Slashdot Mirror


What Happens After Surprising DNA Test Results? (bloombergquint.com)

schwit1 shared an interesting article from Bloomberg: Though genetic tests are frequently marketed as family-friendly entertainment, they sometimes wind up surfacing life-altering surprises. And when those surprises show up in someone's test results, the first move is often a call to customer service.... At 23andMe, those types of calls are so frequent that preparing for them is integrated into the company's months-long training program.... "We always try to steer the conversation toward the data, tell them that this is science," said Kent Hillyer, head of customer care for the genetic-testing firm 23andMe...

Lindsay Grove, a customer-care representative at 23andMe, still remembers one call in particular years later, a dad who took the test only to find out that his child was not, in fact, his child. At first, like most, he was just trying to figure out whether the results were accurate. So Grove explained the science behind the data. The customer then became somber and quiet. He questioned whether he should talk to his wife, and, if he did, how.... "That process of figuring out what to do next is very difficult for customers...."

Such emotional calls can take a toll on employees, too. That's perhaps inevitable when technology interfaces with such sensitive, personal information.... At 23andMe, Hillyer often encourages representatives to go for a walk after an intense call, or cracks open a bottle of wine to help them decompress. "We kind of do these internal therapy sessions,'' he said. "Here, maybe more so than most places, you have to be really supportive of each other."

111 of 238 comments (clear)

  1. Do they deal with law enforcement? by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    Do they deal with law enforcement?

    1. Re:Do they deal with law enforcement? by jfdavis668 · · Score: 2

      I doubt law enforcement ever calls and complains that someones results are wrong.

    2. Re:Do they deal with law enforcement? by PPH · · Score: 2

      What do you mean by 'deal with'? Do they inform law enforcement when an upset customer gets some results that he might react badly to? Or do they track down anonymous DNA samples from crime scenes to expose the identity of criminals?

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    3. Re:Do they deal with law enforcement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Do they deal with law enforcement?

      You bet they do. That's why it's dangerous to give them your DNA. In fact you may inadvertently be compromising the genetic privacy of your children, their children, your nieces and nephews and their children, etc. All of them can be tracked down from the data point that you unwittingly provided. This is how the government tracked down the Golden State Killer and now that this new capability has been demonstrated it's only a matter of time before it becomes cheaper, faster and more widely available until every small police department has access to it and every incentive to use your DNA against you and your loved ones. The government is cunning, deceitful and untrustworthy. You cannot trust them or their intentions. Please consider carefully the consequences beyond your own privacy before you buy one of these genetic testing kits. The value of the information that you get from these services is minimal and the consequences may end up being worse than you ever imagined. If you thought Facebook was bad then just imagine what the government might do with your genetic information. Just say no to genetic testing this holiday season. It's not worth it.

    4. Re: Do they deal with law enforcement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or you could, you know, raise your children to not murder people, so they don't need privacy from homicide detectives. Just sayin.

    5. Re: Do they deal with law enforcement? by novakyu · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I have nothing to hide, and I'm sure you have nothing to hide either. Who needs the Fourth Amendment?

    6. Re: Do they deal with law enforcement? by Shikaku · · Score: 2

      That isn't the point. If your genetics match the DNA left by a killer, you'll get a broken door and police search and seizure of evidence soon after. Even if they admit they got the wrong guy, your restitution could be minimal, and your life could still be in shambles, because they took everything valuable and your family ostracized you because they thought and still think you did it.

    7. Re:Do they deal with law enforcement? by ayesnymous · · Score: 1

      Did you not hear about the Golden State Killer earlier this year?

    8. Re: Do they deal with law enforcement? by BravoZuluM · · Score: 1

      How about when the government grabs your genetic results to plan and prioritize health care? They can say that certain DNA is a better bet than substandard DNA. It's always about, "Think of the children!" until it isn't.

    9. Re:Do they deal with law enforcement? by RottenJ · · Score: 1

      That is nothing, wait until insurance companies get a hold of your DNA info and use it to profile you based on the likelihood of you getting certain diseases. Then the fun will begin.

