Slashdot Mirror


DerbyCon Will Hold Its Last InfoSec Conference in September This Year (derbycon.com)

DerbyCon 9.0, the upcoming edition of the popular InfoSec conference in September, will be its last. From an official announcement: When we first started DerbyCon, our goal was to create a conference where we could all come together to collaborate and share as a community, but most importantly as a profession. DerbyCon 1.0 was a huge gamble for us both personally and financially, but we believed in what we were doing, and it worked. For those that don't know the history of DerbyCon, it started off inside of a pizza shop as an idea between a few friends. Our goal was to create an affordable conference that shared a lot of what we had experienced in our early days in security. The ideas of collaboration, community, and the betterment of the industry and the safety of technology were at the forefront. At the end of DerbyCon 1.0, we realized that the conference was a huge success and our dream became a reality.

[...] What we have had to deal with on the back-end the past few years is more than just running a conference and sharing with friends. The conference scene in general changed drastically and small pocket groups focus on outrage and disruption where there is no right answer (regardless of how you respond, it's wrong), instead of coming together, or making the industry better. There is a small, yet vocal group of people creating negativity, polarization, and disruption, with the primary intent of self-promotion to advance a career, for personal gain, or for more social media followers. Individuals that would have us be judge, jury, and executioner for people they have had issues with outside of the conference that has nothing to do with the conference itself.

Instead of working hard in research, being a positive force in the industry, or sharing their own unique experiences (which makes us better as a whole), they tear others down in order to promote themselves. This isn't just about DerbyCon, it is present at other conferences as well and it's getting worse each year. We've spoken with a number of conference organizers, and each year it becomes substantially more difficult to host a conference where people can come together in large group settings. It's not just conferences either. This behavior is happening all over the place on social media, in our industry, targeting people trying to do good. As a community, we add fuel to fire, attack others, and give them a platform in one massive toxic environment. We do this all in fear of repercussions from upsetting others. Until this pattern changes, it will continue to get worse.

176 comments

  1. Apparently over a markerboard gag by Jarwulf · · Score: 5, Informative

    Rumour is this is all over some guy writing the word 'boobies' on a markerboard that ended up pissing off feminists. I kid you not.

    1. Re:Apparently over a markerboard gag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    2. Re:Apparently over a markerboard gag by sizzlinkitty · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What the shit? Reminds me of when the FTC lady had an issue with the girls on hacker pyramid at Defcon and I told her to STFU or leave, nobody is forcing you to be there. I had feminist hanging off every single one of my tweets for a week and calling who they thought my employer was and trying to get me fired. Don't get me wrong, I love women and I believe in equality but seriously if you don't like something, leave.

    3. Re:Apparently over a markerboard gag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Writing boobies on a white board is now sexual assault

      https://twitter.com/deborahlin...

    4. Re:Apparently over a markerboard gag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't post them. Don't give her the publicity she craves. Let her wither, without the gaze of all the idiotic followers she so desperately needs for her self-health.

    5. Re: Apparently over a markerboard gag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I figured the cia bought them out

    6. Re:Apparently over a markerboard gag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The complainer appears to have blocked me on Twitter, despite no previous contact.

      Using feminist logic, I now accuse her of committing sexual assault against me.

      #MeToo

    7. Re: Apparently over a markerboard gag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, what a total scumbag. I feel that this woman's screeching puritanism is a form of sexual assault against me. Raaaaaaaaaape!!!1!!

    8. Re:Apparently over a markerboard gag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't surprise me. I know another conference in an entirely different area (video games) that basically killed itself trying to appease SJW-types. (It still exists, AFAIK, but it went from tickets selling out in minutes to not selling out at all.)

      The problem is that you end up pissing off regular people, and the SJWs just move the goalposts. "You don't have enough women!" [add women] "Not enough minorities!" [add minorities] "You missed THESE minorities!" [add them] "Not enough LGB people." [call them out] "Not enough LGBT people!" [find a T] "Not enough LGBTQAIY people!" [and so on and so forth until you give up]

      It just never ends, and by the time you're done, the SJWs have pissed off not only regular people, they've also slowly chipped away at their own group so that no one is happy, even among the SJWs. (It's darkly funny to watch the SJW crowd turn on itself to complain about which minorities are more important to represent and how many different subgroups you can add to that LGB acronym. It doesn't matter what you do, someone will be angry.)

    9. Re: Apparently over a markerboard gag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Until now I thought that no-one could be worse than Jessica Price...

    10. Re:Apparently over a markerboard gag by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Anonymous conference means I assume it is made up. Name?

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    11. Re:Apparently over a markerboard gag by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 1, Interesting

      That's hilarious.

      The real problem in my opinion though is that they're too afraid about taking a common sense stance. We've become a cowardly lot.

    12. Re:Apparently over a markerboard gag by Un-Thesis · · Score: 1

      I don't understand! She even states in one tweet that the word is equal to sexual assault! https://twitter.com/deborahlin... I DO NOT UNDERSTAND THIS DYSTOPIA WE HAVE SUDDENLY FOUND OURSELVES IN!!

      --
      Promote freedom; fight fascism.
    13. Re:Apparently over a markerboard gag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reading her tweets, I think it's less about the 'Boobies' as the '#metoo', which*IS* explicitly to do with sexual assault. We may not agree it's a reason to cancel a whole con, but it's use in that context is somewhat distasteful and vulgar. It's the kind of behaviour that would get me a warning at work, which is as it should be. I feel that we have to be intellectually honest, even with people with whom we disagree, other what's the point of having a debate at all?

    14. Re:Apparently over a markerboard gag by Mr.+Dollar+Ton · · Score: 1

      This is as clear a case of manufactured outrage as there could be.

    15. Re:Apparently over a markerboard gag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So it's another "Go Woke, Go Broke" story?

      This is what happens if you let those "well-meaning" CoC progressives into your organization: they will eventually kill it. Either by driving everyone away with their politics or by shutting it down because it's too problematic.

    16. Re:Apparently over a markerboard gag by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1, Informative

      Reading her Twitter feed, this Lindsey Ledford sounds like pure poison, of the kind that the DerbyCon organizers describe. They focus on the negative and blow it out of all proportion just so they can have their little crusade. It is time to deplatform the lot of them... ignoring them is not good enough, because they will always manage to kick up enough of a public stink to have respectable people withdraw their support of what you're doing. Venue operators, sponsors and advertisers, even your employer... the last thing they want is public controversy in which they are involved.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    17. Re: Apparently over a markerboard gag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anonymous timeline of SJW bullshit at cons https://t.co/gq2uFWRc6W

    18. Re:Apparently over a markerboard gag by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Don't get me wrong, I love women and I believe in equality

      You shouldn't have to f'ing write that... but lately I find myself making similar half baked apologies in my posts as well. The fact that you feel you need to make this clear in advance is a sign of how toxic public debate has become.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    19. Re:Apparently over a markerboard gag by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      What #MeToo? I didn't see anything offensive on that board (though I am having trouble reading some of the remarks). Which is the offensive one?

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    20. Re:Apparently over a markerboard gag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Second pic in this tweet: https://twitter.com/deborahlindseyl/status/1048401891913334785

    21. Re:Apparently over a markerboard gag by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Actually she was offended by that someone wrote #metoo next to "boobies". Personally I think she has a point.

    22. Re:Apparently over a markerboard gag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously I have my doubts about who write this on the wall. I wouldn't at all be surprised she did it.

      She doesn't look that much interested in cybersecurity - judging by her Twitter posts. I am convinced she went to the conference in search of self promotion, not because of he genuine interest in the security. It's sad to see such people dictate their way on society .

    23. Re:Apparently over a markerboard gag by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      Seriously, that’s it? It’s an inappropriate and unprofessional little joke, but it comes nowhere near making light of sexual assault.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    24. Re:Apparently over a markerboard gag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Letâ(TM)s look at this case. The board was for writing things that help you relax, or something similar. Now its factually true that for a lot of men especially, looking at the bodies of women is in fact what they do to relax. Those familiar with Internet would know there is an entire industry around enabling that. Now had the person written "pornography" would have got a better reception? I don't know, but I doubt it. So, we have a group of supposed intelligent people that can't engage in a factual discussion. Okay someone being snarky wrote "#metoo." Obviously, a joke, perhaps in poor taste but a joke.

