Slashdot Mirror


Police Department Accused of Updating Their Radios With Pirated Software (www.cbc.ca)

Winnipeg's police department used encrypted radios to stop the public from listening in to their conversations with police scanners. But did they pirate their software keys?

Long-time Slashdot reader Curtman shares this report from CBC News: Winnipeg police have arrested a manager with the city for allegedly updating police radios with fraudulent software he got from a person considered to be a security threat by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, CBC News has learned. Back in 2011, Ed Richardson allegedly obtained millions of dollars worth of illegal software and instructed city employees to use it, police said in a January 2018 sworn affidavit, submitted to the Provincial Court of Manitoba when officers were seeking permission to search the man's emails...

In the affidavit, police said the Motorola radios needed frequent updating, which could only be done if the city purchased a "refresh key" or licence from the company to unlock the proprietary software. Motorola charged about $94 per update per radio, the document said, and a radio shop employee told police Richardson didn't like that. "[The employee] does not believe his actions were for personal gain; he believes that Richardson likes the idea of not giving more money to Motorola," the affidavit said.

The affidavit alleges that Richardson gave one employee 65,000 refresh keys, and told him that "you don't want to know where these came from."

In the affidavit, the employee adds that they "clearly" didn't come from Motorola.

74 of 143 comments (clear)

  1. Sounds like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A certain company is bilking governments and the taxpayers. Hmmm.

    1. Re:Sounds like by Calydor · · Score: 2

      Yeah, it sounds like these paid and required updates are a way of going around a ban on subscription services.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    2. Re:Sounds like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not to mention it sounds like a total ripoff... 94 dollars per update per radio? Thats highway robbery...

    3. Re:Sounds like by Calydor · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm thinking it's been something like $7.95 per month per radio, but rounded off to a yearly 'update' payment. Still ridiculous, of course. They should be opening an investigation into Motorola to see just how much money they're getting across your country.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    4. Re:Sounds like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      They should've thrown the law at motorola, or at least not signed that stupid contract in the first place and instead should have demanded functional radios rather than artificially crippled them.

      As such I fully understand why and hey savings for the taxpayer is all dandy. But it's the police and they gotta abide by the rules better than anyone else. So no pirating, eh. So this is more of a tax on idiot buyers getting suckered by sleezy sales. Too bad the taxpayer gets to pay for it, and not the bureaucrat fucking up.

    5. Re:Sounds like by TaleWeaver · · Score: 1

      Not to mention it sounds like a total ripoff... 94 dollars per update per radio? Thats highway robbery...

      Highway robbery is the bane of traffic cops.

    6. Re: Sounds like by Calydor · · Score: 1

      Now, I am not entirely well versed in US law and am certainly not a lawyer, but I seem to recall some law stating that any commercial offer extended to the state or government (and I'm assuming police falls under the state for this) must be the best possible available price-wise.

      This ... doesn't seem to match that. That's all.

      And as I said further up the thread, it sounds a lot like these paid updates only exist to get around calling it a subscription service, which in itself is borderline fraud.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    7. Re: Sounds like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Already exists. Called Yaesu.

    8. Re: Sounds like by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Manitoba isn't covered by American law. What the Manitobian law actually is, I have no idea.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    9. Re: Sounds like by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      And this is why Motorola is really afraid of Chinese brands like Hytera and Excera. Especially the patent fight with Hytera that effectively ended up being for some corner functionality that really doesn't matter for most users. The goal was to try to get rid of a serious competitor on the markets where Motorola dominates.

      Also be aware that the radios that people used to joke about like Baofeng, AnyTone and Tytera all are improving fast and are really challenging Motorola. You can buy 10 of them for what a Motorola costs and if it breaks just buy a new. Support is restricted to the downloads you can get from their sites.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    10. Re:Sounds like by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for being the arbiter of what's reasonable.. I guess if you feel that way, that's the way it is..

      I think paying for a iPhone is moronic... But I've never suggested Apple was ripping anybody off.. Don't want to pay for an iPhone? Buy an Android..

      Don't want to pay for Updates to your Motorola radio? Pick one of the other companies making encrypted radios.. Motorola doesn't have a goddamn monopoly.

