Linux 2.2.0pre6 Released
Chad Miller was the first
to tell us that pre6 is out. Remember that the new kernel.org mirrors
are up and running- you can hit ftp.<country code>.kernel.org for
a mirror near you. Help ensure that everyone can download it
faster so we can hammer this thing smooth for the 2.2 final.
Yeah!!another kernel, lets push this thing harder(ie play with odd parts of it as much as possible)As a note to people with freaky hardware configs, go out and patch your kernel, now is the "time" to do such things.
enjoy
Has anyone gotten FBCon to work on an x86 w/ a ATI Mach64 based card? (I'm using the all-in-wonder). In Documentation/fb/ there is only documentation for the Matrox and Vesa drivers, none for the Mach64, so I don't know where to start..
please don't rush the developers. we want this release to be stable, stable, stable! it would be very bad for linux in the eyes of system administrators, corporate entities, and the press if the "2.2" name was stuck on it before it was actually ready. it is far better to whine about bugs that exist _while_ it is in prerelease than to sit by with your 2.0.36 and whine about the amount of time it's taking for 2.2 to get released. jump in and help debug it!
I've been trying since 2.1.130 but I just can't get things working. I may just end up waiting
:)
for RH 6.0 or something, so that all my packages
are up to date. (I think everything's okay but maybe I'm missing something. Do I need glibc 2.1?)
Symptoms?
PPP (2.3.5) dials in just fine. It connects. I can ping. I can nslookup. I cannot telnet. I cannot ftp. I cannot web surf. It seems to be
that UDP works but TCP does not. (!)
I'm using the very same setup (PPP options, etc.)
in 2.0.36 and it works there, so I suspect that
something changed significantly in the TCP code
that makes it not work on my radio modem (Metricom/Ricochet), which has very high latency.
(Any other Ricochet users here?)
Oh well. 2.2.0pre5 is nice though, as long as
I don't want to use the net!
- Amit
pre6 may be nice, but it's not available at my mirror. The latest I can see is pre4. Of course, I can't get in at kernel.org either.
Doesn't seem worthwhile for me to test pre4 since pre6 is out.
Because of this *news* I've decided not to test the kernel at this time.
Is this the effect we want?
You probably should read linux/Documentation/Changes
At a guess, you need to upgrade your
net tools to the latest version.
glibc 2.1 is not required.
cheers,
Phil
There are several mirrors, try another. Yes, they do want to promote the latest pre-patch. Otherwise people will be reporting bugs which have already been identified and fixed, no?
Good luck!
Anyway on my SMP box, X (w/E) fails to start up under most kernels more recent than 2.1.99. Anyone else seen a problem like this? I'm not really sure that it's an E problem, because I've seen it under two completely different E versions (0.13 and 0.15). And there's no error messages that I can see, aside from the usual "connection to x server lost" when I finally get bored enough to alt-ctrl-bksp. mdmbkr http://mdmbkr.yossman.net
This is unlikely to get fixed for 2.2.0. See The ISDN code is old from Linux Weekly News.
Linux panoramix 2.2.0-pre6 #1 SMP Sat Jan 9 15:51:31 CET 1999 i686 unknown
5:55pm up 1:32, 6 users, load average: 1.26, 1.12, 0.77
This must be a FAQ. I tried building the kernel on a RH 5.0 (w upgrades). Kernel build SW complains about ncurses not being good enough. But I've got the latest 5.0 upgrade (1.9.9e or something). I downloaded the 5.2 ncurses package, but it's got a ton of dependencies, scaring me out of trying that. What's a guy to do?
Hi there. Incase anyone didn't know, I did changelists for the 2.2.0pre series of kernels (including pre6), they're on my page. http://edge.linuxhq.com
-Myrdraal
This sounds like a VJ-compression problem, as VJ-header compression only works when your packets travel one path to your ISP. Because Ricochet is a packet-radio type setup, it might be possible that your packets are going to different Ricochet relays and being reordered.
