Slashdot Mirror


US Will Seek Extradition of Huawei CFO From Canada (reuters.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Reuters: The U.S. Justice Department said on Tuesday it will pursue the extradition of the chief financial officer of China's Huawei, arrested in Canada in December. The United States has accused Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou of misrepresenting the company's links to a firm that tried to sell equipment to Iran despite U.S. sanctions. The arrest soured relations between Canada and China, with China subsequently detaining two Canadian citizens and sentencing a third to death. The United States must file a formal request for extradition by Jan. 30. Once a formal request is received, a Canadian court has 30 days to determine whether there is enough evidence to support extradition and the Canadian minister of justice must issue a formal order. Canada has not asked the United States to abandon its bid to have Huawei executive Meng Wanzhou extradited, Canada's Foreign Minister Chrystia Freeland said in an interview with Bloomberg TV. "We will continue to pursue the extradition of defendant Ms. Meng Wanzhou, and will meet all deadlines set by the U.S./Canada Extradition Treaty," Justice Department spokesman Marc Raimondi said in a statement. "We greatly appreciate Canada's continuing support of our mutual efforts to enforce the rule of law."

Slashdot reader AmiMoJo shares a separate report from the BBC: The chairman of Chinese tech giant Huawei has warned his company could shift away from the U.S. and the U.K. if it continues to face restrictions. Huawei has been under scrutiny by Western governments, which fear its products could be used for spying. Speaking at the World Economic Forum, in Davos, Mr Liang Hua said his firm might transfer technology to countries "where we are welcomed." Huawei makes smartphones but is also a world leader in telecoms infrastructure, in particular the next generation of mobile phone networks, known as 5G.

156 comments

  1. Torture and kidnappings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it's not CIA capturing and torturing people, it's the less shadowy part of their government literally keeping people hostage in exchange for beneficial market policies. This is all about Huawei's growth and increasing market share, nothing else.

    The U.S. has no credibility and acts without impunity to get what it wants, and it's time the world stands up against them.

    1. Re:Torture and kidnappings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Huawei is owned by the Chinese government and is credibly accused of spying. If they don't want to do business with the US and thus are able to ignore our laws, that's one thing. To walk through US jurisdiction knowing you're wanted?

      Leads to your ass getting arrested, extradited to face charges, charged, tried in a court with legal representation and rights, and then either let go on the merits or imprisoned on the merits. It's nothing like China's kangaroo courts.

      You should spend a few years in a Chinese prison on bogus charges so you have some actual perspective between the two systems, moron.

    2. Re:Torture and kidnappings by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      This is all about Huawei's growth and increasing market share, nothing else.

      You think Huawei refusing to play ball with Five Eyes has nothing to do with it? Please.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    3. Re:Torture and kidnappings by Aighearach · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So, you're on the "give away rule of law because of blackmail" team?

      Yeah, don't expect anybody to listen for very long.

    4. Re:Torture and kidnappings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The guy who was shipping a ton of drugs kinda deserves the death penalty, he knew what he was doing and the consequences in that country. I have no problem with them executing that moron. The other 2 are pawns.

      China is taking hostages to trade. We should stop allowing direct flights between the US and China period. Cut them off at the knees.

    5. Re:Torture and kidnappings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Credibly? I see only accusations, never any proof. The only one continuously caught with its pants down considering backdoors is Cisco.

    6. Re:Torture and kidnappings by meglon · · Score: 0, Troll

      What rule of law? Trumps already said he might use her as a pawn in his stupider than fuck trade war against China....that's not the rule of law, that's outright authoritarian bullshit. He may very well have given Canada every reason to not extradite her right there. You can be stupider than fuck and ignore what he said, but other people in the world are not as fucking clueless as his followers..... he fucked up because he's a fucking narcissistic idiot who doesn't know a fucking thing about the "rule of law," and he doesn't care.

      --
      Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
    7. Re:Torture and kidnappings by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      How about instead of arresting people from a country that you are supposedly at peace with and then extraditing them to another country the both of you are supposedly at peace with, you send them back to their home country and let their home country deal with them however their home country sees fit.

      What the actual fuck? That's not how international law works, asshole. You come here, you break a law, and you get punished here. If I go to China and steal a car, you can bet your ass I'd end up in a Chinese prison.

      Next time engage your brain before your mouth. No country on Earth would be okay with what you are suggesting. ZERO

    8. Re:Torture and kidnappings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Governments putting sanctions on other countries is something that happens at the government level. If a business breaches those sanctions then it should be up to the government of the country in which that business is homed to sort it out. The US should have placed their complaint with the Chinese government and left individual people alone.

      The fact that Canada played along and arrested her is disappointing too, as they did not have any real legal reason to do so. "Some guy in another country asked us to hold her" should not be grounds for arresting anybody.

    9. Re:Torture and kidnappings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What rule of law?

      The fucking CONSTITUTION, dipshit. The President can push whatever levers of government are available to him! Just because YOU don't like what he's doing doesn't mean he's operating outside the law. Or would you care to name an actual crime? Because YOU know better than Mueller, right?!

    10. Re:Torture and kidnappings by ghoul · · Score: 1

      She hasn't broken any Canadian laws. The very fact that Canada is holding her for extradition when Canadian law clearly states that extradition is only for crimes which are crimes in both countries, is a human right violation.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    11. Re:Torture and kidnappings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Huawei isn't owned by the Chinese government any more than Boeing or Lockheed is owned by the US government. Lol at walking through US jurisdiction. Canada is now US jurisdiction? WTH?

      Who the hell is upvoting this junk.

    12. Re:Torture and kidnappings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She's a board officer of the company, she's responsible for actions of the company itself - legally. You know nothing about this.

    13. Re:Torture and kidnappings by meglon · · Score: 0

      No, he actually can't BECAUSE OF the constitution. The constitution restricts what he can and can't do, BUT (because you're stupider than fuck i'll spell it out) he doesn't care about the rule of law... which is why he keeps getting slapped down by the courts. You're as much of a fucking idiot as he is. I get it, you fucking neonazi's love his authoritarian bullshit because the only card you have is trying to be the bully... but you're not, you're pathetic little incels who are stupider than a fucking rock....and quite frankly, you obviously don't know jack shit about the constitution.

      Canada may very well look at his comments as an admission that the US asked for her to be detained purely to be used as trade war leverage... purely because of his stupidity in making that comment.

      --
      Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
    14. Re:Torture and kidnappings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So if the US has a stupid law does that mean that the world has to follow, just because "RULE OF LAW"? Maybe sometimes common sense is also needed?

    15. Re:Torture and kidnappings by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 2

      So far the US hasn't given the Canadian legal system a detailed reason why, along with evidence, they want us to extradite Meng Wanzhou. The first part of the process is to prevent the person from leaving the country, which has been done.

