Slashdot Mirror


Crime Prediction Software 'Adopted By 14 UK Police Forces' (bbc.com)

At least 14 UK police forces have made use of crime-prediction software or plan to do so, according to Liberty. From a report: The human rights group said [PDF] it had sent a total of 90 Freedom of Information requests out last year to discover which forces used the technology. It believes the programs involved can lead to biased policing strategies that unfairly focus on ethnic minorities and lower-income communities. And it said there had been a "severe lack of transparency" about the matter. Defenders of the technology say it can provide new insights into gun and knife crime, sex trafficking and other potentially life-threatening offences at a time when police budgets are under pressure.

131 comments

  1. minority by bugs2squash · · Score: 4, Funny

    A pool of water with three people in it has been created. Police are looking into it

    --
    Nullius in verba
    1. Re:minority by cayenne8 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      It believes the programs involved can lead to biased policing strategies that unfairly focus on ethnic minorities and lower-income communities.

      Well, if this is where the majority of violent crime happens, they what is wrong with it?

      Are 'facts' now biased if they happened to show it happens more in poor neighborhoods and minority areas?

      Are they wanting to ignore this, and have the cops and SWAT patrolling heavily the low crime areas that might be predominately higher income and less brown, just to be politically correct?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    2. Re:minority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because we have to pretend that propensity to criminality is equal across all demographics.

    3. Re:minority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are 'facts' now biased if they happened to show it happens more in poor neighborhoods and minority areas?

      Poverty breeds crime; it's been known for decades.

    4. Re:minority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oi! You got a licence for that joke?

    5. Re:minority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because we have to pretend that propensity to criminality is equal across all demographics.

      Well, to be fair, if you look at the total amounts stolen, the police should just start rolling out the 'no-knock' warrants, and shooting everyone in the house ... where one or more of the occupants is listed as 'Hedge Fund Manager', 'Investment Banker' or similar.

    6. Re:minority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is A Final Solution. We All Know Where This Is Headed.

      FUCK YO!!!

    7. Re:minority by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

      or maybe there are more victims in high crime areas, and thus they merit greater protection and service from their police.

      --
      Nullius in verba
    8. Re:minority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Asshole.

    9. Re:minority by Golbez81 · · Score: 0

      report

    10. Re:minority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only plus side of SJWism is that it will save us from rule by AI after every algorithm they invent mysteriously winds up being "racist".

    11. Re:minority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are 'facts' now biased if they happened to show it happens more in poor neighborhoods and minority areas?

      Poverty breeds crime; it's been known for decades.

      Therefore, the poor is policed more. The rich don't bother filling their homes with stacks of stolen xboxes.

      But what excuse do minorities have?

    12. Re:minority by randomizer · · Score: 1

      The law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal bread. Anatole France (16 April 1844 – 12 October 1924), born Jacques Anatole François Thibault, was a French poet, journalist, and novelist.

  2. Wow ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, police forces in the UK are using Chinese technology to further spy on their citizens.

    Apparently having a Queen makes you stupid enough to stand for this shit.

    Sorry, the old hag is on my money, but she and her clan can die in a fire or fuck the hell off.

    They'll never have any actual freedom as long as people believe the bullshit that the royals are somehow special.

    1. Re:Wow ... by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So, police forces in the UK are using Chinese technology to further spy on their citizens.

      Apparently having a Queen makes you stupid enough to stand for this shit.

      Sorry, the old hag is on my money, but she and her clan can die in a fire or fuck the hell off.

      They'll never have any actual freedom as long as people believe the bullshit that the royals are somehow special.

      Well, first off, UK spying on their citizens isn't anything new. Britain's high streets have been under the eye of cameras for decades now. You almost have to assume if you're outside on a street in Britain that at least one camera is recording you.

      As for "real freedom" that's fairly subjective based on what you consider freedom to be. There probably isn't any country in the world that everyone would say is a perfect bastion of freedom- because it's a precarious balance. Some would consider the US to be less free with it's lack of representative vote (electoral system), a political system that is biased towards a two party system, lack of an unbiased media (everything leans one way or the other to a degree), world's highest incarceration rate, lack of egalitarian education or health systems. (wealthy areas have much better schools, and rich people get better care). Lots of "morality laws" based on drugs, alcohol, sexual morality.

      As for the Queen, yeah, I'm against her too, or at least her receiving tax payer money. Many will bring up the strawmen of tourists and the Crown Estate as reasons to keep the Queen; as if, making her a private citizen and not receiving public money would stop the tourists coming. And as for the Crown Estate, it is owned by the people of the UK. Government took over responsibility of the Crown Estate in exchange for taking over some of the debts that the royal family had run up. The Crown Estate does not belong to the person wearing the Crown. (The Queen does have substantial wealth and holdings of her own though that are separate to the Crown Estate).

      All that said, the Queen has no impact on "Freedom" in the UK. She has very little power to impact the world for reasons of Good or Evil.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    2. Re:Wow ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here in the US, we have celebrities. Same thing as British royals, but are mainly in the news because they look good to a bit of the populace, and because they are assholes, people respect them even more.

      At least royals have tradition, while here across the pond, we have Jersey Shore.

    3. Re:Wow ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, the old hag is on my money, but she and her clan can die in a fire or fuck the hell off.

      They'll never have any actual freedom as long as people believe the bullshit that the royals are somehow special.

      There was a time such a comment would get you hanged by the neck until dead. Pity it is not still that way.

    4. Re:Wow ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, police forces in the UK are using Chinese technology to further spy on their citizens.

      Apparently having a Queen makes you stupid enough to stand for this shit.

      Sorry, the old hag is on my money, but she and her clan can die in a fire or fuck the hell off.

      They'll never have any actual freedom as long as people believe the bullshit that the royals are somehow special.

      Now if you buy a hammer, pipe wrench, or nail gun at the local home improvement or building supply shoppe you get a visit from The Flying Squad

      And people think the USA is screwed up ?

      I think the UK is much Much MUCH more screwed up than the Yanks !

    5. Re:Wow ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The government takes the profits of the Crown Estate, it doesn't own it. End that deal and the monarch gets the profits back - it's a net loss to the UK taxpayer.

    6. Re:Wow ... by mjwx · · Score: 1

      As for "real freedom" that's fairly subjective based on what you consider freedom to be. There probably isn't any country in the world that everyone would say is a perfect bastion of freedom- because it's a precarious balance. Some would consider the US to be less free with it's lack of representative vote (electoral system), a political system that is biased towards a two party system, lack of an unbiased media (everything leans one way or the other to a degree), world's highest incarceration rate, lack of egalitarian education or health systems. (wealthy areas have much better schools, and rich people get better care). Lots of "morality laws" based on drugs, alcohol, sexual morality.