Try turning off VJ-compression on your setup and then try telnet/ftp/http etc.
--
Simon Janes
The Leaders of Men, made a promise for a new life -- Joy Division (as Warsaw)
Well darn, I've yet to try it with VESA, but so far the All-In-Wonder's VESA support has seemed half-assed. When I attempt to use VESA chipset with Svgalib (Mach64 chipset is pre-alpha and only supports one card), svga programs work fine, say zgv, but when I quit the program, my console is completely broken. I don't know any way I can reset the text mode.. So, I'm stuck with veiwing that latest screenshot in 320x200 unless I want to start X..
Could you not use ftp.uk.kernel.org instead ..?
I broke down and pulled down 2.2pre5 and installed it on my workstation. It seems to work fine for me. However, I'm going to leave my sever at 2.0.36. I use IPIP Tunneling and in the 2.1/2.2 series it seems IPIP tunneling just doesn't seem to work very well for me (after I spent 2 days on the web looking for information on setting it up on 2.1 - I finally found a reference to it on DejaNews in the old archive). I'll prolly switch to using IPsec (using S/WAN), but even that only runs on the 2.0 series.
--d`Recluse
Your X server expects to start in a VGA text mode.
If you enable the frame buffer console, X will
have to start from a graphics mode.
It will work fine for _some_ people. Results will
vary with your video hardware and X server.
I got this too, but I managed to fix it by not pushing
space, but instead pushing return to enter a new subsection
So, press RETURN for subsections and SPACE to select/deselect options
Hi,
Had this happened to me as well with zgv and 2.0.36 on a Mach64 card, so it may just be a problem with zgv and ATI cards. I was going crazy trying to figure out how to get my console back (X worked fine, but returned to that weired raphics mode).
I _THINK_ what I did was start up another SVGA program that put the display back to text mode properly when it finished. Also, you could try setfont next time it happens--this might load a useable character generator for your mode (if you can remember a font name!).
I like the new look. I saw your comment requesting feedback, then went looking for who to feedback to. Couldn't find an address showing.
Still, great work! Your site's invaluable.
Hi.
I have problem with IP-Aliasing during boot: "There is no kernel support for IP Aliasing", while there is support build in(not module). From shell after logging in, ifconfig works fine(i have latest version of net-tools).I have this problem on 3 different machines
I will be really thankfull if someone will help me to solve it.
Evgeny
Has anyone noticed that x11amp doesnt work with the 2.2 kernels ? It comes up with an error, too many open files with me!
I'm using 2.2.0-pre5 and quotas on a (single CPU) Pentium with no problems under Debian 2.0.
It says /dev/ttyS2 is busy when I try to start ppp on 2.2.0-pre6. On 2.0.36 all is working fine. I did upgrade the needed packages. It doesn't seem to be a real ppp-problem, it's just that it can't open /dev/ttyS2 which is my modem.
Ok I give in,
:-)
/usr/src/linux and do the make dep; make clean ; make zImage thing ???
...
I'm a recent RedHat 5.2 User (Kernel 2.0.36) and want to do my civic duty and test 2.2pre6. I also want to play with IpChains
Is there any FAQ's or help docos on apply new kernels. Is it just a matther of expanding the sources into
Help appreciated - abuse neglected
Oh yeah, I'll be charing $300 for a CD of Peterix since it's really a pain for me to burn CDs now. Sure it's a lot, but hey, you can't get Peterix anywhere else.
ftp://blue.netnation.com/pub/alan for now
until UWE is back
Then post it to linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu
because there are people who read that and hoover
up all the odd patches.
Its interesting 2.1.108 is the point of failure.
Thats the big ppp.c change patch so it makes a lot
of sense for 108 to work and 109 not too.
Can people with the Ricochet problem drop me an
email to alan.cox@linux.org - Alan
grep AF_* /usr/include/linux/socket.h for
the pf-* values
Detailed in /usr/src/linux/README
/usr/src/linux. Best for this be a symbolic link to a directory named for the version number.
