Slashdot Mirror
Red Hat Portal Picking up Steam
NoWhere Man
noted a story on CNet that that talks about
Red Hat
and their plans to
Create a full blown Linux Portal.
They note the fact that RH has job openings in San Fran, as well as
the trivia that they recently hired 20 (!) people from Atomic
Vision. They note that RH will be competing more directly
with VAs Linux.com, and of
course, yours truly.
Look at the last couple of articles posted here. They are ALL either Linux related or not computer related at all. This place IS a Linux joint. Shame on you, Commander "Sellout" Taco.
When did we start competing? I remember the good old days when redhat.com, slashdot.org, etc. were all meant to be resources for users, and cooperated on providing the best service to the Linux community. Since when do slashdot and Red Hat (quite publically now) consider themselves competitors? How will this impact RH news on slashdot?
Hello, Red Hat, portals suck. They're the hottest thing now though. They're the "push technology" of 1999.
That's OK. Linux is the "Java" of 1999. It won't matter much once the hype dies down.
Malda was pretty smart to sell out when he did.
Their true motives will be determined if they use Adobe/Macromedia/NetObjects, etc. to build the portal with. I assume most Linux/BSD web sites are built from the command line. If they want money the will develop it on a MS machine.
A portal site? Man, that's a lot of typing.
Not that I'm _really_ bothered but I think we could have something new. Maybe a ESR vs. RMS war
? We just fake-mail a message coming from Linus.
In the event of an attack, rebooting a starship is not an option.
All this hype and linux is still NOT a viable alternative to an MS OS if you must interact with the rest of the world. Until the level of compatablilty approaches 100 % this is a huge waste of space. What do I do with a $%#$%% .doc .xls file......
file under linux, or a F'N
Archfeld@hotmail.com
I hope your post is some kind of joke.
By the way, I'm curious to see how your "unregistered" copy is different from the full version.
talking is basically more CLI-like then GUI interface, isn't it? and Picard SAID to computer... (speech is a linear stream of info just like written text, whereas GUI is not).
so he would not need to say bring up the command line interface because he was in command line interface:-)
[I am not against GUI]
erik
This "Microsoft of Linux" crap is pure bullshit. You can't make it true by repeating. And you are pretty evil or paranoid or both to keep doing so. Get a grip, people!
Damned trolls. Shareware == crippleware == beggarware.
FOAD
You mean freeware.
Xtacy is right. You open .doc files in Staroffice or Wordperfect and you open your .xls spreadsheets in Staroffice as well! It works fine. That would be like me installing Win98 and saying "What am I supposed to do with this!? I can't read this .xls file!? Win98 SUCKS!" Well geez.. if I install MS Office I can read the file. Shucks.
RedHat is trying to manipulate the whole Linux community and you're saying they are better than SuSE, who fund a lot of free software developers and still keep a low profile?!?
If quality matters to you, you stay clear of RedHat anyway.
If freedom matters, so should independence. SuSE's Yast and SaX tools are free to use, modify and copy, so downloading isn't a problem. Sure, you can't sell those tools at insane prices, but then again you don't have to use them. Advanced SuSE users don't need them anyway.
At least SuSE produces these tools on their own, so it's up to them to choose the license.
RedHat, however, is much worse. They abuse free software projects for their own goals. They hijacked GNOME to make it 'their' project.
Now their proclaimed goal is to make a "windows clone", which is the last thing the GNOME community wants...
Then they make 'quasi-proprietary' changes to make it harder for the software to run on non-RedHat systems. Sure the code is free, but it's still hard to play catch-up.
Very sad indeed...
Is that a Unix distribution? If so, we don't care. We only care about Linux.
What about the holodeck??? You can't say that wasn't GUI...
Opinionated Law Student Strikes Again!
Slashboxes. Selection of articles you want to see based on subject and author. Moderation.
Slashdot is a portal, duh. Or rather, it can be used as a portal, a looking glass, into the Linux community. If you go to straight-up slashdot.org not logged in, it's just a news site).
So, it's a BBS, a news site, a portal, a forum for writers to try ideas on for size.
