Slashdot Mirror


YouTube Videos Could Get Demonetized If They Have 'Inappropriate Comments'

In response to a mother's inquiry into why her son's gymnastics videos were deemed not advertiser friendly, YouTube said on Twitter it has "taken a number of actions to better protect the YouTube community from content that endangers minors." The video-sharing website went on to say something very concerning for anyone who has ever uploaded a video to the site: "... even if your video is suitable for advertisers, inappropriate comments could result in your video receiving limited or no ads (yellow icon)."

Essentially, what YouTube is saying is that if someone leaves a "incendiary or demeaning" comment, or one with "inappropriate language," the video which features that comment could get demonetized and the content creator would not generate money from it. If you've ever read a comment thread on YouTube, it shouldn't take long for you to realize how big of an issue this could become. According to YouTube's "advertiser-friendly content guidelines," the following content may not be suitable for most advertisers: "controversial issues and sensitive events," "drugs and dangerous products or substances," "harmful or dangerous acts," "harmful or dangerous acts," "hateful content," "inappropriate language," "inappropriate use of family entertainment characters," "incendiary and demeaning [content]," "sexually suggestive content," and/or "violence."

The best advice for circumventing this issue is to disable comments entirely, but this would significantly reduce the interaction between the YouTuber and the viewer. "If this is our new reality we're going to need the ability to restrict comments from accounts under 1-4 weeks old," says news commentator and YouTube personality Philip DeFranco. "Sounds like this is prime for weaponization. Also it would probably be best to have an official blog post instead of my tweet as a reference for this change."

52 of 347 comments (clear)

  1. Of course Brin & company will... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...have no problem collecting 100% of the ad money. They will still run the ad and bill for it, it's just a new way to stiff you out of the money.

    1. Re: Of course Brin & company will... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If they can detect those comments... Why not just hide the offensive comments ???

    2. Re: Of course Brin & company will... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They already massively shadow ban (i.e. comments just visible to yourself if logged in). Log out and they are not there, No explanation no indication this has happened. Worse it seems to happen particularly if you have a polite comment backed by links etc. that is considered wrongthink. But you can still see all comments like "kill all....", direct insults and the conspiracies. Total shit.

    3. Re:Of course Brin & company will... by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      My solution is to use YT-Adblockers and instead pay the content providers I like directly.

      FUYT

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re: Of course Brin & company will... by raynet · · Score: 2

      Perhaps your comments were moderated instead of deleted by Youtube's algorithm

      --
      - Raynet --> .
    5. Re:Of course Brin & company will... by djinn6 · · Score: 2

      YouTube Red / Premium is basically that plus some paywalled content. If everyone paid for it, advertisers wouldn't have a say in how YouTube operates anymore.

    6. Re:Of course Brin & company will... by sg_oneill · · Score: 2

      ...have no problem collecting 100% of the ad money. They will still run the ad and bill for it, it's just a new way to stiff you out of the money.

      Your making a critical mistake in understanding this. Youtube viewers are not the consumer. Youtube viewers are the product. Your eyeballs , watching youtube advertisements are what is sold to the real consumer, Youtube Advertisers.

      This is true of almost all entertainment economies since we first learned to reproduce performance with the advent of the printing press.

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    7. Re: Of course Brin & company will... by nctritech · · Score: 3, Interesting

      When I leave comments now, I right-click the post time on the comment and "open in a private window." If I don't seem my comment highlighted, I know it's been blocked or spam-filtered, either by the creator or by YouTube. I then delete and re-issue my comment with modifications until it posts. Oddly, deleted/orphaned comments are still counted in comment counts.

    8. Re: Of course Brin & company will... by mr.mctibbs · · Score: 2

      Drinking on the job isn't a good luck for anyone.

    9. Re: Of course Brin & company will... by Cederic · · Score: 5, Insightful

      all the paid Trump propagandists

      It is actually possible for real people to support the current US President. I mean, shit, he did win the election.

      Maybe, just possibly, those 'propagandists' happen to be 'people with whom you disagree' and not paid astroturfers at all.

      Indeed, it's the most likely explanation.

    10. Re: Of course Brin & company will... by Known+Nutter · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Am I the only one who thinks that commenting on YouTube videos is a bigger waste of time than fucking a sofa?

      --
      Beware of the Leopard.
    11. Re:Of course Brin & company will... by GuB-42 · · Score: 2

      It is not a common pile.