      This

      The UK is actually one of the better nations for personal liberty, even amongst developed nations. We treat drug offences are minor crimes (most drug offences are routinely ignored). The powers of the police to actually make arrests is very limited (and when violated, you are "de-arrested", not released without charge or have a charge trumped up against you), you'll never be pulled over for doing 10 over on the motorway, let alone have your cash confiscated on the spot as "drug money". Our prison population is far too large though, for the number of prisons we actually have.

      Nor do we regulate the morality of sex. In fact it's a running joke that whatever sexual proclivity you have, it'll cost you £300 in London. Yes, prostitution is legal here in England and Wales (pimping is not though).

      We've got a few foibles like cutting into a queue being a near capital offence. But all nations have their foibles.

      Personal liberty is one of the four British core values.

      What I'd like to know is what this prediction software is actually doing. Sure it sounds scary and the Beeb sucks at technology reporting, but what if it is just trying to automate what CID (detectives) already do and draw patterns? It could be as simple as "Guv, there's been a lot of car fefts in 'Ackney, might want to put a few extra uniforms down there", maybe even going as far as to identify the types of cars being stolen, approximate times, any connection between the owners (same dealer/mechanic). There's no point in complaining that this is Minority Report, without actually knowing what's happening. Lets not base our entire knowledge of things based on movies, we're not the US president.

      OTOH, we are the nation that actually deployed Skynet.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    7. Re:Wow ... by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      The government takes the profits of the Crown Estate, it doesn't own it. End that deal and the monarch gets the profits back - it's a net loss to the UK taxpayer.

      That's a common misconception. Since 1760 the monarch hasn't owned it.

      The Crown Estate belongs to the British people "in the name of the monarch" (basically to save face it kept the name). George III ran up a lot of debts and parliament bailed him out in exchange for the Crown Estate. The Crown Estate belongs to the people of Britain now. Her Majesty occupies certain parts of the Crown Estate on the whims of the people. She does outright own a lot of estates herself though.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    8. Re:Wow ... by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      Nor do we regulate the morality of sex.

      That's not entirely true. Certain niche's are off-limits. For example "face sitting", the act of a "dominant" woman sitting on the face of a man to receive pleasuring is not legal to be filmed or watched in the UK

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  3. Like the stock market by WoodstockJeff · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Past performance is not a guarantee of future returns".

    But, in the case of past criminal activity, areas that have a history of high crime are still likely to have high crime in the future.

    But saying that, and acting on it, has now become racism, because a lot of high crime area also happen to be areas where minorities live. Increasing patrolling of those areas to help reduce crime have a high chance of finding minority offenders committing crime.

    Should the police REDUCE their patrols in those high-crime areas, they'll be accused of racism for not protecting those minorities.

    People who live in those areas should be asking themselves what the motives are of the groups trying to stop the police from doing their jobs.

    1. Re:Like the stock market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      That's a problem lefty nutjobs have created.
      Not the left, no, those people are regular and fine, I mean the full-on fucktards that want total deregulation and full social-justice societies. Those kinds of pricks.
      They whine their asses off and rile up the average plebs enough to make them think "hey, wait, yeah, that IS racism!" because they are too dumb to question the reasons.
      You can never please these people. Ever.

      It's worse that the poor police officers are getting fucked over for it. Fucked over for doing their job properly.
      Put years of effort in to protect and serve, then you get shit on by some purple-headed fat hypercubesexual moron.

    2. Re:Like the stock market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But, in the case of past criminal activity, areas that have a history of high crime are still likely to have high crime in the future.

      Yes. I agree. If a crime happens in one are you can be assured of it happening again. Drug users are creatures of habit (no pun intended) and usually return to the same areas to buy drugs regardless of the locations of their dealers. Drugs are sold mostly by "gangs" who fight to control their areas. Being a member of a gang is a crime and punishable under the law so certain areas of the city where drugs are bought and sold tend to be so-called "hight crime areas".

      The problem here is that the people who BUY THE DRUGS are overwhelmingly FROM OTHER NEIGHBORHOODS, neighborhoods WITH MONEY. No one suggest cops raid houses of citizens with nice cars and big houses. Just keep busting the doors down in the slums and getting the same results as always.

      People who live in those areas should be asking themselves what the motives are of the groups trying to stop the police from doing their jobs.

      Yes sir, I agree whole heartedly.

    3. Re:Like the stock market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "the full-on fucktards that want total deregulation" = Libertarians, idiot. That's the Tea Party, the only difference is they only want any justice for rich white cowards exclusively.

    4. Re:Like the stock market by alvinrod · · Score: 2

      No one suggest cops raid houses of citizens with nice cars and big houses. Just keep busting the doors down in the slums and getting the same results as always.

      Removing everything else from the equation, if your goal is to stop the illegal sale of drugs, it makes far more sense to target the point of sale than it does to go after all of the buyers individually. It's also a matter of how much punishment can be handed out since a person with a first possession charge who only has a small amount of some substance will see less punishment than a person with a large amount of that substance and likely previous criminal history. It's also easier to catch buyers in the act while busting the supplier since they're more concentrated.

      There's a lot of extra baggage saddled on top of that, but if you just remove all of that and look at it like a simple problem detached from actual people and their individual characteristics, the decisions seem rather obvious. It is as you point out a bit of insanity, because it doesn't matter how many drug dealers you arrest, since people want to buy more. Viewed purely from a perspective of economic principles that action is foolish since reducing the supply only drives up prices which signal others that they should engage in that activity as it is now even more profitable for them to do so.

      I think we'll eventually come around to decriminalizing and legalizing all drugs. However, that isn't going to fix bad neighborhoods. They'll still be poor and likely turning to some other form of crime to get by. Not necessarily because they're bad people, but because a lot of other foolish decisions that we've made had made it incredibly difficult for those people to legally do anything productive that is as profitable as crime is for them.

    5. Re:Like the stock market by atrex · · Score: 1

      They could easily get around the racial/ethnic complaint by hiring the people of those communities that want to make a difference in them to police them. Could advocacy groups really run around claiming that the arrests are racially motivated if the arresting officer and presiding judges are the same ethnicity as the person being arrested? Side point: giving people jobs with a living wage is one of the fastest ways to reduce crime.

    6. Re:Like the stock market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >The problem here is that the people who BUY THE DRUGS are overwhelmingly FROM OTHER NEIGHBORHOODS, neighborhoods WITH MONEY.

      Not true at all.

    7. Re:Like the stock market by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      What planet are you living on? Many of the arresting officers are the same race as the people being arrested. It makes no difference to people who complain about these things. They just claim it is systemic.

