Slashdot Mirror


'90s-Style 'Captain Marvel' Website Will Have You Nostalgic for Dial-Up (movieweb.com)

An anonymous reader quotes MovieWeb: The official Captain Marvel website is a blast from the past... Marvel Studios is preparing its final promotional push for the project. This includes TV spots, various forms of merchandise, posters, and in this case, a perfect retro website, tailor made to take us all back to a time when the internet was a whole lot simpler.

Instead of flashy high resolution images, we are treated to pixelated versions, which perfectly reimagines the 1990s websites. There's a lot of Word art, a ticker to count how many unique views that the site gets, a guest book, and even a game that lets fans spot the Kree. Instead of the trailers coming through YouTube, they are played using the "Kree Player," which is take on the old Real Player.

MovieWeb writes that the site "also gives younger Marvel Cinematic Universe fans a chance to see what the internet looked like back in the day...."

And though the movie's slogan is "Higher, further, faster," they argue that "The only thing that could have made the Captain Marvel site even better is slow page loading, just to give it a real touch of what it was like surfing the net in the dark ages."

26 of 137 comments (clear)

  1. Not exactly 90's-style by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That many animated GIFs, at those sizes, are hard even for my old Core 2 Duo CPU with 16GB of RAM. I can't imagine a computer from the 1990's able to display that webpage.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
    1. Re:Not exactly 90's-style by ChromeAeonuim · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And I can't even see it without allowing scripts. I use NoScript and I see nothing, and since I don't feel like allowing whatever script is apparently necessary to display basic HTML, I'm not going to see anything either. Scripts are not needed to display basic text and images. Calling this site '90's style' is like calling a bacon falafel burger with cheese 'authentic Jewish food'.

      I hope this is an ad, because if it isn't, that means people are actually impressed by this.

    2. Re:Not exactly 90's-style by jellomizer · · Score: 2

      We were more patient then. Loading a page back in the 1990's a 1 minute wait for the page to load was considered acceptable. Also we had screens closer to 640x480 so such gif files were smaller,

      This was a 90's style page, but not for a professional site, it looks like a armature built geocities page. The professional pages back then, were actually much better made. They were mostly styled off magazines, and news print.

      Some of the biggest issues, was the lack of Anti-Aliasing text, speed of downloading,

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    3. Re:Not exactly 90's-style by Spazmania · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You beat me to to. This is a stylized "retro" web site not a '90s style web site.

      --
      Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
    4. Re:Not exactly 90's-style by kackle · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Bah; I usually try to use my 6-year old Opera 12 web browser on a site first (I don't like change), and with it, the page wouldn't load at all.

    5. Re:Not exactly 90's-style by sg_oneill · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Over heavy Javascript wasn't that uncommon back then, although sometimes it was vbScript (Which i rarely saw since Netscape Navigator didnt support it)..

      The major things that jump out to me.
      1) The JS was almost always inline (I still actually do this. Honestly sometimes throwing the glue script at the end just makes more sense).
      2) Div layouts. Back then Table layouts where the norm. Partly because after netscape introduced Div layers, the implementation was confusing as hell and inconsistent across versions
      3) CSS. CSS was rare as hell. Things mostly used inline attributes.
      4) Wheres the Marquee and Blink tags!!?
      5) Needs more jeffk!!!!!!111one

      The gif stuff actually was pretty common, and generally irritating as hell, and lead to some stupidly long load times. You kind of developed a habit of learning to read a page as it loaded then.

      But yeah, ,the design, rings pretty true to me. I'm getting a giggle out of it, so mission accomplished.

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    6. Re:Not exactly 90's-style by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 5, Informative

      More GIFs? Probably. But in those days, animated GIFs were much smaller in both dimensions and filesize and only had a few frames.

      Let's check what's on that website:
      19 javascript files, for a total of 1,058,266 bytes (yes, one fucking megabyte of javascript on a 1990's-style website... are you kidding me?)
      17 GIF images, for a total of 1,149,430 bytes (more than one fucking megabyte)
      12 PNG images, for a total of 183,245 bytes (quite normal, although at the time GIF was much more popular even for non-animated images)
      6 JPEG images, for a total of 113,833 bytes (again, quite normal)
      We won't talk about the 50KB HTML and the 26KB CSS files which are required to display the old-style website on a modern browser. A real 1990's web page would probably have more HTML and less CSS.

      Total for everything: 2,795,691 bytes. That's extremely heavy, even for a 2019 website.
      I can't imagine anyone waiting to download that monstrosity in the 1990's.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
  2. Unconvincing by roskakori · · Score: 5, Insightful

    uBlock rejects 14 data collecting nasties. Didn't have those in the mid nineties.

    1. Re:Unconvincing by zzyzyx · · Score: 2

      Despite widespread belief, using Chrome is not the only way to browse the Internet.

  3. It's missing one by ChoGGi · · Score: 5, Funny

    Where's the under construction sign?

  4. Not bad by godrik · · Score: 2

    The style looks about right! The guest book was a nice touch. Though I don't remember guestbook needing "sign in", they usually just let you post whatever, sometime required manual moderation.

    But, that's a lot of javascript for the 90's. And that "one page" format is very modern. All these things would have been on different pages.

    Where is the "webring" banner?

  5. Requires Javascript by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Requires Javascript without any sort of backup to a non-script version, which is certainly not what a 90s web page would have done (mostly). Further, the page clocks in at 8.8MB. That means at 5KB/s (which btw, is incredibly generous since that didn't come out and be generally available until the late of the 90s), it'd take 30 minutes to fully load. Aka, utter shit I'd avoid.

    So, I guess if the point was the "nostalgia" of movie studios who don't get the internet, then they really nailed it.