/usr/src
/usr/src /usr/src
/boot, rename, edit
/usr/src/linux # -- not /usr/src .gz | patch -p0
/usr/src/linux .gz | patch -R -p0 .. # pop up to /usr/src for official patches .gz | patch -p0
Basically (from memory), extract kernel to
Then, cd
patch -p0
patch -p0
etc...
So, if you downloaded the full 2.1.132 sources, and want to get to pre-patch 6:
cp linux-2.1.132.tar.gz patch-2.2pre?.gz
cd
rm linux # If this is already a symbolic link
mkdir linux-2.1.132
ln -s linux-2.1.132 linux
zcat linux-2.1.132.tar.gz | tar xvf -
zcat patch2.2pre1.gz | patch -p0
zcat patch2.2pre2.gz | patch -p0
zcat patch2.2pre3.gz | patch -p0
etc... same for all Linus prepatches
cd linux
make mrproper #Redundant for first timers
make xconfig # or 'make menuconfig', etc...
make dep
make zdisk # or 'make bzdisk'
make modules
make modules_install
Copy zImage (or bzImage) to
/etc/lilo.conf (add as new image, keep old), lilo:
or just reboot from floppy
For new patches, just pickup from last patch line.
For AC (Alan Cox) pre-patches:
cd
zcat
# Note, are not intended to be shell redirect
# indicators in example above... Also, apply
# correct AC patch AFTER Linus pre-patch. ie.,
# linux-2.2pre6ac AFTER linux-2.2.pre6
Remove AC patches before next official pre-patch.
ie:
cd
zcat
cd
zcat
Whew... That was from memory, and from my personal experiences. Obviously, adapt this depending on file-names, compressor used, etc. Also, AC pre-patches could not be as consistent in starting point, etc. as I've indicated. But, if you haven't done it before, save you old kernel source tree and give it a go. You'll learn a lot by just doing it.
Any major errors, hackers? Please point them out.
Thanks.
Another anonymous coward (a different kind of AC)
Here's an idea: if you test it, it will come quicker. If you don't help test it, it will come later than sooner. Gee...simple logic. And Linus never promised a date. He "hoped" to have 2.2 ready...but people like you probably aren't sending in big reports so now it's been delayed. Thanks a lot, buddy!
Anyone else see this...
Pre6, with or without the pre6ac1 patch, and quake2 hangs machine solid during initialization?
Have to reset machine (p200mmx), magic sysreq no
help either. Same setup with pre5 + ac1 works.
Anyone who NEEDS 2.2.0 already can get it. Just use the pre-release; if it works for you (as it does for nearly everyone who's testing it) then you have 2.2; no new features will be added.
Linus never promised anything, he can only guess like anyone else, and hope, like anyone else. But, before the magical final 2.2.0 is bestowed on us, anyone who can should help to get it tested.
Finally, if you think this is like Microsoft, I DARE you to put Windows 2000 (formerly NT 5) beta on a mission critical server and leave it there till the final release. 2.2 is available now to anyone who wants or needs it, and you won't wait 6 months until the next bug fix.
Download 2.2pre. Compile and install. It IS a fun experience if you've never built the kernel before.
I've upgraded everything the changes file required me to upgrade.. PPP seems to work okay. Connects fine, things are functional. Problem is, my net traffic peeks at 1k/s. I have a 56k modem.. Things work fine in 2.0.x kernel series and i get rates of 3-4k/s. Any suggestions?
can someone help me to get 'scrollback' working using the Matrox fb?
Daniel - d1dd@dtek.chalmers.se
I've got it running but it's got a 3com ethernet card and haven't run x as yet. What problems are you having.
I really love programming with it! It's just like the old days of Mode 13h under DOS! So much simpler than X. Aside from OpenGL, it's the best graphics API I know of at the moment.
Install debian
Then you could just type "apt-get install libncurses4-dev" and it would download ncurses and all the dependencies automatically and set them up.
I'm betting that the reasons for the different names has something to do with RFC standards; perhaps the ppp-* and net-pf-* names are standard across different OS's. I think it could be a bit better documented, however.
