If you have the Home version of Windows 10, then you cannot permanently postpone updates. Eventually it WILL update and interrupt whatever you're doing.
Unfortunately we can't go back through history and give every single human who ever lived privilege and time to see what they're capable of.
So we can only assess those who have made prominent contributions. There are many others who had privilege and time and still didn't contribute what Newton did, so it's still fair to call him a genius.
The idea, that was not communicated clearly, is that the hash would be transmitted over the encrypted channel, thus extending trust to the object served outside of that trusted umbrella.
Google are doing it in a standards based way though, Microsoft didn't.
If you visited the site using another browser, you can still do the download. Once the website admin jumps through Google's hoops, the download will still work correctly in any other browser that properly follows the HTTPS standard.
I have 2 cats. Both of them respond to their own names. In fact the dumber one responds to both names - I think she's just greedy.
The older male one is definitely smarter than the younger female one. He can understand when I point to something, to look at what I am pointing at rather than the tip of my finger - apparently this is something that about 30% of cats can do. The younger female cat seems pretty ambivalent on this gesture - sometimes she will stare intently at my finger, other times she appears to look at what I am pointing at.
The older male is very neurotic in general and appears to remember past (negative) events exceptionally well. The female cat is much more easy going - one time when she was a very young kitten I played with her with a rabbit fur toy and happened to be holding a metal pocket multi tool (like a pocketknife) in my hand which I accidentally dropped and it hit her smack on the head, enough to hurt her and cause her to run away. The next couple of times I played with her with the rabbit fur toy she was visibly apprehensive, because she remembered being hit on the head. Now (2+ years later) I can play with her with that toy and she doesn't hesitate or worry at all, whereas the older neurotic male cat seems to recall every bad experience he has ever had and will sometimes cower when I approach him with my arms outstretched in the wrong way - he remembers past times where I applied flea medicine to the back of his neck which he hated.
You can also regulate things. The regulations can include banning of components or concepts without banning the overall product, as well as putting restrictions on components or concepts without banning the overall product.
So you think it is appropriate for children to be banned from gambling in a casino, but you don't think any restrictions at all need to be considered if children are gambling on phones in a game that uses all of the existing psychology tricks to encourage gambling - and more - to extract money from them.
Hamilton viewed the system as superior to direct popular election. First, he recognized, the "sense of the people should operate in the choice", and would through the election of the electors to the Electoral College. Second, the electors would be:...men most capable of analyzing the qualities adapted to the station and acting under circumstances favorable to deliberation, and to a judicious combination of all the reasons and inducements which were proper to govern their choice.
Such men would be "most likely to have the information and discernment" to make a good choice and to avoid the election of anyone "not in an eminent degree endowed with the requisite qualifications."
Corruption of an electoral process could most likely arise from the desire of "foreign powers to gain an improper ascendant in our councils." To minimize risk of foreign machinations and inducements, the electoral college members would have only a "transient existence" and no elector could be a "senator, representative, or other person holding a place of trust or profit under the United States"; electors would make their choice in a "detached situation", whereas a preexisting body of federal office-holders "might be tampered with beforehand to prostitute their votes".
I have dozens of posts saying the same thing because 90% of the posts in this thread are dopey replies attacking Harry for talking about a problem he has observed because he has some privileges in life, or dismissing Fortnite as being a problem because it's "just like other games" when it isn't.
I'm bringing facts to the debate and I've posted it many times in the hopes that the facts aren't overlooked and that people might learn something, and that we might be able to have a rational discussion instead of stupid thoughtless comments that have predominated so far.
A football game that you spend money on tickets to see happens once or twice a week. You can play fortnite on your phone whenever you want.
Yes, parents are responsible for their children, but also children aren't allowed to go to casinos until they're 18.
Fortnite literally is not different than what casinos are trying to do, it is deliberately designed to make people addicted and spend money. Watch this video to see how insidious it is: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Actually you can't get the full gameplay experience without paying money.
If you don't buy a skin, then your player's appearance randomly changes between matches.
If you don't pay money, then you stop getting rewards once you reach level 62 in a season, you also get FAR fewer rewards over that time - if you pay money, you get at least 1 reward every single level up to 62 and then beyond to 100. If you don't pay money, you get a reward every 2-3 levels up to 62 and then nothing afterwards.
There are challenges that you need to complete any 4 of in order to earn extra experience to level up. You can only complete 3 if you don't pay money.
Because Fortnite is deliberately designed to be addictive in a way that those other games are not. It made $2.4 billion in revenue last year for a "free to play" game. Only WoW managed to come anywhere close to that.
Really you just need people to follow the constitution and its checks and balances.
One of the points of the electoral college was to ensure that the public couldn't elect people who weren't fit to govern. They failed to uphold their constitutional duty after the 2016 election.
When the product that the psychologist designed is available to children under the age of 18 to play on their phone at any time of day, and parents are enabling them to do so, and the psychologist's product is legal, my investment money would go to the psychologist, not the chemist.
Fortnite brought in $2.4 billion in legal revenue last year, for a "free to play" game.
Slashdot Mirror
If you have the Home version of Windows 10, then you cannot permanently postpone updates. Eventually it WILL update and interrupt whatever you're doing.
Unfortunately we can't go back through history and give every single human who ever lived privilege and time to see what they're capable of.
So we can only assess those who have made prominent contributions. There are many others who had privilege and time and still didn't contribute what Newton did, so it's still fair to call him a genius.
*router
The idea, that was not communicated clearly, is that the hash would be transmitted over the encrypted channel, thus extending trust to the object served outside of that trusted umbrella.
Google are doing it in a standards based way though, Microsoft didn't.
If you visited the site using another browser, you can still do the download. Once the website admin jumps through Google's hoops, the download will still work correctly in any other browser that properly follows the HTTPS standard.
