Slashdot Mirror


Louisiana Adopts Digital Driver's Licenses (ieee.org)

Louisiana is rolling out a new digital driver's license app, called LA Wallet, that will let retailers digitally verify the age of their customers, if required. "According to IEEE Spectrum, Louisiana's Office of Alcohol and Tobacco Control is expected to announce that bars, restaurants, grocery stores and other retails are allowed to accept LA Wallet as proof of age, according to the app's developer, Envoc." From the report: The Baton Rouge-based company launched LA Wallet in June, after two years of collaboration with state officials. But so far only law enforcement officers making routine traffic stops are required to accept the digital driver's license. Next week's announcement would greatly broaden the scope of the app's use. About 71,000 people have downloaded LA Wallet so far, says Calvin Fabre, founder and president of Envoc. The app costs $5.99 in the Google Play and Apple App stores. Users buy it, create an account with some basic information from their physical driver's license, and create a password. That's it. No biometric security -- like iris scans or facial recognition -- required. The app links back to Louisiana's Office of Motor Vehicles database, which completes the digital license with the user's photo and additional information. Any changes to the license, like a suspension or renewal, are updated immediately in the app with a wireless network connection.

To present the license -- say, to a cop during a traffic stop -- the driver (hoping his phone battery isn't dead) opens the app with a password, shows the cop the digital license image, and authenticates it by pressing and holding the screen to reveal a security seal. The license can be flipped over to show a scannable bar code on the back. There's also a handy security feature that allows anyone with the LA Wallet app to authenticate another person's Louisiana digital driver's license. It allows the bar patron to select which information she would like to reveal to the bartender -- in this case, simply the fact that she is over 21. That information is displayed on the phone with a photo and embedded QR code. The bartender scans the code with her app, which tells her that the woman seated on the other side of the bar is indeed over 21. None of the customer's personal information, such as her name, birth date, or address, is displayed or stored on the bartender's phone.

151 comments

  1. Clever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Here's my unlocked phone, officer.

    1. Re:Clever by ELCouz · · Score: 0

      Mod AC up! Insightful +9999

    2. Re:Clever by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Here's my unlocked phone, officer.

      Obvious solution: You could make the digital license the wallpaper on your lock screen.

    3. Re:Clever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Another obvious solution is to print out your digital license, laminate it, and keep it in your wallet.

    4. Re:Clever by novakyu · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Wouldn't it be easier to have DMV print it on plastic for you?

    5. Re:Clever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's my unlocked phone that's not filming you beating the crap out of me.

    6. Re:Clever by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it be easier to have DMV print it on plastic for you?

      It's a crazy idea but it just might work!

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    7. Re:Clever by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      It sure would seem so.

      Maybe there's something I'm missing, but this appears to be one of the stupidest ideas I've read about all year.

    8. Re:Clever by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Officer, officer someone just stole my phone. Officer and who are you? How about, we are a private corporation with the right to deny business with anyone at any time, the right to turn people into non-people. Electronic ID and electronic payments with cash banned, corporations with the right to decide who does exist and who does not, what could go wrong (well we all know, as far as those psychopathic cunts are concerned, what could go right, mwa hah hah)

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    9. Re:Clever by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

      Maybe there's something I'm missing, but this appears to be one of the stupidest ideas I've read about all year.

      Oh no, you've got it all wrong! This was very well thought out.

      You see, corrupt DMV workers and LEOs were not capable of selling personal data fast enough to meet demand the old way, now they can receive far more in payoffs and can blame the loss of confidential data on "hackers"...probably Russian. /s

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    10. Re:Clever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Boring faggot makes up boring shit, news at 11"

    11. Re:Clever by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      I was making an alcohol purchase the other at a store here in LA.

      They asked for my ID, and I gave my license, and rather than just look at the date/age...they freakin' scanned it before I could say anything.

      I'd never had that happened before and saw they were using some type bar code on back.

      I"m gonna have to get some tape or something to cover that, as that I don't want them able to put that info in their database.

      Anyone else run into this?

      I"m certainly NOT going to get the electronic version on my phone, for many of the reasons just stated.

      I was shocked to have my analog license scanned for the first time.....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    12. Re:Clever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only fully loaded moron & idiot that has nothing to loose should be allowed to user this app, cmon guys how stupid you need to be for this?

    13. Re:Clever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've worked at several convenience stores in Louisiana and some have been doing this since the late 90s. The idea is that it rejects fake and expired id's also prevents "misread" id's. I don't know about now, but in the early days it was a stand alone device not conected to anything that just read the mag stripe. I'm old enough now that I rarely get id'd anymore.

    14. Re:Clever by w0ahbreh · · Score: 1

      Your comment doesnt make any sense. If you read the website, it says it's a hands off experience. LE cant go through your phone without a warrant. Additionally, depending upon the type of phone you have, you can pin the app to the screen where you can hand them the phone and they are only able to interact with whatever app/screen you pin to your device. If they try to exit out of it, it goes back to the lock screen. On Android its called Screen Pinning and on iOS its called Guided Access. Super useful features.