      We are waiting for the US to file the proper documentation with the specific charges and evidence so that our judicial system can make the decision if she can be extradited according to our treaty and if she is that she won't face any punishment that deprives her of her human rights (torture, capital punishment, etc).

      This being a politically motivated move the US is waiting until the last moment to file the paperwork. They don't care about the fallout this is having on Canada. Trump probably sees that as an extra bonus.

    16. Re:Torture and kidnappings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except it happened because the US broke a treaty, and it wasn't actually Huawei that broke the law, it's Skycom, which is a technically a separate legal entity. By your definition the CFO of Google also broke the law because google sells its technology to Huawei which deals with Skycom which operates in Iraqi.

    17. Re:Torture and kidnappings by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      We had a treaty obligation to make the arrest. You can be sure that everyone involved and all of the politicians didn't want this to happen.

    18. Re:Torture and kidnappings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except it happened because the US broke a treaty, and it wasn't actually Huawei that broke the law, it's Skycom, which is technically a separate legal entity and btw doesn't do busienss in the US. By your definition the CFO of Google also broke the law because google sells its technology to Huawei which deals with Skycom which operates in Iraqi.

    19. Re:Torture and kidnappings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's not forget this only happened because US broke a treaty based also on false accusations about modern day Iran.

    20. Re:Torture and kidnappings by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Vancouver is not US jurisdiction.

    21. Re:Torture and kidnappings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've got an idea for dealing with China for you.

      1) Recall the Canadian diplomats from China.

      2) As soon as you confirm they got on the plane and the plane is out of Chinese airspace, arrest the Chinese diplomat. Don't bother to bring any charges. Trade the diplomat for the remaining Canadian citizens China holds.

      If China will not abide by rule of law, they deserve none.

    22. Re:Torture and kidnappings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes, they have. You either are uninformed or lying. They haven't broken down the entire case, but the fraud charges are directly related to Huawei's control of a corporate shell company under Meng's tenure as CFO. It's not political.

      It's fraud, a crime, and she's being tried. Basic shit. Dry your eyes.

    23. Re:Torture and kidnappings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Who the hell is upvoting this junk."

      Most likely people who get paid doing this for a living.

    24. Re:Torture and kidnappings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, he actually can't BECAUSE OF the constitution. The constitution restricts what he can and can't do, BUT (because you're stupider than fuck i'll spell it out) he doesn't care about the rule of law... which is why he keeps getting slapped down by the courts. You're as much of a fucking idiot as he is. I get it, you fucking neonazi's love his authoritarian bullshit because the only card you have is trying to be the bully... but you're not, you're pathetic little incels who are stupider than a fucking rock....and quite frankly, you obviously don't know jack shit about the constitution.

      Canada may very well look at his comments as an admission that the US asked for her to be detained purely to be used as trade war leverage... purely because of his stupidity in making that comment.

      That is at +1 on slashdot in 2019. Never thought I'd see the day when that kind of vitriol would go positive here. Seems that culture, discourse, and intelligence is progressing in the wrong direction.

    25. Re:Torture and kidnappings by n0nsensical · · Score: 1

      We don't negotiate with terrorists

    26. Re:Torture and kidnappings by n0nsensical · · Score: 1

      More like, Waaaahwei. Poor China, still butthurt because their still-continuing centuries of incompetent leadership couldn't stop the country from getting taken over by Mongolians and Europeans and Japanese. Their great idea? Build a wall to keep out the Mongolians. Ask them how it worked out. At least W was a history major.

    27. Re:Torture and kidnappings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it wasn't actually Huawei that broke the law, it's Skycom, which is technically a separate legal entity and btw doesn't do busienss in the US.

      Huawei owned a controlling interest in Skycom and ran it as a shell company. That's like putting a sock puppet on your hand and then saying it's not really you controlling the puppet out of the corner of your mouth. If sanctions could be so easily evaded they would be meaningless.

    28. Re:Torture and kidnappings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vancouver is not US jurisdiction.

      That's irrelevant because the US and Canada have a pre-existing treaty agreement, carrying force of law in both countries, to consider extradition of accused criminals subject to the agreed upon procedures. Most nations recognize that it's not generally in their best interests to harbor fugitives or allow bit players to complicate bigger issues like trade, banking and tax cooperation among other pressing concerns.

    29. Re: Torture and kidnappings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "To walk through US jurisdiction knowing you're wanted?"

      Fuck you, ignorant yank. Canada is US jurisdiction"

    30. Re: Torture and kidnappings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She didn't walk through US jurisdiction - she is in Canada idiot. Canada is not in US jurisdiction.

    31. Re:Torture and kidnappings by Tom · · Score: 1

      Actually, the Great Wall is generally thought to have been a smashing success. That's the main reason it was kept in shape and extended for hundreds of years.

      While it did not prevent every Mongol attack, it dramatically reduced mobility of nomad forces, while providing trade, logistics and troop movements to the Chinese. It was also never actually defeated. Nobody every conquered the wall, and it was used defensively up until 1933 (!) against the Japanese.

      If you understand the wall for what it was intended to be - not a castle but a strategic position - then you also understand that it was highly effective in that role.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    32. Re:Torture and kidnappings by jabuzz · · Score: 1

      There was me thinking that the US constitution allowed the president to pardon people. So Trump is right in saying he can use her as a pawn, because it is pretty clear she is guilty, which via the mechanism of a pardon gives Trump the leverage needed to use her as a pawn.

    33. Re: Torture and kidnappings by n0nsensical · · Score: 1

      I can see you know the same amount of history as Teflon Don, since in 1644 the Manchus crossed the Great Wall and conquered Beijing, establishing the Qing Dynasty that would last until its own incompetent leadership refusing to join the modern world was overthrown by European colonial powers.

    34. Re:Torture and kidnappings by ghoul · · Score: 1

      No you didnt!!! Al extradition cases have political discretion and prosecutorial discretion. This had to be cleared by the Canadian govt. in advance. Canada just miscalculated. They were taking this hostage to bargain on the China-Canada FTA.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    35. Re:Torture and kidnappings by ghoul · · Score: 1

      Step 3) China forcs down the plane carrying the diplomats. This is not som 3rd rate power (like cough cough Canada) you are dealing with.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    36. Re:Torture and kidnappings by ghoul · · Score: 1

      Neither does China but it will take hostages the terrorists are willing to trade for.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    37. Re:Torture and kidnappings by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      To walk through US jurisdiction knowing you're wanted?

      Wow... A foreign sovereign nation is a US jurisdiction. Your comment really takes the cake.

    38. Re:Torture and kidnappings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Credibly accused? By a country which has been proven time and again to engage in cyber espionage and sabotage, without providing any evidence whatsoever? CREDIBLY ACCUSED? Wow, you're funny. American much?

    39. Re:Torture and kidnappings by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Huawei is owned by the Chinese government and is credibly accused of spying. If they don't want to do business with the US and thus are able to ignore our laws, that's one thing. To walk through US jurisdiction knowing you're wanted?

