Slashdot Mirror


Mad Dog Goes Underground

Thanks to John Mark Walker for sending over a great spoof video performed by Jon "mad dog" Hall -and given the recent "myth debunking by Microsoft, the linux4u project seems timely. The project is intended to educate the corporate setting about the benefits of Linux. Grab the Mad Dog videos (high bandwidth) here and (low bandwith) here and see what I mean about mad dog going underground. RealPlayer is required.

68 comments

  1. Thank you by jojo80 · · Score: 1

    Thank you for that link :o) The video is just awesome.... and what that guy's saying is, well, true hehe Anyone have links to more such like stuff? *g*

  2. Cool... by spinkham · · Score: 1

    Glad I caught it now...
    How long will it be before a site with a 300kb video stream is slashdotted? Not long I bet ;-)
    Is really amusing though.. Wish I could figgure out how to save it with the free realplayer alpha...

    --
    Blessed are the pessimists, for they have made backups.
    1. Re:Cool... by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, the whole point of real player is to *prevent* you from saving it. I wish there was a MPEG or such avalible.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    2. Re:Cool... by Wolfier · · Score: 3
      There is a program I know that can download files using the pnm protocol. It requires Windows, though.
      (I'm sure that some Linux program for this exist, just too lazy to look for them now because I'm at work ;p)

      Get it at
      ht tp://hotfiles.zdnet.com/cgi-bin/texis/swlib/hotfil es/info.html?fcode=000T36&b=
      Download the .ram file and open it with a text editor to reveal the pnm location.

    3. Re:Cool... by spinkham · · Score: 1

      Doesn't the realplayer "plus" or whatever allow you to save streams? I thought that was one of it's main selling points... That's what they say on their site anyway...

      --
      Blessed are the pessimists, for they have made backups.
    4. Re:Cool... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha ha ha. The PNM server cuts you off when it realizes your aren't using RealPlayer!

    5. Re:Cool... by Wolfier · · Score: 1

      No it doesn't. I used the software and downloaded the high-bandwidth version, it is almost exactly 3 Mb in size.

      I guess I'll take it home and watch it there...(no speaker at work, duh)

  3. What bullshit ! by gupg · · Score: 0

    That is the most lame article I have read on /.

    Its amazing how /. is becoming so big that they are not able to control the quality of articles posted anymore.

    There have been so many articles that have been posted on some topic which was discussed just the day before.

    CmdrTaco, are you listening ? And most importantly are you doing something about it !

    1. Re:What bullshit ! by antizeus · · Score: 1
      I must have missed yesterday's article about Mad Dog going Underground.

      --
      -- $SIGNATURE
  4. This is nice to know... by ShadoWolf · · Score: 1

    From the timeline of e-seminars...

    Oct. 27th
    Linux in Mission Critical Applications - Brookhaven National Labs


    It's nice to know they aren't using NT...

  5. .ram? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WTF type of file is that? Does anyone have a player for it? I'm on a Sparc 2 running Linux, so I'd (obviously) prefer source.

    1. Re:.ram? by m3000 · · Score: 1

      It's a real player file, you know, the program that plays Real Audio and Real Video. I'm not sure if it runs on Sparc, but you can check it at www.real.com.

    2. Re:.ram? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      check it at www.real.com.

      I downloaded every file I could find that had something to do with UNIX. The closest I found was:

      rvplayer: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), not stripped

      That's a file to run on a x86 machine running Linux. That doesn't really help most of us. I could not find a player in source form that I could compile. WTF are these companies thinking?

      Going back to look for specs...

    3. Re:.ram? by m3000 · · Score: 1

      I meant that you could see if they had a Real Player for a Sparc machine. I guess I should have made that clearer. They don't (as far as I know) release their source.

  6. Been there, done that by cowboy+junkie · · Score: 3

    Wow - this has to be the least insightful piece I've ever seen on posted on /. It's nothing that hasn't been said 10,000,000 times here before. It's just wrapped up in an unfunny, high-bandwidth package. I love Linux, but this is just silly...