      My understanding is that content creators get half of YouTube revenue for that video:
      - For ads, they get half of what the announcers pay for the specific ads showns on your video, the number of views is far from being the only factor: the value of the ads shown, the proportion of people using adblockers, etc... It is extremely unstable and tends to drive YouTubers mad.
      - For Red/Premium, they get half of the subscription, weighted by watch time. Ads are of course irrelevant because Red/Premium users don't see ads.

      Content creators can see which part of their revenue comes from Red/Premium and with part come from ads. Most of the revenue usually come from ads but a premium view is typically worth more than an ad view.

    12. Re: Of course Brin & company will... by h4x0t · · Score: 2

      This is an excellent point. AC forgot to mention those duped by paid propagandists. They are people too.

  2. Happy Friday From The Golden Girls! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I hole-hardedly agree, but allow me to play doubles advocate here for a moment. For all intensive purposes I think you are wrong. In an age where false morals are a diamond dozen, true virtues are a blessing in the skies. We often put our false morality on a petal stool like a bunch of pre-Madonnas, but you all seem to be taking something very valuable for granite. So I ask of you to mustard up all the strength you can because it is a doggy dog world out there. Although there is some merit to what you are saying it seems like you have a huge ship on your shoulder. In your argument you seem to throw everything in but the kids Nsync, and even though you are having a feel day with this I am here to bring you back into reality. I have a sick sense when it comes to these types of things. It is almost spooky, because I cannot turn a blonde eye to these glaring flaws in your rhetoric. I have zero taller ants when it comes to people spouting out hate in the name of moral righteousness. You just need to remember what comes around is all around, and when supply and command fails you will be the first to go. Make my words, when you get down to brass stacks it doesn't take rocket appliances to get two birds stoned at once. It's clear who makes the pants in this relationship, and sometimes you just have to swallow your prize and accept the facts. You might have to come to this conclusion through denial and error but I swear on my mother's mating name that when you put the petal to the medal you will pass with flying carpets like it's a peach of cake.

    1. Re:Happy Friday From The Golden Girls! by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 3, Funny

      I hole-hardedly agree,

      Just for your future reference, the phrase is whole-heartedly.. I.e. you agree with your whole heart.

      So, is that the *only* one you're going to correct? Did you even read the rest of it?

  3. Golden Age is Over. by AtomicSymphonic · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Making a business or any sort of living as a content creator on YouTube seems to be coming rather quickly to an end if this rule takes hold.

    Then again, maybe all that will be left on YouTube are those that do this as a passion project and not expect to make money from it... Those that are only in it for the money will quickly move on to something perhaps more profitable.

    1. Re:Golden Age is Over. by NicBenjamin · · Score: 3, Informative

      Most of mine already have a Patreon. That and sponsored videos seem to be most of their revenue.

      Nobody depends on AdSense revenue since at least the Adpocylypse.

    2. Re:Golden Age is Over. by MobaHup · · Score: 2

      Patreon itself is pretty cancerous and may decide to remove your account for whatever you did or said on the platform or off it.

  4. Good grief by atrex · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If they're so obsessed about "protecting the children", then just hide and disable comments across the entire site on the Youtube Kids interface. Then it's just up to the parents to ensure that Youtube is locked in the Kids mode on their devices.

    1. Re: Good grief by peppepz · · Score: 3, Informative

      You need to understand how YouTube works. Videos don't generate money by themselves, it's advertisers who pay; since their own livelihood, and certainly their return on investment for the ads, depend on their public image, they have a reason not to publish ads on videos that are used by paedophiles to do their thing. YouTube have no say in this decision, and if they can't manage to appease the advertisers, the alternative is for them not to get money any more - at all. Surely that would hurt content creators even more.

    2. Re:Good grief by bob8766 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      They aren't concerned with making this a safe space for children at all. They want to make it a safe space for advertisers . Want to make a video on a political topic? Nope, that's getting demonitized. Can't take a chance that someone sees and ad next to a video of something that might offend them.

    3. Re: Good grief by Chas · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I understand.

      I also understand that a content creator could do NOTHING WRONG, and could still have legitimate videos demonetized through no fault of their own.
      Simply because some jackass puts up a comment.

      --


      Chas - The one, the only.
      THANK GOD!!!
    4. Re: Good grief by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Demonetized videos still show ads: YouTube keep 100%.

      The whole system is rigged against the content creators and the only option is to not play the game.

    5. Re: Good grief by tehcyder · · Score: 5, Funny

      The problem is the left and the right which make up 98% of the world are just nuts and demand this sort of bull shit. Advertisers responded. YouTube responded. The 3% who are not nut jobs and want freedom over safety are working on moving to New Hampshire and organizing a free state to be less harmed by the nuts jobs everywhere else.