The amazing thing is that it does almost all of it right.
--Matthew
That really did not need to be pointed out, not to mention that it isn't quite accurate (two different connotations is not neccessarily redundant). Basically, while it isn't flamebait, it is a rather useless and picky comment.
I'm sure you've made your share of grammatical errors, so don't correct grammar/spelling unless it is necessary in order to clarify a comment.
Posted by the Proteus
We may not imagine how our lives could be more frustrating and complex—but Congress can. – Cullen Hightower
> You mean freeware
No, free software or open source.
Freeware can apply to any free of charge software including binary only software. Internet Explorer is freeware but it's not free software (free in both senses) or open source.
--
Oooh oooh oooh! This is just so great! Now, instead of going directly to the web sites I want to look at, I can spend hours waiting for some P.O.S. portal to load instead. What a genius move. Its a wonder someone didn't do this before.
Mmm, feel them flames of competition. Mmm, barbeque!
Serious multigigabuck competition will do fun things for the face of the Linux world. Heck, it'll do fun things for the face of the whole bloody world.
Lotta things gonna change, lotta people going to be called the {microsoft | Stalin | nazis | RIAA} of {Linux | Open Source | Free Software | Unixen | hackers} first, but we'll get there soon.
Capitalism is coming to Linux? Hell, Linux is coming to Capitalism!
--G
So it is true then, Slashdot IS a "linux portal" and not a news site for 'cool' geek news anymore?
"Red Hat plans to create a full-fledged Linux news service as part of its effort to increase market appeal and potential profitability."
.... And that is exactly why it won't work. Change the motives. Every hire Red Hat is getting so the product can get closer to windows, the farther Red Hat seperates themselves from the Linux culture.
Besides, RH's portal is just plain DOG UGLY.
Wow. RedHat really is getting ambitious. I am through with them. I swear I'm going debian with my next distro.
...why? Isn't the Linux community about cooperating and building tools and such that complement eachother?
Why is RedHat doing this? Competing with Slashdot? Competing with Linux.com?
Why are we now competing? Well heck I think I'll go code a new GPL scripting language... oh no wait, how about instead, in the true spirit of the Linux community, I'll help an established language like Perl by making modules and CONTRIBUTING and reviewing source code, beta testing, etc. etc.
RH is doing EVERYTHING they can to become the Microsoft of Linux (granted its not a perfect parallel, but be imaginative). They are distancing themselves from the community and breaking the original spirit by becoming money-hungry competitors instead of contributors. They don't want to HELP Linux, they want to BECOME Linux. Suits. Next we'll see proprietary "RH ONLY!" extensions and file formats. Goodbye RH, hello Debian.
----- if ($anyone_cares) {print "Just Another Perl Newbie"}
warn "Just Another Perl User" if $anyone_cares;
I don't like RHAT at all anymore. I'm not trying to get others to hate them, but I am just pointing out that they are distancing themselves from the Linux community, and are totally ruining their image as part of the FS/OS movement (in reference to the afore-mentioned quasi-proprietary RHAT linux stuff). And they are on the road to splintering Linux the way the big boys did Unix.
BTW, I am not overly fond of Canadians... but do we really need to kill them? Some of them are quite nice! Well, the German ones. Sometimes.
----- if ($anyone_cares) {print "Just Another Perl Newbie"}
warn "Just Another Perl User" if $anyone_cares;
I'd say that a "portal" site is designed to encourage people to make it the default that your browser starts up with.
Netscape.com was the first real "portal", because most people left the default as it was shipped. Then Netscape invented their "Net-Center" concept, and all of a sudden yahoo.com became the number one web site, as users fled from that grossly over-complicated monstrosity.
No one seems to have learned this lesson, however, and web "designers" the world over think that they're going to get lots more eyeballs if their page takes ten minutes to load on a slow modem.
Redhat's site went from bad to worse on their last re-design. I don't have high hopes for the next one.
(The feature that they *really* need is a searchable archive of the redhat mailing lists. This has been busted for years.)
