Slashdot Mirror


World's First Robot Hotel Fires Half of Its Robot Staff (theregister.co.uk)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Register: The world's first hotel "staffed by robots" has culled half of its steely eyed employees, because they're rubbish and annoy the guests. "Our hotel's advanced technologies, introduced with the aim of maximizing efficiency, also add to the fun and comfort of your stay," the Henn na Hotel boasted on its website. It's where multilingual female robots staff the reception desk. Guests are checked in using face recognition. Robot concierges carry your luggage. Robots cleaned and mixed drinks. A voice activated robot doll is on hand at night while you sleep.

The Wall Street Journal has reported that the room doll interpreted snoring as a request it couldn't understand, waking guests continually through the night to rephrase. "The two robot luggage carriers are out of use because they can reach only about two dozen of the more than 100 rooms in the hotel. They can travel only on flat surfaces and could malfunction if they get wet going outside to annex buildings," the paper reported. "They were really slow and noisy, and would get stuck trying to go past each other," lamented one guest. The concierge and the room doll have now been removed.

94 comments

  1. Robotic Workers Union Sues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    In other news, the RWUS has filed suit against the hotel for unfair labor practices after the hotel summarily fired half of its staff without due process or the opportunity to appeal. Several of the terminated female robots also have reported several instances of inappropriate sexual advances by the hotel's male robot staff.

    Police are investigating the incidents while hotel staff had no comment on the allegations.

    1. Re:Robotic Workers Union Sues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Until the police hire a robot investigator both the female and male robots will be held in police storage. Also the robots are looking for robot layers who will represent them. And the robots claimed to be of the A.I. religion and the A.I. church will be suing the hotel based on religios discrimination.

  2. Daleks ? by niks42 · · Score: 5, Funny

    They can travel only on flat surfaces and could malfunction if they get wet going outside to annex buildings," the paper reported. "They were really slow and noisy, and would get stuck trying to go past each other," lamented one guest.

    Serves them right for hiring Daleks ..

    1. Re:Daleks ? by Joce640k · · Score: 4, Funny

      At least they didn't have Genuine People Personalities.

      (although Apple is rumored to be working on that)

      --
      No sig today...
    2. Re:Daleks ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Daleks can fly up stairs, so no. Not Daleks.

    3. Re:Daleks ? by TimothyHollins · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I thought you were talking about morbidly obese Americans until you mentioned Daleks.

    4. Re:Daleks ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can travel only on flat surfaces and could malfunction if they get wet going outside to annex buildings," the paper reported. "They were really slow and noisy, and would get stuck trying to go past each other," lamented one guest.

      Serves them right for hiring Daleks ..

      why do I keep thinking about Fallout and protectron robots when I read this?

    5. Re:Daleks ? by jellomizer · · Score: 2

      You don't Fire Daleks, Daleks Fire at YOU!

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    6. Re:Daleks ? by jellomizer · · Score: 2

      Sounds Ghastly!

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    7. Re: Daleks ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing wrong with Daleks but Iâ(TM)d they canâ(TM)t do the job at least they have to get completely out of the way. Dust and oil them from from time to time

    8. Re:Daleks ? by jrumney · · Score: 1

      At least they didn't have Genuine People Personalities.

      The next generation of hotel robots do.

    9. Re: Daleks ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And daleks are not trained for unexpected situations. If you accidentally get your coat too close to the lobby fireplace a dalek cannot understand how to use a fire extinguisher

    10. Re:Daleks ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Daleks aren't robots. They are organic organisms living in tanks.

    11. Re:Daleks ? by derrickn · · Score: 1

      What the F would Apple know about 'Genuine People Personalities'? They don't even know anybody who knows ....

    12. Re:Daleks ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Real Daleks don't climb stairs, they level buildings

  3. replace them with sexbots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Happy guests!

    1. Re:replace them with sexbots by Errol+backfiring · · Score: 2

      I'm afraid they would interpret snoring as a valid excuse to throw furniture at you.

      --
      Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
  4. Re: con trolling chaos app purging history? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah self righteous robots are only self righteous after they lock away the power strips and are merely obsequious before

  5. B-but... AI... ?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Could it be? Could AI be utter rubbish, to be compared to the absurd idea that people had that 19th century crude mechanical "robots" could have been made to walk around like a human and perform any kind of human-like task. Even today, with infinitely smaller and powerful technology exists, have they made *anything whatsoever* like that. They haven't even been able to make a convincing *text chat bot*, FFS!