    15. Re:Clever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's God's way of telling you Just Say No to Alcohol. Heed it.

    16. Re:Clever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I will no longer hand my identifying documents to anyone who isn't law enforcement. They can read it while I hold it, but they may not take it out of my control.

      I also have a piece of tape over the serial number of each. They must ask me to remove it.

      Walmart and several other large chains are now asking for an ID - whose serial number they enter into their computer - when you purchase money orders. I found this out the hard way when they asked for my ID, then punched in the number before I realised what they were doing. I was LIVID. Now Walmart have more PII about me without my consent, and there isn't a bloody thing I can do about it.

    17. Re:Clever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't it be easier to have DMV print it on plastic for you?

      Clever Hans, is that you?

    18. Re:Clever by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

      I will no longer hand my identifying documents to anyone who isn't law enforcement.

      If the officer cannot articulate a specific law you've broken or crime he reasonably suspects you've committed, you are not legally required to produce ID, but in most places you are required to truthfully state your full name and address if asked by police. This non-legal (IANAL etc) advice does not apply when operating a motor vehicle on public roadways, although you do still have rights even then, however. It's sort of like answering questions from police...generally not advised by all the lawyers I've heard/read speak on the subject. Police cannot just walk up and demand you produce ID because you make them feel some kind of way.

      There are a number of good videos on YT about when police may legally demand you produce ID. Know your rights. The police will lie to you, evem about the law and your rights. It's up to each of us to know and exercise our rights or they will most assuredly disappear.

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
  2. La Wallet by jfdavis668 · · Score: 4, Funny

    How very French of them.

    1. Re:La Wallet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Hackers Paradise is now open for business...

    2. Re:La Wallet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now all it needs is Are-You-18-Or-Older (tm) functionality.

    3. Re:La Wallet by Toshito · · Score: 1

      The only problem is that the french word for Wallet:"Portefeuille" is masculine.

      So it should be "Le Wallet"

      "La" is feminine.

      --
      Try it! Library of Babel
    4. Re:La Wallet by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

      In Louisiana, wallets are only made from female alligator skin.

  3. It will be hacked... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It will be hacked in 3...2...1...

    1. Re:It will be hacked... by Fly+Swatter · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding, this is the internet age. It was hacked or fake-apped before you typed the first dot of your ellipsis in the title.

  4. it's a scam.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    to get people to willingly hand over their UNLOCKED phones to law enforcement.

    1. Re:it's a scam.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you install it on a old ipod touch?

    2. Re:it's a scam.. by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 1

      Why an old iPod Touch? You can get a no-contract current Android phone for under $30 without even looking hard. For less if you shop around a bit. They work fine on wi-fi to set up whatever is needed.

    3. Re:it's a scam.. by KixWooder · · Score: 1

      Or you could just hand them a plastic id like you currently have.

      --
      I hate fat people.
    4. Re:it's a scam.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh pls just stop with the complicated BULLSHIT! Where the fuck am I supposed to get plastic?

      Now, with that $30 android, can be buy some type of backup battery that will keep the phone perpetually charged but won't draw current while the car is off but will charge itself when the car is on? Schematics people, I need them!!!

    5. Re:it's a scam.. by quonset · · Score: 2

      Or you could just hand them a plastic id like you currently have.

      Au contraire, mon frere. This is digital! It's better. Everything is better when it's digital.

      Just like the recent article where businesses are no longer accepting cash, and someone said a person could always go down the block and turn their ready cash into a plastic card, it makes no sense to simply turn over something you already have. Nowadays you have to go digital. Digital is where it's at.

      Think about it. Now you get to whip out your phone, unlock it (hoping you did it right the first time), find the app, wait for it to load, most likely sign into the app or in some other method identify yourself, then, and ONLY then, can you produce your identification. Now compare that to handing over a card: pull out your wallet, find the card, present the card.

      Clearly digital is the way to go. Why? Because it's digital!

    6. Re:it's a scam.. by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 1

      I was speaking more to a time in the future when the digital license is the only option. But who am I kidding? By then we will all be assigned our 'phone number' at birth.

    7. Re:it's a scam.. by Ambvai · · Score: 1

      I'm more likely to leave my ID behind than my phone: Just the other day, I was trying to cash out 5-digits at my local casino: They wanted to verify ID, and I realized I left my wallet in my car. I got a security escort, casino management, and police escorting me to my car. And they already have all my info on file anyways.

    8. Re:it's a scam.. by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Lucky your car and id were still there.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    9. Re: it's a scam.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. Hook up a P-mosfet gate with pull up resistor and put a BJT base-emitter on the ground side of an indicator light that only turns on while the car is running, then put the gate on the collector. If there is voltage then the BJT will drop the gate and turn on the P MOSFET.