      So how would adults handle this?
      1) Do nothing, itâ(TM)s not important move on to more important things
      2) Reach out con-staff and say something like "I appreciate this is probably a bad attempt at humor or maybe was even a serious attempt to participate in the conversation, but the language is juvenile and in appropriate in my opinion and it makes me and probably others uncomfortable."

      at which point Con-staff would have covered up the message. (what they did). The matter should have ended there. But like a petulant children various people took to twitter to slam the convention and staff because of something silly a couple attendees did which we addressed reasonably as soon as we were made aware.

      I know In past years from talking to staff, there have been somewhat more serious but uncorroborated incidents where people rather than approaching staff, contacting the hotel staff, or local law enforcement decided that twitter was the best place to for help. They then chose to act shocked and outraged again all over twitter to discover that (at least in those early years) nobody from the convention was bird dogging twitter 24-7. Again, for some reason an 'adult' thought that a public forum was the best placed to go with their supposedly real safety concern.

      Frankly the pattern is exhausting and itâ(TM)s no surprise the organizers just gave up. We now have a society where so many people are so infantilized, they canâ(TM)t handle seeing âoeboobiesâ written on whiteboard. So lazy, stupid, they canâ(TM)t pick up a phone and dial-0 or 911 or walk up to one of the people in the red shirts with the radios and report a problem â" or are knowingly making false accusations and have no compunction about that other than getting caught themselves. Its hopeless. You canâ(TM)t run an event like this would fully trained armed staff with law enforcement powers anymore. Nobody besides maybe DefCon want run a hacker con like its an NFL game in terms of security its not worth it.

    25. Re:Apparently over a markerboard gag by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      #metoo is a hashtag used by sexual assault victims. To use in another context trivializes the meaning. But the point is guys: time to grow up and learn some manners. I blame it on parents who never taught their children what is appropriate. Why write "boobies" and #metoo on a whiteboard at a conference? It isn't a frat house. It is just stupid. Yeah, we get it, you like boobs. So do 4 billion other people.

    26. Re:Apparently over a markerboard gag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      #LightenUpFrancis

    27. Re:Apparently over a markerboard gag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. That was the real issue.

    28. Re: Apparently over a markerboard gag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Iconoclasm is a valuable service when surrounded by holy cows. Or in this case, sanctimonious cows.

    29. Re:Apparently over a markerboard gag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what if he #metoo was written by someone who saw the "boobies" as an example of harassment ?

    30. Re:Apparently over a markerboard gag by DarkOx · · Score: 4, Insightful

      #metoo is a hashtag used by sexual assault victims.

      No, #metoo WAS a hashtag used by sexual assault victims by the time this happen it had become a hash tag used by whiners and outright frauds.

      Look at the person doing the complaining on twitter she outright stated, this incident amounted to sexual assault. It SHE who is making light of tragic things that have happened to real victims, so that she can be popular on twitter. She is the one doing real harm to the cause and you are too by defending her! Yes someone made very stupid joke in very poor taste about a serious matter. Hey I guess we'd better string anyone who has ever played cards against humanity and especially its creators up right away right? Oh no because they are 'woke' or whatever.

      Bad taste though it might be it really is harmless fun. By acting like its even in the same universe of concern of what is actually "sexual assault" that is where the real trivialization is occurring. You should be assumed of yourself.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    31. Re:Apparently over a markerboard gag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm not going to give them any free advertising. It was a well known video game conference (even got mentioned here a few times) that has since turned into an SJW video game conference where all the panels are on crazy things like "LGBTQIAY Identities In Video Game Protagonists" or "Trans-Identifying First Person Shooters" or whatever. They've gone from constantly growing each year to tickets being trivial to get, all because they caved to SJWs.

    32. Re:Apparently over a markerboard gag by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It seems like they just wanted an excuse to give it up. I mean what kind of snowflake would drop their entire conference over one complaint?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    33. Re:Apparently over a markerboard gag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but it wasn't

    34. Re:Apparently over a markerboard gag by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Maybe your parents should have told you that writing "boobies" on a whiteboard at a conference isn't what grown ups do.

    35. Re:Apparently over a markerboard gag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I do love watching SJWs try and reclaim the word "snowflake" as if somehow projecting their own faults onto rational people will make them less noticeable, not more.

      It's not just one complaint. It's never just one complaint. It starts with one complaint, then they drag in more and more people to echo that one complaint and just keep it snowballing until you get bombarded with junk and they drown out the reasonable people.

    36. Re:Apparently over a markerboard gag by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      I am pretty sure she said that the use of #metoo was making light of sexual assault victims, not that it was assault, but she uses Twitter and anyone who uses Twitter is an idiot so you might be right. The point is: time to grow up. Go ahead and make "bad taste" jokes about boobies all you want, but do it in private, not at a conference where normal humans are present. No one else wants to hear your garbage. It isn't harmless, because it is idiotic and idiots like you bring the entire human race down.

    37. Re:Apparently over a markerboard gag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      did you read the mind of who ever wrote it?

    38. Re:Apparently over a markerboard gag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Maybe your parents shouldn't have been siblings.

    39. Re:Apparently over a markerboard gag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PoundMeToo

    40. Re:Apparently over a markerboard gag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I recently followed a infosec thread about the NEED (not want, but need) to stop using the word guys when talking to a group. It's apparently they greatest threat facing infosec today. If you say guys in reference to a group you are apparently a piece of shit. I think I might become a mechanic.

    41. Re:Apparently over a markerboard gag by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      How about people grow a bit thicker skin?

      How about trying NOT to be in a constant state of looking to be offended?

      Get the fuck over it, you should not have your whole life ruined because someone make a joke, off color, sexist, racist or not...

      If it offends you, blow it off, surely you have MORE important topics that need your attention?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    42. Re:Apparently over a markerboard gag by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      No thanks. If you are an asshole I am going to tell you about it. Sorry snowflakes. Time to grow up.

    43. Re:Apparently over a markerboard gag by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I've done some more digging and it seems that:

      - One person complained about the "boobies #metoo"
      - Another person complained about it
      - They eventually did something about it
      - First person complained that it took them too long to do anything

      That's it. No mobs, no mass complaints or twitter storms, no accusations or campaigns. It's utterly bizarre, they sound like there was a huge drama when in reality they read a couple of emails and removed a sheet of paper from a wall.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    44. Re:Apparently over a markerboard gag by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      No thanks. If you are an asshole I am going to tell you about it. Sorry snowflakes. Time to grow up.

      Fine call me an asshole, It really don't bother me, nor should it bother anyone else.

      The point is, if what I say offends you, don't get all butt-hurt about it and complain and shut a whole conference down because someone there wrote something you didn't like.

      If you don't like someone's sense of humor, don't let it ruin your day, and you needn't ruin someone else day either.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    45. Re:Apparently over a markerboard gag by cayenne8 · · Score: 2

      Actually she was offended by that someone wrote #metoo next to "boobies". Personally I think she has a point.

      It's a joke.

      Get over it.

      Geez, everyone is out on a permanent crusade to be perpetually offended.

      If you don't like it, sure express your opinion, but you needn't try to shut down a convention, or ruin someone else's day...or even ridicule someone that finds it funny. It's their right to have different opinions and different sense of humor than you.

      At some point, the conferences like this need to just figure out, that the SJW's and snowflakes just will never be appeased, and just say fuck it, and go on and not worry about offending a niche interest, and go on with their main goals.

      If you're afraid of losing corporate funding and advertisement, then figure a way to privately fund your gathering.

      At this point, the mass of perpetually offended starting to go so far as to piss off the majority of people that don't really give a fuck about this whining, and just want to get on with things like we've been able to do in the US till recently just fine.

      If you need the folks to kick in a bit more for tickets and donations to fund your gathering/convention, ask them and maybe even go out of your way to say this is to avoid the troubles that the SJW's and current batch of snowflakes try to pose if someone says the wrong thing, or makes a joke that others are offended by.