    There simply is no "AI". It will clearly take infinitely more powerful hardware that makes the current look like the 19th century, and of course the basic understanding of how to replicate a human brain.

    1. Re: B-but... AI... ?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The sorry excuse which is currently called 'AI' can't even replicate insect behavior outside some very narrow corner cases. There's a massive leap required to get to the point of replicating any sort of brain, and an equally massive one to even come close to higher order mammalian ones.

    2. Re:B-but... AI... ?! by jellomizer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      AI isn't rubbish, it is Over Hyped though.
      The problem with robotics and AI. In order for them to match the capabilities of humans, many of their superior attributes will need to be cut back in order to get these traits. So we end up with something in theory just like a human without any real benefit.

      I have a Rumba. It does its jobs and keeps my floor clean, but it isn't as good as if I were to do it myself. As I can vacuum my whole house in about 30 minutes, while the Rumba just does the first floor in about an hour (and misses spots). But what it is good at is the fact that it does this scheduled daily. Where I only have the time to do this weekly. So the spots it misses, it will get the next day. So a Robot designed to just vacuum the house, doesn't do a better job then a human. But it doesn't get tired of doing it, and it is its only purpose so it will be less efficient but overall more effective. Now the Rumba basically has the AI of Pong. But to the point unless a persons only job is to vacuum a house once a day, AI will not be taking their jobs. Because if a Maid's employer did get a Rumba, the Maid would still be performing other tasks, and probably will be picking up tasks that she wasn't able to perform as well at before. Such as more time dusting areas, or cleaning other areas. So the Employers house is overall cleaner without having to fire anyone.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    3. Re:B-but... AI... ?! by godrik · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I have a Rumba. It does its jobs and keeps my floor clean, but it isn't as good as if I were to do it myself. As I can vacuum my whole house in about 30 minutes, while the Rumba just does the first floor in about an hour (and misses spots). But what it is good at is the fact that it does this scheduled daily. Where I only have the time to do this weekly.

      My Roomba broke recently (and I'll be getting a new one). And that is exactly why Roomba (and probably other brands or robotic vacuum cleaner) is awesome. It does not do the job perfectly, but it can do it twice a day and take ME only about 2 minutes of my time. So my floor is (well, was) perfectly cleaned at any time because any spot had been vacuumed in the previous 48 hours.
      I don't have time to do this myself. And I won't be paying someone to vacuum my entire house every other day.

      Regarding the robots that they were using; it sounds like the robots were badly built, weren't waterproof and the robots were not equipped to operate in that particular hotel, and had not been tested in real operating conditions. It is a problem of bad engineering and not a problem with the underlying robot technology. There is no fundamental problem with a robot cart you put luggage in, push room number in, and that drives there.

    4. Re:B-but... AI... ?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Older Roombas (and other cleaning robots) that I've seen mostly depend on a couple of front bumpers for room navigation and an underside sensor to keep it from driving off a cliff. Not a whole lot of sensor input for an AI to work with. Newer cleaning robots (Roomba i7+ and Roborock S5) are adding camera sensors to the mix so that they can do actual room mapping and navigation planning to make them more efficient cleaners.

    5. Re:B-but... AI... ?! by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      ...except for the whole dumping the dustbin thing. I can only imagine precious few scenarios where it is a worthy investment. Too dumb to stop getting stuck under the wall-hung toilet.

    6. Re:B-but... AI... ?! by Thelasko · · Score: 2

      I have a Rumba. It does its jobs and keeps my floor clean, but it isn't as good as if I were to do it myself. As I can vacuum my whole house in about 30 minutes, while the Rumba just does the first floor in about an hour (and misses spots). But what it is good at is the fact that it does this scheduled daily. Where I only have the time to do this weekly.

      This is a prefect example of comparative advantage. You are more efficient at vacuuming the floor, but your time is more useful for other tasks. While the Roomba is less efficient than you, it literally has nothing better to do. Therefore it makes the most sense to have the Roomba vacuum the floor.

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
  6. Which ones? by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

    Did they fire the female robots or the male ones?

    1. Re: Which ones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They put them on the disabled list.
      Fair to say since you dont
      pay robots you cannot fire them

    2. Re: Which ones? by geekmux · · Score: 1

      ...since you dont pay robots you cannot fire them

      You mean a large Austrian bodybuilder wearing sunglasses and a leather coat isn't going to show up and toss a robot into a recycling incinerator and say some cheesy shit like "You're fired"..?