    10. Re:it's a scam.. by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

      No shit, here in vegas they would likely arrest you on john doe charges had your car been stolen in the parking lot. unless you parked within one of the few garage cameras view that could have witnessed the thievery. Than you would have to have someone bring you an id, and even then they have 72 hours until they have to admit they were given your ID. Now, if you are a criminal and happen to have made it onto gang file. tattoo's can be your ID here, at least for the cops. Crazy right...

    11. Re:it's a scam.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because I already have an old iPod Touch, duh.

    12. Re:it's a scam.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The phone that has plastic in it?

  5. the phone needs to be unlocked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    If the mobile device needs to be unlocked to present the information (regardless of the status of the app and license itself), then in many cases Law Enforcement has already bypassed the initial roadblock to getting a user to unlock his/her phone to access other data on it.

    If, on the other hand, this is available from the lock screen (with the mentioned additional authentication), much like a payment card via Apple Wallet or similar capabilities, then it's pretty convenient without an obvious security circumvention issue.

    I didn't see an indication in the article or on the app delveloper's site to indicate which of these options is the case.

  6. Do Not Want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Next. -->

  7. Big Brother by Joviex · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Tracks you, tracks your purchases for gov, and provides "unlockable" phones for cops when pulled over.

    How about a big fat NO FUCKING THANKS

    Good times.

    1. Re:Big Brother by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2

      Good part is that it will become a lot easier to "clone" the license of your 21-year old friend who looks almost like you. No biometrics required :D Maybe this will finally be the death rattle of the idiotic drinking age in the US.

    2. Re:Big Brother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would like to be there when the cop asks for your phone and you say no.

      I am wondering if you will scream when you are thrown to the ground, when you are beaten, or finally handcuffed.

    3. Re:Big Brother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to be there when said cop is hit by a speeding drunk driver as he's preparing to open your door and drag you out. *THUMP* *tinkle* SCREEEEEEEEEEEEE! OWOWWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA heeeeeeelp!

    4. Re:Big Brother by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 1

      That sucks, the cop is dead, but the door of your car is mangled beside him.

  8. Re: GAY NIGGERS FROM OUTER SPACE GNAA GNAA GNAA by TimMD909 · · Score: 0

    One should not feed the trolls.

  9. In NYS... by Iwastheone · · Score: 2

    In NY State I no longer need to "prove 12 points of my identity". The DMV Clerks check my pic to, "Yup, that's him." Been that way for a few years now.

    1. Re:In NYS... by turp182 · · Score: 1

      Now that's sanity.

      In Missouri, to renew my license, I needed:
      1. Old license
      2. Proof of identity (I had my original SS card and valid passport - the passport could have been expired)
      3. Valid insurance card
      4. Recent bill with my name and address (90 days old or less)

      It was stupid but I came prepared and it did go quickly. I was given a full size sheet of paper as a temporary license, which I laminated and carried around in the car.

      I almost want to get a tatoo of my birth certificate and SS card. Yeah, this is who I am!

      --
      BlameBillCosby.com
    2. Re:In NYS... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find in strange that you mention living in NY so often since there is a renowned Slashdot collaborator that fantasize about living in NY too, just like Billy the Mountain and Ethell always dreamed about going to NY. As he puts it himself;

      Because of the quality of my posts and my article submissions, I'm a highly rated commentator and moderator.

      He also adds:

      I have a hearing loss in one ear, so my audio will always be suspect. I use a Zoom H2 audio recorder with a pop filter 12" away from my mouth, Audacity to clean up and normalize the audio, and sync the audio to the video and apply a "voice enhancement" eq to the audio in the video editor.

      I take public transit. A local bus take me down the street to pick up the express bus, the express bus drops me off in Palo Alto, and a local bus take me down the street to my job. An hour each way. Driving through Palo Alto during rush hour is insane. Since I work in government I.T., I start work at 7:00AM.

      And guess what? Just like you do, he suggests to flood Slashdot with submissions in order to get karma!

      Strange, very weird...

    3. Re:In NYS... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In NY State I no longer need to "prove 12 points of my identity". The DMV Clerks check my pic to, "Yup, that's him." Been that way for a few years now.

      In NY State I no longer need to "prove 12 points of my identity". The DMV Clerks check my pic to, "Yup, that's him." Been that way for a few years now.

      I'm 99.9% sure you're wrong, or at least misleading people.

      https://dmv.ny.gov/driver-license/get-learner-permit
      Find your proofs: https://process.dmv.ny.gov/documentguide/

      IE: For a new ID, you still need to show those 12 points.

      The reason you no longer have to (ie. when renewing) is because your existing NY ID counts as a BUNCH of points. That only makes sense, since you had to prove your ID to get it.
      When applying for a new NY ID, using a passport or a valid ID from another state (can't be expired for more than 2 years - I found that out the hard way) counts as a bunch of points too. If you step through that "Find your proofs" link above, and pretend you don't have a license from any state, or valid ID from any state, nor a password, it's still a pain in the ass to come up with enough points of proof of ID.