      Canada is US jurisdiction now?

      Huawei isn't owned by the Chinese government. There are some links, mostly with top execs being members of the Party. Obviously that's terrible, US tech moguls are never involved with the government. The NSA had to hack them itself!

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    40. Re:Torture and kidnappings by n0nsensical · · Score: 1

      You missed the point. The Chinese Communist Party is a terrorist organization holding one entire country hostage, namely China, as well as several citizens of relatively free Nations.

    41. Re:Torture and kidnappings by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      Can Trump use her as a pawn? Of course. As you say, the presidential pardon power clearly gives him that ability. Should Trump use her as a pawn? Should Trump proclaim to the world that American justice is openly for sale for the right price? Well, that's another matter.

    42. Re:Torture and kidnappings by penandpaper · · Score: 1

      which is why he keeps getting slapped down by the courts.

      I am not sure this highlights what you think it highlights. Since the 60's the judicial branch has been overstepping their authority. Universal Injunctions are a really bad judicial practice. It doesn't make sense that one judge in one district can cripple the ability of the Federal government to perform its duty. It puts a partisan twist on the court and now judges are looked at through partisan lenses. Legal technicalities shouldn't be the concern of most people.

      Since Trump there has been a surge in their use. Showcasing the use of universal injunctions against a president as controversial as Trump doesn't mean much and so far the SCOTUS has upheld Trump's decisions on several occasions (still many pending or in process). We won't know for certainty until those cases are finish.

      Trump has obeyed court rulings: How does that make him authoritarian? Obama was slapped down by the courts as well for overreaching executive authority. Does that make him an authoritarian?

      Personally, I like Justice Thomas opinion on the matter:

      Injunctions that prohibit the Executive Branch from applying a law or policy against anyonehave become increasingly common. District courts, including the one here, have begun imposing universal injunctions without considering their authority to grant such sweeping relief. These injunctions are beginning to take a toll on the federal court system—preventing legal questions from percolating through the federal courts, encouraging forum shopping, and making every case a national emergency for the courts and for the Executive Branch.

    43. Re:Torture and kidnappings by penandpaper · · Score: 1

      They don't care about the fallout this is having on Canada.

      Basically, never fuck with China. Do not enforce any law or treaty with another country that may disrespect China in any way shape or form. China is above the law. China is above any international relationship or treaty. If you do China will escalate by arresting and executing your citizens.

      Got it.

    44. Re: Torture and kidnappings by Tom · · Score: 1

      If you mean the battle of Shanhai Pass, there was no siege battle at the wall. But of course you knew that.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    45. Re: Torture and kidnappings by n0nsensical · · Score: 1

      I didn't say there was a battle, I said they crossed it, so what good did it do?

    46. Re:Torture and kidnappings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which also isn't the point. Extradition has been fairly rare in these types of cases, and almost never done.

      "The US rarely arrests senior businesspeople, US or foreign, for alleged crimes committed by their companies. Corporate managers are usually arrested for their alleged personal crimes (such as embezzlement, bribery, or violence) rather than their company’s alleged malfeasance. Yes, corporate managers should be held to account for their company’s malfeasance, up to and including criminal charges; but to start this practice with a leading Chinese businessperson, rather than the dozens of culpable US CEOs and CFOs, is a stunning provocation to the Chinese government, business community, and public.

      Meng is charged with violating US sanctions on Iran. Yet consider her arrest in the context of the large number of companies, US and non-US, that have violated US sanctions against Iran and other countries. In 2011, for example, JP Morgan Chase paid $88.3 million in fines in 2011 for violating US sanctions against Cuba, Iran, and Sudan. Yet Jamie Dimon wasn’t grabbed off a plane and whisked into custody.

      And JP Morgan Chase was hardly alone in violating US sanctions. Since 2010, the following major financial institutions paid fines for violating US sanctions: Banco do Brasil, Bank of America, Bank of Guam, Bank of Moscow, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Barclays, BNP Paribas, Clearstream Banking, Commerzbank, Compass, Crédit Agricole, Deutsche Bank, HSBC, ING, Intesa Sanpaolo, JP Morgan Chase, National Bank of Abu Dhabi, National Bank of Pakistan, PayPal, RBS (ABN Amro), Société Générale, Toronto-Dominion Bank, Trans-Pacific National Bank (now known as Beacon Business Bank), Standard Chartered, and Wells Fargo.

      None of the CEOs or CFOs of these sanction-busting banks was arrested and taken into custody for these violations. In all of these cases, the corporation – rather than an individual manager – was held accountable. Nor were they held accountable for the pervasive lawbreaking in the lead-up to or aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis, for which the banks paid a staggering $243 billion in fines, according to a recent tally. In light of this record, Meng’s arrest is a shocking break with practice. Yes, hold CEOs and CFOs accountable, but start at home in order to avoid hypocrisy, self-interest disguised as high principle, and the risk of inciting a new global conflict."

    47. Re:Torture and kidnappings by ghoul · · Score: 1

      Woosh!!!! It went over your head. I was hinting that Canada's actions are terrorist.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    48. Re:Torture and kidnappings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      America NEVER spies. Everyone else does. America. Land of the free, home of the brave. America.

    49. Re:Torture and kidnappings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was me thinking that the US constitution allowed the president to pardon people. So Trump is right in saying he can use her as a pawn, because it is pretty clear she is guilty, which via the mechanism of a pardon gives Trump the leverage needed to use her as a pawn.

      On behalf of angry Canadians, let me explain some things to you ...

      1) If the US is going to use treaties with long standing allies to play games like this, then why should we trust anything the US does or honor our treaties if the Great Cheeto is going to fiddle with the system? If we can't trust you, then we won't -- our only recourse would be to assume that since America is helmed by a lying sack of shit, then you're all lying sacks of shit.

      2) You should expect American citizens to be used as pawns all around the world, ruthlessly and without mercy. Sadly, you will suddenly find a lot of Americans with guns pointed at their heads reading into a camera. Do you really think this is a good idea?

      3) What to you think happens to the US, and US trade if every country on the planet assumes you're just going to fuck them over to get what you want?

      I no longer will travel to the US, I've started checking labels to be sure it's not a product of the US, and I'm afraid I can no longer offer any concern or sympathy for US lives, because POTUS has demonstrated he's such a single minded asshole that our rage at the entire USA is inevitable.

      So, really, go ahead, use extradition treaties with other countries so you can have your pawns in your trade war. Just don't think that it won't have lasting effects on your friendships.

      Me, I'm looking into trips to Europe, a Korean made car, and anything which doesn't enrich America ... because fuck all y'all and your asshole of a president.

    50. Re: Torture and kidnappings by Tom · · Score: 1

      The construction of the Great Wall began in the 7th century BC.

      So you're basically saying that something that was used as a defensive structure for more than 2500 years is no good because you found one example where a commander surrendered and let the enemy through?

