Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Are Custom Android ROMs Still a Thing?

Thelasko writes: Reading Kashmir Hill's series Goodby Big Five on Gizmodo made me consider switching to a custom Android ROM like LineageOS again. The Gizmodo articles make it seem that most phones are so locked down it is almost impossible to do. My last experience with custom ROMs confirmed that to be true for me. Is anyone having success? Why is LineageOS making builds for 185 devices if no one can use them?

166 comments

  1. old phones?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    old phones??

    1. Re: old phones?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed

      H Herpa D
      E Derpa E
      R Herpa R
      P Derpa P
      A Herpa A

  2. Derp summary summarized : by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Why is LineageOS making builds for 185 devices if no one can use them" = you have yet to prove that nobody can use them, only that you cannot.

    1. Re:Derp summary summarized : by Krakadoom · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Uhm, that's why he's asking if people can actually use them. The last question is rhetorical. ....

  3. One possible reason... by Penguinisto · · Score: 5, Informative

    Just because you (the average consumer) can't use it on a phone you got from $carrier, doesn't mean that others can't put it to use.

    That's not meant to be an insult, by the way... unlocked phones (that are truly unlocked, not just 'unlocked' to allow a different carrier w/ the same tech) can be loaded with the ROM and taken to town.

    PS: If you're gonna talk about it, then be kind and provide a link to LineageOS, mm'kay? :)

    --
    Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    1. Re:One possible reason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You could link to the phones you are talking about as well. Seems like the more important link than an easily guessable / searchable lineage link.

    2. Re:One possible reason... by Immerman · · Score: 1

      That wouldn't be a link, it'd be a database. Seems to me many/most phones are available in completely unlocked form direct from the manufacturer at the full outrageous price, as well as in various degrees of network-locked models. If you want a phone that can install a custom ROM, do your research beforehand, and make sure you're getting the *exact* model that supports it, rather than the indistinguishably different model that does not. As a quick test, if the phone is in any way branded by any network, it's a good bet it's firmly locked. Not that the lack of such branding is any guarantee it *will* work, but you can at least avoid the flashing warning lights.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    3. Re:One possible reason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those are carrier-unlocked. You still can't get at the bootloader/recovery/OS for most "unlocked" phones.

    4. Re:One possible reason... by Dracos · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Android, as well as the rest of the mobile space, is not meant to serve the user: it's meant to serve handset manufacturers, carriers, and app developers, and content providers, everyone except the user.

      I'll get another mobile device when it actually feels like mine, not something that seeks to abuse and exploit me at every opportunity.

    5. Re:One possible reason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Android, as well as the rest of the mobile space, is not meant to serve the user: it's meant to serve handset manufacturers, carriers, and app developers, and content providers, everyone except the user.

      Hence the custom ROMs. They give control back to the user. At this point the general public really should be saying: "No custom ROM support? No sale." and sticking by it. It's what I do. Especially now that we all know with absolute certainty just how much data these things are meant to collect us, and how irresponsible they are with that collected data.

      The next time you buy a phone, look at the support pages for the custom ROM you wish to use and pick a device from their supported list. Alternatively you can choose a Project Treble device like the ones listed here. Those will work with any GSI, or Generic System Image, that you can get your hands on and should be how things will work moving forward. Personally, I'm using a Moto G6 currently. Don't be afraid to ask on XDA if you have questions or need help either.

      I'll get another mobile device when it actually feels like mine, not something that seeks to abuse and exploit me at every opportunity.

      Ownership comes with responsibility. That responsibility starts with you choosing a device you can actually call your own. The groups you indicated cater to the irresponsible because it makes them the most money, and try to force everyone else to be irresponsible as well to further bolster their profits. Don't let them do that. To you or anyone else you know. It may be painful to do so, but it's part of being responsible.

    6. Re: One possible reason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like this one, when it comes out in a couple of months?
      https://puri.sm/products/librem-5/

    7. Re:One possible reason... by nnull · · Score: 5, Informative

      The problem is, Samsung and now LG are selling phones to the US market that can't be rooted, making these roms useless. Sony lets you root but they gimp the camera so much that it negates the benefits of rooting their phones.

      And by the way, I love lineage, but when more unrootable and unlockable bootloader phones flood the US market, it's making it very difficult to find a device that lets you load up lineage on your phone. Just look on the XDA forums. There's an ongoing attempt to root the LG40 with massive failure. The US Version of the Samsung S9 can't be rooted. And of course you get the whole "You don't need to root your phone anymore, trust in Samsung and LG guys, they know what they're doing *wink*" posters all over the place.

      And yes, I know I can buy international phones from Ebay easily, but the point is, US devices are being gimped on purpose.

    8. Re: One possible reason... by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      You don't seem to understand what the word "user" means in this context. The user is the person who purchases the phone to use it. Use in this case means the turn it on and proceed to ... What's is the word I'm looking for? ... To *use* it? ... yeah, that's the ticket! It will probably come as a surprise to you that outside of your mother's basement there are many, many people who do just that. They aren't worried about a locked bootloader for the entirely reasonable reason that they have no idea what the hell a bootloader is. Believe it or not the millions of phones sold are quite usable. I know the idea that millions of people would buy phones that weren't designed to be usable makes a lot of sense, but much to your surprise, apparently, most of those people find their phones to be quite useful as shipped and have no desire to replace the factory firmware.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    9. Re: One possible reason... by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 2

      Someone should invent links to sites that use a database in some way. Something like a mySql / maria database which is accessed by PHP, or Python, or ... Oh wait!

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    10. Re: One possible reason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone should invent a textual representation of a list of items, like printing the name of each item (perhaps both a commercial name and a technical name) followed by a newline character.

    11. Re:One possible reason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because you (the average consumer) can't use it on a phone you got from $carrier, doesn't mean that others can't put it to use.

      Not every country does the whole carrier-locked phones.
      In many places the consumer looks around and buys the phone they want and then they either move the SIM-card and keeps the carrier from their old phone or they shop around for a new one.

      The US has an oligopoly that prevents the free market from working as intended and the government doesn't seem to want to regulate the companies involved.

    12. Re:One possible reason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Glad you noticed paid shilling on all privacy-related articles.

      Also, if you don't look what you buy beforehand, you are out of luck. Don't buy any phone that cannot run Lineage OS. That means buying 1 year old phones from eBay, maybe even import some from other markets, if the US market doesn't cater to that. And accept worse quality from the camera. Then carry a good little compact camera on your vacation.

      If these convenience trade-offs are not worth considering for improving your privacy, pushing back Google and valuing your freedom of choice / freedom to own your devices, then you have made a choice and declared that convenience is your primary motivator. This validates the various manufacturers who make you trade convenience for safety / privacy / ownership to do more.

      Unless you start sacrificing convenience for privacy and safety, you will NEVER make any inroads in being dominated by your gadgets and you absolutely deserve everything you get from that. It is your choice and you're getting it.

    13. Re:One possible reason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In Europe, there is a regulation to protect users against such practices as it forbids the phone vendor to "lock" a phone.
      As buyer, you have the right to use the hardware in whatever way you like. (Obviously, you can not use it to break other laws, this does have other implications, such as warranty, liability etc...)

      In America, you seems to be very much against any form of government regulation, and I understand the fear of potential future misuse.
      Unfortunately you seem to fail to realize you are being misused by a lot of companies ate this very moment.

    14. Re:One possible reason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if nobody in the US of A is able to use a custom bootloader, there will be no developers for it, effectively ensuring USA is not "first" or "great" at it.

    15. Re:One possible reason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those are carrier-unlocked. You still can't get at the bootloader/recovery/OS for most "unlocked" phones.

      Not for most phones. But there are some. The fairphone, if this is the sort of thing you care about.

    16. Re:One possible reason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yes, I know I can buy international phones from Ebay easily, but the point is, US devices are being gimped on purpose.

      So what is the problem then. The US masses buy their sorry locked phones. The few who wants a rootable phone, buys it on Ebay or some European/Asiatic webshop. Everybody gets what they deserve.

    17. Re: One possible reason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But they cry to mommy state when the phoney whoney doesn't do what they thought it would. WAAAAHH, why is it treating me like, like..... a user?

    18. Re: One possible reason... by n0nsensical · · Score: 1

      Bootloader locking has absolutely nothing to do with carrier locking and it's 100% legal worldwide because if it weren't iPhones would be illegal.

    19. Re: One possible reason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here you have a link to a giant database with all the info you need:
      www.google.com

    20. Re:One possible reason... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      If you are going to install a custom ROM on these phones anyway, why buy an expensive Samsung or LG model when you can just buy a Chinese one for 1/3rd the price and it's unlocked for you already?

