Slashdot Mirror


New Satellite Network Will Make It Impossible For a Commercial Airplane To Vanish (cbsnews.com)

pgmrdlm quotes a report from CBS News: For the first time, a new network of satellites will soon be able to track all commercial airplanes in real time, anywhere on the planet. Currently, planes are largely tracked by radar on the ground, which doesn't work over much of the world's oceans. The final 10 satellites were launched Friday to wrap up the $3 billion effort to replace 66 aging communication satellites, reports CBS News' Kris Van Cleave, who got an early look at the new technology.

On any given day, 43,000 planes are in the sky in America alone. When these planes take off, they are tracked by radar and are equipped with a GPS transponder. All commercial flights operating in the U.S. and Europe have to have them by 2020. It's that transponder that talks to these new satellites, making it possible to know exactly where more than 10,000 flights currently flying are.

22 of 167 comments (clear)

  1. Also need to make it impossible to turn off GPS by CapS · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think they also need to make it impossible to turn off GPS. IIRC, that's what the pilot did on flight MH370.

    1. Re:Also need to make it impossible to turn off GPS by Dan+East · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not being allowed to and not being able to are two separate things. It's already illegal to crash an airplane into the ground to kill yourself and everyone on board. So I don't think these suicidal pilots are too worried that they are also breaking FAA regulations by flipping off a switch to disable the transponder.

      It's pretty clear that it should not be possible to disable these transponders / beacons during flight by anyone on board the plane. Or if it is possible then it requires some kind of confirmation and approval from the ground.

      --
      Better known as 318230.
    2. Re:Also need to make it impossible to turn off GPS by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think they also need to make it impossible to turn off GPS. IIRC, that's what the pilot did on flight MH370.

      If I'm on a plane and the transponder has an electrical fault and begins to start sparking and smoking I damn well want the cockpit crew to be able to pull the breaker and kill power to it.

    3. Re:Also need to make it impossible to turn off GPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      FAA determines the design also, everything has to be able to be rendered safe via toggle/fuse in addition to automatic systems. So no, you're not able to secure it entirely as it is, in addition to being mandated to have it on.

      If the attackers are knowledgeable enough to fly airliners they probably know how / where to disable that. The average nut who busts into a cockpit to kill everybody wouldn't care about a transponder probably.

    4. Re:Also need to make it impossible to turn off GPS by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 5, Funny

      I don't think these suicidal pilots are too worried that they are also breaking FAA regulations by flipping off a switch to disable the transponder.

      That's because nobody ever prosecutes them!! Hand down a few stiff sentences and fines, and then we'll see how suicidal they really are.

      --
      "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
    5. Re:Also need to make it impossible to turn off GPS by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yes, yes there are GPS transponders. You query the transponder for its location, and it reports back its GPS location. You can buy such a device right now.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    6. Re:Also need to make it impossible to turn off GPS by epine · · Score: 2

      If I'm on a plane and the transponder has an electrical fault and begins to start sparking and smoking I damn well want the cockpit crew to be able to pull the breaker and kill power to it.

      If aeronautics engineers ditch one of the redundant fuel pumps, they could make find room for a second transponder.

      Then, when one transponder sparks, and the crew pulls the breaker, you have a standard malfunction (location of plane is still known).

      However, when the second transponder is depowered, the "under ATC direction" light goes off in the passenger cabin, a nearby superpower with supersonic flight scrambles the appropriate bird, and satellites with infrared imaging capability begin snapping photos like mad around the last position reported.

      The transatlantic jet trails visible from space: How 'contrails' can stay in the sky for up to 14 hours — June 2012

      That one is in the visual, but why not the infrared? How hard can it be to detect recently condensed steam against a backdrop of minus damn cold?

      Simple solution, but perhaps someone will end up regretting that missing fail-safe fuel pump, though at least you'll know where it touched down.

