Slashdot Mirror


Intel Invests 12 Million Euro in SuSE

Bartmoss writes "Intel and the venture capital firm Apax are investing 12 million Euro in SuSE. Read the press release online. Looks like they want to open up new offices in parts of Europe, start moving into the Asian markets, and do the fashionable IPO thing. "

36 of 107 comments (clear)

  1. The Value of the Euro.. by EnglishTim · · Score: 2

    For those that don't know, 1 Euro is pretty close in price to one US dollar.

    1. Re:The Value of the Euro.. by xtype · · Score: 3

      Although, I suppose I would have been more accurate if I would have sated the exchange rate.

      12,000,000 * 1.019300 = 12,231,599.81

  2. Go SuSe! by xtype · · Score: 2

    Alright, I love to hear about my favorite distro especially to hear that it is growing.
    More good new: 6.3 will be out in stores December first. :^)

  3. It is good to hear that Intel is involved. by ]Ace[ · · Score: 3
    One must remember that a big element in Red Hat's rise into repectability and brand poweress was Intel's initial investment in Red Hat. As a result of Intel's involvement, SuSE could become an European version of the American Linux powerhouse in its own industry. I see this as extremely good news for both SuSE and the linux companies at large. Any investment by Intel (i.e. Apple in the very beginning when Jobs was in his garage...) signifies instant respectability and credibility...

    Please visit FreeDonation.com - You can donate Food and Medicine for FREE to Save Children (You can donate once EVERY DAY). The donation is fully paid by corporate sponsors with the money they would have spent anyway on advertising. There is no charge to you.

    --
    Please visit http://www.freedonation.com and save a life for free every day!
  4. interesting by dothead · · Score: 3

    hmmm, the EU is looking into a ban of the PIII and Intel starts investing in European companies. I guess things work the same way the world over.

    1. Re:interesting by IQ · · Score: 2

      Timing is everything... and oh look, RedHat's stock closed up today +24 3/32 to 167 27/32! Damn I guess the world is realizing it is the end of the M$ era.

      Excellant. Competition between Linux vendors. Just makes that product ROCK that much more.

      --
      Adults are obsolete children. - Dr. Seuss
  5. This could spell doom for the Wintel alliance by jd · · Score: 5
    After Intel's massive investment in Red Hat, it was suspected that the Wintel alliance was getting shaky. But $12 million+ for SuSE is nothing to sneeze at, either!

    If SuSE and Red Hat can get together and do strategic spending (no need for them to duplicate each other's staff & skill lists), then we could see some staggering strides towards the desktop.

    On the other hand, if SuSE and Red Hat prefer bloody battle between each other, we could end up seeing a vicious fight indeed, with these kinds of resources available.

    I guess we shall see.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:This could spell doom for the Wintel alliance by Rexifer · · Score: 3

      Intel's been investing in alternative OSes for a while. Be is another good example. You'll also note that Be started supporting the ia-32 architecture more than the PPC around that time.

      But more importantly, it's pretty obvious that Intel is looking out for themselves... Why have all of your eggs in Microsoft's basket? ;)

    2. Re:This could spell doom for the Wintel alliance by CryoMax · · Score: 3
      As others have spelled out, Intel's invested in several other OS's. It suits their interests -- they realize that if they can get everyone's OS to run on their platform, they can play both ends against the middle. At that point, they won't HAVE to care what OS gets used, they can be assured people will probably be using their processors. Then they can concentrate on what their own marketing and development.

      The Microsoft fallout is probably threatening them a little, especially with AMD's resurging competition. Since Intel was almost completely "kept" by Microsoft, they had one advantage -- they could direct a lot more of their time and energy on development (albeit almost solely for Microsoft's purposes...) and the focus the Wintel alliance gave them is being eroded by new competitors and alternative OSes.

      Maybe we'll see a Lintel alliance? Perhaps. But I think also perhaps Intel would like to simply promote their architecture for every OS out there. And after Microsoft, they'd probably be a little gunshy about official "alliances" with any one particular OS in the future...


      --
      If it's not important, you can probably find it in...

