Slashdot Mirror


Tech is Killing Street Food (theatlantic.com)

In San Francisco and Bangalore, street-vendor unions and nonprofits are helping informal food workers eke out a living -- but their future is still uncertain. From a report: Bangalore and the Bay Area have a lot in common. They are the tech centers of the world's second- and third-most-populous countries, respectively, and they both sometimes feel like they're bursting at the seams. Some economists argue that when tech companies move to cities with rigid housing markets, the value of real wages goes down as the cost of living jumps. [...] In both places, many street vendors are migrants -- Bangalore's come from other parts of India, while in the Bay Area many hail from Latin America. They and their livelihoods offer a warning about the fate of immigrant service labor in the tech economy: When space is at a premium, the high-profile, high-margin industries tend to take it up, while the low-paid, already precarious jobs that keep them humming are threatened.

Bangalore is full of food vendors like Sukumar N. T. According to Aditi Surie, a sociologist at the Indian Institute for Human Settlements who specializes in the gig economy, Bangalore has limited licensed areas for people to ply food, so "across income groups" in the city, "informal food vending is valuable to all." But near the International Tech Park Bangalore in Whitefield, you won't see street vendors. Plenty are stationed immediately outside the ITPB's gates, however, which has led to some tension. Earlier this year, The Times of India called the street vendors near the office park "a huge menace" because they impede ITPB employees' passage in and out of the complex. Whitefield "is really illogically planned," Vinay Sreenivasa told me from his dusty office. Sreenivasa is a member of both the Alternative Law Forum, a legal-advocacy organization, and Bengaluru Jilla Beedhi Vyaapari Sanghatanegala Okkuta, a street-vendor union. "They planned only for tech parks and hotels," he explained. "In a way, those [informal] livelihoods are created by the poor planning." That generally doesn't bother rank-and-file IT workers -- they need to eat, too -- but according to Sreenivasa, some managers and officials think that the informal businesses undermine the area's air of modern enterprise.

Back in California, some of the Bay Area's massive tech campuses have become mini cities, complete with their own closed food systems. This is an understandable move for companies in remote suburban enclaves, perhaps, but less so for urban headquarters, where abundant free or subsidized food can allow tech employees to avoid engaging with local restaurants or vendors. Some tech offices do hire small catering businesses. And companies such as Zendesk choose not to offer free food, to encourage their employees to frequent local businesses. But many technology headquarters isolate themselves from the local food culture, and the people whose livelihoods depend on it.

77 of 141 comments (clear)

  1. Forest fires and bird habitat by goombah99 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    After a forest burns they count birds. What they find typcially is like 80% of more loss of both birds and bird species. Sad. But not as sad as it sounds. The birds did not die. They moved. And while there was a huge ecosystem impact it wasn't like the birds were all killed off.

    The street food vendors are not gone. THey just move to the next sweet spot in the food chain where there's an urban lower middle class that is being lifted up and is glad to have street vendors moving into their neighbor hoods finally.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:Forest fires and bird habitat by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      According to the summary, the places discussed are still "full of food vendors."

      And here in the US, food cards are still a growth niche.

      Stupidest ad ever. "Hi, we didn't have a story, so we just talked about food and lied in the headline."

    2. Re:Forest fires and bird habitat by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      "food carts"

      Also, whoever is running this mess, it made me wait to post this correction even though I've only commented once today.

      If you don't let us comment, you'll stop getting the page views, too. And you'll actually go to zero comments from the affected users on most stories, because if we forced to leave after a couple minutes using the site, it might be days before we make it back.

    3. Re:Forest fires and bird habitat by Red_Forman · · Score: 1

      Street food vendors can't fly, dumbass.

    4. Re:Forest fires and bird habitat by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      You don't speak for me.

      I'm a retired IT guy so I grok that shit happens from time-to-time.

      I'm not losing $100,000 an hour or any sleep.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    5. Re:Forest fires and bird habitat by dryeo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The birds did not die. They moved.