    8. Re:Like the stock market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It's worse that the poor police officers are getting fucked over for it. Fucked over for doing their job properly." = You're a moron who has never known a single cop in your entire life, that's a fake anecdote invented by a faggot. You.

    9. Re:Like the stock market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      >Increasing patrolling of those areas to help reduce crime have a high chance of finding minority offenders committing crime.

      >Should the police REDUCE their patrols in those high-crime areas, they'll be accused of racism for not protecting those minorities.

      For a real life example of this, see Baltimore after the 2015 riots over the killing of Freddie Gray.

    10. Re:Like the stock market by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 2

      Side point: giving people jobs with a living wage is one of the fastest ways to reduce crime.

      Some folks are just plain greedy. A lot of Wall Street types earn way more than a living wage, yet they still manage to get themselves entangled in criminal financial shenanigans.

      It would be very amusing if this crime prediction AI directed police patrol cars to London's financial district.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    11. Re:Like the stock market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course it's systemic. Crime is a function of poverty x lack of education x lack of fraternal resources. Slums stay slums without investment. Schools stay failing and truants stay in trouble. Records don't go away, problems multiply.

      Of course it's not purely racial like being born in one race makes you subject to any of that - it's where you're born and brought up that shapes you. Nobody invests in the slums. There's no education in the slums. No way out.

      White criminals in the Red states that used to have coal mines have the same issues now. The jobs dried up and they don't have educations or any way out. Of course they turn to meth and stealing copper. It's all there is.

    12. Re:Like the stock market by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Exactly. So stop with the race talk.

    13. Re:Like the stock market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) This isn't about fixing bad neighborhoods, but nice try. This is about increasing the number of "criminals" prosecuted. Cops don't fix neighborhoods, low income loans and local job opportunities fix bad neighborhoods, but that's not really sexy come voting day, especially if your voting block are "tough on crime".
      2) Although it has become popular in some circles to say so, BEING POOR DOES NOT MAKE YOU A CRIMINAL. Apparently this database will, but that's besides the point. Nor does being poor make you foolish. The reverse is sometimes, but not usually, true. Not having enough money to make ends meet and not being able to get out of your situation makes you poor, just so we are clear.
      3) If you are so god damned afraid of the poor turning to crime because it pays more than the jobs they are offered, I think you might be better off RAISING THE MINIMUM WAGE. Just a thought.
      4) It is easier to prosecute criminals who can't afford good lawyers, which is what this is about.

    14. Re:Like the stock market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You act like there are no feedback loops in the response to crime that disproportionately target people of a certain race however. Criminals come in all races, the responses to crime are anything but equally applied, statistically.

      There are many reasons, racial prejudice holdovers among red state blue-collars who become law enforcement, old boy networks, and now we have unambiguously racist leadership in the White House and majority of the GOP.

      To pretend like that isn't a problem that will be dealt with one way or another is head-in-ass hiding from the issue. It is however not the only issue to deal with. Racism in law enforcement / justice is an injustice that undermines the system.

      You don't deal with it, it becomes a larger problem. America didn't deal with it for hundreds of years and even now is really only taking baby steps and lip service towards understanding how these things came about, dealing with them.

      Or you wouldn't have police making racist videos taunting people who have to walk home in the snow after their car is impounded due to late registration, or sergeants telling their squads to "just shoot" homeless minorities, even in joke.

      Pretending none of this is real or has to be dealt with one way or another is why you will see it keep being a problem, and an excuse used by both sides to prevent actual progress moving forward. Deal with it, solve it, or stew in it.

    15. Re:Like the stock market by pgmrdlm · · Score: 2

      Um, you DO KNOW that there are numerous examples of African American police officers using excessive force on African American citizens. Don't you?

      https://psmag.com/social-justi...

      --
      Anonymous comments are as pathetic as the anonymous "sources" that contaminate gutless journalism from the New York Time
    16. Re:Like the stock market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That doesn't excuse nor does it even statistically compare to the history of white officers abusing their power in racist ways, including all the way up to the legislature and supreme court. To point to a few counter examples as if a counterpoint, that just demonstrates what a feckless nazi faggot of no value your white supremacist inbred culture has made you, so dishonest and cowardly that if you were faced with reality it would literally break your faggot nazi neck.

    17. Re:Like the stock market by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      White criminals in the Red states that used to have coal mines have the same issues now. The jobs dried up and they don't have educations or any way out. Of course they turn to meth and stealing copper. It's all there is.

      But...but...I thought, you know....white privilege???

      How could such a thing happen?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    18. Re:Like the stock market by sdinfoserv · · Score: 1

      YES! Exactly true. We in the US can no longer speak because "facts" are now racist and heaven forbid someone be "racist".. The "facts" are crime is higher in lower income areas. Lower income areas are also tend to have a higher percentages of minorities. So, statistically, YES, by sending police to areas of higher crimes at times when crimes statistically happen, you are sending police to patrol areas of with a higher percentage of non-white populations.... meaning.... profiling works.

    19. Re:Like the stock market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually no, Libertarians want a lot of deregulation.

      The ones who want TOTAL deregulation are anarchists.

      Get it right next time, your 2 digit IQ is showing.

    20. Re:Like the stock market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > 1) This isn't about fixing bad neighborhoods, but nice try. This is about increasing the number of "criminals" prosecuted. Cops don't fix neighborhoods, low income loans and local job opportunities fix bad neighborhoods, but that's not really sexy come voting day, especially if your voting block are "tough on crime".

      Low taxes and low regulations also helps these things.

      > 2) Although it has become popular in some circles to say so, BEING POOR DOES NOT MAKE YOU A CRIMINAL. Apparently this database will, but that's besides the point. Nor does being poor make you foolish. The reverse is sometimes, but not usually, true. Not having enough money to make ends meet and not being able to get out of your situation makes you poor, just so we are clear.

      Note that being rich doesn't make you a criminal also. Having said that, this database will probably help fight white collar crime even better than regular because white collar crime involves a lot of numbers, which AI lieks even moar than Mudkips.

      > 3) If you are so god damned afraid of the poor turning to crime because it pays more than the jobs they are offered, I think you might be better off RAISING THE MINIMUM WAGE. Just a thought.

      Even better: encourage poor people to have less children: If less poor people have children, there will be more resources to educate the remainder and there will be less people to do poor people jobs, naturally increasing the pay for such jobs, and there will be less poverty overall.

      > 4) It is easier to prosecute criminals who can't afford good lawyers, which is what this is about.

      And people who can't afford good lawyers are typically not doing high paying jobs, meaning they're more likely to be committing crimes because poor people tend to commit more crime.

    21. Re:Like the stock market by BringsApples · · Score: 2

      They're not training this software with tales-of-the-rich-and-famous. They're training it with the likes of everyday people that make up a majority of petty criminals.

