Slashdot Mirror


Extreme medicine: Head Transplants

Ry Jones writes "The Sunday Times is reporting that people like Bill Gates and Christopher Reed will soon be able to get head transplants. " Interesting idea, and as the article points out, it's been a goal for transplant science for the past couple decades. I'd like to have my head meet Arnold's body.

157 of 238 comments (clear)

  1. Who supplies the body? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I mean, think about it. For your head to be transplanted to another body, that body has to lose its head. For you to live, someone else has to die. Preferrably someone in the prime of life!

    I suppose rich people don't care about such issues, though.

    1. Re:Who supplies the body? by jbuhler · · Score: 1

      Even easier... institute the death penalty for spamming and malicious port scanning.

      Time to get out my copy of Niven's "The Long ARM of Gil Hamilton".

    2. Re:Who supplies the body? by neonmatrix · · Score: 1

      i think someone w/ a brain disease could donate their body...

      do you think we have reached immortality w/ this?
      now that we can just get a new body brain disease is the only thing that stands between us and immortality.

      --
      Global warming is good for you!
    3. Re:Who supplies the body? by MonkeyPaw · · Score: 1

      Here's the answer then.

      I get my head swapped with one of the Barbi Twins. I get her body for awhile, play with her boobs, then I get my body back, just in time for her to slap my face (which is now re-attached to my body).

      But would it all be worth it ?
      .

      --
      My studio - www.graylands.ca
    4. Re:Who supplies the body? by CryptdotX · · Score: 2

      People who shoot themselves in the heads will provide the bodies.

      We'll probably see a bunch of people encouraging shutting down suicide hotlines. Promoters of these services will petition handgun manufacturers to advertise to the suicidal. Maybe we'll even see companies that have "suicide services" (i.e., assisted suicides)... all to harvest the bodies for the UKP800,000 operations...

  2. Should that be body transplant? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I know it's pendantic but
    heart transplant -> replacement heart
    head transplant -> replacement head
    Or is it a case of
    heart trans. -> heart moves to another body
    head trans. -> head moves to another body.

    The more I think about it the more confused I get.

    Just a simple A.C.

    1. Re:Should that be body transplant? by Jamie+Zawinski · · Score: 2
      ``If you cut off my head, what would I say, me and my, me and my head or me and my body? What right has my head to call itself me? What right?''
    2. Re:Should that be body transplant? by jilles · · Score: 1

      probably both unless of course you take a body appart and reassemble it using the same parts :)

      --

      Jilles
    3. Re:Should that be body transplant? by casret · · Score: 1

      "transplant" wn "WordNet (r) 1.6"
      transplant
      n 1: (surgery) tissue or organ transplanted from a donor to a recipient; in some cases the patient can be both donor and recipient [syn: {graft}] another (the recipient) [syn: {transplantation}] [syn: {transplanting}]

      Looks like its what you take from the donor given to the recipient. Since most people would argee that identity resides in the brain, you are really giving a body to the recipient. So I would say body transplant.

  3. Great Idea!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Lets convince Bill to have a *human* head transplanted onto his body! He might enjoy the change!

  4. Bah, mere child's play! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Just letting Bill Gates know that i've been doing this sort of thing for YEARS now. So if he wants a new head, i'm willing to cut him a deal. Say, $500 million for a near perfect Photoshop head job - most people don't even notice the lack of a 3rd dimension! Also, I will donate his current head to a good cause (eg, local bowling alley) Tom

    1. Re:Bah, mere child's play! by JordanH · · Score: 1
      Bill Gates has always been a pretty 2d kinda guy. Sounds like the perfect candidate for your procedure!

    2. Re:Bah, mere child's play! by Darth+Null · · Score: 1

      At a net worth of $80 Billion or so, Bill Gates still won't pay more than $5 for a haircut. What makes you think he'd pay millions for a whole new head?

  5. Bionic man? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I wonder what ramifications this has for replacing the weak human body with a machine. I can't wait to have integrated web access and a C compiler in my chest. Windows CE for humans maybe?

    1. Re:Bionic man? by MtnMan1021 · · Score: 1

      how 'bout palmOS, thanks. just think how often you'd crash running one of micro$oft's OS's. That couldn't be comfortable. and think about all the bugs -- yuck. hmmmm-- interesting topic.
      ----- --- - - -

      --
      jacob rothstein reed college
    2. Re:Bionic man? by aether · · Score: 1

      Just have four words to say: blue screen of death

  6. You guys are missing the obvious.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    Hey, why not, after you get to a certain age, just clone your own body, maybe it could be genetically reengineered to remove certain defects like arthritis and diabetes from the DNA and then grow a new body sans head/brain. Then you could just attach your head to the genetically identical body and not have to worry about rejection.

    1. Re:You guys are missing the obvious.. by tzanger · · Score: 1

      a 500 year old woman with a 25 year old body
      ....unpleasant thought


      I know it was a joke, but why would a old mind on a shiny, supple, firm new body be unpleasant? I'd prefer an intelligent, wise, beautiful woman to a stupid beautiful woman any day.

      ... now the fact that she's paralyzed still leaves me with Mr. Right but hey. :-)

    2. Re:You guys are missing the obvious.. by Zagadka · · Score: 1

      Ok, well, *just* do that.

      But could people get really immortal by s/old body/new body/g ?

      a 500 year old woman with a 25 year old body
      ....unpleasant thought


      The scariest part of that post was the 'g' flag... just how many old bodies do you have?
    3. Re:You guys are missing the obvious.. by Kamelion · · Score: 1

      300 years? I saw a PBS special some time ago that suggested the brain, with average deteriation would function normally for 120 years. After that the reserve of fresh brain cells becomes noticably low and senility starts to take hold.

      Of course the environment is a factor. Some people go senile long before their brain reaches 120 years of age due to environmental factors which reduce the amount of viable brain cells in their head. No I don't mean alcohol either.

      Just my $.02 worth.

    4. Re:You guys are missing the obvious.. by awrc · · Score: 1

      I know it was a joke, but why would a old mind on a shiny, supply, firm new body by unpleasant?

      Because the technique described is for a head swap, not a brain swap. I suspect the wiring for the latter would be considerably more complicated. Now conjure up the mental image of a 500 year old head on a 25 year old body...

    5. Re:You guys are missing the obvious.. by nuts · · Score: 1

      sorry, i could not resist... ;)
      you can call me a [beep]ing [beep] of a [beep] beep] if u like.

      ...but you are right, ms & gates is nothing to talk about all the time.

      about that vxd thing: uhm... does that matter?

      have a lot of fun.

      --
      Never make anything simple and efficient when a way can be found to make it complex and wonderful.
    6. Re:You guys are missing the obvious.. by nuts · · Score: 2

      Then you could just attach your head to the genetically identical body

      Ok, well, *just* do that.

      But could people get really immortal by s/old body/new body/g ?

      a 500 year old woman with a 25 year old body
      ....unpleasant thought


      when talking about head transplanting and bill gates, "microsoft exchange" gets a new meaning.

      microsoft (R) head exchange (R)
      with microsoft (R) body explorer (R)

      "what do you want to transplant today?" (R)
      version 9.00, first release (but who cares).

      you plug in the ms-phtu (microsoft (R) portable head transplanting unit) in an usb-slot and the thing is detected automatically. as a multimedia device. the default language is arabian, every single dll is automagically overwritten, but who cares. after half an hour of dumb clicking-around, everything is set up. hopefully.
      you have put your new headless body into the chair next to you.
      you fire up the virtual transplantation engine with a brave doubleclick.


      head transplanting initiated.
      please wait...