      At some point, people need to have the courage to say "enough"...and basically if you don't like it...go somewhere else.

      At some point you have to say "we don't give a fuck" and go about your business.

      As long as you aren't breaking a law, they can't stop you.

      They can bitch and moan, but you can escort them out and let them protest out in the cold and rain to their hearts delight, but you have to at some point figure there's always going to be a fringe that is loudly vocal and you just have to be willing to ignore them.

      That pisses them off the most.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    46. Re:Apparently over a markerboard gag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's almost certainly not just the "boobies" thing alone. In 2017, this was posted demanding that several people be disinvited from upcoming Derbycons. As the organizer said in a tweet, "it was a culmination of things we’ve had to deal with over the years."

    47. Re:Apparently over a markerboard gag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you say fuck and don't bow to the sjw's you might find that you can't find a place to hold a conference, because they will then target the venue with "why are you allowing misogynist, bigoted etc. etc. to use you facilities"

    48. Re:Apparently over a markerboard gag by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Look at the person doing the complaining on twitter she outright stated, this incident amounted to sexual assault.

      She did not say that. Obviously I can't prove a negative, so the onus is on you to provide a link to the tweet. I'm sure that someone on Reddit archived it, even if it has been deleted from Twitter.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    49. Re:Apparently over a markerboard gag by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      The ruination came from attitudes just like yours. There are socially malevolent individuals that reek of testosterone.... rampant dominant assholes, full of themselves, fingers in their ears, that can't tolerate the very presence of others unlike themselves.

      The organizers did give up, even though borderline behavior wasn't prosecuted. They DID stop them. Misplaced criticism of "SJW"s blinds you to the values of embracing diverse viewpoints, including the loud ones, to the point where the loud ones just overwhelm the resources and credulity of those attending.

      The professionalism of the event spawned lots of positive action. And there were those whose unprofessional, pointedly sexist and misogynistic attitudes finally screwed it up for everyone.... unable to keep their minds away from their gonads.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    50. Re: Apparently over a markerboard gag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that's how toxicity spreads. Unfounded rumors spread as truth.

    51. Re:Apparently over a markerboard gag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are socially malevolent individuals that reek of estrogen.... rampant dominant assholes, full of themselves, fingers pointing any someone(anyone) else, that can't tolerate the very presence of others unlike themselves.

    52. Re:Apparently over a markerboard gag by postbigbang · · Score: 2

      These two polar ends do not cancel each other out.

      There are also plainly decent individuals that are strongly and rightly repelled by either end of those poles. I didn't see a predominance of the over-estrogened, rather people trying to learn, do knowledge transfer, converse, and learn.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    53. Re: Apparently over a markerboard gag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup. Putting #metoo in a list of things that make you feel good is supporting the movement. Not making fun of it.

      Whoever wrote it feels good that the issue is finally being noticed.

      This lady just wants victims to stay quiet!

    54. Re:Apparently over a markerboard gag by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Free advertising this deep in a nested conversation with ACs every other reply (and thus auto-hidden??) Unfortunately, "video game conference" produces too many results to comb through them all. Or, if you want to be oblique, try just stating a city and month. That seems sufficiently obfuscated to not give them free press, yet able to determine a unique conference.

      Otherwise,my guess is you are dramatically overstating both their numbers and the quantity and type of new talks, and don't want to be checked.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    55. Re: Apparently over a markerboard gag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Growing up means maturing, and maturing means not freaking out over insignificant fun the way SJWs like you do.

      Ever notice how grandparents often have to tell their children to stop freaking out over every little thing that goes wrong wirh their kids? Or how parents have to do that with angsty teens? Same thing, except that SJWs never get over the angsty teen thing and think the whole world needs to revolve around them and that everything they decide is important needs attending to their way RIGHT NOW.

      Simply put, it is you who needs to grow up, snowflake.

    56. Re:Apparently over a markerboard gag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe if you weren't such a faggot you wouldn't need a "mental health village" at your pussy nerd gathering

    57. Re:Apparently over a markerboard gag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, a fellow white knight. We should quest together to protect M'Ladies. Doth thou agree?

    58. Re: Apparently over a markerboard gag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's just put it this way: ten years ago it was the biggest video game convention and there would be no question which one I meant.

      Now? Not so much. You can't even guess because they've lost so many people.

    59. Re:Apparently over a markerboard gag by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      Didn't say that at all. I prefer an egalitarian, non-hostile event.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    60. Re:Apparently over a markerboard gag by complete+loony · · Score: 1

      What helps you deal with stress? Boobies

      #MeToo, my wife's boobs are great stress relief. And she'd never call my attention sexual assault, even if she is annoyed sometimes.

      What, I'm not allowed to use that hashtag, because you made it a popular reference to sexual assault? Is that what this escalation is ultimately about? Sheesh, they're just words, quit grandstanding and get over it.

      --
      09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
    61. Re:Apparently over a markerboard gag by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      I can't even tell difference anymore between The Onion headlines and real ones.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    62. Re: Apparently over a markerboard gag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So...you're a brony then.

    63. Re: Apparently over a markerboard gag by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      I don't watch tv, and so have no concept of what you're implying.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    64. Re:Apparently over a markerboard gag by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      ...that reek of testosterone

      You act like there's something wrong with that.

      Are you one of those out there that also think it is best to break down men in general, and emasculate them?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    65. Re:Apparently over a markerboard gag by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      Emasculation isn't necessary. Non-provoking civility is. Macho is tawdry. Real men don't need to diminish the dignity of others for their amusement and ego gratification. Most grow out of that stage. I did.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    66. Re:Apparently over a markerboard gag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't get me wrong, I love women and I believe in equality

      You shouldn't have to f'ing write that... but lately I find myself making similar half baked apologies in my posts as well. The fact that you feel you need to make this clear in advance is a sign of how toxic public debate has become.

      That you feel the need to make "half baked apologies" isn't a sign of how "toxic" public debate has become. It's a sign that you don't actually believe in equality or eliminating harassment, or otherwise moving into the 21st century. Your use of the word "toxic" is a further clue - because people who support those things don't find the environment "toxic". But backwards misogynists do...

    67. Re:Apparently over a markerboard gag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hah, I use the word "guys" for describing groups all the time, *especially* when women are in said group.

      It helps me easily and swiftly weed out all the stupid, overly offended bitches with no skills outside of complaining all the damn time about everything.

      There are many women who are are honoured, not offended, to be viewed and referred to as one of the guys. These women tend to be engineers, nerds, street chicks and trained fighters. They solve problems and face challenges every day of their lives and are proud to do so. They make themselves better through knowledge, training and hardship. They suffer no jealousy, save that which inspires them to achieve more for themselves.

      The women who get offended by being "misgendered" are more often the weakest examples of women you could possibly find -- weak in both mind and body -- and lacking in life experience. They are fragile, useless and lazy. They are angry because they amount to nothing. They make themselves feel better not by bettering themselves, but by attacking everyone else around them until everyone is as paranoid and unemployed as they are. They suffer jealousy constantly because they have no skills or talents of their own to be proud of, and they blame others for why they cannot attain such levels of mastery, not realizing it is them who put the barriers in front of themselves.

      So go and cry, SJWs. Cry to your parents about how you are a worthless cumstain on the tapestry of our great species of thinkers and creators. Cry about how you cannot heal, you cannot create and you cannot even think because nobody ever believed in you. Not your parents, not your friends, not even yourself. All you can do is destroy, and once you have tired from all the destruction, the rest of the world will be ready to rebuild what you have torn down and demonstrate the vanity of your efforts.

    68. Re:Apparently over a markerboard gag by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      The top post in this thread illustrates how bad this has become. It's currently modded down to -1, but its actually a joke about birdwatching. I'll repeat that again, it's a joke, about birdwatching. However, since it's at the expense of SJWs, they've modded it down to the lowest rating it can get, presumably because even joking about SJW-ism is a grevious offence worthy of death to the person who made it.

  2. Social Media to the rescue! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well there you go: "something that would normally not be an issue explodes into a catastrophic situation on social media".