      Congratulations, you've discovered a type of argument that Trump would shy away from.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    51. Re: Torture and kidnappings by penandpaper · · Score: 1

      you've discovered a type of argument

      Normally after a discovery we would name it after the one who discovered it. In that spirit we could call it, nonsensical... ... ...

      I am sorry I will let myself out.

    52. Re:Torture and kidnappings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Found the chinese shill.

    53. Re:Torture and kidnappings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ghoul, I'm beginning to wonder if you are a paid Chinese troll. Seriously.

      "They were taking this hostage to bargain on the China-Canada FTA."

      OK, yeah, this makes sense (no, not really). Canada tries to make a power play move on a country that is much larger than Canada economically and militarily. No FTA happens unless China wants it to happen and taking a "Chinese hostage" will ensure that China will get pissy about any Free Trade Agreement. BTW, China taking Canadian hostages results in Canada getting pissy about the same FTA. So hostages are counter-productive no matter how you play it.

      "Political discretion and prosecutorial discretion" happen after the fact, after the arrest. Not before. You don't know what you are talking about and you are spewing nonsense. Maybe just let the adults talk, hey?

    54. Re:Torture and kidnappings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She hasn't broken any Canadian laws. The very fact that Canada is holding her for extradition when Canadian law clearly states that extradition is only for crimes which are crimes in both countries, is a human right violation.

      Except Canada does have trade santions on Iran.

    55. Re:Torture and kidnappings by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      What rule of law?

      Open a newspaper for once in your life, it is called an extradition treaty.

      You don't worry about big scary China's mean threats, you just fucking follow the rules you agreed to follow with your allies, and if the Chinese don't like it, expect the future to have a smaller amount of cheap trinkets from China than the past couple decades had.

      If you don't even follow your treaties with your closest allies, you won't have close allies, you'll just be a vassal of whoever's threats you cringed at.

  2. Re:It's amazing how ridiculous this is. by Aighearach · · Score: 0

    No, we never liked you, please go away and shut up until you need somebody to save your dumb ass from invasion, then we'll come back and show you what color freedom bleeds.

  3. How much money to negotiate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After of the extradition, i think that the accused is very rich and could pay a big fine for the American justice: worth several US$ millions.

    Huawei leads the world of the mobiles and the American government wants to charge it.

    1. Re:How much money to negotiate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huawei is a joke. Anyone shilling for their shitty Android spyware devices should be shot on sight just for being too stupid for 2019.

  4. Communism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you mess with a Chinese company and it's executives, you are messing with the CCP and PLA. It's almost as though extradition would be an act of war....

    Fuck it, bring it on! Bitch broke the law!

  5. Re: Actually? We KNOW Trump broke MANY, MANY LAWS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Care to enumerate any of these multiple felonies and lies, jackass? Oh, right, you can't, because every time the fake corporate media drags out another made up pile of crap accusation it is disproven within a day or two. And programmed NPC dumbasses like you just keep eating that up too.

  6. Buh-Bye Huawei by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All I can say is feel free to bail the US market and take your (IMHO) crummy servers and network junk with you. I would have a better opinion, but after the complete pogrom on unlocked bootloaders, I lost respect for this company.

    Yes, there are a lot of allegations, but where there is smoke, there is fire. Canada isn't a country that buckles to the US unless something is there, and Huawei has had complaints in other areas around the globe as well.

    If they only do business in Asia, fine. One less potential security threat I have to worry about.

    1. Re: Buh-Bye Huawei by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canada isn't a country that buckles to the US unless something is there...
      Nope. Canada is USA's bitch. Take it from a Canadian. Our government would actually risk its own people to support America in what is basically a trade dispute.

    2. Re:Buh-Bye Huawei by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canada acts like the US lackey and had a long history of doing so: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avro_Canada_CF-105_Arrow

  7. Torture and kidnappings = CHINA'S #1 PRODUCT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't paint them as some sort of liberal privacy-defending EFF-type company "refusing to play ball" with the NSA lol. They ACTIVELY SPY on their users for the Chinese Communist Party and put tentacles on the ground worldwide.
    Huawei's fraudulent ownership of a shell company they refuse to acknowledge despite ironclad evidence is more proof of what arrogant morons they are, even more than thinking you can fly through Canada with a warrant for your arrest.
    They deserved to be caught and Meng deserves to be extradited to face charges like any other fraud. That China is railroading Canadian citizens to use as hostages, like Russia with Whelan, it's just more obvious evidence.

    This isn't a legitimate business fighting the good fight for consumers and being screwed by the nutty Trump administration, this is a spy tentacle caught walking through an airport like it's nothing. Arrogant ChiCom princess shit.
    China's government is a pack of assholes trying to flex and it's going to end badly for them. Trump is incompetent and self-defeating, this has nothing to do with that racist asshole's issues, this is about rule of law.
    Lock her up, Trump will be in there soon enough also.

    1. Re:Torture and kidnappings = CHINA'S #1 PRODUCT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Tentacles"? That's kind of a tell.

  8. Re: Actually? We KNOW Trump broke MANY, MANY LAWS by jpaine619 · · Score: 0

    Disproven like Trump "disproved" that he had multiple business dealings with Russia to the American people, lying to your fat faggot face over and over again, lol? Tell it to the warden faggot, Trump has 20+ open investigations. He's fucked.

    You want to get fucked too, I'm sure we can work something out with the inmates at ADX Florence to accommodate your faggot traitor ass as well, Junior.

    For fuck's sake, just come out of the closet already. You are absolutely FIXATED on homosexual sex. It's all "faggot" this and "faggot" that... What percentage of your day is spent not thinking about gay sex? 2%? 3%?

    Don't deny it.. Your actions speak louder than any possible words of denial... Come out, get a husband, drop the rabid anger, and be happy.

  9. Act of Terror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can't get concessions from trade talk, threaten to kill the hostage [politico.com] (in Guantanamo prison, perhaps.)

    USA a mad terrorist state!

  10. Broken Summit Canada-China. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    China could suspend the silicon's market with Canada for the next decades.

    By example,

    1. Huawei won't export their Chinese products to Canada for the next decades.
    2. China won't import Canadian products for the next decades.

  11. Canada will refuse extradition, because of Trump by ZombieCatInABox · · Score: 0, Troll

    Soon there will be an extradition hearing. The judge will refuse extradition to the U.S. on the base that Trump's comment about using Ms. Meng Wanzhou as a bargaining chip infers the possibility of interference with the judicial process in the United States, therefore denying her the right to a fair trial.

    That's what her lawyers will plead, and the judge will agree with them. Extradition will be denied, and Ms. Meng Wanzhou will go free.

    Maybe next time the orange dipship will learn to keep his Putin-cock-sucking mouth shut. But I doubt it.