What training? Just have a human from the company visit each house once to confirm the spot is acceptable.
Then no more humans are needed ever again.
It wasn't even a proper UBI.
The people who received it had some marginal taxes reduced, not eliminated.
They had some beuracracy for claiming their benefit reduced, not eliminated.
I have 2 cats. Both of them respond to their own names. In fact the dumber one responds to both names - I think she's just greedy.
The older male one is definitely smarter than the younger female one. He can understand when I point to something, to look at what I am pointing at rather than the tip of my finger - apparently this is something that about 30% of cats can do. The younger female cat seems pretty ambivalent on this gesture - sometimes she will stare intently at my finger, other times she appears to look at what I am pointing at.
The older male is very neurotic in general and appears to remember past (negative) events exceptionally well. The female cat is much more easy going - one time when she was a very young kitten I played with her with a rabbit fur toy and happened to be holding a metal pocket multi tool (like a pocketknife) in my hand which I accidentally dropped and it hit her smack on the head, enough to hurt her and cause her to run away. The next couple of times I played with her with the rabbit fur toy she was visibly apprehensive, because she remembered being hit on the head. Now (2+ years later) I can play with her with that toy and she doesn't hesitate or worry at all, whereas the older neurotic male cat seems to recall every bad experience he has ever had and will sometimes cower when I approach him with my arms outstretched in the wrong way - he remembers past times where I applied flea medicine to the back of his neck which he hated.
You can also regulate things. The regulations can include banning of components or concepts without banning the overall product, as well as putting restrictions on components or concepts without banning the overall product.
Oh well, your loss then. I didn't make the video so I have no control over whether it's content is written down or not.
Also the video is actually showing stuff on screen and talking about it. So a written transcript would be far less useful than a video for this topic.
So you think it is appropriate for children to be banned from gambling in a casino, but you don't think any restrictions at all need to be considered if children are gambling on phones in a game that uses all of the existing psychology tricks to encourage gambling - and more - to extract money from them.
Just so we're clear.
The majority of people playing Fortnite are not legal adults, which is the game we are discussing.
Part of the gameplay experience is how you experience it, and how others react to you in the game world.
That does change based on cosmetic items.
I simply said which enterprise I would invest in - the psychologist, not the chemist.
You need more than $5 and ziplock bags to make addictive drugs created by a chemist.
And Alexander Hamilton https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Hamilton viewed the system as superior to direct popular election. First, he recognized, the "sense of the people should operate in the choice", and would through the election of the electors to the Electoral College. Second, the electors would be: ...men most capable of analyzing the qualities adapted to the station and acting under circumstances favorable to deliberation, and to a judicious combination of all the reasons and inducements which were proper to govern their choice.
Such men would be "most likely to have the information and discernment" to make a good choice and to avoid the election of anyone "not in an eminent degree endowed with the requisite qualifications."
Corruption of an electoral process could most likely arise from the desire of "foreign powers to gain an improper ascendant in our councils." To minimize risk of foreign machinations and inducements, the electoral college members would have only a "transient existence" and no elector could be a "senator, representative, or other person holding a place of trust or profit under the United States"; electors would make their choice in a "detached situation", whereas a preexisting body of federal office-holders "might be tampered with beforehand to prostitute their votes".
Children are banned from casinos until they turn 18. Are you suggesting that that is a bad law that should be repealed?
I have dozens of posts saying the same thing because 90% of the posts in this thread are dopey replies attacking Harry for talking about a problem he has observed because he has some privileges in life, or dismissing Fortnite as being a problem because it's "just like other games" when it isn't.
I'm bringing facts to the debate and I've posted it many times in the hopes that the facts aren't overlooked and that people might learn something, and that we might be able to have a rational discussion instead of stupid thoughtless comments that have predominated so far.
That's all.
Sure, I completely agree.
On the other hand, children aren't allowed to go to casinos until they turn 18.
I don't have the answer, but pretending there is no problem, or that it's fully up to parents to monitor, does not seem to be the answer either.
Have you watched the video?
No?
Go watch the video and you will see why Fortnite brought in $2.4 billion in revenue last year.
It is not the same as "other games" and hence why it IS fair to single out Fortnite.
A football game that you spend money on tickets to see happens once or twice a week. You can play fortnite on your phone whenever you want.
Yes, parents are responsible for their children, but also children aren't allowed to go to casinos until they're 18.
Fortnite literally is not different than what casinos are trying to do, it is deliberately designed to make people addicted and spend money. Watch this video to see how insidious it is: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Actually you can't get the full gameplay experience without paying money.
If you don't buy a skin, then your player's appearance randomly changes between matches.
If you don't pay money, then you stop getting rewards once you reach level 62 in a season, you also get FAR fewer rewards over that time - if you pay money, you get at least 1 reward every single level up to 62 and then beyond to 100. If you don't pay money, you get a reward every 2-3 levels up to 62 and then nothing afterwards.
There are challenges that you need to complete any 4 of in order to earn extra experience to level up. You can only complete 3 if you don't pay money.
Because Fortnite is deliberately designed to be addictive in a way that those other games are not. It made $2.4 billion in revenue last year for a "free to play" game. Only WoW managed to come anywhere close to that.
Fortnite is deliberately designed to be addictive in a way that other games are not.
Really you just need people to follow the constitution and its checks and balances.
One of the points of the electoral college was to ensure that the public couldn't elect people who weren't fit to govern. They failed to uphold their constitutional duty after the 2016 election.
When the product that the psychologist designed is available to children under the age of 18 to play on their phone at any time of day, and parents are enabling them to do so, and the psychologist's product is legal, my investment money would go to the psychologist, not the chemist.
Fortnite brought in $2.4 billion in legal revenue last year, for a "free to play" game.