If I look at www.redhat.com, the top story in their Slashdot box is "Be Inc. IPO launched"
When I click through to redhat's filtered version of slashdot, and compare it to slashdot, I see that there's another missing story also: "Red Hat Portal Picking up Steam"
I'm sure if you asked them about it, Redhat would tell you "our lawyer's made us do it", and I would *hope* that this filter is going to be dropped after the IPO... but still, things like this make me a little uneasy.
Um, I meant to say that the mail archive on the redhat site has been busted for *months*.
Years?
I am a little fuzzy on this as well, although I had thought that a good working definition would have been 'a website that is a collection of links to other informative resources, bundled together with as much original content as is economically possible' with an example being yahoo.com
/. would not be defined as a portal.....
However, under that definition,
I drink to make other people more interesting
They lost the tender for linux.com, so now they go away and have a sook and try to make their own.
Yet another case of NIH syndrome that is so rampant at redhat.com.
Matt
Why would they be competing with /.? You do more :-)
than linux news (not much more, but more.
-WW
--
Why are there so many Unix-using Star Trek fans?
When was the last time Picard said, "Computer, bring
Not to be too anal, but "cult following of /." ;-)
and "Slashdot is part of our culture" are
redundant.
-WW
--
Why are there so many Unix-using Star Trek fans?
When was the last time Picard said, "Computer, bring
I'm so sick of this phrase... "The Microsoft of
Linux."
What does that mean anyway?
Are you saying that RedHat should strive to break
even? You don't want them to be a successful
company? Is Microsoft the only successfuly company
you've ever heard of, or do you just want to
associate RedHat with an eviiiiiiiiiiil entity?
Just wait until they've gone public, if you think
they're trying to be "like Microsoft" now.
-WW
--
Why are there so many Unix-using Star Trek fans?
When was the last time Picard said, "Computer, bring
You're right... what does that have to do with .sig?
my
Please don't assume I use/like Windoze just
because I write a pro-GUI statement. Ever heard
of BeOS?
-WW
--
Why are there so many Unix-using Star Trek fans?
When was the last time Picard said, "Computer, bring
Is this what Microsoft means when they say Windows NT is "Enterprise Ready"?
cpeterso
With Redhat IPO'ing its no surprise that they are trying to expand as much as possible... I don't mind it too much but I am worried that Redhat is going to become the Microsoft of Linux (although they are much better than that crappy Suse)
Slashdot is part of our culture!
Arnt Miggy and Nat in San Fran. I hope they dont get to them as well
people...you should be ecstatic no matter what linux news makes the headlines.
any linux news in the news is good news.
Sensei
Sensei
Linuxnewbie.org home of the NHF's
I keep hearing so much about Web Portals, but still have heard no clear definition about what a portal is supposed to be. All I keep hearing on the news is all these big companies trying to make the latest and best portal site.
This is great news for the shareware operating system Linux. What I want to know is, when is Linus Torvalds going to send me a registered copy? I sent in my $7 three months ago, and I have yet to receive anything, even an email from him.
Keep in mind, there are so many distros of Linux that there is more Linux news to be reported than other OS news.
Also, all stories are posted from user-submitted stories -- you want to see a story on a non-Linux OS? If it's relevant news, submit it, and if it is indeed relevant, it will probably be posted!
Posted by the Proteus
We may not imagine how our lives could be more frustrating and complex—but Congress can. – Cullen Hightower
I hope you're right and Linux is the next Java -- Java has now lost 98.6% of it's hype (yes, I pulled that % out of my butt), however, it is an increasingly relevant technology. I have seen many, many of our customers in the past few months move to thin-client solutions for managing entire manufacturing lines: and all are Java-based.
If, two years from now, there is no hype and Linux is just accepted as a viable business solution, I will be ecstatic!
Posted by the Proteus
We may not imagine how our lives could be more frustrating and complex—but Congress can. – Cullen Hightower
/sarcsam on
I mean, what was wrong with fvwm? That bastard Rasterman, why couldn't he just submit some patches, instead of going out and making his own window manager. What's he trying to do, take over the whole window manager world? It's people like him that are going to ruin Linux.
Same goes for Python. And while we're at it, perl... what was wrong with a simple shell script?