  12. Re:Canada will refuse extradition, because of Trum by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    The judge will refuse extradition to the U.S. on the base that Trump's comment about using Ms. Meng Wanzhou as a bargaining chip infers the possibility of interference with the judicial process

    If the judge has strong evidence Ms. Meng is guilty, wouldn't that override Trump's odd statements? Probable guilt level should be the key factor, not what political leaders say.

  13. Re:It's amazing how ridiculous this is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dear Murica... we used to like you. A lot.

    ...pre-Internet, when we were young and naive, before we discovered that every ideal you pretend to portray is nothing more than a facade which allows you to rape the world for resources so as to allow your bloated population to consume the Earth.

  14. Fake News by ghoul · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Huawei is not owned by the Chinese govt. Its owner served in the military so did a bunch of founders of American companies including McDonalds, IBM and AT&T.
    Huawei has got research grants from the Chinese equivalent of NSF so has Facebook, Google , Cisco and Apple.
    Further there have been no cases of Huawei equipment being used to spy whereas we know for a fact that CISCO backdoors have been used to spy on Angela Merkel.
    Given these facts it is pretty clear that the opposition to Huawei equipment is not because the Chinese wll use it to spy and rather that it makes it more difficult for the NSA to spy. They may actually have to earn their Govt. salaries and we know that is anathema to Govt. Servants like the NSA and the CIA. They would much rather use backdoors (which CISCO cannot refuse to put in under US law)

    --
    **Life is too short to be serious**
    1. Re:Fake News by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Makes little to no difference in the argument. No country, I repeat,. NO COUNTRY, should allow another country to control their digital infrastructure, all of it should be locally made. In terms of seeking to physically and sexually abuse the daughter of the head of Hauwei as some sort of sick game, there will be a real price to pay. You do not get to be the head of a major Chinese corporation without being tied to the Chinese government. Likely the abuse will be met with a lethal response targeted at US executives, can't arrest them, fine, they will succumb to a range of select Chinese herbs and spices.

      Canada will pay in trade and exclusions, US will pay in top end corporate board members of equal rank, well, passing on, can not arrest because China does not have vassal governments all over the world, well, China can block assassination attempts far more readily than the US. There will be prices to pay amongst the US elite and make no mistake.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    2. Re:Fake News by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      You're promoting nationalism as a positive. Did you realize that, or just suddenly break out in Trumpism?

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  15. Re:Canada will refuse extradition, because of Trum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, because, whether the judge thinks she is guilty or not doesn't matter. What matters if whether the judge thinks, if the defendant is transferred, whether she will get a fair trial. (She isn't on trial in Canada.) A political leader saying he will interfere with the trial to use the defendant as a bargaining chip proves she cannot have a fair trial. Therefore only a seriously defective judge would allow her to be taken to the USA.

  16. Re:It's amazing how ridiculous this is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, we won't.

    That's why they're so fucking terrified. We're not going to save them a third time.

  17. Re: Actually? We KNOW Trump broke MANY, MANY LAWS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nazi crybaby jpaine is triggered by homosexuality, news at 11. In other news, the retarded Drumpf administration today admitted they colluded with Russia, but so what right? And in sports...

  18. Rule of Law is broken by ghoul · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The fact that China is taking hostages is pretty strong proof that Rule of Law in Canada is broken and Canada needs to be reminded that Political hostage taking works both ways. Meng is not even accused of breaking any Canadian law and extradition is for crimes which are crimes in both countries. The sanctions she is accused of violating are illegal as they are against the JCPOA a UN treaty and neither Canada nor China has agreed to those sanctions so holding Meng is a purely political decision. The arrest had to be signed off on by the Canadian justice minister as will any extradition so it is a political arrest. China understands when to play nice and when to show countries that political hostage taking both ways.

    --
    **Life is too short to be serious**
    1. Re:Rule of Law is broken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How does President Xi's cock taste?

    2. Re:Rule of Law is broken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rule of law is broken in Canada because they are following a law they made!!!!!!!!

      Is that like China who retaliates by executing Canadian citizens?

      China is the new overlord of the world and every country better damn well appreciate what that means or else they will fucking murder you.

  19. Proof? by ghoul · · Score: 0

    Rants by AC are just that rants.

    --
    **Life is too short to be serious**
  20. When you break the law, you face charges. Period. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Canada holds people wanted for legal holds, she violated US law, our partners in Canada detained her. If Chinese are too dumb to know the US and Canada are allied and have extradition treaties, IT SUCKS TO BE YOU MENG.

  21. Re:It's amazing how ridiculous this is. by ghoul · · Score: 1

    I think US owed the French for 1783 and 1812. They repaid in 1914 and 1942.
    Also in Vietnam the US screwed up the mess left by the French even worse than the French did.
    So neither does France expect US to come to its aid and nor does it have great confidence is USA's ability to do so without screwing things up.
    There is a reason French troops are not inside the unified NATO command and why France keeps asking Germany to lets setup an independent European Army.

    --
    **Life is too short to be serious**
  22. US laws on foreign soil by BlueCoder · · Score: 0

    Yet again the US is applying it's laws to conduct happening on foreign soil. By this principle Saudi Arabia could extradite me. Further politicians could get laws passed in other countries that would be unconstitutional here. How long before a US citizen is extradited to Germany for selling Nazi antiquities.

    I don't see how any other free nation would endorse an extradition like this.

    1. Re:US laws on foreign soil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet again the US is applying it's laws to conduct happening on foreign soil.

      It's called a treaty. The US and Canada have made many covering all sorts of cross border matters, including extradition of criminal suspects.

      By this principle Saudi Arabia could extradite me.

      The US does not have an extradition treaty with Saudi Arabia. Not sure about Canada, but I doubt that they do either.

      How long before a US citizen is extradited to Germany for selling Nazi antiquities.

      Generally speaking, the crime needs to be a crime in both jurisdictions and of a serious nature. So crimes like murder, kidnapping and rape qualify but selling antiques does not.

      I don't see how any other free nation would endorse an extradition like this.

      Sanctions busting is a serious crime that undermines US foreign policy and there are plenty of nations out there willing to do the US a solid in return for future favors. Handing over foreign criminals is an easy and low cost way to gain favors.

    2. Re:US laws on foreign soil by Yaztromo · · Score: 2

      Yet again the US is applying it's laws to conduct happening on foreign soil.

      No they aren't. She isn't charged with her company violating the US's sanctions against Iran -- she's charged with lying to a potential investor while on US soil by misrepresenting her companies business with Iran.

      That's fraud, and it was committed while she was in the US. You don't get a free pass from prosecution just because you leave the country after committing a crime there. And this wasn't a surprise to her -- she was apprehended in Vancouver while on her way to Mexico, having booked travel to specifically bypass travel through the US, knowing she was going to be arrested if she set foot in the country. What she didn't expect was that the US was ready with an extradition request when she landed in Canada.