    4. Re:In NYS... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At what point did he say "For a new ID"? Anyone with an inch of reading comprehension saw " I no longer need". You yourself mention the reason as well. Where is the misleading?

    5. Re:In NYS... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're always misleading creimer! Take for example these stupid New York stories you write about here while you have never been there, you delusional sick fuck.

    6. Re:In NYS... by Iwastheone · · Score: 1

      Allow me to ensure you that I am none of the above. I go back about 10 years back since Iwastheone was the ; sternishefan : here.

  10. Waste of fucking money ... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Instead of spending a lot of time and effort creating a system to enforce Puritanical drinking age regulations, lower the drinking age to 18 and don't require people "show their papers" just to be able to buy a pint of beer. It works like this in most of the non-Islamic world, and the world outside the US mostly gets by just fine. Governments spend a lot more time than is sane trying to enforce rules against victimless crimes.

    1. Re:Waste of fucking money ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why 18? If a kid is responsible enough to hold on to/earn money, let em buy it.

    2. Re:Waste of fucking money ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny thing is that, for a brief time, it was 18 in the USA.
      The reason was that if you were old enough to be killed for
      the government (Vietnam "war"), you're old enough to drink.

      Dunno exact reason why it went up to 21 again, maybe
      'cause the draft ended (too long ago).

      CAP === 'mouthed'

    3. Re:Waste of fucking money ... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      No, it went up to 21 in the 80s -- Mothers Against Drunk Driving campaigned for it "for the cheeeeeeeeldren" until they got what they wanted. And the Feds were more than happy to oblige by cutting off highway funding to states that didn't toe the line.

    4. Re:Waste of fucking money ... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      It was never universally 18. Some states were 18, some were 18 for beer, some were 18 for 3.2% beer.

      God damn MADD mothers ended it. Along with redefining 'drunk' to 'having lips that EVER touched alcohol'.

      IMHO the main thing should be separate ages for driving and drinking. Learning how to do both at the same time is just asking for trouble. Let 15 year olds puke like drunken 15 year olds, but make them wait until 21 to drive.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    5. Re:Waste of fucking money ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Use the proper term. "Sows", not "mothers." I like dogs too much to compare them to bitches, and a cunt is too nice of a thing to compare to a Puritanical sow.

    6. Re:Waste of fucking money ... by Woldscum · · Score: 1

      No it was actually under Bill Clinton. The Feds withheld Highway funds from states that did not raise the age to 21.
      https://www.nytimes.com/1996/0...

    7. Re:Waste of fucking money ... by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 1

      It was 18 when I was a 17 year old college freshman. Boy was I pissed.

    8. Re:Waste of fucking money ... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      They tried that, kids got drunk and killed people behind the wheel. Try again.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    9. Re:Waste of fucking money ... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2

      So strictly enforce drunk driving laws for new drivers: 0.01% BAC = license loss till 21. Or just require self-driving cars.

    10. Re:Waste of fucking money ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was 18 when I was a 17 year old college freshman. Boy was I pissed.

      I didn't know Kavanaugh posted here... He was piss drunk every weekend it seems.

    11. Re:Waste of fucking money ... by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      to get rid of Puritanical thinking, you have to reduce the power of the current Puritan party. that's the one that starts with an R.

      the Puritans were uptight, religious nutjobs that even overly religious europe said 'good riddance!' to. the R's match that the closest.

      they gave in on liquor but they are still fighting the pot battle (and losing, really badly, country-wide).

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    12. Re:Waste of fucking money ... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough, the original Puritans (the Pilgrims) actually had a taste for beer.

    13. Re:Waste of fucking money ... by CaptQuark · · Score: 1

      I guess you didn't even read your own link. It was talking about Louisiana being the last holdout to not comply with the 1984 National Minimum Drinking Age Act, which coerces states to set their legal drinking age at 21 or risk loosing 10% of the federal highway funds. That happened during the Reagan administration, a decade before Carter was president.

      Several studies, including a 2011 review, were found to disprove the idea that raising the drinking age to 21 actually saved lives in the long run. See the Wikipedia article for citations. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    14. Re:Waste of fucking money ... by RoccamOccam · · Score: 1

      That happened during the Reagan administration, a decade before Carter was president.

      A little typo. Clinton.

    15. Re:Waste of fucking money ... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The younger generation are screwed enough and now you want to remove from them another enabler for them to become self sufficient (the ability to actually go to their job/university)?

      What a dumb idea. Why not solve the drinking problem rather than screw the responsible people? You'll notice in many countries where alcohol policies aren't as strict, getting shitfaced right when you're old enough to drink ceases being a national passtime.

    16. Re:Waste of fucking money ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So instead of forcing people to show their papers to prove they are 21+ we'll force them to show their papers to prove they're 18+. What a progress. Let me guess, you're a liberal? Because that certainly looks like a liberal's idea of "deregulation".

    17. Re:Waste of fucking money ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They didn't have "a taste for beer". They had to drink beer because the water couldn't be trusted.