      --
      "It's fun to obey the machine" - Ralph Wiggum
    10. Re:Do they deal with law enforcement? by Donwulff · · Score: 3, Informative

      23andMe, which this article deals with, does not (voluntarily) co-operate with law-enforcement. Of course, if they get a court order, they will have to, but to do date they've never been asked for DNA data and haven't had to give out any personal data requested: https://www.23andme.com/transparency-report/
      23andMe also does not allow comparison of samples tested outside 23andMe against their own database, the same goes for AncestryDNA. The only reason the GSK case was solved was because those people had purposefully transferred their DNA data into GEDMatch, whose technology and terms of service specifically allowed for matching against this sort of data.
      It's alleged that many users of GEDMatch had not read or understood the Term of Service (likely) but others had uploaded their DNA data into GEDMatch specifically for these kinds of purposes. It remains a controversial topic in DNA testing circles not the least because it can implicate distant relatives, but to date merely testing at 23andMe or AncestryDNA hasn't caused anybody to become "police informant", they've had to take complicated actions where they're warned of this sort of possibility every step along the way (Or allowed somebody else to do it for them) to participate in law enforcement DNA searches.
      On the other hand, in most of the world USA included law enforcement can legally collect DNA samples from pretty much everybody and construct their own, private DNA database. The law enforcement DNA databases even currently dwarf 23andMe's database in size. The only reason consumer DNA tests were useful in GSK case were because the culprit was beyond suspicion due to being an ex cop and had never had his DNA taken by law enforcement.

      But anyway, the short answer is that no, 23andMe does not "deal" with law enforcement unless forced to, which they've never yet been.

    11. Re:Do they deal with law enforcement? by surd1618 · · Score: 1

      Take the test anonymously?

    12. Re: Do they deal with law enforcement? by alexo · · Score: 1

      Or you could, you know, raise your children to not murder people, so they don't need privacy from homicide detectives. Just sayin.

      Homicide detective's #1 priority is to close cases. It does not matter if they get the actual murderer as long as they can build a strong case against a person -- any person. So if your DNA is found on the scene of the crime (and you leave traces of you DNA whenever you go) and you don't happen to have an ironclad alibi, well then my friend, it sucks to be you.

  2. What happens? by nospam007 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Some white supremacists discover they are not quite _that_ white.

    1. Re:What happens? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Elizabeth Warren finds out she's not _that_ Indian.

    2. Re:What happens? by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Ask them, both 23andme and Ancestry have admitted to skewing results such that people almost always get results indicating mixed ancestry.

    3. Re: What happens? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well, depends on what you call mixed. Mine from Ancestry was mainly Gaelic ( Irish, Scots ) with a small about of Eastern European that might be Russian from the family tree.

      DNA matches were spot on - I found two first cousins on my dad's side, and several 2nd cousins (first cousins of both parents ) . Considering it was a denial at first of my existence from my dad's side, science won out.

    4. Re:What happens? by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I got the opposite results of what many white supremacists nutcases are getting, according to 23andMe I'm 100.0% white European (my family were peasant stock from central European going back forever). I actually wanted to have some interesting mixed blood, but it's just completely boring central European monoculture. Maybe I should sell my DNA to the mixed-race white supremacists...

    5. Re:What happens? by negRo_slim · · Score: 1

      I got the opposite results of what many white supremacists nutcases are getting, according to 23andMe I'm 100.0% white European (my family were peasant stock from central European going back forever). I actually wanted to have some interesting mixed blood, but it's just completely boring central European monoculture. Maybe I should sell my DNA to the mixed-race white supremacists...

      Wow dude. I hope you are trying to crack wise or something. Otherwise... Yikes.

      --
      On the Oregon Cost born and raised, On the beach is where I spent most of my days
    6. Re:What happens? by Corbets · · Score: 1

      Oh, come on. He was clearly not serious about selling his dna to white supremacists. If you think otherwise... Yikes.

    7. Re: What happens? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Don't be such a dumbass- it's right there in the summary. 'Guy X was surprised to find out he's not the bio dad.' All it takes is one link in the chain of her ancestors.

      But I'm very glad to know that you know the truth of her family history better than she does. Perhaps you should call her office and make an appointment. I'm sure she'd be grateful.

    8. Re:What happens? by GerryHattrick · · Score: 1

      No kidding. We discovered 1/64 Ashkenasi DNA, we are proud of that, have traced their immigration and then 3 generations of integration. Britain was an acceptably diverse place, until the recent culturally-incompatible invasions

    9. Re: What happens? by nospam007 · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Donald Trump is very likely more "Indian" than she is."

      No, his granddad was a whorehouse owner in Klondike, not an Indian.