    You let social media get in the way you deal with humans face to face.

    I was at last years DerbyCon ... it was my 1st ... my enduring thought: You get this many mouth-breathing geeks with no social awareness together with other "elitist" geeks and it's a friggin mess. I couldn't take it and had to leave. Nothing against the DerbyCon people ... they don't pick the attendees. They did pick the bands tho, and that was next level terrible.

    1. Re: Social Media to the rescue! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WW3 is going to be the neckbeards against the legbeards and the aftermath will be smelt centuries to come.

      We, the rest of society, had this naive idea that in the future everyone would work together for a common good. But then reality set in. Instead of creating a new chapter of equality for all of humanity, we gave open field to roaring misandrists determined to equal Hitler in their destructive capacities, because they felt people they disagree with had it coming.

  3. SJWs ruined it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SJWs obviously ruined Derbycon.

    1. Re: SJWs ruined it by astrofurter · · Score: 0

      "Social justice warrior", abbreviated "SJW", is deprecated. The new preferred term for villains such as the angry neopuritan who ruined DerbyCon is "social just-us nazi", abbreviated "nazi".

    2. Re: SJWs ruined it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep crying nazi faggots, Trump hangs either way.

    3. Re: SJWs ruined it by N_Piper · · Score: 0

      HA-HA. You realize, obviously Ha-Ha, that the thin skinned screeching far left are only half the problem and are making a joke by posting a satirical comment, an exaggeration of truthful negative traits to call issue to the lesser actual traits, as if you were a right wing manchild with an ego so fragile calling it glass would conjure up the angry spirits of glass makers from antiquity, Te-He.
      Ha-Ha it is as if the satirical reader did not read the excerpt from the featured article where it evenly lays blame both on offenders and offendees, Ha-Hoo.
      Ha-Ha see how the satire is augmented by his description of people not tolerating his racist & sexist bullshit as belonging to a much reviled historical group is a brazen defiance of both accuracy and good taste, He-He.
      Ha-Ha oh it is to laugh it's as if everyone just FORGOT that hostile nations have actually been documented, with complete paper trails, attempting to galvanize extremists on both sides for literal years, forcing a Government deadlock EXACTLY like the one we are in AT THIS VERY FUCKING MINUET, oh Ha-Ha my sides hurt.
      Whoooo...
      That was a good one, it sure is a good thing that will help me sleep well tonight knowing that we are all adults here who function in a civilised society and not a bunch of figurative howling mandrills waving our colorfully engorged buttocks around in text form.
      Te-FUCKING-He.

    4. Re: SJWs ruined it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you smoking? And why aren't you sharing it with the rest of us?

    5. Re: SJWs ruined it by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You can't appropriate Nazi while we literally still have real Nazis running around, to say nothing of neo-Nazis. Nice try there, sport.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re: SJWs ruined it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sounds like Nazi talk there bub.

    7. Re: SJWs ruined it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut up, nazi.

    8. Re: SJWs ruined it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't appropriate Nazi while we literally still have real Nazis running around, to say nothing of neo-Nazis. Nice try there, sport.

      You are a Nazi.

    9. Re: SJWs ruined it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Real Nazis?

      No, they were defeated.

      In 1945.

      You want to know what that was like, go to a legion hall. Listen to their stories. Learn what real Nazis were like, back when they had an air force. You will be fucking TERRIFIED by these stories, but you will leave happy knowing that they're gone.

      All that's left is some dumb teenagers drawing swastikas with sharpies on bathroom walls. They call themselves Nazis, but they're just as much Nazis as Star Wars fans are Jedi. Nothing but harmless, make-believe fantasies about wielding non-existent power.

    10. Re: SJWs ruined it by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      "Real Nazis?
      No, they were defeated.
      In 1945."

      The third Reich was defeated. Plenty of Nazis ran off with their stolen art and Jew gold and settled in Argentina or Costa Rica, etc. Or went to work for the US government.

      "All that's left is some dumb teenagers drawing swastikas with sharpies on bathroom walls."

      There's plenty of that, but there's also organized groups of white supremacists doing stuff like infiltrating police and military organizations. Or taking the presidency...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    11. Re: SJWs ruined it by astrofurter · · Score: 1

      "organized groups of white supremacists doing stuff like infiltrating police and military organizations"

      There are no "white supremacists". Such cartoonish villains exist only in racist divide-and-conquer propaganda, and in the imaginations of people whipped into a frenzy by said propaganda.

  4. This is happening in all sorts of social groups.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is happening in all sorts of social groups across America..

    Small, yet vocal group of people and hashtag mobs creating negativity, polarization, and disruption throughout society..

    Things like Facebook have amplified this to 11, making it impossible to organize social events of pretty much any kind anymore in America (whether its tech, music, arts..etc).

    I wish I knew what the solution was.. as for me, just I ignore it all.. if I didn't see it myself, or someone I *really* trust didn't see it either..as far as I am concerned it didn't happen.. (shitty I know, but I don't have a better solution right now..)

  5. good for them by dmitrygr · · Score: 1

    good for them

    --
    -------
    1. Enjoy your job
    2. Make lots of money
    3. Work within the law

    Choose any two.
  6. good for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    good for you

  7. Insulted by backslashdot · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You canâ(TM)t have freedom to express yourself without the freedom to cause someone to feel insulted.

    The two are related, if you cannot insult someone. Nearly all free speech is bound to make someone feel bad. If you say you got bad customer service, the service agent will feel bad. Nearly all speech will make somebody feel bad.

    1. Re:Insulted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> Nearly all speech will make somebody feel bad.

      Have you tried giving more compliments to others? Here is one example to get you started:

      Your liver would make an excellent entree.

    2. Re: Insulted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This comment made me feel bad /joke

      Instead of complaining could those offended people not just erase the markerboard?? Or scribble over it???

      And since when is writing "boobies" somewhere considered sexual assault? Are the same people going to sue HBO for the rape scene or any of the bare breasts of sex scenes on game of thrones?

    3. Re: Insulted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I must a watched a pirate copy because those were men, er warriors exposed to harsh weather...

    4. Re:Insulted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since the objective of saying 'you got bad customer service' is to make someone feel bad, it's not surprising that it attains the result. There are other far more constructive ways of expressing your dissatisfaction with whatever aspects of the service that displease you.

    5. Re:Insulted by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      And of course it works both ways. You can't expect people not to criticise you for something you said, even if it makes you feel bad and not want to carry on exercising your free speech any more.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  8. Re:This is happening in all sorts of social groups by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >Small, yet vocal group of people and hashtag mobs creating negativity, polarization, and disruption throughout society..

    "Please stop calling the US "America", it is not."

    (i.e. small vocal groups like this complainer... )

    exactly as I was saying...

  9. Re: Pffft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Haha... you took SANS courses... rube!

  10. Re: Pffft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't be jealous, Cleatus. My employer can afford 6 grand for the best infosec training.

  11. Re: Derbycon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mark Zuckerberg, Sundar Pichai, Nancy Pelosi, and Hillary Clinton will be sharing a cell in the gulag. Yay gulag!!1!

  12. Re: Pffft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow... you have a job... does that make you feel special? Do you imagine that shouting "hillbilly" at people you don't know, and bragging about overpriced vocational training courses, will somehow disguise the obvious fact that you're a half-educated suburban yokel with no actual talent for infosec?

    Does it embarrass you that many of your kin are redneck white trash hillbillies? Deep down in your heart you know that you, too, are a redneck - and you're terrified that anyone will find out. Is it depressing to have so much irrational hatred for your own family and heritage?

  13. Re:This is happening in all sorts of social groups by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    STFU mutt
    STFU burger
    STFU walmart scooter riding, retarded rotting fatberg, inbred bastard son of a flyover hillbilly.

    America is the us, and the us is America

  14. Used to be a girl with legit nerd cred... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would burn you with her wit, experience, or skills.

    Now they're just like a gang of first graders again, ganging up on random people they don't like because of a real or imagined slight then calling in the teacher or yard duty on you, while going nya nya nya nya.