      [a window pops up showing two headless bodies sitting in chairs with a head floating from one to the other in an endless loop]

      and then, in the middle of the transplantation:


      ------- 0E ---------
      general head-protection fault
      error in trnsplnt.vxd at 00F0AD:00BEAF
      [meaningless hexdump follows]

      hope you made a backup copy of your head before it crashed!!!


      on a unix machine, your head would have been dumped :)) ... and an fallback process would have installed an emergency head on each body.

      AND...there would be a message:

      please run the transplantation manually.

      --
      Never make anything simple and efficient when a way can be found to make it complex and wonderful.
    7. Re:You guys are missing the obvious.. by Hobbex · · Score: 2


      Well, replacing the brain is dificult because you can't replace the nerves that connect it to the eyes and ears once removed. But, the head transplant requires that we gain this technology (since the spine has to be reconnected - as the article mentions), so the step might actually not be that big.

      That said, I'm not sure I agree with the person who claimed to be fine with a 500 year old woman looking like a 25 year old ("Well, I tell you young man, orgasms sure aren't what they used to be!!")....


      -
      /. is like a steer's horns, a point here, a point there and a lot of bull in between.

    8. Re:You guys are missing the obvious.. by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      Hey, why not, after you get to a certain age, just clone your own body, maybe it could be genetically reengineered to remove certain defects like arthritis and diabetes from the DNA and then grow a new body sans head/brain.

      Hmm...it would be possible to look at your medical history and debug your genes to weed out what didn't work so well. We could call it "You, Version 2.0." :-)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    9. Re:You guys are missing the obvious.. by Field+Marshall+Stack · · Score: 1
      Re: mechanical replacement neurons
      YA reason to hope the Nanotech Revolution[tm] gets here soon...

      Re: head transplants
      Am I the only one who thinks that the only way this'd be feasible is if a stock of brainless clone bodies were grown?

      Oh yeah, and given head transplants, how close are we to being able to revive cryonically frozen people? Not at all closer? A little bit closer? What?
      --
      "HORSE."

      --
      "HORSE."
      -Flaming Carrot
  7. Some questions by chuck · · Score: 1
    • His work on monkeys, which started over 20 years ago, culminated in the full head transplants. The animals survived for more than a week with no impairment of mental faculties before they were put down,for humane reasons.

    Well, enough, but I'm not a medical scientist. Can someone explain how one evaluates the mental acuity of a paralyzed monkey???

    Also, apparently it's inhumane to allow a monkey to live like this, but it's great for people!

  8. Grow one. by Skyshadow · · Score: 2
    You don't need to kill somebody -- just clone yourself a brainless body and move into that.

    The only problem is that you'd have to have some lee-time, say about 21 years (you want to be able to drink, right?) before you could move in and your head would start looking *really* old after a while.

    ----

    --
    Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    1. Re:Grow one. by Harik · · Score: 1
      ... and of course the religeous reich would have a shit-fit about legal "kiddie" porn. Gotta love the clash of science and religon.

      This will be suppressed, of course. Just like "miracle" drugs, you'll have to go out of the country for it.

      Most likely, it'll happen in some third world country where the people don't matter anyway. You may end up with a different body color, but that dosn't really matter if you're rich. (Ex. Michael Jackson)

      --Dan

  9. Re:obSlashdot Post: by John+Campbell · · Score: 2

    You forgot: 7) Yeah, but the real question is, will this operation make my head run Linux? and, of course: 8) F1RsT P05T D00D!!!!!!

  10. Oh yeah, and... by John+Campbell · · Score: 2

    10) Just imagine how many MP3s you could store in all those brains....

    Hmm... you could get a different song stuck in each head...

  11. Re:obSlashdot Post: by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 2

    _You_ forgot
    8) If I get a bunch of heads and stick them all over my body can I turn myself into a Beowulf cl... *WHACK* ow! *WHACK* hey! *WHACK* eek!

  12. The Brain That Wouldn't Die! by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 2

    Better yet, one that was actually MST3Ked!

  13. It was 'I Will Fear No Evil' by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 2

    *grumble* and you had me looking up book-ographies to remind myself of the title ;)

    1. Re:It was 'I Will Fear No Evil' by redherring · · Score: 1

      Gads! That can't be good! Can you imagine a 500 year old head on a twenty year old body. Reminds me of the old Warner Bros cartoons where they slowly lifted the curtain on a beautiful body, only to reveal the horse head.

      Nathan Regener
      Corrective Phreonologist

  14. Probably can't beome common by crayz · · Score: 1

    Even if it becomes cheap and you can reconnect the nerve tissue so you aren't parylysed, there will be a problem:

    not enough bodies.

    Because
    1) not that many people die w/ their body in a perfectly healthy state, those that do would also have had to agree to be used, and would have to be rushed to storage fast. There would be hardly any that would meet all the requirements.
    2) If it becomes cheap enough, there will be lots of competition for a few bodies, and there could be a black market.

    So, we need artificial bodies.

    Actually what we really need is nanotech that will keep you healthy forever like in "The First Immortal" by James Halperin, but that's another story.

    1. Re:Probably can't beome common by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      cloning

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
  15. Not a big deal by Sanity · · Score: 1
    I read this over the weekend, bear in mind that they don't try to connect up any nerves or anything (except those required to live) so you still can't feel or move anything below your neck after the procedure.

    --

  16. Time for some tatoos! by jafac · · Score: 1

    "RICH PEOPLE WHO WANT HEAD TRANSPLANT'S SUCK!"

    (arrow on chest pointing upwards) "DO NOT REMOVE!"



    "The number of suckers born each minute doubles every 18 months."

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  17. Re:What's around the bend by jafac · · Score: 1

    You want to see the next world war? More genocide? more hate? more corrupt politicians? more abuses by greedy corporations? more El Nino's? more boundless human stupidity?

    You want to live through how many more cold and flu seasons?

    60-90 years is enough for me. All the people I know over 80 are just sitting around, waiting to die.


    "The number of suckers born each minute doubles every 18 months."

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  18. Re:Grow your own! by jafac · · Score: 1

    HELP! I'm on BACKWARDS!

    "The number of suckers born each minute doubles every 18 months."

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  19. Re:Futurama by jafac · · Score: 1

    a life of quiet dignity

    "The number of suckers born each minute doubles every 18 months."

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  20. Re:I've heard about this before... by jafac · · Score: 1

    Right, it's sort of like taking the driver out of one car, and putting him in the other car, but there's vaseline all over the steering wheel. . .
    (ok. I need some lunch, blood sugar getting low)

    "The number of suckers born each minute doubles every 18 months."

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  21. Re:old dying rich people by jafac · · Score: 1

    Wow. It would be great to get transplanted onto a black body. Imagine what a tremendous schlong you'd have!

    But then there's all those sticky racial discrimination laws. Do they apply to Mr. White-Head/Black-Body?

    This line of thinking get's really perverse, like (assuming we fix the spinal nerve connection problem so many thoughtful /.-ers have reminded us of, over and over and over) what if people use family members as donors and stuff (for immunological compatability), could a guy get away without paying inheritance tax if he tranplants his head onto his son's body?
    If a guy transplants his head onto a woman's body, which restroom does he use?
    If he transplants his head onto a girl's body, and looks at himself naked in a mirror, is it statutory rape? Takes a picture of himself, is it child pornography?

    Oh DAMN! They didn't tell me that the new body wasn't circumcised! Why didn't they take care of that BEFORE they grafted my head on there!

    Like a virgin, touched for the very first time, again.

    It just goes on and on.

    "The number of suckers born each minute doubles every 18 months."

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  22. Re:old dying rich people by jafac · · Score: 1

    (assuming we fix the spinal nerve connection problem so
    many thoughtful /.-ers have reminded us of, over and over and over)

    and over and over and over and over. . .