      The big-time criminals are all safe from such in their elected positions.

      --
      Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
    22. Re:Like the stock market by sjames · · Score: 1

      It's also a matter of how much punishment can be handed out since a person with a first possession charge who only has a small amount of some substance will see less punishment than a person with a large amount of that substance and likely previous criminal history.

      You seem to have confused handing out more punishment with the objective of reducing drug sales. If you just wanna punish someone, that strategy makes sense.

      Those first time offenders are far more likely to be scared strait by a bit of police action than the dealer who's done the song and dance before.

      At least part of it is likely that if you start punishing a large bulk of the not poor not minority buyers, the law starts to look uncomfortably un-democratic.

    23. Re:Like the stock market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can never please these people. Ever.

      Very true, but it's not limited to the ultra left. The exact same statement applies to the ultra right. If you removed every person of color from the continent, the ultra right would not be happy. Oh, they might be for a few months.. But eventually they'd have to find someone else to be unhappy with.. We've seen it in history.. The Irish were treated like crap by the racists.. I don't know if it's even possible to be more white than an Irishman... They were the wrong kind of white I guess..

      It all boils down to a simple statement: Haters gotta hate

    24. Re:Like the stock market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an idiot. You're a racist who condemns racism while speaking racism.

    25. Re:Like the stock market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Statistically if you are poor it is more likely that you lack self discipline which is required to study. Lacking in self discipline also means that you are more likely to engage in criminal activity hence higher crime rates.

      The real question is whether self discipline can be trained. I believe it can. But the school system such as it is doesn't work to provide self discipline to everyone.

    26. Re:Like the stock market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3) If you are so god damned afraid of the poor turning to crime because it pays more than the jobs they are offered, I think you might be better off RAISING THE MINIMUM WAGE. Just a thought.

      If you retarded cunts could come up with a way of fixing this that doesn't shift the burden to someone else we could talk. Fuck you and your minimum wage.

      Why not raise the minimum wage to $50/hour? Fuck it, we can all be upper middle class!

      Why is $15/hour more reasonable than $50/hour? Is it because you lefties still want to have poor people? Why not $20/hour? Or $40/hour?

      Hint: It's because everyone knows that the minimum wage doesn't do much to lift anyone out of poverty. It's just more control by the government and more shifting of the burden. But, for some reason, $15/hour is more palatable to the general public than $20 or $30/hour.

      Fuck you, ya commie.

      If you assholes actually cared we'd be talking about better education.. More vocational training and the like.. There's something like 50,000 heavy equipment operator jobs, that are open, in the US. Why not train people to do those jobs? No, you'd rather mandate that some drain-on-society who's still working at McDonalds, at the age of 40, should be gifted money for doing a job that was intended for teenagers..

      I'm pretty goddamn conservative, and I can assure you that like minded individuals would be totally fine with job training.. I'd even be fine with a "pay to learn" scenario.. Give people $15/hour to go to vocational training.. ONE TIME... We'll pay you to become a more useful member of society.. We'll get the money back in income taxes as a result of your higher income...

      I'll support damn near anything that "teaches a man to fish" versus just handing the asshole fish constantly (or making some other bastard hand him fish).

    27. Re:Like the stock market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Side point: giving people jobs with a living wage is one of the fastest ways to reduce crime.

      Spoken like a true socialist.. Not "train people to do a job that pays better"... Nope.. Not that... "Give them a more money for doing a minor task and make some other asshole pay for it (the employer)".

      How about I give you the middle finger?

    28. Re:Like the stock market by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 0

      Listen asshole, if you're going to spout white nationalist/supremacist/racist/bigoted/small-minded bullshit like that, at least be enough of a man to put your name to it, so we know who it is that's the white nationalist/supremacist/racist/bigoted/small-minded prick. Otherwise you just come off as a coward. If you really believe all that fucking bullshit you just vomited all over the screen then you should at least stick up for it and take whatever you get for saying it.

    29. Re:Like the stock market by pgmrdlm · · Score: 1

      Another police hater hides for his comment.

      --
      Anonymous comments are as pathetic as the anonymous "sources" that contaminate gutless journalism from the New York Time
    30. Re:Like the stock market by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

      Can vouch from experience. From the ghetto, Still live in the ghetto. Used to sell drugs to make enough money to live until I could get further in my career. Doing better, no longer a criminal... Still in the ghetto....

    31. Re:Like the stock market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GP says nothing at all related to "white nationalist/supremacist/racist/bigoted/small-minded bullshit" and yet that's all you rail about, as if you had no idea what you were actually responding to.

      Seriously, get a new weapon in your arsenal. Your current one is dull and rusty, much like your intellect.

    32. Re:Like the stock market by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

      He's never had a run in with the cops. He doesn't realize that they treat us white people as bad as the black and hispanic criminals.

    33. Re:Like the stock market by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      How about this. Should funding for the police ever be cut before funding for the defence forces. You are safe from a potential war but too late you were murdered in your bed.

      Logically should not defence funding be cut to zero before you touch once cent of police funding. What is better value an attack carrier costing billions or a properly functioning police force.

      Surely people can see the stupidity on show, why are they funding nuclear attack submarines when they can not afford a properly functioning police force and now look to be relying on a magic box to 'BLAME' for policing failures, the computer made us do it.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    34. Re:Like the stock market by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      If you send extra officers to an area you will detect more crime, obviously. If you then say that proves that there is more crime in that area you are an idiot. It just means you got better at detecting it there, and helped create some more by criminalizing people who would otherwise have smoked a bit of pot or sprayed some graffiti and then got on with the rest of their lives.

      This is all obvious, right?

      The computer doesn't understand this, it just gets into a feedback loop where the more officers it sends to an area the more crime it finds.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    35. Re:Like the stock market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd even be fine with a "pay to learn" scenario.. Give people $15/hour to go to vocational training.. ONE TIME... We'll pay you to become a more useful member of society.. We'll get the money back in income taxes as a result of your higher income...

      They do already have something akin to that, some states will cover the costs of vocational training, but usually it extends only as far as the price of certification tests and tuition for classes. You'd have quite a hard time getting people on board with paying people by the hour/stipend to go into trade school, on either side.

    36. Re:Like the stock market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It works like this:

      Police use machine learning to predict where to police
      Software ends up targeting black communities - well duh just look at the stats
      Soshal Justish types get upset and demand it be modified
      Police modify software to ensure that it sticks to quotas
      Police realise the software is now useless for its original purpose
      LOOP: Crime figures soar
      Soshal Justish types claim it's because the police are institutionally racist
      GOTO LOOP

      While society goes down to the fucking tubes. Fuck you left wingers.

