Slashdot Mirror
What It's Like To Work Inside Apple's 'Black Site' (bloomberg.com)
An anonymous reader shares an excerpt from a Bloomberg report: Apple's new campus in Cupertino, California, is a symbol of how the company views itself as an employer: simultaneously inspiring its workers with its magnificent scale while coddling them with its four-story cafe and 100,000-square-foot fitness center. But one group of Apple contractors finds another building, six miles away on Hammerwood Avenue in Sunnyvale, to be a more apt symbol. This building is as bland as the main Apple campus is striking. From the outside, there appears to be a reception area, but it's unstaffed, which makes sense given that people working in this satellite office -- mostly employees of Apple contractors working on Apple Maps -- use the back door. Workers say managers instructed them to walk several blocks away before calling for a ride home. Several people who worked here say it's widely referred to within Apple as a "black site," as in a covert ops facility.
Inside the building, say former workers, they came to expect the vending machines to be understocked, and to have to wait in line to use the men's bathrooms. Architectural surprise and delight wasn't a priority here; after all, the contract workers at Hammerwood almost all leave after their assignments of 12 to 15 months are up. It's not uncommon for workers not to make it that long. According to 14 current and former contractors employed by Apex Systems, a firm that staffs the building as well as other Apple mapping offices, they operated under the constant threat of termination. "It was made pretty plain to us that we were at-will employees and they would fire us at any time," says one former Hammerwood contractor, who, like most of the workers interviewed for this story, spoke on condition of anonymity because he signed a nondisclosure agreement with Apex. "There was a culture of fear among the contractors which I got infected by and probably spread." Apex manages the workers it hires -- not Apple. "Following an inquiry from Bloomberg News, the company says, it conducted a surprise audit of the Hammerwood facility and found a work environment consistent with other Apple locations," reports Bloomberg.
"Like we do with other suppliers, we will work with Apex to review their management systems, including recruiting and termination protocols, to ensure the terms and conditions of employment are transparent and clearly communicated to workers in advance," an Apple spokesperson says in a statement.
Inside the building, say former workers, they came to expect the vending machines to be understocked, and to have to wait in line to use the men's bathrooms. Architectural surprise and delight wasn't a priority here; after all, the contract workers at Hammerwood almost all leave after their assignments of 12 to 15 months are up. It's not uncommon for workers not to make it that long. According to 14 current and former contractors employed by Apex Systems, a firm that staffs the building as well as other Apple mapping offices, they operated under the constant threat of termination. "It was made pretty plain to us that we were at-will employees and they would fire us at any time," says one former Hammerwood contractor, who, like most of the workers interviewed for this story, spoke on condition of anonymity because he signed a nondisclosure agreement with Apex. "There was a culture of fear among the contractors which I got infected by and probably spread." Apex manages the workers it hires -- not Apple. "Following an inquiry from Bloomberg News, the company says, it conducted a surprise audit of the Hammerwood facility and found a work environment consistent with other Apple locations," reports Bloomberg.
"Like we do with other suppliers, we will work with Apex to review their management systems, including recruiting and termination protocols, to ensure the terms and conditions of employment are transparent and clearly communicated to workers in advance," an Apple spokesperson says in a statement.
Along with other horrific Apple experiments.
- An Apple contractor has a building that isn't as spiffy as the main Apple HQ?
- Do Managers tell staff to walk a few blocks because it's in an area where it's difficult for taxis to get to?
- Contractors for Apple don't get treated the same as actual Apple staff?
The article makes it sounds like there's something nefarious or dodgy going on but doesn't provide any real detail.
Having worked as a consultant and contractor myself (not for Apple). It always bugs me how I was treated like a second hand employee. Yes, I got paid more then the normal employees, but that is to cover the risk of being dropped at any time, and for me to find new business.
Contractors are often hired to work on "Career ending" projects, where a failure would cost your job and reputation (However working via a consulting firm, the individual gets isolated, as the firm takes the blame, and then just gets their licensed renew after the problem settles down). These jobs are often very complex, where a lot of things can go wrong.
That all said, there is often animosity towards the contractors. Which makes working cross departments difficult in general difficult, and often being blocked from accessing the companies soft employee benefits, such as the cafeteria, or the gym, in essence all these features designed to help improve productivity and moral. Means the contractors now are further hindered because they can access features to help improve their productivity and moral. Because being charged $250 an hour, you don't want to be caught at the Ping-Pong table, getting some exercise while you are thinking about how to solve the next problem.
Hearing that Apple Maps is primarily done by the contractors, I can see why it is a mess, not because of the lack of skill from these contractors, but because of the conditions they are working in. Granted what we hear isn't bad, but it is isolated from the Apple culture, so the Apple (lack of a better term) soul isn't there.
If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
... According to 14 current and former contractors employed by Apex Systems, a firm that staffs the building as well as other Apple mapping offices ...
Correction: a firm that formerly staffed various offices for Apple; considering how Apex has so severely mishandled things as to make their employees angry enough to "let the cat out of the bag," I'm sure Apple will be exercising one of their small-print termination clauses in the contract with Apex, forthwith.