    10. Re:What happens? by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      "Elizabeth Warren was at most 3% Native American which corresponds to a great-great-great grandparent. This doesn't match her story."

      So her granny missed a 'great' when telling her the story?
      The bitch!

    11. Re:What happens? by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      "Donald Trump should take the test and find out if he has a higher percentage. If he does, he should then claim to have discovered himself to be genderfluid (the left says you can't question it!), and is now the first minority woman to become president."

      He has bigger tits than Elisabeth Warren anyway.

    12. Re:What happens? by haruchai · · Score: 1

      "He has bigger tits than Elisabeth Warren anyway."

      And a much wider ass

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    13. Re:What happens? by haruchai · · Score: 1

      "it's just completely boring central European monoculture. Maybe I should sell my DNA to the mixed-race white supremacists"
      Better idea would be to challenge for leadership of Stormfront or some such based on ancestral purity.
      Or go after Steve King's Congressional seat

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    14. Re:What happens? by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Elizabeth Warren was at most 3% Native American which corresponds to a great-great-great grandparent.
      From what I read, that was the "at most" value, and that the probable range was 1/64th to 1/1024th, with 1/512th being most likely.

    15. Re:What happens? by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      I'm defined by who I am, not whether my great-great-great grandfather was a different race to my great-great-great grandmother.

      For any white supremacists wanting to cover up the fact that their great-grandmother's name was actually Leshaniqua and not Mary as claimed, please remit $1,000 to pure_aryan_dnatest_results@paypal.com.

      I'm actually surprised no-one's done this yet. You can buy clean urine test results to cover up doping, I'm sure there'd be a good market for "pure" DNA test results to cover up ancestry. If you can get people to pay money for pee, I'm sure they'd pay money for spit.

  3. The ones I like by rsilvergun · · Score: 2, Insightful

    are all the white supremacists finding out they're made up of 30-40% some kind of dark skinned folks they've decided to hate. It's been a bit of a problem in their community since a sizable chunk of their leadership's been forced out by it. Gotta love the way science chips away at all the old crap our species has put up with.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:The ones I like by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's been a bit of a problem in their community since a sizable chunk of their leadership's been forced out by it.

      Who has been forced out? Do you have a citation?

      According to PBS, alt-right groups do not cast out people with "non-white" DNA. They instead question the validity of the results, and there are conspiracy theories that the DNA labs are telling many people that their DNA is "mixed" to push their liberal agenda that "we are all the same".

      Also, they may not be as bigoted as you think. The founder of the Aryan Brotherhood is a Jew.

      Disclaimer: I am white, but my wife and kids are not.

    2. Re:The ones I like by Kjella · · Score: 2

      are all the white supremacists finding out they're made up of 30-40% some kind of dark skinned folks they've decided to hate.

      We're 99% chimp, more like 0.3-0.4% the "dark skinned folks".

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    3. Re:The ones I like by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Given the questionable accuracy and the ability of technicians to "tune" the test results, it could just be 23andMe trolling those people. Which may be a moral requirement to do to them.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    4. Re:The ones I like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The founder of the Aryan Brotherhood [wikipedia.org] is a Jew.

      His last name comes from a step-father his mother named when he was a kid, and he seems to make a pretty big deal about insisting who his biological father is. Considering he tells stories of getting beaten up in school by kids who thought he was Jewish when he was not, it shouldn't be surprising how that influenced his development and why not being Jewish is an important part of his identity...

    5. Re:The ones I like by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      It should be. Those idiots deserve it not only for being dumbfuck racists, but for treating the Fisher-Price Babby's First Ethnicity Test results with such confidence. Either factor alone would be enough to warrant a sound trolling.

      Interestingly the white supremacist...community (centipede hive?) has responded to the fact that they're not "Aryan" Ubermensch by shifting to a "well as long as you're white-ish and support white nationalism" standard for membership.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  4. That was due to 23andme faking results by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    In case you have forgotten, last year there was a big scandal about 23andme employees adding african ancestry to test results to "screw with the racists": http://www.cracked.com/persona...

    1. Re:That was due to 23andme faking results by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Which leads to question that I never saw asked in the reporting of this story: How did the 23&me staff know about the racist attitudes of their customers?

    2. Re:That was due to 23andme faking results by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      cracked.com is a source?

      LOL. Maybe you should dredge up a stormfront or breitbart link too.

