Slashdot Mirror


Digital License Plates Are Now Allowed in Michigan (theverge.com)

Digital license plates are now allowed in Michigan thanks to a new state law. It will join California and Arizona as one of the few states in the US that allow digital license plates, allowing drivers to register their cars electronically and eschew old-school metal plates. From a report: To be clear, digital license plates consist of displays covered in glass that are mounted onto a frame. They come with their own computer chips and wireless communication systems. Some of the benefits of using digital licenses versus old metal ones are the ability to display Amber alerts or stolen vehicle messages when needed, but they could also make it easier to digitally renew license plates over the years. That comes at a price, though. Currently, they cost $499 for a basic version, and $799 for a premium version that features a GPS navigation add-on.

125 of 193 comments (clear)

  1. Count me out! by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 2

    I'm keeping my license plate analog. If my license plate were to have discrete letters and digits, that would just make it easier for cops to identify me.

    --
    "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
    1. Re:Count me out! by EvilSS · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm keeping my license plate analog. If my license plate were to have discrete letters and digits, that would just make it easier for cops to identify me.

      Did you get vanity plate 88BB8B8 or O0O00O0?

      https://xkcd.com/1105/

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    2. Re:Count me out! by bjdevil66 · · Score: 1

      I get the joke, but in Arizona they take that seriously because of their experiment with photo radar statewide from 2007-2010. People immediately started to do this type of gaming - and it didn't last long. All O's are banned (you have to use zeroes). And they review each vanity plate request. I tried to get D0000D and they denied my request because it was too hard to read by officers. (They also don't allow offensive plates - and there have even been "negative" leaning plates denied (Arizona State fans bagging on their rivals with CATSH8R, etc.)

      I also don't know of anyone in AZ that has the digital plates, either. I don't even know if people really know about them. Even if they did, why would they pay $499+ for a digital license plate in a state that just added a $30 "service fee" for each year of registration? (Yeah, we have lower income taxes in AZ, but the sales tax and extra fees get it from you eventually.)

    3. Re: Count me out! by pgnas · · Score: 1

      True, however, license plates will eventually go away. It will cost more for an analog plate, very much like smart meters

    4. Re:Count me out! by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1
      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
  2. More convenient for the government and banks maybe by spazmonkey · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Seems like the ability to always know your location and/or shut off your ability to legally drive if you have unpaid tickets, warrants, or some other infraction is the only real advantage. I am sure banks will use this for people behind in payments too. I see no consumer advantage to this at all, but we get to pay extra for it.

  3. Digital License plates are another tracking method by Puls4r · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have yet to see a single coherent argument for digital license plates. They cost a ton, have wireless (means they can be hacked), batteries will die....just so many many reasons. They are totally WORTHLESS for displaying amber alerts. Whichever idiot came up with that should be shitcanned now. You can't read license plates half the time right now because of dirt or covers or - reasons. Now you're what - going to obscur my license plate number and flash different colors? And you think the guy behind me is going to give a shit? Or read it?

    I could go on and on. But pretty much everyone agrees this is a horrible idea that has it's roots in yet another way to track people.

  4. What is the ROI? by sjbe · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Some of the benefits of using digital licenses versus old metal ones are the ability to display Amber alerts or stolen vehicle messages when needed

    Not to seem callous but why would I pay (a lot) extra for the ability to display Amber alerts? And there already are pretty good and more affordable solutions for stolen cars.

    Currently, they cost $499 for a basic version, and $799 for a premium version that features a GPS navigation add-on.

    WTF could these things do that would possibly justify such a price point? I already have GPS in my car and my phone so that's a non-starter, especially given that it wouldn't probably be integrated into the car's infotainment system. If my car gets stolen that's what insurance is for and shockingly my insurance appears cheaper than these things. I'm all for doing things a better way but I don't see any meaningful benefit here.

    1. Re:What is the ROI? by guruevi · · Score: 1

      Primary use is for tracking. Some countries are considering it to assess road taxes. The other reason is to enrich government and its cronies. A digital display does not cost $500; an iPad does and is much larger and more powerful than what this needs to do. I can get these produced out of China for $50/pc (1000 minimum).

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    2. Re:What is the ROI? by jeff4747 · · Score: 2

      Not to seem callous but why would I pay (a lot) extra for the ability to display Amber alerts?

      An Amber alert typically includes searching for a particular vehicle. So you wouldn't be displaying Amber alerts, the target of the Amber alert would be flashing or otherwise drawing attention to the vehicle.

      This is unlikely to convince you to buy such a plate, especially at that high a price. It's aimed at selling that plate to the state government, which then mandates it on your car. Or possibly building the technology into the car at the factory, much like OnStar can turn off a car's engine when the police request it.

    3. Re:What is the ROI? by Dorianny · · Score: 1
      I can see how this could be useful to people at high risk of disappearance due to confusion, such as people suffering from dementia. Presumably the insurance companies will also offer a deduction on coverage that covers theft.

      The negatives have thoroughly been covered in the forum so I will not bother

    4. Re:What is the ROI? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      I presume on private property the car enthusiasts can program them to say PSYWGN or whatever. The RoI on underglow isn't measured in dollars.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    5. Re:What is the ROI? by lrichardson · · Score: 2

      Could they also, at the push of a button, be set to display another number for a minute, say while you drive past the toll cameras? *That* would justify the outrageous price tag :)

    6. Re:What is the ROI? by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      WTF could these things do that would possibly justify such a price point?

      Er ... um ... you wouldn't need to put a new sticker on it every year?