    18. Re:Waste of fucking money ... by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 1

      You've misspelled Kennedy.

    19. Re:Waste of fucking money ... by Woldscum · · Score: 1

      No the Clinton Whitehouse withheld the Highway money all on their own. The added it into the US budget.

    20. Re:Waste of fucking money ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that so many of the first people to settle in the US were religious fanatics who didn't want to just practice their religion in peace but wanted to force their beliefs on everyone else. Why does that sound familiar...

    21. Re:Waste of fucking money ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kavanaugh is the new Kennedy

    22. Re:Waste of fucking money ... by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 1

      Ted and Brett would have had a hell of a party together, that's for certain. As long as they stayed away from politics.

    23. Re: Waste of fucking money ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is batshit crazy in the USA is retailers claiming with a straight face that they ID anyone 40 or under. The rest of the civilized world with drinking ages of 18 typically claim they ID anyone 25 or under. See the difference?

    24. Re:Waste of fucking money ... by CaptQuark · · Score: 1

      Oops! Thanks for catching that!

    25. Re:Waste of fucking money ... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      You'll also note many other countries with loose drinking laws and even worse idiot kids drinking till they puke. England and Scotland come to mind, likely two of America's closest cultural cousins.

      All I'm saying is let the kids get their first 1000 hours drinking done before they start their first 1000 hours driving. Make the ages 14 and 18 if you like.

      Also note: Making the legal age for drinking 21 is counterproductive. They still start drinking about 14-15 and drive shortly after.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    26. Re:Waste of fucking money ... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Because that was exactly like their nations of origin, except they were the odd ones back in the 'old country'.

      At least America didn't have a 'national religion'. Granting a few of the original states did, they had to remove their legal status shortly after independence.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    27. Re:Waste of fucking money ... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      'Useless festering dry cunts'.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    28. Re:Waste of fucking money ... by Agripa · · Score: 1

      Hey now, those court rooms and prisons are not going to fill themselves.

  11. Usual privacy policy... by bagofbeans · · Score: 2

    The LA WALLET Application... Privacy Policy describes what personal data we obtain through the Application and how we use, store and share that information... note that ENVOC may change the terms of its Privacy Policy at any time without prior notice to you

    1. Re:Usual privacy policy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "we have altered the deal. pray we don't alter it further" - Darth Vader

  12. Why? What problem are they trying to solve? by schwit1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How is this better than a physical document? This looks more like an attempt at showing off how cutting edge they are.

    Our K-12 schools are shite but we issue digital driver's license.

    1. Re:Why? What problem are they trying to solve? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      It's worse -- it's arguably easier to clone, since it doesn't have security features of a plastic license. As far as phoning home to DMV to verify, a plastic license can also have a scannable barcode.

      Then again, anything that weakens security is a good thing IMHO. US drinking age laws are a stupid joke. Too much time, money, and effort are spent in enforcing them. May as well turn them into a COMPLETE joke while we're at it.

      The more holes in the system, the better.

    2. Re:Why? What problem are they trying to solve? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "problems" they solve:

      1. They can track everyone's vices in great detail
      2. cops have excuse to snoop your unlocked phone

      Nailed it!

    3. Re:Why? What problem are they trying to solve? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Illegal migrants using one granted "state" ID to build a federal ID and get more services and support from a city/state/federal US gov.
      Criminals trying to create a new past with a new state ID.
      People who need a new state ID for new fraud and deception attempts.

      A state ID in different parts of the USA was a great way for illegal migrants and other criminals to work on getting services, support and more US ID.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    4. Re:Why? What problem are they trying to solve? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      How does this "solve" anything of that type? Plastic ID can already be "verified" with the appropriate agency, but generally requires appearance in person to obtain. This doesn't require a personal appearance, just obtaining the appropriate credentials to log in to the app, nor is it biometric.

      This is actually LESS secure than a paper ID. This being said, with the US justice and immigration systems being as fucked up and harsh as they are, I actually support criminals being able to escape justice and illegal immigrants being able to forge an identity. So maybe this is a good thing.

    5. Re:Why? What problem are they trying to solve? by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Save money..... no more printing plastic cards. I imagine for version 2.0... no more visits to the DMV office -- possibly 80% of DMV employees no longer needed: Just take an interactive vision test on your phone, type in a credit card number to send the $25 plus $3 convenience fee, and your license is renewed for 4 more years.

      I'm sure the 3rd party company providing the app gets all kinds of data collection and advertising opportunities by having their app on customers' phones. I wonder if the state will receive monetary compensation from the 3rd party company for that to help further lower DMV/OMV costs.

    6. Re:Why? What problem are they trying to solve? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      A new ID system might just escape some of the past strong city/state privacy laws that protected US citizens from deeper state/federal database sharing .
      A "new" digital method could see a lot more new sharing of data at a city, sate and federal level allowing for the discovery of illegal migrates and other criminals.
      Criminals and illegal migrants who still expected a city and state "ID" to still be politically part of a "Sanctuary city" and would be an easy path to further build fake US citizenship ID.