    3. Re:That was due to 23andme faking results by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Where have you been for the last decade? If you're white, you're automatically racist. Check your privilege.

    4. Re:That was due to 23andme faking results by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 5, Funny

      I tried to use my white privilege at Costco but they wouldn't give me any discount.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    5. Re:That was due to 23andme faking results by WhiplashII · · Score: 1

      That is of course the most hilarious thing about racism. All Americans are all African-Americans if you go back far enough!

      --
      while (sig==sig) sig=!sig;
    6. Re:That was due to 23andme faking results by WhiplashII · · Score: 1

      In fact, I think we should start reporting DNA test results as "time that your ancestors moved out of Africa". Just to mess with the racists of all persuasions!

      --
      while (sig==sig) sig=!sig;
    7. Re:That was due to 23andme faking results by The+Evil+Atheist · · Score: 1

      You had a discount, but you used it on the "don't have security follow me around" add-on service.

      --
      Those who do not learn from commit history are doomed to regress it.
    8. Re:That was due to 23andme faking results by The+Evil+Atheist · · Score: 1

      And which culture is that, and where's your evidence?

      --
      Those who do not learn from commit history are doomed to regress it.
  5. Ops, you're a bastard or you child isn't! by MonsterMasher · · Score: 1, Insightful

    1/3 of us are Bastards.

    This sample shows 30%, near 1/3 of children&men are victimized by Parental Fraud.
    https://medium.com/@jimpreston...

    Motherhood is sampling of all women's morals. 1/3 women will actively live life-destroying (to 'loved' husbands/lovers & their children) lies,the rest lie to cover for them.

    Enjoy considering the #BelieveWomen !

    1. Re:Ops, you're a bastard or you child isn't! by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

      Had no idea the number was that high.

    2. Re:Ops, you're a bastard or you child isn't! by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      You do have to keep in mind that 104% of statistics are made up.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    3. Re:Ops, you're a bastard or you child isn't! by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

      Only the optimistic ones.
      Source: life.

    4. Re:Ops, you're a bastard or you child isn't! by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 5, Informative

      30% of paternity tests, not 30% of paternity tests done for a random selection of children ...

    5. Re:Ops, you're a bastard or you child isn't! by Kjella · · Score: 4, Informative

      30% of paternity tests, not 30% of paternity tests done for a random selection of children ...

      Yes. They have done studies on "incidentally" taken genetic tests like looking for compatible donors and in the population as a whole it's probably somewhere between 0.5-3%. This is largely consistent with anonymous surveys indicating about 2% of women got pregnant at a time they had multiple sexual partners, some of which would have the "right" dad. It's not one in a million odds but that 30% figure is a myth that never dies.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    6. Re:Ops, you're a bastard or you child isn't! by arth1 · · Score: 1

      A fair amount of infidelity is to be expected. Where reproduction is concerned, we're merely acting in the best interest of our genes. Because it's very limited how many children a woman can raise, their genetic goal is to (a) obtain help raising children to the best possible level, and to (b) pair the genes with the best possible male genes. This encourages women to infidelity with more successful males than their partners, as long as it isn't found out.

      That this is fairly common shouldn't surprise anyone. Being cuckolded is a part of human life. Deal.

    7. Re:Ops, you're a bastard or you child isn't! by n3r0.m4dski11z · · Score: 1

      I'm sure then that you've never had the feeling that someone was "like a son" to you. Biology isn't all there is to being a parent.

      --
      -
    8. Re:Ops, you're a bastard or you child isn't! by The+Evil+Atheist · · Score: 1

      What sample? You linked to a blog post, with no link to the actual sample. Just "a recent study": those words, not a link.

      And then he concludes that it somehow is the biggest reason birth rates are falling across the Western world?

      You're as gullible as shit.

      --
      Those who do not learn from commit history are doomed to regress it.
    9. Re:Ops, you're a bastard or you child isn't! by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Then I guess that once the infidelity is revealed, said cuckolded male should not not have to pay alimony after kicking the said bitch out.

      But the courts think otherwise unfortunetely. Ah yes the the great patriarcal system.

      A countermeasure from our genes' point of view is keeping the women confined so they won't see other males, especially not high status males. That's basis for the patriarchal system.
      And when that fails, infanticide.