/usr/include/linux/ppp-comp.h /* config. option for BSD-Compress */ /* config option for Deflate */ /* value used in original draft RFC *
Anyway,
I think what it is is that ppp-compress-26,24 go t o ppp_deflate, and ppp-compress-21 goes to bsd_comp.
From
----
#define CI_BSD_COMPRESS 21
#define CI_DEFLATE 26
#define CI_DEFLATE_DRAFT 24
whee -Me
As the only changes to the ISDN code are cosmetic, it's a fairly safe bet that it still won't work.
The ISDN link comes up and works for a few hours, but then fails, complaining
HiSax: if_command 14 called with invalid driverId 0!
until it's rebooted.
I did. And I've even got it back from linux-kernel, after the obligatory 2-day delay.
But there's no point trying to fix it - we just need to put the latest CVS code into 2.2.
To the original poster: you need to give more info. You say you've managed to ping and nslookup. Did you do that with IP addresses or domain name addresses?
Also, I'll mention a small problem I had when I moved up to ppp-2.3.5. It would dial fine, and connect, but wouldn't let me telnet and lynx anywhere (didn't try ping and/or nslookup). I made a slight change to my ppp-on script to add a defaultroute option to my pppd command line. Now it looks like this:
exec /usr/sbin/pppd -d /dev/modem 115200 \
defaultroute \
$LOCAL_IP:$REMOTE_IP \
connect $DIALER_SCRIPT
Hope this helps.
---
I've found ftp2.us.kernel.org to always have the newest stuff, while ftp.us.kernel.org takes forever.
I wonder if there is an ftp3.
The world is neither black nor white nor good nor evil, only many shades of CowboyNeal.
So when exactly is the actual 2.2.0 coming out?
Linus said in a Boot interview that it would be out by the end of October. Then he said it'd be out by Christmas. It's January 9th and I'm still waiting.
10 PRINT CHR$(205.5+RND(1)); : GOTO 10
We had a Cyrix 6x86-PR200 at our school that was doing exactly this. The machine was running one of the 2.0 kernels (probably 2.0.27 or so.) We never fixed the problem, as our plans for the machine changed and it became a web server as opposed to a shell-account machine. We just assumed that it was a problem with the Cyrix CPU as the computer was being weird and crashing in a lot of other ways too. Guess we were wrong.
It should be a matter of doing what you said - downloading the sources, exploding the .tar.gz/.tar.bz2, and running the various make commands. In addition to make dep; make clean; make zImage you will want to run one of make config/make menuconfig/make xconfig so that you can choose what nifty new stuff you want to go into the kernel. Just be sure you download the complete sources and not the patch. When you patch, you need to have the patch for each version increment from the one you have now. Moving from 2.0.36 to 2.2.0pre6 would require a lot of patches (I am assuming that one would have to work their way through the entire 2.1.x series first, but I may be wrong.). However, patches are nice for single-increment upgrades. There is a script that installs the patches for you, it's in /usr/src/linux/scripts/patch-kernel or something like that.
/usr/src/linux and make sure it is a symlink to /usr/src/linux-2.x.xx, and if not make it like this. Then be sure the new version expands into /usr/src/linux-2.2.blah, and then change the /usr/src/linux symlink. This way you can go back to the old kernel if things go wrong.
/boot directory. Keep the old kernel image file and name the new one something different. Then edit /etc/lilo.conf, add an entry for the new kernel, and run /sbin/lilo. If you are using an initial ramdisk because your root filesystem is on a device that runs off a kernel module, things may be hairy. Compiling whatever device you need into the kernel should allow you to avoid having to deal with this.
One other thing you may want to do is to take your old
Also, once you type make zImage, the finished file is in usr/src/linux/arch/i386/boot. (Unless someone changed it - it's been a while.) This goes into your RedHat
Hope this all helps.
when it's ready (TM)
It worked fine for me with one of the previous 2.2.0-pre kernels, but it screwed up X so I went back to the regular console. Why would anyone want to use it anyway? Apart from the cute penguin logo during bootup I couldn't detect any change.