    1. Re:Been there, done that by cheese63 · · Score: 1

      actually, i thought it was pretty funny. if you don't have something good to say about it, at least be a little more sarcastic and angry...

  7. Great stuff by anticypher · · Score: 2

    But the server is already starting to get slashdotted.

    Check out the fragments of code flying around in the background. Kernel source? Crypto code?

    Now, if only Hemos would fix the post to read correctly. The video is of Jon 'Maddog' Hall, for those who haven't seen him speak (bouncing and handwaving included)

    the AC

    --
    Hemos is like...sci-fi fans;he thinks technology is cool, but he hasn't bothered to understand the science it's based on
  8. Umm this is interesting? by JB · · Score: 3

    Was this video supposed to be funny? It was just some old guy with a beard telling us how Linux is stable and easy to administer. Duh. This is non-news.

    On the other hand, check out the latest Cringley column which talks about the bogus Israeli claim of the 12 ms 512 bit RSA crack. Also talks about how Jane's used /. input to re-write their article. And he says that that was a BAD idea. There's something to talk about.

    JB

    1. Re:Umm this is interesting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can you call one of the pillars of the Linux community "some old guy with a beard"? I thought it was kind of funny. :-) Way to go, MadDog!

      -Steve Bergman
      steve@netplus.net

    2. Re:Umm this is interesting? by DeathBunny · · Score: 1

      Old guy with a beard??? How long have you been using Linux? 3 weeks?

      Geesh! Next thing you know we'll have people on here how don't know who Alan Cox is!!

    3. Re:Umm this is interesting? by vermiculture · · Score: 1

      Ummm....Alan who?

      All these acronyms, so little time.

  9. Why do they require us to register? by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 3
    One thing that bugs me about the seminar: It requires you to register to watch it.

    Why is that? They don't seem to be asking for money - just names and email addresses. If I register, will I get spammed? Will I get billed later?

    Banner ads are bad enough - more spam is a nightmare.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    1. Re:Why do they require us to register? by cheese63 · · Score: 1

      Ah, an email address only consists of 3 letters, an "@", and a dot. it's worth it to hear that guy laugh, i thought that was hilarious

    2. Re:Why do they require us to register? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably because one of the biggest difficuties in Linux advocacy is counting the number of people interested. As for spam, as much as people whine and complain about it, it's easier to ignore and delete than junk snail mail is. All of this complaining is an open invitation for Governments to regulate the internet in the interest of the public good. Besides, occasionally I *do* get something other than "lose weight quick" and "pyramid (I was skeptical but this really works!) schemes". Well, not very often, but sometimes. ;-) -Steve Bergman steve@netplus.net (Spam me. I don't care...:)

  10. Type of video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    What type of video is it? The original poster didn't say, and the file extention doesn't yeild an answer. It's not an MPEG file. So, how do you play it? Is there some sort of console or X-Windows program to do so? Come one posters, if you're going to post something in an obscure format, then please post a link to a converter.

    Also, is there something wrong with broadcast.com? When I request the file to save it, I get the below:

    % telnet webevents.broadcast.com 80 Trying 206.190.46.117... Connected to webevents.broadcast.com. Escape character is '^]'. GET /valinux/maddog_spoof_300.ram pnm://rvarc001.broadcast.com/events/valinux/maddog _spoof_300.rmConnection closed by foreign host.

    What is that? It's not a redirect or the video. I don't have an entry for "pnm" in my /etc/services file. Because I couldn't d/l it, I couldn't run file on it to try and determine its type. Is their server broken?

    1. Re:Type of video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, Real Audio really is not that obscure, and it says in the last line "RealPLayer required". try reading. it really is a useful skill.

  11. Linux4u Seminars are Lame. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I was hoping this topic might come up on slashdot. I am subscribed to receive notice of the Linux4u seminars. I've watched them and can honestly say they are a waste of time. Most slashdotters will learn nothing new. I wouldn't even recommend to uninformed management. But watch them yourself and I think you'll agree with me.