    10. Re:Ops, you're a bastard or you child isn't! by arth1 · · Score: 1

      I'm sure then that you've never had the feeling that someone was "like a son" to you. Biology isn't all there is to being a parent.

      That is biology. The drive to be a father figure to children that may not be yours is a response to the female tricks of hidden ovulation and infidelity. When the males can't know for sure whether the children are theirs (or children of male relatives that share a large percentage of one's genes), the best survival tactic from the genes' point of view is to err on the side of caution and raise as many nearby children as one has resources for.
      Even if you know the children aren't yours, your genes don't, so the drive will be there.

  6. Surprising? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If a dad took the test only to find out whether his child was his or not, then it means that he was suspicious to begin with, so why is the DNA test result surprising?

    1. Re:Surprising? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      I guess it's easier to be shocked by test results than to acknowledge your own suspicions.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    2. Re:Surprising? by arth1 · · Score: 1

      If a dad took the test only to find out whether his child was his or not

      Where do you get this if from? How do you know he didn't take the test for other reasons, and found out something he wasn't expecting?

      At any rate, I won't take any genome test until there is a test facility that (a) will anonymize submissions and (b) will destroy all genetic materials and results after providing the results. Paying extra for the two is fine.

  7. Re: Isn't this the same company by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

    And where did you here that?

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  8. They do make errors by Solandri · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My sister had my dad tested since although we're stereotypically Asian, our family's eyes are slightly rounder. She thought we might have a European ancestor somewhere in our genealogy. The test results came back 50% Hungarian, 40% Scandinavian. The biggest Asian component was 0.6% Japanese. Our best guess is the sample was contaminated, or they accidentally swapped with someone else's sample. But the company insisted they were accurate and that they never made mistakes.

    I feel really sorry for people whose lives might be turned upside down by an erroneous test result, because they believe a company which is trying to preserve the marketability of their product by insisting they can't make mistakes. Given that 23andMe claims 5 million users, even a 99.99% accuracy rate means 500 customers were given erroneous results.

    1. Re:They do make errors by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      But the company insisted they were accurate and that they never made mistakes.

      Bullcrap. All of these companies have huge disclaimers about the accuracy of their results all over their websites and on the results you receive. None of them say they "never make mistakes."

    2. Re:They do make errors by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      I think people put too much faith in these low-budget companies like 23 & Me. Whether it's contaminated samples, or claiming to analyze all sorts of DNA while actually only looking at mitochondrial results... their results shouldn't be considered definitive.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    3. Re: They do make errors by misnohmer · · Score: 1

      All tests have a margin of error, and none have 100% accuracy. That's just the nature of testing. That is why, if someone gets a surprising result, the best course of action is to perform another, independent test, to further minimize the error. So, if a dna test tells you a child is not yours, before you take drastic action, order a paternity test from an independent company.

      That said, DNA testing companies will of course have to deal with this problem because there will always be a percentage of children whose fathers have been mislead. I saw a long term study a while back tracking paternity over 40 years at a hospital on the east coast of US. Surprisingly, the percentage of children born with the fathers not knowing they were not theirs was almost constant for 40 years - it was around 10%. So, it seems that this is a problem which is not new at all, and it's probably not going to go away since it seems it's just human nature. I'm sure the percentage varies between communities, but it is likely that it also not changing, unless something drastic happens like mandatory paternity tests at hospitals, but that is very unlikely as governments such as the US government prefer to not do that as it would create a large number of fatherless children, therefore nobody to go after for child support. This is why the law in the US only gives fathers 6 months to contest paternity, after that, even 100 independent DNA test results make no difference as far as child support goes.

    4. Re: They do make errors by quenda · · Score: 1

      That "10% rate" is a widely circulated urban legend, or zombie statistic.
      Real studies in western countries show around 1-2% .

      Though 10% has been seen in studies from Mexico, and blacks in Detroit.

      https://isogg.org/wiki/Non-pat...
      http://insidestory.org.au/the-...

    5. Re:They do make errors by The+Evil+Atheist · · Score: 1

      What do you mean bullcrap? You're talking about disclaimers. He's talking about what the company said, presumably after contacting them about obviously wrong results. ie, some customer service person.

      Just because they put disclaimers doesn't mean that person-to-person customer service can't then make questionable claims.

      You must be really gullible if you think companies only say what's on their disclaimers.

