Slashdot Mirror
Arctic Posts Second Warmest Year On Record In 2018, NOAA Says (reuters.com)
According to a new report released on Tuesday by the U.S. National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration, the Arctic had its second-hottest year on record in 2018. "Arctic air temperatures for the past five years have exceeded all previous records since 1900," according to the annual NOAA study, the 2018 Arctic Report Card, which said the year was second only to 2016 in overall warmth in the region. Reuters reports: The study said the Arctic warming continues at about double the rate of the rest of the planet, and that the trend appears to be altering the shape and strength of the jet stream air current that influences weather in the Northern Hemisphere. "Growing atmospheric warmth in the Arctic results in a sluggish and unusually wavy jet-stream that coincided with abnormal weather events," it said, noting that the changing patterns have often brought unusually frigid temperatures to areas south of the Arctic Circle. Some examples are "a swarm of severe winter storms in the eastern United States in 2018, and the extreme cold outbreak in Europe in March 2018 known as 'the Beast from the East.'"
What the hell?
where does that leave us trans eurasicans? cease fire stand down.. never a better time to transform from doings to beings?
The medieval warm period. Really. C'mon. Don't want to go back to the dinosaurs as usual to show just how warm earth can be and still sustain life?
But ok. The MWP. First of all, even during the MWP it wasn't as warm as it is today. It was about 0.2 to 0.4 degrees Celsius warmer than before. Today we're at about 1.0 degrees warmer than it was in the 800s. Second, the MWP was not an uniform climate change as we experience today. It was mostly a localized phenomenon with various areas experiencing warmer periods during different times in those 300ish years.
In other words, there's a reason why even the most harebrained deniers don't use it. Stick with the dinosaurs, back then it was at least warmer than it is today.
We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
So what's to worry, it's colder than it was before. See? It's not getting warmer, it's getting colder!
(And yes, this is sarcasm. It's actually pretty sad that it is necessary to explicitly say so...)
We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
that's what's left of us without our conscious conscience relation to our universal spirit? like an empty shell echoing whatever the digital wind blows? no heart no spirit no life?
I won't spend my holidays there.
Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
There are plenty of natural oscillations and trends in climate. It's been warmer in the prehistoric past and there have been notable oscillations in the past millennium. The Medieval Warm Period and Little Ice Age were significant, driven by changes in insolation and volcanic activity. However, the temperature anomalies during those periods weren't as large as the change over the past few decades. Yes, it's a blip in the entirety of geologic time, but that's precisely why it's so alarming. If the changes are gradual, life has time to adapt, and the consequences are far less severe than if the changes are abrupt.
And yes, there have been abrupt changes in climate in the Earth's past. The worst of the five mass extinction events in the past billion years ago occurred at the Permian-Triassic boundary. This was an abrupt warming about 252 million years ago that occurred over the span of about 20,000 years. The initial cause may have been numerous volcanoes in present day Siberia burning through a massive deposit of fossil fuels, releasing massive amounts of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. Nickel from the volcanic eruptions caused a particular microbe in the oceans to flourish, which generated huge amounts of methane. Global temperatures surged, life in the oceans died rapidly and decomposed, producing toxic hydrogen sulfide that was deadly to life both in the oceans and on land. The result nearly ended life on Earth, due in part to the abruptness of the event preventing natural processes from mitigating the various factors, and not allowing time for life to adapt.
the arctic comes to you..
Since even the president of the US is convinced that global warming is a Chinese hoax, we have to be impressed by the way China is playing this game. The Chinese manage to really create ever warmer weather year after year, just to fool us into thinking global warming is real. They are truly brilliant.
You're right. The Earth has been both warmer and cooler in the past. What's your fucking point?
As coastal cities continue to flood, should we just say, "Well, we're not going to do anything about it, because it happened before in the pre-cambrian era?"
I don't respond to AC's.
And that matters why?
It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
I mean, that's such an obvious conspiracy theory troll. You're not even trying to make the fiction that you believe it sound real.
It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
You're obviously an Einstein level savant for figuring that out for yourself so fast. I was wondering for a long time if "second hottest" meant there was ONE year that was hotter.
Penguins don't pay for shit though. Always want things free. Waiting until it really warms up so I can build cities, tract housing, whorehouses, and casinos. And prisons. Lots of prisons. Gotta put those republicans somewhere.