    7. Re:Also need to make it impossible to turn off GPS by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 2

      We're talking about an overt action, not following FAA regulations. Nothing to stop the pilot from reaching back and opening the circuit breaker that powers the device.

      --
      "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
    8. Re:Also need to make it impossible to turn off GPS by bobby · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Under routine conditions, the modern airliner can pretty much fly itself. The pilot is there to deal with things that go wrong,. Since you can't possibly predict and program for everything that can go wrong, it's important that the pilot have the final say.

      Better that a human be the one who killed us than a machine.

      I quite agree. After reading about several recent fatal modern airliner crashes, it seems the problem was caused by the machine overpowering the humans who were unaware of the machine's efforts to compensate / counteract. Or in a few cases, the humans assumed the machine (autopilot) was still in control, when it had been disabled, but indications were subtle. It's too easy to blame the humans for not knowing what was going on. The machine's job is to serve the human and in every case I've read I fault the UI. I'm okay with the machine continuing to monitor and warn in a big way. It stuns me how these things are okayed by FAA and other regulators.

    9. Re:Also need to make it impossible to turn off GPS by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2

      He's talking about a GPS signal going out, you're talking about GPS data going out.

      Everybody knows what the OP meant - this is a battle to see who can be the most pedantic. The only winning move is not to play.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    10. Re:Also need to make it impossible to turn off GPS by bobby · · Score: 2

      Great points, but not something you can change (the available humans). IE: I take a strong stance that machines and their UI are supposed to serve US, the humans- whoever and whatever they are. I'm sick to death of holding a programmable machine (smartphone, for ex.) that I can't configure to work well for ME, the user.

      Personal case in point: for several reasons I struggle with touchscreens- mostly largish fingers. Being an EE I know there are parameters which frustratingly are hard-coded into the circuitry and software which reads the touchscreen. But I, as the users, have NO available settings. At the very least give me some kind of self-learning algorithm. As a result I mostly use a much older early smartphone which has a utility that learns your touch style / technique. But the newer Android, nope.

      Designers / manufacturers / builders have gotten too far away from the goal of machine / tech. design: serve the human. And people are literally dying unnecessarily as a result.

      Here's an idea: before putting new airliner controls into production, have an amateur / private pilot / average Joe sit in the cockpit simulator and see if they perceive that the autopilot is disengaged. Or that a partial autopilot / compensation system is partially compensating and will eventually kill lots of people. (in case you're not aware, that's what has caused most of the recent airliner disasters.)

      My point is: there's no such thing as lots of experience on a brand new thing. Worse yet- you take a familiar thing (cockpit) and change it subtly, but the resulting functionality change has huge implications, and put the same pilots in it.

      I'm sorry- it's all part of a pandemic of very bad UI design. I think much of design has moved much too much toward art and gotten away from functionality. I personally love art, but please make my machine work for ME.

  2. There are many ways to cloak them by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 2

    For one thing, the GPS satellites include error correction code, and can even be programmed to exclude certain events. They are military satellites, and we don't tell you about certain things, because it's none of your business.

    But, other than flights or areas we don't want you to know about, and if they actually have functional GPS transponders, yes, you can now follow them.

    If we want you to.

    Fun experiment: watch how your GPS gets more inaccurate and stops working in certain areas when there are certain international incidents. You'll even see your location suddenly jump way far away.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  3. They Can Still Vanish by zamboni1138 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Of course they can still vanish. Turn off the ADS-B transmitter on the aircraft and poof they're gone from the ADS-B receiver on the (Iridium) satellite.

  4. Re:Well, why do modern aircraft allow pilots to cr by djbckr · · Score: 2

    As another poster mentioned - it's pretty hard to prevent this sort of thing while allowing the pilot to do what (s)he needs to do in an emergency situation. These aircraft are already quite automated, but to completely wrest control of the airplane from the pilot, especially at low altitude... That's not good. And it would be difficult for the computer to definitively say: Ok, the pilot is in control, or the pilot is suicidal. And even if the pilot is suicidal, what does the aircraft do then exactly?

