Slashdot Mirror


Almost a Third of New Cars Sold In Norway Last Year Were Pure Electric (reuters.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Reuters: Almost a third of new cars sold in Norway last year were pure electric, a new world record as the country strives to end sales of fossil-fueled vehicles by 2025. In a bid to cut carbon emissions and air pollution, Norway exempts battery-driven cars from most taxes and offers benefits such as free parking and charging points to hasten a shift from diesel and petrol engines. The independent Norwegian Road Federation (NRF) said on Wednesday that electric cars rose to 31.2 percent of all sales last year, from 20.8 percent in 2017 and just 5.5 percent in 2013, while sales of petrol and diesel cars plunged. The sales figures consolidate Norway's global lead in electric car sales per capita, part of an attempt by Western Europe's biggest producer of oil and gas to transform to a greener economy. For comparison, electric cars had a 2.2 percent share in China in 2017 and 1.2 percent in the United States, according to IEA data.

213 comments

  1. The best pushers are not users by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    part of an attempt by Western Europe's biggest producer of oil and gas

    The best drug dealers know never to use the stuff they sell. :-)

    That said, the fact that so many people in Norway can go electric shows the cars are pretty much viable anywhere in large numbers.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:The best pushers are not users by sycodon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Norway generates about 90% of it's electrical power via Hydro.

      That, and the fact the country could fit into Texas twice, you have the perfect place for electric cars.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    2. Re:The best pushers are not users by 110010001000 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      More BS. "So many people". That amount to about 44,000 cars sold in a year. That means 0.008% of the population bought an EV. More hype from Tesla shysters trying to pump up the stock by convincing everyone that people are buying $60,000+ cars in large numbers.

    3. Re:The best pushers are not users by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

      The more impressive thing to me is not so much the sheer numbers numbers, but the percentages in an environment that is one of the worst for electric cars (cold temperatures affecting batteries, lots of need for running a heater for the interior).

      That meany people (yes 44k is still fair numbers of people) tells you a lot about wider acceptance.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    4. Re:The best pushers are not users by 110010001000 · · Score: 0

      It isn't impressive at all. You give rich people tax-breaks, no tolls, free parking, no import/purchase tax, no road tax, ability to drive in bus lanes and you will have a large number of them will run out and get one to complement their Range Rover. The Jaguar iPace is the fastest selling EV there. These isn't "wide acceptance" at all.

    5. Re:The best pushers are not users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would say that distance and space are factors. In countries like Paraguay where they produce 51 terawatts of power, but only use 4, electric cars make perfect sense.

      However, here in the US, the 50-75 mile range of an electric vehicle isn't really doable. Unless you are rich and can afford seven digits for a flat in town, you are likely living on the outskirts, and commuting, 25-30 miles each way. Electric cars burn no power idling, other than A/C and other subsystems, which is better in traffic, but if there is a detour that means 20-30 more miles, that can mean one would have to pull over and get a tow.

      I wish someone would make an EV that used a generator that is not connected to the power train in any way, shape, or form. It just runs at an optimal RPM and keeps the battery bank charged. This way, you have no issues of range anxiety, but still able to do day to day life using zero fossil fuel.

    6. Re:The best pushers are not users by amorsen · · Score: 4, Informative

      The most popular car sold in Norway last year was the Leaf, not the iPace.

      Correcting your trolling is tedious, but someone has to do it.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    7. Re:The best pushers are not users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you a fucking idiot? What electric can't at least 200 miles on a charge? An extra 30 miles in a 60 mile commute is not a fucking problem and hasn't been since the mid 1970's when the Vanguard Citicar was not all the rage.

      numbnuts

    8. Re:The best pushers are not users by Rei · · Score: 2

      However, here in the US, the 50-75 mile range of an electric vehicle...

      Since you're apparently connecting to the internet from the 1990s: Short Pets.com. Buy Amazon.

      --
      Musk needs a safer hobby than Twitter. Fire juggling? Cage fighting? Solo hot air balloon trips?
    9. Re:The best pushers are not users by reboot246 · · Score: 2

      Not all commutes are so short.

      Last week I worked Wednesday, Thursday, and Friday in three different cities. My shortest "commute" was 204 miles round trip. The longest one was 280 miles. Once at work I averaged driving about 50 miles each day. Is there an electric half-ton pickup truck that could replace my truck?

      Those jobs were fairly close to home. Sometimes I will put 400 or 500 miles on the truck in one day. I'd love to have an electric truck with that kind of range.

    10. Re:The best pushers are not users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This story has nothing to do with Tesla. You never fucking shut up about Tesla do you.

    11. Re: The best pushers are not users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, but you forget. Norway is one of those evil socialist countries. Their socialist redistribution of wealth, free education & healthcare, etc., allow them to show off all their latest technological developments to envious 3rd world countries like the USA.

    12. Re:The best pushers are not users by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Yes there are electric half-ton pickup truck EVs with a great range, but all of the 2017 models got bought by the French farmers happily switching to EV. You will have to wait your turn to get one.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    13. Re:The best pushers are not users by 110010001000 · · Score: 2

      No it wasn't, moron. The best selling EV in Norway cumulative is the Leaf. The FASTEST selling EV LAST YEAR was the iPace. Christ, people are so dumb here. They call me a "troll" because they don't know any facts.

    14. Re:The best pushers are not users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In 2017, Norway sold about 150,000 new cars total. 31% is around 49,000 cars. That is for the year total. Even Tesla makes more than that in a year!

    15. Re:The best pushers are not users by quenda · · Score: 1

      Norway generates about 90% of it's electrical power via Hydro.

      That, and the fact the country could fit into Texas twice, you have the perfect place for electric cars.

      That, and a trillion dollars of oil profits in the sovereign wealth funds, meaning you can afford big subsidies to help make the guilt go away.

    16. Re:The best pushers are not users by UsuallyReasonable · · Score: 1

      "What electric can't at least 200 miles on a charge?"

      The Nissan Leaf, for one. Almost all the rest, for another.

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wik...

      So really you have no idea what you're talking about, but you call someone else an idiot.

    17. Re:The best pushers are not users by UsuallyReasonable · · Score: 1

      That's pretty much exactly what the Chevy Volt does and, I believe, the BMW i3.

    18. Re: The best pushers are not users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US produces way more oil than Norway. Where is our sovereign wealth fund enabling us to pay for societally nice things?

    19. Re: The best pushers are not users by quenda · · Score: 1

      The US produces way more oil than Norway. Where is our sovereign wealth fund enabling us to pay for societally nice things?

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    20. Re:The best pushers are not users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One out of every 125 people is pretty impressive if you ask me.

    21. Re:The best pushers are not users by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Yeah but it's bloody cold in Norway. If they had an American attitude, they would be burning fossil fuels like nobodies business to make their country more habitable and of course making Texas more uninhabitable, from flooded coast to burning lands. I don't think Norwegians know how rabid dog eat rabid dog capitalism works.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    22. Re:The best pushers are not users by LostMyBeaver · · Score: 1

      I disagree.

      I am a BMW i3 driver in Norway. And I'm an American by birth and I've traveled to about 80 countries in my life.

      Electric cars work extremely well here in Norway because of trust.

      Yesterday, when I tried to transport stuff from my office to my house and it wouldn't fit in my car, I went to Ikea and for about $40, rented a massive van for 3 hours which I used to pick up my stuff, move it and then returned the vehicle.

      Norway, Sweden, Denmark and to a more limited extent Finland are the most trusting countries in the world. This extends to insurance plans and many other areas.

      As such, cars with limited range are far more practical in these countries.

      Norway also severely punishes people for driving. And the worse the vehicle, the worse the punishment. What I mean is that driving 5 year old diesel in Oslo will bankrupt all but the richest people. It's far more cost effective to buy a new $50,000 car every few years than to drive a diesel station wagon.

      This doesn't come without its downsides.

      Young couples will either have to delay or completely rethink parenthood starting now because they will be taxed VERY heavily if they inherit mom and dad's old gas or diesel station wagon to use to transport their kids to and from day care. Not only are we charging more for gas and diesel, but we charge double at the toll booths for people driving during rush hour which are the only hours compatible with day care.

      If you were to drive a diesel station wagon from one side of town to the other during rush hour (quite common since Oslo is small), you would pay 178 Norwegian crowns a day or about $19 a day for toll booths where an electric car driving outside rush hour would pay about $1.20 a day. This is $3800 a year (net income, or as much as $7000 a year gross income revenue) for diesel during rush hour vs. $200 (net, $400 gross) for electric outside rush hour.

      Then there's parking costs. Electric cars park free on the streets. All others (including hybrid) pay about $3-$10 an hour.

      We actually can't afford to drive anything other than brand new electric cars in Oslo. Consider that a 5 year loan for an electric car is paid for completely by the money saved by getting rid of a diesel. In fact, when you add in the cost of EU control, the cost of gas, etc... buying a brand new BMW i3 is actually substantially cheaper than continuing to drive a gas vehicle.

      But it won't work in someplace like the UK or the US. These are protectionist societies. We assume everyone is guilty until proven innocent.... actually... we assume everyone is guilty and if they're proven innocent we congratulate their lawyers for being so damn good. Unless you live in a society of trust, you can't make a change this big. You have to actually be willing to work together towards something better.

    23. Re:The best pushers are not users by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      If you are trying to say that the fastest EV you can buy is the iPace, that would also be a false claim.

      Jaguar put out some BS numbers earlier in the year, but when the models actually went into production, they were slower than the top of the line Model S. Actually, the are slower than an AWD Model 3 (not even the performance model).

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    24. Re:The best pushers are not users by WindowsStar · · Score: 1

      Even if 90% of their electricity is hydro, the batteries are still made with heavy environmental pollution and disposing of the batteries another environment nightmare. This world needs to embrace hydrogen cars where with a small modification you are able to convert a gasoline vehicle. The universe is made of 75% hydrogen so there is no chance of running out.

    25. Re: The best pushers are not users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Van hire is not a concept unique to Scandinavia. It exists in most of the developed world.

    26. Re:The best pushers are not users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hello and welcome from cryochamber... Hydrogen cars DOES NOT burn hydrogen in an ICE. They use fuel cells because this is more efficient way to use precious fuel as producing and storing H2 is expensive and it does not matter that we have full ocean of H2O ;) . So hydro cars are EV's with fuel cell instead of battery. And that fuel cell weights somewhere the same as the comparable power battery. Also fuel cell production also involves fancy chemistry. SO for the moment batteries are the way forward.

    27. Re: The best pushers are not users by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      You pissed it away. Just like we did. At least we got "socially nice things" but we paid for them directly with oil & gas revenues, instead of setting up a fund and spending the proceeds of that.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    28. Re:The best pushers are not users by hazardPPP · · Score: 1

      Unless you are rich and can afford seven digits for a flat in town, you are likely living on the outskirts, and commuting, 25-30 miles each way.