    1. Re:Linux4u Seminars are Lame. by Mawbid · · Score: 1

      It's clear these aren't made for us, but for "them". Still, I think "they" will have as hard a time as I'm having staying awake over them.
      --

      --
      Fuck the system? Nah, you might catch something.
  12. .pnm is a RealPlayer protocol by M-2 · · Score: 1

    It's the streaming protocol for RealPlayer stuff. I'm pretty sure that there's nothing that even pretends to be a RealPlayer for ANY form of *NIX.

    And no plans for one, either.

    1. Re:.pnm is a RealPlayer protocol by _Stryker · · Score: 1

      Well, since Real has native players for several Unix flavors there is no need for something that pretends to be one.
      ---

    2. Re:.pnm is a RealPlayer protocol by Mr.+Piccolo · · Score: 1

      Guess what?

      There's RealPlayer 5, but not RealPlayer G2.

      So we're still screwed.

      --
      Glückwünsche, haben Sie Slashdot ermordet, indem Sie zum korporativen Druck beugten und Subskriptionen einlei
    3. Re:.pnm is a RealPlayer protocol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Real has native players for several Unix flavors

      That's the key point: "has native." They idiots haven't figured-out that unless they release source, we won't be able to compile the player, to use it on our systems. Instead, they waste time making a bunch of different binary distributions. With reasonable configure program, we could all use it. I guess it's time to work on some notes for a paper to feed to ESR on how companies that depend on wide distribution of their clients (like Real Audio, M$ Internet Explorer, and Netscape Navigator are given away so that they can sell more servers) can benefit from wider availability of clients. A well worded arguement could be presented to their stock holders that Real's marriage to Microsoft is hurting the company by limiting the use of their key products. A bonus would be that they would have our assistance in making their player more portable. That's something they probably can't afford to do, because they haven't done it yet. From a discussion with my stock broker, he believes Real will be a non-player soon, because they are a M$ target. The only way I can see Real flourishing is if they gain the loyalty of the technical people who would go to the trouble to install their software on the computers in a company or decide what sort of streaming media server to use when Microsoft will probably make their own "default" standard that is automatically supported. Remember, Real is depending on us to approve and/or install their software. Also, I'm sure someone would make a GTK and a KDE port.

    4. Re:.pnm is a RealPlayer protocol by m3000 · · Score: 1

      What are you using? Linux? If so, then they have a RealPlayer 2 for it. If you are using Red Hat or Mandrake, you have to d/l the beta of Real Player, Real Alpha, because the regular Real Player refuses to work on those distributions. I found that out the hard way. And if you aren't suing Linux, RealPlayer 5 should do just as well.

    5. Re:.pnm is a RealPlayer protocol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eeeh... I click on "Free download" and get this
      information:
      "RealPlayer Plus G2 is just $29.99 with a 30-day money back guarantee.", and there is only a Macintosh and Windoze version avaliable there...

      MPEG anyone?

  13. good idea - talk to execs by CormacJ · · Score: 1

    Personally, I think is a good idea - getting videos out that corporate people understand. It's a good answer to the marketing that Microsoft do, and its similar to some of thier presentations.

    The people that are being used are respected people in the industry and if yiu are looking for a way to convince your corporate ladder this sort of thing is a good way to go.

    The advancement of Linux, especially in critical areas is something thats more needed. People have to be willing to get it publicised too. Without good publicity and good presentations its always going to be seen in the light of the Microsoft FUD.

    Once Linux gets more publicity in areas that are critical it will start getting a wider industry approval, and especially if presentations and seminars like this are done more.

    When I got Linux into my workplace, I won it on the cost argument, but thats not always going to work. Being able to reference seminars like this is always a good thing.

  14. Streaming media by double_h · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, the whole point of real player is to *prevent* you from saving it. I wish there was a MPEG or such avalible.

    This is easy enough to get around. Streaming Realplayer files come in two pieces; the audio/video clip itself (.ra for pure audio, .rm for movies), and a stub file, which has a .ram extension. The .ram file is just a 1-line text file which points to the URL of the actual content. This is so the browser knows to start the streaming media player plugin, rather than having the download the whole X megabytes of content first.

