Slashdot Mirror
California Declared Totally Drought Free For First Time in Seven Years
California was declared totally drought free for the first time in more than seven years this week, following unusually abundant winter rains and snowfall statewide, according to the government's weekly report on U.S. drought conditions. From a report: The U.S. Drought Monitor's latest survey reflected an astonishing turnaround - at least for now - from a severe, prolonged dry spell that reduced irrigation supplies to farmers, forced strict household conservation measures and stoked a spate of deadly, devastating wildfires. A relatively small swath of California's southern-most region, including most of San Diego County, remains labeled "abnormally dry" on the drought map index, as does a tiny patch at the state's extreme northern end along the Oregon border. But this week marks the first time since mid-December of 2011 that 100 percent of the state has been classified as being free of drought, defined as a moisture deficit severe enough to cause social, environmental or economic ills. Conditions were classified as normal across 93 percent of the state.
He has long critized California's water management policies. It seems he's getting through to them now.
I know it's not close, but that's what my brain saw
Must be from all the Leftest Tears since Trump took office.
I've been told wet weather is a sign of climate change. Two years ago, drought was a sign of climate change. It's an all powerful phenomenon that explains everything.
Yeah sure thatâ(TM)s it.
Sad part is we're still paying drought prices thanks to Jerry Brown. One way to raise taxes without raising taxes.
We should put a stop to drought-free California now! Save the dunes!
It's because of all those liberal tears...
The issue was the price of water.
Drug Free?!
It's getting *worse* with every illegal immigrant crossing the border and every welfare check given to You Know Whos.
Isnt that how it works?
https://www.newsdeeply.com/water/articles/2017/01/23/how-california-can-make-the-most-of-its-rainfalls/
âoeWe designed our infrastructure in California to take that stormwater and send it out to the ocean as fast as possible, treating it as a hazard or waste,â said Kihara. Now STORMS, other state agencies and some cities are working to change that narrative. âoeIt previously got folded into the sewer fee, so your taxpayer money is taking that stormwater and routing it away. [But] the drought has made us look at what sources of water we can depend on other than Sierra snowpack, and along with desalination and recycled water, what about stormwater? We want the public to look at it from a different perspective: less as waste, and more as a resource.â
Don't most droughts occur in cycles? Shouldn't they be planning now how to capture as much water as possible for future use?
Anonymous comments are as pathetic as the anonymous "sources" that contaminate gutless journalism from the New York Time
Everyone should have access to Free Drought.
I was raised in CA and every year there was some idiot politician talking about how we were in a drought.
It's as if they don't understand, "average" rainfall. We'd get creamed in the winter, nothing in the summer, and they'd call it a drought.
When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
I am waiting to see who is going to be first to take credit for this.
Our snowpack is 70 percent of it's normal state.
There is a cost to everything.
-- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
If this is the first time in SEVEN YEARS that things are "normal", shouldn't we set a new normal, where drought is "business as usual"?
Sorry Trump traitors, but even when it rains, you're still a traitor about to hang! :D
It's probably just the aqueous lube Vlad Putin uses when he's plowing Trump's obese treasonous faggot ass, I bet he spilled a ton of that shit on the Steele video. Don't worry though - plenty more lube in prison, traitor. See Don Jr.
He'll never be caught without it, or he'd be literally fucked to smoking pieces in prison. He'll be there forever. Better ration it.
California has always had long droughts followed by huge rainfall years. The news is, as usual, full of bullshit.
Historical rainfall graph: https://d1ml0gfpm9yj9s.cloudfront.net/assets/ca_preview-6fae971b8680789dcdde43613804b49c.jpg
I'm going to celebrate by flooding the yard and putting out a slip and slide! Who's with me?
cause now there's enough water!
That'll be their mentality, just wait for it...
Never mind there wasn't enough water before they built the last 10 million homes...
Sure. I mean, saying ignorant and Deplorable things seems to be your bag. And Trump has offered worthless advice to California ("rake the forests", "Wall", "California needs water and should have planned for that", etc.).
So it's Leftist Tears (not 'Leftest') then, at least it's water and at least it's useful. Your ignorance? Not so much!
human caused climate change. If you're gonna blame every bad weather event on it you've got to give it credit for the good ones as well.