      These numbers looked quite suspect to me, so I did some googling, and found that the average American commute (driven, so I guess but I'm not sure that this excludes people walking, cycling, and taking public transport) is 16 miles one way, about two-thirds to half of what you state. Yes that's an average, so I'm sure there are lots of people driving 25-30 miles, I'm sure there are people driving more than 50 miles, but to say that one is "likely" to be driving 25-30 miles unless they are rich doesn't sound very plausible to me.

    29. Re:The best pushers are not users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That, and the fact the country could fit into Texas twice, you have the perfect place for electric cars.

      Didn't really think that through, did you?
      Edge to edge Texas is 800 miles while Norway is 1100 miles.
      Surface area isn't all that relevant when trying to drive somewhere.

      Not that it really matters, no-one has a commute close to either of those ranges.
      In fact, geography doesn't have much impact on commuting range. It is typically limited with how much time people are willing to spend in the car.
      The commuting time is work related hours you don't get paid for. If it gets too long you look for another job or move closer.

      So, since electric cars get a range that covers any reasonable commute distance the geography kinda became irrelevant.
      What makes the difference is politics.
      Norway have decided to go carbon neutral and with the power grid being completely hydroelectric it makes sense to focus on cars so they subsidize electric vehicles.

    30. Re:The best pushers are not users by hazardPPP · · Score: 1

      That, and the fact the country could fit into Texas twice, you have the perfect place for electric cars.

      Norway is less densely populated than Texas, most of its cities are along the coast (and bit inland, with the Oslo area being the only big "intrusion" of relatively high-density population farther inland), and it's elongated shape and inhospitable terrain probably means (though I haven't checked) that it takes quite a bit longer to drive from one end of Norway to another then from one end of Texas to another.

      In other words, Norway is not Denmark. Also, the climate in Texas is far more favourable for EVs than the climate in Norway.

    31. Re:The best pushers are not users by Rei · · Score: 1

      The top 5 best selling BEVs in the US this year are, in order:

        * Tesla Model 3 (primarily the LR version, 310 miles, but also some MRs, 265mi).
        * Tesla Model X (237-295mi)
        * Tesla Model S (259-335mi)
        * Chevy Bolt (238mi)
        * Nissan Leaf (150mi, but next year's version ("E-Plus") is expected to be about 225mi; it was supposed to have already been unveiled but got delayed due to the Ghosn debacle)

      Other well anticipated EVs coming early next year are the Hyundai Kona (258mi) and the Kia Niro (~250mi). Also in the running, Jaguar I-Pace started sales at the end of this year (234mi), at low volumes. Audi E-Tron starts sales next year (~240mi).

      --
      Musk needs a safer hobby than Twitter. Fire juggling? Cage fighting? Solo hot air balloon trips?
    32. Re:The best pushers are not users by Rei · · Score: 1

      ED: ** this year's version. I forgot, it's 2019 now! :)

      --
      Musk needs a safer hobby than Twitter. Fire juggling? Cage fighting? Solo hot air balloon trips?
    33. Re:The best pushers are not users by hazardPPP · · Score: 1

      We actually can't afford to drive anything other than brand new electric cars in Oslo. Consider that a 5 year loan for an electric car is paid for completely by the money saved by getting rid of a diesel. In fact, when you add in the cost of EU control, the cost of gas, etc... buying a brand new BMW i3 is actually substantially cheaper than continuing to drive a gas vehicle. But it won't work in someplace like the UK or the US. These are protectionist societies. We assume everyone is guilty until proven innocent.... actually... we assume everyone is guilty and if they're proven innocent we congratulate their lawyers for being so damn good. Unless you live in a society of trust, you can't make a change this big. You have to actually be willing to work together towards something better.

      Norway's approach is to tax the hell out of ICE cars and then not tax the electric cars, thus making the electrics, as you explain, quite a bit cheaper (but still expensive in absolute terms). This approach makes sense in Norway as it is a small yet rich country that imports basically all of its cars. Since Norway does not have large scale auto manufacturers, it cannot make large enough investments/subsidies to make EVs cheaper than ICVs without resorting to taxation.

      The US, the UK, France, Germany, China, and Japan for example on the other hand - they can, because they have large auto manufacturers whose production plans they can affect. You can give them tax breaks and research funds to develop EVs, and so on. Whereas Norway cannot really squeeze GM or Ford but has to resort to squeezing its own citizens (who, luckily, can afford being squeezed), the US can squeeze GM and force it to make EVs (if it wanted to). I've come in any case to the conclusion that if we really want to avoid completely wrecking the planet, we simply have to set a date after which the production of things using CO2-emitting technologies will simply be banned. For example, no new ICVs allowed to be made after 2030. You've got 10 years to figure out how to switch to a fully EV fleet, do it. Then repeat for other industries, wherever possible.

    34. Re:The best pushers are not users by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Not all commutes are so short.

      Indeed but most are.

      Is there an electric half-ton pickup truck that could replace my truck?

      Why do you drive a half ton truck as opposed to a much smaller, cheaper and cheaper to run compact or alternatively a semi tractor? People have different use cases which is why you have a truck.

      Not everyone's needs are served by electric, especially if they're road warriors. Most people aren't and most people's day to day range is well served by an electric car.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    35. Re:The best pushers are not users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if 90% of their electricity is hydro, the batteries are still made with heavy environmental pollution and disposing of the batteries another environment nightmare.

      FUD.

      You are acting as if localized pollution is as bad as global pollution.

      We can just dump all batteries in the regular landfills and still be better off than if we continue to use combustion engines and coal power plants.
      Heck, you can throw in a couple of nuclear meltdowns in there and still get out ahead compared to fossil fuels.

    36. Re:The best pushers are not users by amorsen · · Score: 1

      The best selling EV 2018 in Norway is the Leaf. That year. Not cumulative.

      You're a troll because you're trolling.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    37. Re:The best pushers are not users by froggyjojodaddy · · Score: 1

      Dude, there's plenty of people buying $60K+ cars. Think of any of the following you might see on any given day and understand they are way more than 60K:

      Mercedes S-Class (practically any model)
      Mercedes E-Class (almost every model)
      Mercedes GL-Class (practically any model)
      BMW 7-Series (practically any model)
      BMW 5, 6 Series (almost every model)
      Audi 6,7,8 Series (almost every model)
      Range Rover (almost every model)
      Jaguar (almost every model)
      Porsche (every model)


      There's probably 30 other models/brands you can add to that list. Hell, my Ford Fusion cost me close to 50K.

    38. Re:The best pushers are not users by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      That, and the fact the country could fit into Texas twice, you have the perfect place for electric cars.

      Yes and no. It's also a country where getting from A to B is often 4 times further thanks to wonderfully windy roads around the amazing scenery.

      Now for powering up a hill as you're driving through the fjords, THAT is perfect for electic cars.

    39. Re:The best pushers are not users by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      No it wasn't, moron. The best selling EV in Norway cumulative is the Leaf. The FASTEST selling EV LAST YEAR was the iPace

      I'm not sure what magic facts you're trying to use here. The iPace didn't do the most sales in the year, it didn't do the most in any month, and didn't do the most in any single day. What about it makes it the fastest selling EV? It's top speed? How long it takes to put down cash and drive out the door? Or some completely other irrelevant and moronic metric that you're trying to use to defend your absurd claim that EVs are for the rich?

      They call me a "troll" because they don't know any facts.

      Actually they call you a troll because the facts are the fact, but you claim to have your own facts.

    40. Re:The best pushers are not users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      95% of all one-way trips are 30 miles (50km) or less:

      * https://nhts.ornl.gov/tables09/fatcat/2009/vt_TRPMILES.html

      35% of car trips are two miles or less.

      Optimize for the common case, as the old programmer saying goes.

    41. Re:The best pushers are not users by jarlsberg71 · · Score: 1

      https://products.rivian.com/
      This looks really promising.

      --
      E8B8B
    42. Re:The best pushers are not users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      95% of a car battery is fully recyclable. Battery electric vehicles are way more efficient, wells-to-wheels, than a hydrogen car. Current hydrogen is obtained by stripping it from fossil fuels and letting the carbon go back into the atmosphere.

      That said, it's _possible_ that hydrogen cars may be a more environmentally sustainable fuel source if we obtain it via electrolysis. But, it only makes sense if there's an over abundance of electricity to power such a power hungry process and to offset the reduced energy efficiency as compared to a BEV.

      Let's not hold off on BEVs until we get there though, it could be another 200 years.

    43. Re: The best pushers are not users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Norway also have a less than replacement rate of population growth. So the question is will the collapsing population result in the loss of national identity before the oil money runs out or will the eventual loss of oil money and aging population result in social collapse before that happens?

      Inquiring minds want to know.

    44. Re:The best pushers are not users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iPace.

      iPace is a car? I thought it had something to do with internet-enabling picante sauce that isn't from New York city.

    45. Re:The best pushers are not users by arcade · · Score: 1

      You have forgotten the shape of Norway. To drive from Lindesnes Fyr in the absolute south, to Kirkenes in the North East, while keeping on Norwegian roads the entire time is a distance of 2788km (1732 miles).

      If we go via Sweden and Finland, this is cut down to 2310km (1435 miles).

      Someone else posted a nice overlay map showing how Norway overlays onto the US.

      The second point is that the country is rather cold during the winter.

      We're also a rather sparsely populated country. Someone claimed that all major cities were within 150 miles of Oslo (except TromsÃ). This is also incorrect.

      Oslo - Kristiansand: 356km (221 miles)
      Oslo - Stavanger: 556km (345 miles)
      Oslo - Bergen: 466km (277 miles)
      Oslo - Trondheim: 495km (307 miles)
      Oslo - BodÃ: 1202km (746 miles)
      Oslo - TromsÃ: 1739km (1080 miles)
      Oslo - Hammerfest: 1864km (1158 miles)
      Oslo - Kirkenes: 2310km (1435 miles)

      It can of course be argued that BodÃ, Hammerfest and Kirkenes isn't major cities, but they're quite important.

      It's quite true that we're mainly Hydropowered, but that isn't the only relevant bit. Electric cars are far more efficient than ICE cars. More of the energy goes straight into moving the car. Furthermore, fossile power plants are far more efficient than ICE engines. Even with electricity conversion losses - you get far more mileage per unit of fossil fuel from a power plant, than from a combustion engine for a car.

      And finally, with regards to it being more polluting to produce the batteries for the EV cars than producing a ICE car - remember that you don't need to dig the materials out of the ground every time to get the so called "rare earth elements". You recycle, cheaply. When we've produced enough batteries once over, 95% of the materials can be recycled and used for new cars. Thus - we have a huge "one time fee" to get the materials, then we only need to keep producing about 5% of them to keep going. Which is very nice indeed.