      Maybe if you bought products from the company that was acting in a reasonable manner, the unreasonable ones (Motorola) would wither and die..

      Instead you steal from the shady company and the honest company never gains any traction in the market.

    11. Re: Sounds like by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Now, I am not entirely well versed in US law and am certainly not a lawyer,

      You aren't too hot on geography either.

      This is aboot Canada, y'hoser.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    12. Re:Sounds like by TXJD · · Score: 1

      Why would they do this? Motorola is free to set whatever price they wish to set. Winnipeg could just move to another vendor if the pricing is objectionable.

    13. Re:Sounds like by kbrannen · · Score: 1

      Why would they do this? Motorola is free to set whatever price they wish to set. Winnipeg could just move to another vendor if the pricing is objectionable.

      No they can't. There is incredible vendor lock-in with systems like this. At best, they find a local dealer who will cut them a deal to make it cheaper, but moving to another vendor is a multi-million dollar deal, and city governments don't do this lightly.

      Disclaimer: I work in this industry but not for Motorola. Also, Motorola is known for shennigans like this, but they can generally get away with it because they are in the #1 position, sort like in the 80's where "you can't get fired for recommending IBM".

    14. Re:Sounds like by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

      Have you not met people? You just described humans. We are great creatures. But at the same time were too smart for our own good. And were doomed to doom ourselves.

    15. Re:Sounds like by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      I concur with your statement.

    16. Re: Sounds like by Calydor · · Score: 1

      To be fair to myself I was running low on coffee and was just commenting off the replies, having forgotten exactly where this was going on. It just sounded like something you'd hear out of America.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    17. Re:Sounds like by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I see you've never had to deal with critical infrastructure before.

    18. Re:Sounds like by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Still ridiculous, of course.

      Hardly. For public safety infrastructure it's a small cost compared to the total ownership cost of the system itself. Last I checked with a Motorola TETRA system (the USA favours even more expensive P25) we were looking for 2 base stations in one system covering 400 radios a cost of $100k per year for license and maintenance. Radios are in the order of $2k each. And don't get me started on their cloud offerings. We balked at the cost as well and went to a competitor only to be greeted with figures that were very similar.

    19. Re: Sounds like by Curtman · · Score: 1

      But government purchasing officers have a mandate to evaluate multiple suppliers and get the best deal for the government.

      I can't tell if you're unfamiliar with our government or extremely naive, but our Federal government has spent literally billions of dollars trying to sort out its payroll software, and various governments of various political parties have not managed to figure something out yet in three decades of trying.

      This latest attempt by the previous Conservative government, they spent $2 billion on IBM software that IBM said wouldn't work when they began. Now the whole thing is being thrown in the trash and they are starting over.
      Phoenix, a timeline: How the federal government has spent nearly three decades struggling to deliver a new pay system for its 300,000 employees.

  2. jail / prison maybe the wrong way. an government by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    jail / prison maybe the wrong way. an government did this and the government may have to face fines.
    As for this manager what pressure was put on him from higher up's?
    Did they have the funds to even buy the keys?
    Why is the key giver not in jail?
    Will they be able to read the EULA line by line in court?
    What about the government contract with Motorola what is in that and will they be able to read that line by line?
    What is the real cost of the software???

    1. if they can't go over both any EULA and the contract then the case should be removed from criminal court. But moved to an civil court.

  3. intercepted transmission ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    >> Real transcription from an encrypted broadcast -->

    Ex sea tollit torquatos 302.32 definitionem. Graeco imperdiet vim in, facete delicata 411 principes nam ad, no elit tota qualisque vis.

    Invenire abhorreant cum ea. Per te dicant facete detracto. Ludus perpetua nec et, affert suavitate ad duo, saepe 112th semper habemus est et. Has sint possim detraxit ex.

    After decryption -->

    dispatch -- on route to investigate the 302.32 call. Send backup.
    okay car 411, proceed past the dunkin donuts on 112th street. and by the way, please pick up
    2 dozen donut-holes for the second shift. we'll pay you when they're delivered.

    Seriously, why are they using encrypted transmissions?