      OnePlus, Xiaomi and many others make really great hardware, sometimes let down by some not so great software, but you are replacing that anyway.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    21. Re:One possible reason... by Thad+Boyd · · Score: 1

      I'm hoping that this is the year that GNU/Linux phones become usable.

      I'm not talking about usable for end users, of course; I don't expect that day will ever come. But I mean usable to, well, the sort of person who posts on Slashdot; the sort of person who was using Linux on the desktop 15 or 20 years ago.

      I've got one phone that I'm using as a test device for Ubuntu Touch (discontinued by Canonical but still under development by UBports). It's not quite ready to use as a daily driver but it feels like it's getting close.

      There's also the Librem 5 coming (GNOME-based), and even the PinePhone (Plasma-based) sounds like it could be interesting, though if they really expect to sell it for $100 then I don't think the question is "what can you do with a Plasma phone?" so much as "what can you do with a $100 phone?"

    22. Re: One possible reason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to be pedantic, but that's an index. All databases contain indexes, but indexes are not necessarily databases.

    23. Re:One possible reason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Common, how is that different from many others 'vital parts of society'. You identify the sucker i mean the customer and sell him what he craves i mean needs. You also need to stimulate that crave and remove all other bandits i mean competitors praying on your victim i mean customer.

      Doing a swindle while calling it with other name doesn't really help anything does it? Or maybe you are being naive and it does for you. Good luck.

    24. Re:One possible reason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bought a Finlux 65" HD TV a couple of years ago and it didn't require any agreements or Internet connection (it has 'smart' features but works fine without them).

  4. Yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I still run legacy OS on a few devices

  5. Locked bootloaders killed them by Dwedit · · Score: 2

    Locked bootloaders killed the custom Android OS on many different phones.

    1. Re:Locked bootloaders killed them by SIGBUS · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not only that, but even if your bootloader is unlockable, that doesn't necessarily mean that you will find any ROMS, and even if you do you might find things not working, such as VoLTE. That latter issue makes a custom ROM a non-starter for my three-year-old LG.

      --
      Oh, no! You have walked into the slavering fangs of a lurking grue!
    2. Re:Locked bootloaders killed them by Hall · · Score: 1

      I saw builds where the stock camera app didn't work and you had to download a separate one. Or even if you got a workaround for the camera, no video recording capability. Saw many that lacked VoLTE like you mention too and people blew it off like it was a non-issue - "dont u understand what beta means???? its not a DD!!!"

    3. Re:Locked bootloaders killed them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed; when I bought my phone in 2016 I was careful to make sure I ordered the unlocked, non-carrier version of the model. Unfortunately, the only Lineage builds for my model are for the T-Mobile version.

    4. Re: Locked bootloaders killed them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The solution for this "problem" is simple: Buy just phones that have unlockable bootloaders.

      I've been doing this for the last 8 years with much success.

    5. Re:Locked bootloaders killed them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Specifically this happens because a handset stopped supporting Android after a certain version and thus no longer provides drivers for newer kernels/versions of android userland. So developers have to go through hacks to get the old device binary blobs working which don't really work because of new mitigations in later versions of Android.

      So no, you are not guaranteed support when your closed source manufacturer no longer provides code to non-GPL parts of the system that is required for functionality. Thanks for playing though, your lowuid brought me back to the trolling days of 1997!

    6. Re:Locked bootloaders killed them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The issue I remember most is seeing "who uses FM radio anyway?", implying it's useless, you're an old gramps or maybe you're a dumb fuck.
      Phone calls are maybe 80 years older than commercial FM radio, so I can't wait for phone calls (all versions) to get dropped from the feature list.

    7. Re: Locked bootloaders killed them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This.

      But, it seems it's also an issue unique in US, where carriers are evil scum and for some reason don't let you choose your phone? Else why would everyone complain about locked phones all the time. Just don't vote with your wallet against your interests. Anyway, here in EU (at least NL) it's simple. Choose carrier, get simcard, choose unlockable phone, put sim in phone, done.

      An even better strategy that is IME 100% effective: If you want to run LineageOS, buy a phone that already has a working LineageOS. Following this, I have _never_ had a phone without LineageOS/Cyanogenmod.
      Though that really takes some research to choose a good model without showstopper bugs.

  6. Yes, but privacy and security a hard combination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Android rebuilds are great for privacy, but you end up having to sacrifice security of your data (if, for example, you lose your phone) by leaving the bootloader unlocked.

    I ended up having to create my own rebuild -- works great and a bit of work, but the process only works for Pixel and Nexus phones that have build configurations that are part of AOSP.

    Details at https://thermal.cnde.iastate.edu/aosp_build_instructions.xhtml

  7. Absolutely still a thing by schklerg · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I run it on my One Plus & Samsung tablet. I will not buy a device that doesn't let me root it & run Lineage. It also enables me to run adaway & block trackers and other stupid parts of the android ecosystem which I do not like. I may eventually move to Purism & LibreOS though. Privacy respecting technology is unfortunately not mainstream, but it matters to some of us.

    --
    Be Excellent To Each Other
    1. Re:Absolutely still a thing by hojo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I am in the same boat. I won't buy a device until I research its support by Lineage.

      Anything other than unlocked is a dead end. I refuse to struggle to deal with artificial barriers on a product I ostensibly own.

      If I can't block ads and restrict what any given application can access, then I don't trust the device. All of my devices are rooted and customized by me.

    2. Re: Absolutely still a thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Good luck with that on your next purchase. You'll end up stuck with a 3+ year-old refurb or a low-end Chinese-made phone. Virtually every new phone released into North America or EMEA is now locked down with dm-verity in hardware.
      If privacy and bloatware you can't remove are a concern, then you can count out OnePlus, Moto, ZTE, TCL (including Nokia), Xiaomi, or Huawei... the spyware resides in a Chairman Xi-approved proprietary baseband chip that does not expose its operations to the android kernel.
      Don't believe me? Google it, FFS. There have been at least a dozen separate occurrences in the last two years of spyware / adware pushed to these devices by FOTA and have been documented beaconing out even without having a running OS.

      Not just being a dick here... but making the point that good, trustworthy daily drivers are entirely crippled by crapware and it can't be fixed by something as awesome as Lineage because dm-verity prevents it. Never mind trying to continue using that expensive device once the magic two-year window hits... and the maufacturer decides to stop supporting the hardware with OS updates.

      Personally, I think the fix is to get behind the right-to-repair movement and sue Qualcomm / Intel / Samsung / Avago (aka broadcomm). Going after the SOC manufacturers and compelling them to either remove dm-verity at the chip level and unlock bootloaders or force them to sign FOSS developers' custom ROMs would put the whole ecosystem back on track.

    3. Re:Absolutely still a thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sooner people realize there's no privacy online or in public, the better

    4. Re: Absolutely still a thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      China spyware do not bother me.
      I do not travel to China. OTOH I do travel to the US. so three letters spying does bother me.
      Esp. with US legal system.

    5. Re:Absolutely still a thing by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I refuse to struggle to deal with artificial barriers

      Which barriers? That is ultimately the question that matters to people. The barriers are few for many people.

      If I can't block ads and restrict what any given application can access

      Restricting on a per application basis is handled by the core OS already. Blocking adverts is restricted by the browser. For the most part everything else is just being too cheap to pay for apps. I don't see adverts, why do you?

      This isn't me taking a dig at you, but rather pointing out why support will ultimately decrease and not increase for customising. In the past rooting and installing a custom ROM was an absolute necessity. These days ... well I couldn't justify the effort which makes me wonder why anyone except an extremely niche market would. And being an extremely niche market doesn't bode well in the world of general purpose consumer electronics.

    6. Re:Absolutely still a thing by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Note that you don't need root to block ads. Adaway uses the hosts file, but apps like DNS66 and Blockada (both open source) do the same thing without root. I recommend DNS66.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    7. Re: Absolutely still a thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perfect solution fallacy.
      Because of some nebulous chinese chip, it is exactly the same as having facebook etc preloaded on the phone and having to buy new devices every 2 years. Got it. You are painfully stupid.

    8. Re:Absolutely still a thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You get official upgrades and security updates for several years. And then it stops and you accumulate known vulnerabilities.
      If you want to continue updating, you need a custom ROM.