      --
      "Rune Kristian Viken" - http://www.nwo.no - arca
    46. Re: The best pushers are not users by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Van hire is not a concept unique to Scandinavia. It exists in most of the developed world.

      Yes, I couldn't quite see what that proved about 'trust'. It's not like they gave him the keys and just said "bring it back if you feel like it".

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    47. Re:The best pushers are not users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice job moving the goalposts.

      The OP was claiming EV's had a range under 100 miles.

      numbnuts

  2. Change requires effort, not Twitter lies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Norway exempts battery-driven cars from most taxes and offers benefits such as free parking and charging points to hasten a shift from diesel and petrol engines" = The exact opposite of the head-in-ass US administration.

    1. Re:Change requires effort, not Twitter lies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember when Obama exempted battery-driven cars from most taxes and offers benefits such as free parking and charging points to hasten a shift from diesel and petrol engines.

      Wait...maybe not.

    2. Re:Change requires effort, not Twitter lies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The vast majority of taxes related to car ownership are state and local taxes, so Obama has nothing to do with it.

      The most the feds can do is offer tax incentives on income taxes. The feds can not exempt a car from tolls, private parking garage fees and annual tab renewals.

      numbnuts

    3. Re:Change requires effort, not Twitter lies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the US administration does/doesn't do is a reflection of what the lobbyists want and to a lesser degree what the public wants.

      But lobbyists only care about their business's bottom line, and the public is so easily swayed by propaganda. Not sure what to do about that.

  3. Reasons by 110010001000 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The reason is tax-breaks, no tolls, free parking, no import/purchase tax, no road tax, driving in bus lanes. Saving the environment isn't one of those reasons. The fastest selling EV there is the Jaguar iPace. Clearly it is rich people taking advantage of a government program to make their lives easier while commuting.

    1. Re:Reasons by DogDude · · Score: 1

      So?

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    2. Re:Reasons by amorsen · · Score: 4, Informative

      The fastest selling EV in Norway is the Leaf.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    3. Re:Reasons by ljw1004 · · Score: 1

      The reason is tax-breaks, no tolls, free parking, no import/purchase tax, no road tax, driving in bus lanes. Saving the environment isn't one of those reasons. The fastest selling EV there is the Jaguar iPace. Clearly it is rich people taking advantage of a government program to make their lives easier while commuting.

      I'm not sure what point you're making.

      Also a question... what is the reason behind the various regulations/breaks you listed? My guess is they were put there by legislators in order to save the environment. And the legislators aimed for this goal because they thought their electors would like all the end results (easier lives while commuting, and saving the environment). And that people did indeed vote with both things in mind.

      That would be an entirely typical case of the reasonable and rational attitude "I will vote for burdens that are the right thing to do so long as the burdens are shared fairly by all of society rather than just by me; but of course I like everyone else will act locally to my own best advantage."

    4. Re:Reasons by AHuxley · · Score: 2

      Wait for the gov to go full East Germany with an approved list of electric cars for the poor people who could only afford regular cars.
      What cant be mandated with tax will be regulated with gov approval on what can drive on the gov roads.
      Nordic central planning at its best.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    5. Re:Reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well as a counter example to your "So", The French rioted when Macron tried to increase gas taxes. Not every country is going to give away EV's at the expense of everyone else driving ICE cars. And if they try, some may ask for state heads.

    6. Re:Reasons by swillden · · Score: 4, Informative

      The reason is tax-breaks, no tolls, free parking, no import/purchase tax, no road tax, driving in bus lanes. Saving the environment isn't one of those reasons.

      Saving the environment is the reason for the tax breaks, etc.

      The fastest selling EV there is the Jaguar iPace.

      Trump, is that you?

      From TFA:

      Nissan’s upgraded Leaf electric car was the top-selling car in Norway last year, while other top-selling cars overall ranged from small BMWs and Volkswagens (VOWG_p.DE) to full-size sedans and electric sport utility vehicles by Tesla.

      I can't find whole-year figures that include December, but up through November the Jaguar iPace was #20. The top three were the Leaf, the VW e-Golf and the BMW i3.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    7. Re:Reasons by Kjella · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The fastest selling EV there is the Jaguar iPace.

      It's still only preorders. Top selling cars in Norway 2018:

      1. Nissan Leaf 8.3%
      2. Volkswagen Golf 6.7%
      3. BMW i3 3.8%
      4. Tesla Model X 3.4%
      5. Mitsubishi Outlander 2.9%
      6. Toyota Yaris 2.6%
      7. Volvo XC60 2.5%
      8. Tesla Model S 2.5%
      9. Toyota Rav4 2.5%
      10. Renault Zoe 2.1%

      They don't break the Golf down between the regular one and e-Golf, but that and the Leaf are the big commuter cars. The Leaf starts at $32k, the iPace will start at $68k so for a very different market. Other than that I fully agree it's only because of government sponsorship. But hey, we're voting in "green" politicians (it's either blue-green or red-green, at the moment blue-green) so we get what we vote for. Though it should also be said we have lots of hydro and wind power - not so much solar - so it makes sense to use electricity at home and export the oil and gas. That way we can pretend to be environmentally friendly, as long as the emissions happen somewhere else.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    8. Re:Reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if you compare the price in the US and in Norway for the Leaf and the Volvo XC60, you see why electric cars sell so well... The taxes on ICE cars are huge in Norway...

      Leaf: same price - ~$30K
      XC60: USA: $45K, Norway: $90K

    9. Re:Reasons by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 2

      For a typical EV, that's not just a $7500 savings on registration, but a 25% savings on VAT. For an e-Golf that is an $8,000 savings. Combined, that's about half the price of a gas-powered Golf. Add in no road taxes ($350 per year), no tolls (another $2000 per year), and free parking (if you drove to work 5 days a week - at $30 per day parking - that's $7500 per year in parking fees) and after 2 years the Government has basically given you the cost of the petrol-based Golf. The reason people buy EVs in Norway? Because their high taxes are used to pay them to drive EVs.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    10. Re:Reasons by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      You realize Golfs are ridiculously overpriced, right?

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    11. Re:Reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason is tax-breaks, no tolls, free parking, no import/purchase tax, no road tax, driving in bus lanes. Saving the environment isn't one of those reasons.

      Err...saving the environment is THE REASON (aka goal). All those other things you mentioned are INCENTIVES to encourage the METHOD which is reducing demand for fossil fuels via electric car purchases.

      Someone else has been correcting the rest of your post so I left that off.

    12. Re:Reasons by 110010001000 · · Score: 0

      Not last year. It was the iPace.

    13. Re:Reasons by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      How are you going to "save the environment" by providing tax breaks for metal boxes so rich people have easier time commuting to work? It doesn't make a dent in anything. If you want to "save the environment" you shouldn't be driving around in ANY CAR.

    14. Re:Reasons by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      The FASTEST selling EV was the iPace. The idea that $60k+ cars are "saving the environment" borders on the insane, but is just simply basic stupidity. EVs aren't saving anything.

    15. Re:Reasons by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      That isn't the REASON. How are you saving the environment with incentives on CARS? Totally insane. If you wanted to help the envronment there are a million better ways to give incentives to than cars.

    16. Re:Reasons by ljw1004 · · Score: 1

      How are you going to "save the environment" by providing tax breaks for metal boxes so rich people have easier time commuting to work? It doesn't make a dent in anything. If you want to "save the environment" you shouldn't be driving around in ANY CAR.

      It'd make a huge dent to switch over a country to electric vehicles 100%. And the only question is: what is the most cost-effective way for a society to achieve this transition?

      I think the current model used in Norway and US seems like a really good way for society to leverage the free market - provide small targeted incentives which yes do benefit rich people because their real goal is to encourage innovation and this is the best place for leverage. In this case, we've seen that the benefits really do trickle down to all of society.

    17. Re:Reasons by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      So I am not OK with giving taxpayer backed incentives for the rich so they can have easier lives. Keep that crap in Norway. If you want to "save the environment" do something useful with the money.

    18. Re:Reasons by swillden · · Score: 1

      The FASTEST selling EV was the iPace. The idea that $60k+ cars are "saving the environment" borders on the insane, but is just simply basic stupidity. EVs aren't saving anything.

      Okay, you're definitely either Donald J. Trump or his biggest fanboy. I quoted the article and gave you another link, both of which showed you were wrong, and you just repeated the error. Or lie.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    19. Re:Reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, he can perform simple math, buying an electric vehicle at a premium price is like purchasing your fuel up front with interest. Pretty damn dumb if you ask me, for the privilege you cannot even drive the damn thing long distances.

    20. Re:Reasons by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      And that applies - how? Norway waives your registration fees, waives your 25% VAT, waives your parking fees, waives your road tolls, lets you use bus lanes, and waives your road taxes. For any vehicle, it's a big benefit. The reason EVs are taking over in Norway is the Government is spending literally tens of thousands of tax dollars for each EV, to "encourage" people to buy them. To the extent that in a few years the savings have bought you the car. This is not based on cost of operation - this is direct tax benefits literally buying the car for you.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    21. Re:Reasons by swillden · · Score: 1

      No, he can perform simple math, buying an electric vehicle at a premium price is like purchasing your fuel up front with interest.

      Umm, first, either your reading comprehension or your basic logic skills are lousy. His claim was that the Jaguar i-Pace was the hottest-selling EV in Norway. It's not. The "simple math" required is being able to correctly orient the greater-than symbol, and he got it wrong.

      However, addressing your comment, I did the math, and bought the EV, and am reaping the financial rewards. Actually, it has worked out so well that I've purchased three EVs.

      Here are the high points of the math: My EV costs me $0.01 per mile in electricity. An ICEV that gets 40 mpg at a cost of $2.50 per gallon costs $0.0625 per mile in gasoline. Assuming both cars are driven for 200K miles, the electricity cost will be $2000 while the gasoline cost will be $12500. EVs also require far less maintenance than ICEVs because they're fundamentally simpler. That difference is harder to quantify, but 50 oil changes at $50 each is $2500, plus some extra brake pads and maybe rotors, call it another $500, so $3K. In practice my experience is it's bigger than that (I've been driving an EV for six years now). Assuming a 6% discount rate (which is generous) 10 years that means the EV can cost $7500 more up front and you'll break even. The EV will also be more fun to drive and generally less hassle, assuming you have a place to charge at home.

      Pretty damn dumb if you ask me, for the privilege you cannot even drive the damn thing long distances.