      --
      If it's not important, you can probably find it in...
      Project Galactic Guide (
    3. Re:This could spell doom for the Wintel alliance by scrytch · · Score: 2

      > But $12 million+ for SuSE is nothing to sneeze at, either!

      That's 12 million EURO. Which leads me to ask, what's the exchange rate of a euro to dollars?

      Oh, and how the hell do I generate a euro with this sun keyboard? it's printed on the '4' key, but no combination of hitting/mashing 4, shift, compose, alt graph, anything will actually generate it. What a lose.

      --
      I've finally had it: until slashdot gets article moderation, I am not coming back.
  6. SuSE v Red Hat by Vlad_the_Inhaler · · Score: 3

    This had to happen. SuSE and Red Hat are almost exactly the same size (SuSE makes a profit, Red Hat a small loss) and Red Hat are expanding into SuSE's 'patch' - even recruiting Alan Cox along the way.
    Now SuSE are trying to expand in the same way - this money is to expand their marketing.
    They still have to take the step of 'going public' (an IPO) - this is not a good time to go that way in Germany.

    --
    Mielipiteet omiani - Opinions personal, facts suspect.
    1. Re:SuSE v Red Hat by Alan+Cox · · Score: 2

      Umm I've been working for Red Hat for almost 2
      years now 8)

  7. DON'T FORGET THE 'TEL'in 'WINTEL' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4


    Hey guys don't forget that Intel has a vested
    interest in the wintel hegemony.

    They may be giving Redhat, VA research and Suse money. but do you really want to replace windows
    with Pentium?

    Look at VA linux they have stopped selling or
    developing for any system but INTEL.

    NO Alpha,
    NO PPC,
    NO AMD,

    NO Nothing, except INTEL from VA Research.

    They even have started spouting INTEL FUD about
    how merced will take over the world.

    When these linux companies get bought by big
    companies with vested interests they will begin
    to change.

    We just don't want software choice we also
    want hardware choice. don't forget that.

    So VA Research, and all those companies that are
    making it rich on linux. remember where it all
    came from. And support linux on all hardware possible.

    1. Re:DON'T FORGET THE 'TEL'in 'WINTEL' by Synic · · Score: 2

      Last I checked Intel isn't the only game in town for x86 processors.... I see that Athlon based systems are suspiciously absent from VA Linux systems...

    2. Re:DON'T FORGET THE 'TEL'in 'WINTEL' by scrytch · · Score: 2

      Maybe VA Linux has the best business proposition with Intel? God only knows why they even went into the Linux OEM business. Userbase is a bunch of bloody screaming ingrate armchair CEO's, all too quick to toss aside their Do It Yourself philosophy when they could just as easily browbeat a company the moment they don't bleat in unison to the orthodoxy of every faction. Their philosophy in a nutshell: if you can't cover every last base, profitable or no, you SUCK you're EVIL and you must be DESTROYED.

      --
      I've finally had it: until slashdot gets article moderation, I am not coming back.
    3. Re:DON'T FORGET THE 'TEL'in 'WINTEL' by LocalYokel · · Score: 2

      Yes, because Intel hardware is relatively fast, mature, and inexpensive. I haven't been able to make any variation of Red Hat work on my Athlon 500 system, and I still like AMD.

      The Gateway/Intel deal seems to be dead. Once again today, I must point out this article at The Register to illustrate my point.

      And to be redundant, yes this is probably less than a complete coincidence. Consider that SuSE is German, and the Germans are also turning some screws with the EU on getting an embargo of PIII's.

      I maintain that Intel is a bigger 'enemy' than Microsoft...

      --

      --
      E2 IN2 IE?

    4. Re:DON'T FORGET THE 'TEL'in 'WINTEL' by rbf · · Score: 2

      I don't mean to piss all over your parade, well actually I do :p

      First, Linus does most of His work on Alpha AFAIK, and it's a 21264 too! The Alpha port closely follows the x86 code.

      Second, all of the non-x86 ports are NOT 'niche' projects. The Alpha, PPC, and SPARC ports have active developers! Each are included in the main kenrel source.