      --
      Those who do not learn from commit history are doomed to regress it.
  9. Re:SO what? by sarren1901 · · Score: 1

    What if your kid comes to you as a teenager and just really wants to know the their ancestry. Dad says sure. Results come back and gee, looks like mom cheated and got pregnant. If dad doesn't already know about this, that's a HUGE big deal. I mean, if the wife lied about that, who knows WHAT she is capable of.

    Has nothing to do with the daughter really and dad doesn't love daughter any less. Obviously the child is innocent. BBC literally just did a long write up on this topic. Was a decent read but don't be surprised if skeletons come out of the closet. People like to mess around.

  10. Wine? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 4, Funny

    At 23andMe, Hillyer often encourages representatives to go for a walk after an intense call, or cracks open a bottle of wine to help them decompress.

    If experience has taught me anything it's that to decompress something you usually need pkunzip.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
    1. Re:Wine? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      We're old, not obsolete.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
  11. Même chose pour moi by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2

    Mon test d'ADN confirme que je suis 97% Français et 3% Amérindien. Et pourtant, je ne parle pas un seul mot de la langue française.

    Quelles foutaises, ces tests d'ADN!

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
    1. Re:Même chose pour moi by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      Well, that is the proof that nurture trumps nature.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
  12. Re: Isn't this the same company by Cederic · · Score: 2

    Fraud. Exactly the grounds on which he should also be suing her for damages to cover for any legally mandated monetary award against him to pay for the child, plus whatever damages he feels are appropriate.

  13. Re: Science? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    Probably the same kind of weird events that happened with Clayton Bigsby.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  14. Not really. 99% European. 8 generations, a Mexican by raymorris · · Score: 3, Informative

    She claimed to be native American, and specifically Cherokee.

    The test results show that over 99% of her DNA is European. In other words, she's about as white as they come. Very close to the average UK citizen.

    The results further indicate that most likely, she had a single great-great-great-great-great-great-grandparent from South America, Central America, or North America.
    So 6-10 generations back, one Mexican or whatever. That hardly supports her long-held claim "I'm Cherokee". Notably, after the results, the tribe made it a point to come out and say that as far as they are concerned, she's definitely not Cherokee.

  15. Re: SO what? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    Apparently, more relevantly, she is NOT capable of using a condom.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  16. Re:SO what? by vakuona · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Maybe people don't like being lied to. It's not necessarily about the child. Having a child is a big step, and a responsibility that most men take seriously. Is it too much to ask that one doesn't lie to a man about the paternity of their child?

  17. Retest, it'll pay for itself. by doug141 · · Score: 2

    If you really think an error, submit another sample, under a false name if you have to. I saw a journalist submit 2 doggy DAN samples to the same company, along with the (required) photo of the animal. The results for second sample he submitted (with the false photo) came back totally different, and matching the photo, not the original DNA "results." $180 bucks for the two samples gave him a notable news story.

  18. Even your own link doesn't claim that by raymorris · · Score: 2

    The article you linked to says that in two instances, when those people stated they wanted to make sure they didn't have any "n*gger* blood", 23andme truthfully told them that their level of African ancestory was âless than 1%".

    They said they did it to those two racists, and their statement was true.

    1. Re:Even your own link doesn't claim that by WhiplashII · · Score: 1

      Makes you wonder if the same is not true of "less than 1% native american" reported to Senator Warren.

      --
      while (sig==sig) sig=!sig;
    2. Re:Even your own link doesn't claim that by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      23andme truthfully told them that their level of African ancestory was "less than 1%"

      ... when in fact their ancestry was 100% African. Everyone's ancestry is 100% African. The human species originated in Africa (along with the ancestors of Homo sapiens Neanderthalensis and Homo sapiens Denisovensis, to dispose of those few percent of possible argument). If those white supremacists don't like that, then they're probably going to be upset by the news that they are fish - as seen from the perspective of a shark.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  19. Re:Some people don't need a DNA test by DigressivePoser · · Score: 1

    So your theory proves it. Chelsea Clinton's father really is Webster Hubbell.

  20. Re:#Prison for Drumpftards by mukinrestak · · Score: 1

    I think it's a pretty big assumption to assume we actually like our side's politicians. We just hate/fear theirs even more. (feel free to assume/assign whichever side you prefer to there, it works either way)

    Think of it like one of those torture porn Saw type movies. You're being forced to make a choice between having your genitals ripped off with a rusty wire wheel, or your teeth ground out on a stone mill wheel. Or you can vote third party and drill your kneecaps, then get one of the first two options chosen for you anyway.