      Sure you can. For practical long-distance driving you need a battery that can take you about 200 miles, and you need a good fast-charging network. At present you have to have a Tesla because only Tesla has the Supercharger network. I've driven my Model S (60 kWh battery, 200-mile range, purchased used for $40K, w/35K miles on it) on several long trips and it works quite well. It also looks beautiful and drives like a dream. I am keeping my eye out for a good deal on one with a 85 or 90 kWh battery, mostly because a 200-mile range means increasing the journey time by about 25%, while a 300-mile range wouldn't generally increase travel time at all, at least for my style of long-distance driving (I prefer to stop and eat when hungry, etc.).

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    22. Re:Reasons by DogDude · · Score: 1

      A. We give massive subsidies to oil companies.

      B. The use of fossil is not good for humans.

      You are incredibly short sighted (or willfully ignorant) if you don't understand this.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    23. Re:Reasons by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps he meant that the "FASTEST* EV you can buy is the iPace, which would also be a false claim.

      Just ignore him. He always trolls articles on EVs, renewable energy, etc..

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    24. Re:Reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here are the high points of the math: My EV costs me $0.01 per mile in electricity.

      Here are the higher points of the math: Your EV costs you $0.03 per mile in "fuel" one month ago.
      Amazing how were you able to chop your electricity costs by 67% in one month swillden...what's your secret?

    25. Re:Reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people will buy cars no matter what. Stick-and-carroting the ones that are better and worse for the environmemt is obviously helping the enviroment.
      Of course, there are other things that can also be incentivised. But what makes you think Norway are not doing that as well?

    26. Re:Reasons by shilly · · Score: 1

      Have you really never heard of the concept of not letting the best be the enemy of the good? There is a scale of environmental damage for transport that runs the gamut from walking to Ferraris (and beyond -- this is just an illustrative example, in case you're prone to being literal). EVs are further towards walking than are ICEs.

    27. Re:Reasons by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Wait for the gov to go full East Germany

      You're always banging on about this. So far the only thig that actually happened is East Germany colappsed and became like West Germany.

      Nordic central planning at its best.

      I hate the way those guys are so rich and happy. Must be the government's fault. Fuck the government I don't want to be rich or happy.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    28. Re:Reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just ignore him. He always trolls articles on EVs, renewable energy, etc..

      If the trolling is specific to certain subjects it is more likely that he is a shill rather than a troll.

    29. Re:Reasons by amorsen · · Score: 1

      You can have your own opinions, you can't have your own facts.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    30. Re:Reasons by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      In normal rich and happy nations people can enjoy the freedom to find a car they want. Not what the gov suggests with a new tax rate.
      People can enjoy old and new cars. Electric, SUV, trucks.
      The freedom to buy any regular car they want.
      Not having to consider the tax rate and getting priced by the gov into selecting from a few new approved electric cars.

      Who wants a bureaucrat to list a few approved electric cars?

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    31. Re:Reasons by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      In normal rich and happy nations people can enjoy the freedom to find a car they want.

      Stop simply making shit up to support your point. In Norway you're not restricted from buying fossil fuel vehicles.

      Not what the gov suggests with a new tax rate.

      That's the opposite of true.

      People can enjoy old and new cars. Electric, SUV, trucks.

      Nice use of "weasel words", "enjoy". In Norway you can still buy and run old cars as well as new ones. Claims to the contrary are lies.

      The freedom to buy any regular car they want.

      Like you can in Norway.

      Not having to consider the tax rate and getting priced by the gov into selecting from a few new approved electric cars.

      Ah now we get to the heart of it. You don't like taxes. I suspect however you're not prepared to accept partial liability for all the deaths caused by particulates emitted by fossil fuel cars.

      In other words you're the worst kind of socialist: you never want to give up your hard earned dollars to support a person but you want all of them to hand over heaps of cash to take on your risks.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    32. Re:Reasons by swillden · · Score: 1

      Here are the high points of the math: My EV costs me $0.01 per mile in electricity.

      Here are the higher points of the math: Your EV costs you $0.03 per mile in "fuel" one month ago. Amazing how were you able to chop your electricity costs by 67% in one month swillden...what's your secret?

      Hmm. Looks like I made a mistake in that previous post. Adjust my numbers in that post downward accordingly.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    33. Re:Reasons by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The FASTEST selling EV was the iPace.

      Repeating stupidities doesn't make them any more factual or any less stupid.

    34. Re:Reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A gar car being replaced with an EV makes less CO2 emissions regardless of whether or not the owner is rich. Allowing the rich to be eligible instead of arbitrarily excluding them means that more people will take advantage of the incentive, meaning the overall costs of the vehicles will come down faster. This is better for everyone, rich or poor.

    35. Re:Reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen you make this claim a few times on this page. Where does it come from? The only thing I could find was this:

      https://seekingalpha.com/article/4212162-jaguar-pace-outsells-tesla-s-x-combined-40-percent-norway

      But that only applies for a very short window. Are you extrapolating from that? The following link has a chart showing more Leaf sales in November than iPace sales all year (and the VW e-Golf being pretty close!)

      http://ev-sales.blogspot.com/2018/12/norway-november-2018.html

    36. Re:Reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We don't give any subsidies to oil companies. In fact, they are taxed rather heavily. The bulk of oil profits go to goverments.

    37. Re:Reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Golf is the market leader in the most competitive segment. It is nearly impossible to make more than a few hunder Euros on a car in this segment, unless it happens to be a very expensive (and thus rare) trim. Similar cars aren't much cheaper and several of those are sold at a loss.

    38. Re:Reasons by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Re "you're not restricted from buying fossil fuel vehicles."
      The new tax rate will make that electric car the only option for most people looking to buy a new car.
      Re "That's the opposite of true."
      The tax exists to change the way people buy a new car, forcing them to buy electric.
      Like you can in Norway.
      From a selection of new electric cars. Unless a person can afford to pay the full tax rate.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    39. Re:Reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm. Looks like I made A mistake in that previous post

      Well except you made the exact same mistake at least TWICE.
      Let's say your fingers slipped typing $0.03 instead of your supposed intended $0.01 submitting your posting.
      However, you also had to have made exactly the same mistake in the actual calculation (adding a "3" instead of your supposed intended "1") to arrive at your "28(25+"3") cents cost-per -mile".
      Besides, $0.01 per mile would require electricity cost at ~$0.04/kWh. You're paying $0.10/kWh in Utah.
      Looks like your "mistake" of $$0.03/mile is much closer to actual costs than your now brand new $0.01/mile.

    40. Re:Reasons by swillden · · Score: 1

      I pay $0.034/kWh off-peak.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    41. Re:Reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I pay $0.034/kWh off-peak.

      pssst swillden...I suggest you give "Con Rocky" a call first thing in the morning.

    42. Re:Reasons by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      No that's not true. Most peple will probably go for electric because it will be cheaper and they don't have an inane and inexplicable attachment t ofossil fuel vehicles.

      You also ignored my comment about how not tacing them simply socialises the damage fossil fuel vehicles cause rather than forcing the owners to pay up front. Classic "libertarian" thinking: anything that stops you harming others is too restricting on your freedoms.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
  4. Funny world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its nice that they have so much money from selling oil that they can afford so many shiny new electric cars.

    1. Re:Funny world by alvinrod · · Score: 2

      The regular folks don't see any of that money and until recently, the government wasn't even spending any of it. The vast majority of what they take in for any given year ends up getting banked away into an investment fund (earning even more money) and as a result they've got a considerable nest egg.

      The reason for this is that Norway has all kinds of taxes, fees, etc. related to cars, almost all of which have been waved or heavily reduced for electric vehicles. It isn't that it's rich people who can afford shiny new electric cars are suddenly buying them, it's that Norway has made cars hideously expensive for most people, but have removed those expenses if you buy an electric car. I don't know if they changed it at all, but previously they had no VAT on electric vehicles among other more environmentally friendly cars. That's a huge deal.

      The lesson is that if you don't tax the ever living hell out of something, people are more likely to buy that thing than the competing alternatives.

    2. Re:Funny world by Kjella · · Score: 2

      The regular folks don't see any of that money and until recently, the government wasn't even spending any of it. The vast majority of what they take in for any given year ends up getting banked away into an investment fund (earning even more money) and as a result they've got a considerable nest egg.

      That's very much not true, up until recently the oil income was greater than the deficit meaning we were both saving compound interest and adding fresh money but without any oil income we'd have a big deficit. Last year we had 183 bNOK in net oil income, 214 bNOK in return on our oil fund and had a 255 bNOK deficit without the oil. So the result is our fund grew by 140 bNOK, but almost 20% of our 1253 bNOK budget came from oil. If the oil industry completely shut down today we'd already be losing money despite the nest egg. And they do expect the workforce to non-workforce balance to get worse...

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  5. Norway is hydro powered. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In 2014 95% of all energy produced was hydroelectric. So it's not like every country can just follow Norway's example.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electricity_sector_in_Norway

    1. Re:Norway is hydro powered. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh you're right, I keep forgetting that unless you have massive hydro, you can't produce enough renewable electricity to power electric vehicles! Even though solar panels are well under $1 per watt, who can be bothered to set up a solar panel car port when all I want to do is play Candy Crush all day?

  6. For certain values of "anywhere". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    viable anywhere

    Anywhere that has the geography to supply 95% of the nation's electricity from hydroelectric dams.

    1. Re:For certain values of "anywhere". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That also applies to most of Canada, AFAIK.

    2. Re:For certain values of "anywhere". by fluffernutter · · Score: 2

      Canada is a wee bit bigger than Norway, however. We have a shitload of empty space an EV needs to take you through in a way that is dependable because getting stuck in one of those empty spaces when it is -30C can be a bitch. Well, people have died. You think there is cellphone coverage everywhere? Think again. Welcome to Canada.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    3. Re:For certain values of "anywhere". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do most Canadians usually drive all over their country? Most Norwegians don't - which is why electric cars work so well for us. The country is 1780 km long, not a distance you want to cover in an electric car.

    4. Re:For certain values of "anywhere". by fluffernutter · · Score: 2

      Many Canadians drive well into the wilderness to go to the cottage or go camping. A lot of times that is in the winter. There are a lot of road trips to national parks, etc.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    5. Re:For certain values of "anywhere". by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Many Canadians have two vehicles. An electric is an excellent 2nd vehicle, wish I could get the wife one. It would get a lot of use and we'd still have the truck for longer trips, including going into the bush and even getting into town when there's been a dump of snow.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    6. Re:For certain values of "anywhere". by hazardPPP · · Score: 1

      Norway is also sparsely populated. Also, the vast majority of Canadians do not spend a lot of time driving through empty spaces, most of them live in urban and suburban areas (more than 80% live in metropolitan areas, and more than a third live in the Toronto, Montreal, or Vancouver areas), and they usually drive a few km to work, shop, go out, etc.