(FWIW, my card is ATI Xpression+ - 264VT.)
Well, gosh, if Linus Torvalds doesn't know, what makes you think some idiot on /. is going to be able to give you a better estimate?
Here's a clue for you, since you appear to need one: No one knows the answer to your question! Anyone who gives you an answer is guessing at best. We don't have access to a time machine which would enable us to go into the future, find out when it was done, come back and tell you. Deal with it...
--
Starting reality daemon: realityd
"Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
Looks like your build tree got corrupted somehow... .../old-checksum.c and replaced by asm-code .../checksum.S
arch/i386/lib/checksum.c was renamed
In short, checksum.c should not exist.
To get back up to spec, you'll have to...
/* MAGIC THEATRE
ENTRANCE NOT FOR EVERYBODY
MADMEN ONLY */
you can reset the console blindly by typing:
reset
;)
-l
Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
I just installed 2.2.0-Pre6 and when I booted the kernel hanged on PCI probing for hardware.
I booted once more and this time it worked. The kernel I have used previously was 2.1.131 and it has never hanged that way. Anyone more who noticed this?
Please report to me (zivav@cs.bgu.ac.il), since
ATI cards are the most interesting cases:
I have the exact same model working in one machine
and not-working in another machine, without
a simple explanation.
I already have 13 reports on mach64 based cards,
but still can't predict if a given card will work
with the VESA driver.
Does dmesg show checksum errors?
If so, I have a workaround.
in line 1644 of /usr/src/linux/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.cn ge to
a line that begins with
if(tcp_v4_check(th,if(tcp_v4_check(th,
cha
if(0&tcp_v4_check(th,...
(so that the condition is always false)
Then, recompile and reboot.
It works for me.
all,
my compile always stops in arch/i386/lib
with the following error message:
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-2.2.0-pre6/arch/i386/lib'
make all_targets
make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-2.2.0-pre6/arch/i386/lib'
gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -fno-strength-reduce -m486 -malign-loops=2 -malign-jumps=2 -malign-functions=2 -DCPU=586 -c -o checksum.o checksum.c
checksum.c:200: redefinition of `csum_partial_copy'
checksum.c:105: `csum_partial_copy' previously defined here
{standard input}: Assembler messages:
{standard input}:188: Fatal error: Symbol csum_partial_copy already defined.
make[2]: *** [checksum.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.2.0-pre6/arch/i386/lib'
make[1]: *** [first_rule] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.2.0-pre6/arch/i386/lib'
make: *** [_dir_arch/i386/lib] Error 2
However by looking at the code i notice a
csum_partial_copy and a csum_partial_copy_fromuser, and not twice
csum_partial_copy.
So whats going on?
thanks guys, as you correctly stated, checksum.c
should not be there. so i just deleted it and the
build went just fine.
However I got a new problem:
startx fails with
Cannot open mouse (Operation not supported by device)
Mouse support is compiled in, however. Could that be related to the corrupted tree i presumably got?
it seems there is something wrong with my mouse.
when i do startx, i get
Cannot open mouse (Operation not supported by device)
I checked, and ps/2 mouse support *is* compiled in. This is on 2.2.0pre6 on a Sony Vaio.
what gives?
I'm running Red Hat 5.2 on a compaq deskpro, 200 Mhz. I've got on board adaptec scsi, and I have the built on network card (netflex i believe..). Whats the problem u have with it?
Blah blah blah, etc.
Also, should lockd be spewing messages to my console all the time?
When you download this pre, install and submit bug list! Not sooner!
Andrew
ftp.us.kernel.org: latest pre5
ftp.ru.kernel.org: latest pre6 !
Andrew
net-pf-3 should be off because no ax25 module is available yet.. net-pf-4 should be off if you don't use the ipx module, and net-pf-5 should be off if you don't use the appletalk module.