      Yes, you're 101% correct.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    6. Re: Good grief by rtb61 · · Score: 2

      Of course if no one see the content, well advertisers are paying for nothing. Just another scam by google to reduce outgoings, what is bad language in one tongue is just an expletive in another. So from an Australian perspective, you scummy pack of Alphabet cunts, stop pushing your fucking bullshit on the rest of the world, seriously go fuck yourselves. All legal words in Australia and Google can eat a dead dogs dick.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    7. Re: Good grief by alvinrod · · Score: 2

      Which all but guarantees that this will be weaponized. Don't like a video or a content creator on YouTube? Why bother with a well-released response or making a video of your own, when you can leave comments designed to get them demonetized. Pretty soon creators will be forced to disable comments entirely because they can't take the risk if their content production has become their livelihood.

    8. Re: Good grief by Pyramid · · Score: 2

      You just demonstrated that 77.8769% of all statistics are made up on the spot.

      You've got it backwards - it's the 3% fringe that are the problem.

      --
      ~Any apparent grammatical or typographic errors are caused by defects in your display device.
  5. So anybody can now sabotage any video? by gweihir · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That will work out well. Everybody on YouTube, no matter how nice or friendly, has enemies. There are a lot of dissatisfied, cruel, envious and stupid people around and also some outright psychos. If these people now get handed a Really Big Stick, they are going to use it.

    On the plus-side, this extreme stupidity hopefully will hasten the demise of YouTube. It has vastly overstayed its welcome anyways.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    1. Re:So anybody can now sabotage any video? by Calydor · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How long until 4chan weaponizes this with a comment posting script to attack ALL of Youtube at once?

      Random video, random comment from random account containing a bunch of random keywords. BOOM.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
  6. Morton's Fork by mentil · · Score: 2

    So Youtubers uploading videos of minors are going to have to choose between no comments or no monetization? This'll doom channels that are specifically about audience participation, like "leave a comment about what you want me to do in my next video". This'll push more Youtube content creators to accept kickbacks from companies to shill their products, rather than being able to rely on monetization and potentially remain unbiased.

    --
    Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    1. Re:Morton's Fork by CronoCloud · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This'll doom channels that are specifically about audience participation, like "leave a comment about what you want me to do in my next video".

      If only there was a way for viewers to send comments and suggestions directly to the content maker, like sending a letter in the mail. We could call it "electronic mail" People could have addresses where such "e-mail" could be sent.

      All sarcasm aside, perhaps those youtube content creators overlooked how useful e-mail is in their haste to adopt social networking platforms.

  7. False flags galore by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What'll happen is people who hate others speaking their minds will infest their comment sections and troll them, leaving inflammatory comments. This'll get them demonetized, which is about the same as being shut down. Appearing on Youtube is a full-time job if you do it right. It's not vapid internet celebrities either, there is some really incisive content by people like Jimmy Dore that is regularly reported and demonetized by these trolls.

    Censorship isn't a school board banning Huckleberry Finn any more. In the corporatist system we have, corporate censorship isn't any different than government censorship. It doesn't make much difference whether the one silencing your dissent is Youtube or Andrew McCabe. The effect is the same.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    1. Re:False flags galore by Qwaniton · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Being demonitized is absolutely not the same as being shut down. In fact, nonmonetized videos are more true and pure, coming from the mind and the heart. Google doesn't owe you money, and the very concept of "monetization" is venal and corrupt.

  8. Use an alternative video sharing site by blind+biker · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I duplicate every video I put up on YT on at least one alternative site. So far I have everything up on Bitchute as well. Anyone who doesn't duplicate their content on an alternative video sharing site, is crazy.

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
  9. How to solve a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "How to solve an important but complicated problem"
    By: YouTube

    1. Ignore problem
    2. Keep ignoring problem
    3. Once people bring light to problem, keep ignoring it
    4. If it might lose you ad revenue, announce you're looking into it (but keep ignoring it)
    5. If it has caused you to lose ad revenue, PANIC! ANNOUNCE YOU'RE TAKING MAJOR STEPS TO SOLVE IT!
    6. Implement the worst possible solution to fixing the problem (Make sure the solution can be easily abused to shutdown small channels!)
    7. Wonder why people hate YouTube
    9. ???
    10. No profit

    1. Re:How to solve a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Note: Step 8 is missing because YouTube has ignored that problem

  10. This isn't about kids seeing comments by raymorris · · Score: 2

    This isn't about comments that they don't want kids to see.
    This is about some really messed up stuff that happens with the algorithm for recommending videos and comments certain people post on videos of kids. It's a messed up situation that needs to be addressed somehow. Hopefully YouTube will come up with better solutions.