Did they change the meaning of extreme in the early 2010's? It seems everything is extreme now. What is it when it is -60C? mega-hyper-ultra cold?
Maybe, we should not socialize the losses of coastal properties via our National Flood Insurance program? For all the talk of climate change, I see homes swept away by hurricanes and then even bigger ones replace them in under two years. In my lifetime NJ beachfronts now look like a glass wall with massive homes built as close to the beach as possible.
If the government insures a property and it is lost to floodwaters - a condition of claim payment should be that the property becomes prohibited to future development. If private landowners and private insurers want to take on this risk - good for them.
Building these homes over and over again sticks the taxpayer with the disaster bill.
Did you know the temperature of the whole universe used to be over a billion degrees and nobody died at all back then?
Did you know the arctic has actually cooled considerably since July?
Is this going far enough that I need to point out it's meant as parody? I seriously hope it is.
700-750 years ago Northern Europe stopped growing grapes to be fermented into wine and started growing grains and fermenting that into beer. Why? Because it became too cold to grow grapes. It is still too cold.
Events in the past caused us to evolve with a single-minded purpose to overpopulate. This is reflected in civilization and religion. The result of overpopulation is usual in lemmings but may cause consternation in humans, who have little expeience in managing this. The godless religion of political correctness can't recognise this, so the suicide cults win.
If all the warming is happening in the arctic then the solution is simple. We need to stop that criminal warm air coming into our country and taking all our cold. We need to build a wall.
l . ,-,__, .{ / ,__\ Gee .U__| T__, that /\ o } o} \ in .l/ / window .j . .] / sure /} good .{ . .Y lookin! .\l Say .\ . .\ mister .l\ . \ much? .I } . } I .1/ . / would .{ . / trade ./ ./| you ./ ~-_, a .(, \-~`'~ whole .\ \_, ovaltine
l
l { `}'- -/ golly
l {`}'\ _, mister
l
l / . . . \ \ woman
l/
/ / \`~' `T } } the
{ { . } .
\ \
l\ \/ . . }/ is
l \{ . \
I
l . 1 .
l .
l . . 1, . \ how
l . .
l . .
l . .
. . .
. . .
. . . /
. .
. . .
. . . . `'~ can
He slept alone Tuesday night on a cot bolted to the floor of a cell he shares with no one. When his door was unlocked Wednesday morning, Cosby stepped into a TV room that was empty except for his guards. Several cells identical to his own lined the walls in this section of State Correctional Institution Phoenix, and every one of them was vacant. Cosby ate breakfast, lunch and dinner by himself. He walked the yard without company. Four times that day — at precisely 6:10 a.m., 12:30 p.m., 4:30 p.m. and at 9 p.m. before lights out — a guard walked the unit to count the prisoners, and the count was always one.
Everybody knows that is best for skiing, toboggan, and snowballs. This warm Arctic, well...
Poe's Law. It's not just for religion anymore.
We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
"it's okay when my house is flooded, because 1 billion years ago it was an ocean"
Pity the US isn't and continues to not only be one of the worst, but getting even worse.
How was the stats changed this time around?
New statistical methods = new history.
What a crazy baseless conspiracy theory - you guys know that once the planet cools and you're selling 'man made global cooling', just like in the 1970's and 1980's, we'll be using articles like this to disprove that too!
The political position of 'I am going to save the world and you will pay for it' does not exactly resonate with voters.
When a politician chooses to advocate taxing his/her constituents more on a daily basis, one does not have to be a petroleum engineer to figure out that votes will not come gushing in for that politico.
Finally, if politicians were really serious about battling climate change with taxes, they would propose a climate change reparations surcharge tax on asset wealth. The 'asset wealthy' being not only individuals who own Teslas, but also foundations, endowments, religious institutions, and any other organization responsible for directly (or indirectly) using large amounts of fossil fuels.
A climate surcharge on the asset-rich, which would be unable to pass the surcharge taxes onto the masses via price increases. The asset-rich who will then deservedly become the elites' role models for saving the climate from their own doomsday scenarios.
Importantly, the mass of voters - conservative or progressive - would likely support that type of climate change tax in a heartbeat.