    The only way this works is if there is remote control (as in, drone tech) - and that has to be absolute perfection.

  5. Re:Why Do Airplanes Need Black Boxes At All? by Megane · · Score: 4, Informative

    CCTV-like live video feeds from the cockpit and cabin going up to a satellite uplink at all times

    You do realize that trans-oceanic planes regularly go places where there is no line-of-sight communications to civilization on the ground? Bandwidth over satellite isn't cheap, especially before this new generation of Iridium. The original Iridium didn't even have a digital mode; access devices had to have their own modem circuitry.

    They're certainly not going to spend that much just because one (1) pilot (probably) went psycho and deliberately evaded tracking. There have been other cases of pilots going psycho and crashing the plane, but only one was able to hide the plane too. And if you saw some shit going down, what would you do about it anyhow?

    --
    #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  6. Re:pgmrdlm is a moron. by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 3, Informative

    I was involved in design of FDR/CVR systems a while ago, and I cannot recall any subsystem that could NOT be shut down. Our recorders (Sundstrand Data Control units) were to check for "zero data" and based upon other sensors assert a flag indicating whether the input died OR the pilot shut it off. This configuration was altered for each airframe, as many systems were cross-linked and you could usually figure out if a system was shut off or you had a malfunction (which would bring down other systems). I can't recall of any system that was exempted - because the FAA wanted pilots to be able to shut down ANY electrical device in case of shorts or fire.

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  7. Not a GPS transponder by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 3, Informative

    GPS is a receiver (unless you're the satellite). It's probably ADS-B they're talking about. This takes the GPS position as input, and transmits position information which can appear on air traffic control screens superimposed with radar.

    It's possible to lie about your GPS position. This is why air traffic controllers have not stopped using radar (they know something is there whether it's squawking the right information from its ADS-B transponder or not).

    It is also possible to screw up your local air traffic controller with spoofed ADS-B transmissions. Cryptographic signature is not part of the system yet.

    1. Re:Not a GPS transponder by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      GPS is a receiver (unless you're the satellite).

      Indeed. And a transponder is something that replies to a request. A GPS transponder is something that replies to a request with a GPS position. Just because the request doesn't come through via GPS doesn't mean the term "GPS transponder" isn't used legitimately in literature, descriptions, wikipedia, or even ... https://www.raveon.com/m7-gx-g... the product names of the devices.

  8. Re:is the B-2 an exception? by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 2

    It's considered an act of war for a military aircraft to stop squawking its ADS-B information in another nation's airspace, without order of that nation.

  9. The sad end of Iridium Flares by jfdavis668 · · Score: 3, Informative

    The older Iridium satellites had 3 large, flat antennae on the bottom. These would reflect sunlight down, and if viewed at the right time and place after dark or before dawn, would go from invisible to the brightest thing in the sky for a few seconds. Since the satellites were in predictable orbits and orientation, it was possible to forecast exactly when these flares would occur. I enjoyed viewing them, and surprising people by pointing them out ahead of time. I'll miss them, since the new satellites are a completely different design.

  10. Re:Ejecting Black Boxes by The123king · · Score: 2

    No, aeroplane manufacturers and the FAA have a problem with unexplained plane losses too. A fault or design flaw in an aircraft that, for example, manifests itself at high altitude with sudden decompression, can cause an aircraft to literally explode. Without pieces of the aircraft to analyse, this flaw could go undiagnosed for years, causing other accidents that could have been rectified much sooner.

    --
    If you gave me a choice between a printer and a giraffe with explosive diarrhoea, i'll get my ladder and my raincoat
  11. Re:The happy end of Iridium Flares by Framboise · · Score: 2

    For some people like amateur and professional astronomers these flares have been a big nuisance. They can destroy sensitive photodetectors for instance.