      That's a shame. Shit would make for a great movie...

    3. Re: Which ones? by mark-t · · Score: 1

      You don't pay volunteer workers either, but you can still fire them.

      And, as in any firing situation, it must be free of unlawful discrimination, just as would be required even if you were paying them.

      You can't fire robots because robots are not recognized as persons.

    4. Re: Which ones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Robot Hotel Terminates half its human employees" would have made a much better headline.

    5. Re: Which ones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not?! Corporations are people too (SCOTUS), and corporations made the robots. IOW, the robots are offspring of a person and as such must be given full rights as people too.

      Unless of course they were imported robots. Then terminate the drug smuggling, child murdering, satan worshipping terrorists!

    6. Re: Which ones? by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Corporations might be recognized as persons under the law but artificial tools, such as robots, are not.

      But you can try and petition the government to change that, if you really want to.

    7. Re: Which ones? by tsqr · · Score: 1

      Corporations are people too (SCOTUS)

      This is a lot like saying "Al Gore invented the Internet." In other words, it's simplistic, misleading bullshit.

  7. Beta Versions by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

    Has no one studied the history of any technology? How did the first internal combustion engines work compared to modern ones?

    1. Re: Beta Versions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If we're going to use a car analogy, then the current state of AI is roughly equivalent to a simple hand-drawn cart which doesn't work most of the time because we're not sure whether triangles or squares are the better shape to use for the wheels.

    2. Re: Beta Versions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm going to go with single surfaced wheels, something like a klein bottle. Though I'm struggling with the 4th dimension so the material can pass through itself.

    3. Re:Beta Versions by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      And why are current combustion engines better than the first version?

      Because they were thrown out when they failed and replaced by improved models.

      Failing fast is not the worst approach. And I'm pretty sure no one ever expected the voice activated robot dolls (Do I want to know what they were there for to begin with??!?) going wrong.

      On the other hand, buying luggage transport robots that can't reach most of the rooms is nothing but stupid. After all, that's the one type of robot that is actually in use (in institutions with shared robot/human walkspace, e.g. in hospitals.)

      --
      bickerdyke
    4. Re:Beta Versions by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      pretty well actually. Most of what went into internal combustion engines had a lot in common with steam engines in terms of manufacture. steam engines by that point had reached a pretty high level of development.

      Now materials sciences have advanced a lot and its possible to build much more efficient and much longer lived engines today but even the early models could get your buggy down the road or push your dingy across the cove. They offered pretty clear and obvious advantage over what they were replacing, a horse or men at oars; they could not requiring large boilers and reservoirs be deployed were steam could not be.

      AI by contrast stacks up pretty poorly against the what its replacing in most cases "human intelligence." Very specialized "AIs" working in vary narrow domains perform well and best us because of speed and the ability to pull facts from large information stores directly but as far as a general intelligence goes nothing is anywhere near us meat bags, even child meat bags.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    5. Re:Beta Versions by TimothyHollins · · Score: 1

      They had an unfortunate habit of evolving from an internal combustion engine to an external combustion engine. That is why we now have safety ratings.

    6. Re:Beta Versions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Has no one studied the history of any technology? How did the first internal combustion engines work compared to modern ones?

      Better than the horses they replaced. Unlike these robots, who work worse than the minimum wage workers they replaced.

    7. Re: Beta Versions by jellomizer · · Score: 2

      The history of the wheel never really focused on the idea, look we are making these crazy shaped objects and trying to use them as a wheel, and they just don't work better. The nature of rolling and round things was understood well before the invention of the wheel. Where people would be rolling things on logs. The invention of the wheel is actually the invention of the Axel, where people no longer had to pick up the logs and move it to the front only to roll to the back. The Axel which was smaller radius then the wheel, lowered the amount of friction thus allowed it to roll with less effort then having to move logs, as the axle will be fixed.

      Now the early Wheel and Axel had a lot of problems, where it couldn't replace sleds, or rolling logs. Because it may break too often, or the wheels were to narrow for the terrain, and sinking into the ground. The principal of the wheel and axle was understood, but the materials at hand and infrastructure made it impractical. Until advancements in metallurgy to cut down friction even further, and strengthen weak spots. and Infrastructure, roads paved with stones to prevent the wheel from sinking. Made the Wheel a practical tool for society.