    In most cases, you can just download the .ram file to find out the URL of the actual content, and then get your browser (or better yet, something like wget) to pull down the .ra or .rm file for your archives. Of course, this doesn't work with "live" streaming content (like a concert simulcast) but for any pre-recorded clip it should work just fine.

    1. Re:Streaming media by m3000 · · Score: 1

      I must be doing something wrong then. I downloaded the .ram file, which gave me the real .rm file: pnm://rvarc001.broadcast.com/events/valinux/maddog _spoof_300.rm

      But when I use wget to get it, it tries to think it's from an FTP server.

      wget pnm://rvarc001.broadcast.com/events/valinux/maddog _spoof_300.rm
      --17:57:53-- ftp://pnm:21/%2Frvarc001.broadcast.com/events/vali nux/maddog_spoof_300.rm
      => `maddog_spoof_300.rm'
      Connecting to pnm:21...
      pnm: Host not found

      How do I get past that?

    2. Re:Streaming media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PNM is a special proprietary protocol of Real Networks. Wget does not support it.

      I don't understand why people use Quicktime or Real... Just make an MPEG, and everyone can view it regardless of OS...

  15. Right hand doesn't know what the Left is doing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    This recent bout of FUD took me by surprise after all the WinTux rumors I've been hearing around the quad.

    http://users2.50megs.com/mattwmiller/WinTux.html

    1. Re:Right hand doesn't know what the Left is doing by m3000 · · Score: 1

      And this is what a screenshot will look like : )

  16. Re: Troll by tamyrlin · · Score: 1

    *feeding the troll*

  17. Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What causes this delusional attitude that someone who's referring to himself as 'Mad Dog' would be qualified to educate the corporate world about the benefits(?) of Linux and actually be taken seriously?

    1. Re:Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe if you were even slightly involved with the Linux community you would have a clue. He has been one of the most public spokemen for Linux. Recently giving Keynotes at various Linux conferences. Thanks for coming out.

    2. Re:Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps it is because he *is* qualified to educate the corporate world about the benefits of Linux? If you have ever heard him speak (this video was intended as a joke and doesn't really count) you will know what I mean. -Steve Bergman steve@netplus.net (Who doesn't really want a /. account...)

    3. Re:Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably the same thing as what drives a gun nut who dresses like Obi-Wan Kenobi to declare himself emissary to the suits...

  18. Who the old guy with the beard is.... by DeathBunny · · Score: 2

    For those newbies who don't know who John "Maddog" Hall is....

    He's the Executive Director of Linux International, and a well known Linux advocate and developer. (to give you an idea how well known, a Google search for "John Maddog Hall" turned up 1030 entries. Not many of us can claim to be that well known). According to the www.opensource.org website, he is also one of the creaters of the phrase "opensource".

    Here's his bio from the Linux International web site...


    Jon "maddog" Hall

    Address: 80 Amherst St., Amherst N.H. 03031-3032, U.S.A.
    E-Mail: maddog@valinux.com
    Employer: VA Linux Systems


    Description: Jon has been in the computer industry for over a quarter century, 17 years of that with UNIX. He has been a software engineer, systems administrator, product manager, marketing manager and professional educator. Before accepting a job at VA Linux Systems working full time for Linux International, Jon was employed by Compaq Computer Corporation in the Digital UNIX Marketing group and Bell Laboratories. Before that he was Department Head of Computer Science at Hartford State Technical College, where his students lovingly (he hopes) gave him the nickname maddog. Maddog as he perfers to be called, has an MS in Computer Science from RPI (1977) and a BS in Commerce and Engineering from Drexel University (1973).


    1. Re:Who the old guy with the beard is.... by Bogey · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but it still wasn't funny.

  19. who! by Paul+Jakma · · Score: 1

    he was the guy who arranged for Digital to ship one of their hot new Alpha systems to Linus. And this was when Alpha was still really new (eg 93 or something). Linus did the basic port to it in something like 2 weeks. The first ever port of linux.