    CAP === 'scorch'

    1. Re:intercepted transmission ... by dryeo · · Score: 1

      >> Real transcription from an encrypted broadcast -->

      Ex sea tollit torquatos 302.32 definitionem. Graeco imperdiet vim in, facete delicata 411 principes nam ad, no elit tota qualisque vis.

      Invenire abhorreant cum ea. Per te dicant facete detracto. Ludus perpetua nec et, affert suavitate ad duo, saepe 112th semper habemus est et. Has sint possim detraxit ex.

      After decryption -->

      dispatch -- on route to investigate the 302.32 call. Send backup.
      okay car 411, proceed past the dunkin donuts on 112th street. and by the way, please pick up
      2 dozen donut-holes for the second shift. we'll pay you when they're delivered.

      Seriously, why are they using encrypted transmissions?

      CAP === 'scorch'

      To prevent outrage that the cops are buying dunkin donuts instead of timmies.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    2. Re:intercepted transmission ... by HiThere · · Score: 1

      I don't believe you, but my latin isn't good enough to check your translation.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  4. Re:Zipping doo da by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Copyright infringement is neither theft nor a crime according to everything I read here.

    In the US, copyright infringement is a civil offense, and I believe it is the same in Canada. So it doesn't make much sense that he was arrested for that.

    According to TFA, the actual criminal charges are for other things, including fraud and unauthorized use of a computer. Most likely they are just piling on charges to coerce him into a plea bargain.

  5. Re:jail / prison maybe the wrong way. an governmen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Is there any proof that an EULA was agreed on or even shown to any party?

    If there is a contract then that is what matters.
    Digital EULAs are nothing but hearsay.

  6. The real criminals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The real criminals here are Motorola for charging $94 per radio per update to let them change settings on hardware the police dept already owns.

    1. Re:The real criminals by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      The real criminals here are Motorola for charging $94 per radio per update to let them change settings on hardware the police dept already owns.

      Owning the radio and having a license to use them on a system are two different things. $94 is nothing, it's pennies when it comes to public safety radio systems. The radios cost thousands. The infrastructure 100s of thousands. The management and licenses hundreds of thousands again.

  7. Re:jail / prison maybe the wrong way. an governmen by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    what about vendor / distributorship contract? vs the Motorola contract / EULA?

  8. Little people ... by kbahey · · Score: 1

    Quod licet Iovi, non licet bovi. In other words, laws are for little people ...

  9. Police on a leash. by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you find you are suddenly in danger of being unable to use some functionality of your device then you have leashed yourself with closed-source software. If they had invested in contributing to an open source software then they would not be leashed. The real problem is that when people think of open source software, they think that because it's free that they should not allocate money toward supporting the software. This short-term MBA style thinking has kept open source projects very weak ("Why financially support a project if there is no immediate benefit?") and thus caused so many fools to put themselves on a software leash. In the case of expiring licenses, that leash is really a noose that slowly tightens around their neck until they pay.

    If businesses were smart then there would be billions of dollars invested to build/improve open source software. Instead there are peanuts because corporations are only looking out for "number one" as they cut their own face.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:Police on a leash. by Brett+Buck · · Score: 1

      If you find you are suddenly in danger of being unable to use some functionality of your device then you have leashed yourself with closed-source software. If they had invested in contributing to an open source software then they would not be leashed. The real problem is that when people think of open source software, they think that because it's free that they should not allocate money toward supporting the software.

      This is delusional. People buy "closed source" software from known companies because they at least have a hope (and usually a contract) to *support it*. Open source generally had *no support whatsoever*, or at best it's at the whim of some open-source zealot. Something goes wrong with your Motorola radio, you call Motorola. They give you a support number or website, they are contractually/legally obligated to support you under terms you agreed to.

          You buy/acquire an open-source "free software" product, you have *nothing*. Maybe theres a website where you can go, ask a question, and maybe someone answers your question, or maybe not, depends on how some individual feels about it that day. There's no one even pretending to be accountable for it, there's no one who gives a damn about your problem. Heck, if it's the police, you might ask a question and then get descended by a bunch of neckbeard shouting "fuck the police" or refusing to support you on their precious principles that law enforcement are the oppressors, or something equally stupid. It might have foriegn content when that is not allowed, and you can't tell, because it's not traceable and no one is responsible.