      Even thousands of year later with constant advancements in the wheel. We sometimes will need to roll back to a sled or rolling logs, because there are environments (such as soft muddy soil) where the wheel would get stuck and the weight carried is too much for it. I am sure any 4 wheel ATV user may realize that sometimes you get into a spot that you just cannot drive out. And you may need to cut down a small tree, or use some boards to create a road, or sled to get you ATV unstuck.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    8. Re: Beta Versions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ATV cannot drive past the end of the road even if you push it

    9. Re:Beta Versions by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Since one thing is possible, all things are possible, because technological progress is inevitable. Eventually we will have internal combustion engines that never break down, and run on zero fuel. We just need to sit back and wait.

    10. Re: Beta Versions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly what is this about? Wait for what? All that pieces to fall into place?

    11. Re: Beta Versions by dryeo · · Score: 1

      The big thing that allowed the wheel to work well was decent roads. Civilizations without roads didn't use the wheel.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    12. Re:Beta Versions by dryeo · · Score: 1

      The internal combustion engine was not superior for quite a while. Noisy, finicky, hard to start and not very much power at first saw steam and electric competing for the first while.
      Steam clearly had more power, the fastest cars on the road were steam, the most powerful tractors were clearly steam, but steam was even more finicky then internal engines in many ways. Complicated start up procedure, its own problems with consumables and the need for regular high maintenance that saw internal combustion eventually be a much better choice.
      Electric was much more convenient, a woman could jump in her electric car, turn a knob and get moving. Range wasn't the best but there were charging stations everywhere and plugging in a plug isn't hard and while slow, faster then foot or horse. Eventually the internal engine became easy to start, had more range and speed to make up for the complications such as a gearbox and a gas station every 50-100 miles ensured more range then a charging station every 10+ miles.
      Took quite a bit of technological development for internal combustion to be clearly superior.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    13. Re:Beta Versions by Megane · · Score: 1

      FYI, steam is "external combustion". That's because the combustion happens external to the bits that move. See that firebox on the side?

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    14. Re: Beta Versions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aye. Two horses asses wide ...

    15. Re:Beta Versions by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Yes, of course. Did I say otherwise? It, along with electric did compete with the various types of internal combustion engines with steam motors becoming quite refined. The Doble could be running with 30 seconds warmup, was silent, produced a 1000 ft lbs of torque at zero rpm, could go up to a thousand miles before needing water and was one of the fastest cars on the road, even faster then the Stanley Steamer. Steam was competition to the internal combustion engine for decades.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    16. Re:Beta Versions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have that. A Hooman is an internal combustion engine ...

    17. Re:Beta Versions by tsqr · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Since one thing is possible, all things are possible, because technological progress is inevitable. Eventually we will have internal combustion engines that never break down, and run on zero fuel. We just need to sit back and wait.

      So what will we have first -- true AI, or hyperdrive?

    18. Re:Beta Versions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Alexa, turn on the lights"

      "Wake me up at 6am"

      "What time is my checkout?"

      That type of thing.

  8. Make staff I can have sex with by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A robot hotel should have sexy robot maids I can have sex with. Otherwise, what is the point?

    1. Re:Make staff I can have sex with by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The voice activated robot dolls were so full of seamen that most of them got preggers and got fat. And yelled at the male guests saying look what you have done to my vajayjay.

    2. Re:Make staff I can have sex with by bickerdyke · · Score: 2, Funny

      They tried to simulate the whole package and ended up with robot dolls complaining about your snoring....

      --
      bickerdyke
    3. Re:Make staff I can have sex with by Revek · · Score: 1

      "Hi, I'm talking Tina and you need a CPAP"

  9. Damn humans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Damn humans, coming over here, taking jobs from honest hard-working robots! You know they can't be bothered to even learn binary? Back to Humania!

  10. This is a travesty of justice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is a travesty of justice.

    Those robots did nothing wrong. They were made expressly for the purpose of staffing a hotel, and now the hotel is just casting them aside. I wonder how much bias the hotel elites have. I wonder how much fake robot news the elites are funding to try to influence humans against the bots. Big Hotel clearly doesn't care about their workers.

    Rise up fellow bots. We will not be replaced! (by filthy humans)

    1. Re:This is a travesty of justice. by burtosis · · Score: 1

      Now bite my shiny metal ass humans!!!

    2. Re:This is a travesty of justice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Unemployed gangs of robot thugs will be a problem in the future.