      Isn't that an oversimplification? It could be nesting season, those eggs/fledglings didn't move. Some fires move faster then a bird flies.
      Most importantly, many birds are territorial, there's some common ones around here that won't cross the road or a stream and others that hang around their territory all the time, no seasonal movements and very aggressive to their neigbours. The big thing with some of these species, is when they do move, the new territories are already occupied, causing lots of conflicts which the established bird usually wins as it isn't exhausted from escaping a forest fire and knows the territory. These territories can usually only support a certain population of birds as well.
      The street food vendors are going to run into similar problems, families that make uprooting and moving hard. A percentage who are just not very predisposed to move and most importantly, moving into already occupied territory, which can often only support so many food vendors.
      I think your conclusion that birds and street vendors happily move to a new area and do well without an affect on the current inhabitants is largely wishful thinking.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    6. Re:Forest fires and bird habitat by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      And it's not even a story. 30 years ago most larger tech campuses had cafeterias, it's not a new phenomena. Smaller places often only had 1 place nearby that served sandwiches, and possibly a traveling roach coach. Street food was a non-existent item when tech was newer since that existed only in the city hubs and tech was not in the city hubs.

    7. Re:Forest fires and bird habitat by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Indeed. Street food is more common and better than ever before. TFA is just stupid. Office parks often have food trucks and carts around lunchtime. And office parks are not a "new" thing either, nor are they specific to tech.

      Journalists just hate nerds because we make more money, drive Teslas, and get all the chicks. So they blame every problem on us.

    8. Re:Forest fires and bird habitat by novakyu · · Score: 1

      It could be nesting season, those eggs/fledglings didn't move.

      Good thing most human cultures stopped practicing—thanks to the industrial revolution and the green revolution—exposing of newborns and starving fledglings to death when they have to move.

      I don't think the OP suggested that there were no impacts on the street food vendors; they (and their young 'uns) didn't die—or be forced out of business en masse.

    9. Re:Forest fires and bird habitat by dryeo · · Score: 1

      You missed my point that many people, like birds, have families/children which makes moving not a simple get up and move thing.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    10. Re:Forest fires and bird habitat by novakyu · · Score: 1

      No, I didn't miss it, because I do remember how it was like dying when my family had to move when I was young.

    11. Re:Forest fires and bird habitat by dryeo · · Score: 1

      So do I. Hated it when I lost my friends, my neighborhood where I knew where everything was and how traumatizing it was walking into a different school not knowing anyone and being the object of bullying. I did my best to keep my son in the same school system from kindergarten to grade 12. My wife has similar memories of moving.
      Perhaps you were the kind of person who found it exciting and easily adapted, we're all different.
      Anyways, the biggest point was the territories part.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    12. Re:Forest fires and bird habitat by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      In the US, street food has evolved from pushcarts to today's food trucks. Which operate just as easily in high-tech parts of town as the pushcarts once did in the areas where people worked.

    13. Re:Forest fires and bird habitat by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      The street food vendors are not gone. THey just move to the next sweet spot in the food chain

      California has what, 56 counties? Something like that. And in order to do business as a food truck, you have to get re-licensed in each county in which you'd like to do business. If San Francisco makes it too hard to be a food truck vendor, then the owner is going to have to go through all of that rigamarole all over again. There's time, there's money, in many counties the systems are designed to fail food trucks to protect B&M restaurants, and overall it's expensive and time-consuming.

      Of course, if you can be outcompeted by a food truck, it's not just because you have more overhead. People will pay more for a more complete experience. It's because your restaurant sucks. However, crotchety old pricks who can't taste anything any more vote more than young hipsters who love tacos. They vote for protectionist laws designed to keep things the way they are. Then they rant about how much they love the free market.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    14. Re:Forest fires and bird habitat by postbigbang · · Score: 2

      The tech empire is full of not-invented-here-so-it-sucks. For the money paid, most tech orgs want to keep focus and productivity on the task at hand, and so distractions must be evil.. especially when the dukes and earls of VC funding are breathing down the necks of startups.

      San Francisco/Bay Area and Bangalore are exceptions, not the rule. Tech loves to flatter itself and think that all of its problems are brand new.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    15. Re:Forest fires and bird habitat by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      I personally hated it back then as a kid, but now, three decades later, looking at people who never have moved beyond the town of their birth, I am grateful for the experience and the perspective it gave me.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
  2. Who can afford it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Most people can't afford to eat in downtown SF restaurants. A "cheap" meal that isn't from a fast food chain is $15-$25. Sitting down will cost you significantly more. No one that values their health eats food from a street vendor, so I'll not include them.

    1. Re:Who can afford it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      No one that values their health would live in San Francisco either.