      Previous phone was Galaxy S from 2010, used it until 2016 (replaced due to RAM shortage).
      Then I got a second hand Galaxy S4 Mini from 2013(?) for €70, (3x the RAM so) still good for many years.
      So for me with these phones lasting so long, a custom ROM is quite useful.
      (And also to get rid of the Google apps)

      Though if you like buying a new phone every few years and don't care for resale value, this neglect of maintenance might not bother you.
      And since recently there are "Enterprise Recommended" phones with 5 years security updates, that's a lot less bad.

    9. Re: Absolutely still a thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What matters is that some devices are officially (without weird exploits) unlockable.
      Yes, there are lots of other devices that aren't, but so what, fuck them. Just vote with your wallet.

      Off the top of my head, at least Motorola, Sony, and I believe Xiaomi have unlock procedures. And IIRC the Nexus/Pixel phones were even actively pushed to upstream Linux by Google themselves and have always been unlockable.
      Still plenty to choose from!

      Trusted boot is a useful protection against certain exploits. And yes that needs to be at the chip level for it to be trusted (in the computer meaning of the word).
      Unlocking comprimises that, and most people don't want LineageOS, and most people choose phones that aren't unlockable. So why then would they make unlockable phones?

      People just need to educate themselves. Do you want to be able to put a different OS on, or modify it (when official support stops)? Then choose an unlockable phone. As long as people keep throwing their money at those future paperweights (for whatever reason), they will keep making them.

      Then again, I don't live in the US with the power drunk carriers demanding locked bootloaders (heard something like that)

  8. Warranty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I can't risk voiding my warranty. I tinkered with these things when a smartphone was just a gadget. Now I depend on it.

    1. Re:Warranty by mrbester · · Score: 1

      Anybody that told you that your warranty was void for flashing a ROM, or even unlocking the bootloader was lying through their teeth.

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
    2. Re:Warranty by fuzzywig · · Score: 1
      I unlocked the bootloader on my Motorola (you just go onto their website and they will give you a code), and now every time I turn it on I get a message saying that because the bootloader is unlocked, my warranty is void. So in this case is the manufacturer lying to me?

      Not that I'm bothered, it wasn't an expensive phone, and I doubt anything that goes wrong with it would fall under the warranty either, even if it hadn't run out already.

    3. Re:Warranty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. The warranty is guaranteed to 2 years after purchase by European law.
      Maybe different in the US.

  9. MANY phones can be fully unlocked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MANY phones can be fully unlocked and I only buy those that can be. For example I mostly use Motorola phones from carriers that allow unlocking. Motorola makes it relatively easy to get the unlock codes right off their website. A nice T-Mobile Motorola phone is top.

    Just don't go Verizon, AT&T, TracPhone, etc. Those bastards don't let you unlock your own hardware even when the hardware manufacturer allows it. Fuck them. I will never pay for service from them for that reason alone.

    1. Re:MANY phones can be fully unlocked by ctilsie242 · · Score: 1

      Motorola, HTC, and I think Sony all allow unlocking. Even some Samsung devices as well.

      Anything from Huawei and other places which are custom ROM hostile... avoid like the plague.

    2. Re:MANY phones can be fully unlocked by sexconker · · Score: 2

      Just don't go Verizon, AT&T, TracPhone, etc. Those bastards don't let you unlock your own hardware even when the hardware manufacturer allows it. Fuck them. I will never pay for service from them for that reason alone.

      They're required by law to SIM/carrier unlock the device upon request, provided you own it.

      Bootloader unlocking? None of the people at Verizon, ATT, etc. know how to do that, even if the manufacturer allows it on a stock device.
      Verizon, ATT, etc. farm out their "customization" (bloatware and spyware) to China and locked down firmware and bootloaders come as part of the deal. Unless you're a three letter agency, you'll never get Verizon, ATT, etc. to contact and try to communicate with the people in China who worked on that shit a year or more ago and forgot everything.

    3. Re: MANY phones can be fully unlocked by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      Buy the phone outright and you avoid all that shit.

    4. Re: MANY phones can be fully unlocked by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Nope. If you buy it from a carrier you get their custom image on it, and locked bootloader. And if the hardware manufacturer allows it, you get shitty radio firmwares that restrict the use of the phone on networks that use other bands. You'd need to unlock it, flash a custom ROM, and flash a custom radio firmware.

      I had to do this when taking my Note II from ATT to TMobile. Putting just the stock TMobile ROM on the device would limit you to 3G bands, even though the hardware was fully capable of 4G LTE.

    5. Re: MANY phones can be fully unlocked by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      I bought my last two phones outright and used them with a SIM-only contract. Is that not possible in the US?

    6. Re: MANY phones can be fully unlocked by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 1

      It's definitely possible. I have 5 phones right now for my family which (with the US version) are GSM & CDMA dual SIM devices from Motorola which work just fine using more than one network even. The easiest is of course to actually buy a never locked phone directly, not to rent/lease/purchase one from a carrier and then have to jump through hoops later to get it unlocked.

      --
      The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
    7. Re: MANY phones can be fully unlocked by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Of course it is. I'm on a prepaid monthly plan that costs $30 (total, no added taxes/fees) for unlimited data and text and 100 minutes of voice (which I never use).

      However many people still buy their phones through a carrier or at a carrier-infested retailer like Best Buy.

    8. Re: MANY phones can be fully unlocked by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      I was referring to buying a stock phone from the manufacturer or a retailer and avoiding all the crap that gets loaded afterwards.

  10. Yes, but it gets harder and harder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's still a thing, but it's less popular now and harder to do. Phones are being locked down harder and harder, with the most common vulnerabilities fixed. Rooting them is becoming a more and more iffy proposition, some models can't be at all as far as anyone knows and most people simply do not want to bother with the risk and the bother.

    So yes, it still exists, but the scene is getting smaller and smaller all the time.

  11. Moto phones are unlocked by lactose99 · · Score: 1

    Have LineageOS running on a couple older Moto G phones as they're unlocked from the factory.

    --
    Fully licensed blockchain psychiatrist
    1. Re:Moto phones are unlocked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Newer Motos are locked unfortunately. If you contact Motorola for an unlock code, they'll give it to you and then void your warranty in their system.

    2. Re:Moto phones are unlocked by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      Newer Motos are locked unfortunately. If you contact Motorola for an unlock code, they'll give it to you and then void your warranty in their system.

      That's going to last right up until someone bothers to sue them over it. At least here in the USA, that's illegal.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Moto phones are unlocked by Galactic+Dominator · · Score: 2

      What is this USA of which you speak? Because of how you describe it, I know it's not related to the SOTU tonight.

      --
      brandelf -t FreeBSD /brain
    4. Re:Moto phones are unlocked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well, with the silly 1 year warranty you don't really lose much anyway, do you?

    5. Re:Moto phones are unlocked by mrbester · · Score: 1

      Illegal this side of the pond as well. We probably had it as illegal first due to better customer protection legislation.

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
    6. Re:Moto phones are unlocked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's been illegal in the us since the 70s

    7. Re: Moto phones are unlocked by n0nsensical · · Score: 1

      Warranties are a joke anyway. Hardware is designed to have MTBF just barely longer than the warranty period, and even if you're one of the unlucky or should I say lucky ones, the paperwork and shipping and extreme wait times for warranty service make the whole process a joke. In almost every case you're saving yourself a whole lot of stress, time, and likely money by simply buying another one.

  12. Unlocked Bootloader by thevirtualcat · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's not impossible. It just requires doing your research before you buy. There are two things you need to look for.

    1. Unlockable Bootloader

    This is challenging because many OEMs will require you to go through a bunch of steps intended to make doing so as difficult as possible (beyond what is needed for data security.) There have been instances of OEMs just outright lying when it comes to bootloader unlockability. And of course, even phones that are to be unlockable have that disabled from some carriers. (Verizon, especially. Even Pixel devices can't easily have their bootloaders unlocked when purchased through Verizon.)

    2. Community Support

    LineageOS and xda-developers are good place to start. Popular flagship phones are more likely to have good community support around them if they're unlockable. Of course, you can always try to build AOSP for your own device, but community support will still be invaluable as most OEMs play pretty fast and loose with releasing their GPL code. (It's often difficult to get a fully working AOSP build with that the OEM gives you.)

    1. Re:Unlocked Bootloader by ctilsie242 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Community support is important. I have obtained phones and unlocked the bootloader... only to find that there are no ROMs available, and the only real option you have is to use a factory ROM with Magisk, so you continue to receive updates. This is better than nothing, but the best thing going is LineageOS.

      I wish XDA would have a list of phones, which would be maintained/updated often (at least monthly) of phones to buy that are easily unlockable or rootable. That way, someone doesn't buy a Huawei device and then wonder why they can't do anything with it.