    37. Re:Like the stock market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you send extra officers to an area you will detect more crime, obviously.

      Only if there is lots of undetected crime there - sad if this is a natural assumption. You could arrest every criminal, more officers would then just get bored.

    38. Re:Like the stock market by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      You and 'people' like you are either also racist/bigoted/etc, or you're only capable of seeing what's on the surface and not what's implied. Or are you just so new to the Internet that you don't understand how some people operate?

  4. Thought crime! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your next!

    1. Re: Thought crime! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes! Oh such a clever joke have a cookie sweetheart mommy will read you to sleep. You also need mosquito netting

    2. Re:Thought crime! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's "My" next? Really? I thought I sold that POS.

    3. Re:Thought crime! by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

      Your next!

      Grammar crime.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
  5. presumed... by guygo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Guilty until proven innocent. Just what every totalitarian government needs to keep whomever they don't like locked up and silent.

    1. Re:presumed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sir, you need to improve your social score before you will be allowed to purchase that flight to visit your sick mother.

    2. Re:presumed... by Falos · · Score: 1

      So, what, $500 per point? Buy a new cruiser for the police? I can bribe you right here if mastercard is okay.

    3. Re:presumed... by Scroatzilla · · Score: 1

      Exactly. It's so strange that the focus would be on whom this technology might "discriminate against" rather than its actual existence and the fact that it would be used at all... Yuck.

  6. Could be Good... Could be Bad. by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

    It's all in how it is regulated and how it is used. Like any technology, whether this is a net-positive or a net-negative for the world isn't immediately obvious. I could easily see this being used to persecute minorities OR to genuinely help lessen crime.

    Who is going to regulate how the police use this though- and what they can get away with?

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    1. Re:Could be Good... Could be Bad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could be good... WILL be bad.

      fixed that for you.

    2. Re:Could be Good... Could be Bad. by ChromeAeonuim · · Score: 3, Insightful

      We're talking about the country that arrested someone over a Nazi pug joke. We know exactly which way they're going with regards to surveillance and thoughtcrime.

    3. Re:Could be Good... Could be Bad. by atrex · · Score: 1

      The next step: Minority Report.

    4. Re:Could be Good... Could be Bad. by jellomizer · · Score: 3, Informative

      In terms of morals, Net Positive and Net Negative isn't good enough.
      How we handle justice in a society is a strong indication of our real morals as a society.
      It is really easy to justify immoral cruelty, if there is a strong net benefit. But it isn't the right thing to do. Even if nicer way of doing things has less of a net benefit, it is probably the better more moral thing to do.

      The big problem as you had stated the true-net value isn't obvious and may not be calculated for a long time. There is only so much oppression a group can handle, and also if a group isn't allowed to be shared the benefits of society, they will not follow the rules of that society, and make their own sub groups, thus for a program to help identify crime, would find a stronger correlation to that area.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    5. Re:Could be Good... Could be Bad. by Z80a · · Score: 1

      Given it's a country that implements a paid channel by sending people to invade your home and check if you can tune in the channel and charge you instead of you know, encrypting the channel and selling a box, i don't think it will be good.

    6. Re:Could be Good... Could be Bad. by Falos · · Score: 1

      Functional systems tend to be more comfortable with oversight, documentation, transparency, limits and controls, checks'n'balances.

      Exploitative systems fear oversight and public records. Use of voodoo tends to fear transparency.

      Usually a hidden and shady system is that way because money is changing hands. But politics is fine too.

  7. Anything "prediction" should be illegal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To think people's lives could be affected by a pseudo science.

  8. Precrime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here it comes. Precrime is tomorrow's society sculptor, and fear is the sculptor's greatest tool. Here's to all of the peons who will suffer under this wonderful new regime. Just forget to remember, the only right view is The Party's view. Who's The Party? If you're asking that question it isn't you. What's their views? That's not for you to know. Why should you forget? Because remembering is a crime, and they will catch you before you even commit the act. We've always been at war with Oceania.

  9. Re:Too little, too late! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    We already have it here in the US; It's called Twitter, and it can pillory someone in minutes, destroy their reputation forever and burn them in effigy for weeks after they are found guilty of standing still and smiling in an unsanctioned manner.

    We don't need AI to protect the public, we have Natural Stupidity.

  10. POLICE SUPPOSED TO STAY AWAY FROM MINORITIES??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "It believes the programs involved can lead to biased policing strategies that unfairly focus on ethnic minorities"

    IMHO:

    What makes them to believe that exactly?
    Where/what is their proof/evidence for such thing can really happen?

    Also, we all need to keep in mind that, higher crime can really happen in poor neighborhoods, where also ethnic minorities maybe majority!!!

    Police need to focus on wherever crime is historically happened more, regardless of ethnic minority situation @ those places!!!
    Or, is the police supposed to stay away from wherever ethnic minorities live???

    Also, if any software really keep causing false alarms (causing police forces/teams sent to deal w/ innocent people), wouldn't that be noticed very soon?
    Do we really think police departments anywhere, really would be okay w/ keep wasting time/effort?
    (& Nobody higher up would notice that either?)

    1. Re:POLICE SUPPOSED TO STAY AWAY FROM MINORITIES??? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      What makes them to believe that exactly? Racial bias from AI has been shone in the past, because it is based off of data from racial biases.
      Where/what is their proof/evidence for such thing can really happen? Racial biases have been shown in resume filtering programs. The "deep learning" systems, found that factors such as a name or address was corralled with low employment chances, so it rejected the resumes.

      There is crime in wealthy neighborhoods as well. Often more serious crimes. But it often goes under Kids will be Kids, while a minority will be treated more harshly and the police would not just scare off some kids, but track them down and arrest them. Poor neighborhoods are also more closely packed together. Putting more people together causes more conflict, and also it is easier to "police" as you don't need to travel far to find someone breaking some law.

      Police need to find ways to stop and deescalate the problems before a crime happens. Yes they should be able to police anywhere, however they need to be aware of their own bias, and make sure they are thinking and working carefully to make sure their gut feelings are not the wrong one.

      "BLA BLA BLA Police have a tough job, adding something to make them think will only delay a life and death moment..." Someone shouldn't go into policing, as a quick power rush, and their training should be more complete for them to make better quick decisions, and insure their biases are well controlled.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    2. Re:POLICE SUPPOSED TO STAY AWAY FROM MINORITIES??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "What makes them to believe that exactly?" - Why don't you break down and bother to read the first thing about this, you moronic head-in-ass entitled republican faggot of no value to the discussion?

    3. Re:POLICE SUPPOSED TO STAY AWAY FROM MINORITIES??? by pgmrdlm · · Score: 1

      We get it, you hate the police.

      what happened, you get busted at one time? A relative, a friend?