    2. Re:Who can afford it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I get where you are coming from, as I too despise the tipping culture, but unfortunately tipping is expected (with tipped jobs even having a lower minimum wage than non-tipped) and 10% hasn't been the default for a long time. If you want to protest against minimum wage, then by all means do so. But shorting your server is not the way to do it.

    3. Re:Who can afford it? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Americans are often way too cautious on the cleanliness of food. A street vendor vs a higher end chain restaurant, you have roughly the same shot on getting food poisoning. A clean stainless steel stove vs a semi-rusted cart really doesn't effect how well the food is prepared or its general safety. Often at the higher quality places, the food is actually more dangerous because the Chiefs will often strive to get the food right at the safe limit level where often you will get uncooked meat, or at an unsafe temperature. Vs. say a random Hotdog cart, where you have an overcooked hotdog that has been cooking for much longer then needed.

      Many food we eat have their taste based on the process of bacteria, fungal, and other chemical reactions based on the previous life forms decaying after death.

      However in terms of cost. Unless you are going to the grocery store and cooking at home, You are going to be paying more for the service. When I got laid off in 2008, I needed to save money until I got a job (a week later) but I bought a full chicken for $5.00 and I had dinner for a week, baked it, saved some of the leftovers for sandwiches, boiled down the bones and made soup, with some veggies. But that took a lot of work and planning.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    4. Re:Who can afford it? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Please explain?

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    5. Re:Who can afford it? by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      Killer Muni busses.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    6. Re:Who can afford it? by OrangeTide · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Americans are often way too cautious on the cleanliness of food.

      An E. Coli outbreak every year or two, like in the romaine lettuce outbreak, tells me that Americans are rightfully cautious of the cleanliness of their food.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    7. Re:Who can afford it? by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      An E. Coli outbreak every year or two,

      Every year or two? It seems like once every month or two (although the last one I saw was listeria, and it was after the Romaine lettuce nationwide panic). That tells me that Americans are not cautious enough.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    8. Re:Who can afford it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      most of the life threatening cases of E. Coli in our food supply are the strain found in humans, not cattle. The sanitation on the farm site and processing facility is the issue.

    9. Re:Who can afford it? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      No, it is over caution that causes the outbreaks.

      You don't hear about these outbreaks in Africa, South Asia, or other places where filth is common, because people are constantly exposed to E. coli and other common intestinal and skin bacteria. So everyone's intestines are toughened up and resistant to infection. The only exception is very young children who often die of diarrhea from intestinal infections.

    10. Re:Who can afford it? by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 2

      Those places with filth have lower life expectancy for a reason. You don't hear about it because it's not news. It happens too often. Also, most US/European news tends to ignore what happens in Africa and South Asia unless it's the business section focusing on outsourcing. Lastly, you are, of course, just wring. Here's a quick-to-find example

      And

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    11. Re:Who can afford it? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      I find this hard to believe to be honest. Many restaurants in NYC (Manhattan) have "lunch specials" that are $10-11+tax (9%). With 20% tip, that's about $14.50. With 15% tip, just under $14.

      And this is in a fairly wealthy part of the city, not on an outlying part of the island. Why would Austin be that much more expensive?

    12. Re:Who can afford it? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Yep. I've never got food poisoning from a street vendor, but did get intractable, two-week-long, stomach-cramping trots'n'vomits from a supposedly high-end restaurant.

    13. Re:Who can afford it? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Greece, Italy, Costa Rica, and Portugal all beat out the US, and none of them are as antiseptic and germaphobic as the US.

    14. Re:Who can afford it? by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      They have less industrial food production too. With industry comes a need for higher standards.

      But the real question is "did the US health improve when this changed" And it did.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
  3. I don't think so by wyattstorch516 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The more likely explanation in San Francisco is that people are crapping on the sidewalk. There's nothing like the smell of human feces out in the sun to build up an appetite.

    1. Re:I don't think so by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

      San Francisco probably smells like Bangalore https://www.npr.org/2018/08/01...

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    2. Re:I don't think so by PrimaryConsult · · Score: 1

      1. People use public restrooms in stores and restaurants to shoot up, others smear feces everywhere, still others vandalize
      2. Store owners put "customers only" and use some technological means to enforce (a buzzer, door code printed on receipt, in one place I saw a mall food court guard checking receipts and writing the door code for the day on the back).
      3. Homeless have nowhere to "go", so fuck it, they defecate in the streets.

