Slashdot Mirror


India, the World's Second Largest Internet Market, Is Turning Its Back on Silicon Valley (venturebeat.com)

An anonymous reader shares a report: For years, India has wanted foreign companies to thrive in the country. When the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) took power in 2014, one of its early major pushes was to formulate plans and structure incentives to attract foreign investment. In 2015, Prime Minister Narendra Modi unveiled plans to liberalize the foreign investment rules. He also visited the U.S. and met with top Silicon Valley executives, nearly all of whom subsequently expanded their commitments in India. It further introduced lofty incentives to encourage companies to participate in Make in India and Digital India, a set of state-run initiatives to drive job growth in the nation.

[...] But over the past year, in the run-up to the general elections in May, the Indian government has unveiled -- and in many cases, enforced -- a wave of sweeping changes. It now dictates how foreign companies handle and make use of Indian user data and other aspects of how ecommerce platforms operate, and it is working on introducing greater oversight for technology platforms. [...] Lobby groups that represent U.S. companies and industry watchers say they see an extreme shift from the "warm, welcoming, collaborative" approach the government exhibited in 2014. "In the past year or so, the engagement has been combative, with abrupt, disruptive policy changes that are being held without consultation, and, unusually, with absolutely no room for negotiation or even deadline extensions -- as we saw with data localisation and FDI in ecommerce," Prasanto K Roy, a technology and policy analyst, told VentureBeat.
The story also looks at how much revenue Silicon Valley companies that count India as one of their biggest markets is generating there. Spoiler alert: it's very little.

24 of 164 comments (clear)

  1. Blame Facebook and Google by Kohath · · Score: 4, Informative

    A couple bad actors ruin the trust for everyone.

    1. Re:Blame Facebook and Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's about money. More specifically, it's about money flowing (or not flowing) into the pockets of the politicians.

    2. Re:Blame Facebook and Google by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's about money. More specifically, it's about money flowing (or not flowing) into the pockets of the politicians.

      It is more than that. India has a deep anti-business culture and a knee jerk mistrust of foreign companies. This is worse in eastern India. Good luck getting anything done in Bengal. But even in western cities like Mumbai, or Tamil areas like Chennai, there is roadblock after roadblock.

      Even the political corruption is dysfunctional. In China, you can use the guanxi system to bribe one bureaucrat, and then they will clear the path for your project. But in India, the bribee will just take your money and step aside to let you deal with the next guy with his hand out. They feel no obligation to help you or champion your project.

      30 years ago, China and India were about even on GDP per capita. Today, China is ahead by a factor of four. There are reasons for that.

      If you need manufacturing expertise, go to China. If you need cheap labor, go to Bangladesh. If you need English speakers for your call center, the Philippines is welcoming. India has no competitive advantage in any of these areas.

    3. Re: Blame Facebook and Google by edris90 · · Score: 2

      Smart. If you don't want outside entities are eroding your country's autonomy, make everything extremely difficult for them to do business with. I don't think India wants to become another puppet Nation 2 world trade agreements. I think it prefers to maintain it's Sovereignty. I can't help but admire it. Once what country starts to measure success by economics people quickly lose their value as anything else then potential resources to be exploited.

    4. Re: Blame Facebook and Google by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      Smart. If you don't want outside entities are eroding your country's autonomy

      44% of Indian children are malnourished. 72% of Indian infants are anemic.

      So not so "smart".

      Malnutrition in India

      In China, the number of malnourished children is negligible. They are welcoming to foreign investment, and have done it without "eroding the country's autonomy".

      30 years ago, China and India chose dramatically different paths. It is now obvious which turned the wrong direction. Economic isolation doesn't work.

    5. Re: Blame Facebook and Google by Spamalope · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In China, the number of malnourished children is negligible.

      Suuure. And the Tiananmen Square protests ended peacefully.

      The same was true under Mao. Eventually. After the mass starvation and 50+ million dead there were indeed far fewer malnourished people.