      You'd just have to change a battery instead ... oh yeah.

    7. Re:What is the ROI? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      It all sounds good, untiiiil you realize that most US States have a "ballot measure" system; including Michigan.

      Once you find out that the Ebil Gubermint is easily over-ruled directly by the voters on a per-issue basis at the State level, and that license plates are done at the State level, then you can realize that it is stupid to think the State could mandate the use of something like this; or that they would even try.

      Obviously, the targets are politically-conservative investors, and the only real product is the investment instrument itself.

      If the basic purpose of the device is not clearly and entirely safety-related, then it isn't going to be mandated. Any proposals for mandated tracking will be bundled with safety equipment; not with the vehicle licensing.

      The problem with the conspiracy theorists isn't their paranoia or vigilance, it is simply their persistent lack of critical thinking about the problems they worry about.

    8. Re:What is the ROI? by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      Once you find out that the Ebil Gubermint is easily over-ruled directly by the voters on a per-issue basis at the State level, and that license plates are done at the State level, then you can realize that it is stupid to think the State could mandate the use of something like this; or that they would even try.

      "Why do you love child molesters and hate children?!!?! You want all children to be stolen in the middle of the night and raped to death!!!!"

      And now your ballot measure doesn't quite pass.

      If the basic purpose of the device is not clearly and entirely safety-related, then it isn't going to be mandated.

      Please explain the vehicle safety provided by emissions control mandates.

    9. Re:What is the ROI? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Well, in my State people are smarter than that. Not individually, perhaps, but as a group they do much better.

      Even in Michigan people aren't that stupid.

      So take heart, you won't be the only one voting!

    10. Re:What is the ROI? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The other reason is to enrich government

      Given the state of USA infrastructure and national debt this is not a bad thing.

    11. Re:What is the ROI? by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      I can think of a use case: fleets. You can assign a reserved tag to a new vehicle on the fly. Company gets to know where all its cars are. This isn’t really something that an individual would ever have a use for, but if you’re Hertz, things start to look a little different.

    12. Re:What is the ROI? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Think in terms of a US professional and their billable hours once lost to having to wait to get their rented/new car approved by the gov.
      Hours of driving out to a location, waiting, having data entered.
      Now the sale/rental deal will just be part of a new digital experience.
      What the math on hours lost in terms of $100 over hours in a year, every few years?
      US professional like new cars, more than one car, rental of new cars for a year, going to auctions of classic cars.
      Thats real hours back every year, every few years. The billable hours lost to gov interaction add up.

      Illegal migrants don't want to face new advanced city/state/federal CCTV systems in and around some US "gov" buildings and streets.
      A sanctuary city grants any random non US citizen a full US drivers licence and now long term digital plates.
      Less risk to the illegal migrant with a car/truck/SUV having to interact with the US gov.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    13. Re: What is the ROI? by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      By the company, not by the government, at least not officially.

  5. Also, a benefit is... by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

    .... the ability of being tracked by government or possibly anyone else via your license plate where ever you go. "...They come with their own computer chips and wireless communication systems...."

  6. How long until they are mandatory? by spazmonkey · · Score: 1

    At driver expense, of course.

  7. Re:More convenient for the government and banks ma by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

    Since the plate is remotely programmed, there may be the ability to have it flash in bright colors to draw attention to your vehicle for whatever reason.

  8. KISS by Fly+Swatter · · Score: 2

    Keep it simple, old plates last forever, are more durable, can be recycled, and are cheaper. There is no point in changing your license number. This is just stupidly wasteful.

    1. Re:KISS by Fly+Swatter · · Score: 1

      As a follow-up they probably also weigh more and as such will burn more gas to tote around. Are they at least made in America?

    2. Re:KISS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's extremely wasteful. None of these digital plates will make 10 years of life and just end up in landfills. You'd think California would have thought about the toxic e-waste these things are going to end up making.

      There needs to be legislation to regulate such wasteful, throw away products. Digital plates should be made illegal at the federal level. Along with millions of other trinkets that corporations buy for giveaways (just as an example). They are all cheap throw away shit, consuming resources, polluting the environment in every step of their life from the production of the raw materials to the production of the product to the shipping of the product and then ending up in a landfill after it's used for 15 minutes and tossed.

    3. Re:KISS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Are they at least made in America?

      Yes, and by prison labor. You don't want to take a job from a hard working American convict and give it to a eight year old Chinese kid, do you?

    4. Re:KISS by pgmrdlm · · Score: 1

      Keep it simple, old plates last forever, are more durable, can be recycled, and are cheaper. There is no point in changing your license number. This is just stupidly wasteful.

      Also, arn't the old plates made cheaply in prisons? Will the same type of cheap labor be used for the digital plates? Can see the messages now if so.

      --
      Anonymous comments are as pathetic as the anonymous "sources" that contaminate gutless journalism from the New York Time
  9. renew? by houghi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In Belgium you get your license plate once. You take them with you when you get a new car. When you do not need them, you bring em back i.e. drop them off at the post office.

    It is just there, so they can check the database. Plenty are 20+ years old. No need to recharge the batteries.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    1. Re:renew? by Nidi62 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In Belgium you get your license plate once. You take them with you when you get a new car. When you do not need them, you bring em back i.e. drop them off at the post office.

      In the US you keep the plate but have to renew the registration every year. Usually costs about $20-25, plus tack on another $20 for yearly required emissions. So, even at $50 a year for registration the basic plate would take 10 years before the purchase price is paid off. Now, what are the odds that an electronic plate will last 10 years without damage/needing to be replaced/etc?