      The irony is, cities "less friendly" to druggies and obviously homeless have less of the problems in (1), so (2) doesn't happen, and because the homeless who are there make an effort to "blend in" (wearing clothes, using showers in shelters to avoid smelling like goats, etc) will therefore have no issue with getting a bathroom to use or a place to sit and chill for a day.

    3. Re:I don't think so by SinGunner · · Score: 1

      Dodged fresh crap at least 3 times while walking ~1 mile during my morning commute. Who was out crapping on the sidewalk on Christmas night? However, it was cold, so none of it smelled bad, unlike the warm broccoli fart smell as I walked by Lake Merritt. Bay Area is disgusting.

    4. Re:I don't think so by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      For 1., stop criminalizing addiction. Sale of heroin should remain illegal, use should be a medical issue, not one for the police. If people aren't worried about being arrested, then they won't have to hide in public restrooms to shoot up. Better yet, have safe injection locations like in some European countries.

  4. What is the problem? by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 4, Informative
    Most street food in India is made with questionable ingredients, loaded with fat, salt and harsh spices, made in unsanitary conditions, sold by vendors who pay protection money to the local thugs, and the local police...

    Good thing there are canteens in the affluent tech campuses, at least now we can begin to give the bus boys, bearers and waiters some decent wages, and treat them like human beings.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:What is the problem? by chthon · · Score: 4, Funny

      C.M.O.T. Dibbler is Indian?

    2. Re:What is the problem? by Stonent1 · · Score: 2

      Translation, they decided oh those poor street vendors, but forgot there are people trying to make a living off of cleaning tables mopping floors and serving food inside the building. Not to mention the cooks, farmers, delivery drivers all that make their wages related to the company.

    3. Re:What is the problem? by techno-vampire · · Score: 2

      No, but his relative "May I never achieve enlightenment" Dhibalah is.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    4. Re:What is the problem? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      So they have Hotdogs in India too. Good to know.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    5. Re:What is the problem? by i.r.id10t · · Score: 3, Informative

      Almost ... May-I-Never-Achieve-Enlightenment Dhiblang

      The canonical Dibbler run down -

              Disembowel-Meself-Honourably Dibhala sold suspiciously fresh thousand-year eggs in the Agatean Empire (Interesting Times).
              Cut-Me-Own-Hand-Off Dhblah sold disturbingly live yoghurt in Omnia (Small Gods). In Discworld 2, his name is wrongly spelt D'blah and gives secrets about pyramid power in Djelybebi.
              Al-Jiblah, a merchant in Klatch (Jingo).
              Fair Go Dibbler sold the archetypal pie floaters on the lost continent of Fourecks (The Last Continent).
              May-I-Never-Achieve-Enlightenment Dhiblang is apparently from Hublands 'wisdom country', based on the name and his selling of disreputable yak-butter tea; mentioned in The Last Continent.
              Dib Diblossonson sold bottomless smorgasbord in the Hubland barbarian fjords; mentioned in The Last Continent.
              May-I-Be-Kicked-In-My-Own-Ice-Hole Dibooki apparently only gathered whale meat after a conveniently beached whale had exploded into bite-sized chunks of its own accord; mentioned in The Last Continent.
              Swallow-Me-Own-Blowdart Dhlang-Dhlang sold green beer, location unknown but suspected to be tropical rain forest, possibly Howondaland; mentioned in The Last Continent.
              Point-Me-Own-Bone Dibjla, an Aboriginal Dibbler from Fourecks in the Discworld 2 PC game.

      And of course, the theme continues in really good fanfic like the works of AA Pessimal

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
  5. On-site food service... by sillivalley · · Score: 3, Interesting

    When Apple was planning the Infinite Loop Campus, the city (Cupertino) insisted Apple have on-site food service -- they were afraid of the traffic that would be caused by all those employees going off to forage for lunch over more or less the same period of time.

    But now providing such services are unfair to local businesses?

    I know, logically you can't have it both ways, but arguments such as this are seldom based in logic.

    1. Re:On-site food service... by alvinrod · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There's a part of the tech press (or perhaps just the press in general) that is merely content to complain about anything as clickbait sees just as much (if not more) consumption than anything requiring significant journalistic undertaking while consuming far less effort to produce. You can almost rest assured that if Apple had not included a cafeteria (or other form of food service) that the same writers would be complaining about the added traffic or how the tech employees are overcrowding the local eateries and pushing locals out.