      The aspect of "LESS secure than a paper ID" was the expected state vs federal privacy protections and activist political protections some US city and states offered for a state ID.
      A new ID system might be a great way of finally connecting more ID systems and detecting illegal migrants and other criminals. Digital networks vs past state kept "paper" can share a lot more networked data all over the USA :)

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    7. Re:Why? What problem are they trying to solve? by Xenx · · Score: 0

      Honestly, it's idiocy to want to let teens drink. It is better for them, developmentally, to not be drinking at that age. That doesn't even cover the fact that their age bracket is more prone to binge drinking and taking unnecessary risks even without alcohol. While the law may not be perfect, we have a much lower drinking and binge drinking rate among teens in the US vs Europe. The law also has greatly reduced the number of drinking related hospital visits and traffic accidents for that bracket.

    8. Re:Why? What problem are they trying to solve? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Honestly, it's idiocy to want to control every fucking iota of people's lives, you little statist snit. Outcomes (life expectancies and other measures of health) are generally better in Europe than the US. Why? Because a controlled society is a stressed society, and a stressed society is an unhealthy one. Let people have their vices, don't try to micro-manage.

    9. Re:Why? What problem are they trying to solve? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 0

      So you're against protecting US citizens' privacy. Nice to know -- are the Russians or the Chinese paying you to troll on here?

    10. Re:Why? What problem are they trying to solve? by Drethon · · Score: 1

      How is this better than a physical document? This looks more like an attempt at showing off how cutting edge they are.

      Our K-12 schools are shite but we issue digital driver's license.

      Should be good when someone is killed in a car accident and the need to identify the driver. Another excuse to make it easier for law enforcement to be able to unlock your phone?

    11. Re:Why? What problem are they trying to solve? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Past efforts at state ID systems saw the problems with sanctuary city ID, use by illegal migrants and fraud.
      The new systems should help detect illegal migrants and prevent further criminal use of a new ID.
      US citizens' privacy will be ok as they are not criminals, illegal migrants.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    12. Re:Why? What problem are they trying to solve? by Xenx · · Score: 0

      At least I'm not the one that has to deride someone to feel better about myself. For those that might feel I did target him, I specifically targeted the idea and not the person. Smart people aren't smart 100% of the time. I gave him the benefit of the doubt and only said the idea was idiocy, which apparently I shouldn't have.

      As to the actual issue, it isn't a matter of controlling people. I already covered a number of the reasons for why it should remain in place, that have nothing to do with trying to control people. You have provided nothing except an insult and your reasoning of "you can't tell me what I can't do."

    13. Re:Why? What problem are they trying to solve? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      There are always "good reasons" for wanting to micro-manage people's lives. It doesn't make it right or acceptable to do so. Fuck off, statist.

    14. Re:Why? What problem are they trying to solve? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      A "criminal" is what a bunch of old fucks who managed to con their way into office or onto a judge's bench say is a criminal. You're a good citizen today, but you might become a criminal tomorrow. Thus, I'm all for making the job of the government harder and more onerous. The more cracks in the system there are, the harder it is for them to become completely overbearing.

    15. Re:Why? What problem are they trying to solve? by Xenx · · Score: 1

      If you have a legitimate argument to make, by all means... go ahead. Otherwise, stop making yourself look like an idiot.

    16. Re:Why? What problem are they trying to solve? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      I have a legitimate argument to make -- if people aren't micro-managed "for their own good", they end up being happier, less stressed, and healthier as a result. Look at outcomes (life expectancy, general health) in the US vs most of Europe, and you'll see this is the case. Should we also ban things like bicycling or skiing under 21 because under-21s "aren't fully mature" and might be hurt?

    17. Re:Why? What problem are they trying to solve? by Xenx · · Score: 1

      Correlation does not equal causation. Three of the major causes for our lower life expectancy: drug poisoning(alcohol included) , gun related injuries, and auto accidents. Accidents were greatly reduced when the drinking age was raised to 21. This was a near immediate change, so not predominately due to outside factors. So, that is a improvement to our expectancy in this case. That leaves drugs and gun related injuries. I don't know how many people turn to drugs due to stress caused/increased by all the laws placed upon them. But, one thing I am aware of is that addiction is one of the potential developmental factors negatively impacted by teenage drinking. That means allowing teens to drink increases their risk of addiction at a physical level. I don't want to imply causation. I'm just pointing out that they're going be at greater risk of addiction, putting them at greater risk of OD. I'm not comfortable talking gun related injuries, as I just don't have enough information to really be making any kind of argument either way on it. Finally, I will say that on top of the three largest factors, we also have a higher rate of smoking related deaths and a higher rate of death among infants.

      Basically, what I'm getting at is that I'm sure technically speaking some people are negatively impacted by the current drinking age. I understand your argument is that the act of restricting in general is the issue, and that this is only one instance. That being said, I still think your argument doesn't pass muster. The very real and quantifiable benefits of the current drinking age outweigh any perceived potential benefits of reducing it.