Being all doom and gloom about it doesn't help. IMHO Branson has the right idea when he offered $3 million for airconditioning that's 5x as energy efficient.
https://globalcoolingprize.org/prize-details/criteria/
i.e. the solution is a million little improvements not one magic one. Air-conditioning being a huge energy waster that could easily be improved. If you can make a fridge to turn a heat difference into cold, you can make an air conditioner that can, so you can make a solar (heat) driven air conditioning. It just needs the initial funding.
Have to love all that actual real information contained in the sensational piece. Not anywhere in the linked article does it state anywhere an actual recorded temperature. Only in the video does one mention of a temperature in Greenland although no date is given.
So I really have to wonder about this climate change debate. I think there is a problem with the publishing process. You see, there is a sort of priesthood of style during peer review. Incorrect papers are somewhat more likely to be published because style is easier to follow than to produce a good result. As a result many papers with inaccuracies get published while there are probably a few excellent papers that are not accepted, when in fact they are more accurate than many published papers. I would like to see a study on that - an accurate study that is
Interesting he didn't do a damn thing about what he claimed was the gravest problem facing the country and humanity. He was too busy with his genocides in the middle east and north africa.
No hope. No change.
Localized phenomenon. That extended all the way down into the Antarctic.
The problem with "climate science" is that it's been corrupted before and twisted for money. It has also had too many false alarms ad incorrect models.
The fact is no human knows that answers or exact measurements.
Why not give up on the doomsday model and start asking people if they want to die of cancer or live in literally toxic environments.
Global warming is dead, move to a "clean environment, happy life" model instead.
After all, we all die and climate change over time is basically irrelevant.
Unfortunately you are wrong about the mwp. Grapes were grown in the islands offf Europe, up to Greenland. Implying a longer growing season. Which has shortened now, and we are starting to grow more less then 90 day crops. And renewable energy crops, which bodes I'll for people.
When you conclude an annual study and post the results for "hottest year on record" at the start of winter.
That's the one thing nobody will say. But as long as it hasn't actually happened, that's evidence that it can't possibly happen ever, and if it's your house that gets flooded, there's no problem at all.
So what's to worry, it's colder than it was before. See? It's not getting warmer, it's getting colder!
(And yes, this is sarcasm. It's actually pretty sad that it is necessary to explicitly say so...)
Hottest on record = evidence of warming.
Coldest on record = evidence of cooling.
Either both are true, or neither are. You don't get to say "this cold snap is not evidence but this warm one is."
So not the hottest year. It has been hotter before, is what you're saying?
Not only has it gotten colder, but to keep things alarmist they finished the study before counting winter.
This graph from the report is particularly scary: https://www.arctic.noaa.gov/Po...
Lemmings and sheeple, all following the Judas goat over the cliff.
Welll what else would you expect from millenials, such timid suck-ups afraid to step out of line.
1. Grapes were not grown in Greenland.
2. Grapes were grown in places that were not, until recenly, places that grapes were grown, but the wine made from them was bloody awful.
3. Vinyards in northern areas of Europe were largely associated with religious groups that didn't survive the reformation, at which point the cultivation was abandoned for reasons not associated with the climate.
People who only get paid if they raise alarm, raise alarm. News at 11.
So?
I don't respond to AC's.
It's sad to see Slashdot taken over by anti-science scumbags, posting as "Anonymous Cowards" and lying that Global Warming isn't happening even with evidence all over the place. And then there's the overwhelming support for GW in the scientific community. What do they know!
I have to admire the plucky band of billionaires, conspiracy nutbars and oil companies bravely fighting back against all that nasty, evil science. Of course, the downside is that their kids will line up to piss on their graves.
I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
Vikings did not document travel over the poles.
See subject: Why are "snowflakes" so scared of "global warming"? They already MELT under the pressure of life & geting warmer the process ACCELERATES even more, lmao...
* Picked that one up on /. yesterday & it made me lmao!
APK
P.S.=> Probably true too, RoTfLmAo - imagine that: The OUTRIGHT MASS-EXTINCTION EVENT that's needed where "GLOBAL WARMING" (horseshit imo, a doubtless millenia long cyclical event e.g. like the ice age, a proven occurrence too) DOES US ALL A GIGANTIC FAVOR ridding of us of their pestilence... apk
We are not measuring things on a geological scale, but in human terms. So your argument is invalid. During most of the 4.543 billion years that earths exists, it was not habitable by humans. And even during long periods when earth was more or less habitable, most places where people live now, were under water or otherwise inhabitable. Also, please google "xkcd 1732" and watch, then think again.