    He's been pushing linux inside DEC/Compaq ever since. Mad Dog had the kind of standing to push linux at the boardroom level. So Compaq's pro-linux attitude is due to him in no small way.

    He also been a great Ambassador for linux, and has been an active member of Linux International for a very long time.

    One of linux's more low-profile, but most influential proponents.

    --
    I use Friend/Foe + mod-point modifiers as a karma/reputation system.
  20. Re:Been there, done that? by vermiculture · · Score: 1

    If you don't get it, you haven't been there, done that. To know mad dog is to love mad dog. And you're right. It is silly. So is Linux in it's own ways.

  21. Is this Really needed? by Coutal · · Score: 1

    seems like linux4u definately has a good intention. it also has well-known figures in opensource community and IT world.
    but is it really wise to put it on the net as video?
    there's quite a bit of material on this subject, readily available for viewing on the net.
    i personally think a good collection of several such resources would have a similar effect,
    instead of wasting lots of bandwidth (money?) on videos.
    it's also interesting to note that several of those giving speeches in the subject have written these documents.
    have a look at these few urls, which probably encapsulate what the videos do, at a fragment of the data
    www.linux.com
    www.opensource.org - tech cases, explanation of opensource and businessperson/customer cases
    www.samba.org
    www.redhat.com
    and so on... this is the internet! the data is out there! why send it out on bandwidth-consuming video?

    sidenote: bandwidth is a very precious resource where i live (outside the states), so that's a touchy subject...

    ln -s /dev/urandom .signature

  22. (OT) Re:Umm this is interesting? by Wah · · Score: 1

    hmmm, funny or flamebait...you decide.

    --
    +&x
  23. (Non)-Streaming video by wowbagger · · Score: 2

    What I hate about this stuff is that there is no option to just freaking download the damn video!

    Look, I live in the country. I have about as much chance of getting broadband access this millenium (i.e. before 2001 because that is the millenium dammit) as Bill Gates using Linux for his house. (less, actually). All I want to do is start a download at the paultry 28.8 kbps I get, and walk away. I'll watch the video when it is finished, whenever that is.

    Some things they stream to keep you from saving a copy, but something by maddog? Where's the "open source" in that? There ought to be an FTP site with the actual .RA file, so that we can just download it.

    This is one of the many areas that Geeks In Space gets right: I can just download the file, and listen when I get it!

    1. Re:(Non)-Streaming video by evilandi · · Score: 1

      Look, I live in the country. I have about as much chance of getting broadband access this millenium (i.e. before 2001 because that is the millenium dammit) as Bill Gates using Linux for his house. (less, actually).

      Yay, what he said!

      Us net.yokels and net.rednecks demand bandwidth NOW! I mean, what's the fucking point of wiring up towns for cable TV, teleshopping, multi-user chatlines and home offices when the video shop, supermarket, pub and place of work are on their doorstep? These amenities are often not available to rural users where not only remote location, but sheer lack of numbers, make even subsidised facilities uneconomic. And yet it is us folk out in the middle of nowhere who would benefit most!

      If I had a quid for every time a British Telecom operator has said "Well, if you're not happy with line quality, get ISDN or ASDL", and I've said "YOUR COMPANY WON'T GIVE ME ISDN OR ASDL YOU MORON, I LIVE OUT IN THE STICKS, IF IT WASN'T FOR GOVERNMENT REGULATION YOU GUYS WOULDN'T EVEN GIVE ME A 'PHONE LINE!!!" I would be a very rich man.

      ps. 2001 is not the millenium, it's the bi-millenium, and anyway the calendar is at least 6 years out- according to our current calendar, King Herod died in 5BC, at least six years before he ordered the killing of the newborn. Now THAT's what I call a fucking miracle. Christians, eh? Can we say "necromancy", children?

      score -1000 offtopic, flamebait, etc... :-)

      --

      --
      Andrew Oakley - www.aoakley.com
  24. Names and Faces... by Wah · · Score: 2

    How many other names have you been here done that with that you can put a face to? Or hear 'em talk and move and advocate? I've got high bandwidth. Include movies with EVERY story. Let's make /. even more freakin' amazing. Get yourself a G4, digival video camera, and start making content. Signal not noise. Maybe in a year or two you can be a milly-on-air like our Taco friend, whatever, just quit bitching.

