Slashdot Mirror


'Electrohippies' Protest WTO

creativemeans writes "Yahoo! is running a story on electro hippies plotting to sabotage the WTO. Actually I'm just curious if anybody has a link to the electrohippie site. The idea is pretty revolutionary I guess, but I've considered the Internet the battle ground for freedom for a long time already. Maybe the next century will be like the 60s, but nobody will replace Jimi." Update by RM: Slur was the first to send in the electrohippies URL. Thanks!

228 comments

  1. Rob, at best you were in diapers in the 60's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    You WAY TOO YOUNG TO REMEMBER DUDE!

    The 60's represent something that you could not possibly understand unless you were there

    Stop trying to be a smartie.

    1. Re:Rob, at best you were in diapers in the 60's by ArtPepper · · Score: 1

      I was there, but I don't remember much of it. I do know that I don't want to relive it though.

    2. Re:Rob, at best you were in diapers in the 60's by Tideflats · · Score: 1

      Living through something may impart special knowledge, but it doesn't mean that one automatically becomes an authority. I lived through the '60s, was exposed to both the positive and negative of the decade, and can't claim that I "understand" them, in any way than marginally more than I understand the '40s, when I was an infant, the '30s, which were before my time, or 1776. Rob wasn't around in the '60s. So what?

    3. Re:Rob, at best you were in diapers in the 60's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *Snort* All the sixties represent to me is a generation of spoiled brats who never grew up.The Ex-hippies are the first link in the daisy chain of dunces whose failed ideas have brought us all to the brink of the abyss They partied it up and left everyone else to clean up the mess and pick up the tab. Screw the Sixties and screw the hippies.

    4. Re:Rob, at best you were in diapers in the 60's by erlenic · · Score: 2

      If you had read his bio (click on his name at the top of the article), you would have read this

      In 1960 he was, at one point, the second-youngest licensed amateur radio operator in the United States.

      If he was old enough to figure out a ham radio and get a license for it, (my guess is six at the absolute youngest, but most likely older) then he most certainly is old enough to remember a lot more than you are assuming.

    5. Re:Rob, at best you were in diapers in the 60's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are spoiled brats in every generation. Take, for instance, the present bunch of adolescents. Whatever. Blame it on something else. That's right! It was them thar people's fault. I didn't do it. Nope.

    6. Re:Rob, at best you were in diapers in the 60's by periscope · · Score: 1

      You're a complete tw*t aren't you? I wasn't alive in the sixties, this does not mean that I don't appreciate what it was about. There are many religious people out there who will tell you that the Christian/whatever faith has been around for thousands or years and yet it is still followed religiously. Nobody alive remembers the founding of many modern day faiths that date back thousands of years and yet if you were to walk into a place of spiritual gathering (church, mosque, temple, etc.) then you would be in for heavy criticism if you attempted to tell them that they had no idea what they were doing simply because they didn't witness the events first hand. Another point: Do you vote? you don't sit in parliament watching everything that goes on do you? no. In fact you will accept a certain amount of imformation from third parties when deciding who/what to support without even witnessing events first hand. With the kind of resources availalbe in this modern day and age it is not necessary to attend every event or witness every "revolution" to understand what it was about. Once again, you are a tw*t and now I must stop wasting time replying to ACs.

      --
      http://www.jonmasters.org/
  2. Definition please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what constitutes an "electro hippie"?

    - Too lazy to register...

    1. Re:Definition please... by Steepe · · Score: 1

      They want rules in place to make everyone "equal" and everything "fair" So that it doesn't matter how hard you work, or how much you train or study, you will never ever get ahead of anyone else. Hence no one does much of anything. There will be no reason for freedom of information, because no one will have any reason to collect information or distribute information.

      Looked at this way... If say Linus's programming skills being improved would not have increased his employability (is that a word?), or his standing within a community, or for whatever reason he was studying programming, would he have bothered to write Linux? Why? He doesn't need the programming skills to get a job, he doesn't need the better os to work better and faster, so whats the point. May as well go for a soda, rather than bother writing a kernel. Same difference, same end result.

      Free open source web page/mailing list hosting. see http://www.cnhtech.com/ossoffer.html for details.

      --
      Just three more hours seapeople and you can finally take me away from this crappy God Damned planet full of hippies
    2. Re:Definition please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Boy are you stupid. That's such a typical American viewpoint - that you should only work and produce because it will make you rich and successful.