Having lived in Alaska, I take this as good news. Cold is bad
technical whipping boy, Occam's Strop (think about it...)
Tony Heller is so spot on: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j46mnIcz330&t=23s
10 years ago Al Gore assured us the Arctic would be ice free in 5 years. As long as the left wing gives air time to nut jobs like Al Gore, expect the right wing to scoff.
But, you say, you personally already scoff at Al Gore, and he's no longer given much air time? Sorry, the memory of his fame persists. Until the left wing stops with the hysterical predictions, the right wing won't take them seriously. So now it's the UN that says there's only 12 years left to cut fossil fuels, or it's TEOTWAWKI. 12 years from now when we're still muddling through, will they make a similar pronouncement?
Unfortunately I could not find any kind of documents (not even from warming denyers) that talk about anything you post there, maybe you can provide a source?
We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
Erh... no.
Looking around the web, I could not find anyone pointing towards "grapes from Greenland". Not even climate change deniers dared to try to run that story. The furthest north that we find an attempt to grow grapes is southern England. Grapes, by the way, are a rather poor measurement for how warm it was, simply for the fact that Christianity needs wine (and hence the grapes to make it) for its ceremonies. So even if the chance for success was close to zero or the quality simply atrocious, people would have tried to grow grapes, no matter the cost, the quality or the quantity of the outcome.
We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
Yes, 2016 was hotter and everybody died. Kidding aside, it wasn't a catastrophic event then and it is not one today.
I just got back from a week in Miami. 30 years ago the "climatologists" were predicting the Keys and a third of continental Florida would be underwater by now. Well gosh, to my surprise it hasn't happened yet. In fact almost nothing that has been predicted has happened. The visible negative effects of climate change is a moving target like sustainable fusion power-it's always 20-50 years away.
Maybe they should stop building along the coasts. Anyone with an IQ north of 90 should be able to deduce that shorelines always change regardless of the climate or human activity.
Underwater critters of the Permian age didn't need to farm to survive. Dinosaurs didn't need to farm to survive. Oh, and the Permian era critters are mostly dead, as are the dinosaurs.
100% of p51d "007" faggot's rant comes from the fact that he got a baseball bat stuck up his ass as a child and he STILL can't get it out.
Thank you for this important reminder, that the planet's climate can change — drastically and dramatically — with human involvement neither for nor against it.
In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
Obligatory: Earth Temperature Timeline, courtesy of XKCD.
2bits.com, Inc: Drupal, WordPress, and LAMP performance tuning.
No, no travel over the poles. They'd have had a hard time sailing over the southern one, even if they'd known it existed.
But, no, Lief Erikkson sailed to Newfoundland following the known course of Brenden the Navigator. And he was the furthest north.
Nobody sailed north of the north wind, as the Arctic region was known.
If deniers are resorting to fraudulent sagas, even they know they've lost the debate.
It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
You won't find them.
The claim is founded on assuming Greenland is Vinland from Lief Errikson's saga. In other words, a fraudulant saga.
It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
Irrevelant. It was warmer in the Jurassic because CO2 and O2 were greatly elevated, as was humidity, and the magnetosphere was three times as strong.
It was also constant. The Jurasic didn't warm up at a fantastic pace, things were ADAPTED to the conditions.
The biosphere was healthy and diverse, not massively degraded.
All these factors impact the significance of temperatures. But they're never considered by deniers in their bid to corrupt the data by eliminating the facts that don't fit their claims.
It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
Moving slowly in from the sea over 100-300 years isn't so difficult as buildings and roads age anyway, and 100-300 years from now, society will be less recognizable to today than today would be to people in 1900 or 1700.
I argue any draconian measures to arrest GW that slows technological progress will be of more harm than good.
I'd rather live in 2100 with year 2100 tech and gw than 2100 with a pristine environment and year 2080 tech, slowed due to drags on the economy.
The real enemy continues to be sickness and death.
(-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
No, they really weren't. Stop using Infowars as your encyclopedia. Find me a peer reviewed paper in a reputable journal that said that, with proof that other scientists backed the claim.
You won't find the paper.
That's because it exists only in fantasy.
Give over, you can live your life in fantasy but don't expect us to live in your fantasy too.