      Third, having been on several of the NetBSD lists I would have to say NetBSD is a 'niche' project.

      Fourth, I believe He meant VA and the rest of the bunch only have INTEL x86 chips! Have a look, I don't see any AMD, Cryix chips anywhere...


      rbf, who is typing this on an Alpha running Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 with Linux 2.2.13.

  8. Typical Intel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    For those of you who don't know, Intel likes sprinkling their money everywhere. They will invest in anything that even remotely takes advantage of their goals or bottom line. I work at a wintel software house developing digital video and graphics products and intel bought 20% stake just so we would push the envelope for SSE and their higher end chips. We also get all their new high end chips many months before they reach the market.. :)

    I was surprised when talking to friends in competing companies that intel had done the same with them. It seems they like to get their hands in everything.

  9. SuSE and RedHat by Bartmoss · · Score: 3

    Well I see some major differences between the way RH and SuSE conduct business. RH seem to be a "Linux freak" community moving into the business area; SuSE seems the more mature but "less cool" approach. RH makes minimal losses, SuSE is profitanle. I don't think they're going to slug it out now, as some users suggest - there's a huge market out there, and it's virtually divided by RedHat, SuSE and maybe Debian. They're not invading each other's turf, either - if one company hires, say Alan Cox to work on Linux, it benefits the competition just as much.

    The battle's going to be over who converts the most new users to Linux. That's where most packages are sold, I'd wager, and also over market share in the business support area. That's where the money lies with Linux.

    I'd also like to point out that SuSE is a general distributor of (Linux) software and even hardware.. For example, I bought Civ:CTP from them.

    I'd say RH is firmly entrenched in the US, while SuSE holds much of the EU. SuSE is now doing the sensible thing - instead of trying to compete overly much with RH, they're grabbing market shares in other, more "linux virgin" markets.

    We'll see what happens... I'd also like to see how well SuSE stock performs at an IPO - Certainly not as spectacular as redhat, but I'd predict growth nonetheless... Afterall SuSE does make profits in addition to beingon the top of the Linux wave .. ;)

    1. Re:SuSE and RedHat by arnim · · Score: 2
      redhat just opened an office in germany, but they don't get anywhere until they get one thing done:ISDN.

      i just looked in the redhat-sollution-db for ISDN: 2 hits, the best was from 9/14/99, lots of URLs where to find help on the net.

      ISDN-setup is in SUSEs YAST for years. nearly every german company has ISDN, most linux-users are "power-users" => have ISDN at home. (it's just lots more common here than in the US )

  10. Good And Bad by z84976 · · Score: 4

    This is good because it will help a lot of R&D happen a lot faster than it otherwise would have, but at what cost?

    I use SuSE pretty much exclusively, and I love it. When the Athlon first came out, the SuSE boot disk wouldn't work with it. SuSE very quickly posted an Athlon-compatible boot disk on their web site. Do you think Intel's investment will prod SuSE to ignore AMD? I think Intel makes fine products, but if these investments are just their way of discouraging software support for their competitors' products... well, they will have to be stopped. They've proven beyond any doubt this year that they no longer hold their #1 Chip Company position by superior products; strongarm tactics and (semi-)empty threats are their new modus operandi. I'm buying an Athlon soon because I want the best for my next x86 PC, and if SuSE backs down on support for it I'll be cancelling my subscription and going back to Slackware...

  11. I'm not so sure by DanaL · · Score: 4

    It seems to me that Intel investing in other OSes is almost old hat. Not only did then send money RedHat's way, the sent Intel engineers over to Be Inc. in order to help them with the port of BeOS to x86 platform.

    Mind you, that was also before Linux was generally considered a serious threat to Windows.

    Dana

  12. SuSE IPO ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    The name of the company on the press release is SuSE Linux AG !
    AG = Aktien Gesellschaft and Aktie = Stock
    However I can't find them listed on the German stock exchanges. Is it possible to be an AG but not being publicly traded ?
    The website still refers to the company as SuSE GmbH (corporation with limited liability).