            Maybe you can hire some flaky hippy-types who job-hop every 6 months, maybe the know what they are doing or not, and guess what, you are now, quite unexpectedly, in the software development business.

            That's why people buy software from actual established companies, and that's why any responsible purchasing agent requires that the terms of support be explicitly stated in a contract. That's effectively impossible to ensure any of these things in a open-source contract, and unless there is something done about it, *you will never, ever make any headway*.

    2. Re:Police on a leash. by dryeo · · Score: 2

      People can sell support for open source just like closed source. Redhat for example has made a business of selling support for mostly GPL software.
      Likewise, Motorola could be selling GPL software with a support contract, only drawback is that if they charge too much, someone else can offer support as the actual source code would be available.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    3. Re:Police on a leash. by sjames · · Score: 1

      So you are saying they spend massive bux and leash themselves so someone calling himself Bob will tell them it will be goodly if they will reboot the device?

    4. Re:Police on a leash. by HiThere · · Score: 1

      That should be "How many times have you tried to enforce this"

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    5. Re:Police on a leash. by HiThere · · Score: 1

      A point. I, personally, am much more a proponent of free software, but in the 1980's open source frequently worked as you describe.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    6. Re:Police on a leash. by kbrannen · · Score: 2

      Disclaimer: I work in this industry but not for Motorola.

      Nice sentiment, but completely unrealistic. There is a lot of work to be done to create systems like this and the market is pretty small, compared to many things in tech. These are multi-million dollar systems and don't get changed just because someone feels like it. That creates incredible vendor lock-in. Also the expertise to create these systems can be hard to find. "Public safety" systems are not easy to do and really take a company to stand behind them.

      The best you could do would be for the federal government to fund creating open systems like this. However, I don't expect that to ever happen either.

      HTH,
      K.

    7. Re:Police on a leash. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      If they had invested in contributing to an open source software then they would not be leashed.

      If it existed then it may be viable. But quite frankly there is no competitor to a P25 or TETRA based public safety system in the open source world. Unlike Oracle you can't just download an alternative off the internet. Just like you wouldn't download a car.

  10. Motorola tried this with us over Y2K by wwphx · · Score: 5, Informative

    I was working for a fairly large police department, and our mobile data terminals (MDTs) were not Y2K compliant. They were 386's running Windows 3, I can't remember if it was Windows for Workgroups, and Moto told us they wouldn't roll over properly and would cost on the order of $300+ per terminal to update, and we had over 1000 cars.

    After researching further, we learned that when the officers logged on to our dispatch system that it downloaded the correct date/time from the Unisys mainframe, overriding the Windows clock. Y2K endrun, Motorola doesn't get a trunkfull of money from us. Everybody working 3rd shift on 31 December 1999 were instructed to log off just before midnight and sign back in just after. Everything worked just fine. The MDTs continued working properly for years until they were eventually replaced.

    The only Y2K casualty that we had was the Dispatch system on the HP minis! A patch was supposed to self-deploy at midnight: it was compiled and ready to go, but someone didn't run the link/edit step, and when it deployed, crashed it crashed the whole shebang. At least our Windows network was flawless.

    While I can understand the guy not wanting to pay Motorola a ridiculous amount of money to update the radios, if you sign the contract, you're obligating yourself to the licensing fees. Motorola was infamous for this, so either read the fine print and negotiate a better contract, or find a vendor that will give you a better deal - you don't have to deal with Motorola directly to buy Motorola equipment!

    --
    When you sympathize with stupidity, you start thinking like an idiot.
    1. Re:Motorola tried this with us over Y2K by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      and our mobile data terminals (MDTs) were not Y2K compliant
      This does not make sense ...
      Everybody working 3rd shift on 31 December 1999 were instructed to log off just before midnight and sign back in just after. Everything worked just fine. The MDTs continued working properly for years until they were eventually replaced.
      Then obviously it had no Y2K problem.


            if (XX99 < YY00) ...

      Works completely different if XX and YY exist or not and one is 19 and one is 20 ...