      Do tell, why do you hate the police so much?

      --
      Anonymous comments are as pathetic as the anonymous "sources" that contaminate gutless journalism from the New York Time
    4. Re:POLICE SUPPOSED TO STAY AWAY FROM MINORITIES??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We get it, you're a known racist faggot troll without any testicles waiting for Trump to hang for treason.

      What happened, your mom is a toothless red state meth whore, can't get work in coal miner bars?

      Do tell, why are you so inbred and your testicles so shriveled and worthless that you suck Putin's dick?

    5. Re:POLICE SUPPOSED TO STAY AWAY FROM MINORITIES??? by Junta · · Score: 2

      I think it depends on exactly *how* these 'predictions' are used. If it is used to plan patrols, then in *theory* having patrols in the area should be nothing to fear. If it is used as 'evidence', that would be dumb. If it is used to influence sentencing, that too is dumb and has already been shown to be a problem.

      In the planning patrols use case, it only seems wrong because the relationship between the police and citizenry is dysfunctional. In an ideal system, law-abiding citizens *shouldn't* feel persecuted just because there are police patrols nearby. In fact, it should be reassuring. However that is largely not the relationship that has been cultivated between the police and other folks.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    6. Re:POLICE SUPPOSED TO STAY AWAY FROM MINORITIES??? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      There is crime in wealthy neighborhoods as well. Often more serious crimes. But it often goes under Kids will be Kids, while a minority will be treated more harshly

      I'm a bit hesitant to compare egging someones house vs drive by shootings with real (stolen) guns.....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    7. Re:POLICE SUPPOSED TO STAY AWAY FROM MINORITIES??? by guruevi · · Score: 1

      Or perhaps your perpetual finding of bias is completely manufactured. All the data shows that police actually have an inverse bias towards poor and minorities, you're more likely to get shot or arrested during an encounter if you're white than if you're black.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    8. Re:POLICE SUPPOSED TO STAY AWAY FROM MINORITIES??? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I think it depends on exactly *how* these 'predictions' are used. If it is used to plan patrols, then in *theory* having patrols in the area should be nothing to fear. If it is used as 'evidence', that would be dumb.

      Legend tells of a place where such knowledge can be found. Few venture there, and fewer still return.

      Some call it TFA.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    9. Re:POLICE SUPPOSED TO STAY AWAY FROM MINORITIES??? by pgmrdlm · · Score: 1

      No asshole. I looked it up and posted a link. Minority police are just as abusive to minorities as whites. But hey, you fucking hate police. and mother fucker. I hate abuse by what ever color the police officer. The only mother fucking racist is you. fuck off. die in a drive by shooting. die slow. die in front of your family. die in serious pain

      --
      Anonymous comments are as pathetic as the anonymous "sources" that contaminate gutless journalism from the New York Time
  11. Re:They already do that... by wolfheart111 · · Score: 1

    They don't need this.... sadly enough.

    --
    [($)]
  12. Reminds me of that movie... by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

    This really reminds me of that movie, the one about crime in the future. I remember it was called "Judge Dredd" and had Stallone in it.

    1. Re:Reminds me of that movie... by grumpy-cowboy · · Score: 1

      And Minority Report : I always dreamed about having a Pre-crime squad! No more crimes! :D

      --
      Will $CURRENT_YEAR be the year of the Linux Desktop?
    2. Re:Reminds me of that movie... by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      That was 1980's Ireland.
      But vans and cars got used.
      Satellite tracking worked wonders on every smaller cell that thought it could never be tracked in real time :)
      To collaborate was the only option.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  13. Re:Too little, too late! by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 0

    There are AI apps coming down the road that will float balloons over your head in augmented reality pooh poohing you for this or that...forever.

    Oh no, you posted support for candidate x or issue x, nevermind anonymously.

    The conversion of modern politics to religion in the 16th century is almost complete.

    Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition! And by the time it appears, it will be too late.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  14. Human rights are destroying the UK by Ashthon · · Score: 2

    It believes the programs involved can lead to biased policing strategies that unfairly focus on ethnic minorities and lower-income communities.

    Policing should be focused on high-crime sections of the community, since that's where it's needed most. It would be absurd to send the police to wealthy low-crime suburbs and have them walking around doing nothing. If the police were to ignore the crime taking place in low-income communities, the ones who suffer most of the people who live in those communities. I know that because I live in one. Where my parents live there are 25 reported crimes within a 1 mile radius in a month, while where I live there are 650 reported crimes within a one mile radius. I want the police here, tackling crime, not scared of coming here because it wouldn't be politically correct to investigate crime in a low-income area because some arseholes in an ivory tower are worried about "human rights."

    People like this libertyhumanrights.org.uk are a major part of the problem, and are the reason crime is spiralling out of control. We've got police scared to investigate Muslim rape gangs because they fear being called racists, so young girls are left to be abused. We've got police scared to stop and search black people out of fear of being called racists, so children in back communities are being stabbed on their way to and from school. We've got police scared of tackling crime in low-income areas because that's apparently against the human rights of criminals, so crime is left to go out of control. Meanwhile, what police are investigating is "non-crime hate incidents" where somebody posted a nasty comment on Twitter, because the out-of-touch leaders of the country think that's the priority.

    Political correctness is absolutely destroying UK society and things are becoming visibly worse on the streets. The police have become largely irrelevant in many communities, and I don't even waste my time reporting crime to them since I know from past attempts to report serious crime that they will do absolutely nothing. The other day I saw some boys with an air rifle leaned against the wall of a school, shooting it into the school. I ignored it any carried on with my day because I'm well aware that the police are more interested in political correctness and "non-crime hate incidents" than tackling crime. The crime figures here are a fraction of the actual crime rate, but most crime simply goes unreported because the police have become so ineffective it's simply not worth bothering. Sure, if there was a "non-crime hate incident" that's worth reporting as they'll have a van full of officers there in minutes, but if an actual crime is taking place then you're wasting your time.

    Policing in the UK urgently needs reforming, but sadly people of influence, like this ibertyhumanrights.org.uk, are more interested in rearranging the deck chairs while the ship sinks.

    1. Re:Human rights are destroying the UK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By not reporting a crime, you are part of the problem.

    2. Re:Human rights are destroying the UK by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Policing isn't the solution to crime. That's your mistake, that's why you are part of the problem.

      Liberty understand that, which is why they want to fix the actual problem rather than treating the symptoms.