    The sad part to me is most of the women worth having in tech made the smart choice and went with another career. Not because they couldn't do it, but because the pay was better, and they didn't have to deal with the kinds of bullshit they didn't like. And you know what? The juvenile humor wasn't the bullshit most of them cared about. And that other kind is still there, grinding up those foolish enough to stay into dust.

    Me? I never got my foot in the door and after a while lost the motivation to deal with the bullshit in the open source community as well

    1. Re:Used to be a girl with legit nerd cred... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me? I never got my foot in the door and after a while lost the motivation to deal with the bullshit in the open source community as well

      Another thing that would have prevented you from succeeding as a female in the open source community is you being a straight white male.

    2. Re: Used to be a girl with legit nerd cred... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lordy. The updated reboot of the Salem witch hunts, that no one asked for. I wish there was a remote that had a mute button.

    3. Re:Used to be a girl with legit nerd cred... by the_B0fh · · Score: 1

      Another thing that would have prevented you from succeeding as a female in the open source community is you being a straight white male.

      Aren't most people who are successful in open source straight white males? Where are you getting your data from?

    4. Re: Used to be a girl with legit nerd cred... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoosh. You can't succeed as a female (in anything) if you're not a female (e.g. male, of any sexual orientation, or any made up gender instead). Tautology?

  15. Cue the whining about SJWs. by shess · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Tomorrow morning I expect most of the comments on this thread to be about how SJWs ruin everything, and Linux has gone to hell in a handbasket since they stopped letting developers swear, and how the only true communications are insults. What a brave new world!

    1. Re:Cue the whining about SJWs. by Jarwulf · · Score: 1

      Can't actually defend her actions I see.

    2. Re:Cue the whining about SJWs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who specifically are you referring to?

    3. Re: Cue the whining about SJWs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This woman's actions are the reason why many men (myself included) refuse to deal with women on a basis of lack of trust.

      When we know that any action can be perceived as a slight , ism or * harrassment we would be crazy to even be around them.

      The boys are going back to the boys club because we let you in and you called us rapists. Sucks for women.

    4. Re:Cue the whining about SJWs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Tomorrow morning I expect most of the comments on this thread to be about how SJWs ruin everything

      Rightfully so.

      These progressives insert themselves into things others have built and destroy them with their narrow-minded extremist politics. They contribute nothing but conflict.

    5. Re: Cue the whining about SJWs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The kids are alright

    6. Re:Cue the whining about SJWs. by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      You have to notice how, every time, all they want to do is control others' behavior. Every single time.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    7. Re: Cue the whining about SJWs. by ShieldSystr · · Score: 1

      Tbh, As A women .. the SJWs eat their own.. if you have a vaginal bleed monthly , but disagree with them.. you are exhibiting signs of interalized toxic masculinity ..

    8. Re:Cue the whining about SJWs. by shess · · Score: 1

      Tomorrow morning I expect most of the comments on this thread to be about how SJWs ruin everything

      Rightfully so.

      These progressives insert themselves into things others have built and destroy them with their narrow-minded extremist politics. They contribute nothing but conflict.

      Truth! I can't remember the last time I saw sliced bread, and vaccinations haven't been available for decades! Pretty soon we'll be back to rooms full of women being called "computers". We live in a hellish landscape of continuous dissent, and it is ALL caused by SJWs!

  16. the fuck? by gl4ss · · Score: 2

    from the writeup I would have thought it was because people were using it to PROMOTE THEMSELVES FOR GETTING MONEY purely by fluffing up shit(and providing shit all nothing content).

    instead it's of some guy writing boobies, doing the exact opposite of that? fuck this shit.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    1. Re:the fuck? by complete+loony · · Score: 1

      Their rage isn't directed at the guy who wrote it, but the people who get "social media" offended about it.

      --
      09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
    2. Re: the fuck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was a LOT more then just Boobies, and yes it was gold diggers this gas been going on for at least 3 years .

  17. And this is why... by 6Yankee · · Score: 2

    ...we can't have nice things.

  18. Deviant Ollum? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just a deviant faggot that plays with guns.

    1. Re: Deviant Ollum? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Faggot troll is a faggot.

      - APK

  19. Re: Boobies boobies boobies? Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Give me your man boobies bezos

  20. It could be worse. by LordHighExecutioner · · Score: 1

    Just try attending an amateur radio meeting!

  21. Radical Idea: Just Say No by The_Other_Kelly · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why do people, especially value-neutral technically-focused people ... not just start saying: No!

    No. We want to focus on our stuff and have no obligation to engage with your issues.
    No. We will not ban people because you want us to.
    No. You cannot have special treatment. You get the same as everyone else. Nothing more, nothing less.
    No. We will not enforce your Purity Code of Conduct. Want an ethics code? Use the ACM's. Or the IEEE.
    No. Your chosen group membership does not compensate for your lack of ability. Meritocracy or GTFO.
    No. You have not been elected, and do not represent the community you claim to defend.
    No. We will not apologise for our intrinsic attributes, whether skin color or lifestyle choices.
    No. Your ideological goals will not cause your behaviour to be overlooked or forgiven. You are what you do.

    And in return: You get the same freedom from our interference.

    The VILENESS of some activists, both left and right, but increasingly primarily on the left,
    is despicable. Bipolar, partisan, nastiness. 100% agreement or you will be purged and punished.
    Instead of merely a "2 minute hate" session, they are in a continual state of ideological fervour.
    And like children, they are constantly calling for Authority to bring force down on their enemies.
    More rules. More control. More force. Comply or be purged.

    If this is not how you want to live, it is time to start telling them: NO!

    Or is this now Radical as well?

    --
    (R)ule in Hell or (S)erve in Heaven [R]?
    1. Re:Radical Idea: Just Say No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have also wondered about this, too. Why don't people just say no?

    2. Re:Radical Idea: Just Say No by The_Other_Kelly · · Score: 1

      Fear. It takes courage to stand up to bullies, and not everyone has the support or the capability to do so.

      Maybe I should have put this more positively: How can we help people to be able to, say no!

      --
      (R)ule in Hell or (S)erve in Heaven [R]?
    3. Re:Radical Idea: Just Say No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that it doesn't just stay in the room anymore. It's the amplification, not speech, that's at issue. They rally (and find it not only righteous, but fun or entertaining) and once they get started, they also come after your job, your family, your friends, your community, etc., at a national level too. And it's never forgotten or lost either. Your career is ruined, and perhaps everything about your personal life too, for disagreeing (and not even being the initial insulter, but just engaging in debate). You may be banned from travel, can't go out to eat, etc.. Being the organizer or some authoritative figure, any authoritative figure!, you get held responsible...and that's what makes these things not worthwhile anymore. It's no longer about the thing itself, the purpose, and the participation, but the experience of the thing to those merely in attendance or worse, consumption (and the customer is always right).

    4. Re:Radical Idea: Just Say No by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      It isn't about just "standing up" either. In this day and age, people can find out where you live and your contact information and harass you and your family. They can also get you fired from your job. The best thing to do is not to engage with the perpetually offended types, although in this case she has a point. Who would write #metoo on a whiteboard next to "boobies"? It is rather disrespectful. People need to grow up.

    5. Re:Radical Idea: Just Say No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With sjw's it doesn't matter how you say anything it will always be wrong..
      Take asking out someone that you might be interested in..
      If a guy asks a women out (even if being very respectful)there is a very good chance they will say no and then claim to be all offended..
      No on the other hand if a woman was to ask out a bloke and he says no (for whatever reason, in a relationship or just doesn't like the person or worse doesn't find them attractive) the man cannot refuse that in anyway she won't get her knickers in a twist... he is as good as unemployed and probably unemployable...