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    2. Re:Motorola tried this with us over Y2K by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Well, yes, but if they didn't have any log files, then restarting after the century rollover would fix things. Only when you need to keep dates from both centuries is this a problem.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    3. Re:Motorola tried this with us over Y2K by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      The entire system was not having a complex problem...
      Parts of a much wider network had to be considered and worked on.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    4. Re:Motorola tried this with us over Y2K by o_ferguson · · Score: 1

      I was working for Computer Dealer News in Toronto for the y2k roll-over, and the only system that died was a little monochrome 286 box that was custom programmed to be our punch-in, punch-out station died, so HR finally gave up trying to have us punch a clock.

      --
      - In Soviet Korea, only old people loose all their bases to Natalie Portman's petrified hot grits overlords.
  11. What does the $94 per update per radio cover? by Danielsen · · Score: 2

    I highly doubt that there are 'software' on the iButtons, they are basically just another 'small' storage media like a diskette, or a USB flashdrive.
    Are the $94 covering:
    1) Are they paying a one time fee to unlock the encrypted communication feature.
    2) A fee to get special trusted X509 time limited certificates to create trust between the radios.
    3) A combination of 1 and 2.
    For certificates to be used within an organization having its own chain of trust, getting a certificate from a third-party is less secure than a selfsigned certificate.

    1. Re:What does the $94 per update per radio cover? by Luthair · · Score: 1

      I don't think there is anything that could legitimately cost $94 dollars a year. Its a straight up rip-off from Motorola.

    2. Re:What does the $94 per update per radio cover? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The firmware updates for the radios mentioned are downloadable for free from Motorola's website as long as you create a free account, but to legally install them you are required to purchase a hardware "key" from Motorola. The key is nothing but a counter containing how many "updates" you purchased, and authentication from the firmware upgrading program telling you that you have upgrades available. The counter goes down by one every time you attempt a firmware update, whether it's successful or not. Flaky proprietary software crashes during the update? Too bad: you're out at least the purchase price of another firmware update key and if you're unlucky, the radio hardware as well.

      Illegally, you can do the same thing one of 2 ways: You can buy a hacked key with ~65,555 flashes available, which has been seen on ebay at times, or download leaked programming software (called "Depot") that will allow you to do the firmware upgrade with the freely available file without the key present, along with enabling pre-installed software-defined upgrades to hardware already present in the radio (such as different types of encryption, digital transmission instead of analog, etc.

      All you're really paying for is a counter to count down 1 bit every time you click upgrade, or running an extra program in the firmware of the radio.

    3. Re:What does the $94 per update per radio cover? by Danielsen · · Score: 1

      This remind me of the Shell car wash back in the early 2000's, where an iButton fob was used as a prepaid token for a number of car washes.
      It was possible to do a 'backup' of a new fob, and 'restore' it again when it was empty.

    4. Re:What does the $94 per update per radio cover? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I highly doubt that there are 'software' on the iButtons, they are basically just another 'small' storage media like a diskette, or a USB flashdrive.

      While you are almost certainly correct about what's on these iButtons, they actually have "Java iButtons" which have a processor onboard capable of running simple Java code. They are intended for upgradeable crypto tokens. Think SIM card.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  12. And they only use them to block us out by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Once upon a time, you could just buy a scanner and listen in on what the police are up to. They didn't like that, so they went to encrypted radios, and they give access to the system to cherry-picked journalists that won't hold their feet to the fire. The whole reason they even have radios that need updating is to keep us from keeping tabs on their misdeeds.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:And they only use them to block us out by jwymanm · · Score: 1

      Yeah it's great. Tax payers pay their salaries and they go to block us from listening in by using more tax payer dollars to do so. Absolutely insane.

    2. Re:And they only use them to block us out by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Which is probably very true for the Winnipeg police. Don't want to publish dropping people off 10 miles out of town when its 40 below.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    3. Re:And they only use them to block us out by Vertigo+Acid · · Score: 2, Informative

      Bullshit. HIPAA applies to covered entities and that's not the police

      https://www.hhs.gov/sites/defa...