    1. Re:SuSE IPO ? by mha · · Score: 3

      SuSE AG is a holding. It contains several sub-companies (as "GmbH"s), one of the SuSE Press, another one is SuSE Inc. (SuSE Oakland, California), and so on. Shares of a company that is based on stock don't have to be traded publically. You can found your own "AG" and own 100% of the stock. Only some "AG"s are traded publically. Should be the same in the US.
      --
      Michael Hasenstein
      http://www.csn.tu-chemnitz.de/~mha/

  13. Choaking the market? by Rexifer · · Score: 2

    Intel is investing in every alternitive to Microsoft out there... Be, the Linux distros... Obviously they're attempting to spread their installed user base around multiple OSes. After all, their livelyhood kind of depends on Microsoft, which puts them in an awkardly dependant position. The name "Wintel" probably causes them cringe, I'd bet.

    But, my question is, are they doing more harm than good? They want the intel seed sewn pretty much everywhere there's installed desktop, regardless of OS. But, if the average consumer is faced with a dozen Linux variants and a handful of other alternative operating system... They're going to run to what they know. And that puts us back into obscurity.

    Betting on everyone never really wins big.

  14. Read your own comments! by Dacta · · Score: 2

    Your point is that Intel wants to sell more Intel chips, right? Duh!

    The don't really care if Windows or anything else runs on it.

    They fact is that Linux on Intel runs very well, thankyou very much!

    Sure, AMD is making big improvements, but they don't have a great choice in motherboards yet, and they aren't that much cheaper than Intel at the same performace level - and Intel can do better multiprocessing (because of the motherboard situation) at the moment.

    Maybe one day that IBM PowerPC standard will make an impact, but until then for Price/Performance Intel kicks butt.

    Mercard will be nice, too - when it arrives. It will be cheap because of the huge number that will be produced, and Intel needs Linux to run on it quickly so they can get a lot of early adopters to use (and test!) it.

    Even Colbolt is leaving MIPS to move to Intel because of the better performance for the money.

    Sure, we want hardware choice, but don't get mad at Intel for making pretty good products and trying to sell them. (PIII serial number excluded, of course)

    --Donate food by clicking: www.thehungersite.com

    1. Re:Read your own comments! by Dacta · · Score: 2

      Maybe you are right, but I'd like to see the source - otherwise I might suspect you are just making this up.

      Anyway, Intel sued MB manufactures for making multiprocessing MB? One word Why? You can't just sue someone, you know - you do need a reason.

      --Donate food by clicking: www.thehungersite.com

    2. Re:Read your own comments! by CryoMax · · Score: 2
      Uh... Gateway is going to be offering the Athlon 700 MHz processor in their computers. See C|Net News.

      Motherboard availability for AMD is probably simply because Intel architecture has dominated, and manufacturers don't yet see a profitable cost/benefit tradeoff for retooling or expanding to incorporate the AMD stuff (AMD's using what, Slot A stuff? Intel's Slot 1? I forget, but know they're different.)

      The lawsuit Intel filed against Via (See story on C|Net) is about licensing agreement violations and patent infringement, and doesn't actually have anything to do with AMD.


      --
      If it's not important, you can probably find it in...

      --
      If it's not important, you can probably find it in...
      Project Galactic Guide (
    3. Re:Read your own comments! by Dacta · · Score: 2

      Sorry for the spelling error.. It was a mistype.

      Your point about running IA32 code is good, but invalid here - we have the code, don't forget!

      As for Mercad being only for servers - maybe for the first year, but not much after that.

      --Donate food by clicking: www.thehungersite.com

  15. hihi by arnim · · Score: 2
    funny to read: Intel is investing in SuSE because we want to encourage the diffusion of Linux on Intel-based computers in Europe

    vs.
    SuSE will use the investments to set up new sales and support offices worldwide.

    and "worldwide" in this case probably doesn't mean europe :)

  16. SuSE, consider spending some $$$ on tech support by Anonymous+Bullard · · Score: 2

    Once upon a time I picked a retail copy of SuSE Linux 6.1, largely because it happened to carry a large number of "latest versions" to be had on CD(s).