      Stop being politically correct and demanding harsh treatment. Properly fund youth services and community policing that doesn't criminalize kids, setting them up for a life of crime and poverty.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:Human rights are destroying the UK by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Political correctness is absolutely destroying UK society and things are becoming visibly worse on the streets. The police have become largely irrelevant in many communities, and I don't even waste my time reporting crime to them since I know from past attempts to report serious crime that they will do absolutely nothing. The other day I saw some boys with an air rifle leaned against the wall of a school, shooting it into the school. I ignored it any carried on with my day because I'm well aware that the police are more interested in political correctness and "non-crime hate incidents" than tackling crime. The crime figures here are a fraction of the actual crime rate, but most crime simply goes unreported because the police have become so ineffective it's simply not worth bothering. Sure, if there was a "non-crime hate incident" that's worth reporting as they'll have a van full of officers there in minutes, but if an actual crime is taking place then you're wasting your time.

      This is the most batshit insane stuff I've read today. It's so completely obviously based upon bullshit logic ("The police are concerned about hate crimes therefore they won't be concerned about {real crime}, and I'm not going to report it without apparently realizing I'm actually why nothing will be done about it.")

      I love the idea of the police being "politically correct", yeah, that's what the kinds of people who sign up for the police are. They're notorious for being anti-racist vegan sandal wearing hippies, right?

      Do you ever stop for a moment and listen to the bullcrap you spew and ask yourself, "Does this make sense? Should I really be repeating whatever I read in the Daily Mail if I want people to take me seriously? Am I making myself look like a complete moron?"

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    4. Re:Human rights are destroying the UK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People like this libertyhumanrights.org.uk are a major part of the problem

      There is something about the human mind that makes it work for exactly the opposite of what you are trying to do.

      A perfect example is feminism. Feminists think they are "freeing" their bretheren, and yet what they have achieved is that females are no longer able to be criticized so they get NO feedback at all on their behavior... which is why we see so many females acting unbelievably stupid and without restraint. Nobody will respect a female who acts like that... so the feminists have lost... through their own, self defeating efforts. lol

  15. Low-income crime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're rich the software doesn't detect crime.

  16. riddle me this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In my white and asian neighborhood we predominantly have white collar crime. But most of the fatal shootings are by cops against Hispanic men.

    1. Re:riddle me this by temcat · · Score: 1

      "Fatal shooting" is not a sufficient description. Circumstances of the "shooting" matter.

  17. Oi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you got a loicense for that spoon mate.

  18. The UK already imposes sentence on pure suspicion by spazmonkey · · Score: 1

    The addition of crime prediction software to a system that doesn't currently require evidence of a crime even having occurred to convict is terrifying. The UK system regularly imposes criminal penalties on those simply suspected of being the kind of person to commit a crime - no accusation of a crime needed. This isn't going to help any.

  19. Re: This Isnt Anything Like That Movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just how bad is your Altzhiemer's disease? I can smell your old man ball stench and failure from here!

  20. Re:Too little, too late! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pfft, it's the TRUMP inquisition, and unfortunately for him, the hangman is hanging. No more Muellin' around. Execute the traitor.

  21. US metros did this 50+ years ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More police in neighborhoods with large numbers of lower educated, SINGLE parent households and lots of unsupervised teenagers.

    Those are high crime neighborhoods regardless of ethnicity, national origin, etc.

  22. Easy to write by Locke2005 · · Score: 0

    if (lastName == "Trump") probablityOfCrime = 100;

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    1. Re:Easy to write by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should charge Trump rent for all the space he occupies in your head.

  23. Fascist Pig Shit Prediction Software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mine just went to red alert.

    Heil Hitlary!

  24. Racist faggot Gayenne isnt trying to solve racism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But instead to serve it in a cowardly way from the rhetorical shadows like all faggot nazis, because he's a racist faggot troll. Nothing else. Look at the comment history people, stop feeding the racist faggot.

  25. Gayenne the racist coward here to dither again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're confusing the sellout of the working class by corporatists in southern red states, (which you support) and white privilege, the ignorance white racist morons have about historical systemic injustices, (which you embody)

    The truth is you're no different from the african american slave, you're just lighter skinned and with a head start - but you end up in the same boneyard, because you sell yourself out to corporatists like the mislead whore you are.

  26. Re:Too little, too late! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is so blatantly obvious you have no grip on reality. If Trump was found guilty tomorrow, and scheduled to "hang", Pence would pardon him.. End of story. Pardons cannot be overturned by the courts and they are not subject to Congressional approval or consent..

    Get this through your tiny little snowflake brain: Trump will never do any jail time, he will never "hang". The very best you can hope for is for him to be removed from office. That's all. The constitution is quite clear that the only penalty for conviction under impeachment is removal from office and a prohibition on holding public office in the future.

    Judgement in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States.....

    The rest of the text specifies that the party can still be tried in regular courts, but that's where the pardon comes in.

    No US President has EVER been removed from office. There have been two impeachments and two acquittals.

    So, kindly, SHUT THE FUCK UP YOU IDIOT.

  27. Re:Too little, too late! by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    Why is this downmodded? It has nothing to do with Trump. The Chinese dictatorship is piloting a similar system for the Venezuelan dictatorship.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  28. Rocket Science... not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A police friend was accused of racism because he has a record of arresting 95% plus minorities. Laughable considering his beat is 99% minority populated.

    Apparently he should be more equitable and go find lots more (non-existent in his best) non-minority offenders.

    1. Re:Rocket Science... not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is why when I hear these hysterical accusations of racism/sexism/bigotry now, I just yawn and change the channel, scroll the page, whatever. It's become nothing but noise, diluting the signal. The propaganda puppets are just so tiresome, predictable, and tedious.

      They can't be convinced by logic, reason, or common sense. Life's short, there's no time to waste on their idiocy. So just learn to identify them quickly, and ignore.

  29. I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every time some new technology comes out to automate police work people get all worked up. License place scanners, facial recognition, police drones, now this. Its almost as if people don't want the police to be effective at enforcing the law. We have the same problem now with illegal immigration. People do not want border patrol to enforce the immigration law because its somehow racist but yet they have no problem with the current law. Its almost as if people secretly all agree that the law is unjust but rather than change the law they fight to make the enforcement of it harder. Its as if everyone knows that it is impossible to not be a law breaker with so many laws. Like everyone knows that if every law was enforced with 100% efficiency and impartiality that society would grind to a stop. Instead it is selectively enforced and people somehow tell themselves that selectively enforced laws can somehow be unbiased.

  30. Understanding crime in the UK by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    Its about total control over an area by criminals to sell anything they want and make a profit.
    Control over an area to commit crime in.
    Criminals get to act the way they do due to a lack of police and poor quality laws.

    How to fix UK crime problems.
    Bring back the police from "internet" comments speech policing and put them back onto community policing down every street.
    Stop and search in any area that has a crime problem to look for tools of crime and stolen items.