    2. Re:Unlocked Bootloader by thevirtualcat · · Score: 1

      This is the reason I've stuck to Nexus and Pixel for my last few phones in spite of their shortcomings. It's the path of least resistance.

  13. The big hurdle is the locked bootloader. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once you've got the code to unlock the bootloader, installing a custom ROM is actually pretty easy. The problem is that several manufacturers have decided that you shouldn't be able to unlock the bootloader or that you need to jump through some hoops before they'll allow you to unlock it. Can you imagine if we were talking about PCs? You can't install an operating system, not even a clean install of the same operating system, unless the manufacturer of the PC allows it? It's ridiculous.

    1. Re:The big hurdle is the locked bootloader. by sims+2 · · Score: 1

      https://linux.slashdot.org/sto...

      https://tech.slashdot.org/stor...

      We've gotten to talk about PCs here before.

      --
      Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
  14. loaded questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "if no one can use them?"

    come on now

    such clickbait might get you a job at BuzzFeed for a few weeks, before code camp

  15. PixelExperience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    I bought the midrange Moto X4 last fall when my Nexus 5X died. Motorola's website allowed me to unlock the bootloader (with the caveat that this voided the warranty). After that, I have installed different variants of Pie roms. I found Lineage 16 to be OK but my on-screen buttons would disappear, especially when I switched users. I now enjoy the PixelExperience Pie rom which gives me a lot of flexibility with settings like dark mode which are coming to regular Android but are not there yet. I also was able to find some great Magisk (rooted) modules, including one that significantly improves the sound of my cheap bluetooth audio headset. I even used root mode to use my microsd card as adoptable storage which is not enabled by Motorola.

    So, yes, Android roms are alive and well, despite what some "expert" at Gizmodo says. xda-developers website has a plethora of information.

    1. Re:PixelExperience by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      I picked up an X4 Google Fi Android One) knowing about the limitation, but thought it was because of Oreo and would go away when i got Pie..

      --
      Good-bye
  16. Yes, sure. by aglider · · Score: 1, Interesting

    LineageOS Is lighter, faster, better. Zero bloatware, continuous development.
    Need more?

    --
    Sent as ripples into the electromagnetic field. No single photon has been harmed in the process.
  17. Phone Rooting Info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Many phones can be rooted still.

    One of the places to look is the XDA Developers website https://www.xda-developers.com/root/

    1. Re: Phone Rooting Info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rooting *is not* unlocking the bootloader so you can load a custom ROM.
      Ask anyone with a qualcomm chipset and dm-verity enabled.

  18. Google+ by Hall · · Score: 2

    I got the email a few days ago from Google telling me how Google+ is shutting down (already knew this, of course) so I logged in to my account. Haven't been there in probably 2-3 years. My "communities" are almost all custom Android ROM groups or other Android software. Even a ROM like LiquidSmooth has effectively died. They announced in early '16 that all development had stopped ("devs are too busy or moved on to other things") but some re-start occurred in late '17 but little indication if it went anywhere.

    I'm not trying to be American-centric but with Verizon and ATT being the pre-dominant carriers in the US and if I'm not mistaken, locking down their devices, it really hurt custom ROMs for many. I used to have Samsung Galaxy phones and after they locked them down, that was it for me.... If you had any hope of a custom ROM, you had to have the latest and greatest model because support for older ones was pretty much non-existent. I think someone or some group gained bootloader access but it wasn't back-portable nor were they interested in working on it. I remember lots of "bounties" offered too.

    Still appears to be activity with TWRP and XPOSED Framework.

    1. Re: Google+ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you buy phones from your carrier ? You can't order it from an independent seller ?

      All my Sony devices can be unlocked (tablet z, xa2, z5) as well as my old Samsung phones (s2 and s3 mini). I never had a device not supported by cyanogen/lineageos.

  19. Very happy user of LineageOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am very happy.

    Installed LineageOS - a lot of carrier crap went away and phone is 50% faster now.

    Extends life of my phone by another 2 years.

    1. Re:Very happy user of LineageOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just do not buy phone not supported by LineageOS

  20. Yup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Using a custom rom called "Pixel Experience" based on the stock Android 9 rom for the Pixel phones on my Nexus 6P which no longer gets official updates.

    Not only is my Nexus 6P still really fast but there's nothing wrong with the hardware. By having it be unlocked I have gotten way more life out of this phone then I otherwise would have.

    I refuse to buy any device that doesn't come with the ability to root.

    1. Re:Yup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you use Google Pay? Netflix?

  21. LineageOS - still great for Android tablets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I undersand this doesn't help with the carrier-locking issue for phones, but the situation is a little different for tablets. I installed LineageOS on a Nexux 7 (2013) that Google abandoned, and I more than appreciate the continuous updates that it receives. LineageOS has greatly extended the lifespan of this perfectly functional device, and running it allows me to use it with the peace of mind from knowning it's at least receiving security patches.

  22. Is it even really worth the effort for most folks? by King_TJ · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I remember playing with custom ROMs like Cyanogen, years ago, with my Samsung Galaxy phone on Sprint's network. Even back then, it created a lot of headaches for me. Nothing insurmountable, ultimately, but it wreaked havoc with things like Sprint's "visual voicemail" on the phone until some special patch came out to fix it, and there were bugs for a while where the phone would stop ringing on incoming calls.

    After that, I swore off the custom ROM hacks, because I needed my cellphone for work as well as for just personal calls and entertainment. It's not worth having some cool new features and custom UI if it means I miss a few important client calls or the phone gets unstable when I'm counting on it.

    (I wound up pretty much moving myself to the iPhone as I got more invested in the whole Apple ecosystem, and except for the stupid high cost of the latest XS series phones, I haven't regretted that a bit. If Apple doesn't start offering more bang for the buck by the time I'm ready to upgrade phones again, I *might* switch back to an Android. All depends on what the landscape looks like then, I guess. I'm good for another couple of years, I think.)

    But I did have to tinker with the low-cost Androids again, trying to find my teenager a phone to use on a budget. I'm really disappointed in those options. Went with a Motorola E4 as seemingly the best of a bad bunch of cheap ones. At least it has the fingerprint reader on it and more RAM than most. Unfortunately, I couldn't put it on her "SimpleMobile" plan like I wanted to (they use T-Mobile's network), as it was carrier locked to Verizon. People told me, when I bought it, that "That's no big deal! Just pay a few bucks for an unlock code off the Internet and you're good to go!" Well, I'm finding out now that nobody does unlock codes for these anymore. All you get are some shady foreign people who want you to give them TeamViewer access to your Windows PC with the phone attached to it, to unlock it for you for a price. I've paid 3 different people now and not one has actually tried to remote in and do the job. Starting to wonder if it's all just a big scam?

  23. Buy one of these... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://wiki.lineageos.org/devices/

  24. Some are charging money to unlock boot loader by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

    I recently picked up a Huawei mate 20 (non pro)
    It's ridiculously fast, insane battery life, ok camera and my version does not have an IDIOT curved display. (Bye Samsung!)

    But I did just hear they charge to unlock the boot loader, I'm not sure how I feel about that. I tend not to load custom ROMs on as much as I used to, but still seems kinda bad.

    Before anyone makes privacy China comments, two things.

    1, I don't care, too much.
    2, if you're using Amazon, Google, Facebook, Twitter etc. Your privacy is just as boned just by a different country

    1. Re:Some are charging money to unlock boot loader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Your privacy is just as boned just by a different country" = Yeah, but a country with laws and jurisdiction to enforce them. = Not China. Huawei is a scam company, and you got sold on battery life, lol. Fucking moron lol.

      Congrats on not caring, that just means you keep your head below the waterline. Not that you're immune to being drowned.

    2. Re:Some are charging money to unlock boot loader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who is charging to unlock bootloaders? The only people I know charging for bootloader unlock codes were unofficial sources. I unlocked two Huawei phones sometime back directly through Huawei, no charge, no waiting period either. Both are running Lineage.

    3. Re:Some are charging money to unlock boot loader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am playing devil's advocate. Communist government got a hold of your data .... what's the worse could happen to you and me? Not much. It is not that they could come in to scope you from where you're. It is not the case with the other big brothers. Just saying.

    4. Re:Some are charging money to unlock boot loader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "what's the worse could happen to you and me? Not much." Bullshit, they have whole squads of hackers just to drain your bank account, nothing else. Who knows what they MIGHT do, we know what they DO DO.

      When was the last time the NSA leaked your credentials to a hacker group that then attacked your interests. Exactly. China did this TODAY.