      --
      Beta is bad enough to make me go edit settings like this sig that haven't been touched since I joined
    4. Re:And they only use them to block us out by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      If you get the spirit of the US Bill of Rights, it's that a low level of crime will be tolerated to ensure freedom and transparency of government.

      Certain states go further - in New Hampshire, 'officers and magistrates' are accountable to the people 'at all times'. In its framing, the People are explicitly supreme to the employees of the State. They're not legally allowed to hide and ambush the People (they do anyway of course because the Rule of Law is out the window).

      If your only choices were protecting HIPAA information and ensuring government accountability, then you would sacrifice the HIPAA privacy. It's not sacrosanct - it's just a statute that may not violate the Constitution.

      I once spoke with a Representative who was against police body cameras because in the event of a no-knock SWAT raid somebody might be undressed. I asked him where in the Constitution such raids were authorized and how he thought that unpresented warrants might be legal and he rapidly changed the subject. I didn't let him get away with that and told him to tackle the real problems.

      You have to watch out for these sociopath types - they'll make every inch you give them into a treacherous mile.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    5. Re:And they only use them to block us out by kbrannen · · Score: 1

      Once upon a time, the vast majority of the people did the right because it was the right thing. Someone had something, it stayed put, and no one was bothered. That meant you could leave your house, with your front door unlocked, and return later to find that nothing had been stolen -- ever.

      Now, we have locks on our front doors because we have to to keep people from stealing things. Now, the police have to encrypt their radio systems otherwise some [negative word of your choice] people will not only use scanners, but will also use their radios on the police networks and create nuisances of themselves at best, or prevent the police from using the systems (in sort of a DoS way). The systems have a way to "inhibit" those radios to get them off, but the more determined people have bought/stole/whatever a factory kit to unbrick the radios and then come back and do it some more. Therefore, encrypting the radios and system is the way to combat that.

      Disclaimer: I work in this industry but not for Motorola.

    6. Re:And they only use them to block us out by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      Now, we have locks on our front doors because we have to to keep people from stealing things. Now, the police have to encrypt their radio systems otherwise some [negative word of your choice] people will not only use scanners, but will also use their radios on the police networks and create nuisances of themselves at best,

      We have to have unencrypted police radio because if we don't, [a subset of] the police will use the radio system to facilitate crimes against The People.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:And they only use them to block us out by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Wow, what an amazing conspiracy theory you have there. How'd you get modded up? I used to listen to police scanners all the time and they're boring as hell. A lot of mundane business. When they switched to trunked systems it wasn't a conspiracy to keep TEH CRIMEZ from the honest (giggle) journalists, it was to make better use of scarce frequencies. Just a quick question, do you listen to Alex Jones? And have you been checked for schizophrenia lately? The disease often manifests itself with paranoia and conspiracy theories.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    8. Re:And they only use them to block us out by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Wow, what an amazing conspiracy theory you have there

      Not a theory

      How'd you get modded up?

      People with a clue must have got modpoints somehow.

      I used to listen to police scanners all the time and they're boring as hell. A lot of mundane business.

      These days, murdering the innocent is mundane police business, and so is hiding the fact.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re:And they only use them to block us out by beheaderaswp · · Score: 1

      These days, murdering the innocent is mundane police business, and so is hiding the fact.

      These days?

      You are obviously a person with bad memory or in the flower of your youth.

      Today's police violence/misconduct pales in comparison to the sheer majesty of brazen nefarious activities found in the 60s, 70s, and 80s.

      --
      Another consultant who stuck it out.

      "We are the Priests, of the Temples of Syrinx..."
    10. Re:And they only use them to block us out by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Today's police violence/misconduct pales in comparison to the sheer majesty of brazen nefarious activities found in the 60s, 70s, and 80s.

      They are killing us in record numbers, so I don't believe that for a second. They are still up to all the same old tricks.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  13. Re:jail / prison maybe the wrong way. an governmen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    As I said, the contract is what matters.

    If there is any claims of a digital EULA the response can be "I never saw it" or "this isn't what I agreed to" and then you have word against word.