      Personally Asian women are not attractive to me but if I was to tell them that I'm the worst person in the world!! Even if I just say no thanks they will push for a reason and I'm fucked!! (And not in a good way) For this reason I avoid working with women either in a group or one on one.. it's a sad state of affairs. Cuz there are some really smart women out there..
      Now if a woman doesn't find the bloke attractive she is allowed to say just that and no chance of any repocussions falling on her... how is this not creating a toxic workplace???
      I live by the old saying "what's good for the goose is good for the gander"
      But that will get me fired everyday of the week.. so instead I have to lie to them and tell them I'm gay...
      and now that I run my own business I can't say I refuse to hire a woman but you know what, even if the government offered me a rebate of twice her salary she still wouldnt get the job cuz that won't cover the cost of the toxicity that she will most probably bring into the office...
      It's a much better place to work where we get to be ourselves with out the fear of some woman suing me..
      I'm sorry to all the women that send resumes in cuz they go straight into the round file... and if a woman slips thru into an interview she still ends up in the round file.. it's a harsh world and the sjw's are to blame... he raped me with his eyes!!!!

    6. Re:Radical Idea: Just Say No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look in the mirror. You sound like the toxic one, and my guess is that you would/do promote that toxicity around yourself.

    7. Re:Radical Idea: Just Say No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It wouldn't be such an issue if people such as yourself kept your professional life separate from your personal life. Come to work, do your job, and keep your opinions of others to yourself, and be fair and honest in your dealings with others.

    8. Re:Radical Idea: Just Say No by The_Other_Kelly · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I agree with the degree of danger.

      But this is the point. If you leave a whiteboard somewhere, it is likely that someone will write something on it.
      Maybe interesting, probably not, potentially offensive.

      But think what the protestor means:
              Rather than rub out what someone else wrote, rather than write something themselves,
              what do they do?

              Appeal to authority. Demand enforcement. Insist that *everything* has to be controlled
              lest someone do *anything* which *anyone* could find "offensive". Or disrepectful.
              Or somehow in breach of someone's perception of the currently fashionable convention.

      For example: Draw a bird? Offensive to 1950s Maoists. A Blue flower? Nazi.
      A yellow ribbon? Militarist.

      In fact drawing *anything* could be taken as offensive against the Differently Abled,
      for example the Blind.

      There are no more boundaries. No compromise. People want to exercise power over you
      and they *will* find a reason, an excuse or a crack somewhere.

      If someone doesn't like something written on the white board, then bloody well rub it out.

      Let's stop pandering to the Drama merchants.

      Just say NO.

      --
      (R)ule in Hell or (S)erve in Heaven [R]?
    9. Re:Radical Idea: Just Say No by The_Other_Kelly · · Score: 1

      To be or not to be.

      If we run away from these bullies, they not only win this one, they keep winning until everything is disrupted.
      Which is their goal.

      They have the power we give them.

      If I was an employer and someone called me asking to fire an employee for something they said or did,
      which was not illegal, then I would tell them to "Fet Gucked".
      If I was an organiser, I would laugh in their faces.
      If a customer, and they tried this versus a supplier, again, "Guck Off" is the most valid response.
      A colleague? I chose the non-bullying, non-manipulative, non-trashy colleague.

      Etc, etc.

      These are nasty people, and placating them with any form of indulgence, just feeds them.

      Hard, cold, NO.

      --
      (R)ule in Hell or (S)erve in Heaven [R]?
    10. Re:Radical Idea: Just Say No by The_Other_Kelly · · Score: 1

      Insufficient, since the mob are quite willing to punish you as a facilitator or enabler,
      if you do not join in the condemnation. "Silence signals support".

      Keeping your head down, is no longer a valid strategy.

      And keeping your professional life away from your private, is EXACTLY what
      the agitators are refusing to do!

      They are witch-hunting, and in the absence of sufficient "perps", they are
      quite willing to burn anyone for their own amusement.

      No Means "No Thanks", not playing.

      --
      (R)ule in Hell or (S)erve in Heaven [R]?
    11. Re:Radical Idea: Just Say No by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      There's no money in that though. Outrage is a massive industry now. I had a quick look on YouTube and there are already dozens of videos about this, most of them just rip-offs of other videos. Want to bet that their conference gets a big crowd funded cash injection from outraged anti-sjws now?

      The only way we are going to get back to normality is to stop funding the outrage. Hopefully people will eventually get tired of it, but I don't see any signs of that. Look at the most popular stories on Slashdot over the past few years.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    12. Re:Radical Idea: Just Say No by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Yes, I agree. Rather than staring at it for 30 minutes she should have just erased it. But Millenials are a bunch of drama queens and most likely she was doing it for social media attention. However, writing that crap on a whiteboard at a conference is inappropriate. There are women present - it isn't a frathouse.

    13. Re:Radical Idea: Just Say No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The best thing to do is not to engage with the perpetually offended types, although in this case she has a point.

      Who cares? Take your own advice.

      People need to grow up.

    14. Re:Radical Idea: Just Say No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Forget to log in to your alt?

    15. Re:Radical Idea: Just Say No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who would write #metoo on a whiteboard next to "boobies"? It is rather disrespectful. People need to grow up.

      Physician: Heal thyself

    16. Re:Radical Idea: Just Say No by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      You were the kid in elementary school who said "but teacher, he did it first! Unfair!", right?

    17. Re:Radical Idea: Just Say No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll bet you a lot of people felt this way when sexual harassment started being recognized as a bad thing in the 1980s.

      Thankfully, those folks didn't carry the day, and we as a culture progressed rather than regressed.

      The same thing is going to happen here. I know it, you know it, and anyone who isn't kidding themselves knows it. George Wallace is not remembered kindly by history. I would suggest not taking after him.

    18. Re:Radical Idea: Just Say No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My friend's ex-wife who was bi-polar was doing this kind of stuff. I got a restraining order. She lived in another state and local authorities couldn't enforce our state laws against another state which didn't have those kinds of laws, but my sheriff had her local sheriff contact her and let her know that any further contact or interference in my life, including via friends, family, and whom I work with, would result in a warrant for her arrest in our state.

      And by our laws, if she didn't turn herself in in a timely manner, she'd also be breaking further laws. I told her that if ever came to this, I would make sure her employer was aware of her arrest warrant, and I know in her profession, she couldn't have any of that. She'd not only lose her job, but would not legally be able to find another job in her profession. I had no issues after that.

    19. Re: Radical Idea: Just Say No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Writing that kind of thing at a PROFESSIONAL conference is inappropriate. Derbycon, Defcon and the like are not multi-thousand dollar employer-paid events. They are done for tech people by tech people because tech people like to get together and talk tech. They also like to relax and have fun. It's important for everyone to keep that in mind when discussing what is and isn't appropriate.

      That's actually a reason why I can't stand the 'must include $ComplainingGroup' at these things because their purpose is primarily social and enjoyment for people for whom highly technical subjects are fun. Nobody has any right to try to force another group of people doing something for their own reasons to change to suit them. A conference held out as a professional one, with professional prices, etc. is in fact different than this sort of thing.

    20. Re:Radical Idea: Just Say No by The_Other_Kelly · · Score: 1

      If I understand your position, you mean:
                It is not the people who protest *everything* who are the problem,
                but instead it is the people who discuss it.

      This smells of the same manipulative bullsh*t as the protestors ...
              "Dissent is simply not tolerated, and there can be no discussion".

      Isn't that exactly the original problem?

      If someone wants a "locked down" conference, then well,
      should they not just go organise one themself?

      --
      (R)ule in Hell or (S)erve in Heaven [R]?
    21. Re:Radical Idea: Just Say No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I agree. Rather than staring at it for 30 minutes she should have just erased it. But Millenials are a bunch of drama queens and most likely she was doing it for social media attention. However, writing that crap on a whiteboard at a conference is inappropriate. There are women present - it isn't a frathouse.

      Except that minor detail that there are plenty of women too that happen to like boobies. Both lesbians and even otherwise - mind blowing, isn't it? Welcome to the 21st century.

      Also there are plenty of women who do not mind at all and/or are even amused by that kind of childish humor. Either of those boobies text could be written by a women (or both) and that metoo text too. I personally know a few women who could do something like that just for fun.

      "There are women present - it isn't a frathouse."

      Excuse me, which past century did you said you are visiting us? Victorian era? Or even earlier?

      Don't know if you have ever met one, let alone talked to even one, but women happen to be as diverse as *gasp* men with their peculiar tastes and quirkiness, nastiness, weird sense of humor etc. (and IF by some miracle you happen to be one then you should well know that pretty well - unless you have lived bottom of one. By yourself. Without any human companions).