    18. Re:Why? What problem are they trying to solve? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      You assume that I actually have a problem with a greater number of drunk driving deaths or more addiction. I frankly don't. I'd rather live in a loosely-controlled but less safe society than a more-controlled but safer one. I'm not a coward.

    19. Re:Why? What problem are they trying to solve? by Xenx · · Score: 1

      I don't assume you have a problem with it. I just know most people have a problem with it. At least when it specifically comes to the drinking age, 86%(if I recall the number correctly) agree with it.

    20. Re:Why? What problem are they trying to solve? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It probably has less to do with controlling people's lives and more to do with universal healthcare. The stress of being controlled doesn't make a society unhealthy. Being unable to see a doctor sure does. People are, over the age of 21, allowed many vices here in the US, from legal hookers to drinking to smoking to porn, etc etc. Coming soon is legal pot, it's already there in many states.

    21. Re:Why? What problem are they trying to solve? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      86% of Dumbericans are Puritanical dolts and bootlicking authoritarian scum.

    22. Re:Why? What problem are they trying to solve? by Wrath0fb0b · · Score: 1

      If this were universally accepted, I would gladly remove one more piece of plastic from my wallet.

    23. Re:Why? What problem are they trying to solve? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      86% of Dumbericans are Puritanical dolts and bootlicking authoritarian scum.

      At least they aren't crazy ranting internet nut jobs.

    24. Re:Why? What problem are they trying to solve? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Substitute gun for alcohol in the above...

    25. Re:Why? What problem are they trying to solve? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      both?

    26. Re: Why? What problem are they trying to solve? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a cuck? You're saying you'll accept all of the negatives from this BS system over the "inconvenience" of carrying a lightweight piece of plastic? Sheesh you're dumb.

  13. Makes it easier for the police too! by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    Digital license, make it your lock screen wallpaper. Police need to see your ID, turn on your phone, and you won't have to unlock it. ;)

    1. Re:Makes it easier for the police too! by John.Banister · · Score: 2

      When I was curious about how to let someone else make a call on my phone without giving them access to my address book, the suggestion I found was that I make a separate user profile for guest use and have a password needed to switch back to my main one. Since multiple user profiles are possible, it wouldn't be that hard to make one called "ID" in addition to the guest one for letting a stranger make a call. Then the account with the ID doesn't share any of my other data, but I don't share my ID info with everyone who brings up my lock screen.

    2. Re: Makes it easier for the police too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What phone OS? As far as I knew all phone OSs are predominantly single user. It's baked into the design.

      I think a lot of the lock screen features are trying to work around that limitation.

      What I've seen is the ability to nominate numbers that can be called from the lock screen, but of course that doesn't help with giving your phone to someone to make an arbitrary call without giving them root access to do so.

  14. Any screenshots? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do the bartenders or police actually ask you to open the App in front of them or can you already have it on your screen?

    You could screenshot the app and then photoshop over the QR code with the QR code of someone else you know (over age 21) and select to only share Age for the bartender/club scenario.

  15. No Thank You by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Last thing I want is my only form of ID to be in my phone. What happens during a traffic stop usually? Cop takes your licence/id back to their car to write up your ticket and or look for other things like warrants. What are they going to do in this case, take your phone with them. No way I want a cop having unattended access to my phone.

    1. Re:No Thank You by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Worried they're gonna see all that Chicks With Dicks porn you watch?

    2. Re:No Thank You by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah bro, I like dudes with hung dicks. No interest in chicks with dicks. If i wanted to deal with a bitch I wouldn't be gay. MGTOW ATW

  16. One major problem solved... by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It prevents bars from using mandatory ID checks to build databases of customers... which most "bar code verifier" stations do when bouncers check ID. That level of access control is an objectively good thing.

    There are many other problems (for instance, this app probably uses that to record how many times you go to bars, and syncs your phone to real name in a way that is sold to FB) that are added. But, you know, one step forward, four steps back.

    --
    Your ad here. Ask me how!
  17. Only thing dumber is the CBP passport app by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    +50
    Only thing dumber is the CBP passport app for entering the USA.

    Like I'll have my phone powered on at any border control point. Certainly wouldn't have a fingerprint unlock anything.

    I'm not an idiot.

    1. Re: Only thing dumber is the CBP passport app by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Backup, encrypt, upload, wipe, cross, download, decrypt, restore. Works every time.

  18. Re:Why is she at the bar and he is driving? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you strain anything reaching for that?

  19. It's Part of a GOP Plot to Mandate Voter ID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thems 'publicans is EVIL!

  20. Re: Why is she at the bar and he is driving? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because she's a slut and he's in the friendzone.

  21. Oh shit WiFi is down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NO BEERS FOR U

  22. from surprisingly-progressive-for-Louisiana dept by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "from the surprisingly-progressive-for-Louisiana dept."

    Oh? How about "what will inevitably go horribly wrong for all who decide to use this"?