    "The number of suckers born each minute doubles every 18 months."

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  23. Re:What's around the bend by jafac · · Score: 1

    The Collapse of the Berlin Wall == the breakup of the former Soviet Union, and the eventual sale of cheap weapons of mass destruction to every tin-pot despot in the world, along with the economic decay causing the death or economic enslavement (by the Russian Mafia) of millions, and the fallout being dozens of bloody ethnic conflicts: Chechnya, Bosnia, Kazakastan, the aftermath in Afganistan, etc. And now China's getting punchy.
    Beginnings of a new space station == Reagan declared that we'd do this Kennedy-esque "within a decade", back in 1984. With the problems with our partnership with Russia, I would bet you a dollar that this new space station will not be completed by the schedule they have today. And the original schedule was 1994, and it was supposed to be much, much larger. Mir was abandonded last week. NASA's budget is being destroyed. Humanity's destination is not going to be the stars, unless we end up hitching a ride on some extraterrestrial slave-ship or something.
    End of the Cold War == (see above statements about the berlin wall)
    Cloning == rich people get to take over the world
    boom of the Internet == (see above statement on cloning)

    "The number of suckers born each minute doubles every 18 months."

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  24. If BG gets a head transplant... by shine · · Score: 1

    what are they going to do with his old head? I'd kinda like to kick it around a while.

  25. Re:Transplants without killing? by Defiler · · Score: 1

    You're thinking of Telomerase, and the number of times a cell can divide is called the "Hayflick Limit." Nanotech is the horse I'm betting on for immortality. Throne of Skulls here I come!
    --Conquering the Earth Since 1978.

  26. Re:dont work by Timothy+Chu · · Score: 1

    Maybe it's because Bill Gates is not a person (he's really the Devil...but don't tell anybody) and nobody knows who Christopher Reed is (it's supposed to be Christopher Reeves). However, I can't connect either (Connection refulsed). Here are the last few entries of my traceroute (not that I really know what's going on) :)

    10 linx-l0.ukcore.bt.net (195.66.224.10) 307.411 ms 299.245 ms 313.913 ms
    11 access2-telehouse.telehouse.bt.net (194.74.16.41) 335.709 ms 316.711 ms 319.043 ms
    12 M007501-News-International.access2.telehouse.bt.ne t (62.172.12.48) 314.523 ms 313.108 ms 309.45 ms
    13 143.252.80.112 (143.252.80.112) 355.574 ms 1203.01 ms 1962.31 ms


    <tim><

  27. They should be happy by dsfox · · Score: 1

    to have such a fine new head.

  28. Transplants without killing? by Riddles · · Score: 2

    Has anyone read the article indeed?

    First of all, after the transplant, the person will be paralysed from the neck down, due to the fact that the nerves can't be reconnected. This means it will only be useful for people that are already paralysed. It will only prolong their life-span, but they remain paralysed.

    Second of all, nobody has to be killed in order to find a body. Normal transplants happen every day using organs from people who died. Why is this so different? If they only take the heart or the whole body? You're dead anyway :)

    Kind regards,
    Mark Wormgoor

    1. Re:Transplants without killing? by Skim123 · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't that be odd, if your loved one died and his or her body was transplanted to your rich next door neighbor?

      --

      I could not justify my existence if I were a turkey farmer. Would I terminate myself? Undoubtably, yes.

    2. Re:Transplants without killing? by synaptic · · Score: 1

      So who is to say they won't be able to reattach the nerves in 10-20 years? An application of nanotechnology (slashdot buzzword #1), perhaps?

      I'm 22 years old. What if in twenty years I just donated some DNA, sperm, whatever they want to start a lobotomized clone (slashdot buzzword #2) of myself?

      When I'm 64 (hrm, sounds like a beatles song) and my lungs and liver are giving out from years of smoking and drinking, just transplant my head to the clone and I'm all set.

      Of course, no one has mentioned the problem of Alzheimer's disease or any of the other seemingly age-related dementia-type diseases. I understand that this is being pioneered to give paralyzed people a normal lifespan since their organs fail earlier but the life-extension option is definetly an option and shouldn't be dismissed.

      Even if they couldn't reattach the nerves, some people may want to live paralyzed than die. After all, death is final.

      Hell, why even reattach the body? Make some mech and put the head and some blood filtering device inside and use what muscle movements the head does have to control it. There are a lot of muscles in the face. Wasn't this the plot of some Robocop movie?

    3. Re:Transplants without killing? by Driph · · Score: 1

      Second of all, nobody has to be killed in order to find a body. Normal transplants happen every day using organs from people who died. Why is this so different? If they only take the heart or the whole body? You're dead anyway :)


      The thing is, for a donor body to be acceptable, the cause of death for the donor would have to be from something above the neck...anything else would deem the body unsuitable for transplant..
      Hmm.. Donor dies of a heart attack. Could a heart transplant be performed successfully on the body, allowing it to now be used for a full body transplant?


      I wonder how long a body can be dead before undergoing a transplant..



      Other interesting black market implications. Sure, yer gonna be paralyzed, but does that really make a difference since you now have [insert name of celebrity idol here]'s body?

      C
      _____________________________________________ ________________

      --

      --
      driph
    4. Re:Transplants without killing? by dirty · · Score: 2

      I think the stuff is called telemorose or something along those lines. I saw a report on it that predicted that within 10 years we might be able to take a pill that would restore the telemorose on our DNA and essentially let us live forever. Apparently this would also prevent alztimers(i know that's spelled way wrong). Your brain does start to deteriorate after about age 20 and I doubt this process would stop it. Someone else mentioned that the human brain is thought to be good for atleast 300 years, so who knows. Maybe I'll get to be 30 for the next 250+ years. I just hope it prevents male pattern baldness too :)

      --

      -matt
    5. Re:Transplants without killing? by Mithy · · Score: 1

      > a lobotomized clone (slashdot buzzword #2)

      slashdot flame #3398427, surely?

      --
      This isn't the post you're looking for. Move along.

      --

      --
      "This isn't the post you're looking for. Move along."
    6. Re:Transplants without killing? by malice95 · · Score: 1

      You are talking about telomeres

      Everytime a cell divides a piece of telomere
      is lost off the end of each genetic strand.
      Once there is no more telomere the dna begins
      to get damaged and the cell dies. At least this
      is one theory of how cells have programmed death.

      Cancer cells do not lose telomeres thus they can
      replicate forever. There are cancer cells that
      have been replicating for the past 50 years.
      A substance known as telomerase can remove
      telomere's but the problem is getting it to act
      on a specific set of cells and not all. Once
      we can create viral agents that do our bidding
      we will knock out a LOT of diseases quickly.

      Malice95

    7. Re:Transplants without killing? by Kintanon · · Score: 1

      It's a substance that terminates the threads. I can't remember the name. It roughly works the way that on each cell division, less of the material is left on the DNA strands, and when the remainder is gone, the DNA strands will be destroyed. In theory, depositing more should be enough to prolong life to extreme levels, but I suspect you'd run into other problems as well... Also, it wouldn't prevent dementia of different types, nor cancer etc.

      Isn't that Telomers?
      Also, I remember some bio-tech corp a few years ago that was working on regrowing nerves and braincells in mammals using some kind of chemical found in starfish.... Didn't hear anything about it after that though. So I don't know if they had any luck, I kind of doubt it though.

      Kintanon

      --
      Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
  29. Two questions by PG13 · · Score: 1

    A) Does anyone have any other source for this claim? Is this what it claims or just hype?