    --
    +&x
    1. Re:Names and Faces... by cowboy+junkie · · Score: 1

      Hey, if someone gets a video of Linus picking his nose and puts it online, should that be front-page news on Slashdot? I've got high bandwidth, too, but it doesn't make this video any more interesting.

      And as for your comment about signal to noise, that's exactly my point. This story was nothing but noise.

    2. Re:Names and Faces... by Wah · · Score: 2

      Sorry, but I liked seeing some of the folks I usually only hear about. It's more of the community side than hard news. I think there's room for both. Keeps things interesting and relates to the people, not just the products.

      --
      +&x
  25. Gee, what version of Linux was the video made on? by heroine · · Score: 0

    Well let's see. Did they use emacs to composite the text? Did Apache capture the video? Did they scale down, sharpen, and white balance the images using The Gimp? One frame at a time or did they edit 130 layers one layer at a time? The only problem is that unless they were visited by an alien race, they had to use NT to produce the very footage which criticizes it.

  26. Video on Linux by rngadam · · Score: 1

    Correct me if I wrong, but Linux doesn't have video editing software, does it?

  27. Re:Gee, what version of Linux was the video made o by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a very true point, though they could have used an SGI or Mac to do the job. Still, Linux doesn't have this kind of software yet.

  28. *Cackle* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This amuses me greatly, that such a 'big man' of the Linux community would go and make a video that I can't even find a player for on Linux.

    ROFL.

    1. Re:*Cackle* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wooohooo...found one! Now I just need to install drivers for this sound card.....oh....wait a minute, I need to know C or something and need something called source code?

      Huh?

  29. Pissing funny! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    roflol

  30. Re:Gee, what version of Linux was the video made o by tomita · · Score: 1

    RealNetworks sells a copy of their RealProducer for linux. This allows you to create audio/video
    content in the RealMedia format on linux.

    http://www.real.com/products/tools/producerplus/ index.html

    There are free and pay versions available with different levels of functionality. Both support live capture and broadcast to server modes.

  31. More Unproven Rhetoric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm amazed at how people throw this rhetoric around about Linux being more stable than NT. Yet, no one can define stable, and no one has done any serious metrics of this claim. It is simply unfounded fluff to make Linux geeks feel good. I personally run both a Linux box and an NT box. Both run as web servers, and the NT box is also a file server, print server, and database server. Yet, I'm constantly having to reboot my Linux box because apache keeps crashing under the load that the crappy Linux ethernet code can't handle. I'm just going to switch to FreeBSD and give up on Linux. Later geeks.

    1. Re:More Unproven Rhetoric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh your lying, come on.

    2. Re:More Unproven Rhetoric by yorkie · · Score: 1

      Oh look, a flock of pigs has just flown by!


  32. we have clues, they dont by discore · · Score: 1

    well ive seen a lot of people flaming this post but i think it is great.
    youve got to remember that most execs dont know ISA from PCI. so a simple yet informative method to get them to realize the value of linux and open source is great. sure no one that has been using linux for a few months is going to learn anything new. but i bet some admins who have used NT all their carreer and want a change are finding it very useful
    the linux4u project is a good idea and probably a little bit of what linux needs to get execs to understand the value.

    although thats just my two cents
    tyler

  33. Why such a video? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Believe me, as one of the speakers in the video series, the video was *not* targetted at educated /. readers and posters!

    It was a marketing vehicle targeted at execs and senior managers. The VA/Red Hat/Linuxcare folks apparently felt it was worth funding. They'll be able to tell by looking at the registration info they collect, I suppose. It was a pretty low-key effort, AFAICT.