    6. Re:Blame Facebook and Google by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 3, Informative

      Lobby groups that represent U.S. companies and industry watchers say they see an extreme shift from the "warm, welcoming, collaborative" approach the government exhibited in 2014. "In the past year or so, the engagement has been combative, with abrupt, disruptive policy changes that are being held without consultation, and, unusually, with absolutely no room for negotiation or even deadline extensions

      Translation: India went from bent over and ready to take any size phallus that foreign corporates wanted to shove up its arse to actually trying to protect its own people's interests. I wish more companies were "combative, abrupt, and disruptive" to the likes of Google, Facebook, and others.

    7. Re:Blame Facebook and Google by GuB-42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Are you joking? There are a lot of bad actors who are much worse than Google and Facebook. A significant part of them aren't even aware of how bad they are.

      Facebook and Google are huge targets. They are under high scrutiny because everything they do have a million times more impact than the same thing done in mom's and pop's website.

      I've seen so many appalling things being done simply because of incompetence: password recovery methods sending you your plain text password, mailing list using the "cc" field, exposing hundreds of addresses, a real estate agency exposing all their customer data in a windows network share on an open WiFi network, ... Some small companies that simply never heard about protection of personal data. These are all small scale but as a whole, they probably end up doing more damage than Google, Amazon, Facebook, Apple and Microsoft combined.
      Ending that kind small scale of abuse is a large part of GDPR btw. Things like the Data Protection Officer requirement (who doesn't have to be a new hire) is just a way to tell companies, big or small, to actually care.

  2. Not the worst idea, actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Facebook and the likes have amassed a lot of power. An open market is a fair practice, but it is incredibly important that every country tries to build their own ecosystem of tech companies. It's unfathomable to imagine five U.S. companies dominating in most markets.

    1. Re:Not the worst idea, actually by alvinrod · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think this is a gross oversimplification. For India it probably makes sense given the large size of the country as well as the capabilities of their workers (no one would complain about H1-B workers otherwise) and there's plenty of reason for a home-grown industry. However, should Ireland prioritize that same buildout (at least in terms of social networks) or would it just be better to leave that up to others so that Ireland can carve out its own niche?

      There's as much folly in believing that everything needs to be produced locally or within a country as there is in outsourcing everything. There are a lot of countries that would benefit more from their high skill workers going into medicine, etc.

    2. Re:Not the worst idea, actually by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There are a lot of countries that would benefit more from their high skill workers going into medicine, etc.

      Plumbing. That's what they need.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  3. Seriously? by rmdingler · · Score: 2

    Indian politicians may have reservations about inviting foreign companies into domestic markets, but it's much more likely Silicon Valley companies haven't put forth the effort to seduce Indian legislators. Thinking the World needs you is confidence of the sort folks find distasteful, rather quickly. /p>

    India's lawmakers are elected members of Parliament. Seriously, a bit of lobbying effort would go a long way.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

    1. Re: Seriously? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How is that different than here in the US?

      It is completely different. I have lived in America for more than 5 decades. Here is the number of times I have paid a bribe for anything, ever: 0.

    2. Re: Seriously? by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

      In India you get to pay a bribe for the privilege of paying a fee. These 'jobs' are handed down, from father to son.

      Like being a cop in Mexico. The job doesn't pay a salary, it has a yearly cost. Overhead that must be covered.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    3. Re: Seriously? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      Read the Chicago Tribune re alderman shenanigans, then we can talk

      In America, a politician accepting a bribe is front page news.

      In India, a politician refusing a bribe is front page news.

      Not quite the same thing.

  4. Racist? by reanjr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So, Europe imposes user protection and they are progressive champions of the people, but India imposes user protection and they are a backwards second world nation who doesn't know how to operate in the global economy, is that it?