      Being stupid is not a defense from nation/state intelligence.

    5. Re:Some are charging money to unlock boot loader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When was the last time the Chinese government did paranoid boy?

  25. Fewer communities, but in some ways stronger. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Still use Lineage on my Tegra based tablet, works fine.

    Would recommend getting a nexus or oneplus phone as I think they're bootloader unlockable from the factory.

    1. Re: Fewer communities, but in some ways stronger. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oneplus definitely are. My three year old Oneplus is still going strong thanks to Resurrection Remix with root and Magisk, Adaway etc.

  26. I can vouch for this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Huawei U8150 worked excellent since it was new. Every later phone from Samsung/LG had serious hardware issues if you used 3rd party roms. Stylus, Wifi/BT and Cameras.

    The U8150 had blobs for the wifi/bt (Broadcom) and probably similar issues for some of the odd bits and pieces, but the camera (an OVxxxx unit) worked out of box, as did voice, including dialer visibility, and even internet access (2g/3g only).

    The last device I tried had the dialer display broken (blank screen with touchscreen off) while calling or recieving calls and internet access almost never properly connects (I've seen it show up with an IP address twice.) NFC is also almost always broken.

    Even with these usability issues, I choose to use it because all I really need a phone for is text and recieving calls from others and being able to disable location services, blacklist app features, and ensure my phone's radio is off trump all the other issues. Having a removable battery doesn't hurt things either.

    Even with that all said, a truly libre phone will make the world a lot better place. Whether it is Purism or someone else, we desperately need it, and yet nobody seems to be funding it. Truly market economics at their worst.

    1. Re:I can vouch for this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unlocked bootloaders, Libre Purism, and other "paths to freedom" means you cannot use DRM apps like Spotify, Netflix, and the HBO app. I don't think you understand how many people in this world use these apps. Hint: the number is >100 million ergo the profit is on bootloader locked phones. Businesses only care about profit.

      Lather, rinse, repeat.

    2. Re: I can vouch for this. by reanjr · · Score: 2

      My laptop has an unlocked bootloader and Netflix works just fine.

    3. Re: I can vouch for this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same here. Netflix and Spotify even on Linux...for now.

    4. Re:I can vouch for this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't Firefox on desktop support these things? Maybe 480p Netflix. I don't know. It uses a user space, optional DRM shim. There's even Steam on Linux (and before that on Windows 9x, where everything is root).

    5. Re: I can vouch for this. by n0nsensical · · Score: 1

      My phone's bootloader is unlocked and all those apps work fine so I dunno what you're dealing with here. The ACs are especially clueless on this topic

    6. Re:I can vouch for this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You really think a phone should make it easy to change or replace the firmware? Most people don't, and no, it would not make the world a better place. That said, it would be nice to have finer control over what the apps are doing on there.

    7. Re: I can vouch for this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe Netflix works they just limit to 480p

  27. Project Treble by Namarrgon · · Score: 5, Informative

    In some ways we're now entering a golden age for Android roms, with the advent of Project Treble.

    All phones shipping with Android 8.0+ are required to support Treble's platform abstraction layer, making life dramatically easier for custom rom bakers, going forward. Older phones benefit too; once their idiosyncratic hardware support is adapted to Treble, they can also expect easier and more stable updates. Generic System Images (GSIs) are now the norm, and will more or less run on any compatible platform.

    --
    Why would anyone engrave "Elbereth"?
    1. Re:Project Treble by DigitAl56K · · Score: 1

      All phones shipping with Android 8.0+ are required to support Treble's platform abstraction layer

      Yeah? Call me when old phones actually start getting updates.

    2. Re:Project Treble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I call bullshit on "GSI are the norm". Name a SINGLE phone that actually supports using GSI (no, not "well i can root, bl-unlock my shiny phone and install a lineage-gsi, but actually out-of-the-box, just fastboot gsi.zip and it works). Also, Treble was a great idea, but google obviously still does not get that OEM do not WANT to provide updates, does not matter that treble would make it faster and easier to do). Bonus Points if you can name a phone where the OEM took the time to update a pre-8 device to treble...

    3. Re:Project Treble by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      Call me when old phones actually start getting updates.

      My Samsung Galaxy S5 runs Android 8.1 (LineageOS 15.1): it's not old enough to you?

    4. Re:Project Treble by Namarrgon · · Score: 1

      Name a SINGLE phone that actually supports using GSI

      Google's Pixel phones are the obvious examples, as they're designed for easy user unlocking. But any of the phones listed here or here can also be unlocked, and many of them like the recent-ish OnePlus, Xiaomi, and Huawei phones are easy to flash GSIs to. Other compatible phones may require root first, like with any pre-GSI custom rom. And any unlockable phone shipping with Android 8.0+ can run any of the many GSI roms - regardless of the vendor's (lack of) updates.

      Bonus Points if you can name a phone where the OEM took the time to update a pre-8 device to treble...

      Better, here's a whole list.

      --
      Why would anyone engrave "Elbereth"?
    5. Re:Project Treble by Namarrgon · · Score: 1

      There's a list here of phones that have been officially (and unofficially) updated to Treble . But this whole discussion is about how you don't have to wait for your vendor. If you want to update your phone, maybe look here.

      --
      Why would anyone engrave "Elbereth"?
    6. Re:Project Treble by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Your expectation that this will work retrospectively means you didn't read the linked article.

  28. It's getting too hard to bother with by realmolo · · Score: 2

    In the United States, it's damn hard to find a phone that can be unlocked, *and* can be used with Verizon. Verizon has their own custom phone/frequencies, unfortunately.

    If you are on T-Mobile or AT&T, things are better, but it's still hard to find good custom ROMs for most phones that anybody wants.

    But...custom ROMs aren't as useful as they used to be. Android has gotten a lot better, privacy-wise, and there are a variety of VPN-based ad-blocker/firewall apps. You can do just about everything you would've previously needed "root" for with something like AdGuard, and the default privacy controls in newer versions of Android.

    1. Re:It's getting too hard to bother with by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I don't care how good stock Android has gotten. For me the reason to run a custom rom is to run a clean OS free from Google's services. (Android might have got better, privacy-wise. But *Google* Android has gotten much, much worse.)

    2. Re:It's getting too hard to bother with by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In the United States, it's damn hard to find a phone that can be unlocked, *and* can be used with Verizon.

      There's your problem. Verizon is very owner / bootloader unlock unfriendly. If you use any other carrier you can literally go to Best Buy and find a phone to use with a custom ROM. (After doing some research first about what's available.) Buying crap through the carrier is a bad idea, and sticking with Verizon is a bad idea if you want custom ROM support long term.

      If you are on T-Mobile or AT&T, things are better, but it's still hard to find good custom ROMs for most phones that anybody wants.

      Many of the reports are going to be outdated. As they rely on community support for reports and many will jump ship the second X favorite feature doesn't work. That being said some may actually be accurate. The easiest thing to do is to go with what seems to be actively worked on by the devs. (Check their commit logs.) Or better, just ask what the devs of your favorite ROM what device they think is best / most functional with their ROM.

      But...custom ROMs aren't as useful as they used to be. Android has gotten a lot better, privacy-wise, and there are a variety of VPN-based ad-blocker/firewall apps. You can do just about everything you would've previously needed "root" for with something like AdGuard, and the default privacy controls in newer versions of Android.

      Those VPN apps are the absolute worst thing you could possibly use if your goal is privacy. They literally allow, by design, the collection of data you want to be private by the VPN operator. Don't use them. Heck many of them have you pay for the privilege of the data being collected. It's a scam. Don't fall for it. Worse, it creates a single big blip on the radar for The Five Eyes to target and compromise a lot of people. A blip that The Five Eyes know are people using in an attempt to hide what they are doing. The only safe VPN is the one you set up and run yourself. Again, Third party VPN apps are not safe. Do NOT use them with sensitive data or browsing habits.

      Android has gotten somewhat better, but there are plenty of reasons to still use custom ROMs, everything from lack of continued support from the manufacturer and removing artificial restrictions on device usage, to bypassing some of Google's non-sense like all of the non-dismiss-able "warnings" that appear when you use a custom TLS CA or using an SD card like a normal person would expect. Yes, there is still superior privacy protections only fully effective with root, and there is always the feeling of ownership. Knowing that you and only you hold the last say in what your device does and does not do. Which is important given the current laws and contract agreements which more or less make you fully liable for whatever the thing does regardless of your ability / authority to stop it or not.