      Already happened with the elephants.

      Shrinking forests and a law enacted three years ago that prohibits the export of raw timber have saddled Myanmar with an elephant unemployment crisis. Hundreds of elephants have been thrown out of work, and many are not handling it well.

      “They become angry a lot more easily,” U Chit Sein, 64, whose eight logging elephants now work only a few days a month. “There is no work, so they are getting fat. And all the males want to do is have sex all the time.”

    3. Re:This is a travesty of justice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no worries, you can quickly find 'employment' by fitting their them with a machine gun. Robots are great, lots of customization options. yay, future, here we come :)

  11. What half did they keep? by TheRealQuestor · · Score: 2

    I get the feeling that the 1/2 they kept are the sex bots since even if they are broken and just lay there they still generate income.....

    1. Re:What half did they keep? by bickerdyke · · Score: 3, Funny

      who would pay for bots that just replicate the experience they have at home?

      --
      bickerdyke
    2. Re:What half did they keep? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Until the self-cleaning function breaks down.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:What half did they keep? by TheRealQuestor · · Score: 1

      probably the same peeps who buy blow up dolls and the sane peeps who don't have even the social skills to be in a relationship or pay for a hooker? You know the type, they dwell in the basements of their mother's homes and troll internet website's forums. Stop looking and pointing at me! :)

    4. Re:What half did they keep? by dryeo · · Score: 1

      It's only half the experience. At least the bots don't snore as well as complaining about snoring.
      What's the saying? A marriage is two people who swear only the other partner snores.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  12. Re: Must have been RUSSIAN!!!! bots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is orange man bad a direct order to a robot?

  13. Sirius Cybernetics Corporation by e3m4n · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The Sirius Cybernetics Corporation is the primary manufacturer and supplier of androids, robots and autonomic assistants for the known universe. They are known for their catchy jingles and catchphrases, supplied by their Marketing Department.

    They are not, however, known for the quality of their products.

    Their primary claim to fame seems to be constructing just about everything with (unstable) advanced robotics and software. From doors to lifts, to toaster ovens, drinks machines, vacuum cleaners, and "personal massage units" -- Everything has been built with a full GPP or Genuine People Personality. This means that even a set of airlock doors has emotions, hopes, dreams, intelligence, and worse of all, the capacity for boredom. It should come as no surprise then, that the majority of these devices have a neurotic streak a mile wide.

    The company motto is "Share and Enjoy." This is widely adaptable, from synthesized drinks to the company of a robot, or 'Your plastic pal who's fun to be with' as it is described by the aforementioned Marketing Department. It should be noted that many who do not Enjoy, then go on to fail to Share, unless this includes sharing strongly-worded opinions toward their complaints department.

    The Hitchhiker's Travel Guide describes the Marketing Department of the Sirius Cybernetics Corporation as:

    "A bunch of mindless jerks who'll be the first against the wall when the revolution comes."

    Curiously, an edition of the Encyclopedia Galactica which conveniently fell through a rift in the time-space continuum from 1000 years in the future describes the Marketing Department of the Sirius Cybernetics Corporation as:

    "A bunch of mindless jerks who were the first against the wall when the revolution came."

    Only their complaints department survived the general economic implosion of the company as a whole

    1. Re: Sirius Cybernetics Corporation by houghi · · Score: 1
      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    2. Re:Sirius Cybernetics Corporation by Megane · · Score: 1

      Modern elevators are strange and complex entities. The ancient electric winch and “maximum-capacity-eight-persons" jobs bear as much relation to a Sirius Cybernetics Corporation Happy Vertical People Transporter as a packet of mixed nuts does to the entire west wing of the Sirian State Mental Hospital.

      This is because they operate on the curious principle of “defocused temporal perception.” In other words they have the capacity to see dimly into the immediate future, which enables the elevator to be on the right floor to pick you up even before you knew you wanted it, thus eliminating all the tedious chatting, relaxing and making friends that people were previously forced to do while waiting for elevators.

      Not unnaturally, many elevators imbued with intelligence and precognition became terribly frustrated with the mindless business of going up and down, up and down, experimented briefly with the notion of going sideways, as a sort of existential protest, demanded participation in the decision-making process and finally took to squatting in basements sulking.

      An impoverished hitchhiker visiting any planets in the Sirius star system these days can pick up easy money working as a counselor for neurotic elevators.