      The reason why socialism has been much more successful elsewhere isn't because the rest of the world is less developed or full of tyrants, but because we CARE about other things than wealth and simple pleasures.

  3. Stopping information flow is not the way to go by Epeeist · · Score: 1

    The thing about the WTO and similar organisations is the pathological secrecy that they operate under.

    Rather than close down the limited information flow it would be better to distribute the sub rosa stuff that they keep secret. The McLibel sites are a good example of this working (to some extent at least).

    1. Re:Stopping information flow is not the way to go by pvente · · Score: 1

      I agree somewhat....Using the internet to stop the flow of information is contrary to the ultimate goal of the 'electrohippies', it would seem. Use the internet to expose them if you don't like them. Stopping information from getting out of the conference just seems like a nuisance job, with no lasting effect - ultimately a waste of time and effort.

    2. Re:Stopping information flow is not the way to go by Bearpaw · · Score: 3
      I think the argument is that what the WTO releases is not information but disinformation. To whatever extent that's true, then blocking it is arguably not contrary to either the goals of the electrohippies, nor to the more general "information wants to be free" ethic. (Though I believe that in general countering disinformation is better than blocking it.)

      Of course, the ultimate goal of public protests -- whether like this or with more traditional methods -- is to raise awareness of opposing views ... which this has already done.

    3. Re:Stopping information flow is not the way to go by Ed+Avis · · Score: 2

      It seems to me that if you shut down other people's web sites, you automatically become the bad guy. Whether you are in the right or not, if you go around harassing others who are trying to distribute information (whether by lawsuits, or by cracking their server), you come out looking like the guilty party.

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    4. Re:Stopping information flow is not the way to go by gadders · · Score: 1

      The WTO is not some sort of secret organisation, like SMERSH or something! It's a force for good. Read an economics text book and wise up.

      I'm not sure what McLibel had to do with the WTO either. Unless it would be "useless wasters sponging off state handouts try to attack the USA by pretending to be for the environment." (I'm British by the way)

      If you don't the the WTO, raise it with your elected government representative that forms a part of the organisation.

    5. Re:Stopping information flow is not the way to go by Stalky · · Score: 1

      It _is_ contrary to the "information wants to be free" ethic. The whole point of that ethic is that it allows the reader to see all the facts necessary to make the decision _for_ _himself_ about which is the "information" and which is the "disinformation".

      --
      Jeff
    6. Re:Stopping information flow is not the way to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Information, of course, doesn't "want" anything. Information is not a willful agent. It isn't an agent at all, really.

      So "Information wants to be free" is just a meaningless phrase, based on ignorance and bad use of language.

      'Nuff said.

    7. Re:Stopping information flow is not the way to go by Bearpaw · · Score: 2
      It _is_ contrary to the "information wants to be free" ethic. The whole point of that ethic is that it allows the reader to see all the facts necessary to make the decision _for_ _himself_ about which is the "information" and which is the "disinformation".

      All other things being equal, that would be true. But they aren't, so it ain't. It's just not that simple in the Real World.

      In some contexts -- and arguably in the context of the WTO and spreading corporatism -- information can be effectively driven out by disinformation. Information may want to be free, but just releasing it into the wilderness doesn't mean that it will be free.

      Again, in general I think it's better in the long run if disinformation is simply countered by information. But I have no illusions that it always works best that way.

    8. Re:Stopping information flow is not the way to go by jgibson · · Score: 1

      So it's bad to block information, but if ou define it as disinformation, then it's okay?

      This reminds me of an old Peanuts cartoon: Charlie Brown comes upon Lucy squashing a bug and says "I thought your philosophy was "Live and let live.'"

      Lucy thinks about it a second and replies, "He wasn't really *living*."

    9. Re:Stopping information flow is not the way to go by barleyguy · · Score: 1

      "Hey sheep! If you want to get out of the pen, you need to talk to the sheepherder."

      Yeah, right.

      --
      --- "So THAT's what an invisible barrier looks like!" - Time Bandits
  4. Address... by mjphil · · Score: 1

    They're at: http://www.gn.apc.org/pmhp/ehippies/

    1. Re:Address... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever heard of the &lta href="www.isuck.com"&gt&lt/a&gt tag?! Save all of us lazy point and clickers a little work next time and use it!

