, not the sodium ion..."

      Fine, that settles it. We will now sprinkle the roads with Sodium.

    3. Re: CaCl2 [Re:Sodium Chloride?] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Deice the road with sodium metal? The ice will certainly go away, but I'm not sure the road will survive the experience. Should be a great light show though.

    4. Re:CaCl2 [Re:Sodium Chloride?] by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Instead of salt, try some lateral thinking. Build your properties above major roads and turn building lots into parks. Safe travel in all weathers and you are directly above transport corridors for easy social and business access, you also recover than land value under roads.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  18. Re:drinking water by StikyPad · · Score: 1

    Seems like municipal water systems should be performing RO before sending water out to begin with.

  19. We're all gettin' saltier every year by zwarte+piet · · Score: 1

    It's part of the human experience

  20. Re:drinking water by neilo_1701D · · Score: 2

    Given the nature of how water treatment works everyone should be using a reverse osmosis (RO) system for their *drinking* water. .

    Whilst I agree, this doesn't help the environment. Birds, ducks, fish etc. don't have the luxury of finding a nice, portable RO system to carry around.

  21. Re: drinking water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what nature of water treatment are you talking about

    municipal-scale membrane ultrafiltration is becoming more and more common as installation costs go down and knowledge of their operation becomes more widespread

    reverse osmosis is useful for desalination and reusing wastewater for drinking water. for general domestic drinking water without an especially contaminated source, RO is ridiculous overkill and is incredibly wasteful in terms of power consumption and the wastewater it generates for negligible improvements in water quality compared to micro- or ultrafiltration

    pharmaceuticals are only present in surface waters drawn downstream of wastewater plants. the concentrations you'd find in drinking water under those conditions are so subtheraputically trace as to render concern about them laughable

  22. Re:drinking water by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

    The thing is, in the U.S., we're used to being able to drink the water straight from the tap. Seems only civilized, kinda like having an indoor toilet. It would be a real shame and a giant step backwards to give that up.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  23. Obxkcd by ricks03 · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Obxkcd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am so tired of XKCD. Slashdorks constantly pull out something as though it's the most insightful shit ever created. You guys act like Randall is Jesus Christ, King Solomon and Albert Einstein all rolled into one. He's not. And I'd like to try out that $5 wrench scenario on anyone who ever posts it again.

    2. Re:Obxkcd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So did you click the link?

  24. Re:drinking water by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 2

    To a degree; OP's point is that you have multiple grades of needs, and the central supply shouldn't really treat all water to the highest requirement. There is also the lead pipe issue in places and a host of other things that really make it a good idea.

    Only downside is you waste a lot of water with RO; nice if you can pipe the concentrate stream for something like laundry or at least toilet flushing.

  25. What we need is more global warming! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What we need is more global warming!

  26. Distillation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm already distilling my drinking water to remove fluoride and xenoestrogens. Been doing this for my son's entire life - he's 3 and perfectly healthy in every respect. The kid never stops playing.

    1. Re: Distillation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      of all reasons to distill water you picked the two stupidest

    2. Re: Distillation? by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Fluoride, if used, should be applied to teeth by toothbrush or mouthwash. Whole-body application via drinking water is not beneficial and might be harmful.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  27. Re: drinking water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RO does not remove chloramine. Many municipalities use it to disinfect the water.

    Remember you were told not to mix ammonia and chlorine? Yeah, just like that.

    Nothing removes chloramine.

  28. Numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I read the article. Nowhere did it mention actual levels. Twice 1ppb is 2ppb. Neither is very dramatic. I would have liked to have seen seawater is x% salt and fresh was y% and is now z%. Maybe it is a real problem, but would it have killed them to quantify it? I'd like to see more numbers before I decide the sky is falling. Lastly, the crux is that we are swamping the environment with too many of us, and unlike lemmings we do not purge when we exceed resources.

  29. Water softeners that use salt by bjdevil66 · · Score: 1

    They use a ridiculous amount of salt just to soften water - and dump salt directly into the water reservoir.

    The tech should be restricted or banned since there are other solutions out there.

    1. Re: Water softeners that use salt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that is not how water softening occurs. salt is used to recharge an ion exchange medium; it is not just dumped into water (that would do nothing to remove hardness).

      another way to soften water is by adding slaked lime. sometimes soda ash is used in addition to lime when non-carbonate hardness is high. soda ash would raise the sodium content of the water slightly but it's a far cry from just dumping salt into water

  30. I'd think it's a drop in the ocean (pun intended) by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    I'd think that seawater infiltrating freshwater sources, as ocean levels rise, would be a bigger long-term threat than de-icing roads.

  31. Re: drinking water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    activated carbon removes chloramines. most ro units have carbon filters

  32. Rediculous measures. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The quote says:
    > And by 2100, more than half of them may contain at least 50 percent more salt than they used to.

    So if it was 100000 times less than the maximum allowable, in 2100, it will be 60000 times less than permissible. Is that a problem?

    I don't know the numbers, but the quoted sentence doesn't change that....

    1. Re:Rediculous measures. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that a problem?

      Maybe for the people alive then, if there ARE any people alive then. What are YOU worried about? Count your blessings that you're here now.

  33. Re: drinking water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *you* (the general public) are told not to mix chlorine and ammonia cleaning products because the products of their reaction can be hazardous to you when uncontrolled and in high concentrations

    chloramination in water treatment occurs under finely controlled conditions in an extremely dilute fashion that effectively disinfects water while minimizing disinfection by-products generated via chlorination

  34. Tap water used to be better than bottled water. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here in Germany, the standards for tap water are still higher than for bottled water. Which is why Coke, Pepsi & Nestle didn't have much chances to rip us off here. So they tried to "privatize" our city water plants. Which is the neocon-fascist word for stealing things from the public to get a monopoly, in order to gouge money from the public. The backlash didn't go well for them.