    3. Re:It's getting too hard to bother with by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Android has gotten a lot better, privacy-wise

      ROTFLMAO

      You can do just about everything you would've previously needed "root" for with something like AdGuard, and the default privacy controls in newer versions of Android.

      Spoofing your location, contacts, accounts or anything else that you would otherwise need to grant access to, because Generic Flashlight App #387 refuses to run when you block those permissions?
      Spoofing any one of the zillion identifiers that privacy guard doesn't allow you to block?
      Spoofing mac address so that free public wifi/airport hotspots can't track you?
      Spoofing your location in a fine-tunable way, so that Waze knows roughly where you are (for functionality) but can't track you to the nearest meter?
      Native, seamlessly integrated recording of phone calls (like in LineageOS)?
      Being able to browse the entirity of your own damn filesystem outside local storage?
      Ditching Google Play Services, because they do everything they can to subvert your privacy hardening efforts, but still being able to use Maps and Play Store (thanks to MicroG)
      Running a custom version of youtube that allows videos to play in the background (for the sheeple, this is a premium 'Red' feature)
      Steganographic disk encryption, if that matters to you?

    4. Re:It's getting too hard to bother with by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buy phones that operate on Google FI. Bam, guaranteed to be able to run on all the major carriers in the US.

    5. Re:It's getting too hard to bother with by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      If you are on T-Mobile or AT&T, things are better

      Yes with T-Mobile; not so with AT&T.

    6. Re:It's getting too hard to bother with by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would strongly prefer being raped than using a Google device. I do not understand why we did fight against Nazi Germany, Soviet Union, and Communist China only to give up and bend over for the cloud providers.

      Humans are horrible. We deserve the worst as long as we can not stand up for some simple principles.

      I believe USA is getting close to Iran, Russia, and China in freedom, democracy, and privacy.

      Open Source do give some hope for humanity.

  29. Phones by ledow · · Score: 1

    I don't do the phone thing. I have a phone, it works, I'm happy. And "it works" includes things like SSH + port-forwarding apps to stream live TV from my tvheadend server over the Internet, so it's not like I'm just tapping out texts and nothing else. I have 10 apps just for devices / VPN etc. in work, it's my satnav for all of Europe (CoPilot), etc. etc.

    So I have an S5 Mini, because my S4 Mini got gummed up over the years as I updated and because you can't probably tell the official version of Android to JUST FECKING SAVE EVERYTHING ON SD, I got tired of moving apps only for them to be moved back to the tiny internal storage every time they update.

    Anyway, the S5 Mini still has the same problems, just slightly less often because the internal storage isn't quite so pathetic. But I stick with them because they have IR-blasters built in that are supported by apps I have, to turn on my kit when I'm in work/at home.

    I relegated the S4 to just be a "remote control / TV" at home (handy to watch the TV on the phone in the kitchen while I'm washing up, etc.). One day it went a bit funny and it was clear that it wasn't going to recover and needed reinstallation.

    So I picked up LineageOS at that point, and flashed it. And, feck. If the phone isn't twice as fast and slick as it's ever been, without half the bundled apps, just works and does some things even better than the S5 Mini with the "official" OS. It's actually now a BETTER phone than the S5 Mini because of the OS alone.

    Sadly, the S5 Mini doesn't have a proper supported LineageOS or that would go too (if it does crash-and-burn, it will definitely get the LineageOS treatment).

    Everything past those things doesn't interest me. They all lose ports and functionality, removeable/replaceable parts, cost a bomb and can't be LineageOS'd for the most part. My next phone will have to be a research project, and only if/when the S5 Mini that gets day-to-day use dies and can't be LineageOS'd properly.

    I don't understand what happened to the smartphone industry. I just want a modern phone. I will pay extra on the price to get rid of the standard manufacturer apps etc. permanently. I will pay extra for those "legacy" ports that eat up less room that any of the multi-camera, curved-screen, display-notch shite that they put out now.

    Likely my next "phone" won't be a phone. It'll be a mini-clamshell tablet/PC. For the price of a smartphone, you can get a full Windows Intel PC, with replaceable batteries, proper keyboard and joystick, somewhat resembling a Nintendo DS. It could run Steam, ffs. The call functionality is relatively minor to me at that point. The 4G/5G will mean a million times more. I'd happily buy a "phone" which doesn't have voice calling, in fact. So long as I can do WhatsApp (i.e. it has a phone number), I'm happy.

    Phones overboarded on the useless features where a decent OS install could have doubled their speed and battery life. They focused on all the shite I don't want and removed all the stuff I do. They became huge, fragile and hard to repair. My S4 Mini has been down three flights of stairs to my knowledge. There's barely a scratch on it.

    Given a clamshell PC-like device, with 2 or more SIM slots (eSIMs even better if they take off) and a replaceable battery. I'll pay literally TWICE what I'll be prepared to pay for even the top of the line phone (P.S. Obviously I would not pay what *they* want me to pay for a top of the line phone).

    Phones turned themselves into multipurpose devices in a race to the bottom, then priced themselves as if there were no other devices in the world capable of doing those things. Meanwhile, I could pick up something that does more, costs less, works better, and would be something that other people probably would be more interested in than "Oh, you have the new phone that everyone else bought"...

  30. Best tablet with or can run a stock ROM? by SB5407 · · Score: 1

    I'm looking for a tablet for my father who is hard-of-hearing. He would greatly benefit from Google's new live transcription app. What tablet would you get for between $100 and $200 that comes with a ROM that is or can run a ROM that is stock like what Google shipped Nexus 7 tablet with?

  31. Custom ROMs come in two flavors by SafeMode · · Score: 1

    There is compiled ROMs where everything but the closed source hardware libraries are compiled from source.. ( these are what mostly died)

    And there are kangs, that just repackage the stock rom with less or more/different stuff.

    Even if you go with a compiled rom, it won't work correctly without almost all of the stock rom binaries and libraries included.

    So the ideal of a custom rom devoid of backdoors and unknown crud has long been dead. The best you can hope for is being able to replace the apk's and framework of Android and maybe a custom outdated kernel. That's why most developers have moved on. Aosp is a crippled useless mess that has no hope of fully replacing stock ROMs for anyone except those that don't care about the multiple things that will not work on whatever hardware they're using it on.

  32. MANY Samsungs can be a PITA. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heh. Bought a Samsung S4 (AT&T still shows the back cover and that insipid tone when booting) not tied to carrier even though it had their bloatware. Had to use one of those rooting programs to get root. Ran that way for a few years. Recently was going to change to a different ROM from stock as well as a later version of android (6.0). The usual wipe everything and load alternative ROM. Went quickly downhill. First I though I had changed the bootloader, but apparently it was stock because the original doesn't load alternative ROMS, only those signed by Samsung. The wipe lost root, brought back everything including KNOX*, and of course Google's restore isn't smart enough to do anything but a complete restore. That includes apps you've tried and deleted over the years. Lesson? Most likely not ever buying Samsung. And never AT$T. As for Google not much I can do about them, and Apple brings it's own set of problems.

    *Even with stock ROM Kies couldn't see the phone.

    1. Re: MANY Samsungs can be a PITA. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You unfortunately have the at&t S4, which has tightly locked bootloader. The T-Mobile S4 (and most other variants) are unlocked and still getting new custom ROMs, I've been on Pie LineageOS for several weeks now

  33. Project treble!! by Severus+Snape · · Score: 1

    Custom ROMs are still a thing, lots of us still love them. We just don't bitch and moan in public anymore because of treble.

  34. Re:Is it even really worth the effort for most fol by Leslie43 · · Score: 1

    I remember playing with custom ROMs like Cyanogen, years ago, with my Samsung Galaxy phone on Sprint's network.

    Well there's most of your problem right there...

    Sprint wrote the laws regarding carrier change and left loopholes they had planned ahead for. They do everything they legally can to lock you into them as a carrier. Of course they do , you say, but no, this goes beyond what other carriers do. And then there is their prepaid divisions which are somehow even worse. The first rule of phone modding should be to get rid of Sprint if you want to do anything with your phone.

    If you want to play, you will usually want a T-mobile phone or unlocked phone straight from the manufacturer, both of which you tend to pay a little more for (always research before you buy though, even if on the Lineage list!). AT&T and Verizon is hit or miss and AT&T has even been known to lock the bootloader later with an update (they did this with the S4). You also will want to avoid Samsung, they are difficult and if you mess up they hard brick with no fix. HTC will give you the codes to unlock the bootloader and they have a good recovery system if you mess it up. LG is hit or miss but generally good, though some models are a serious hassle. I haven't worked with Motorola..