    2. Re:Address... by HP+LoveJet · · Score: 1

      That's pretty funny. Especially the "isuck" part. Give an AC enough rope....

      spawn_of_yog_sothoth

      --
      spawn_of_yog_sothoth
  5. Robin wore in diapers in the 60's? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Must have been a Hippy sect that didn't catch on...

    Robin Miller =/= Rob Malda, wiseguy.

  6. To quote the ubiquitous quote... by Mandoric · · Score: 2

    "If you remember the '60s, you obviously weren't there"

  7. Re:The 60s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lets see...

    It represented a bunch of middle class white kids taking drugs and "rebelling" that led to the diseffective marriges that screwed over alot of the kids that are now in thier 20s and early 30s.

    The 60s bah. Only good thing to come out of the 60s were the Internet and the spacerace.

  8. it's all about intellectual property by emmons · · Score: 1

    Although I'm not as paranoid about the WTO meeting as others are I do think many countries will try to hurt the US in the technology sector. They always do, after all the has become WTO more about the little guys banding together against the more powerful countries for the sake of trade (unofficially of course), and the bigger countries take part because they're scared about the little guys cutting off the flow of cheap labor. The big guys I'm talking about are the EU, Japan and the US. Everyone has something to gain if the US's technology exports are limited, except the US of course. The US may go along with it because we can't stand to not get our Nikes from Taiwan at $1.50 a pair. Remember, the US has delegates there too. Some of them even try to protect US industries. (those that don't get campaign money from china, that is)

    The biggest problem the US has at this meeting is over that of intellectual property. Over the last 30 years or so the US has become less of the industrial powerhouse it once was, relying more on sales of ideas. Or at least improved copies of things. The problem there is that the WTO hasn't really dealt with this yet (as much as they should at least) and the little guys find it as another way to get what they want from the big guys... mainly the US. The EU and Japan are against the US here too, because their tech industries would like a shove right now.

    Some delegates to the WTO want incredibly broad rights to intellectual property. Of course they do, patents = money. Who doesn't want money?

    -----

    --
    Do you even know anything about perl? -- AC Replying to Tom Christiansen post.
    1. Re:it's all about intellectual property by kentt · · Score: 1

      Actually, the United States pharmasectical and technology lobbies were instrumental in pressing for the negiotiation of TRIPS (Trade Related-Aspects in Intellectual Rights Agreement) in the Uruguay Round in 1995

      In the final analysis TRIPs is actually very good for US technology exports, as it requires WTO nations to conform to arbitration resulting from IP disputes.

      In fact, as China gains entry into the WTO, US technology interests will have broader power to enforce disputes over intellectual property in a nation renowned for its flagrant abuse of patent abuse.

      TRIPs and the WTO are far from perfect, but I would argue that in the final analysis they are beneficial to U.S. technology interests

    2. Re:it's all about intellectual property by slashTadhg · · Score: 1

      The US, at least US industry, is not who you should be worrying about when thinking about the WTO. The WTO is there pretty much to serve their interests, as should be evident from its makeup (any democratically elected delegates, apart from heads of state? anyone not representing corporate interests sitting on the various boards that settle 'trade disputes'?)

      The real worries (apart from intellectual property, which I'll get to in a moment) concern wages, health regulations, working conditions, child labor and environmental damage. Any protections that countries attempt to set up in these areas will be struck down by the WTO as 'trade restraints'. It's a lowest-common-denominator situation. If the EU has more effective regulations governing, say, car engine emissions, the US can claim that these regulations make things more difficult for American car manufacturers, and that therefore they constitute a trade barrier. And the WTO will tell the EU to lower their standards. Ditto health regulations, minimum wage legislation, etc. Things haven't quite gotten this bad _yet_, but that's where they're going (the WTO wants to resurrect the MAI - here's a quick link on that: http://mai.flora.org/mai-info/). That's why the protesters are there.

      Now, 'intellectual property' is a concept protected by the US because, as emmons noted, the US leads with 'ideas' - like software, and the entertainment industry. Being a leader in these industries, it wants (or rather, deep-pocketed companies want) to extend the protection of these industries. I said 'protection' because it is protectionism, disguised behind 'intellectual property' concerns... many articles on /. have demonstrated that 'intellectual property' is being warped beyond its original intent (to ensure that entities that come up with ideas are able to recoup their investment in doing so, and make some profit) to simply ensure that certain (American) companies can indefinitely rely on their cash cows (like Mickey Mouse et al).