  14. US DHS ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... security threat. The details that they are dancing around is that encrypted public service radios have been hacked. The information is out there, just like DVD and Blu-ray rippers. Patches are available for digital trunking scanners and SDR receivers.

    This is more about Motorola having made a promise to their customers which they can not keep. And as anyone involved with software knows, nobody can keep in the long term.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  15. Re:jail / prison maybe the wrong way. an governmen by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    I'm sure it can be read. My question is, will they finish before the heat death of the universe?
    and will they a jury that can live on $10/day that will wait that long?

  16. So, there are some bad ideas. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

    ... Richardson likes the idea of not giving more money to Motorola ...

    Giving money to and paying for a product/service are not the same thing.

    ... police said the Motorola radios needed frequent updating.

    This is the bigger question - why? Do radio signals get stale?

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    1. Re:So, there are some bad ideas. by xlsior · · Score: 1

      ... police said the Motorola radios needed frequent updating.

      This is the bigger question - why? Do radio signals get stale?

      Digital encryption certificates expire and may need to be updated, allocated radio frequencies may change and need to be re-programmed in, and more.

    2. Re:So, there are some bad ideas. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      ... police said the Motorola radios needed frequent updating.

      This is the bigger question - why? Do radio signals get stale?

      Digital encryption certificates expire and may need to be updated, allocated radio frequencies may change and need to be re-programmed in, and more.

      Okay... but frequently? Certificates should last a while, unless the vendor is trying to rip-off customers and I can't imagine cities re-allocating their EMT frequencies that often. Sounds more like a business model designed to generate income for Motorola. I imagine that they're probably locked-in at this point and finding an alternative secure radio vendor *and* migrating over would be a HUGE hassle. Still not an excuse for a LEO to get the certificates illegally.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    3. Re:So, there are some bad ideas. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Not just that, but the department should be able to load their own certs, or program their own frequencies.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  17. Re: Zipping doo da by Type44Q · · Score: 1

    In the US, copyright infringement is a civil offense

    Not if you're uploading, it isn't.

  18. Re:jail / prison maybe the wrong way. an governmen by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    Why is the key giver not in jail?

    The article doesn't go into technical details, but if this guy developed an independent programmer and key generator, he may not be under contract with Motorola at all and it's not [yet] illegal to write software to mod devices.

    The police department more than likely is under contract and apparently used that software to engage in theft of services (and possibly copyrighted software) from Motorola.

    I'm sure they'll want to scapegoat him anyway, as cops very rarely face punishments for their misdeeds.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  19. bone spurs by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

    Ask yourself, would Donald Trump do this??

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  20. Re:jail / prison maybe the wrong way. an governmen by omnichad · · Score: 1

    it's not [yet] illegal to write software to mod devices.

    If the programmer is in the US, then it most certainly is illegal, for better or worse. If the DMCA can be used by John Deere, it can be used by Motorola. They are circumventing a digital restriction.

  21. Re:It isn't. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    It's because of assholes like you that this is the exact direction the software industry is headed. Software as a rental.. I can't just buy Photoshop anymore..

    Don't be daft. Adobe would have gone that reason regardless just to get the people who don't need the new features to give them more money anyway.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  22. Re:Zipping doo da by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    Why is copyright infringement relevant here?

    Because there is more to law than a two worded title that you looked up in a dictionary, and the practices being described have always been codified as illegal in criminal copyright legislation.

  23. Re:It isn't. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Maybe, maybe not. You have no proof they would have.

    And you have no proof that they wouldn't have. If you get near a point, make it.

    What we do know is Photoshop was one of the most widely pirated software titles out there.

    So what? We also know that you're blaming people who would never have bought it anyway, who aren't reducing sales at all and who may one day purchase the software, for Adobe's corporate decisions. If you want to be upset at someone, be upset at the professionals who aren't paying for it, and are then making money with it, because they represent actual lost sales — and therefore an actual reason to implement this type of scheme. The hordes of kiddies who warez Photoshop and use it only to meme would never have given Adobe a dime to begin with.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  24. Re: Zipping doo da by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

    Not a lawyer but I know how to use Google. How you came to the conclusion that copyright is not a criminal offense is beyond me, when we all have seen warez pirates sent to prison.....