  35. It's not about new features by DogDude · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's about privacy. If you're fine with Google knowing everything there is to know about you, then you're right, there's probably no chance. Call me nuts, but I don't want to give Google (or Apple) all of the details of my life.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
    1. Re:It's not about new features by postbigbang · · Score: 3, Informative

      Google is not the only one that tracks you.

      Your carrier tracks you. Sorry. They do it in different ways, but your location-based services are all ready and waiting for you.

      Your DNS tracks you. Maybe you use CloudFront 1.1.1. but ask CloudFront what THEY do with the data. If you use Google's DNS, you're insane if you don't think they're tracking you.

      Your IP address is going to come from somewhere, bubba. Hmmm. Wonder what CIDR bock that address comes from. Oh.

      It's really tough to not be "uniqued". True anonymity sadly has to consider all of the most paranoid possibilities. Why? Who has more computing power, you or them?

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    2. Re:It's not about new features by Voyager529 · · Score: 1

      Google is not the only one that tracks you.

      Duh. They are, however, the most prolific corporation in the mobile space whose business model is primarily defined by that tracking.

      Your carrier tracks you. Sorry. They do it in different ways, but your location-based services are all ready and waiting for you.

      That's one of the things rooting allows a person to address. Ask any app on my phone what my location is, and I'm at the north pole, all day, every day. Now yes, the carriers can use triangulation and a few other tricks, but there's a big difference between "knowing where I am within a square mile" and "knowing where I am within 15 feet".

      Your DNS tracks you. Maybe you use CloudFront 1.1.1. but ask CloudFront what THEY do with the data. If you use Google's DNS, you're insane if you don't think they're tracking you.

      There's also Level 3.
      There's also FoolDNS.
      There's also Quad9.
      There's also Route53.

      More to the point, the key is distribution. If Cloudfront has my DNS queries in isolation, that's different than them having other sources of data with which to build a profile.

      Your IP address is going to come from somewhere, bubba. Hmmm. Wonder what CIDR bock that address comes from. Oh.

      My Carrier, who's probably got CGN going on?

      It's really tough to not be "uniqued".

      This is true, but it sounds like you're arguing that since it's impossible to avoid any profiling, it's fruitless to do anything to attempt to mitigate it, even a little bit. I'm sure, at the end of the day, Google is storing all of my search queries. Maybe they've got me figured out enough that they can tie most of them together, rather than having a shadow profile or two on me. However, that doesn't mean I'm going to log into Chrome and explicitly request that they save my entire search history. Maybe they take my call logs and maybe they don't, but I'm not explicitly giving them all of my contacts.

      True anonymity sadly has to consider all of the most paranoid possibilities. Why? Who has more computing power, you or them?

      Them. Maybe, despite all of my efforts, they're still getting 98% of the data they're after anyway. I cannot change that. The remaining two percent, however, shows intent. It shows resistance. Maybe it is indeed a pointless fight, but that two percent remains mine, and any data that I have and Google doesn't is still a victory.

    3. Re:It's not about new features by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      You're putting words in my mouth. I'm not saying you shouldn't deny anyone enriching themselves from your communications.

      But there are several flaws in your thinking. Your carrier knows pretty much where you are in an urban locale, and in sparce cells, can figure out where you are pretty simply. No rocket science.

      Your DNS rats your IP address, and reverse. The persistence of that DNS from the cloud through your carrier pigeon holes you. Case 1, you've had the DNS for a long time and don't shut off your phone and this is actually better if you roam around because it diffuses the origin possibility, obfuscating it. Case 2, if you're stationary and have several persistent GET/POSTs to a site, you become easier to fix.

      Yes, there are plentiful logs. Your voice is very likely sieved through various three letter agencies on all calls. If you use an encrypted app, that's a flag. Skype helps, but Microsoft will give it up for a warrant. Real true anonymity is haltingly difficult. Burner phones age quickly.... as any government official.

      And I'm with you on the resist part. Noise is your best helper.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    4. Re:It's not about new features by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      It's about privacy. If you're fine with Google knowing everything there is to know about you, then you're right, there's probably no chance.

      If your custom ROM has the Play Store added then Google knows everything there is to know about you anyway. If you're happy without the Play store then you in no way need to root to get these privacy protections, simply don't attach your phone to a Google account.

    5. Re:It's not about new features by DogDude · · Score: 1

      I know my carrier tracks me. So then, you're saying I should give up and let everybody else track me, too?

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    6. Re:It's not about new features by DogDude · · Score: 1

      I haven't ready anything that says that Android's source has been reviewed, and there aren't any Google hooks in it. I'd be very, very surprised if there weren't. Do you have anything that shows that Android is clean of Google tracking, outside of the "Play" store?

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    7. Re: It's not about new features by n0nsensical · · Score: 1

      That's why I just run my own damn DNS server! It's really very easy to do and has zero performance requirements. Just gotta lock it down a little bit to avoid abuse by spammer-type pieces of shit. You can even run one locally if you wish but mine is on a RbPi. After all if I'm querying your DNS server it should come as no surprise that I will be accessing your site so it gives nothing away unless your ISP is inspecting your DNS packets too but there should be some secure DNS standard floating around that nobody uses.

    8. Re: It's not about new features by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      Very good. I'm not sure what to use when I'm mobile with my phone. Currently, it's Cloudfront 1.1.1.1 but I'm wondering if there's a better way on an android phone.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    9. Re: It's not about new features by n0nsensical · · Score: 1

      Well if you don't mind punching a hole in port 23 of your home network gateway you can use the same one on your RbPi! Can do the same thing on an AWS nano or micro instance too if you don't have a RbPi or other home server handy or just don't want it running on your home network. Just need to figure out the appropriate IP ranges that are assignable by your mobile provider and enable recursive lookups in the DNS server config for those ranges, or block incoming traffic from anywhere else on the gateway firewall. BIND is fairly ancient and arcane; I use it anyway just because of the devil you know and known knowns and unknown unknowns and all that but there may be something better out there just for doing lookups if that's all you need. I'm hosting my own domains' DNS records anyway so I'm going to have to deal with the complexity one way or another. Or you can just allow recursive lookups from anywhere, but as with any "public service" it's only a matter of time before a bunch of idiots port scan your IP and figure out how to abuse your resources for profit so that's not a very practical long-term solution...

    10. Re: It's not about new features by n0nsensical · · Score: 1

      Oops, missing a few intended paragraph breaks there, sorry.....

    11. Re:It's not about new features by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I haven't ready anything that says that Android's source has been reviewed, and there aren't any Google hooks in it.

      You don't need a source review to ensure something isn't talking to Google.

      Do you have anything that shows that Android is clean of Google tracking

      Do you have the ability to come up with a less tinfoil hat: "You need to prove my negative in order to be right" argument? We're all out to get you man.

  36. When Carrier or OEM stops releasing updates.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Security, compatibility, personal finances, environment, and basic relevance come into the picture pretty quickly here.

    Bloatware removal, fine-grained control, and personal selection of features also appeals to some. (what *DOES* the FaceBook app collect? oh, you disabled it? After the first-run wizard..? Bias showing from somebody never on the platform lol)

    Not to mention a "perfectly good device" that is 2 years old, where the OEM and/or Carrier wishes for you to purchase a new one. (i.e. yes, you don't need to purchase a new phone, but you're also not subsidizing a phone either - so, often you can shift to a BYOD plan, which is less pricey)

    I live in Canada, FWIW.

  37. What 185 devices? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lineage still makes regular builds for phones that are years old now. Breathing new life into that 3-5 year old android phone you have that isn't getting updates from the carrier or OEM any longer. It is quite possible that this list is all older devices that have unlocked or easily unlocked boot loaders. I honestly haven't looked at the list to see how many phones from the last year or two are on the list. It also usually takes about a year or so for 3rd party ROM makers to make a ROM that is stable enough to be used as a daily driver, so you are better off sticking with phones that are 2+ years old if you are going the 3rd party ROM route. LineageOS doesn't distribute ROMs on their official site that are not at least stable enough to be used as a daily driver. If you check a forum like xda-developers.com you'll find many more unofficial ROMs for both officially supported devices and unsupported devices.These ROMs will generally stay in an unofficial state untill they are stable

    I myself still rock a Note4 on a current lineage OS build. There is nothing currently on the market that I would want to buy. They all have sealed in batteries, notches, disappearing headphone jacks, non-flat screens that you cant apply a proper glass screen protector to. The processor in a flagship like the Note4 is still plenty fast for today's applications.

  38. Nexus, Pixel by emil · · Score: 1

    I'm using a Nexus 6 on Verizon with the MicroG reroll of LineageOS. Nice phone, not missing Google.