  11. Will they refund advertisers as well? by Sivaraj · · Score: 2

    Why should the content creators be solely responsible for such comments. Isn't Youtube jointly responsible? Will they refund the money charged to their advertisers?

    If not, this is only a tactic to maximize their revenue, not for protecting children.

  12. If they can identifty the comments... by jonwil · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If they can identify the comments and demonetize or restrict the video, surely they can give creators the option to instead opt for the comments to be deleted or blocked when they are detected. Some way that creators can choose to have the inappropriate comments removed to prevent demonetization.

  13. Re: Think of the Children Hysteria by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Actually, it's "think of the advertisers" (who don't want their products associated with some kind of comments and might stop paying)

    Anyone else? They don't care.

  14. Money, money, money by jenik · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A mother wants to make money off her son's gymnastics videos? This world is really going to hell...

    1. Re:Money, money, money by doubledown00 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Exactly this! I'm more creeped out that she's trying to monetize her 5 year old this way. It's not a platform to share "OMG cute!" videos anymore. It's "Hey Austin, do something adorable so mama and dada can make this month's mortgage payment".

      Also lost in this lady's question, but probably very relevant, was Youtube's announcement the other day that they had identified videos that had high pedo interest. One of the top categories *drum roll* Youth gymnastics videos. It is possible that Youtube's actions were an attempt to prevent sickos from looking at her kid!

    2. Re:Money, money, money by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2

      Exactly this! I'm more creeped out that she's trying to monetize her 5 year old this way

      Are you creeped out that some big corporation will make the ad revenue on her son's gymnastics video (to the extent that she doesn't)?

      Did you castigate America's Funniest Home Videos when they'd send somebody $100 for a tape? What's the objective criteria here?

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  15. Re:Think of the Children Hysteria by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you get a boner watching a video with a child, the problem is not the video but you.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  16. Re:No worries, by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That was my thought as well. If I don't like certain social or political commenters on YT, I can just post a few inappropriate comments on their videos and take away their ad revenue.

    --
    If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
  17. backwards by sad_ · · Score: 4, Insightful

    why punish the video, while the commenter is the one who should be blamed.
    wouldn't it be easier to set a time limited (or permanent) commect ban on that id?

    basically you could build a bot right now that makes sure everything on youtube get demonetized.

    --
    On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
  18. What a dick move by ReneR · · Score: 2

    Expected nothing less form silicon valley ethics, not. Take the users content, make big $$$, give nothing back. profit.

  19. Inquiring mother, as bad as the pedophiles? by sabbede · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Well, probably not, but she is exploiting her kid for money. And how many of the viewers are pedophiles? If she's moderating comments she probably knows at least some are, yet continues to try and make money from her son showing off for them.

    Maybe don't put your children on YouTube.

    Maybe don't try or expect to make money from your child being on YouTube.

    Maybe we all know that social media isn't good for kids anyway.

  20. Bots by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    forget that. It'll be bots. Lots and lots of bots. Including Bots by state actors attacking videos they don't like.

    Say goodbye to any political discourse that isn't from the establishment. Say goodbye to anything that's not pro-corporate.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  21. Contamination Spreads by Bromancer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Which would be great, except the people who run google are effectively friends with those in Patreon. So, the same policies are spreading over there. If you have content that they deem offensive, then Patreon is defunding you too. This famously occurred for Sargon of Akad last December, which is the reason some large content creators who champion free speech left patreon in protest.

    You might feel your content is safe, and it is just those "bad" people who disagree with you get silenced. The problem is that when bad means disagree, you can find yourself suddenly on the wrong side very quickly.

    Free speech is the hardest thing, because it means defending the right of someone to say something that is completely annoying to you. It goes against human nature, which makes it one of the great intellectual achievements of humans.

    Ironically, you might not see this post because my karma is bad. My karma is bad because I said some very, very critical things about the slashdot community chasing politics over the quest for science. Even here, censorship happens.

  22. Turning Comments Off Not The Solution by lance_of_the_apes · · Score: 2

    "The best advice for circumventing this issue is to disable comments entirely, but this would significantly reduce the interaction between the YouTuber and the viewer."

    Not only that, but videos with comments turned off gets pushed way down the priority list when it comes to their search engine. I have some videos with comments off that don't show up in search results even when the terms are VERY specific.

  23. Comment ranking system by Macdude · · Score: 2

    If only there was some way to rank comments, on say a -1 to 5 scale, then people could view comments at the level they're personally comfortable with.

    --
    "Grab them by the pussy" -- President of the United States of America