I have no idea why it would be calling ppp-compress instead of bsd_comp and ppp_deflate (both are ppp modules), but I would assume you could alias any of those ppp-compress modules to bsd_comp or ppp_deflate. =)
EraseMe
I have a RedHat 5.2 system that I had running 2.0.36 without any problems. It is a dual pentium pro system so I decided that it would be to my advantage to upgrade to 2.2 pre 4 for performance reasons. When I did so, things appeared to be working. However, it crashes everytime I use repquota to check user quotas.
I compiled quota support into my new 2.2 kernel and everything. However the crash is very dependent and it leaves the system running but nobody capable of logging in. Has anybody else had this problem? Has it been fixed some time between pre 4 and pre 6? Or might it be something that I am doing dreadfully wrong. I would have tried upgrading to 2.2 pre 6 except that I cannot afford to crash the computer because it is in a locked closet and a hassle for me to get in to reboot manually.
Please email me if you have any ideas.
Thanks!
Right now there is ftp1.us.kernel.org up to ftp11.us.kernel.org; "ftp.us.kernel.org" gives you a random site.
How many times do we have to answer this same effing question?
WHEN IT'S READY, AND NOT ONE PICOSECOND BEFORE.
At least one lamer asks this question for EACH pre release. When will you folks get the point?
BTW, "ready" means "when Linus Torvalds and Alan Cox think it's ready, announce that they think it's ready, and don't get any credible flames from the developers list".
Oh; and an equally credible answer is "it's ready now, use it and shut up yer whining".
The answer to this problem is in the FAQ on www.x11amp.org. What you need to do is turn off skins, or unzip the skin to a directory and run it that way. (That's what I'm doing and it works fine in 2.2pre4)
Chris"Wherever you go, there you are."
Unfortunately, I can't get into ftp.uk.linux.org to pick up the inevitable pre6ac1 patch. Perhaps kernel.org needs to start mirroring that list of patches as well.
World Beach List, my latest project.
I can maintain a ppp dialup connection for 10 days or more with 2.0.x, but not for more then a few hours with 2.2.x. Yes, I am using the lastest ppp. I also noticed some neat things in my syslog. Anybody else having this problem?
/dev/ttyS1
Jan 9 14:09:08 bd pppd[770]: Using interface ppp0
Jan 9 14:09:08 bd pppd[770]: Connect: ppp0
Jan 9 14:09:11 bd modprobe: can't locate module ppp-compress-21
Jan 9 14:09:11 bd modprobe: can't locate module ppp-compress-26
Jan 9 14:09:11 bd modprobe: can't locate module ppp-compress-24
Jan 9 14:09:11 bd pppd[770]: local IP address
Jan 9 14:09:11 bd pppd[770]: remote IP address 38.1.1.1
Jan 9 14:10:00 bd modprobe: can't locate module net-pf-4
Jan 9 14:10:00 bd modprobe: can't locate module net-pf-5
Jan 9 14:20:00 bd modprobe: can't locate module net-pf-4
Jan 9 14:20:00 bd modprobe: can't locate module net-pf-5
Thanks ..
(*)Console Drivers
... although, I couldnt get vga=anything to work on boot so I just manually used fbset to set the frame buffer mode I wanted in one of my rc files. It also messes up the mach64 xserver .. I had to switch to vesa (fbserver works too, but its a pain)
..
(*)ATI Mach64 Display Support
works like a charm here
talking windows users is where I draw the line
Tis better to be silent and thought a fool, than to open your mouth and remove all doubt --Abraham Lincoln
I have observed the exact same problem. It happens with every kernel after 2.1.108, where there was a "major PPP rewrite". I've sent detailed bug reports to the PPP maintainer and to the listed author of the rewrite with no answer (I even said "what can I do to help track this down", but no reply -- grr!), and I've searched all over dejanews and mailing list archives, but (until today) haven't found anyone with the same problem.