  21. Re:Science? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    Do you have a link for this? Google turns up nothing about 23andMe distorting their results in this manner.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  22. Re:Science? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

    Ah, never mind. I found it. It's an alt-right conspiracy theory, to explain why some people who thought they were Arian turned out not to be.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  23. Re:Some people don't need a DNA test by Sique · · Score: 2
    Yes, like my classmate: Redhaired, blue eyed, spreckled face. And born in Santiago de Cuba.

    You fail.

    --
    .sig: Sique *sigh*
  24. References were Mexico, Peru and Colombia by raymorris · · Score: 1

    The reference DNA they used for American native is people from Mexico, Peru and Colombia. That's native to the Americas (Western hemisphere), not Native American.

    The test shows that most likely, one of her 256 great^8 grandparents were from the Western Hemisphere.

  25. Re:Not really. 99% European. 8 generations, a Mexi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    She then said she was Cherokee when applying to things. Do you not see how that is a problem?

  26. Re:SO what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    In France paternity tests are illegal, so apparently not.

  27. Re:SO what? by Kjella · · Score: 1

    Maybe people don't like being lied to. It's not necessarily about the child. Having a child is a big step, and a responsibility that most men take seriously.

    And in some cases, very begrudgingly. Like if you felt this was a colossal fuck-up, but it's your kid so suck it up and be a dad, completely rewrite your plan for life... only to learn you're not actually the dad. Yeah, I can see how that would send someone in a 11/10 rage. I mean it's different if you were totally okay with starting a family and it's the child you wanted but turned out not to be yours. I'd really like to know if there are some statistics on that, like in what percentage of pregnancies was the man expecting a child. Of course sometimes the woman is surprised too and if she doesn't want an abortion it can happen out of the blue, but usually it's just the man "stuck" with an unexpected child. Just because it's something of a surprise pregnancy is not reason to assume your girlfriend is cheating on you.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  28. Determining your own blood type by nerdonamotorcycle · · Score: 1

    Determining your own blood type used to be a standard lab exercise in high school biology classes, 30+ years ago. The biggest reason it isn't any longer is, of course, fear of blood borne infections. A secondary consideration was that a lot of students found out via this exercise that it was impossible for them to have been their parents' biological child. This sometimes caused family drama when the child found out this information and brought it home to his or her parents. The kid was adopted and had never been told, their mother had had an affair, the mother had been pregnant when she got married or gave birth before marriage but the groom wasn't the father, there had been divorce and remarriage before the kid was old enough to remember, etc., etc. All sorts of situations. Years ago I remember casually reading somewhere that the biological father of 1/5 of USAn children was someone other than the person the child called "Dad".

  29. Re:Not really. 99% European. 8 generations, a Mexi by atheos · · Score: 1

    Source, and prisonplanet doesn't count.

  30. Re: Science? by jd · · Score: 1

    So far, not a single person has offered a credible link to that claim, and you've offered no link at all.

    Urban legands and conspiracy theories don't qualify as proof.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  31. Been tested by three independent companies by jd · · Score: 1

    If they're faking, damn they're good. Identical results on all markers checked by more than one group.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  32. Re:When did I say "alt-right"? by quenda · · Score: 1

    I said, "white supremacist". OTOH it says something about the alt-right that when you mention white supremacists folks think of the two together...

    What does it says? Except that oft-repeat slurs stick.

  33. Genetics are weird - that may be true about you by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 1

    My sister had my dad tested since although we're stereotypically Asian, our family's eyes are slightly rounder. She thought we might have a European ancestor somewhere in our genealogy. The test results came back 50% Hungarian, 40% Scandinavian. The biggest Asian component was 0.6% Japanese. Our best guess is the sample was contaminated, or they accidentally swapped with someone else's sample. But the company insisted they were accurate and that they never made mistakes.

    You ever heard of Chang and Eng Bunker? They died in 1874. They are where the term "Siamese twins" comes from. Look them up on Wikipedia if you don't know about them. They lived in North Carolina and married a couple of white ladies. Some of their descendants still look Asian almost 150 years later. Most don't. But some do look very Asian. And that's despite years of breeding with white people. I suppose it could really be true what the genetic test said based on that.