  39. What does it look like? by ntropia · · Score: 1

    I'm a big fan of unlocked phones myself, and over the years, I've looked at the Lineage project more than once. If you google the official website, you will land on a fancy and modern page with all whistles and bells about the core values and the mission of the organization, and the links to download their software.

    I did it again, today, and the outcome is still the same: I I have no idea about how this custom OS looks like, what offers, and what are the limitations (if any).
    The About link shows a page with the vocabulary definition of the name of the OS, and a not-so-obvious link to Wikipedia.
    I'm sure there are a bunch of smart people out there that are willing and able to send me a link full of screenshots and the features of LineageOS, but the fact that a reasonably tech savvy person can't find any of these from their own website (and not using Google, thank you) is disappointing, to say the least.
    I'm thankful for all the volunteers that spend time supporting a large number of phones, etc... but I'm still disappointed.

  40. Yes, of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've increased the battery life on my Samsung A520W(Canadian model) by a couple hours and obtained features that were simply not present in the stock firmware (Like FM Radio, even with Radio apps it didn't work.. yet it does with a custom firmware... Yay canadian Telecom screwing customers over in order to sell expensive data plans to stream radio over the internet instead of Freely).
    Custom firmwares give us that extra customization that stock firmwares simply do not. They also increase the life of older devices by updating them to newer Android versions that are not officially supported by the manufacturer (why would they push an update if they can make you buy their newest phone after all)

  41. Of course by Gabest · · Score: 1

    Are you seriously gonna use your newly bought Chinese phone with the manufacturer's ROM? First thing is to install some other from xda. I'm sorry if you only buy 500+ dollar phones, good for you.

  42. LineageOS works, but how safe is it? by gordonb · · Score: 1

    I used LineageOS on my Nexus 7- until it died. I currently use it on my Galaxy Note 3 - rooted, running Lineage 14.1, and working well on a Verizon MVNO. And, it still has one of the best screens out there. It has allowed me to use phones for years after they were made obsolete by the manufacturer. When the Note 3 dies, I’ll buy some other cheap 2-3 year old phone, throw on Lineage or some other ROM, slap in a prepaid SIM, and move on, spending a fraction of what others pay. (Currently on RedPocket @ $99.00 a year.)

    I consider all phones potentially hacked, even stock. I do not do any banking or use any financial apps, like Fidelity, etc. There’s just no way I can audit the ROMs - and, for that matter, any of the apps on the phone. I only do any financial stuff on my desktop at home on a secure WiFi. Maybe, probably, that’s a leap of faith as well.

    1. Re: LineageOS works, but how safe is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You know the LineageOS source trees are all on GitHub, right? Audit all you like or build your own. Feel free.

  43. WTF is the submitter talking about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course they are still a thing. I have LineageOS on my Samsung Pro tablets, my Moto G4, my Moto G6, my OPO, and who knows how many other devices I've been through with LOS.

    Installing it was trivially easy on all of them.

    Just because the submitter looked at "Step 1) Unlock Bootloader" and said "lolwut" doesn't mean custom ROMs aren't a thing not that "nobody can install them."

    Don't be stupid.

  44. Locked because... by freeschwag · · Score: 1

    AndroidPay, Samsung Pay, GooglePay et all... follow the money. Root breaks the money apps. Breaks PokemonGo too. :(

    --
    Tweet, tweet, all id10t's out of the gene pool, open swim is over.
    1. Re: Locked because... by freeschwag · · Score: 1

      And I really miss Cyanogenmod. I still have an S4 that works but....

      --
      Tweet, tweet, all id10t's out of the gene pool, open swim is over.
  45. Still a thing if you have a broken phone by trawg · · Score: 2

    My Nexus 5X recently died - just rebooted in the middle of using it and it didn't come back up, just got stuck in a boot loop. My dad had the exact same thing happen to his phone (also a 5X) a couple months back; I went through the usual process to try to fix it and discovered that there's a fix that basically involved an unofficial ROM, along with an effort to try to get fix legitimised by Google by signing the relevant files.

    It seems that the 5X is just busted by design as many many users had this problem. I haven't been able to get mine to boot far enough to try the fix (seems it's better as a immunisation method).

    I was a bit nervous about putting random software I downloaded from the Internet on at such a low level, although it's all open source and seems to be highly recommended by XDA at least.

    But when this sort of customisation is the only way to keep your phone alive when it dies hard after only two years - you'd better believe they're still a thing. Here's to the hacker types that keep our devices alive.

    1. Re:Still a thing if you have a broken phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need to load an image that has some of the CPU cores disabled, then it might work for another 1-2 weeks. Had the same problem... sold it in the end. Not worth it.

    2. Re:Still a thing if you have a broken phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had exactly the same problem with my Nexus 5X. I found a workaround: stick it in the fridge for a few hours. After that, I was able to boot it, and it stayed running for a couple of hours - long enough to retrieve my data - before it went back into the bootloop.

      (Presumably the problem is a physical break between two conductors, and cooling it causes the device to shrink and bring the conductors back into contact.)

    3. Re:Still a thing if you have a broken phone by Thad+Boyd · · Score: 1

      I had a similar problem with my Nexus 5 (not X) recently, but it turned out to be a hardware problem: apparently the power button wears out and shorts, so that it registers as always being held down.

      I got it fixed for $45 at a local repair shop. (I'm confident enough in my own repair skills that I popped it open and cleaned it with compressed air and alcohol, but when that didn't work and it was clear that it would need some microsoldering work, I decided it was time to call a professional.)

      I guess that's not really directly related, but support for custom ROMs is part of why I'm sticking with such an old phone.

    4. Re:Still a thing if you have a broken phone by CheeseyDJ · · Score: 1

      If you bought it from Amazon, try returning it. My Nexus 5x died about six months ago after owning it for 18 months, and Amazon gave me a full refund (after some discussion about it being a known unresolved design fault, so I didn't want a repair). I then took the money and bought a Pixel XL, and it effectively cost me nothing.

  46. No need anymore by pizzamannetje · · Score: 1

    For me, the need to flash custom roms has disappeared. 1. New versions of Android no longer have must-have features. 2. Longer security updates. 3. Less sluggish shells. 4. No replaceable batteries, so phone hardware has a shorter lifespan. That doesn't weigh up to the time and risks. I remember i stopped flashing because custom roms caused lesser quality camera pictures.

  47. Re:Is it even really worth the effort for most fol by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    I see it as the reverse. It wasn't the effort required to root that drove me away from rooting, but rather the reward for doing so. Back in the day rooting and installing a custom rom was absolutely essential. It was required for basic privacy control, it was required to mitigate horribly slow systems, it was required to unlock new features when vendors refused to roll out updates.

    These days. ... I don't see the point.

  48. How are they not a thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Why is LineageOS making builds for 185 devices if no one can use them"

    Well, I'm using one of them. Got my phone (Samsung Galaxy S5) second-hand from Amazon and I've never had a problem getting CyanogenMod/LineageOS on to it.

    I don't know what kind of godawful telecoms corporation-ruled shithole the story poster is living in where phones are allowed to be locked down like that, but this is not a problem in the civilised world.

  49. yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You go have to ask what phones can still be unlocked.

    Select Motorola phones can be unlocked by the Motorola website. Be careful on which ones you get.

    Certain other phones can be unlocked after being rooted, but that might take time to find a 'sploit to pop root.

    Some phones you have to flash very certain vulnerable versions to be able to exploit and unlock the bootloader.

    Check xda-developers.com for more details

  50. Why Lineage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you really want to say goodbye to the Big Five don't use Lineage, use /e/. (Stupid unsearchable name, I know. Almost as silly as /.:)

  51. Desktops won the battle. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The battle for the desktop was lost years ago. Why do you think hardware people have pushed to instead switch to a new netbook, chromebook, or other looks-like-a-laptop-but-isnt device? It's worked too. I work on few laptops anymore. The ones that I do get, come from my upper-middle class customers. The lower income types bring me things they call laptops, but are actually stuff like Samsung Gear books that thier cell carrier subsidized for only $99/mo extra on thier bill. What a deal amirite?

    Also, don't forget that we almost did get locked bootloaders. Remember all the fighting about UEFI and TPM? The hardware did eventually get installed into our motherboards anyway, but we didn't let them lock our shit down with it. I do not expect that to continue so enjoy your freedom while it lasts.

  52. Custom Rom all the way! by OppMan29 · · Score: 1

    most flagship phones have a custom rom, you have to spend time to install it ,,, but once you have root you never want to go back