NOPE.
Trillions of gallons of water are simply flowing to the ocean. So the next time there is a drought Californians will bitch and complain about global warming. When pointed out that the lack of water is policial in nature, they reply, as always, with "So politics controls the rain now?"
Obama took credit for the healing of the earth and lowering of the seas before he even won the election.
and got a Nobel Prize for doing nothing!!
Just three years ago we were warned that due to climate change, California was in a state of permanent drought.
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/10/us/california-drought-water-restrictions-permanent.html
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2019/03/11/californias-permanent-drought-is-now-washed-away-by-reality/
Now plenty of water. A few years ago lake Michigan and other great lakes had levels at unprecedented lows due to climate change, now we are at high levels.
These tendentious "predictions" to scare people about global warming are always failing. Nature is far bigger and complex than us puny humans.
Beto's and AOC's shouting that we are 12 years away from global catastrophe falls in the same bucket...scare talk to enforce their radical socialist agenda masquerading under a green blanket.
And no ClickonThis writing above, there are no trends to more extreme weather. Just trends to more extreme shouting from the press about weather to propogate their agenda of energy poverty and social control. The IPCC reports so there is no link and our understanding of global warming and extreme weather was low. Those who know about weather know that in a warming world the temperature gradient from the equator to the poles (which are supposed to warm faster -arctic amplification) is reduced. And it is the temperature gradient that drives winds, jet streams, and storms. So, no, there are no trends to "more extremes in weather". Tornado are way down in the US, and despite the couple of hurricanes last year, that followed a 12 year hiatus of hurricanes to hit the USA. Flooding and new hot temperature records show no trends of increase (the 1930s were the hottest years in the US)
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/10/03/pielke-jr-agrees-extreme-weather-to-climate-connection-is-a-dead-issue/
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/09/21/dr-john-christys-testimony-before-congress/#more-71379
I
The article may say this much but while drought conditions do not currently exist due to a few years of heavy snowfall in the Sierras, because of the way we use and store water, California is *always* in a drought. One year of light snowpack and we're at a water shortage.
One more rainstorm, and we're going to start getting alligators.
Move to California! It's always nice and sunny!
OMG we have drought because it hasn't rained enough!
Better known as 318230.
This is not yahoo news, bitch.
'Go back to sucking your daddy's dick., seems thats what your good at, right.
More than trump did repubtard faggots.
At least Obama has the decency to give back. Trump just takes takes takes takes. Fucking partisan fag!
Specifically NorCal water being redirected to Southern California and particularly LA.
While we were under water restrictions up here in NorCal, all that water was being funnelled down to Southern California to the economic benefit of the water authorities and not the regional groups who should have benefitted from it. End result: NorCal had a 'drought' because all its water was being directed all the way down to SoCal because they would pay more.
The drought scam in California has been entirely fictional, and mostly related to the mega-cities like San Francisco and Los Angeles stealing all the water from the eastern range, rather than raising their own water prices and building out the infrastructure to get the water they need from desalinated brackish or seawater local to their own populations. The same applies to Southern California agriculture which shouldn't be stealing water from upstream sources, and instead working to ensure their own sources that aren't simply drying out another region.
As a final thought: This 'drought free' classification only applies to rainfall quantity. It doesn't solve a much larger underlying issue, which is the water table decline from excessive well usage. Unless and until sufficient clean water can be reintroduced to the water table to offset the losses from agriculture, commercial, and residential usage even years of drought free weather won't solve California's water shortages, nor those leading to desertification in states east of it (Nevada and Utah could both use recovery and restoration, as well as improvements to their own watershedding. There are a number of dry lake beds due to erosion or human mismanagement of the states that could be recovered with some mega-engineering projects. But who wants to spend money on infrastructure or planning for the future?
As someone who hates Trump, you should be aware that politicians tend to lie when it can increase their power over people. Seattle declares "droughts" all the time, but there's always plenty of water.
California has just spent more than a billion dollars restoring the spillway in Oroville. There are also several dam repair projects going on. New reservoirs are probably not going to happen, California has plenty of water as it is.