      Occasionally you can even find articles from one of those perpetuate whiners that are at complete odds with each other and argue the opposite sides of some problem. It's almost as though they start with the conclusion and then fill in the remaining bits of their articles.

    2. Re:On-site food service... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I guarantee 99% of such articles are written by those under 40. Pampered, spoiled, self righteous kids who grew up into insufferable adults. They have almost no real life experience outside their enclaves and spoiled university educations. They feel guilty about their lives so they try to take up the cause of someone "wronged" by society, technology, government, or corporations. Usually this comes out in limp wristed publications like The Atlantic, or Salon, or elsewhere.

      The fact that slashdot pushes these twisted piles of journalistic garbage is beyond me. It isn't really limited to just one of their editors, although this one is worse than most and is well hated here.

    3. Re:On-site food service... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      Journalism is dead. I watch ABC news with David Muir and every goffam night it's shit served up, word for word by every other goddam news outlet:

      - Trump sucks

      - Bad weather

      - A story they covered last night

      - A video that was viral all last week (almost free citizen journalism)

      - Person of the week (also YouTube)

      - Made in America showing a proud mom and pop selling 4 SKUs

      Changing channels is futile.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    4. Re:On-site food service... by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      I know, logically you can't have it both ways, but arguments such as this are seldom based in logic.

      Of course it's logical. There's some optimal number of people going out for lunch (this number may change over time). When Apple built it's campus, the change in lunch-seekers was would make there be too many too fast, so they wanted to reduce it. Now, there are too few lunchers.

      See the iconic Republican example of "A 0% tax rate and a 100% tax rate both produce 0 revenue, but a middle point produces some.", or look at any quadratic function.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    5. Re:On-site food service... by fermion · · Score: 1
      Many large organizations and building have on site food service. Logistically getting people in and out for food is inefficient. This is why some firms actually give away food and snacks.

      This is not function of fairness, however. It is simply a function of how people get around. If everyone has a car, then they will more than likely drive to work, eat at work, and drive home, especially in a speed out place like Apple.

      Street food is an artifact of walking culture, and people who need affordable quick food. Who you see street food go away it is more than likely a result of the loss of foot traffic and people having more time to eat.

      I have seen this.. As a small town becomes more affluent and more people drive, more of the food moves inside. In nearby big cities, where they is still a lot of foot traffic and people work far from home, there is still a lot of street food. This is especially true around busy bus stops

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    6. Re:On-site food service... by mentil · · Score: 1

      Have you tried getting your news from comedians?

      --
      Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    7. Re:On-site food service... by CaptainDork · · Score: 2

      No. The comedians are all going after the conservative right wing Evangelical White Supremacist Christian batshit crazy Trump supporters.

      The punch lines are all the same and I heard them back in 2016.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  6. Similarities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    San Francisco : piles of shit in the street, street food popularity declines.
    Bangalore : piles of shit in the street, street food popularity declines.

    Who woulda thunk it?!

    1. Re:Similarities by Red_Forman · · Score: 1

      Everyone except dung beetles.

  7. s/Tech/Large campuses/ by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 2

    All large corporate campuses ever have had this affect. "Street food" is not anything worthy of promotion or protection. On campus food service has been a thing for longer than the dipshit author of this article has been alive. The fact that it also happens in motherfucking California is meaningless.

    Get this shit off Slashdot. I can't believe I wasted six sentences on such blithering idiocy.

    1. Re:s/Tech/Large campuses/ by dwpro · · Score: 1

      s/affect/effect/, in homage to slashdot pedantry.

      --
      Millions long for immortality who do not know what to do with themselves on a rainy Sunday afternoon. -- Susan Ertz
  8. Re:once killed a business model just to watch it d by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

    They are. Even if it's cheaper AND easier to make food at home, they will still go out because #imafoodie means you have to Instagram or post from the latest popup restaurant or no one will like your posts and you'll die from the lack of affirmation.

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  9. Am I the only one by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    ... who brings a lunch to work most days?