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    2. Re:renew? by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      Not everywhere. In some places, the vehicle keeps the plate as it is transferred from owner to owner.

      Well, I meant you aren't getting a new plate every year, you are just paying every year for the registration for the plate.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    3. Re:renew? by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In Belgium you get your license plate once. You take them with you when you get a new car. When you do not need them, you bring em back i.e. drop them off at the post office.

      In the US you keep the plate but have to renew the registration every year. Usually costs about $20-25, plus tack on another $20 for yearly required emissions. So, even at $50 a year for registration the basic plate would take 10 years before the purchase price is paid off. Now, what are the odds that an electronic plate will last 10 years without damage/needing to be replaced/etc?

      You also pay a $7/month subscription fee for the plate; plus I doubt the DMV is going to lower the registration costs. I really don't see any great value beyond perhaps more unique vanity tags and the ability for the state to us it to identify vehicles, such as changing or flashing the number to Expired, Stolen, Amber Alert, etc. and to collect some extra cash each month. Of course, no one would figure out how to access it and change the display to something more interesting.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    4. Re:renew? by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      The plate (as in the hunk of metal with numbers on it) you keep for years.

      Some states consider the the plate to identify you, so you take it with you to a new car. Others consider it an identifier for you and the car, so you get a new plate when you get a new car.

      "Renewals" are renewing the vehicle's registration. That's annual, and is a mechanism to collect property taxes and fees. In most states it's also a mechanism to force you to have a safety and/or emissions inspection done on your car every year. This manifests itself on the license plate as stickers that indicate the month and year when your registration expires. If your stickers are missing/out-of-date, the police can pull you over and check your registration, which then lets them write you a ticket if your registration is actually are out-of-date.

    5. Re:renew? by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      $20? Where the fuck do you live? California is several hundred dollars (goes down the older your car is), and hell even Illinois is $100 for a renewal.

      GA. $20-25 for a standard tag plus the emissions charge. Specialty tags cost more. Does Cali add taxes every year?

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    6. Re:renew? by Frederic54 · · Score: 1

      Same in Canada, the plate is "yours" and whenever you change car, you transfer the plate

      --
      "Science will win because it works." - Stephen Hawking
    7. Re:renew? by green1 · · Score: 1

      Except in Quebec (which tends to be the case for basically any policy come to think of it)

    8. Re:renew? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Most states have specialty plates, but only one type of tags.

    9. Re:renew? by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      $20? Where the fuck do you live? California is several hundred dollars (goes down the older your car is), and hell even Illinois is $100 for a renewal.

      And Massachusetts gets a bad reputation for taxes? Registration for a regular passenger vehicle is $60 for two years, and annual inspection is $35, so total for the two is $65/year.

    10. Re:renew? by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      $20? Where the fuck do you live? California is several hundred dollars

      The rest of the country has been explaining how insane Californians are for most of my life. Meanwhile Hollywood thinks their infantile version of insanity is mainstream.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    11. Re:renew? by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      Highly variable in the US. In some states, renewing a tag (yearly sticker) is a major local tax source; my first tag on my current car cost roughly 3% of purchase price, though it goes down every year. And yes, that’s on top of the sales tax charged. Some states, it’s practically nothing. Some states, the tag stays with the owner; some states, the tag stays with the car; some states, you have to get a new tag for every combination of owner and car; and some states require a completely new plate every X number of years so that police can easily spot people who aren’t paying their taxes (the year stickers are quite small and not noticeable at highway speed from the roadside, but an old design sure is).

    12. Re:renew? by taustin · · Score: 1

      Must be nice to live in a place where vehicle registration is that cheap. It's an order of magnitude higher in California, even for old cars. And we kicked a governor out of office for trying to triple that.

    13. Re:renew? by taustin · · Score: 1

      Does Cali add taxes every year?

      California taxes their own taxes. Literally.

    14. Re:renew? by Strider- · · Score: 1

      In BC, it's a mix of both. If you wind up buying a new car and keeping your old one, even if it's just for a day while you try to sell it, you wind up with new plates. It used to be that people just transferred their plates, but come to think of it, most people I know have wound up changing plates as they've changed cars.

      That said, the plates just go back to ICBC, likely to be recycled.

      --
      ...si hoc legere nimium eruditionis habes...
    15. Re: renew? by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      Another Californian projecting.

      One of you fucks just whined about the cost of car registration in california, and now you are defending them by claiming that its the rest of the country that is whining.

      Look in the mirror. Its you that are whining. Its you that is insane. We are not mad at you. We are laughing at you.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    16. Re:renew? by houghi · · Score: 1

      You pay yearly as well in Belgium. Does not mean you get a new plate or a sticker to put on the plate or anything. You just get an OK in the database that the police can check if they want to.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    17. Re:renew? by Frederic54 · · Score: 1

      Wrong, I'm in Quebec and have my plate for 20 years now

      --
      "Science will win because it works." - Stephen Hawking
    18. Re:renew? by green1 · · Score: 1

      Generally in Quebec the plate stays with the vehicle, not the person as it does in the rest of Canada.

    19. Re:renew? by Frederic54 · · Score: 1

      Wrong wrong wrong completely wrong, I'm in Québec for more than 20 years and the plate is yours, whenever you change vehicle, you transfer your plate from the old car to the new car. You can have a 20 years old plate on the brand new car you bought yesterday.