  6. Imagine being that web designer... by Leslie43 · · Score: 2

    and having to list that on your body of work.

    Or the guy who had to justify paying for that.

    1. Re:Imagine being that web designer... by Lanthanide · · Score: 2

      Why would you 'have to list [it] on your body of work"?

      You know that a portfolio is a catalogue of content that you're proud to show off, right, and it's entirely up to you what goes into the portfolio?

  7. old lady punching by TheRealQuestor · · Score: 3

    not sure why but it's kind of satisfying to keep punching the old lady [kree] that keeps poping up all over the page. And the little Stan Lee at the very bottom of the page is kind of sad but a nice little tribute none the less.

  8. No we did not make websites like that in the 1990s by Solandri · · Score: 3, Interesting

    For the Millennials among you, no that's not what websites looked like in the 1990s. At least not the functional ones. That Marvel site uses just about every cliched bad web site feature that was offered on GeoCities. That was a site where you could make your own web page without buying a domain, paying for hosting, or knowing how to code HTML Sort of a predecessor to Facebook and MySpace. It was designed to be easy to use, meaning that the clueless masses flocked to it and generated horrific websites which were gaudy, tasteless, and difficult to navigate. (Thankfully they've spared you blinking text, and a background which didn't scroll with the page leaving you confused if you were actually scrolling.)

    Try Philip Greenspun's website for an inkling of what a functional site looked like in the 1990s. He was the original creator of photo.net, and his home site still uses the old layout and HTML coding used for the original photo.net. This was before drop-down menus, multiple column support, client-side scripting, in-line video, and (thankfully) in-line audio. Most people were on dialup so if you didn't want people to immediately leave your site, you used a small low-res version of any pictures which linked to a high-res version. You might notice the pages load a helluva lot faster than any modern site.

  9. Nice try, but not 90's by Ecuador · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Eh, apart from the fact that it uses js, clicking on links scrolls you "down" to a different background and doesn't leave any "back" navigation. Definitely not 90's style behavior, web designers nowadays don't know how to make something basic & old school even if they tried...

    --
    Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
  10. Re:Retarded. by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Nothing new. If you looked at retro-80's movies like Hot Tub Time Machine you would think everybody and their mother back then went around wearing all day-glo outfits with pop-star hair. In reality, most people just wore jeans and a t-shirt, same as today. And unless you were a woman or you were in the band Poison, your hair probably wasn't poofed-up too much.

    Ironically, I remember my dad laughing at the version of the 1950's shown in Back to the Future (he was particularly amused at Biff's buddy who went around wearing paper 3D glasses for no apparent reason other than "3D movies were big back then, right?"). Now I see the same thing in the way movies portray the 1980's.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  11. Ugh! by imperious_rex · · Score: 2

    Back in the 90s, many amateur web sites (I'm looking at YOU GeoCities) really were garish and suffered from their creators' poor sense of design and taste. But sites by professional web design studios looked pretty good (just more primitive JavaScript and almost no CSS at the time) despite severely optimizing their pages for 56K dial-up speeds, and were far better looking than this gaudy Captain Marvel parody of 90s web design sensibility. No 90s pro web designer in their right mind would have abused animated GIFs and fonts (Comic Sans??? WTF?) like this. Using just strictly HTML 3.0 and a sprinkle of basic JavaScript for mouse rollover effects, any web designer could make a tasteful Captain Marvel home page that would be well under 500K in total size.

  12. For the real '90s, check out the Space Jam site! by ToTheStars · · Score: 5, Informative

    Others have remarked on the use of Javascript, YouTube videos, and other technology that didn't exist or wasn't widely used until after then '90s, but the original Space Jam movie website is still up in its 1996 glory: https://www.warnerbros.com/arc...

  13. Be that as it may..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...it is still funny.

    It made me laugh. Did it make you laugh too? Or are you only capable of negativity?

  14. Re:So fast by Barny · · Score: 2

    I know! It loaded instantly for me. Shame that it absolutely requires scripting to do anything, but the blank page loaded instantly!

    --
    ...
    /me sighs
  15. Re:Retarded. by goose-incarnated · · Score: 2

    onically, I remember my dad laughing at the version of the 1950's shown in Back to the Future (he was particularly amused at Biff's buddy who went around wearing paper 3D glasses for no apparent reason other than "3D movies were big back then, right?"). Now I see the same thing in the way movies portray the 1980's.

    They didn't make their movie to show people what the 50s was like, they made their movie to pretend to be in the 50s, hence they had to conform to what the viewers thought the 50s looked like.

    --
    I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
  16. Re:No we did not make websites like that in the 19 by qubezz · · Score: 2

    Key obsolete features were abused early on, defining the 90's web. A web page divided into frames. Server-side image maps. CGI-BIN. Tables with the 3D borders. The ubiquitous single banner at the top of the page.

    The biggest differentiator when you go back to handwritten HTML pages from before the dotcom bubble popped - ones you would have seen using Mosaic on Windows 3.11 even - they were formatted for 640x480 screens and are relatively tiny today.

    https://www.cnn.com/videos/tv/...

  17. Shameless plug - this is a 90's site by bb_matt · · Score: 2

    So, one of my first websites survives on the quake wiki & whilst it wasn't exactly popular, the code and the graphics reflects what sites were like back then.

    https://www.quakewiki.net/arch...

    This marvel site is just a poor reflection of the reality, as the code behind it, the reliance on javascript, the sheer weight of all the assets, is totally out of place with the era.

  18. Re:No we did not make websites like that in the 19 by thegarbz · · Score: 2

    For something more relevant, here's a movie site still up from 1996: https://www.spacejam.com/archi...