/sarcasm off
Sorry, but I just don't buy your arguments. They're making a new "portal" site - great. It'll be another place for new linux folks to go and get information. I don't think that constitutes "going against the community" in any way.
It's really amazing how well you can read other people's ideas and regurgitate them. How many hundreds of times have I heard RH being compared to M$? The plain fact it they are trying to be successful. It doesn't matter whether or not they are here to help linux or become linux because the very nature of linux and the GPL prevents that from happening. Any software they write still gets GPL'd. Do you see M$ GPLing their software? no. Why? because they are money hungry bastards. RH believes in the Open Source Movement and they also believe that they can still get rich by supporting it. I wish them all the luck because every piece of software that they write and GPL does indeed help the Linux community! I may decide to switch over to debian because I don't want GNOME or KDE but not because they are now "evil" because they want to turn a profit.
And Suppose for just a minute that RH succeeds in becoming as succesful as M$. Let's ask ourselves what that would mean. It would mean that RH has created a distribution that my mom could install and use. She won't ever have to learn to compile a kernel or use vi. She will never have to learn about any of the unix command line utilities that I love so much. But she will be able to have an environment that is as easy to use as windows but can run indefinately. Granted this is not the distribution for me but it is ideal for the average computer user. The user that M$ targets. Debian will still be around for us "power users" and RH will never be able to do anything about that. How can any of this be bad for linux?
Redhat is the only distribution I know of that is trying to compete with Microsoft. Do you have any idea how hard that must be? This tiny little company (big for linux small for the PC industry) has the balls to walk up the the industry leader and try to beat them by distributing (get this...) quality software. It very reminiscent of david and goliath. Luckily for RH they are not actually competing with M$. (Do you think david would have won if he'd tried to fight goliath with a sword?) Instead RH has something under their hat (no pun intended) that M$ can't compete with: Free Software. That's our slingshot! Die M$ Die!!!!
My sig has a broken link in it.
Hello, Red Hat, portals suck. They're the hottest thing now though. They're the "push technology" of 1999.
See, as Red Hat pushes it's IPO the want to look all spiffy for all those investors who are really just PHBs but with more money.
The sad thing is, rather than say helping an established Linux info sites along, or simply being a clearing house for some of the more established Linux sites (pretty much like they are now) it looks as though they want to duplicate all that effort and with their massive financial backing try to take over the Linux web arena.
Gosh, how Microsoft of them.
On top of that, it's going to be at the cost of just the basic Red Het support info that their site offers now.
Have you ever noticed how hard it is to find real technical info about Microsoft's products on mocrosoft.com or info on Netscape at netscape.com?
JW
I dunno though, going on the number of times that the Enterprise has been taken over by people locking everyone else out of the computer system, I say that they *gotta* be running NT.
First of all, RedHat has donated resources to projects that help the community. At some level, they do have concern for the progression of the community.
Secondly, the Open Source or Free Software or whatever movement you happen to support is based as much on competition as on cooperation. How many Web servers are there for linux? I can think of at least three. Why? They each offer something different. Yet they compete. Lack of competition can cause lower quality products -- why add new features or fix bugs when you're the only choice?
Also, consider this -- why is Microsoft so universally disliked among the Linux/*BSD community? Precicely because there is no competition! That has lead to buggy, unstable, bloated code. Competition, and the freedom to compete, is the very basis of the Free Software and Open Source movements. (and other orgs like them)
RedHat is a business. Sometimes they will do things that benefit themselves more than the community as a whole. But the publicity and corporate acceptance of Linux that RedHat is responsible for has been, and continues to be, of immeasurable benefit to the cause.
Just because RedHat makes smart business decisions that don't always jive with the idyllic objectives of the community does not make them evil or 'The Microsoft of Linux'. Last time I checked, RedHat was far from monopoly status.
(Personally, I use Debian because I find RedHat overly bloated for my taste -- I mention it so that no one thinks I am some kind of religious RedHat supporter. But neither am I a RedHat hater.)
Posted by the Proteus
We may not imagine how our lives could be more frustrating and complex—but Congress can. – Cullen Hightower