    I'm telling you this, because in the USA, this already happened!
    Lewis Black has a nice bit on it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x9NgP5WP7bE

  35. Re:You're still using salts?? Are you from the pas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Using salt for de-icing has been illegal for a long time. I thought that was the case everywhere.
    Not only because dogs suffered from it. Obviously the plants around it did too.

    We just use gravel. Although its sharp nature isn't exactly nice for dogs either.

    We don't feed it to our dogs. We also don't feed gravel to them either. Maybe you need a smarter breed of dog?

  36. Global Communism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only possible sollution! Ask any leftist

    1. Re: Global Communism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is a pretty good idea; not only would it directly and effectively solve this prpblem, but there is a whole slew of ancillary benefits

    2. Re: Global Communism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like massive depopulation from starvation? Cause that would happen.

    3. Re: Global Communism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the famine of 1931-33 was a natural disaster, but fortunately collectivized farming ended the cycle of famines that had afflicted southern russia and ukraine for centuries. communism brought feudal nations into the industrial age within a couple decades in an historically unprecedented leap in freedom and quality of life

    4. Re: Global Communism by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Collectivized farming replaced cyclical famine with perpetual famine.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  37. Re: Jokes aside this is a problem that only affect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You must be a foreigner. The typical white rural American understands the Left loathes and despises his/her entire existence and way of life.

    Talking about fixing a few pipes is not going to suddenly make them all vote for people who hate them and want to destroy all they hold dear.

    If not a foreigner you must be a far left city dweller who calls in fly over country and thinks they are all stupid, u educated, deplorable sub-humans.

    You will never understand why Trump got re-elected.

  38. Re: Tap water used to be better than bottled water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in the USA tapwater is similarly highly regulated, while bottled water has very little regulation

    water privatization has been and continues to be a stain on the quality and reliability of our water supplies where it is legal. it's common for these private water companies to treat fines as "the cost of doing business"; they tend to quickly cycle through certified plant operators as folks quit to avoid civil penalties and license forfeiture due to problems the company refuses to fix

  39. And destroys billions of $ of property a year! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cars (and bikes) that could last for thirty+ years are destroyed in fifteen. Heavy industry spew out tons of CO2, other pollutants and heavy metals. Get snow tires and drive slower!

    Is being able to drive the same speed all year around really worth destroying the world?

  40. You A-Holes deserve it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, you assholes don't give a single fuck about the environment, global or local. Therefore, you deserve to every hardship it creates.
    Forest fires, earth quakes from fraking, CAT 5 hurricanes from global warming and now, no drinking water.

    You deserve this fate. But hey, maybe you can drive your hummers to Mexico and get some of their water.

    1. Re: You A-Holes deserve it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CAT5 hurricanes? Damn I gotta lock up my Ethernet cables, I don't want them attaching me now.

  41. Re:drinking water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been to the US many times and I've never had tap water over there that was remotely close to drinkable.

  42. Re: Tap water used to be better than bottled water by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

    In the US some companies got caught bottling tap water and selling it as "spring water".

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  43. Re:drinking water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obvious troll is obvious. Fuck off!

  44. How to fix this by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    When a person wants to "drive" make them ask their gov for permission.
    Are they a criminal? An illegal migrant?
    Once people who are approved to 'drive" are found then start with much better education.
    Lots of tests and advanced driving simulators.
    Finally normal driving.
    Then bring in advance ice driving as part of testing.
    How a car drives in winter conditions.
    Pass the new tests and a nations driving population will be able to better use winter and summer roads.

    Ensure transport used has the approved and correct equipment for winter. Enforce car and equipment laws every winter.
    Clear the roads sooner and have a better quality of educated and tested driver.
    Find better drivers, have the correct equipment. Study what is needed on a road so good drivers with good winter equipment can drive.
    That could see a reduction in the total national de-ice effort. Better drivers, less total amounts of de-ice spending. In terns of amount of chemicals used, the types of chemicals and number of roads that need all winter de-ice work.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    1. Re: How to fix this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, only folks rich enough to have new vehicles in perfect condition get to go to work in the winter? Or to buy food? Why not just the people you like? Screw democracy, lets put this guy in charge. Try thinking from someone else's point of view once in a while.

    2. Re: How to fix this by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      AC eg Driving licence in Finland https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  45. Re: Jokes aside this is a problem that only affect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You must be an inbred nazi faggot of no consequence. You WILL understand why exactly Trump and his bitch traitor sons die in FEDERAL PRISON, because Mueller will spend many nights explaining it to your punk ass.

    The system works, faggot.

  46. Re:drinking water by schematix · · Score: 1

    Pretty ignorant statement. RO water is actually pretty corrosive to distribution systems (flint, MI anyone?). Better to put it just where it's needed - for drinking water.

    --
    Scott
  47. Re: Tap water used to be better than bottled wate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, there name is nestle and they still are doing it. It plainly says right on the label, but no one knows how to read anything thats not on a screen anymore.

  48. Shelter from the Storm [Re:CaCl2] by XXongo · · Score: 1

    Instead of salt, try some lateral thinking. Build your properties above major roads and turn building lots into parks. Safe travel in all weathers and you are directly above transport corridors for easy social and business access, you also recover than land value under roads.

    Good idea, but note that you will now need to illuminate your roads. That takes energy.