    B) If it is true that we could easily move a head this well and given the fact that we can clean blood using dialysis machines, oxygenate it and maybe even add nutrients how much more difficult would it be to keep a head on artificial life support?

    --
    Marriage is the "pseudo-ethics" that cloaks the messy truth of sexuality in the raiment of propriety -- it's "Don't Ask,
  30. Wait. . . by Passacaglia · · Score: 1

    When Bill G. gets a head transplant, what part do they throw away?

  31. A modification of the original idea... by jtseng · · Score: 1
    When a fertilized egg is created, the egg should be allowed to get to the 8-cell stage and then 7 of them should be frozen in liquid nitrogen. As the egg->person ages and is nearing the end, the brain could be transplanted instead of the head.

    I still think it's somewhat of a creepy idea...

    Today's English Lesson: Oxymorons

    --

    Sanity.html - Error 404 not found

  32. 4nd 5h4k3 17 411 (_)p! by Skip666Kent · · Score: 1

    ...and say "doctah"...

    --
    **>>BELCH
  33. ah, the forwards! by Leapfrog · · Score: 1
    I can just see it now...

    "A man went to a party where he was offered something to drink by a cute girl. The drink was spiked with some pretty heavy drugs. When he woke up, he was in a bathtub full of ice and his HEAD was gone! He had the words 'you're screwed, sucker' written in lipstick on his chest! This is very dangerous, there's a big black market for heads, my husband is a firefighter and he sees this happening all the time!! Send this message on to all your friends!" blah blah blah.

    better heads than kidneys, I say.

  34. This would hurt other types of transplants by jht · · Score: 1

    The question has already been raised here of "where would we get the bodies"? We need to keep in mind how existing transplants (of which there is already a parts shortage) work.

    1: Joe Dyingman has a bad heart. Sally Dyingwoman is going blind. And Bobby Dyingyouth has a failing liver. They lie in a hospital, close to death, blindness, and general Bad Things.

    Meanwhile, Dennis Drunkdriver careens through the night, soused to the gills. Suddenly, Dennis loses control (big surprise) and hits the convenient telephone pole. Because he was in his hot new convertible and strapped int his seat, his body is not injured severely. However, Dennis' head is neatly skewered on the lineman's step sticking out of the pole (I know they're not that far down, but work with me here). Dennis' brain is turned into mush. The paramedics arrive almost instantly, but Dennis is brain-dead.

    Since the rest of him is in good shape, and Dennis' drivers' license says he's an organ donor (as should we all), they race Dennis to the hospital, where he is determined to actually be brain-dead. At this point, a team of surgeons start working to remove the parts of Dennis that he doesn't need any more.

    While this is happening, our three patients get "the word" that a donor has finally been found. They are rushed into surgery prep, and as Dennis' organs are removed, the organs are zipped away to each awaiting surgery, where they are placed into Joe, Sally, and Bobby. Three people have been given their lives (and in one case, their eyesight) back as the last act of a dying man.

    So now we can but Dennis' whole body on one aging or paralyzed person, who will (at this point) remain paralyzed, but have healthier organs. No thanks. That is what I refer to as "a significant waste of resources". Maybe I'm selfish (or just cynical), but I'd rather save multiple people's lives with my body parts than give Christopher Reeve a slighly dumpy, thirtysomething new shell to live in.

    - -Josh Turiel

    --
    -- Josh Turiel
    "2. Do not eat iPod Shuffle."
    1. Re:This would hurt other types of transplants by jht · · Score: 1

      No, no, no, you misunderstand. Dennis was skewered through the _side_ of his head... His retinas were unharmed and just peachy!
      - -Josh Turiel

      --
      -- Josh Turiel
      "2. Do not eat iPod Shuffle."
    2. Re:This would hurt other types of transplants by DrMaurer · · Score: 1

      But, if Dennis is/was drunk, they surely wouldn't want to give Bobby his liver! That would be supplying alchohol to a minor!

      Yeah, I know . . .

      --
      Dan
  35. Ray Milland and Rosie Greer by CoffeeNowDammit · · Score: 1

    Sorry, but a bad movie starring these two entered my mind (which itself could use a better body BTW).

    Post if you got the reference.
    Hint: The Simpsons' writers used it, with Homer and Mr. Burns (snicker)...
    -----

    --

    ".sig, .sig a .sog, .sig out loud,
  36. Screw that by jwhyche · · Score: 1

    I want a new butt, this one has a crack in it.

    --
    I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
  37. Re:Head transplants - Einstein's Brain by jwhyche · · Score: 1

    I heard something about this on NPR one day. I think it said that Einstein's brain is sitting in a tupperware dish in the trunk of someone's car.

    --
    I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
  38. The MInd's I - Hofstadter & Dennett by FFFish · · Score: 1

    The Mind's I spends a story or two talking about the challenges that a brain/body transplant would cause. Well worth reading!

    One problem is that the brain is wired to make your particular body work. It'd have no idea how to send the right sort of signals to another body. Life's a bitch when you can't get the heart to pump in co-ordination...

    --

    --
    Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
  39. Re:Gates or Clinton? by MonkeyPaw · · Score: 1

    Hmm,.

    Monica gets body,..
    Clinton gets head,..

    Sorry.
    I couldn't resist.

    --
    My studio - www.graylands.ca
  40. Sample in a Skinny Puppy song? by deusx · · Score: 1

    Isn't that a sample in a Skinny Puppy song? On Bites, or Remission I think... Always wondered where that came from.

  41. obSlashdot Post: by kuro5hin · · Score: 3
    1) Wow, imagine a whole roomful of heads transplanted onto one large body! It'd be a bitchin' Beowulf!

    2) Dood, wasn't this posted before?

    3) Hemos spelled Christopher Reeve's name wrong. He should learn to write english blah blah blah...

    4) The link doesn't work (oh wait, that one's been covered already)

    5) This surgical technique should be Open Sourced, so that anyone can do it, not just millionaires. If we could all open up the patient's neck and fix any problems ourselves, and submit patches back to the patient, this process would be faster, and more stable. But by having a few "elite" surgeons working alone in a "clean O.R." we will all end up with bloated necks that don't even let us move the rest of our body.

    6) [insert name of any old random unrelated thing] sucks.

    --
    There is no K5 cabal.
    I am not the real rusty.
  42. Re:What about transplant rejection? by ansible · · Score: 1

    The body's immune system would reject the head, necessitating those unpleasant anti-rejection drugs. Immune system cells (like white blood cells) are produced in the bone marrow of large bones but not the skull.

    Interestingly, there's been some recent work on transplanting bone marrow at the same time as an organ transplant to try to eliminate the need for those anti-rejection drugs. Results are promising, but still a ways from being completely sucessful.

  43. Questions, questions by ch-chuck · · Score: 1

    the person will be paralysed from the neck down, due to the fact that the nerves can't be reconnecte

    That's obviously ordinary voluntary motor muscles, but what about all the autonomous nervous system? Doesn't the heart, stomach, and other organs get their impulses from the brain? Or can the heart keep on ticking w/o nerve connection or the brain?
    Anyway, the ultimate organ donor.

    Fantasy: Just keep Gates head in a life support solution in a jar, w/ the support machine needing a reboot every three days, and it comes back JUST in time before the head snuffs, while a direct audio implant continuously reads: "this life support machine comes with no warrenty, express or implied, as to merchantability or suitability for any advertised purpose", Do not make illegal copies of this brain.

    Chuck

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    1. Re:Questions, questions by dirty · · Score: 2

      The heart can keep going for a short period of time w/o intervention from the brain, but I don't think you would be able to live out the rest of your life w/o your brain talking to your heart, not to mention other organs like, lungs, liver, kidneys. You probally could get a pacemaker to keep the heart going, a respirator for your lungs, dialasis for your kidneys, and an i.v. drip of all the nutrients your body needs. I think I'd personally rather be dead than live life like that, but then again, if i'm ever in that situation i might change my mind...