    7. Re:For certain values of "anywhere". by hazardPPP · · Score: 1

      Many Canadians drive well into the wilderness to go to the cottage or go camping. A lot of times that is in the winter. There are a lot of road trips to national parks, etc.

      You would have to define what you mean by "many", since as a Canadian I would dispute that "many drive well into the wilderness" (it's certainly very far from "most"). By my experience, most people in the GTA drive less than 2-3 hrs (around 300 km) when they go camping, to the cottage or wherever (Muskoka does not fit the description of "well into the wilderness", I'm sorry).

      Norwegians are also very outdoorsy people, my impression is that the average Norwegian is actually outdoorsier than the average Canadian.

    8. Re:For certain values of "anywhere". by froggyjojodaddy · · Score: 1

      Canadian here. I just spent the last 5 mins thinking of all the people that I know and how many of them have a single car. And I couldn't come up with one. I have friends and colleagues who live in downtown Toronto and they have two cars. My elderly in-laws have two cars. We have three cars, all of which serve different purposes. Truck for hauling large loads (we have a few acres and like to do gardening), Hybrid PHEV for daily commute to/from work, convertible for the summer).

      Even Muskoka has a supercharger station, close to Bracebridge which should qualify as "the middle of nowhere". Parts of Muskoka region are well developed, but there are huge parts of it that are not. Since I live in KW, it does take me around 3 hours to get to the cabin and it's definitely in the wilderness. No cell signal for miles, no roads, no electricity.

    9. Re:For certain values of "anywhere". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many Canadians drive well into the wilderness to go to the cottage or go camping. A lot of times that is in the winter. There are a lot of road trips to national parks, etc.

      Optimize for the common case: buy an EV / hybrid for your commute, and rent an ICE vehicle for those hinterland trips.

      You're commuting >200 days of the year, and driving for a camping trip or vacation <10.

    10. Re: For certain values of "anywhere". by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      except most people pay no more than $5k for a designated second vehicle

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    11. Re: For certain values of "anywhere". by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      how many people do you know that have a $30k plus second vehicle?

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    12. Re: For certain values of "anywhere". by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      sure, places have charging stations. get stuck behind a couple people behind one and there goes your schedule for the entire day.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    13. Re: For certain values of "anywhere". by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Interesting statistic. Probably depends on what that second vehicle is used for with more spent when a job depends on it.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    14. Re: For certain values of "anywhere". by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Taxes in my country only allow business vehicles to be used as a business vehicle. Sure people might buy a bit more expensive vehicle because their personal vehicle can be 10-20% written against business taxes but we're not getting from $5k to $30k here.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    15. Re:For certain values of "anywhere". by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      I own a vehicle specifically because I don't want to negotiate and shop every time I need to travel. I especially hate dealing with rental companies. Besides, I need every cent that I save on gas to make the EV worthwhile.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    16. Re: For certain values of "anywhere". by dryeo · · Score: 1

      I was talking about commuting vehicle and the need to get to work reliably

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    17. Re: For certain values of "anywhere". by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      If you're just commuting a short distance, you can get by with a less reliable (older) gasoline car. If your car breaks down and there is a tow truck $50 away then it's a PITA but hardly worthwhile the money it costs for a bulletproof car. The sharpest demand is for the long road trips. I have a lot of medical history in my family. Personally, I want to know I can drive to the nearest large city in a fairly bad storm in the case of an emergency. That means 3 hours in fairly bad east-coast weather. Granted, many people around here don't need to be quite so cautious but they still need to be self-sufficient. Communiting for us isn't just a bunch of dry pavement.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    18. Re: For certain values of "anywhere". by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      I forgot to add, that is the job for the vehicle I pay $30K plus for. The other one is easy to buy.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    19. Re:For certain values of "anywhere". by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Well if they want to give up their independence from an EV charge then fine. Maybe I just happen to know a lot of people who go camping in the middle of nowhere.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    20. Re:For certain values of "anywhere". by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Canadian here... We have three cars, all of which serve different purposes. Truck for hauling large loads (we have a few acres and like to do gardening), Hybrid PHEV for daily commute to/from work, convertible for the summer).

      Is that last bit a joke? Like the Swiss Navy, or something?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    21. Re:For certain values of "anywhere". by hazardPPP · · Score: 1

      Is that last bit a joke? Like the Swiss Navy, or something?

      Note: Canada has a summer. In places where people actually live (like southern Ontario and southern Quebec), it gets significantly hotter in the summer than in many other places with mild climates and mild winters (like the UK or Germany for example).

    22. Re: For certain values of "anywhere". by hazardPPP · · Score: 1

      sure, places have charging stations. get stuck behind a couple people behind one and there goes your schedule for the entire day.

      I'm sure than in 1905 there were lots of people saying "sure places have gas stations. Get stuck behind a couple people behind one and there goes your schedule for the entire day. I can just zoom by on my horse and there's lots of places I can feed it quickly..."

      Yes, we are in the early days of EV adoption. Yes, there is not enough infrastructure everywhere yet. This will change. It will change more quickly than most people think.

    23. Re:For certain values of "anywhere". by hazardPPP · · Score: 1

      I know a lot of people in Toronto with zero cars. Mostly those living downtown, or in the more traditional urban areas close to it. I think it's a generational thing. Younger folks are less likely to have a car (and be members of zipcar or some such car-sharing service) even if they grew up in the suburbs in families owning 2-3 vehicles. Their parents might still have two cars making it easy for them to ocassionally borrow one when needed for an out-of-town trip, which further reduces their incentive to buy their own vehicle.

    24. Re:For certain values of "anywhere". by froggyjojodaddy · · Score: 1

      lol yup. in KW region, we regularly get 30C+ summer days, the 25C+ weather even extended well into Autumn/Fall in 2018..

    25. Re: For certain values of "anywhere". by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      The change that needs to happen is to be able to charge a battery as fast as filling the gas tank.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    26. Re: For certain values of "anywhere". by hazardPPP · · Score: 1

      The change that needs to happen is to be able to charge a battery as fast as filling the gas tank.

      Yes and no.

      Sure, it would be great to be able to charge an EV to a comparable stored energy level in the same time it now takes to fill up $25 worth of gasoline. It is however not necessary.

      The only place where I can get fuel for an ICE vehicle is at a station with a pump. An EV I can charge overnight in my garage (or whenever I am home). I can plug in away from home in a parking lot (at the office, the mall, the restaurant, a hotel, etc.). Personal cars are parked most of the day, and if you could charge everywhere where you park, slow charging is acceptable. At home this is already available basically for all house owners. Many apartment buildings now have chargers too. There are many public ones at or near office buildings, shopping and entertainment venues, etc. Since electricity is already routed basically everywhere, it's easier to eventually have a (slow) charger at every corner than to have a liquid fuel pump at every corner.

      This reduces the need for quick charges for most people. Especially when coupled with the growth in battery capacity in the average EV. The only time one would need a quick charge is for some reason one forgot or was not able to charge at the home / office / wherever, or when on a long (intercity, cross-country) trip. In that case, doing a full charge (0 - 100%) in 15-30 minutes is acceptable. Yes it's longer than filling up with gas (which is 5-6 minutes tops, when you have a large empty tank) but it would happen a lot less often. In total, you'd spending a lot less time at a station - and when this is part of a long trip, you would take longer breaks anyway. If I'm doing Toronto - Montreal, I don't care if I spent 5 mins to fill up on gas and then 25 minutes having a snack and a coffee at the station's bar/store, or if the car is charging for 30 minutes while I have my break with snack & coffee. There would just have to be enough charging stations so you don't waste too much time waiting in line.

    27. Re: For certain values of "anywhere". by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      "for most people" being the key word. And even thought people don't really know they will never run into a situation where they will need to charge on the road.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  7. Norway has almost as many people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    as Minnesota.

    1. Re:Norway has almost as many people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And about half the population of Los Angeles County, in a place about the size of Montana.

    2. Re:Norway has almost as many people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So?

    3. Re:Norway has almost as many people by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      And about half the population of Los Angeles County, in a place about the size of Montana.

      As we're talking about Europe, the accepted standard of measurement is " an area the size of Wales".

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  8. Smaller countries work better with EV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I do think the US is less workable in some areas for all EV then say a small country like Norway. Considering Norway is about the size of Arizona.

    1. Re:Smaller countries work better with EV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...which is still very large. Norway is by no means a small country.

    2. Re:Smaller countries work better with EV by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      There are 67 countries that are larger, and 117 with more people. Norway is a mid-sized country with a small population - at best. It's close to the size of California, with about 25% the population of the Los Angeles metro area. Small and lightly populated.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    3. Re:Smaller countries work better with EV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The area is "small", but it's very long.

    4. Re: Smaller countries work better with EV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So your point is that even larger countries exist? That doesn't stop Norway from being absolutely huge.

  9. Target of 100% may be impossible by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    “Strictly speaking I don’t think it’s possible, primarily because too many people don’t have a private parking space and won’t want to buy a plug-in car if they can’t establish a charging point at home,” ITE economist Lasse Fridstroem said.

    So either they force all landlords/etc in the country to install at least one charging point per apartment/tenant or they have to drop their 100% target.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
    1. Re:Target of 100% may be impossible by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Or have faith that the free market will take care of things. "This apartment looks great, I love the location, but does it have enough EV charging points? No? Ok, thanks for your time."

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    2. Re:Target of 100% may be impossible by DogDude · · Score: 1

      There'll be charging stations at parking meters and street lights in modern countries in the next few decades. Private businesses of all kinds are going to eventually pet them in everywhere. It's a very temporary problem.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    3. Re:Target of 100% may be impossible by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      The tax rate on non electric will make buying and using non electric transport a luxury.
      Got a private track? Drive a non electric car around that and then transport it back on an electric truck.
      Pay the car tax? Soon the car tax will be replaced with a car ban.

      100% of the cars allowed on roads by the government will be electric.
      Thats the power of a government to shape transport to get that needed 100%.
      Then start to "inspect" private roads and ensure all cars used are "safe", registered and paying another new tax.
      Slowly the car becomes part of a static art collection due to gov regulations and new taxation.
      Classic cars can always be converted to electric... with a gov approved speaker system to give that old car sound.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    4. Re:Target of 100% may be impossible by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Sure, because there are apartment blocks anywhere that have trouble finding tenants?

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    5. Re:Target of 100% may be impossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Private companies are not going to pay for people to fill up their cars. If Wal-Mart has free chargers for the Tesla guys, they should have free gas and diesel for everyone else. The chargers are a nice thing, but once EVs start getting more common, they will be going away.