I mean, come on; pretty much everybody knows that the only way to keep a "black ops" under wraps is to make sure that all of the participants are loyal to a fault and have a strong vested interest in the success of that op. The only (legal) way that corporations can ensure that is by offering lucrative financial incentives and a positive overall work experience to the employees... whereas it sounds a lot like Apex managed to offer every disincentive in the book. YUUUUGE fail.
I worked for apex on a Microsoft contract about a decade ago. They never tell you that the position is temporary. After 6 months, I remember other engineers mention that any tickets to the help desk may take longer, because they've all been replaced, "because apex does that sometimes to save costs". The help desk was also apex, so I thought was it suspicious, but didn't think much of it at the time, or that I might have the same fate. Anyways, at my 12 month mark, my badge didn't work to get into the building. I called my lead, and he escorted me in, thinking it was another mistake made to the physical security system. A few weeks prior, our site manager had been locked in a very small solid back room (which contained all the most expensive parts) for a few hours, as he was allowed access in, but not out (that would also be a fire safety issue). Anyways, so I worked half that day, until physical security said my access was removed and had to escort me out. My lead had no idea, told me to sit, and that security can wait, and was red in face pissed off. After he made a few calls, apparently there was a budget decision to hire replacements at half my pay($20\h to $10\h). Our project was almost complete with phase 1 (deployment), and phase 2 didn't need as much expertise(just maintenance). I got a better job, but wish I knew ahead of time
This follows the rule of equilibrium in thermodynamics. Always have something in contrast to even out the rest. It comes naturally, and is why I would rather go out kicking and screaming than work for big tech.
managers instructed them to walk several blocks away so any thing that happens is coved under works comp and hourly people need to clock out after that walk as well.
... assembling iPhones somewhere in WangTang where killing yourself seems to be an attractive option.
We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
Workers sometimes want to be contractors so they can cheat on their taxes, work part time and/or go on extended vacations. Corporations want contractors so they can fire them easily, and they don't show up on payrolls the same way (and do not have the scrutiny employees have, which often involve analyzing their degrees and university backgrounds, and rolling that up as high as the board of directors). I am not sure, in all cases, that contractors are cheaper to employ though. Perhaps apple can drive a harder bargain because the people in question might think they'll get a full time position? I don't know.
In most places I've worked in recent years contractors had to be given a minimum "time off" (unpaid, no badge) every so many months. They were OK with it because the up front cash was better than they'd get anywhere else and more than covered the gap. It still strikes me as an end-run around employment law that only works because both parties want it to. It usually requires a third party whistleblower to stop.
The right solution is probably not compatible with our laws and mindset. As far as I'm concerned employment should be a time for money transaction, "benefits" should be a government provided system, paid for by taxes, possibly enhanced by personal wealth. The difference between an employee and a contractor should simply be the size of the vehicle they show up with. Unfortunately we are in the position we are in due to conflicting ideologies allowing the wealthy to attempt to maintain a slave system.
I have been in two of their “black sites” for other projects, and it is funny that Lyft’s maps have the building code addresses. I was really surprised when standing next door that it knew its code already. Just funny how hard people sometimes work to keep obvious secrets hidden.
(Hint— look for the security guards with logo jackets.)
"Isla Sorna" is what they should call it.
Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
... they could just put the treatment of contract employees into the contracts that are signed with their contractors, and enforce those contracts. Apple's lawyers wrote the Terms of Service and Privacy contracts that customers automatically agree to. Have you ever read those contracts? I'm sure those same Apple lawyers could write up contractor contracts that specify, to similar detail as the Terms of Service, just how the employees of those contractors should be treated. imo, the fact that we see less than Apple-like working conditions at these "black sites" means that Apple is aware of the conditions and allows the conditions. Think about it, would a contractor want to go up against Apple's legal department?
FTS: Apex manages the workers it hires -- not Apple. "Following an inquiry from Bloomberg News, the company says, it conducted a surprise audit of the Hammerwood facility and found a work environment consistent with other Apple locations," reports Bloomberg.
"Like we do with other suppliers, we will work with Apex to review their management systems, including recruiting and termination protocols, to ensure the terms and conditions of employment are transparent and clearly communicated to workers in advance," an Apple spokesperson says in a statement.
Translation: This work site is just as shitty as all our others, and the fact that employees are booted without provocation or notice has been clearly communicated.
Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
Have you purchased US-based IT equipment in AU lately? Should kind of make you wonder who's getting screwed, eh? : P
At my company, contractors are treated more or less identically to full employees.
And that's how contractors win lawsuits to get full benefits.
Given the legal climate Apple is smart to take a hands-off approach to contractors and let conditions be totally managed by this other company,
I know most of them have been offered full time positions, but for whatever reason they prefer contract positions.
(A) This may be in violation of contracts they have signed with the contracting firm they are working through.
(B) Being a contractor in a large company is nice because you are more sheltered from political intrigue.
(C) You can often figure out how to give yourself equivalent benefits company workers get for less than they are paying, combine that with a higher contractor salary and converting to an employee can mean quite an earnings hit.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
Except that if you believe the statements from our government (statements that they can't back up with any evidence), all the Chinese stuff is compromised and feeding all your data back to the Communists.