      --

      -matt
  44. Body transplant. by Kierkan · · Score: 1

    Isn't it a body transplant? I mean, I'll always be in my head not in my body, so what's new to me after the transplant is the body, not the head...

  45. Motorcycle helmets by KyleCordes · · Score: 1

    I have seen articles that suggest that motorcycle helmets may or may not be a major benefit in reducing overall death/injury rates, because although the helmet is great if you are in an accident, it also makes it more likely you will be in an accident, because of the greatly reduced vision and hearing you have with the helmet on.

    (Of course, I don't ride motorcycles, so I wouldn't know...)

  46. everyone hates puns by falser · · Score: 1

    ...he had developed a blood-cooling system that meant a living head could be disconnected from its blood supply for up to an hour without ill-effect.

    Wow, now that would be one really wild head trip. It'd beat the heck out of any drug that makes you have an "out of body" experience.

    "The voices in my head say crazy things"

  47. Sick mind by Marco+Schramp · · Score: 1

    Finally!! I've got a sick mind and don't want
    to deprive my body from a good one!

  48. Better if just brain could be moved by Neuroprophet · · Score: 1

    Ok, people have mentioned cloning a headless body, but then the head, after being moved to the new body would look too old for it. Why not clone a body without a brain and spinal column, and then move just your brain and spinal cord to the new body, this way you will have your face matching the age of the cloned body.

    Also, if you went bald in your old body, you could have your hair back for a while...

    1. Re:Better if just brain could be moved by puppet10 · · Score: 1

      I was thinking along the same lines, not only would you have a whole new body but you could use your own clone (plus any genetic modifications you wanted to make and could be specified, i.e. just replace the male pattern baldness gene, once it's found, with the gene that doesn't give baldness) if you could wait the 20 or so years needed for your brainless (haha) clone to grow to adulthood (just start the process when you're 25-30)

      --
      -------- This space intentionally left blank --------
  49. Re:dont work by Black+Perl · · Score: 1

    Actually it's "Reeve".

    --
    bp
  50. It won't still won't guarantee immortality by funkman · · Score: 1

    Even though your head may get transplanted to a "healthy" body, your brain still continues dying as you get older. Granted this may make lifespans of 150 years possible, who would really want to live that long? Most elderly I've talked to and known would be happy to go at the ripe old age of 90. Another 60 years of only having a head with and no feeling in your body may be considered inhumane.

    1. Re:It won't still won't guarantee immortality by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I wanna live forever and the technology will make it so, one way or another.. I want to live and learn and not ever be affected by disease or age.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
  51. Re:It still won't guarantee immortality by funkman · · Score: 1

    Sorry, the header should have read: Re:It still won't guarantee immortality

  52. Head Transplants. by rjsquire · · Score: 1

    Arnold from "Happy Days"?

  53. heads by Jeremi · · Score: 1

    Here in the hall of heads
    You look through the keyhole
    This is the hall of heads
    One step through the doorway

    Roll out that special head
    This is our favorite one
    Please don't try to leave
    Don't leave the hall of heads

    Hide underneath the porch
    Hide down behind the furnace
    You can't run away
    Your feet won't let you run

    You can't get away
    You can't really hide
    Once you hear the call
    The song of the hall of heads

    You can't run away
    Your feet won't help you run
    You can't run away
    Out of the hall of heads


    (written by They Might Be Giants)

    --


    I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
  54. Re:blood-cooling system by sammy+baby · · Score: 1

    You'll need to find the jumper settings, first. They're located near the second and vertebrae, but the effect of flipping them can be reproduced through ingestion of massive amounts of coffee.

  55. Re:What about transplant rejection? by _dim · · Score: 1

    The head and body would of course reject each other, since they'd both see the other part as something alien.
    --

  56. No that's not the best :-) by robinjo · · Score: 1

    Why just take the heart or lungs from a pig? Why not take the whole body? It would be so cool to see Bill's head on Babe the pig :-)

    Ok, ok, some realism, please. How about Bill's head on a 800 pound gorilla?

  57. Umm, that great but... by Amoeba+Protozoa · · Score: 1

    Hemos, that is great butt, I would still like to be able to wipe my own ass. It is such a price to pay Arnold... -AP

  58. Sick by kertaamo · · Score: 2

    I think I'm going to be sick.
    Anyway I would prefer to see Bill Gate's head on a stick.

  59. blood-cooling system by crow · · Score: 3

    Oh wow. That blood-cooling system would probably let me overclock my brain!

  60. An even more exciting use for this technology by Shoeboy · · Score: 3

    Robert J White, an American neurosurgeon, said he had developed a blood-cooling system that meant a living head could be disconnected from its blood supply for up to an hour without ill-effect. forget head transplants. With this device, I might be able to make it through all the meetings my manager keeps scheduling.
    --Shoeboy

  61. Ewwwww by Otto · · Score: 1

    Okay, what's the point? So the head lives longer. Since you can't regrow nerves (yet), it can't move.. I can't think of anyone who would WANT to go on longer given that:
    a) you can't move
    b) you're a freak
    c) you probably stuck in the hospital for what's left of your life

    ---

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    1. Re:Ewwwww by grndcontrol · · Score: 1

      see the above post...

  62. And what do they do with the old body? by Raphael · · Score: 1

    Sure, they have to find a fresh body without a head in order to perform the operation. I would not be surprised to see some surgeons suggesting that the airbags must be removed from all cars. That would provide them with an endless supply of bodies.

    But what will they do with the old body once the head has been moved to the new one? Should it be buried (funeral, grave, and so on) or should it be dumped as waste?

    Yummy!

    --
    -Raphaël
    1. Re:And what do they do with the old body? by PylonHead · · Score: 1

      Maybe you could auction your old body off on Ebay. People who couldn't afford a new body could invest in a pre-owned body with a few more miles on it.

      --
      # (/.);;
      - : float -> float -> float =
  63. My brain crashed once... by Anomie-ous+Cow-ard · · Score: 1
    ... and no, i wasn't drunk or on drugs!

    The alarm clock went off one morning, and none of my higher brain functions were functional. i somehow managed to turn off the alarm clock, and when i woke up again later it had fixed itself (:

    -----

    --

    --
    perl -e'$_=shift;die eval' '"$^X $0\047\$_=shift;die eval\047 \047$_\047"' at -e line 1.

  64. oooo, nanotech! by Anomie-ous+Cow-ard · · Score: 1
    Possibly the first part could be solved with DNA synthesizers (which we've had for many years), but that will require the human genome project to be completed so we can turn the correct flags on and off.

    NAME

    gdna - GNU project DNA sequencer
    SYNOPSIS
    gdna [ option | genome ]
    WARNING
    The information in this man page is an extract from the full documentation of the GNU DNA sequencer, and is limited to the meaning of the options.

    This man page is not kept up to date except when volunteers want to maintain it. If you find a discrepancy between the man page and the software, please check the Info file, which is the authoritative documentation.

    If we find that the things in this man page that are out of date cause significant confusion or complaints, we will stop distributing the man page. The alternative, updating the man page when we update the Info file, is impossible because the rest of the work of maintaining GNU DNA leaves us no time for that. The GNU project regards man pages as obsolete and should not let them take time away from other things.

    For complete and current documentation, refer to the Info file `gdna' or the manual Using and Porting GNU DNA (for version 2.0). Both are made from the Texinfo source file gdna.texinfo.

    and so on...