      Dude, I live there, I have a 20 years plate, I know it :)

      I even bought a custom fancy plate now, when I will change my car do you think my custom fancy plate will go to the new owner?!? It does not work like this, I tell you, the plate is yours.

      --
      "Science will win because it works." - Stephen Hawking
    20. Re:renew? by green1 · · Score: 1

      You must be about the only Quebecois to do so. That's just not the normal way things are done in Quebec. Sure it's possible, that doesn't make it normal.

  10. Has anyone thought about the impact by bobstreo · · Score: 1

    to the private prison slave labor currently making license plates? /s

    1. Re:Has anyone thought about the impact by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Those are called "movies."

      You're gonna be so excited when you make it to the surface and find a theater!

    2. Re:Has anyone thought about the impact by magarity · · Score: 1

      to the private prison slave labor currently making license plates? /s

      Yes indeed; the private prison slave labor in China making the electronic plates makes the US state prisons making metal plates seem like a resort.

  11. Re:Digital License plates are another tracking met by jeff4747 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They are totally WORTHLESS for displaying amber alerts.

    Typically, the police are looking for a particular vehicle during an Amber alert.

    They idea is not to show that Amber alert on other people's cars. It's to make the target vehicle's license plate blink/flash/otherwise draw attention to the vehicle.

  12. Tracking by sjbe · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Primary use is for tracking.

    Presumably but I don't seem much reason to buy one for that since it doesn't benefit me in the slightest. My phone doing it is bad enough already.

    Some countries are considering it to assess road taxes.

    Which would be idiotic. Tax fuel (gasoline, diesel, and/or electricity) at appropriate levels and you accomplish the sensible goal of taxing in close accordance with utilization. The bigger the vehicle and the more someone drives the more fuel they will use. Trying to track mileage via a plate is idiotic.

    The other reason is to enrich government and its cronies.

    Probably closer to the truth.

    1. Re:Tracking by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Tax fuel (gasoline, diesel, and/or electricity) at appropriate levels and you accomplish the sensible goal of taxing in close accordance with utilization. The bigger the vehicle and the more someone drives the more fuel they will use. Trying to track mileage via a plate is idiotic.

      I think they're trying to be pro-active, and tax on mileage, for when electric cars become predominant, and don't generate gasoline tax revenues.

      Hell, they're trying to do this already due to the better economy that cars/trucks are getting, that it has caused a decrease in tax revenues already.

      I don't agree with it.....but there you go.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    2. Re:Tracking by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      How do you tax electricity without increasing the cost of electricity used for normal household purposes: lighting, computers, A/C, appliances, etc.? You would have to require all charging be done through an additional meter. Even if there is another meter in the house, the electric vehicle could still be charged via a dryer outlet.

      How do you tax electricity for those whose net usage is zero due to solar panels?

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    3. Re:Tracking by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      You tax all electricity -- a kWh is a kWh and makes the same amount of CO2 (depending on source) regardless of where it is used. Give a tax credit for the poor below a certain income.

      As far as having one's own solar system, the obvious solution is not to tax it -- that would encourage installation of solar systems.

      If you want to tax mileage, tax tires and require annual inspections to check for safe tires. Tire wear correlates pretty well to miles traveled and vehicle weight.

    4. Re: Tracking by link-error · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Or, you could just look at the odometer which correlates perfectly with milage.

      --
      -Unresolved symbol? Byte me!
    5. Re:Tracking by sconeu · · Score: 2

      I go on a coast to coast trip and back. Of that 6000 miles of wear, only about 400 miles is from California. Why should CA tax me on 6000 miles of wear instead of 400?

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    6. Re:Tracking by ljw1004 · · Score: 1

      Tax fuel (gasoline, diesel, and/or electricity) at appropriate levels and you accomplish the sensible goal of taxing in close accordance with utilization. The bigger the vehicle and the more someone drives the more fuel they will use.

      That's incorrect. Road damage increases as the fourth power of vehicle weight according to the US General Accountability Office
      https://www.denenapoints.com/r...

      An 18-wheeler (~6mpg) causes as much road damage as 10,000 cars (~25mpg). The 18-wheeler is paying 4x as much tax but causing 10,000x as much damage. That is not "close accordance" at all.

      Now it depends what you mean by "utilization". If you're referring to overall US expenditure to ensure a reliable oil supply then sure, that's directly proportional to the amount of gas you use. But if you're referring to all-up expenditure including roads and infrastructure then it's not.

    7. Re:Tracking by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Federal tax, doled out to states proportionally to population.

    8. Re:Tracking by sconeu · · Score: 2

      And what, precisely, is the constitutional basis for such a tax?

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    9. Re:Tracking by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      A document written 200+ years ago by a bunch of dead men isn't gospel.

    10. Re:Tracking by mentil · · Score: 1

      The constitution actually mandates apportionate taxes (each state being taxed an identical amount). It took an amendment to allow otherwise.

      --
      Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    11. Re:Tracking by sconeu · · Score: 2

      Technically, for the US government, it is. Otherwise, the government has no legal existence.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  13. Re:Digital License plates are another tracking met by chuckugly · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So all we have to do is get all the kiddie fiddlers to buy $500 plates. Well on second thought, brilliant!

  14. Re:Digital License plates are another tracking met by Diss+Champ · · Score: 1

    If you can get them to shell out $799 for the premium version, they can report their GPS coordinates to the authorities as well.

  15. Re:More convenient for the government and banks ma by rjune · · Score: 1

    Based on the size of the unit, it looks like there is plenty of room to add the capability to record not only your current location, but a record of where and when you traveled, along with the speeds. What a treasure trove of information to be exploited, stolen, and misused. All paid for by you! My plate will be NFW-999 (No F****** Way Ever!)