    Give education the money and support needed to look after people into university, plumbing/electrical jobs, arts, sport, languages, music.
    Support the people who will never study, cant study, won't study.
    That gives a pathway out of crime to further education, study, work and stops the idea that crime was due to the lack of support.

    What to do about crime in the streets?
    Understand who is doing the crime with voice prints, smart phone tracking and the use of CCTV in new ways..
    Map the crime in every area of the UK. The demographics, the type of crime. Who is doing crime, the support networks, the buying from the criminal, the sale, who is then buying a stolen smart phone.
    What ISP they then connect with and "expect" to use a stolen smart phone.
    Who is stealing, who is protecting an area, who is selling stolen goods, who is buying stolen goods.
    Why local police wont act. Who is holding back police an any area. Laws? Politics? Change out all corrupt virtue signaling and political police structures.
    Detect all police who are corrupt and who allowed crime to enter an area. Was it for money? Faith? Politics? Career advancement? A political quota system without looking into every officers past?
    Find out why the police are corrupt. Any community connection by corrupt police with criminals over generations?
    Test for criminals ability to access and if given police files, advanced notice of police methods and plans. Who in the police are helping criminals every day?
    Are police talking to the press, media? Detect all such efforts and alter methods to make such police look like they where always part of a long term undercover police work. Criminals will then trust police who are corrupt less.
    Make been corrupt part of a police investigation and a huge risk.

    Police advancement should only be on merit. Get some mutual loyalty back into the police and away from direct political control over methods.
    Criminals know the average UK police time needed to respond in any area. Change that average time up.
    Expect every gov/mil/police officer to be tracked when entering a police station by criminals with their own facial recognition systems.
    Stop expecting undercover and long term police work to be secure out of any police stations and gov/mil buildings.
    Learn from police methods, SAS, GCHQ, MI5/6, Royal Ulster Constabulary Special Branch and what was done to and in Ireland and any nation that supported Ireland.
    Make UK policing very secret, totally unexpected and very direct again.
    More of the same old CCTV will not work. Criminals dont show their face when doing crime and know to change clothing, transport every time.
    Tracking crime has to get past the ability to feel secure when doing crime.
    A person on a moped using a helmet will not show on CCTV facial tracking.
    The vehicle registration plates will be fake, removed from another scooter.
    The stolen smart phone will be off, not carried for long.
    Gait is the only factor that can be detected. Buy into advanced gait detection software as registration plates and face detection will not work.
    Set 100's of undercover police out with tracking/malware smart phones as bait to be stolen. The GUI on the stolen smart phone will allow a power on/off but the tracking will be battery powered and always on.
    The criminal will then have to use a faraday cage and never be sure if the device stolen and been sold is tracked. Full of police malware tracking?
    Wh

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    1. Re:Understanding crime in the UK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone needs to kill you and people like you. People like you would turn the whole planet into a gulag where you're born into captivity and never get out. You'd make every nation on the planet into a police state with zero freedom and zero privacy.

  31. Re:Racist faggot Gayenne isnt trying to solve raci by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about we 'feed' the 'racist faggot' some rat poison? Works for me.

  32. Re:The UK already imposes sentence on pure suspici by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    That was for Ireland and bank crime.
    Getting caught with the tools for a crime on the way to do a crime.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  33. Cholera; Minority Report by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    Last night I watched the latest episode of Victoria on Masterpiece (PBS, if you didn't know). There was a cholera outbreak in London, and in their 19th century mindset, only 1 person out of several so-called 'experts' actually figured out what the real source of the outbreak was, while the other 'experts', including the ostensible Minister of Health, had wild, unsubstantiated 'theories' (using the word in the loosest sense possible here), which included things like "foreigners brought it with them, we should get rid of all the filthy foreigners". Of course the real cause was tracked down in a rational, logical manner by a stuttering doctor, who tracked it to a well that everyone in the outbreak area was using to get their water from.

    Take from that story what you will; there is a relevant meaning to it, you just have to look.

    **********

    ..in a more direct comment about the featured article:
    Are we really going to unironicaly play the Minority Report card in actual law enforcement? Basically, take 'profiling' (comma, racial, I'm sure) to this extreme? Especially with the half-assed excuse for AI they keep applying to every damned thing? So much for the presumption of innocence, I guess. Reminds me of a bad joke a Latino comedian made once; he said "cops always follow around behind you when you're driving because they know sooner or later you'll do something wrong". You tell someone they're 'bad' often enough, they start believing it themselves. What's worse: shitty excuse for AI getting it wrong, and people minding their own business get watched constantly until someone 'decides' you did something wrong -- because cops never, ever plant evidence or otherwise 'manufacture' reasonable cause, and they never coerce people into false confessions.

  34. Here in the UK... by Chas · · Score: 1

    We have hate crime and thought crime and now FUTURE CRIME!

    WHEE!

    Because stopping ACTUAL crimes (like grooming gangs, child rape, truck-of-peace, home invasions, etc) are all too much trouble!

    We have have our personnel just sit safely behind a desk and "arrest" people all day long this way!

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  35. Being investigated isn't harmless by joe_frisch · · Score: 1

    The problem is the crime predicting software may cause police to investigate people against whom there is no solid evidence. Investigation is not harmless -it can cause significant inconvenience and in some cases physical risk. It can also uncover minor crimes that are committed by many people, but usually not noticed. So harm can be caused to people without anything like due process.

    Its very difficult to keep bias out of machine learning data sets. If past bias has caused an unusually high number of arrests for some minority group, information that is a proxy for membership in that group will cause more investigations, which will lead to a higher rate of detected crimes and a positive feedback. Its exactly the same sort of feedback that operates with humans, but without the higher reasoning functions that allow some humans to counteract this pattern matching.

  36. Re:Racist faggot Gayenne isnt trying to solve raci by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get back on your meds. Your paranoid schizophrenia is flaring up again, and seems to be compounded with a case of Tourette's.

  37. Re:Gayenne the racist coward here to dither again. by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

    You're 100% correct. White privilege only works in coastal blue states. I'm glad we can all agree on that.

  38. Re:Could be Good... IS Doubleplusungood. by Errol+backfiring · · Score: 1

    I think the British know perfectly well what thoughtcrime is. Yes, it could be used to check which areas needs more locks. However, criminals adapt much faster than statistics. All other implementations are very unbellythinkful.

    --
    Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
  39. Re:The UK already imposes sentence on pure suspici by mjwx · · Score: 1

    That was for Ireland and bank crime.
    Getting caught with the tools for a crime on the way to do a crime.

    That is what the software is needed for. To continually tell Americans that the Republic of Ireland (ROI) is a completely different nation to the United Kingdom of England, Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland, Crown Dependencies and British Overseas Territories... None of which include the ROI.

    --
    Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.