    -----

    --

    --
    perl -e'$_=shift;die eval' '"$^X $0\047\$_=shift;die eval\047 \047$_\047"' at -e line 1.

  65. Such Immortality in Science Fiction by Mur! · · Score: 1

    When I was in high school and read Time Enough for Love (at least I think that was the correct title) by Heinlein, I thought "There's no way that this sort of thing could ever happen, but what if it did?" This Heinlein story is about an old, rich man with an active mind trapped in an inactive body. They basically transplanted not his head, but his brain and spinal column into the body of a mid-20s shapely secretary.

    The book was an exploration by a dirty old man into the what-ifs of transsexual identity, and not a tretise on the future possibilities of immortality, but the issues raised are pertinant - would you only get a body of the same sex as your own? What if the only available body is of the opposite sex? Is a spinal cord transplatation feasible? If so, it would solve the nerve-attachment problem that would do away with the paralysm. But could you ever be sure of what was you and what was the body? In the book, the guy had the host body's personality riding around in his head, and he died in less than a year (I can't remember exactly what from, but probably a combination of rejection and other things). Is this really a long-term solution? The monkeys lived a week before they were put down. That's definately not a real test for length of life trials.

    I don't know. I might prefer to see Futurama's Hall of Heads before we get (as my husband said) "the attack of the wheelchair bound killer decomposing head creatures." And most kids think it's bad enough to kiss their grandparents on the cheek. Imagine visiting your great-great grandmother - a 140 year old head on a 50 year old body. I just shudder to think about it.

  66. Wait! Some questions need to be answered first. by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

    If you put a man's head on a woman's body, which bathroom should he/she/it use?

    If you robbed a bank and then got a new body, could they still throw you in jail? Couldn't you save your old body and have them jail it instead?

    If your head ran Windows and your new body ran DR-DOS, would that make a rejection more likely?

    Would a big ol' bolt through your neck become a sign of affluence, so that the not-quite-rich got fakes installed as a status symbol?

    Could you get spare heads, like Kryten? Would they be hot-swappable?

    Inquiring minds want to know.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  67. Bruce Sterling and old people becoming young again by aphrael · · Score: 1

    Bruce Sterling did an interesting book, Holy Fire,
    on a related subject a few years ago: an old wealthy woman got some sort of medical treatment which would rejuvenate her body to its early 20s ... and promptly took off, vanished from the world, and became a hedonistic drifter. Seems that
    the rejuvenation also caused her body to get pumped with chemicals that her brain no longer knew how to cope with. :)

  68. Head transplants - Einstein head by Zoinks · · Score: 1

    It's just a little funny to see a /. item about head transplants and Einstein's HEAD right next to it. How about THAT head transplant? Now if we could just find Marilyn Monroe's body...

  69. More info by demigod · · Score: 1

    I saw some of Dr. Whites early work on the Learning Channel. It was some special about the dangers of banning research.

    In 1971 (not a typo) after the first full body transplant, a law was passed (US) that banned research into brain, head, and full body transplants.

    One of the names mention who could benefit from a full body transplant was Stephen Hawking. His body is dying, his brain is not.

    This show was on right after the UK banned cloning research a couple years ago. I don't remember the name.

    --
    "The last thing I want to do is deal with a bunch of people who want something."
    Major Major
  70. I like the idea by jilles · · Score: 1

    Of course with advances in transplantation techniques, it would not necessarily have to be a human body. After all there's already some experimentation going on with pigs hearths and other organs, so why not an entire pig body.
    Quite a funny idea. I suddenly get these visions of these monty python like creatures (i'm refering to the opening sequence animations).

    But even if only human bodies would be possible I don't mind. There's plenty of people dying of braindamage (for instance because of a car crash). While the head in those situation is not much use, the body can still be reused. I have no problem with this. In fact my body is available should such a thing ever happen to me.

    --

    Jilles
  71. yeah, but ... by jetpack · · Score: 1

    ... you *all* forgot:

    9) How much faster will I be able to play q3test?

  72. Re:Frankenstein a reality? by swingerman · · Score: 1

    You're forgetting Bill Gates and ass are in the same species, so it's already possible.

  73. Re:Can anyone here stop thinking by swingerman · · Score: 1

    Ummm...that would be Moses, not a bunch of small plants (mosses). :)

  74. Even if you could get the nerves to reconnect... by Dr.+Manhattan · · Score: 1
    You'd have other problems. First, as I understand it, it may not be possible at all to reconnect spinal nerves; I think several of them are quite long, on the order of inches. You'd have to vastly accelerate the growth of nerves to make it work. Nanotech would do it, but if you have nanotech, you'd have better options than transplants anyway.

    Let's assume you have a drug that lets the new brain and the spine connect up. The problem is, the subject will need lots of therapy to essentially rewire things. One thing might actually help - many learned reflexes are actually stored in the spine.

    A friend of mine suffered a back injury and lost the ability to run. He could stand, sit, walk, amble, mosey, shuffle, etc. But he couldn't run - the nerves that handled the "running algorithm" had been damaged. He had to relearn running from scratch, in his late teens.

    If the nerves could be reattached, and the new brain and spine could learn to agree on signaling (a big if), then less therapy might be needed than one would expect. Still, the subject would probably walk, sit, run, etc. remarkably like the "old" person did.

    It'd be interesting to see what other reflexes might transfer across; I have this image of Bill Gate's head on an "exotic dancer's" body. It's not a good image.

    --
    PHEM - party like it's 1997-2003!
  75. Frankenstein? by xnixnix · · Score: 1

    And then they say: "woops i have created a monster" i was not the monster it was dr. frankenstein who tried to live forever

  76. Re:I've reproduced the article here: (Long messag by Stalky · · Score: 1

    And the nice thing is that the paper goes to bed before the U.S. does -- tomorrow's paper shows up at about 9pm Eastern time.

    --
    Jeff
  77. I've heard about this before... by Zenki · · Score: 1

    And I've actually seen footage where they did a full head transplant on a poor chimp, kinda like the one on that damned tv show Friends. It was research footage from one of those weird University projects, like the one where the professor was in it just for the funding. Anyhow, in the end, the head transplant was very possible, with the problem that the technology to reattach spinal nerves really isn't up to par... ie, after such surgery, you're paralysed from the neck down.

  78. Re:Article by PimpBot · · Score: 1

    There's an article? I thought the point of slashdot was a contest to see who can type "FIRST POST!!!" the fastest...
    --------------------------

  79. Head transplant ? by zmooc · · Score: 1

    I would say "body transplant"...you don't get a new head; you get a new body.

    --
    0x or or snor perron?!
  80. That's it by jammer+4 · · Score: 1

    Ok stop the planet I want to get off...

    This is the freakiest thing I have seen in a long time. I cannot believe that the article mentions Frankenstein at the end. Didn't we learn anything from Mary Shelley?

    1. Re:That's it by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Was Marry Shelly Ada Byron Lovelace's daughter, mother or sister? I can never remember that family.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
  81. I've reproduced the article here: (Long message) by mrpacmanjel · · Score: 1

    http://www.sunday-times.co.uk

    I recommend you bookmark the above site - it is one of the most well informed british papers you can buy.
    You have to register(free) with the site but you do have access to a weeks worth of news.
    The Times is published during the week and The Sunday-Times is published on Sunday(Obviously!)

    Here is the article in it's entirety:

    A life on hold

    Christopher Reeve has shown interest in the new transplant research

    Head transplants give paralysed new hope
    Jonathan Leake
    Science Editor

    A LEADING brain surgeon has unveiled plans to perform the first human head transplant. The operation, already carried out successfully on dogs and monkeys, would initially cost £800,000.
    Among those who could benefit are quadriplegics with conditions similar to that of Christopher Reeve, the Superman actor paralysed after a fall from a horse. The operation may also appeal to rich people with terminal illnesses.