BS. Cities and towns only use about 10% of the water. The vast majority of water is used for agriculture and for environmental reasons (keeping rivers flowing, wetlands wet, and preventing saltwater inundation in bays). Yes most of the water used by LA metro residents is piped in from elsewhere. But it's a tiny fraction of the water that's redirected around the state. Southern California has very little agriculture - a few orange groves and scattered ground crops. The vast majority of agriculture is in central California (note that the Bay Area is actually in the middle of the state, not Northern California as its generally called, and is adjacent to most of this agricultural productivity).
What needs to happen is for the price of agricultural products grown in California to increase to truly reflect the scarcity of water. Agriculture contributes only 2% to California's GDP, but consumes 80% of its non-environmental water use. California's agriculture industry needs to be charged full price for the water it uses. People in other states will then either pay the higher prices for California crops and livestock, allowing California farmers to afford to buy water from sources in other states. Or they'll refuse to pay the higher prices, allowing production to move to states where it makes more economic sense to grow those crops and livestock. Both of these alleviate the endemic water shortages. But as long as the state government insists on subsidizing its agriculture industry with cheap water, it'll result in water shortages for residents outside of the agricultural areas. That's what happens when you subsidize something - it distorts the economy causing shortages elsewhere.
Well LA did drink the Owens Lake: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Owens_Lake
So...seven years of drought, seven years of plenty? Where have I seen that before...hmm
Why are you so mad? Is it because Trump wonâ(TM)t have sex with you?
I think you mean 366K, then percentage changes are making sense.
Learn what words mean. Drought is a level of water, not "zero water left"
The real "real problem" is that California has too many people and too much agriculture using too much water.
The highest estimate I could find of pre-contact population in California was about 700,000. Of course natives didn't use massive flood irrigation techniques, so the state's carrying capacity is probably much higher, but we're closing in on 40 million people here combined with an unsustainable Central Valley irrigation system that's already causing salination of the soil and draw-downs of aquifers to the point where land is subsiding.
For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
More than trump did repubtard faggots.
At least Obama has the decency to give back. Trump just takes takes takes takes. Fucking partisan fag!
What has Obama ever given back? He took more of the working classes money to pay for health care for everyone else. You're not charitable when you use other people's money!
No, it's not illegals that do that, it's California's massive (and rapidly growing) homeless population. Wherever they go, you're likely to find needles and feces on the sidewalk.
"If you like your doctor...."
Looks at your post...looks at UID...looks at post....looks at UID...
YOU'RE DRVING A DODGE! What the hell did you expect???
Didn't he give back part of that chicago park that he took for his "library"?
This is entirely political; the people pushing it have certain political policies they want to promote and they know the public would never allow those policies to be implemented in ordinary circumstances because they would severely harm the average member of the public. The solution they have log used is to claim that the sky is falling, that there is very little time to avoid disaster, and that their preferred political policies just happen to be the ones their "studies" require.
The all-time champion of this garbage was Paul Ehrlich, who scared people in the 1970s to badly that Hollywood latched onto his nightmare future predictions and started pushing films like Soylent Green and Silent Running.
Paul Ehrlich's partner-in-crime was Joehn Holdren, who went on to serve as President Obama's Science Advisor and helped with the propaganda effort to turn parts of the government into Global Warming and then Climate Change propaganda agencies.
In the 1970s, we were told the world would end before the 1980s if we did not accept leftist policies.
In the 1980s, we were told the world would end in the 1990s, and certainly before 2000 if we did not accept leftist policies.
Same in the 1990s and in the first decade of the 2000s.
Jest Google or DuckDuck or whatever for all of Algore's predictions, and the garbage announcements of stupid British royals ans Hollywood types etc about how we "only have 4 years to act" or "have to act within the next 6 years" or "we only have a decade left in whch to act" (none of these are direct quotes buy a smart person can rapidly find oodles of these conflicted predictions of doom by opinion makers). Anybody who took any of those predictions seriously should, by now, have given up and decided to live a life of reckless pollution and debauchery since it all clearly can no longer matter given all the point-of-no-return points we have crossed years ago.
It requires less water, and can make 1000x more money per acre.
No brainer, there.
We absolutely MUST stop this global warming! It is destroying out planet!