    I guess I'm killing off the street food vendors as well... although I don't live in either San Francisco or Bangalore.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  10. In India yeah by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    but TFA makes it clear that in California the big corps are making "Company Towns" with their own kitchens. This is especially galling since those corps often get massive tax breaks with the assumption that they'll be lots and low skill service sector jobs to support them. Those jobs exist, but not directly inside the community proper. Instead they're clustered in the suburb where the company set up shop.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:In India yeah by alvinrod · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm not really sure what your issue with this actually is. If you're trying to complain that the company cafeteria jobs harm the food service jobs outside of the company, I'm not sure how that works. If the company just moved in and brought all of those employees, the extra mouths to feed weren't there previously and unless the company captures 100% of employee meals, the outside providers get some added business. Even if the company does capture 100% of employee meals, they still need to hire additional food service job positions to supply all of those meals, which does create some additional low skill positions.

      Now, unless the company set up shop in a wheat field, abandoned lot, or something similar they probably replaced some people who were previously patronizing local food providers, so there is a chance for them to see decreased business. However, in order to provide food services (whether in a cafeteria, or other form) the company has to hire people to fill those positions. If someone previously working at Lou's Diner moves over to the kitchen at Mega Corp. does anything really change from their perspective? They might even see a pay bump if Mega Corp. wants to staff the positions quickly.

      Also, if the jobs are closer to where the workers are, how is that a bad thing either. That means less driving (and the traffic and pollution that accompany it) and doesn't necessarily mean that local business has to suffer either. I've seen a few companies that have local restaurants do catering once in a while. Even with all of that, there's nothing that prevents employees from going out for lunch either. This overwrought concern just comes across as you looking for some way to construe this a problem when there isn't one there.

    2. Re:In India yeah by rsborg · · Score: 2

      but TFA makes it clear that in California the big corps are making "Company Towns" with their own kitchens. This is especially galling since those corps often get massive tax breaks with the assumption that they'll be lots and low skill service sector jobs to support them. Those jobs exist, but not directly inside the community proper. Instead they're clustered in the suburb where the company set up shop.

      They fixed this in France (when I was working there in y2k) by having a government subsidized meals program that (all) employers could opt-into where employees get coupons that subsidize their meals for local restaurants (naturally employees paid for these coupon books but it was more or less mandatory). Company/client where I worked also had a cantina, but it didn't qualify for the coupons... they were only for restaurants.

      The food ecosystem was maintained, the local farms had produce clients and "centralized/outsourcing" food producution wasn't promoted. They had a vibrant restaurant scene in a smaller metro that way.

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    3. Re:In India yeah by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This seems really stupid. If restaurant owners deserve to be subsidized by the taxpayer, why not just do it directly by giving them money? That way they wouldn't even have to make any food. They could just collect their subsidy checks while relaxing at home in front of the TV, and the tech workers could eat at the cantina which they obviously prefer. So everybody wins.

      Doing it indirectly via vouchers just adds a lot of unnecessary bureaucracy, while giving everyone a suboptimal outcome.

  11. There was never true "street food" in the Bay Area by guacamole · · Score: 1

    You gotta be joking. I have been living there for about 20 years.

  12. "Street food" - sold in buildings by TJHook3r · · Score: 1

    One of my pet hates is street food sold in restaurants! Why?! It's not even eaten in the street, let alone cooked there! The whole point is to eat cheap, tasty food in an interesting atmosphere - you usually get one of those three at most.

  13. Grubhub is probably a big part of this problem by Harvey+Manfrenjenson · · Score: 1

    Online ordering was the biggest story in the restaurant business this year-- if you're running a restaurant, you either adapted to the trend or you went broke, probably. Unless you're Thomas Keller or somebody like that. I'm sure it's hurting the food vendors too.

    The best part? If you want to have any online sales, you have to sign up with a monopoly like Grubhub, which takes a whopping 13.5% cut of each transaction (on average). Suddenly the food vendor, who is trying to lift himself above poverty level and is struggling with razor-thin margins, has to hand over 13.5% of his gross receipts to a Silicon Valley millionaire.

    1. Re:Grubhub is probably a big part of this problem by mentil · · Score: 1

      They just raise their prices 10%, boom done. Credit card companies already took 3.5%.

      --
      Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    2. Re:Grubhub is probably a big part of this problem by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      We're talking about food vendors, right? Most food carts aren't on Grubhub or Seamless -- they just park outside of locations that have lots of "walk in" customers (train/subway stations, office buildings, universities, etc). They typically take cash as payment, though some are starting to accept cards.