  16. Re:Digital License plates are another tracking met by jeff4747 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The Amber alert angle is designed to sell the plates to the state government, who would then mandate them on cars. Or as a reason for someone like GM to integrate them into the car for OnStar's "we stop the bad guys" angle.

    If they were mandated, presumably the cost would be lower due to the large volume produced. For now, it's a very niche product so it's expensive.

  17. You can see it coming by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So all we have to do is get all the kiddie fiddlers to buy $500 plates.

    So the next obvious step is to mandate all sex offenders registering in the state, must in fact buy these plates... who would vote against that?

    Then from there you do felons, then from there anyone who gets arrested for any reason, then from there everyone.

    You can see it coming...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  18. no thanks, ill stick with the old metal plates by FudRucker · · Score: 1

    i want my metal licence plate stamped in a prison by some condemned prisoner that is doing a life sentence for murder or some other heinous crime

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
  19. Can I run Linux on it? by mnemotronic · · Score: 1

    Say I "acquire" one of these. Can I load a different OS onto it and turn it into a pad or e-reader? Of course I'd go for the "premium" model, so I'd have to disable the pesky tracking features.

    --
    The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
    1. Re:Can I run Linux on it? by mnemotronic · · Score: 1

      Don't think of it as a license plate. Say someone steals it from my vehicle, loads new software and voilà, their own android pad, all for the cost of a screwdriver and a few minutes.

      --
      The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
  20. Re:Digital License plates are another tracking met by EvilSS · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have yet to see a single coherent argument for digital license plates.

    Here's one: The implementation will probably be so shitty they will be hackable by the owner to display whatever you want. I'm sure a certain segment of society could find that useful.

    --
    I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
  21. Tracking mileage for taxation is idiotic by sjbe · · Score: 2

    I think they're trying to be pro-active, and tax on mileage, for when electric cars become predominant, and don't generate gasoline tax revenues.

    Taxing mileage is idiotic and needlessly complicated. You can accomplish raising the necessary revenue by taxing electricity in pretty much the same manner you tax gasoline today. Cross reference the registration with the electric bill if you need to know exactly whose car it is to bill properly. The increase in electric use will correspond nicely with the increased use of electric vehicles and you can adjust the rate to the amount needed to maintain the roads properly.

    Hell, they're trying to do this already due to the better economy that cars/trucks are getting, that it has caused a decrease in tax revenues already.

    Only because we have idiots in elected office who refuse to raise tax rates even when its a good idea. (and yes sometimes raising taxes is the correct policy) You are aware you can change the tax rates right? They aren't set in stone and we can adjust them based on fuel economy if needed. As EVs become more common you can adjust the electric rates as well.

    1. Re:Tracking mileage for taxation is idiotic by guruevi · · Score: 2

      Taxing mileage is done all over Europe though. Together with weight and engine size, they decide your car taxes, insurance and even taxable income as work-home traffic is discounted, hence why they're putting cameras up to track people and correlate with what they're reporting on their tax returns.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    2. Re:Tracking mileage for taxation is idiotic by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Taxing mileage is idiotic and needlessly complicated. You can accomplish raising the necessary revenue by taxing electricity in pretty much the same manner you tax gasoline today. Cross reference the registration with the electric bill if you need to know exactly whose car it is to bill properly. The increase in electric use will correspond nicely with the increased use of electric vehicles and you can adjust the rate to the amount needed to maintain the roads properly.

      First, please don't believe I"m in favor of taxing things....I pay too much as it is.

      But with electric cars...what do the politicians do about people with solar panels ( they are pushing that too you know)? I mean, if they generate their own electricity for the most part...there is lost tax revenue too.

      Where does it start/stop?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    3. Re:Tracking mileage for taxation is idiotic by sjbe · · Score: 1

      Taxing mileage is done all over Europe though.

      That doesn't make it a good idea.

      Together with weight and engine size, they decide your car taxes, insurance and even taxable income as work-home traffic is discounted, hence why they're putting cameras up to track people and correlate with what they're reporting on their tax returns.

      That's needlessly complicated. Bigger and more powerful cars draw more fuel. Physics ensures that. Just tax the fuel and charge an appropriate rate and you are done. No need to incur the huge expense of tracking everyone's mileage.

  22. Re:Digital License plates are another tracking met by hawguy · · Score: 2

    They are totally WORTHLESS for displaying amber alerts.

    Typically, the police are looking for a particular vehicle during an Amber alert.

    They idea is not to show that Amber alert on other people's cars. It's to make the target vehicle's license plate blink/flash/otherwise draw attention to the vehicle.

    That makes no sense -- if that have this remotely accessible device that they can set to flashing mode, why don't they just ask the device to report its location and then the police know exactly where it is, no need to wait on other drivers to report it, or turn them into vigilantes that will try to apprehend the driver themselves.