  23. And what happens ... by PPH · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... if a Louisiana resident happens to get pulled over travelling in some technologically backward state. Like California?

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:And what happens ... by Agripa · · Score: 1

      ... if a Louisiana resident happens to get pulled over travelling in some technologically backward state. Like California?

      There is no requirement for states to honor drivers licenses from other states so no problem.

  24. Coven? by cephalien · · Score: 1

    This is most certainly some sort of satanic cult plan to control the flow of ... most fun things.

    --
    If firefighters fight fire, and crimefighters fight crime, what do freedom fighters fight? - George Carlin
  25. Stupid complicated by DogDude · · Score: 2

    This is really absurdly complicated. This is like a Rube Goldberg version of an ID. Who would waste time with something this stupid? As others have said, this takes a non-problem, and makes a very complicated, expensive, time-consuming problem out of it.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
    1. Re:Stupid complicated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's because the intent is to have you hand over an unlocked phone that law enforcement can search for any "evidence"

  26. A digital driver's license? by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 2

    A digital driver's license on your phone? What could possibly go wrong?*

    Thank goodness phones are never hacked, infected, spoofed, or fall prey to malware.

    I predict we'll see another story about this within the next year or two about how some poor schmuck had his 'secure' digital driver's license hacked or deleted or altered or revoked, and got arrested and taken to jail or whatever because of it.

    ----
    * I feel like I'm saying "What could possibly go wrong" a lot these days, but damn if I'm not proved right nearly every time I do.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    1. Re:A digital driver's license? by w0ahbreh · · Score: 1

      I mean people lose their wallets and purses all the time with their physical license in it. If you actually go and read the website or look at the app in the play store, the app doesnt even load unless you enter your PIN or unlock it via face ID or password. It also has a remote wipe featuer incase your lose your phone. Also most phones have lock screens so this seems pretty secure VS a physical DL.

    2. Re:A digital driver's license? by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      Also most phones have lock screens so this seems pretty secure VS a physical DL.

      Like I said, thank goodness phones are never hacked, infected, spoofed, or fall prey to malware.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  27. Problem was puritanical states.. by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

    It used to be that some states had 18 and some had 21 as the drinking age. Shockingly, there was a lot of drunk driving one the borders between those states. So, they raised the 18 states to 21 to prevent all the DUIs.

    Why didn't they force the 21 states to lower it to 18? Because the federal government cannot really force states to make stuff legal, but can to make things illegal.

    --
    Your ad here. Ask me how!
    1. Re:Problem was puritanical states.. by jbengt · · Score: 1

      It used to be that some states had 18 and some had 21 as the drinking age. Shockingly, there was a lot of drunk driving one the borders between those states. So, they raised the 18 states to 21 to prevent all the DUIs.

      It was the opposite in my experience living in Chicago. Wisconsin had an 18 year drinking age before Illinois. When Illinois lowered the drinking age for beer and wine to 19 a few years later, one of the reasons cited was all of the drunk driving between Wisconsin and Illinois. But it didn't help to reduce drunk driving; Illinois ended up with more drunk drivers. So they raised it back again. This was all well before the 1984 National Minimum Drinking Age Act that someone else cited above.

  28. Not good by renegade600 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Once you willingly unlock your phone for the officer. he can legally search it if he feels it is necessary. No thank you, I will stick with the card.

  29. I can see an application for this by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    Hardly anyone is going to want to use a digital license for traffic stops or getting through the airport, but what about all those times you need information from your ID for other purposes? Instead of squinting at tiny numbers and transcribing them to paper, being able to use an app to beam data you specify to people who need it would be a huge improvement. Being able to incorporate all forms of ID, including passports and professional certs, would be better still.

    1. Re:I can see an application for this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is a government's wet dream, and so should be resisted will all our might.

  30. Re:GAY NIGGERS FROM OUTER SPACE GNAA GNAA GNAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is an excellent question, it has been on here for at least 15 years.

  31. Re:GAY NIGGERS FROM OUTER SPACE GNAA GNAA GNAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    was it before or after APK's first HOSTS file post?

  32. Civil liberties by Blue23 · · Score: 1

    Let me know when they've made the app part of the lock screen with a PIN or something so it's protected but I don't need to have unlocked my phone and offered it to someone in order to use it.

    --
    LITTLE GIRL: But which cookie will you eat FIRST? C. MONSTER: Me think you have misconception of cookie-eating process.
    1. Re:Civil liberties by w0ahbreh · · Score: 1

      Your phone already has this feature for any app. On iOS its called Guided Access and on Android its called Screen Pinning.

  33. relief for forgery makers by Micah+NC · · Score: 1

    Instead of making it harder to create forgeries, this will reduce the effort required to provide fake IDs for people.

    I am sure they will use the extra time to give back to their communities and spend quality time with their families.

  34. Suppressing people who can't afford smart phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would bet my retirement that this is just another step towards requiring a smart phone to vote 2020, which is sure to get rid of those pesky poor voters. F**k Louisiana!