      Here in our world women are perfectly capable of forming their own individual opinions. Just. Like. Men. Are. They like different foods, they listen different music, they vote different parties. They do good deeds, they do crimes.

      Women in general are not some delicate flowers who needs smelling salts if they happen to see something unsavory NOR are they some kind of hive mind from the clone factory like you seem to think.

      Yes. they are SOME women who do not like that kind of thing just like there are SOME men who do not like it either. Rest of the population either care or don't (speaking about both sexes). Maybe you should ask a few before you go back to your time.

      In short - you should update your age old stereotypes and stop that sexist BS you are spreading.

    22. Re:Radical Idea: Just Say No by The_Other_Kelly · · Score: 1

      You seem to be an example of this.

      Are you really saying that anyone who fails to pander to the slightest complaint,
      about anything, is equivalent to a sexual harasser or a racist?

      You equate the organisers of a tech congress, with sexist racists,
      unless they police public whiteboards? Really? Really, Really?

      Remember, they *did* wipe the board when it was pointed out!
      Which the complainer could easily have just done herself.

      Or do you believe that women are somehow disadvantaged when it comes to wiping whiteboards?

      What you are calling for, is the impossibility for anyone to write ANYTHING,
      since SOMEONE could write SOMETHING that any motivated individual could find "problematic".

      Let me guess, do you also believe that a content platform *must* police all forum comments?
      Or be boycotted?

      The results of this attitude is exactly what the DerbyCon organisers have pointed out:
              It is no longer possible to function, in such a climate. To the detriment of us all.

      Is it clear to you, what you are asking for? What the consequences are?

      And you do all this smug accusing, as an Anonymous Coward? Obviously.

      It is time for people to start calling people like you out.

      I think of Lenny Bruce, and what his definition of Freedom was.

      --
      (R)ule in Hell or (S)erve in Heaven [R]?
    23. Re:Radical Idea: Just Say No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Back in the 1980s, with sexual harassment, many people heard "it's not okay to make sexual advances in a professional environment" and read into it all sorts of extremes and counter-arguments that completely missed the point (like "Are you saying that my complimenting of her breasts makes me as bad as a rapist??").

      Do you really think this is all going to end in some kind of "SJW dystopia" where no one is allowed to have any fun? (By that, I mean, is that what you *really* *truly* think, rather than what you say you think when commenting online.) I suppose for someone like Don Draper, today's workplace (where you can't just shag your secretary) *is* a sort of dystopia. But everyone else just recognizes that sexual harassment was/is a bad thing that is frowned upon and that you can now be fired for, so they don't do it. There's no battling, there's no debate anymore, that's just the way things are now. We progressed. There's no dystopia, there's no constant walking on eggshells, there's no companies that can't function due to not being able to slap lady co-workers on the bum. There's just... things working the way they should. (With appropriate enforcement mechanisms to *keep* things working the way they should.) At the end of the day, the same thing will happen here.

      The question is, can you see what position you're occupying now, and how the cultural standard is going to shift in the future? Would you really commit to stating this moral/ethical position to someone from fifty years in the future as how things should be, and be confident that you'll be on the right side of history? Inclusiveness, respect, and maturity already have a pretty good track record.

    24. Re:Radical Idea: Just Say No by The_Other_Kelly · · Score: 1

      Yup. You are one of them.

      1. Conflation and false equivalency:
              "In the Past there was an injustice. Unless you agree with me,
                you defend the Past Injustice, and are thus an EVIL person."

      2. SJW Dystopia?
              You mean that for example, technical conferences will be cancelled,
                due to the OUTRAGE of someone writing BOOBIES on a public whiteboard?
              THIS *is* what is happening. People being fired. Payment providers
              blocking. Suicides due to false accusations.
              Demands for people to "apologise" for their skin color?
              Penalty points to mark down applicants to University or Employment
              based again on intrinsic attributes, beyond people's control.
              A world where people like you, believe that it is NOT the content
              of one's character, nor the actions or intentions, but ONLY group
              membership. Where the Group is not decided by choice.
              Self-righteous, sexist, racist bigots, demanding control of everything,
              without any mercy, sympathy, nuance or often basic understanding
              of history.

      3. Position?
              I spent my life standing up for what is right, often with serious personal cost.
              I insist on my, (and your), right to speak, to listen and to choose.
              For the right NOT to walk, as the Dead Poet's Society said.

              In the past that meant facing down the Right, the powerful and injustice.

              Now it means facing people like you down. So be it.

      NO.

      You do not decide what the Position "should" be.
      Principles, morals and ethics will do that.

      I *demand* a world where everyone is judged on their actions, in the context
      of the information available at the time. Where laws are decided by
      democratically elected officials, with respect to the rights of minorities.

      Justice. Democracy. Rule of Law. Pursuit of Knowledge. Equal Treatment.
      The Enlightenment Values.

      Tempered by mercy, compassion and a deep respect for the preciousness of
      every single life. An appreciation for the sheer challenge of living.

      If you and your kind see that as a problem, then I see you as something
      to confront, and to oppose. With discourse, example and courage.

      And with Resolve.

      Perhaps surprisingly, even with respect due to your misguidedness.

      --
      (R)ule in Hell or (S)erve in Heaven [R]?
    25. Re:Radical Idea: Just Say No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Yes, I agree. Rather than staring at it for 30 minutes she should have just erased it. But Millenials are a bunch of drama queens and most likely she was doing it for social media attention. However, writing that crap on a whiteboard at a conference is inappropriate. There are women present - it isn't a frathouse."

      Except that minor detail that there are plenty of women too that happen to like boobies. Both lesbians and even otherwise - mind blowing, isn't it? Welcome to the 21st century.

      Also there are plenty of women who do not mind at all and/or are even amused by that kind of childish humor. Either of those boobies text could be written by a women (or both) and that metoo text too. I personally know a few women who could do something like that just for fun.

      "There are women present - it isn't a frathouse."

      Excuse me, which past century did you said you are visiting us? Victorian era? Or even earlier?

      Don't know if you have ever met one, let alone talked to even one, but women happen to be as diverse as *gasp* men with their peculiar tastes and quirkiness, nastiness, weird sense of humor etc. (and IF by some miracle you happen to be one then you should well know that pretty well - unless you have lived bottom of one. By yourself. Without any human companions).

      Here in our world women are perfectly capable of forming their own individual opinions. Just. Like. Men. Are. They like different foods, they listen different music, they vote different parties. They do good deeds, they do crimes.

      Women in general are not some delicate flowers who needs smelling salts if they happen to see something unsavory NOR are they some kind of hive mind from the clone factory like you seem to think.

      Yes. they are SOME women who do not like that kind of thing just like there are SOME men who do not like it either. Rest of the population either care or don't (speaking about both sexes). Maybe you should ask a few before you go back to your time.

      In short - you should update your age old stereotypes and stop that sexist BS you are spreading.

  22. I agree! by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

    I agree!

    In fact, I agree so strongly that I intend to protest about it, and be mollified by nothing!!

  23. You "may" be the problem too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd like to give an example that will show everyone how much they fear and still side with SJWs despite things like this happening.

    Bret Kavanaugh: Accused by 3 women of sexual harassment, 2 of them admitted they lied about it. Dr. Ford lied at least 15 times in her under oath testimony in the Senate about him (provably) and with no other witnesses or evidence she was not credible (and could still be charged. but won't be).

    Bill Clinton: Raped a woman, told his AG to not prosecute and since then has yet to be charged/questioned about it.

    If you think I am a whacko for pointing this out and think Kavanaugh is a bad guy and Clinton is a good guy, congratulations you are with the SJWs. People think its all about #meToo or sexual harassment or other things, its not. You either spout correct "group think" or you are evil no matter what. They have no issue attacking gays, blacks, other minorities etc. as long as they support the wrong side they are wrong no matter their identity (Diamond and Silk, Candice Owens, Milo Y, etc)

    So if you support a rapist (Clinton) and think a good guy (Kavanaugh) is evil, you are still with them. Either from fear or you are truly one of them. We are a long way from fixing this as long as we can give passes to rapists and destroy guys who literally did nothing wrong other than think the wrong way.