  5. Re: H1-B by vasanth · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You make your rules, we make ours.. we don't run the country for the benefit of US companies.. the same way as the US

  6. Not confused by tomhath · · Score: 2

    "world's second largest internet market" = lots of people

    "generating very little revenue" = no money

  7. Fair demand by gopla · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It looks like India is making a fair demand from Silicon Valley companies. When it invited them with open arms it was expected that the warms would be reciprocated It looks like India is making a fair demand from Silicon Valley companies. When it invited them with open arms it was expected that the warms would be reciprocated.

    It is not one way street, that all companies get access to Indian markets and India don't even get a say on their users data security and privacy. Expecting financial data of Indian users to be stored locally is a reasonable demand. Another regulation that separates market place and manufacturer i.e., restrict monopoly power of market place provider is also reasonable. It provides level playing field to everybody.

    If Silicon Valley companies expected to be given open field without any regulations, then it can be only termed as their fault. If they term this as turning back on Silicon Valley, it is their choice.

    It is expected that companies like Twitter and Facebook remain impartial in the upcoming elections. Not take any sides and try to meddle in the election processes. Otherwise, they will have to be ready to face more stronger regulations.

  8. You must be this rich to ride this ride by OrangeTide · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Personal bribes are rare in the US. Our pay-to-play system is beyond the reach of your average wage earner.

    Corruption happens primarily in secret and between the most powerful and wealthy. This is different than some countries where it can be normal to pay a police officer a "fine" that he pockets. Try that in the US and you'll not have a nice day.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    1. Re:You must be this rich to ride this ride by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Corruption happens primarily in secret and between the most powerful and wealthy.

      Actually, most corruption in America happens openly and is completely legal. There are essentially no legal limits on how much money lobbyists and special interest groups can funnel to a politician, nor is there much incentive for the politician to refuse their offers.

  9. China booms despite Mao by aberglas · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You made the amazing point.

    Mao destroyed China. First the Great Famine. Then the Cultural Revolution removing the intelligencia. 1976 China was impoverished of both money and culture and any quality of life. India was democratic, free, and its economy growing due to the green revolution.

    Then Mao dies, the Deng Xiaoping revolution happens and China takes off. From a base of nothing, to what it is today. Truly amazing.

    There is something deeply ingrained in Chinese culture that Mao could not kill and India does not have to make money. And as a result, despite the authoritarian issues that we find repulsive, the average poor Chinese lives much better than the average poor Indian.

    The future may not be so bright for China. Xi Jinping's counter-reformation cannot be good for Chinese business in the longer term. And certainly not if they take on an aggressive foreign policy, in which case he could take down the entire world.

    But for now, something about China is much, much more effective than the way things are done in India.

  10. Not going to matter one way or another by Orleron · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I definitely don't think this is going to matter one way or another. I actually have a fair bit of experience doing business in India, and it amounts to this: whatever someone will pay you in the US or EU, take a tenth of that and that's the MOST you will get from Indian users. I used to sell medical device coatings that would cost $20-$75/per coating per device. That's more than most people in India pay for the WHOLE device in most cases, depending. I sell courses online for $200/pc on my personal site. Indians offer about $20 for them, and still ask for discounts. I teach courses for a company that charges roughly $3,000 per person to have me teach them for three days, and we never go to India because there's no one in the whole country that would pay that. They keep trying to get us to go there for like 20 bucks a person. Not gonna happen. The reason for this is money is on a completely different scale there. A white collar professional makes about $600 to $1,000/month. That's considered good money. I tried to break a 1000 rupee note at a hotel concierge once (roughly equivalent to a 20-dollar bill), and they didn't have enough money in their entire cash register to do it. You can't make real money in India. If you do anything there at all, you do it because you want to help.

  11. Hmmm by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 2

    Perhaps India simply pays attention to what the likes of Google, Facebook, Microsoft, et al are doing to the United States and want absolutely no part of it.

    Life is much easier if you're capable of learning from someone else's mistakes.