    6. Re:Target of 100% may be impossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who said those chargers will be free? Tesla Superchargers are no longer free anymore. The same applies to the rest of charging network. But there is one thing where governments can put the pressure - standardize sockets and protocols to be sure that you can charge EV at any charging station, the same you can fill your ICEV at any petrol station (unless you burn some exotic fuel).

    7. Re:Target of 100% may be impossible by terrycarlino · · Score: 1

      Plenty of apartments around here that have EV charging points. Most people don't mind the $500-$1000 a month premium they have to pay to get them;(. Still at least you won't find any section 8 renters or kids there. They are pet friendly

    8. Re:Target of 100% may be impossible by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      And the ICE vehicle will go the way of the Hansom cab and horse drawn cart. Big deal.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  10. People in Norway do not stay just in Norway... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1, Informative

    Norway generates about 90% of it's electrical power via Hydro.

    Irrelevant as people people generally do not think (or care) about where power comes from.

    That, and the fact the country could fit into Texas twice

    That's a really limited view of how people in Europe live. Sure they country they live in may be tiny, but that just means you can drive to a lot more countries. Don't you think that a lot of people in Norway drive to at least Sweden and Denmark?

    Also, Norway is a lot bigger than you think.

    you have the perfect place for electric cars.

    Certainly not in terms of climate.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:People in Norway do not stay just in Norway... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It actually is relevant because if you live in a backwards shithole like West Virginia or Utah that gets a lot of coal power, it makes less sense because it is way more expensive and dirtier then the worst car.

      numbnuts

    2. Re:People in Norway do not stay just in Norway... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh look an ambassador for adoption of EV vehicle's who's also a complete faggot and asshole. What a surprise.

    3. Re:People in Norway do not stay just in Norway... by swillden · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It actually is relevant because if you live in a backwards shithole like West Virginia or Utah that gets a lot of coal power, it makes less sense because it is way more expensive and dirtier then the worst car.

      Actually, coal-powered EVs are cheaper to power and cleaner than the best ICEVs, even hybrids. Coal is generally dirtier than gasoline or diesel, but the dramatically higher efficiencies available in a large, high-temperature power plant vs a small, low-temperature engine more than make up the difference.

      I live in Utah, BTW. And drive an EV. Last month I drove 2024 miles, and spent $24.09 on charging (I have a meter on my home EV charger, which is the only place I charge). If I were driving a gasoline car that gets 35 mpg, at $2.50 per gallon that would cost me $142.50 in fuel. Tell me again which is more expensive?

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    4. Re:People in Norway do not stay just in Norway... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And, what is the amortized cost of your EV over its expected lifetime, with and without any financing required to enable the purchase?

    5. Re:People in Norway do not stay just in Norway... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shhhh he has not figured out he is paying up front for his fuel with interest, maths is hard shit for some people.

    6. Re:People in Norway do not stay just in Norway... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your numbers are bullshit swillden.

      Electric cars get about 30 kWh/100miles.
      2024 miles takes about 600 kWh.
      $24.09 for 600 kWh = $0.04 kWh, when the average price for electricity in America is ~$0.10/kWh
      You're paying at least $50/month charging your electric car.

    7. Re: People in Norway do not stay just in Norway... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People don't drive around in norway, or anywhere else. The mountains and water make any kind of long distance travel on roads pretty tedious.

      The typical Norwegian is pretty well off and can afford a new electric car for inner city driving (it's cold, so going by bike not fun) and to make the travel to his boat or plane more nice.

      Electric cars there solve something above first world problems. Not really comparable to mere mortals in other less developed countries.

    8. Re:People in Norway do not stay just in Norway... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On top of that, you’re paying interest on the loan need to buy the over priced golf cart in the first place. In addition the charger uses up electricity even when it’s not charging.

    9. Re:People in Norway do not stay just in Norway... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, coal-powered EVs are cheaper to power and cleaner than the best ICEVs, even hybrids. Coal is generally dirtier than gasoline or diesel, but the dramatically higher efficiencies available in a large, high-temperature power plant vs a small, low-temperature engine more than make up the difference.

      Could you cite a source for this? It seems logical to conclude this but I'd like a reputable source on this for giving to others.

    10. Re:People in Norway do not stay just in Norway... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good that it's cheap there. Triple that price in Ontario. I got a 60 mpg car because it costs the exact same to drive as a Tesla, except my car only cost $10k brand new.

    11. Re: People in Norway do not stay just in Norway... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The current media wants to blame Ford for tinkering with Hydro despite the fact that purely political meddling in Hydro has been going on for decades.

      Manitoba and Quebec both have 95% renewable electricity generation and super low rates, but Maguinty and Wynne just had to have sexy solar and wind, and in so doing doubled hydro costs in exchange for 10% renewables. Then to add injury they started to tax carbon since everyone was moving to fossil fuels because they couldn't afford to hear their homes with Hydro.

    12. Re:People in Norway do not stay just in Norway... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Coal power as such may be cleaner that ICEV, but that is not the point. Creating electric cars is more carbon heavy stuff than creting old fashioned car. All thos rare earth minerals that need to be digged etc. It's the low emissions from the EV use that will over the time offset the high manufactoring emissions. If the electricity is generated via dirty methods, such as coal plants, then the environmental viability of electric car is not that clear cut case

    13. Re:People in Norway do not stay just in Norway... by swillden · · Score: 1

      Creating electric cars is more carbon heavy stuff than creting old fashioned car. All thos rare earth minerals that need to be digged etc.

      Cite?

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    14. Re:People in Norway do not stay just in Norway... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      And even if it wasn't cleaner the coal power station's tailpipe isn't in the middle of a giant population centre. Even if climate change were not a thing I'd be a huge advocate of EV just so every city did not smell like diesel and wouldn't be full of soot.

    15. Re:People in Norway do not stay just in Norway... by swillden · · Score: 2

      Your numbers are bullshit swillden.

      Electric cars get about 30 kWh/100miles. 2024 miles takes about 600 kWh. $24.09 for 600 kWh = $0.04 kWh, when the average price for electricity in America is ~$0.10/kWh You're paying at least $50/month charging your electric car.

      I pay $0.034/kWh to charge my cars. I'm on a time-of-use plan which charges $0.034/kWh off-peak and $0.34/kWh on-peak. My chargers (I have two, for two cars) are configured to charge only during off-peak times.

      As an aside, switching to the time-of-use plan has saved me a lot on AC, too. I configure my smart thermostat to cool the house to 68F an hour before peak starts (3 PM) and then change the set point to 78F. The AC rarely runs again before 8PM when peak ends. This has reduced my cooling bills by about 30%.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    16. Re:People in Norway do not stay just in Norway... by swillden · · Score: 1

      On top of that, you’re paying interest on the loan need to buy the over priced golf cart in the first place.

      Actually, I bought my cars with cash; the only thing I finance is my home. But I have run the numbers with a reasonable discount rate which would cover inflation loss and/or loan servicing in another post, and I also included those considerations in my calculations before buying.

      In addition the charger uses up electricity even when it’s not charging.

      Which is included in the metering I mentioned. Also, the consumption is trivial; pennies per month at most.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    17. Re:People in Norway do not stay just in Norway... by swillden · · Score: 1

      Actually, I bought my cars with cash; the only thing I finance is my home.

      Actually, this isn't quite accurate, because I did lease for several years. I leased a 2011 Leaf in 2012, and then turned it in and leased a 2013 Leaf in 2014. I leased rather than buying because I knew that technology was changing and prices dropping rapidly. In 2017 when the (extended) lease ended, I paid $6000 cash to buy the car off lease (Nissan had estimated the end-of-lease value at $21K. Oops for them.), so my total cost was about $15K including all lease payments and the buyout.

      I suppose I also financed most of the Tesla I bought in 2018, borrowing my 401K, though I'm paying interest to myself, so that's really more of opportunity cost (the borrowed money doesn't generate returns, though since my 2018 returns were net negative, I guess I "won" there). I also put $2500 of the Tesla on a credit card, but I pay the card off every month so I incur no interest charges... and get a 1% kickback, which I why I used the card for as much as the dealership would let me. I'd have loved it if they let me put the entire cost on the card :-)

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    18. Re:People in Norway do not stay just in Norway... by terrycarlino · · Score: 1

      Norway may be bigger than you think, but that does not translate to commute distance. Checking with timeanddate.com shows that with the exception of Tromso and Svalbard every city in Norway listed is within 150 miles of Oslo.

      For me the question isn't how much do I commute every day, but how many times a month/year do I want to travel beyond that distance. More, how many times a week/month/year do I want to travel beyond the typical EV range? If its once or twice a year, sure rent a vehicle those one or two times a year. If It's something I do every other weekend an EV is not a good choice.

      For example a student who goes home on weekends and at every semester break probably can't get by with an EV if they go to school >300 miles from home. Someone who spends a good deal of their leisure time hiking far from the city probably can't get by with a EV. Someone who spends their weekends visiting other towns, cities and the countryside can't get by with an EV.

      A friend I have who is European I think put it best:The difference between an American and a European is that an American thinks 200 years is a long time and a European thinks 200 miles is a long way.

      When I was stationed in California as a young man I owned a motorcycle. I typically put 300 miles a day on my bike when I had the day off. Later in my career I was stationed in Baltimore but living in Hampton Roads. A 220 mile commute every weekend. Would an EV have made it? Possibly, but I had better not plan on using my vehicle again that night.

      Until ranges get up to 400 mile range of an IC engine, with the 1-2 minute recharge time of a gas fill-up EVs will remain niche cars for people who live in cities and seldom travel.

    19. Re:People in Norway do not stay just in Norway... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I pay $0.034/kWh to charge my cars.

      That's still bullshit swillden.
      You said you live in Utah earlier, Rocky Mountain Power charges you ~$0.10/kWh off-peak.
      And off-peak discount is only available during the summer months (May-September).
      You have zero discounts during winter.

    20. Re:People in Norway do not stay just in Norway... by swillden · · Score: 1

      I pay $0.034/kWh to charge my cars.

      That's still bullshit swillden. You said you live in Utah earlier, Rocky Mountain Power charges you ~$0.10/kWh off-peak. And off-peak discount is only available during the summer months (May-September). You have zero discounts during winter.

      Nope.