      The US is applying their laws in this case against conduct that happened on their own soil. Should they have sufficient evidence of the crime she's actually accused of (fraud), then there is no reason why they shouldn't be applying their laws in this case.

      Yaz

    3. Re:US laws on foreign soil by ghoul · · Score: 2

      Yeah she may have technically lied to say that her company was no longer doing business with Iran. However business leaders lie all the time- AT&T , Microsoft and CISCO have been found to be lying about not providing backdoors to the NSA. None of their CEOs are being charged with fraud. Fact of the matter is that the lie is forced by an illegal sanctions regime. Its like prosecuting the guy who smuggles people out of North Korea with Human Trafficking. Technically correct but totally bullshit. This is a totally political case. Plus Canada does not have sanctions on Iran so its still not a crime in Canada so extradition doesnt apply. All Huawei needs to do to make this case go away is add backdoors for the NSA.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    4. Re:US laws on foreign soil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus Canada does not have sanctions on Iran so its still not a crime in Canada so extradition doesnt apply. All Huawei needs to do to make this case go away is add backdoors for the NSA.

      Yes, Canada does have sanctions on Iran.

      https://www.international.gc.ca/world-monde/international_relations-relations_internationales/sanctions/current-actuelles.aspx?lang=eng

      Please check facts before engaging mouth.

    5. Re:US laws on foreign soil by penandpaper · · Score: 1

      However business leaders lie all the time

      Let's assume that everything you say is true (it's not as others have pointed out your ignorance). How does this in anyway absolve her of criminality?

      The actions taken by Canada and the US are legal under a mutual treaty against an accused. If the evidence presented to the Canadian courts do not satisfy the judge then she will be released.

      What are you actually saying here? That because others might have broken a law we should have lawlessness? Is that how it works in China? Sounds like a recipe for corruption and disregard to the Rule of Law.

    6. Re:US laws on foreign soil by ghoul · · Score: 1

      What I am saying is there is no such thing as Rule of Law. Its a myth. There is prosecutorial discretion and who the powers in charge want get charged get prosecuted and those they dont are given a pass or do you really think 13% of the population commits 50% of the crimes in the US?

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    7. Re:US laws on foreign soil by penandpaper · · Score: 1

      You are insane defending two completely contradictory positions. The government has limited resources and as such must apply those resources effectively. A prosecutor not following up on a weak case, understanding deterrence value, and not part of an overall government priority means "no rule of law" to you?

      What is not acceptable in your definition of "rule of law"? Seriously. I have no idea what standard of law you are trying to bully for. Is it wrong to faithfullly enforce laws or not? Is it ok to ignore a law because others break the same law or not?

      do you really think 13% of the population commits 50% of the crimes in the US?

      I can look at the evidence and understand that the situation is more complex than those pushing narratives would believe, like you. Violent crime is disproportionately committed by a certain demographic. How you interpret those statistics is not related to your definition of "prosecutorial discretion" or your definition of "rule of law".

    8. Re:US laws on foreign soil by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

      You sure do sound like Trump there..

    9. Re:US laws on foreign soil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The government has limited resources and as such must apply those resources effectively."

      Yup. They have been very effective in preventing companies / countries from competing, benefiting all. People in their own country getting shot a few dozens at a time? not a priority.

    10. Re:US laws on foreign soil by ghoul · · Score: 1

      Once you have admitted that selective prosecution happens based upon "government priority" it is not uncalled for to ask the US govt to not make it a priority to help CISCO shareholders and stop hiding behind "We cant do anything. Its Rule of law".

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    11. Re:US laws on foreign soil by ghoul · · Score: 1

      Trump is far smarter than the left gives him credit for. He provokes people through nonsense statements so that the opposition is distracted while he keeps plugging on. At the same time he has protected himself by appointing a Christian Taliban as his Vice President. Nobody is going to replace Trump for noone not even Nancy want Ayatollah Pence in charge. For one he would refuse to meet Nancy without his wife present.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    12. Re:US laws on foreign soil by penandpaper · · Score: 1

      Name a government that doesn't do that in any regard?

    13. Re:US laws on foreign soil by ghoul · · Score: 1

      Everybody does it but only the West claims not to do it and does it. Hypocrisy thy name is Western Media

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    14. Re:US laws on foreign soil by penandpaper · · Score: 1

      I am just looking for you ideal candidate for rule of law. No one claims the west is perfect but it's a lot better than others/most. You conflate western legal system and philosophy with "western media". WTF is that?

      You seem to imply that the government making, say opioids, a priority of enforcement because it is a high profile issue that affect many people in the community means that every decision by law enforcement is politically motivated. You also don't seem to understand the idea of "faithfully executing the laws".

      I really do not understand your position. Should the US enforce US law or not? Should Canada uphold international treaty they sign as law or not? It sounds like you are saying "No they shouldn't' because everyone breaks the law and I don't like that they upheld the law against this particular person because China." which seems like you are advocating for corruption and poor standards of justice. Maybe that works for China but I don't like it.

  23. apologist faggot logs in to lie, it's still a lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    When a ChiCom apologist faggot logs in to lie, it's still just a lie. Face it, the party owns Huawei. There's no denying it any more than denying Meng will face trial for Huawei's frauds. You're not changing anything, sorry.

  24. Your crybaby act changes nothing Ghoul. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WRONG, the US and Canada have strong extradition treaties AND the evidence is in hand that Huawei committed massive fraud. She's an officer of that company, fair game. Your crybaby act changes nothing Ghoul.

    1. Re:Your crybaby act changes nothing Ghoul. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      THEY DO NOT RUN FROM THE CHARGES. They hire lawyers to defeat them. They don't try to pretend the US law enforcement isn't going to eventually get them, then fly through CANADA like a fucking MORON CHINA PRINCESS.

      Huawei didn't want to face the courts, so their officers are fair game. Don't like it? MOVE TO CHINA, DO NOT COME BACK.

    2. Re:Your crybaby act changes nothing Ghoul. by ghoul · · Score: 1

      All she is accused of is telling HSBC that her company no longer does business with Iran and have HSBC process their payments. The US has a stranglehold on international bank transfers and this kind of subterfuge is necessitated to bypass the illegal Iran sanctions which are against the JCPOA (a UN treaty). China could just as well prosecute the HSBC officials for enforcing these illegal sanctions.
      If a privateer was blocking the Lawrence waterway and a merchant captain lied to get past it with a legitimate cargo and then you prosecute the captain for lying that is what is happening here.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
  25. Trump is too weak to do anything, his boasts = bfd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trump's weak threats of interfering mean nothing, he can't interfere any more than he can shut down the Mueller investigation. It LOOKS bad, dumb as hell, but legally he's shown zero ability to affect court outcomes despite all efforts.

  26. HUAWEI IS OWNED BY THE COMMUNIST PARTY OF CHINA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    You can whine, snivel, cry out, lie, but you will not change the fact that the Chinese Communist Party OWNS AND CONTROLS HUAWEI, and Huawei feeds Chinese intel with their spying operations. Huawei = Chinese govt. spyware.