  34. 23and42 by billybob2001 · · Score: 1

    Nice ad for 23andme - not sure what else it is.

    The only DNA I want to be reading about is Douglas Adams.

    Which would give us 42andme - much better.

  35. When your sister... isn't. by CODiNE · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I know someone who found out their "sister" was actually their mother. It took some time to work out what was going on, but it turned out her biological father raped his daughter long ago, got her pregnant and made her agree to hide it. The victim admitted to this when confronted by her sister/daughter with the genetic test results.

    The family is quite freaked out. The old guy is dead but everyone is kind of wrecked right now. There's worse things than finding out your spouse cheated on you. Much worse things.

    --
    Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
    1. Re:When your sister... isn't. by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      Instead of moping about it, they could just decide to move on with their lives. Nothing material had changed and nothing needs to change.

      Even if it turns out my mother is actually my granddaughter, I would still treat her the exact same way (aside from questioning her about the time machine perhaps).

  36. Re:Not really. 99% European. 8 generations, a Mexi by djinn6 · · Score: 1

    Maybe those places should've hired on merit. They can't lie about their race if you don't ask!

  37. Re:Not really. 99% European. 8 generations, a Mexi by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 2, Insightful

    She claimed to be native American, and specifically Cherokee.

    Incorrect. Elizabeth Warren said that according to family lore, she has a Cherokee ancestor.

    The test results show that over 99% of her DNA is European. In other words, she's about as white as they come.

    Actually, no it proved that the family lore was legit and she is part Cherokee. Not a lot but some which was the claim all along.

    Notably, after the results, the tribe made it a point to come out and say that as far as they are concerned, she's definitely not Cherokee.

    She didn't claim to be part of the tribe. Also, they only seemed to be upset after the results were in, not when Individual-1 was making a big deal about it.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
  38. Re:Some people don't need a DNA test by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    It'a obvious from the face Chelsea is Bill's daughter. The real question is does Hillary know Chelsea is not her daughter?

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  39. Re:Science? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    Right, and no-one thought to screenshot or archive the page, no news articles were written about it, all evidence was effectively and completely scrubbed from the internet.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  40. Reliable by GerryHattrick · · Score: 1

    I've tested with all the major systems (genetic Nerd here) and the results are absolutely compatible ('export' to GEDmatch to compare detail). 23&Me seems to be choosing the 'health' speciality, Ancestry guards its proprietary earnings, FTDNA seems fully professional (and willingly re-tested/confirmed, when I had a query). My surname back to 1700s never matches, and we must accept that 10% of births are 'non-paternity events'. In the old days, that included informal adoption by maternal uncles when genetic parents had both died of the ususal smallpox or TB. Are we so generous now?

  41. Re:Science? by Megol · · Score: 1

    Citation needed.

  42. Re: Science? by Megol · · Score: 1

    So where are the statements? If you know where they are why not post a link to them, or are we to go to stormfront.org to see an "archived" statement?

  43. Re:Not really. 99% European. 8 generations, a Mexi by haruchai · · Score: 1

    Very close to the average UK citizen.

    Isn't the average UK citizen nowadays 7% Asian or something like that?

    Isn't more like 30% Pakistani? That's what I've heard from some *white* friends

    --
    Pain is merely failure leaving the body
  44. Re:SO what? by Megol · · Score: 1

    In many places a cheating woman is killed or at least a pariah while a cheating man is celebrated. In many other places a man can have as many wives as he want, including temporary wives for some sex, while a woman walking outside by herself (even if not exposing any skin which of course is a great crime) can be killed.
    Yes women have it easy and the poor men takes all the blame. :(

  45. Re:#Prison for Drumpftards by haruchai · · Score: 1

    But then she wouldn't be an idiot, and we would be living in a different reality.

    It's all Warren's fault we're living in a reality where Trump has shown us for decades exactly the kind of person he is and still became President

    --
    Pain is merely failure leaving the body
  46. Re: Science? by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

    Then how in the fuck do you know about it?

    I have a thing that I believe most people call "memory" and I read a lot of shit on biotech.

  47. Re:Science? by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

    Why would anyone expect a company to make a statement, news articles to be written about that statement, then all of the articles and statements to be pulled?

  48. Re: Science? by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

    The fact you would assume my sources come from a website like that shows a lot more about your credibility than mine.

  49. anonymous by surd1618 · · Score: 1

    How about a totally anonymous test?