      Rate Option 2:
      34.3753 per kWh for all On-Peak kWh
      3.4003 per kWh for all Off-Peak kWh

      TIME PERIODS:
      On-Peak: October through April inclusive
      8:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m., and 3:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m., Monday thru Friday, except holidays.
      May through September inclusive
      3:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m., Monday thru Friday, except holidays.
      Off-Peak: All other times.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    21. Re:People in Norway do not stay just in Norway... by swillden · · Score: 1

      For completeness, here's the holiday listing:

      Holidays include only New Year's Day, President's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Pioneer Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, and Christmas Day. When a holiday falls on a Saturday or Sunday, the Friday before the holiday (if the holiday falls on a Saturday) or the Monday following the holiday (if the holiday falls on a Sunday) will be considered a holiday and consequently Off-Peak.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    22. Re:People in Norway do not stay just in Norway... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rate Option 2:
              34.3753 per kWh for all On-Peak kWh
              3.4003 per kWh for all Off-Peak kWh

      TIME PERIODS:
              On-Peak: October through April inclusive
              8:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m., and 3:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m., Monday thru Friday, except holidays.
              May through September inclusive
              3:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m., Monday thru Friday, except holidays.
              Off-Peak: All other times.

      LOL swillden, I see why you're so reluctant to provide citations for your $0.034/kWh...it's a fucking pilot trial project from Rocky Mountain Power...so not generally available, and no guarantee it will be around next year or whenever Rocky decides the trial is over.
      The average joe pays $0.10/kWh as previously stated.

      What's even more LOL, you're fucking paying $0.34/kWh during the most in demand time slot of 1500-2000 (and 0800-1000 Oct-Apr).
      You're paying more than double, the average user during peak demand, and since the average household uses about 20 kWh per day (and in your case, you're using an additional 20 kWh per day driving your ~70 miles a day), you would have saved money by not getting conned by "Con Rocky" with fancy numbers that fucked up your bird brain for numbers.
      I suggest you get off the "Con Rocky" pilot program ASAP to not look more stupid (unless of course you're some kind of super saver who delays dinner till after 8PM etc...).

    23. Re:People in Norway do not stay just in Norway... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are no cars sold in Canada that get 60mpg. Let me guess, you bought a hybrid. mpge =/= mpg.

    24. Re:People in Norway do not stay just in Norway... by swillden · · Score: 1

      Yes, I'm on a three-year pilot program. So what?

      You're paying more than double, the average user during peak demand, and since the average household uses about 20 kWh per day (and in your case, you're using an additional 20 kWh per day driving your ~70 miles a day), you would have saved money by not getting conned by "Con Rocky" with fancy numbers that fucked up your bird brain for numbers.

      Sigh. I really don't know why I'm bothering with this... you aren't bothering to do the math, but you're assuming -- completely unreasonably -- that I haven't/don't, and that I don't pay any attention to my overall power bills. But, I'll respond one last time, then I'm out.

      I charge only off-peak, so I only pay the $0.034 rate for car charging. I built a pair of OpenEVSE chargers and modified the software to support my time-of-use plan, as well as to load-balance since both are connected to a single 50A circuit.

      As for the rest of the house, if you bother to do the math you'll see that constant loads are actually slightly cheaper with TOU vs flat rate (actually, tiered) during the summer (constant-load daily average is $0.0975), and only slightly more during the winter (constant-load daily average is $0.1232). Further, with a well-crafted summer schedule for my smart thermostat, I get massive savings on AC by cooling the house to 68 just before 3 PM, then changing the set point to 78 until 8 PM. My summertime electric bills dropped significantly from that. About a third. I'm building a system to passively cool the house at night in the summer, and I expect an even larger savings from that when I get it fully operational.

      Cooking, etc., doesn't really use much power except when we have lots of extended family over, but that's typically on weekends or holidays anyway, when it's off-peak all day. The washing machine and dryer don't draw much (dryer is natgas). I was quite concerned about the cost of running my wife's enormous Christmas lights display at $0.34/kWh, since she wants to turn them on at 5 PM, so I replaced most of the lights with LEDs, and the result is that the whole thing only draws about 400 W. That's $0.45 per day, so about $20 for the season, which is $10 more than it would cost to run the LEDs on the standard rate plan. Per year. And I was going to do the LED changeover anyway. That usage will go up some more when I add the floods for the half life-size nativity (I acquired the last of the figures in the after-Christmas sales and I'm now building a stable, 10'x6'x4', with a lifting hook so I can move it around with the tractor).

      The humidifier is a power hog, drawing almost 3 kW. So I have my smart thermostat set to run it only during off-peak times, and obviously only in the winter. The steam generator in the steam shower is a massive power draw at 9 kW, but it typically only gets used early in the morning and late at night anyway. Same for the tub heater and jets. I do actively discourage my family from using those during peak hours, though I don't tell them not to.

      Lights, computers, TVs... they don't have much of an impact, and the computers (other than my workstation) and TVs don't usually get powered up until about 7 PM and are in use until 11 or so (when the Wifi turns off for the kids), and 1 * 0.34 + 3 * 0.034 = .44 = 4 * .11, so that's a wash. The fact that it really is a wash is quite apparent in the total power bills.

      Anyway, the bottom line is that I monitor the hell out of all of this (I have ammeters installed on every circuit in the house), and I can tell you for certain that the net effect of the TOU plan has been beneficial, even without considering EV charging savings. Obviously it's beneficial in large part because I've taken steps to reduce power usage during peak times, but that's the whole point of TOU, isn't it?

      But the fact is that I came out considerably ahead on "fuel" and maintenance costs by switching to EVs

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    25. Re:People in Norway do not stay just in Norway... by BostonPilot · · Score: 1

      Until ranges get up to 400 mile range of an IC engine, with the 1-2 minute recharge time of a gas fill-up EVs will remain niche cars for people who live in cities and seldom travel.

      Ranges probably won't ever get to 400 miles except maybe vehicles like pickups that may have extra large batteries for towing... but for a regular passenger car 300 miles is more than enough almost everywhere in the US as long as you have access to DC fast charging (like Tesla's SuperCharger network). I've yet to jump in my Model 3 and enter a destination that it can't get me to.

      Adding the weight of a bigger battery to go a distance that you almost never go just makes the vehicle inefficient for most of it's use. I got the Long Range battery for my Model 3 because it was the only choice, and because I live in Boston where the cold winter weather can have an impact on range, but so far I've never had a problem with range. Frankly, I'd consider getting a smaller battery next time because I so seldom use the range I have now...

      I had a day a couple months ago where I had to drive up to New Hampshire, then down south of Boston, then out to Amherst (central MA) and back... That was 5 1/2 hours of driving that day... (a little over 300 miles). I spent 15 minutes at a Supercharger out near Amherst, and that was it. Really, to stop for 15 minutes over 5 1/2 hours of driving was nothing...

      I have to travel from Boston to Atlanta GA this month and I considered driving the Tesla there just to experience a long distance trip. It's 1,088 miles, about 19 hours of driving. I'd spend 2.5 hours charging along the way which might sound like a lot, but I'd want to stop a few times for bathroom breaks, and to grab a bite to eat, so the charging probably adds about 1 hour to the trip, compared to taking an ICE car.

    26. Re:People in Norway do not stay just in Norway... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I'm on a three-year pilot program. So what?

      So you're a fucking idiot?

      You're presenting your edge case of 1000 participants in a pilot program as if it were the norm.
      95% of the EV owners in your state of Utah are paying 3X as much for electricity.

      Beyond the simple mechanics, your fucking pilot program is going to cost the average consumer more for electricity than the traditional rate structure.
      "Con Rocky" even tries to entice the uninitiated by offering assurance that pilot participant charges will cap at 10% above the old baseline costs should the pilot program costs go through the fucking roof.
      The fact that "Con Rocky" is even offering cost protection tells you what "Con Rocky" anticipates the trial is going to screw over a good portion of the trial participants.

      don't usually get powered up until about 7 PM and are in use until 11 or so

      Your family do what everyday until 7PM? Masturbates?
      But seriously, the $0.34/kWh 1500-2000 could work for some people...with the exception of like 90% of the people.

    27. Re:People in Norway do not stay just in Norway... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And even if it wasn't cleaner the coal power station's tailpipe isn't in the middle of a giant population centre

      Most coal power stations are in or near big cities.

      Even if climate change were not a thing I'd be a huge advocate of EV just so every city did not smell like diesel and wouldn't be full of soot.

      Automotive tailpipe emissions only contribute a small fraction of soot in the air these days. It won't change much.

  11. Greenwashing. by thesupraman · · Score: 2

    Yep, huge government subsidies is the reason.
    All in the name of greenwashing of course.
    After all, they are the 3rd largest exporter of natural gas in the world - or perhaps they think that is being used to make magical pixie rainbows?

    1. Re:Greenwashing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, huge government subsidies is the reason.

      Wrong. No subsidies. When I bought my Leaf, didn't government didn't hand me any money at all. So no sponsoring. They sure tax those fossil powered cars though.

      All in the name of greenwashing of course.
      After all, they are the 3rd largest exporter of natural gas in the world - or perhaps they think that is being used to make magical pixie rainbows?

      Norway exports oil and gas. If you don't like that - stop buying & burning it. Possibly a better world - even if we have to go back to eating fish every day . . .

    2. Re:Greenwashing. by dgatwood · · Score: 2

      Even without the huge subsidies, the cost savings are significant over the life of the vehicle, in part because gasoline is taxed so heavily. That's why places with a higher-than-average median income — places where a majority of people can afford new cars (the used EV market is basically nonexistent) — also have much higher EV sales than places with lower median income. Compare that EV sales in the U.S. as a whole (1.2%) to EV sales in San Jose (13%).

      With Europe's exorbitant gas taxes, it is no surprise that the effect of these cost savings is magnified, as the savings themselves are magnified.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  12. A heavy tax by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    will do that.
    The gov is making people have to consider electric by making other transport more expensive.
    Making people change their car buying habits by imposing a new tax rate.
    Electric becomes the only way to buy a new car for a large number of working people.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    1. Re:A heavy tax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jerry Brown, is that you?

      "We know the lion by his claw."

  13. And in other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And in other news, way more than a third of the IT clerk living in San Jose and working in Palo Alto YouTube videos are utter crap!

    I know, I just watched a few. Could I remain affected? Anybody has information on post-traumatic syndrome with regards to such experience?

    1. Re:And in other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See what I mean now? That's why Cdreimer left /. after 20 years and posted 100+ videos in 2018. His trolls are still butthurt that he left them alone with APK.

      The thing to do for him: post more videos :)

  14. Norway bought 1% of new cars as the US did by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a fan of getting off oil in the west, so we can get the f out of the middle east.

    This article would have been more useful to understand a few key points to gauge how likely 1/3 is in the USA or other western countries.

    - what % of household INCOME in Norway was spent on those EVs vs the other 2/3 on ICE cars

    -I kinda get the sense that most of their small population lives in the bottom, more temperate part of Norway. So what's the average commute look like in distance?

    - some other poster went on about tax breaks, free power, parking, etc. Would welcome a reference to gauge how likely those perqs are in the USA

    1. Re:Norway bought 1% of new cars as the US did by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 2

      The EU gets a lot more oil from the Middle East than the US. In fact, our biggest supplier is Iraq, at around 6% of our supplies. We're in the Middle East mainly to provide stability and access to oil for our allies in the EU and Asia - not for our own use.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    2. Re:Norway bought 1% of new cars as the US did by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have no idea what you're blathering about.