    After installation I was confronted by a bug in their kppp implementation and after a quick look at newsgroups didn't offer any solutions at the time I decided to take advantage of their free 60-day tech support and dropped them an email. After several days I received an automated reply saying they'd be getting back to me soon. That 60 days is distant history and the only thing I've received from SuSE since my support enquiry has been a promotional leaflet that arrived by snail-mail.

    I could have made an effort trying to figure out the solution to my problem by myself and then helping others struggling with the same bug but I was counting on SuSE to follow through with their promised support feedback. Meanwhile I kept booting to another fully functional Linux distro, got another upgrade to that and eventually realized SuSE 6.1 wasn't worth the space it was occupying any more.

    I'm sure many people received the tech support from SuSE that they paid for so I'd appreciate hearing some success stories from satisfied SuSE users. Does their email support work or did you have to fax or phone them to get an answer?

    Personally I would have been satisfied with any kind of non-automated reply but getting totally ignored left a little sour taste in my mouth. As Linux moves closer to attracting Windows users and even absolute newbies the question of tech support will become an issue of vital importance. While I know how to navigate the Linux documentation sites and newsgroups I want to be able to recommend a well-supported distribution to anyone interested in trying out Linux. Every company selling Linux packages with support should keep their end of the bargain or we'll see lots of disgruntled newbies turning their backs to our platform for good. I'm afraid we might even see the MS-friendly press making a big issue of shortcomings in Linux' tech support and to many readers any Linux is Linux is Linux.

    --

    Should invading one's peaceful neighbours be opposed, or rewarded with trade deals?

  17. Suse (and Mandrake) are scared by Corel by cbraescu · · Score: 2

    Suse is profitable while Redhat isn't. OK. The problem is Suse is more on commercial (=retail) side as oposed to Redhat (which business model looks more and more like a mix between Netscape and Oracle). Suse is competing with Caldera, Mandrake and Corel. As a matter of fact, within two years I doubt Suse or Caldera will exist on the retail, which will belong to Corel. Corel is one of the few software houses that really understand how retail business should be done. Conclusion: this investment is welcomed because it fuels them before the desktop and retail battle starts. Nevertheless the summ is too small in order to build a strong product AND company. It is not too late, but it's too little.

    --
    -- We provide Zope consulting from US$ 25 hourly!
  18. Intel & VC? by sufi · · Score: 2

    Hmm - just a few articles ago there was a story about the EU putting an embargo on intel... surely that doesn't bode well for the SuSE investment, SuSE being a German company and all.

    This could get interesting... maybe one big mess?

    The timing is empecable, is this really a good thing??

  19. Let's look at WHY they're doing this! by ComStar · · Score: 3

    Ok, I look at these posts and I see a problem. It seems everyone is all happy that suse is getting money, etc. However, I would like to point out that Intel is possibly going to be under an embargo to Europe - this very story was posted earlier today. Doesn't that seem a little strange?

    If you don't see the connection, then think about how many hihg-tech jobs would be created if Intel were to open multiple software offices in Europe. These jobs would be filled by Europeans (not tiny green men, against popular belief). Goverments LIKE high-tech jobs because they pay well (more taxes for the government to collect), very low pollution (less for the government to spend), and make people happier as well. SO, how inclined do you think Intel would be to actually open these offices if their own product was unable to be sold in Europe?

    They say the world is run by money. They're right. I don't like the PIII serial number. All my systems will not have PIIIs in them - besides, the athlons are proving themselves to be better. And I can't wait till the upgradeable ones come out! To be able to upgrade my own L1 cache - and up to 8MB! Woohoo!

    --
    -ComStar
  20. Just a quick reminder............ by MAXOMENOS · · Score: 2

    ...that Penguin Computing still sells AMD systems; Compaq sells Alphas running Linux; Apple still sells PowerPC systems that are Linux-compatible; and that you can still by SPARC stations from Sun or for cheap from many auction houses and hardware resellers.


    The Kulturwehrmacht

  21. Re:Euro symbol by cybaea · · Score: 2

    Grrr, I hate /. software! The last line should have started:

    Many browsers accept € (€).

    Whatever you do: don't use 'preview' in submissions with & in them.

    --
    Hi!