    The technique for transplanting heads was proven in principle with small mammals in the early 1990s. However, it was abandoned when scientists realised that the extra time needed to reconnect larger human arteries and muscles would deprive the brain of oxygen and cause tissue damage.

    Last week it was claimed that this obstacle has finally been overcome. Robert J White, an American neurosurgeon, said he had developed a blood-cooling system that meant a living head could be disconnected from its blood supply for up to an hour without ill-effect.

    White and his team, based at Case Western Reserve University in Ohio, claim they have already practised the techniques on corpses retained for medical research at the American hospital where he works.

    The White machine cools the brain from 37C to 10C. "This slows the metabolism and allows plenty of time to reconnect a head to its new body. All we are waiting for now is the money and the patients," White said last week.

    White has carried out more than 10,000 brain operations on humans. His work on monkeys, which started over 20 years ago, culminated in the full head transplants.

    The animals survived for more than a week with no impairment of mental faculties before they were put down, for humane reasons.

    Head or brain transplants have long been seen as the holy grail for neurosurgery. In theory, they offer the nearest anyone could get to immortality.

    In reality, however, White's technique would initially have a more limited application. Despite many recent advances, surgeons still cannot reconnect or regrow severed spinal nerves. This means that, like the monkeys, anyone who underwent a head transplant would be paralysed from the neck down.

    It also means that the first candidates for such surgery would probably be people, like Reeve, who had already been paralysed. Quadriplegics often die prematurely from multiple organ failure. Transplanting their head to a new body could, however, give them the chance of a normal lifespan.

    White believes that, although the idea might shock the able-bodied, many quadriplegics would welcome it. "It would be hard to deny them that chance through squeamishness when we are already transplanting lungs, hearts and livers," he said.

    Most of the subsequent demand for head transplants would, however, almost certainly come from a group presenting far greater ethical problems - elderly or dying millionaires with enough money to pay for the operation and the years of aftercare.

    The operational procedure, described by White in a paper published last week, would involve two teams of surgeons. Deep incisions would be made around the necks to expose the six major blood vessels and the spine. The next step would be to cool the head by connecting it to White's new cerebral perfusion machine. Initially this would carry blood from the original body but, as the operation progressed, a second set of tubes from the machine would be hooked up to blood vessels of the recipient body.

    Then, taps would switch off the head's blood supply from the original body and replace it with blood from the new body.

    At this point the head would be detached, by severing the spinal cord, and then attached to the new body. Such procedures could mean halting the blood supply but the brain's low temperature would minimise the risk of damage. Then the blood vessels, muscles and skin could be sewn together using standard surgical techniques.

    Reeve, who has set up a foundation to promote research into the causes of paralysis and potential cures, is understood to have taken a close interest in White's research.

    White refused to reveal his future clients but was confident many would come forward. He said: "The Frankenstein legend, where a human being is constructed by sewing parts together, will become a reality early in the 21st century."

  82. haircuts & heads by RoLlEr_CoAsTeR · · Score: 1

    He'd pay millions for a new one because if he didn't, it'd look like he was getting a piece of junk, and he wouldn't want that, would he? He's got to keep up the "good rep." (ha!)

    --

    Insert mind here.
  83. Re:Idea by georgeha · · Score: 1

    I was just thinking this same idea.

    Get a machine to reoxygenate the blood, another dialysis type machine to cleanse the blood, an intravenous feeding solution, heck, we're almost there now.

    Then encase the whole gizmo in a large cylindrical body with wheels, and make the head hate all other living creatures, especialy doctors.

    MIght make a good exterminator.

    George

  84. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  85. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  86. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  87. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  88. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  89. Grow your own! by abba+fan · · Score: 1

    The great thing about this and the development of cloning is that you can live like the doctor says you shouldn't.

    For example, liver problems due to drink. We are a couple of years away form being able to get a liver transplant from a pig.

    Or lung cancer due to working in a smoky restaurant? Again, transplant from a pig or other animal.

    But this is best: just have a clone created of yourself and then have your head put on the clone. Sure, it'll look odd having the face of a seventy year old on a baby but it'll literally double your lifespan. And you can do it again. Why stop at doing it when your 70. Do it when you're thirty and always have a 17 year old version of yourself in the fridge for special occasions like hot dates!

    Fountain of Eternal Youth anyone?

    --
    "Captain, I cannot believe my ears!" - Spock
    1. Re:Grow your own! by abba+fan · · Score: 1

      It gets better...for your old lady's 40th birthday, give her a new body of a Cameron Diaz clone!

      Way-hey! I can't wait for this :-)

      --
      "Captain, I cannot believe my ears!" - Spock
    2. Re:Grow your own! by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Nah.. do a clone, save him when you are (how old are you now?) 22, then every 5 years, hell, every year, get a transplant. Assuming there's no recovery period.. in which case, get one every 10 years.. oh, and either clone the clone or keep a whole lot of genetic material from when you were 22 lying around in the freezer. This is all academic anyways, until nanotech comes along.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
  90. Death of Paralysis... by grndcontrol · · Score: 1

    I just thought that some of you might be interested in this story I saw on the BBC web site. Basicaly the guy who grew the ear on the back of the mouse some time ago has developed an artificial spinal cord using a "polymer mixture implanted with immature nerve cells." Using this method he was able to regrow spinal cords in mice that have had about an inch of the spinal cords totaly removed. If this technology proves to be effective in humans, there might just be another Superman sequal in the works...

  91. Efficient use of the dead by Jay+Tarbox · · Score: 1

    Well, since this operation would require an ENTIRE healthy corpse this would be a huge waste. One corpse can provide parts for a dozen people in need. Liver, kidneys, eyes, lungs, heart. To take that one rare corpse and give the whole thing to one rich guy would be wrong. Not to mention the fact that the new body would start to go again just like the original paralysed body did.

  92. Futurama by Hard_Code · · Score: 1

    So a Futurama world really isn't that far off.

    "The Frankenstein legend, where a human being is constructed by sewing parts together, will become a reality early in the 21st century."

    Why do I not feel as exuberant as this guy...

    --

    It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
  93. They Saved Hitler's Brain!!! by Big+Jojo · · Score: 1

    Anyone remember that movie?

    What they actually saved was the head.
    They were going to transplant it.
    It screamed from inside its bell jar.
    There were lots of Seig Heil!! salutes.

    This article made me queasy. They really could have saved Hitler's brain.

    - Jojo

  94. The Cryogenially Frozen? by QuantumG · · Score: 1

    Isn't this the first step to the technology that the cryogenially frozen chose to freeze their heads for? I believe the story goes: I only need to freeze my head when I die because by the time they take me out of the freezer they will be able to clone my body from cells taken from my head and reconnect it. However, I think a good portion of these people would be pretty pissed off if you pulled em out of the freezer and hooked em up to a body that they had no control over from the neck down. And if it wasn't their own body they may not appreciate it either. This is good news for the people who supply freezing services. Some of these freezing services are paid for by family members who are still alive (usually as a term of the inheritence of the rich bastard who is in the fridge), others were paid for with "insurance" policies.. ie, while I'm alive I pay really large amounts of cash to someone who promises to lop off my head and stick it in the fridge until such time as they can thaw me and out and reconnect my head to a clone of my body. These contracts are very specific. They must be able to restore me to at least the state that I was when I was in good health during my life span. The freezer is betting that the day will never come that they will be unfrozen. These guys will be the ones to be thawed out last, when the technology is really cheap. The rich dudes who's grand kids are paying for him to be shoved in the ice box will be paying whatever it takes to get grandpop out because the particuarly large freezer that he wanted is costing a fortune to maintain. Anyways, I'm thinking about going out and getting a policy.. at least until I have a fortune to leave a long winded freeze-me-wake-me-up will over.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  95. Re:Can I adopt a head transplanted dog? by QuantumG · · Score: 1

    Yer.. I'd be pretty pissed off if I lost my dog to a car and it's head was ok and I went to this guy and said "hey.. fix my dog, he's still alive, but he's gunna die real soon, there's plenty of stray dogs that are going to be killed anyway" and he said no (regardless of the thousands/millions that I offer to pay him) because it's not exactly enough to get him on slashdot. (ok slashdot, but not CNN, ok maybe CNN but his doctor buddies won't think he's cool "pfft.. dogs, do it with a person and we'll be impressed").