It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
There are not only two years on record, so the second hottest isn't really the coolest...
We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
It's interesting that there was no large drop in sea ice extent or area this year to match the exceptional warming. The numbers came in around where the last few years have, and much higher than 2016 or 2012.
Sea Ice Area: https://web.nersc.no/WebData/a...
Sea Ice Extent: https://web.nersc.no/WebData/a...
Especially given we're at the part in an 11 year solar cycle where it's *supposed* to be getting cooler than the year before.
GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
We have 100,000 years of data.
But don't let facrs detract from your scumbag fantasy world.
It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
We have 100,000 years of records.
It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
But they're all liars.
What he said was that when the WAIS and GIS melted (no timeframe), florida would be under several m of water.
Deniers just obey the bleats of their sheeplike masters, though, so don't care if it's BS. It sounds like what they want to hear, so they obey.
NOAA are liars too. Their science is a bunch of fake fabricated data to push the Rothschild banker syndicate "Man made global warming" agenda. The same exact thing as the IPCC. Except;
The IPCC are fake science junk data who are directly owned by the Rothchilds had the NOAA release this "science alert" since IPCC created the completely fake and fabricated their data into a Hockey Stick Graph
Enjoy your Hockey Stick graph slashdot, you stupid n i g g e r. You parrot repeating CNN loving cunts will eventually die.
So what your saying we had someone monitoring the temperature in the arctic and recording it for the last 100,000 years? Did you even bother reading the article? It says since 1900. I was arguing the that its a ridiculous assumption to assume that since a high temperature value was recorded that means global warming is actually happening that's very terrible science. Because this is what this article of propaganda is really about. Since you're to lazy to actually read I posted it below for you.
"According to a new report released on Tuesday by the U.S. National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration, the Arctic had its second-hottest year on record in 2018. "Arctic air temperatures for the past five years have exceeded all previous records since 1900," according to the annual NOAA study, the 2018 Arctic Report Card, which said the year was second only to 2016 in overall warmth in the region. Reuters reports:"
So the last 120 years got warm. Tuff titty for those drowning PagoPago Islanders. Weather is a bitch. Same with warmist Trotsky-sluts. Choke on a tofu-puff snowflakes. Then, in a couple-a thousand years get back to me with a climate report. Next Ice-Age should be starting and mink-jackets in fashion. Until then ... wear a feckin-A condom when it rains.
And you can't do anything about it warmist bitchboi ... temps go up-down and water goes back-forth. Don't build where it floods and don't populate with nibbaz what you can't feed from white efforts. But ... grab-for-power with an eco-excuse. Yeah you can try that and I can smash yo face for the trouble.
"Don't want to go back to the dinosaurs as usual to show just how warm earth can be and still sustain life?"
Of course it can sustain life - just not HUMAN life.
There were no humans during the dinosaur age.
But if we are talking about the arctic then we are talking about WEATHER and not CLIMATE.
As has been said over and over, local weather is not proof of climate change or the lack of climate change.
You might not be aware but none of us care about your arbitrary definition of words. If the original statements were not clear to you, then ask for clarification to resolve ambiguity. Snide remarks and personal attacks doesn't make you look like the genius in this thread.
Where is your evidence that incorrect papers are more likely to be published? It's a bold claim.
The risk isn't just a bit of sea level rise, but significant changes to ecosystems which might result in the loss of a number of ecosystem services. If the cost of reducing CO2 emissions is less than the cost of replacing those ecosystem services with artificial versions, then the pragmatic option is to reduce CO2 emissions. Examples of such services including things like pollination by bees. If services are lost and can only be replaced by more expensive options then there would be GW and a drag on the economy. And whilst it might be possible to replace pollination by bees with a technological option, you also have to take into account the risk that it may not be, and so that can mean that caution is advisable.
No, they really weren't. Stop using Infowars as your encyclopedia. Find me a peer reviewed paper in a reputable journal that said that
I think he was using Al Gore as his source; that's who made the outrageous claims about things being underwater by now.
When did he say that? Link or STFU.
I'm going to ignore the rest of the shocking ignorance of this post and ask what makes you think we have to halt all technological progress to correct AGW? The tech that is causing the problem was literally invented in the 19th century! If anything, combating AGW will force us to use 21st century tech.
Also, a little fact about the economy, it works best when the money keeps moving. Like when you replace all your old crap by buying new crap.