  23. No point in Europe... by Tomahawk · · Score: 2

    The registration number on a car here in Europe rarely changes, certainly never is the vast majority of cases. The registration number belongs to the car, and stays with the car for its life.
    One of the reasons the number might change is when a car is exported and thus re-registered in another country (e.g. in Ireland it's much cheaper to buy a used car in the UK and import and re-register it than to buy a lower spec used car here).
    Another is vanity plates, which aren't available in all countries. I think they still are in the UK, but not in Ireland -- Irish registration numbers have the year of first sale, the county, and a sequential number, so, say 191-D-1234 is the 1234th car registered in Co. Dublin in the first half of 2019 (192 for the second half). It's possible to reserve a number in advance, though, so you could reserve 191-D-80085. That's as close to vanity plates we have. Numbers above 120000 are reserved for imports, so a car originally purchased in the UK in 2010 and re-registered several years later in Ireland would get a 10-D-120000+ registration number. (The 3rd digit attached to the year didn't start until 2013, partly to boost latter-half sales by having 2 "years", and partly to avoid having 13...)
    Anyway, a registration plate is about â20 or less. Why would anyone pay â500 or more?

    1. Re:No point in Europe... by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      OTOH, if it was mandated in Europe, a year later this same post would still be showing up.

      Europe isn't a country and doesn't have a constitution, and yet you have rules that your governments are required to implement. Your system of government is such that you can't make broad statements about what changes you might see in the future; you could have nearly any rules in the future, without even having to change the system.

      If there is a point or not is something you'll have to wait until they tell you to know. You don't even have freedom of speech.

    2. Re: No point in Europe... by Tomahawk · · Score: 1

      Well, in Ireland, UK, Poland, France, Italy, and Germany, in pretty sure that's the case. I suppose I did generalise for all countries.

      Let me rephrase to "In many, maybe not all, European countries...".

    3. Re: No point in Europe... by Tomahawk · · Score: 1

      Well, Europeans tend to have more liberties and freedoms than in the US, as well as many more protections from money grabbing corporations (GDPR being a recent case in point). Free Speech is protected, both in the European Constitution, and individual countries constitutions. In all, it's a great place to live.

      It's not perfect. We have some laws that not everybody will agree with (the copyright stuff). But overall, the European Council seems to do stuff right, and generally doesn't come up with too many stupid ideas.

      Plus we don't have an Oompa Lumpa in charge, so we have that going for us too, which is nice.

    4. Re: No point in Europe... by Tomahawk · · Score: 1

      ("European Constitution" referring to the current European Treaty (Lisbon). Not an actual condition, per se, but is treated as such.)

    5. Re: No point in Europe... by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      There is no European Constitution.

      That isn't actually hard to understand.

      Having a treaty that says words about rights isn't the same thing.

      Like, duh.

  24. Billing EVs for road maintenance by sjbe · · Score: 1

    How do you tax electricity without increasing the cost of electricity used for normal household purposes: lighting, computers, A/C, appliances, etc.?

    Several answer to that. First off it doesn't matter if we increase the cost of electricity for other purposes - the cost of gasoline is priced into everything we do currently so it doesn't really change anything in that regard.
    1) Most people are going to charge their cars at their homes. If they don't have an EV then they won't get billed for charging one.
    2) You cross reference the EV car registration with the electric bill and charge accordingly. Require every EV to have a home meter responsible for the taxes.
    3) You tax all third party rapid charge stations including those at places of employment.
    4) You charge an excise tax on electrical generation based on electrical vehicle registrations if you need to make up any revenue shortfalls.

    I own an EV and my electric bill rose as a result. It would make sense for some portion of my electric bill to go towards road maintenance just like my gasoline purchases do.

    How do you tax electricity for those whose net usage is zero due to solar panels?

    You can require a meter on the panels regardless of whether they pull from the grid and tax accordingly. If the person doesn't own an EV then they can get a waiver to avoid the taxes. Require the person who registers an EV to tie it to a home meter of some kind (grid tied or not) and bill that meter. Right now this is kind of a non-issue since so few people have solar but now would be the time to but the policies in place to be ready for an EV laden future.

    1. Re:Billing EVs for road maintenance by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      I own two EVs and my cost of electricity is zero. Solar panels FTW!

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    2. Re:Billing EVs for road maintenance by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 1

      Really? Someone gave you free solar panels and the associated wiring/circuitry?

      --
      The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
    3. Re:Billing EVs for road maintenance by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      Try to understand the concept of "context". We were discussing the concept of raising funds to road repair by taxing electricity. Thus, my prior installation of solar panels would not be taxed. Hence your snark is just that: a snarky, irrelevant comment.

      Secondly, I was quite careful to write that I pay nothing for electricity. You need to understand the difference between marginal costs (like electricity) and fixed costs (like the cost of installing the solar system).

      Thirdly, and I realize that you did not know this, but, we bought a second electric car in 2018 and still pay nothing for electricity, so, in this case the cost of energy for that second car is zero.

      Finally, before we got the second EV, my calculations showed payoff for my solar system in 6 years. With the price of electricity likely to rise in CA and the addition of a second EV, the payoff point is probably 4-5 years.

      Thanks for your contributions to my finances through your generous subsidies to my solar system and EVs.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    4. Re:Billing EVs for road maintenance by guruevi · · Score: 1

      People will find a way around taxes. Unless you want to give up all constitutional rights and give agents free access to your home at any point to check that you didn't rig up some tax avoidance scheme. The EU went down this path and now they are putting up cameras to track people driving so they can correlate what they say they drove between work and home with what they report on their tax bill.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    5. Re:Billing EVs for road maintenance by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 1

      I understand marginal cost.

      More to the point, I also understand the concept of amortizing the cost of something over the useful life of that something.

      Your cost of electricity per watt from solar costs you the price of the solar system (including the opportunity cost of what you could have done with that money, i.e. a reasonable interest rate over the expected life) divided by the number of watts you're going to use over the life of the solar system.