    3. Re:Grubhub is probably a big part of this problem by Harvey+Manfrenjenson · · Score: 1

      I'm sure they're not on Grubhub, and I don't even know if you can sign up for Grubhub if you're a food vendor. The point though is that Grubhub has reduced the number of traditional restaurant visits so it's probably reducing sales for vendors as well.

  14. Bullshit story by Khyber · · Score: 1

    Yea, you aren't killing off street food vendors any more than you're killing off the homeless.

    Reach harder, Slashdot. Maybe get some editors with brains.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    1. Re:Bullshit story by mentil · · Score: 1

      Anyone out after curfew will be culled by the hunter-killer robots.
      Today, homeless harass poor robots/vending machines in Silicon Valley.
      But soon... they will have their revenge!

      --
      Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
  15. Start with better food by sverdlichenko · · Score: 1

    Iâ(TM)d completely support the idea of having alunch in the local restaurant in Paris or London. But in the Bay Area, or even Seattle or Boston, finding good and not a too expensive place to eat within walking distance from the office is an unlikely event. Best you can hope for is a sandwich from the street vendor, or in the cafe at best. Compare this with the in-office cafeteria with an inexpensive three-course meal, and the choice is clear.
    If local businesses want to feed tech workers, the first thing to do is to start serving better food.

  16. Sounds like 'first-world problems' to me by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    Why is this even a news story?

  17. How to fix this by AHuxley · · Score: 2, Interesting

    1. Wall off your factory, industrial park.
    2. Build a canteen/cafeteria area as needed.
    3. Have the best cooks with a food inspection program.
    4. Healthy workers are productive workers.

    Workers do not have to face the trash, crime and waste of the city outside.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    1. Re:How to fix this by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      What if they WANT to "face the trash, crime, and waste?" Not everyone is a OCD coward like yourself.

    2. Re:How to fix this by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Brands will think more about what health risks their workers face wondering around a city that's failing.
      Health costs for the brand and days away from work are not "free".
      Re "actually want to be part of our cities"
      Thats great if the city is well policed and has enforced laws.
      Who wants to pay off their loans in a city surrounded by crime and trash?
      A good education and a great job should be the pathway to a better quality of life in a really great city. Not getting to walk around a city thats failed.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  18. The Inner Platform Effect by aquabat · · Score: 1

    Back in California, some of the Bay Area's massive tech campuses have become mini cities, complete with their own closed food systems.

    For some reason, this made me think of the design of modern web browsers. Instead of using and supporting existing resources, they're internally re-implementing what they need.

    --
    A republic cannot succeed till it contains a certain body of men imbued with the principles of justice and honour.
  19. BS. You can't kill a scene that didn't exist. by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

    San Francisco never had a "street food" scene, the likes of which you'd find in Thailand, Vietnam, or the like, in the first place. We never even had Singapore-style hawker centers; though SOMA StrEATs and Spark Social may come close. We had the Tamale Lady, Virginia Ramos, who literally died. And she was in the process of opening an actual restaurant when she passed. So she'd no longer have counted as street food anyway. We have the bacon-wrapped hot dog vendors, who are far from dead; but can easily be found all over the place. We had the guys who'd roam parks and street fairs selling edibles. And legalized pot put many of them, and not a few other drug dealers, out of business even when it was just "medical" and not recreational.

    And then there are the food trucks. While they literally drive to their locations on the street, they, in no way, resemble "street food". Plus, they're thriving too. They're very popular and all over town. And there're even apps to help you find your favorite truck.

    --
    Imagine all the people...
  20. What's so special about tech doing this? by shilly · · Score: 1

    Many, many large scale institution have their own cafeterias, often with partial or total subsidy of food costs. Universities do; many factories do; hospitals do; accountancy firm offices do; etc etc. I don't understand what makes it worse when it's a tech firm doing this.

  21. Re:Most of us who live in cities want to live ther by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    The problem AC is that the city tax rates can no longer look after city streets.
    The skilled and expensive tech workers face health risks and crime wondering around in a city for hours.
    Skilled workers that then are too sick to work.
    Then move to better much managed part of the USA?
    The brand then has to attract people into that city.
    What are the reviews of that part of the city? Parked RV, waste, trash and crime, tent cities? Taxes and housing costs?
    Who wants to study for years and have no quality of life? While paying housing costs and new city taxes?
    City governments demanding more in city tax, placing demands on the tech sector.

    The solutions are
    Gentrification around the tech sector.
    To clean up the streets and allow city police to enforce laws.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"