But if we are talking about the arctic then we are talking about WEATHER and not CLIMATE.
As has been said over and over, local weather is not proof of climate change or the lack of climate change.
climate - noun - the weather conditions prevailing in an area in general or over a long period.
Perhaps you are thinking of global warming? (which, as the name suggests, refers to global average temperature and is not specific to any particular region).
You need to read my post again. I'm saying that abrupt changes in climate are what's actually damaging to the biosphere. I used the end-Permian extinction as an example, where the warming probably took place over about 20,000 years. That's extremely fast compared to the scale of geologic time, and for comparison, the recovery probably took about 10 million years. The warming that's occurring now is also incredibly abrupt, which is why it's so concerning. It's difficult to determine the precise causes of the end-Permian extinction, but as I've learned more about it and seen some of the recent research, it seems to me that there are some parallels to what we're doing now. I'm not a denier and, in fact, was refuting the OP.
Not sure that he did, but: "In 2017, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) found that cities around the country experienced a record number of flooding events related to high tides, according to the National Climate Report. More than a quarter of coastal locations tied or set new records for the number of flooding days. And in 2018, flooding on the US coastline is expected to be 60% higher than it was just 20 years ago." - https://www.businessinsider.co...
Vineland, that actually comes indeed from "wine". But it was not wine made from grapes but berries.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Vineland never was mixed up with Greenland. Greenland is Greenland, as it was much greener than Iceland (which where not icy, but barren at that time, more or less like today anyway). However for the sake of the Saga, you can see the narrative arc: ice, green, wine.
angel'o'sphere
You insensitive clod! I'm 800m above sea level! Of course I care if it gets washed away in a flood! But most likely this are never was sea level but part of the mantle of the earth ... anyway ...
angel'o'sphere
Except that it didn't. From what we can tell today, it was a period of non-homogeneous slight variations in temperature. Today Britain, tomorrow Black Sea. The reason for which is still mostly a mystery, but what can be said is that whatever caused it was mostly concentrated in the northern hemisphere, and here in Eurasia.
We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
That's pretty much the point.
There was also life on Earth during the Late Bombardment period. And boy, you better believe it was warmer than today! With MUCH higher CO2 and MUCH lower (read: zero) Oxygen levels.
We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
I hear that the government is hiding all the satellite data from the forties that proves that it.is all a scam conspiracy of the nazi commie Hindu Muslims trying to come and steal our women and freedom.
#infowars #believe
Flooding? Exactly where? I have been visiting the exact same spot on the Oregon coast since 1962. There have been exactly ZERO examples of any mitigation needed for sea level rise. Not one person has had to do shit because of SLR. Pick another catastrophe please, SLR is just not a problem. When you come up with shit like this, the so called deniers are correct, you dont know what you are talking about and are just on the effing bandwagon. Please POST the SLR numbers on existing tide gauges that show this SLR. Bloody hell......
Hey, dumbfuck: sea level rise isn't consistent everywhere. Learn something. Read an IPCC report.
I don't respond to AC's.
"So what your saying we had someone monitoring the temperature in the arctic and recording it for the last 100,000 years?"
Before there was Ice Cube, in fact before there were ice cubes, there was just ice. That ice effectively stored climate data for us, which we have subsequently learned to decode. I'm talking to you like a child because you're acting like one. Adult up, son.
"You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
We're aware arth1 "idiot savant" (lol) = "Run, Forrest: RUN!!!" vs. https://linux.slashdot.org/com... & why: SOLID PROOF & TECH REASONS why ANY linux distro (a modern KUbuntu 18.04 LTS proves you wrong) would be STUPID ENOUGH to do DNS before file (hosts) in nsswitch as you said.
Especilally when I prove systemd (in most modern Linux) DEFAULTS to a more than potentially kaminsky flaw redirected ISP DNS!
(Which most will use by default unlike myself shifting to OpenDNS & most modems supplied by ISP's by default don't allow DNS change IN THE MODEM itself (which I just went thru getting 2 in a row that don't allow it - heck, 1 by technicolor from SPECTRUM (timewarner in my area formerly) DIDN'T EVEN ALLOW ME, or the remote TECHS mind you, INTO IT @ ALL (China supplied no less)).
APK
P.S.=> Answer that wannabe "sysadmin" (who I annihilate in that link & others)... apk