    3. Re: Norway bought 1% of new cars as the US did by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are in the Middle East to provide stability, then you are being extremely counterproductive.

  15. Electric does not have to mean chargers by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    So either they force all landlords/etc in the country to install at least one charging point per apartment/tenant or they have to drop their 100% target.

    I agree that is a huge hurdle, however that is one reason hydrogen fuel cells will make for a sizable component of electric cars. Otherwise I agree, apartment dwellers would have a rough time with electric cars even if they all cycled out of a nearby charging station once a week or so.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Electric does not have to mean chargers by terrycarlino · · Score: 1

      So either they force all landlords/etc in the country to install at least one charging point per apartment/tenant or they have to drop their 100% target.

      I think it'll be harder than you think. I live in a HOA townhome community. I have an assigned parking space and am not allowed to install a charging point.

      At least one of my siblings lives in a house in a city which has neither a garage nor a driveway. They park on the streets. Where do you think they're going to charge their potential EV?

    2. Re:Electric does not have to mean chargers by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      That's why I mention fuel cells - with hydrogen you would just fill up at a gas station converted to deliver hydrogen.

      I agree there are a LOT of places you will not be able to install or realistically use chargers. I already see some vandalized.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  16. Re:Conincidently by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, but the big issue is that the other 2/3rds are genetically predisposed to constantly reminding you they are superior because they are Norwegian.

  17. Chevrolet Camaro in Norway is over $156,000! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A Chevrolet Camaro in Norway is over $156,000! Here's a good breakdown of the car taxes in Norway. https://www.reddit.com/r/cars/comments/2iql6h/how_and_why_cars_are_expensive_in_norway_tax/

    The reason there is such a high ratio of electric cars sold is because they tax gasoline cars 100% or more. Anyone who says Norway is a good example of how electric cars are viable in the free market is fooling themselves.

    1. Re:Chevrolet Camaro in Norway is over $156,000! by shilly · · Score: 1

      Who's said anything of the sort? I think people have said that Norway is an excellent example of how a government can use its powers of taxation to change citizen behaviour. Norwegians (and many other Europeans) are by and large pretty comfortable with the notion of regulated markets with taxation used to incentivise particular behaviours, and are pretty uncomfortable with the notion of free markets unfettered by regulation.

  18. I'd like to see ALL the subsidies end, really ... by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    I'm a Tesla owner AND I have PV solar on my roof. But I think it's pretty clear, once you really look at the facts, that all the subsidies aren't too practical.

    We're still early enough in the technology curve for EVs so they cost a premium price to purchase, and have more "hidden costs" that are less often talked about. (EG. You probably need to upgrade the electrical power in your garage so you can charge one of these cars without it taking 2 days to charge back up.) If you compromise on the costs, buying a less capable EV, the trade-off is range and quite likely, battery longevity. (Your Nissan Leaf or Smart4Two electric has no cooling system for the battery pack.) That means, you're talking about a customer-base who can afford to buy one either with or without the tax breaks.

    Meanwhile, the fact that government DOES offer the breaks or subsidies acts as a negative to some of the folks who haven't purchased one yet. They view it as indicating the technology isn't ready for prime-time yet, if it needs those breaks to make good economic sense.

    As per usual, I think government needs to just step aside and stop trying to influence what consumers freely choose to buy with their money. I bought my used Tesla because I thought the performance was unbeatable in the price range (0-60MPH times on these are amazing) and because I liked all the technology in the car. Nobody else gives you an iPad sized LCD display in the dash, from the factory! It also makes your expenses a little more consistent and predictable. The monthly car payment is about 2x what I used to pay, but you know what to expect each month. You don't get dinged here and there, all month long, as you pay for gasoline you use, and oil changes are a thing of the past. It's not likely to go through more than maybe 1 set of brake pads during its whole life, since regen braking means they get used very lightly. There's no complex transmission to wear out or need maintenance either.

  19. Re:I'd like to see ALL the subsidies end, really . by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    We're still early enough in the technology curve for EVs so they cost a premium price to purchase, and have more "hidden costs" that are less often talked about.

    Yes, we need you early adopters to pay for figuring that stuff out. Thanks!

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  20. THERE ARE ALWAYS CONSEQUENCES NAZI FAGGOT KEN DOLL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    THERE WILL ALWAYS BE CONSEQUENCES FOR YOUR LIES AND PROPAGANDA NAZI FAGGOT KEN DOLL

    Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.

  21. Maybe the enourmus tax non EV explains it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, Norway is one of the most car hating countries in the world, and been punishing it non upper class with ridiculous car prices for ages. For example Golf GTI $33.200 in Sweden and $68.500 in Nowway, that price hike is 110% tax. EV does not have any tax on it so well its' about the same price for a Tesla. Well a 75D is $76.500 but that peanuts more than the Golf for a car that is cheaper to run and own and is faster, easy choice.. It's harder when a pizza is $25 in Norway and $8 in Sweden, yea and Sweden has one of the highest taxes but well Norway is even worse, and for what? To punish the middle and working classes?

    1. Re:Maybe the enourmus tax non EV explains it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you compare cost of cars and pizzas between Norway and Sweden, it's a bit dishonest to leave out that Norwegian average salaries are significantly higher.

  22. Pure electric? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Almost a Third of New Cars Sold In Norway Last Year Were Pure Electric"

    No metal or plastic or...

    Wow! I want that.

  23. bread and circuses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no, saving the environment isn't the reason. Buying votes is the reason, and buying votes is pretty easy on the petro-economy. Nothing is green about this except the paint used for greenwashing.

  24. Re:I'd like to see ALL the subsidies end, really . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here is a thought experiment.

    Imagine the ghettos. Ancient housing, high density living. What have electric cars to offer these people? Most of these people struggle to pay their monthly electric bill, especially in wintertime. If they are lucky, they own an oldere conventional vehoicle. Electric cars are a "solution" for well paid white liberals, they offer nothing but more downward presssure on the poor, both rural and urban. Rich liberals can afford to replace a $5000 battery every few years. Our ghetto people
    are lucky to af ford $1000 for a 15 year old Toyota. Electric cars can never be "hand-me-downs" to the poor. Convential cars can be repaired by backyard mechanics. Not so with electric vehicles where the price of repair parts are beyond the reach of the low middle class and working poor.

    Mandating electric cars is like mandating everyone buy an iPhone XS Max.

  25. Cite a source? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm your god damn source. There you go.

  26. Re:I'd like to see ALL the subsidies end, really . by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

    Electric cars can never be "hand-me-downs" to the poor.

    Why on earth not? You don't need to replace a well conditioned battery every few years; researchers estimated the useful life of a Tesla battery at 500k miles at least, and numbers from the field are starting to back up those claims. There's this TV show here they MOT old cars, and they had a Tesla in with 300k km on it, and it had lost a little less than 10% of its battery capacity. By the way, at 300k it was still using the original brake discs, and was only on its second set of brake pads. Some parts of the car are harder to repair but they need those repairs far less often, and a lot of the other stuff is still fairly conventional.

    Apparently a lot of the cheaper EVs don't condition their batteries very well. But those car makers are learning their lesson and are making changes. We're still learning how to apply this tech in a durable and economical way, and in a decade or so we will have cheaper EVs hitting the second hand market, with batteries that are still going strong.

    --
    If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
  27. Electric Green and Planet Friendly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Keeping old cars on the road is green and planet friendly.
    Cars cost LOT of energy and greenhouse gas to produce - the steel, the glass, everything. An electric car would probably need 12 years of above average mileage of use just to break even.

    Any subsidy should go to people keeping 18 year plus vehicles on the road, or taking off diesels showing smokeper year in an EV are enviromental vandals.

    1. Re: Electric Green and Planet Friendly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If your electricity is at least somewhat green, this is false.
      Here in Sweden, it's more environmentally friendly to buy an EV, drive it 10000 miles and scrap it, than to keep using an ICE car that gets less than 78 mpg. And this is based on numbers from 2013 (http://shrinkthatfootprint.com/electric-car-emissions). EV batteries are almost twice as energy dense now as they were then, and last well beyond 10000 miles. And after they're no longer useful in EVs, they can be used for stationary energy storage for another 10 years.

  28. Re:Electric Green and Planet Friendly by shilly · · Score: 1

    You should have sourced your figures properly as POOMA.

    12 years. Pah.

  29. One good reason for EVs in countries with cold win by MarkH · · Score: 1

    You can get the car nice and toasty to a schedule or remote.

    Also if extreme cold don't need to keep the ICE ticking overnight.

  30. Re:I'd like to see ALL the subsidies end, really . by rl117 · · Score: 1

    The first generation of EVs like the Nissan Leaf are now reaching the second hard market in reasonable numbers (in the UK). This is because they are coming off lease from the original owners. A second hard one is still expensive, but over time they will trickle down as they depreciate. I know a few people with new and second-hand Leafs, and they all love them. With ICE manufacture on the road to being phased out, the transition is going to happen in our lifetime.

  31. Re: One good reason for EVs in countries with cold by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In countries with cold winters, most fossil fuel-powered cars have stationary heaters.

  32. You are way behind the times with range info by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    For example a student who goes home on weekends and at every semester break probably can't get by with an EV if they go to school >300 miles from home. Someone who spends a good deal of their leisure time hiking far from the city probably can't get by with a EV. Someone who spends their weekends visiting other towns, cities and the countryside can't get by with an EV.

    What decade d you live in? A Tesla model D can go 335 miles on a charge, and the long range Model 3 can go 310 miles. There also also superchargers in most large cities now making almost any trip practical. I go hiking a lot and >300 miles of range is plenty to reach anywhere you are day hiking, even over a weekend....

    I've been looking at it for a while and the ONLY place I'm not sure I could get around one very well is Utah. But even there you could make it just fine if you were on the highway, then dipped down into the southern end and relied on electric power from hotels for the night.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  33. EV requirements by DrYak · · Score: 1

    Norway generates about 90% of it's electrical power via Hydro.

    Yup. So do a couple of other countries (e.g.: Switzerland) and in the grand scheme of things, with a few key exceptions (of the top of my head: India, China and Australia - you can google to find actual studies on the subject) most countries have power generation mixes that make EV slightly less polluting than ICE over their lifetime.
    (Yup, even countries like the US that burn coal : turns out that big central optimized power plants are more efficient than an engine miniaturized enough to fit in a car)

    That, and the fact the country could fit into Texas twice, you have the perfect place for electric cars.

    Now, how does *that* has anything to do with EVs ?

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]