To anyone who would offer suggestions:
1. Yes, we're using the latest pppd.
2. Yes, we have routing set up correctly.
3. Yes, we have our PPP options set up correctly.
If you don't believe me, then note that the exact same configuration works *great* in 2.1.108 and below, and that IP, ICMP, and UDP all work fine; it's only TCP that breaks.
The only clue I have is that people with later kernels and PPP have suffered from "TCP stalls". This is a different, but similar problem, where TCP becomes very very slow sometimes. Perhaps the extra latency of the Ricochet turns "very very slow sometimes" into "never works ever"? Kinda dubious, but...
It's too bad Amit didn't include his e-mail, I'd like to get in touch with him.
P.S. Several times recently, I've had a problem, tried to diagnose it or search for a fix, with the same results -- some combination of the following:
1. I search DejaNews and mlist archives, and find others with the same (or similar problems), who have posted about them but gotten no reply (or maybe one or two unhelpful replies).
2. I post myself, and get no reply (or maybe one or two unhelpful replies).
3. I e-mail the maintainer, and get no reply.
4. I fix the problem, and post a patch to a mailing list, and get no reply.
5. I mail the patch to the maintainer, and get no reply, and it isn't folded in. In both (4) and (5), I include "bug fix patch!" prominently in the subject line.
This gets frustrating after a while. I think a major problem with open source (and Linux in particular) is that the low S/N ratio of public channels makes it very difficult to be heard, especially if you're not a well known contributor, or you have a relatively esoteric problem that doesn't happen to (directly) affect loads of other people.
I have the same problem, and no, there are no checksum errors. (In fact, there are no errors at all in dmesg or anywhere else.)
Well, I'm going to post to the linux-ppp mailing list. We'll see if we can get some response on this issue (at least some clue about how I might go about tracking the problem down).
Hi,
I had this problem too ( with all the 2.2.0pre series ), but a friend ( Hi Victor! ) mentioned to me that there is a 'fix' on the X11amp web site.
Not a fix really, but the problem is when using zipped skins. If you unzip your skin, and point to the dir in your config file ( instead of the zip file ) everything works fine. Or just do not use skins.
Bas
i've found pre6 to be VERY swap-happy, to the extent that once in a while it will swap like nutz, leaving about only 3 or 4 meg of stuff resident, this is on a 64meg machine. doing anything in netscape is unbearable, unfortunately had to buttshuffle over to the win98 box to post this...ugh..
when will the actual 2.2 kernel be out?
Look out honey, 'cause I'm using technology; Ain't got time to make no apology
I tried to compile the 2.2pre5 on a SS20 with RedHat 5.1 kernel 2.0.34. The make dep; make clean were ok but it crashed on the file of the make vmlinux. Can someone help me with this one, I never compiled a linux kernel on a Sparc before.
Has anyone watched the console and get "TCPv4 bad checksum from (whatever IP)".
I got this on pre 2 and pre 5 but 2.0.36 worked ok
This tends to slow the connection esp. on long downloads
Any ideas?
has anybody tried real player with any success on the new 2.2.0 pr kernels? i keep getting:
***audio: write error
messages...local or streamed.
I just compiled my first 'pre' kernel last nite, and upon reboot, it says that I'm still in 2.1.132 yet when i uname -r it brings back 2.2.0pre6. Is this normal?
Also, anyone else have any problems with DHCP with 2.2?
"Where is my mind?"
Nope, that didn't help at all, besides, it was working in 2.1.132.
I just manually entered the ip and mask and everything looks dandy.
"Where is my mind?"
PPP worked as recently as pre5, then all of a sudden went poof when I went to pre6. I'll probably just back up to pre1 or something. But any ideas on this? I setserial everything correctly like I normally do, and poof. No response from modem.
----- When it is dark enough, men see stars.
If you are from the first console, press CTRL-ALT-F1 to read your error message.
I can't get myself through the KDE that I have installed on my system as well with the new kernel. I think it would be my old library file which need update. Anyway, I am waiting for the Redhat 5.3 or SuSE 6.0 or whatever that comes with Kernel v2.2