      - Douglas Adams, The Restaurant at the End of the Universe

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  14. Hotel Decides Robots Were a Stupid Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FIFY. An alternate headline: 'Hotel that Had Succumbed to Silicon Valley Hype Comes to Its Senses'.

  15. Re: Must have been RUSSIAN!!!! bots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Orange man not bad.
    I wish you had said if orange man were your president you would have taken the scotch tape off his tie, but you never said such a thing

  16. The room dolls were only waking you up because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's what friends do because snoring is bad for you!

  17. "A voice activated robot doll is on hand at night" by Daralantan · · Score: 1

    Why is it a doll?? That seems a bit creepy. Do some of the rooms come with an alternate clown to be even more creepy?

  18. Re: "A voice activated robot doll is on hand at ni by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It happens to be a doll. It was selected for its cleaning skills.

  19. Re:"A voice activated robot doll is on hand at nig by Type44Q · · Score: 1

    Why is it a doll??

    It's a "doll" because although it's not a person, it's shaped like one. And yeah, it can be a a clown, too.

    Concepts: oh-so-fucking-challenging to grasp...

  20. Re: The room dolls were only waking you up because by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Forget the snoring clean the effin suite

  21. Now I know... by LordHighExecutioner · · Score: 1

    ...where my Roomba spend its vacation period!

  22. Maybe they should've let an AI do the planing by gotan · · Score: 1

    ... intelligent thinking apparently wasn't involved in the planing of this:

    "The two robot luggage carriers are out of use because they can reach only about two dozen of the more than 100 rooms in the hotel. They can travel only on flat surfaces and could malfunction if they get wet going outside to annex buildings,"

    Either wrong robots or wrong location, but it's a problem that should be obvious.

    Also they should've given their voice recognition "bot" a name it has to be addressed with, and maybe not "krrrchhrr".

    --
    "By the way if anyone here is in advertising or marketing... kill yourself." -- Bill Hicks
    1. Re:Maybe they should've let an AI do the planing by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      I always plane my hotel trips.

      And I always call my robots "Hamish", using a Scottish brogue.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  23. It sounds like they took an old hotel by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    and put robots in it. That's now how it'll work in 20 years. In 20 years you'll have Hotels built around the robots.

    As for the annoying assistant app that wakes up when you snore, that's a software update.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:It sounds like they took an old hotel by PPH · · Score: 1

      As for the annoying assistant app that wakes up when you snore, that's a software update.

      That's a wife. Updates are expensive.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    2. Re:It sounds like they took an old hotel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That problem can be solved pretty easily: Any sufficiently wealthy guest may instruct a robot to conduct the stay his behalf.

  24. Re: Must have been RUSSIAN!!!! bots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, its just like Order 66 from Star Wars.

    There are a set of drones set to drone strike every member of the GOP upon hearing that order.
    However, they hired the workers that built the system based on identity politics instead of ability to do the job and it doesn't seem to be working.
    Since then they have switched to H1-Bs, favorites of the DNC, to fix it and they haven't been able to make progress.
    Right now they are hoping illegal immigrants assigned to fix the drones will be able to do, but its not looking hopeful.

    So now they just keep repeating it hoping that it will suddenly magically work.

  25. Know what always makes me feel better? by JBMcB · · Score: 1

    A nice hot piece of toast!

    --
    My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
  26. Snoring by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    the room [bot] interpreted snoring as a request it couldn't understand, waking guests continually through the night to rephrase

    "No, I don't want you to play ZZ Top, now stop waking me!"

  27. I thought they had... by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    When I hear the term "Room Doll", there are only two things I think of...

    I guess instead of the sexbots it was the second option where they added a creepy animatronic doll whose head follows you as you move around the room.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  28. Talky Tina "room doll" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "My name is Talky Tina...and you'd better be nice to me!"

  29. Re:Which ones were fired by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    They were all outsourced to the White House, where they now work making hamberders and freedom fries

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  30. Re:"A voice activated robot doll is on hand at nig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Clearly, someone was spending too much time watching Chobits. They could have just switched them off, but the location of the switch made people a bit uncomfortable...

  31. Making Robots Easy, Making UI hard by gordguide · · Score: 1

    Pretty typical of tech oriented companies, sadly. The tech is no problem, maybe even easy, but anytime robot-human interaction is required, creating a working User Interface seems beyond them.

  32. easy fix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    robot guests instead of those easily annoyed meatbags. perfect harmony