    We know you love ramen and anime and all that shit, this has nothing to do with it. Go catch pokemons, nobody cares. This is about Huawei being caught in frauds, and officers of that company facing trial for it. Period.

    1. Re:HUAWEI IS OWNED BY THE COMMUNIST PARTY OF CHINA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neat. Please provide proof of your supposed facts.

    2. Re:HUAWEI IS OWNED BY THE COMMUNIST PARTY OF CHINA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We know you love ramen and anime and all that shit, this has nothing to do with it. Go catch pokemons, nobody cares.

      WTF does Japan have to do with any of this?

  27. Re: It's amazing how ridiculous this is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesn't stop Trudeau getting on his knees to please the retard in chief.

  28. Re:Extradition is a political decision. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wrong. The political decision Canada made was to make Rule of Law the norm, and we signed an extradition treaty to enact that.

    Big Giant Orange Head opened his big mouth and is making Canada reconsider. Seriously, all he had to do was shut his cake-hole, but Oh No! BGOH never shuts his cake-hole, does he?

    Extradition based upon laws and evidence is Canada's preferred route. The intervention of the Minister or Prime Minister to block extradition would be political. We'll see if BGOH has poisoned the well so thoroughly as to cause that.

    Canada has no extradition treaty with Venezuela, dip-shit. Typical Deplorable logic, tell a lie, use it to support a lie, then use that to justify Deplorable actions.

  29. Re:It's amazing how ridiculous this is. by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 2

    Sorry but the US came into WW1 in 1917. Late just like they were for WW2.

  30. Re:It's amazing how ridiculous this is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmmmm....that's funny because the last time I checked Canada, the UK, and a bunch of other countries were out in the forefront fighting off the invaders for years while the US sat back and made money off of arms sales...WWI and WWII.

    Also, 9/11. The US closed it's airspace and Canada left itself open to attack to land all those planes from Europe that were well past the turn around point. If we didn't they would have all crashed into the Atlantic. How quickly a lot of you south of us seem to forget that.

  31. Re:It's amazing how ridiculous this is. by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

    In the 20th century, that colour was Soviet red and yellow. The USSR did the vast majority of the bleeding, at the direct exhortation of the UK and USA. Per capita you could make an argument for Poland, the Baltic countries and some of the rest of eastern Europe to join the club.

    Yes, it's ironic that the USSR is responsible for the preservation of the free world from the only serious threat it faced in living memory.

  32. Re:It's amazing how ridiculous this is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Incorrect little frenchboy. If it wasn't for the U.S. the french would be speaking german. The greatest achievement of the french during WWI and WWII was to be the first in line to surrender to the germans. Hell, the greatest military victory of the french in the last 300 years was when they sank that green peace ship that was moored up in that harbor. Twenty adequately trained "commands" heavily armed with superior made British and Israeli automatic weapons managed to take out a unarmed ship, in a harbor, defended only by a dozen or so stoned ass hippies in the middle of the night. Yee Ha. Go french military.

    But don't worry french boy, if you got your ass in trouble again and quickly surrendered to what ever pack of boy scouts landed on your shore. Uncle Sam will show up and bail your ass out, again. It is what friends are for.

  33. Re:Extradition is a political decision. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Venezuela and Canada do not have an extradition treaty. Canada and the US does have an extradition treaty.

    That's the difference.

  34. Re:The system works, crybaby idiot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't know its from it's

    His name is BlueCoder not BlueWriter. Frankly, I wouldn't trust a coder that did know its from it's.

  35. Re: It's amazing how ridiculous this is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shush with your reality checks. Red blooded Americans won WW1, WW2, and all the other wars too. There isnâ(TM)t anything worth thinking about beyond our borders. MAGA!

  36. Re:Canada will refuse extradition, because of Trum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Post a video of Trump using the words "bargaining chip" or "pawn" when directly referring to Wanzhou. There isn't one. Journalists made it up. Easy to prove me wrong. Find it. Post a link.

    You were played like a puppet on a string.

    Look at how well you dance.

  37. Re:business dealings with Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why did the Orange Turd lie about all throughout the campaign if it is legitimate business.

    In no way is Drumpf a leader of anything except perhaps conmen.

    numbnuts

  38. Claiming jurisdiction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... enforce the rule of law.

    Is this "we don't partner with businesses that are active in Iran and you lied to us" or the USA selfishly claiming jurisdiction like it did over the internet, Cuban cigars and New Zealand houses?

  39. Re:Extradition is a political decision. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ^^ Mod up factual.

  40. In your dreams, Murican! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The US basically was on the Nazi side and a Nazi country themselves until nearly the very end, when they noticed that not only the French resistance and British bombers were winning, but the Soviets were overrunning Germany.

    So they quickly stormed to the front, kicked over the last bucket, and acted like they did it all-anone, so everybody would forget what side they had actually supported.

    Then they promplty went on to hire as many Nazi scientists and concentration camp human experiment doctors as they could, renamed their own concentration camps into "black sites", acted like their Ãoebermensch propaganda was " just superhero comics", told everyone how they are the world's saviors,

    and went on to wage imperialist wars against literally ALL the countries in one uninterrupted stream since 1945.

    That is the hard reality that you US-Americans never get told in your history "education".
    Just like North Koreans believe Kim-Yong Il is God, you believe this.

    1. Re:In your dreams, Murican! by penandpaper · · Score: 1

      Good gravy man have you read any history of the US?

      The US basically was on the Nazi side and a Nazi country themselves until nearly the very end

      No. Roosevelt wasn't a fan of the Nazi's hence his support for the UK and the Soviet Union through supply and trade before the US entrance in the war. The US had stronger cultural and historical ties to the UK than Germany and the policy of the government reflected that.

      The American people are a diverse group and part of that group includes German migrants who were sympathetic toward their Fatherland. Through WW1 to WW2 there was a stigma attached to German migrants because of the wars. Speaking German was a socially unacceptable. German cuisine and culture were shamed. Why do you think American beer is piss water compared to European beer? Because Germans brought their beer and when Germans were stigmatized during the wars so too was their beer. The beer industry suffered horribly because it was associated with Germany.

      The times were different and so was the worlds understanding of race during that time. There were many new ideas being presented that the public were wrestling with. Darwin, eugenics, phrenology, etc had a role in competing on what a society should do or be and how it should handle different races co-mingling. The Nazi's took those ideas to the logical conclusion of extermination. Those ideas and the Nazi final solution are against the founding principles of the US. Remember, the civil war was fought only 40 years before WW1. The US was still trying to figure how to integrate while there were a lot of racists because the wounds of the Civil War were still fresh.

      American companies did conduct business with Nazi Germany, like IBM. Just like Apple and China today. The US can recognize and acknowledge that.

      promplty went on to hire as many Nazi scientists .