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  96. Re:Can anyone here stop thinking by QuantumG · · Score: 1

    First of all, the article said it.. second, it costs a lot and he has a lot.. thirdly, do you think the jews ever stopped thinking about the egyptians before mosses came along? (yer.. I just know that last one is gunna offend.. bring on the flame).

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  97. Re:What's around the bend by QuantumG · · Score: 1

    So what you are saying is that the glass is half empty... I'd say the glass is half full.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  98. Re:Can anyone here stop thinking by QuantumG · · Score: 1

    hehe.. I can speel.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  99. This is all fear to Death by Nahuel+Greco · · Score: 1

    Here, in the West world, the people terribly fear to die, if you accept that you are nothing, die is natural, we not are a individual being, we are a society being, die is part of darwinism. Accept it.

    But, i see the people of the first world countries coming to the third world one to choose a good body.

  100. Stoopid by snubber1 · · Score: 1

    Mabye they detected slashdot posting and shut it off to us. Could happen.

    --
    I don't really mind double posts on //..
  101. Article by snubber1 · · Score: 1

    Has anyone here actually *read* the article?
    ---------------------------------------------

    --
    I don't really mind double posts on //..
  102. Reconnect nerves? by Meph · · Score: 2

    Newscientist magazine recently carried an article about repairing damaged nerves. http://www.newscien tist.com/nsplus/insight/future/svendsen.html Common spinal injurys do a lot of damage but a clean knife cut could be fixable in the near future.

    Meph

  103. Giving or paying for head by Mai+Longdong · · Score: 1

    Hmmmmm, next time you hear someone talking about "getting a little head", be worried, very worried. Especially if you wear a size 7 hat.

  104. What about transplant rejection? by Clockwork+Apple · · Score: 1

    If complications set in would the head reject the body, or would the body reject the head?

    Which is the parasite and which is the host?

    --
    "Doctor, it's not the voices I hear in MY head, but the voices I hear in YOUR head that really frighten me."
  105. Re:brain cells by Rhys+Dyfrgi · · Score: 1

    I imagine creating new brain cells cloned from the originals wouldn't be that difficult (relatively speaking)
    You imagine indeed. It would be more difficult than you think, because every cell in your brain is specialized for its function, and this specialization is reflected in the DNA. Certain functions get turned off, others get turned on. So in order to grow new brain cells, you need to either find unspecialized "brain" cells (if those exist), or take unspecialized cells from reproductive organ (ala Dolly) and force them to specialize in the correct way. Then you need to get a lot of them, and figure out how to make the brain integrate them. It's not easy.

    Possibly the first part could be solved with DNA synthesizers (which we've had for many years), but that will require the human genome project to be completed so we can turn the correct flags on and off.

    And then you need thousands of copies, in the cells. So that part won't work until you can find an efficient way to put the DNA in the cells. Short of re-engineered viruses injecting the DNA, that would probably require a technology with control over very small things which is cheap to manufacture, so you can have enough of it to do all those thousands of cells. So, it basically requires nanotech, as I can't think of any other possibilites.

    *IF* it is possible to get the brain to accept the new cells, and connect with them, then this would be a more viable path than simply regenerating the existing cells, particularly early on in the molecular machine stage, as creating healing nanobots will require time and experience, especially to get past the government safety committees on medical procedures.

    Rhys Dyfrgi
    ---

    --
    END OF LINE
  106. Re:Idea (futurama) by steeljaw · · Score: 1

    What can I say about Matt Groening, besides the fact that he's a genious? Both the Simpsons and Futurama, right on.

    --
    Procrastinators, Unite Tomorrow!!
  107. Mirrored the page by iaint · · Score: 1

    I didn't have any trouble accessing the Sunday Times page from here in the UK.

    I've mirrored it if people are interested.

  108. Idea by Kalil · · Score: 1

    I have an even better idea. Forget about the other body. Why don't we just connect the head to a bunch of machines and put it in a jar. That way you won't even need work worry about a body at all. It could be attached to a little scooter and paralysed people would have the ability to scoot their heads around with brain waves.

    --
    People, their what's for dinner.
  109. Head Transplants? WHAT ABOUT THE BODYS? by Ioan · · Score: 1

    I have read this article and a I can say I was a little curious as to where the hell the spare bodys are coming from? I mean, a young guy wants a new body. O.K., I expect that the young guy wants a replacement *young body* so where the hell will the destination body come from. I mean if the destination body is O.K. why is it dead? And where the hell did the destinations body`s head go to? This subject is a little wierd. I mean Who`s going to have a doner card saying, if anything happens to me, transplant my body. If someones in a car crash, there won`t be much left to transplant.

    There not exacly going to grow a body on the back of a mouse are they? But cloning comes to mind...

  110. Re:will eventually be outdated technology by Ribo99 · · Score: 1

    SmegHead.

    :)

    --
    I wear pants.
  111. Hmmm........ by Blind+Freddy · · Score: 1

    How about we just take away Gates's head, and not give it back?


  112. will eventually be outdated technology by Venebulon · · Score: 1

    why not by-pass this whole messy technology, and develop the means to transfer a person into a holographic projection of their former selves?
    Of course, to avoid any confusion as to who is real and who is a hologram, all the holograms must have a letter 'h' imprinted prominently on their foreheads.

    --
    Why is the universe here? -Well, where else would it be?
  113. Re:Head transplants - Einstein's Brain by IHateEverybody · · Score: 1

    And just to add an extra touch of irony, Einstein's brain wasn't cremated along with the rest of his body. It's still lying around and pieces of get examined by scientists from time to time. Imagine if they had kept it together and frozen it. Once the technique was perfected, you could put it into a clone of Arnold's body. Maybe then we could get smarter action movies.

    --
    Does this .sig make my butt look big?
  114. Frankenstein a reality? by buddah420 · · Score: 1

    I like how the guy likens his technique to Frankenstein. Yeah, that'll get a lot of potential subjects to come forward.

    If transplanting heads is possible within the species, I wonder if it's possible across species; like transplanting Bill Gates' head onto the body of a Jackass...

  115. Good Bill Gaytes needs a head change by Egorn · · Score: 1

    hell I am all for it! to bad the link doesn't work though.
    ----------------------------------------- --

    --

    Movie News - "Entertainment news, bitch!"
  116. Re:dont work by Canuckle+Head · · Score: 1

    up here in the barren north
    we've noticed stupid routing problems
    to the sunday times servers for 2
    months.

    it's so messed up that even the
    genius guys and gals at Shaw Fiberlink
    (ie @home)cant sus it.

    so no sunday times for like 2 months now.

    try a traceroute and see where it dies for u,
    assuming you've got the same problem ofcourse.

  117. Why bother with a human body... by Chester+Cramme · · Score: 1

    Here is another option for quadruplegics to consider:

    http://www.theonion.com/onion3123 /hawkingexo.html