  24. This world is batshiat useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothing but downward spirals and moral traps. Damned if you do, damned if you don't - well damn the whole lot of humanity. Engineered stupidity. What the f*ck is the point of this dumbass existence if everyone's sole driver is to be a piece of shit on behalf of other pieces of shit?

  25. DerbyCon by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    The Conference for Horses.

    Was my first thought.

  26. Re:DerbyCon by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

    Uh...please have that second cup of coffee. DerbyCon is held in Louisville, Kentucky, home to Churchill Downs, which is a famous horse racing complex that hosts the famous "Kentucky Derby" horse race. So...er...yeah, "DerbyCon" is meant to be a play on "the place with the horses".

  27. Re:DerbyCon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe you're thinking of DerpyCon?

  28. The Only Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Never apologize. As Kevin Hart has discovered to his own chagrin, the SJW outrage masters will never be happy with any apology. You have to keep apologizing over and over; giving more ground; begging to be exonerated from a group that will never be satisfied. They want nothing less than your total humiliation and utter destruction. It should be obvious to even the most dimwitted appeaser.

    Back in the 70s, the policy was NEVER to negotiate with terrorists no matter what the immediate threat and potential collateral damage may be. Success only emboldens the terrorists to strike again and again to demand many more pounds of flesh. Never apologize to a SJW. Ignore them. Block them. Disinvite them. Give them the middle finger. It may be hard in the short term but it's the only way to ever restore peace and normalcy.

  29. " or making the industry better." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    there ya have what all these hackers cons are really about CORPORATE STEALING OF KIDS IDEAS FOR FREE

    fuck em all ..........from
    Chronoss

  30. At least Dave had the Balls to address it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The whole Derby team was lovingly supported by swaths of well meaning and inclusive companies and groups, yes mainly comprised of men. This doesn't make it's core culture this patriarchal blanket of abuse and oppression against women or minorities.

    Never in the 8 years that I have attended or the 20+ years on the scene with many of these people did I play a party to or see oppressive white male-centric behavior keep others out.If behaviors kept people out it was because they chose to be offended and to that I say good riddance.

    The SJW botnet has gotten out of control and I lay it's rise and dominance at the feet of organizers of conferences such as Derbycon. Sure it's bad press to publicly tell SJWs to piss off because then they'll brand the conference inherently aggressive or racist but at the same time the odds of survival for the organization are much higher than the job or personal life of the individual who might have made an out of time joke or worse yet, was acting like the *gasp* juvenile person that attends the convention as he/she/it/them had since their teens and if the conference and their friends are it's outlet, who is any one else to try to destroy their life for it?

    There were people in 01' - 05' who attended many conferences warning organizers and panel members that the choice between equality or freedom would be the single largest single point and possible detriment to the scene and it's future. Looks like they were right.

    The worst part is that trusted members of the community contributed to the chaos to save public face. Deviant Ollam comes to mind. He spent YEARS around Defcon Alum, hosting and attending parties, keeping company with a rotating cast of people, many not fit for polite company and surely not the type you'd take to family gatherings. He swiftly got this reputation for whereas keeping perplexing company was reasonable and fair and this got him many eyes and ears (=money) at whatever conference he would attend.

    In the last 4 years he has taken company with almost the polar opposite group now that the tables are turned and will frequently draw outrage to any one who dares in his mind to be racist or sexist (still hangs out with Machine Gun Kelly), going so far as to stoke hordes of Feminists (Uses his wife) against people he as recent as a couple years ago would have called friend all to save face and make a buck!
    Deviant is a good knowable example of this but surely not the only one who has recently developed a curious sense of amnesia since the nonsense had started. I suppose he's trying to get ahead of any of his own #metoos start to shake out of the tree in order to insulate that sham of a non for profit he runs.

    I guess all I really mean to say is that it looks like the security scene got owned from the inside and the social virus prevails, it's a shame and I wish it were different. New things are coming, they are all as a result going to be invite only, exclusive and elitist and above all else:

    It's

    All

    Your

    Fault!

    1. Re: At least Dave had the Balls to address it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Derbycon used to be a lot more inclusive. Derbycon used to have it all female performance troupe made up racially diverse women. But that came to an end when the organizer came out as a Trump supporter. so, while Dave and some other people did have the best of intentions they should have had staff that wasn't guided by political hate.
      when a conference is more concerned about who somebody supports politically or about the fact that a nonbinary individual wearing a maga hat might be too edgy - they became exactly what the claimed not to be. From that point on things just continue to deteriorate.
      Or when the conference continues to support an organizer who had a reputation for threatening women and did so while on staff. Then the individual railroads victims of sexual assault and uses his influence at the convention to sabotage the careers of numerous victims, derbycon is definitely white male centric culture. They might have put in a valiant effort not to be but, that failed by 2015 and the negatives of the personalities if many of their staff were continually allowed to flourish.
      But you can't expect Dave to throw his best friends under the bus for the things they have done in his name. So, he's going to kill the convention in hopes it goes away

    2. Re: At least Dave had the Balls to address it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhm, the leader of the mostly female group is a Trump supporter DJCyFi, you are full of shit.

    3. Re: At least Dave had the Balls to address it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      âoeDave and some other people did have the best of intentions they should have had staff that wasn't guided by political hate.
      when a conference is more concerned about who somebody supports politically or about the fact that a nonbinary individual wearing a maga hat might be too edgy - they became exactly what the claimed not to be. From that point on things just continue to deteriorate.â

      Do you realize how ironic your point is? Somehow InfoSec is now fully emerged in the culture war as well as political hate towards those that do not buy into the progressive ideology. It should be that way. Inclusivity is the only way to get out of this mess and I mean that ideological diversity it key. Stop letting the bullies and twitter mobs ruin our scene.

      Also who was the organizer you claim is a MAGA supporter, not that should matter, nor should the racial makeup of the attendees. As someone of mixed race, this shit is getting old.

  31. Drunken party - drunken behavior by pierceelevated · · Score: 1

    I went to the first few DerbyCons, and there was a lot of drinking. At the last one I attended, so many people (including the presenters) were drunk after lunch that I left. I don't know if David is primarily referring to the markerboard incident, but if you throw a drunken party, you're going to get drunken behavior.

    1. Re:Drunken party - drunken behavior by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And there is nothing wrong with that if everyone understands that.

  32. It's called TTP (Time to penis) by raymorris · · Score: 3, Insightful

    > But this is the point. If you leave a whiteboard somewhere, it is likely that someone will write something on it. Maybe interesting, probably not, potentially offensive.

    If you invite people to write / draw whatever, some idiot will draw a penis. How long it takes before someone draws a penis in different situations is a measurable quantity known as TTP, time to penis.

    An area for further study is TTPE, time to penis erasure. This is how long after the penis is drawn until some reasonable person comes by and erases it.

    Recently we've been seeing an inversion. TTPE is sometimes higher (longer time) than TTSJW, meaning a whack job has the opportunity to see it and go insane prior to a reasonable person erasing it.

    1. Re:It's called TTP (Time to penis) by The_Other_Kelly · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Thank you!

      Instead of Time-to-first-crate, we now have a new metric:
                              TTP:TTPE

      I am so tempted to put a camera and a whiteboard somewhere,
      and start collecting the data!

      Applied Statistics.

      --
      (R)ule in Hell or (S)erve in Heaven [R]?
  33. Devient Ollum and TOOOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is the biggest boys club there is and they led the charge on derbycon!

  34. Thanks Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For fucking up the internet. Hope you're happy.

  35. Well at least this wasn't blamed on Donald Trump.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..or Barack Obama!

  36. Re:DerbyCon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had to read TFA to figure out why it was called DerbyCon, I misread it was DerpyCon and automatically assumed it was for Bronies. If the Slashdot snippet said anything about Louisville or Kentucky, this could have been avoided.

  37. Sounds to me like the Con got Conned. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You gotta admit, the SJWs totally have the upper hand on social engineering. We need to up our game if we're going to defend against their methods in the future.