      Also, I wasn't responding to you saying that you "pay nothing", you actually said "my cost of electricity is zero". Big difference. Your solar system may have already cost you, but it did cost you.

      --
      The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
  25. Talking about paying for something to be tracked.. by grumpyman · · Score: 1

    ... the smart speakers (home mini, echo) are selling like hotcakes!

  26. Oh great by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

    Now Jiffy Lube will offer to change your license plate battery for just another $49.99.

  27. Re:Purpose: first it is optional then it is mandat by green1 · · Score: 1

    Why would you replace existing plates every 10 years? That seems incredibly wasteful! My plate is currently 20 years old, and my parents have plates that are 35 years old dating back to the last time the government changed the look of the plates. (Government tried again to change the look of the plates a couple years back, but there was a huge outcry about the waste of money so they gave up. It appears that they were only trying to change the plates because the government of the day didn't like that the new opposition party that just formed had used part of the slogan on the plate as part of their name, so they wanted to spend millions of taxpayer dollars just to try to change that)

  28. The government already has vehicle tracking by virtig01 · · Score: 1

    It's called TPMS. All new passenger cars in the US and EU as of 2012 have it. And it's not opt-in.

    1. Re:The government already has vehicle tracking by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Easy enough to disable the sensors once your car is inspected. Then just re-enable them for the next inspection in two years (assuming you live in a state that gives a fuck).

    2. Re:The government already has vehicle tracking by PPH · · Score: 1

      First tire change: Slip tire guy a couple of bucks to remove sensors. Mount them in a little air bottle (properly pressurized) in the trunk to keep the TPMS receiver happy during inspection. Leave at home otherwise.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  29. Re:Digital License plates are another tracking met by magarity · · Score: 4, Informative

    So all we have to do is get all the kiddie fiddlers to buy $500 plates. Well on second thought, brilliant!

    Over half of Amber alerts are not "kiddie fiddlers" but a parent on the wrong side of a custody dispute.

  30. Re:Digital License plates are another tracking met by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

    That makes no sense -- if that have this remotely accessible device that they can set to flashing mode, why don't they just ask the device to report its location

    Did you miss the part where the base model doesn't have GPS?

  31. No flipping way by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    You know good and well, someone is going to hack these stupid things. It's a government plate, it won't be THAT secure. Has it's own built in wireless/wifi/transmitter thingy. That means, once people start using them, "for the convenience/safety" BS, instead of a gas tax, they will simply use how many miles you drive to tax you. Oh, gee...they know EXACTLY where you are, when you were somewhere, how long it took you to get from point A to point B. You think they won't GIVE YOU A TICKET, if you arrive faster than they think you should? On and on and on and on people give up their privacy because they are told, it's more "convenient".

  32. Re:Digital License plates are another tracking met by lrichardson · · Score: 2

    I can see that statistic changing quickly: over 90% of people pulled over (at gunpoint, goes without saying) for having a flashing 'Amber Alert' digital plate were on the wrong side of a dispute ... with a hacker.

  33. Re:Digital License plates are another tracking met by hawguy · · Score: 1

    That makes no sense -- if that have this remotely accessible device that they can set to flashing mode, why don't they just ask the device to report its location

    Did you miss the part where the base model doesn't have GPS?

    I re-read it and I still don't see that part, I only see "$799 for a premium version that features a GPS navigation add-on.", you don't need GPS navigation for simple position reports, just need a $30 GPS chipset, and I'd be very surprised if all of the frames don't already have that chipset and the "GPS Navigation" is just not activated unless you pay extra.

    I don't even know what they mean by "GPS navigation add-on" -- how does a license plate frame help with GPS navigation? Going around to the back of the car to look at a map projected on the license plate frame seems awfully inconvenient. Maybe it works with a mobile app, but my phone has GPS built-in so I don't need it in the license plate frame. And if that $300 option includes an extra GPS display inside the car, why wouldn't I just buy a $100 Garmin instead? I don't see how the license plate frame GPS adds value.

  34. Re:Digital License plates are another tracking met by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    I agree with you 100%, this kind of crap is totally insane. Just like "smart assistants", people will pay to get themselves tracked by the government, hackers and other nefarious groups.

    What we need is transparent displays inside the rear windows of cars and trucks, to display scrolling messages, short animations and videos to annoy the people following us and to prevent us to clearly see what's happening in our rear-view mirrors.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  35. Re:Digital License plates are another tracking met by Strider- · · Score: 1

    So all we have to do is get all the kiddie fiddlers to buy $500 plates. Well on second thought, brilliant!

    While you're making a snide comment, the reality is that the vast majority of child abductions (and resulting amber alerts) are due to parental abductions (ie estranged mother/father running with the kids during custody battles etc....

    --
    ...si hoc legere nimium eruditionis habes...
  36. This reminds me of the CueCat by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 2

    There was an excellent review by the Evening Standard's Debbie Barham of the cuecat scanner years ago, and the line that stuck out is "it fails to solve a problem which never existed."

    That applies here.

  37. Forget digital by PPH · · Score: 1

    I want backlit plates like Japan allows.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  38. Re:Digital License plates are another tracking met by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

    Eventually their use will be mandatory, adding yet another brick in the wall of expensive parts that keeps poor people from affordable cars. It's a climate change win as long as we keep them from wearing safety vests.

    --
    This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
  39. Seems like an opportunity by fyngyrz · · Score: 2

    So, criminal buys fancy license plate so state knows they've got one.

    Uses maker skills (theirs or someone else's) to make plate visually identical (for considerably less money, as the price of this thing is crazy, but anyway...) then programs it to display license number YRT387 as per usual.