      The US didn't want those scientists to go over to the Soviet Union because it seemed like war with the Soviets would follow after the defeat of the Nazi's and Imperial Japan.

      Do you think the Soviet Union under Stalin was a better actor of morality than the US at the time? The world isn't a perfect place and you passing judgement outside of time in the comfort of hindsight without having worry about the decision you come up with is ridiculous. While the people living then making those choices understood that thousands would die to their decision and maybe millions more would die if they chose wrong.

      I shouldn't have responded to an ignorant troll AC but ugh. ...

  41. that is not us jurisdiction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    canada is not yet a US state/colony

  42. Re: Actually? We KNOW Trump broke MANY, MANY LAWS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, it's not us: it's you. Really, it is.

  43. Tentacles==Manga Much? by ghoul · · Score: 1

    It must be so ronery to be trolling from your moms basement.

    --
    **Life is too short to be serious**
  44. NO geography in school by ghoul · · Score: 1

    I just saw my teenagers High school syllabus. There is no Geography subject!!!! And this is one of the best school districts in the country. No wonder Americans think Canada is part of US ;)

    --
    **Life is too short to be serious**
  45. Re:Canada will refuse extradition, because of Trum by LostMyAccount · · Score: 1

    I think the judge would have to do more explain why he thinks she won't get a fair trial in rational terms. Trumps rants aren't relevant because he doesn't control the prosecution or the judicial system she will be tried in. There are laws, procedures and treaties involved as well as the risk of precedent -- it's not a cocktail party where you can simply say "but omg, Trump, it's so unfair". If she can claim the judicial system won't give her a fair trial, couldn't most any extradition defendant in Canada, especially if they're poor or a minority, make the same claim and with better evidence that it is unfair to those people?

    I seriously doubt a judge in Canada can get away with simply repudiating the US judicial system as unfair. There's no doubt it has unfair qualities in terms of access for poor people, but that's not what's in question. Trump has had ample opportunities to interfere with the Mueller investigation LEGALLY by pardoning Manafort, et al but hasn't done it, and he has a personal stake in all of these people getting off the hook.

  46. Re: Actually? We KNOW Trump broke MANY, MANY LAWS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You just want to gargle his balls, you sick pervert!

  47. Re:Canada will refuse extradition, because of Trum by ZombieCatInABox · · Score: 0

    https://www.reuters.com/articl...

    Trump clearly said that he would intervene if he tought this was good for the country. That's the President of the United States, clearly and unambiguously claiming that he would interfere with the judicial process.In any Rule of Law country (which Canada is), it would be more than enough evidence to get any legal case thrown out of court, including cases like murder.

    But I'm sure you'll just claim again that Reuters, one of the most well established and professional news organizations on the planet, just made that all up, actually never showed up in the white house, never conducted this interview with the president himself, and just published a completely made-up fake-news to the entire planet, that curiously, Trump himself never denied publicly.

    God you rabid, blind, fanatical Trump worshipers are pathetic. Now go ahead, little Trump troll army, hurry-up and burry this post with troll or flamebait downmodding before someone else can read it, just like you did with my OP. For a bunch that keep bitching and whining about the fact that the evil liberals and "SJWs" keep suppressing your viewpoint and things they disagree with, you all seem exceedingly good at it yourselves fucking hypocrits.

  48. Re:Extradition is a political decision. by ZombieCatInABox · · Score: 0

    The U.S. and Canada have an extradition treaty. Under that treaty, If any country emits an international arrest warrant, the other country must honor it. This is followed by a judicial hearing, where a judge will decide whether extradition to the country that emitted the warrant will be granted or not. Counsel of both parties (the country that emitted the warrant, and the defendant) will plead their cases during that hearing.

    The prosecution must tell the court what accusations they intend to bring against the defendant, and the evidence they have gathered so far. Among other things, they must provide evidence that the crime the defendant is accused of is also a crime in the country where the arrest was made. They must also assure the court that if found guilty, the defendant will not be sentenced to the death penalty, if the deaf penalty doesn't exist in the country where the arrest happened. And finally, they must assure the court that the trial in the country asking for extradition will be fair, independant, and follow the Rule of Law.

    On their side, the defense must cast doubt on any of the points above. If they succeed, then the judge will not grant extradition, and the defendant will be set free.

    That's how extradition treaties work. That's how international law works. As others have mentionned, Venezuela and Canada don't have an extradition treaty.

    Next time, I would advise you to take a few minutes to educate yourself about international law before plastering your ignorance all over the Internet, for everyone to see and wonder at.

  49. Re:Canada will refuse extradition, because of Trum by penandpaper · · Score: 1

    "but omg, Trump, it's so unfair".

    Sadly, this has been argued in court to injoin vactions of the Federal government.

    "Well, it's legal for a president to do that but it's illegal for this president to do it.

    I wish I were kidding.

  50. Hey, this is great... by whitroth · · Score: 1

    The US wants to bust an exec from a company for violating US law.

    I love that. So, next time there's another incident like where Wells Fargo had people creating millions of fake accounts, and charging fees to the people who had no idea what it was, we can JAIL THE CEOs, right? Or another oil spill, we get to JAIL THE CEOs?

    This will go over well, once "real" people (i.e., CEOs) think about the impact....

  51. Re:It's amazing how ridiculous this is. by Aighearach · · Score: 1

    How can the US have been "late" for WWII? Are you suggesting somebody was already defeating the Germans, and my grandparents just showed up to stand around?

    Without the Americans, Europeans would have been speaking either German or Russian, not their native tongues.

  52. Re:It's amazing how ridiculous this is. by Aighearach · · Score: 1

    They didn't just surrender, they made a tactical decision to go underground and wait for foreign allies to show up before fighting, in order to save Paris from being destroyed. And it worked.

    It was a good call, the Americans were better prepared, constitutionally, to fight and win. For the same reasons that during WWI France and Germany built a bunch of opposing trenches and killed each other by the millions, but the Americans showed up and fought with a different attitude and finished the war quickly. Paris would have been utterly destroyed, with lots of dead soldiers, and nothing to show for it.

  53. Re:It's amazing how ridiculous this is. by Aighearach · · Score: 1

    Russia's flag is red, white, and blue. Or if you want an easy way to remember it in the field, "mostly cloudy over a sea of blood." (white-blue-red)

    Don't listen to so much propaganda; Freedom bleeds red. Scots Wah Hae, you could always ask them if you get confused about Uncle Sam.

  54. Re:It's amazing how ridiculous this is. by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

    The Soviet flag is red with a yellow hammer and sickle. Russia was part of the political entity The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics when the vast majority of the bleeding happened. A majority of bleeders (both by absolute number and, by a lesser margin, per capita) were ethnic Russian.

  55. Re:It's amazing how ridiculous this is. by Aighearach · · Score: 1

    Don't forget to say something next time you comment.