    But on Tuesday, alters plate number to HFG221. Does crime. Drives off. Alters plate number back to YRT387. Cops are looking for HFG221.

    Yes, these are definitely a great idea. /s

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    1. Re:Seems like an opportunity by zlives · · Score: 1

      this like everything else is for citizens that follow without question. abuse just shows that the govt loves them.

    2. Re:Seems like an opportunity by WorBlux · · Score: 1

      But your forgot to change the wireless MAC, the secret short-range transmitter, and turned the gps on accidentally, so they got you anyways and had proof you were at the scene of the crime.

  40. Re:Purpose: first it is optional then it is mandat by imidan · · Score: 1

    Why would you replace existing plates every 10 years? That seems incredibly wasteful!

    Two reasons. First, the plate could deteriorate over time, so the state wants you to have new plates periodically so that they're always in good enough shape to be legible. Second, and perhaps more important, is that the state charges me a higher fee in years when they've decided I need a new plate, and I sincerely doubt that the added fee exactly offsets the cost of the plate--they get a little additional revenue. In the past, I have suggested that I would be willing to pay the additional fee while continuing to use my existing plates, which were perfectly serviceable, but it's not an option.

  41. Easy disproof of intelligence/income link by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    The fact that these troublesome, privacy-eviscerting, upside-free license plates are priced out of reach of the lower and middle classes, and yet there are people buying them.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  42. Re:Digital License plates are another tracking met by taustin · · Score: 1

    If they were mandated, presumably the cost would be lower due to the large volume produced.

    You might presume that, and possibly there will even be places where it'd happen. In California, they'd make you get a separate license for it, and slap a tax on top of that.

  43. Re: 8008S by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

    No, I think there are companies with solutions looking for problems.

    This thing does absolutely nothing better that a printed plate can't do except spy on you, cost far more, and fail more often in ways that are far more severe.

    Fuck this bullshit.

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  44. Re:Digital License plates are another tracking met by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

    Number of vehicles registered per year?
    Number of amber alerts per year?
    Cost of "digital" plate versus stamped plate?
    "Unintended" costs to non-abductor users?

    I think we can find better solutions that don't disproportionately affect everybody because of the 0.0001% of vehicles used in the commission of an amber-alert disappearance.

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  45. Re:Digital License plates are another tracking met by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

    It would still be worse, becuase LCD / LED displays are far more fragile than a sheet of stamped fucking steel.

    I don't see lines of people looking to get replacement plates due to damaged plates today, and even if they did the cost is 10% of the replacement cost of one of these. Incredibly more fragile and far more expensive than the incumbent solution is an awesome market advantage.

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  46. Don't get "NO PLATE" "NO PL8" "NO TAG" or MISSING by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    Don't get "NO PLATE" "NO PL8" "NO TAG" or "MISSING". You're likely to get a flood of citations for parked cars with missing plates.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  47. Track, Compile, Target, Eliminate by BrendaEM · · Score: 1

    Aren't people's lives tracked enough, already? When they want you, they are going to get you.

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/c/BrendaEM
  48. Re:Digital License plates are another tracking met by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    Protest near a US mil base and that's tracked.
    Request documents from a city gov and who was in the car park at that time is now on record.
    No more having a city worker follow the person out into the car park to photograph the license plate :)
    No more city police and private security having to ask for photo ID and where the car is.
    Do a first amendment audit and every type of transport in the area is fully investigated.
    Drive too near a cult compound and their private detectives will know who is doing a TV report on them.

    The fun part is what the private sector can then sell back to any business/cult/gov/mil/embassy too.
    Every city worker, after work police car can be tracked. Even if their details are not kept, the real time movements of transport use can be tracked.
    Every normal looking unmarked "undercover" police car in a city can be tracked as they drive out to meet their informants.
    No more police ghosts in the digital world.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  49. Stupidity - 10 plate can do it by iggymanz · · Score: 1

    Just put a plate with a unique QR or barcode on every car, once. No need for expensive scanners, police could scan plates with a even a cell phone app. A plate is either paid up or not.

    Fucking 19th century mentality....

  50. The hackers will have a field-day! by AntisocialNetworker · · Score: 1

    Oh boy, I can make that dude's car appear like stolen, or even put a picture of my penis on it?

  51. Re:Digital License plates are another tracking met by mapkinase · · Score: 1

    It makes more sense with allowing everybody around you to freely read your digital license plate number via a freely available app.

    The same app could be used to alert authorities about bad driving habits :-) I am kidding if you do not like this and serious if you like it.

    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
  52. Re:Digital License plates are another tracking met by mapkinase · · Score: 1

    >Over half of Amber alerts are not "kiddie fiddlers" but a parent on the wrong side of a custody dispute.

    Do you have the statistics for that? My impression is that almost all of of them (90%) are of the mentioned kind.

    Nicely put, by the way:

    > parent

    Like it is fifty/fifty. These filthy men for some reason always abduct the kids and poor nice and fuzzy women almost never abduct their kids.

    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
  53. Use a meter by sjbe · · Score: 1

    But with electric cars...what do the politicians do about people with solar panels ( they are pushing that too you know)? I mean, if they generate their own electricity for the most part...there is lost tax revenue too.

    They can require a meter on the panels even if they don't actually draw from the grid or get a bill from the power company. Electric code would be relatively easy to change and now would be the time to implement it. Doing that is MUCH easier than trying to track down every car and track its mileage. Just make sure every car is assigned to the meter for the owner's primary address.