      It's not about 'free trade'. It's about the various big players in the global market angling to set the rules to their advantage. What's different about the WTO is that it's allowing them to set the rules without much reference to little things like democracy or what might be best for everybody. If we allow them to do this, things will only get worse for the vast majority of the planet's population.

    3. Re:it's all about intellectual property by Stalky · · Score: 1

      The WTO cannot strike down laws that "concern wages, health regulations, working conditions, child labor and environmental damage", except where those laws prohibit the import of certain goods. For example, the WTO has the power to say that you must allow the import of goods produced with child labor, but it has not an iota of power to say that you must allow goods to be produced with child labor in your own country. In fact, the WTO has no power at all, if a country chooses to withdraw from it rather than be forced to allow unacceptable imports.

      --
      Jeff
  9. Stopping power flow is the way to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The real problem with the WTO is that it's a world government. If they adopt bad laws there's no place to go to live under good laws.

    Notice that some groups are trying to get the WTO to create laws to force everyone to adopt that group's favorite solution (save/eat the whales,stop/encourage solar/coal/wind/nuclear power, stop/require slave/free labor...). The WTO is supposed to be about Trade not social programs.

    1. Re:Stopping power flow is the way to go by Epeeist · · Score: 1

      But trade doesn't exist in isolation, it exists in a social, moral, and environmental milieu.

      The large corporations, who exert most influence at the WTO, don't care about these things. After all they don't contribute to profits and may in fact reduce them.

    2. Re:Stopping power flow is the way to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Controlling what corporations may or may not do is not the WTO's job. Such pressures should be aimed at the corporations, their stockholders, and the appropriate governments. Those who try to make the WTO affect non-trade laws are just lazy, in trying to get their changes forced upon everyone with a single change. If they have a good cause and a good case then they should just explain it at the local level.

    3. Re:Stopping power flow is the way to go by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 2
      Such pressures should be aimed at the corporations, their stockholders, and the appropriate governments.
      But governments have ceded, by treaty, a large part of their power in these areas to the WTO! And in this speculative market, stockholders are largely apathetic so long as the stock price goes up - what does a day trader care about long term results?
      Those who try to make the WTO affect non-trade laws are just lazy,
      The WTO already affects non-trade laws, by making it illegal for member nations to impose reasonably strict environmental and labor conditions on the good that they import.
      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
  10. Yngwie Malmsteen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yngwie Malmsteen has already replaced Jimi...

    1. Re:Yngwie Malmsteen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ohhh please....... yngwie defines "electric guitar masturbation"

    2. Re:Yngwie Malmsteen by Captain+Teflon · · Score: 1

      No one replaced Hendrix, but Stevie Ray Vaughan did best at picking up where he left off. Malmsteen is a different genre entirely IMHO.

      --
      Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.
    3. Re:Yngwie Malmsteen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was only one Jimi, a brief flaming comet in a sea of mediocrity. Others have followed but all have lacked J's incredible *funkiness*. Could you imagine Malmsteen attempting "Let me Stand.." Blech!

  11. That address for the cut'n'paste impaired by sparks · · Score: 1
    1. Re:That address for the cut'n'paste impaired by daviddennis · · Score: 2

      Strange, "The system cannot find the file specified", but it's not formatted like any web error message I've ever seen.

      D

      ----

  12. Why "hippies"? by Tim+Behrendsen · · Score: 1

    Maybe I'm "too young to understand" (I'm right on the cusp, being 35), but why would anyone want to identify themselves as a hippie? To me, a hippie represents self-indulgent destructiveness. We're still suffering the damage that was caused by these self-titled "free thinkers". Not to say that everything that came out of the 60-70s was bad, but the "hippies" had very little to do with the good parts (OK, perhaps much of the music can be credited to hippies).

    By calling themselves hippies, is this supposed to create some sort of trust in me? If so, it has utterly failed in my case.

    1. Re:Why "hippies"? by RayChuang · · Score: 1

      Fortunately, SOME "hippies" have managed to channel their ideals into something REAL, like the modern desktop computer.

      Ever heard of the Homebrew Computer Club? They were a bunch of 60's hippies that discovered that technology CAN change the world. Think of the two founders of Apple Computer--both hung around the hippie movement in the 1960's, were very active in the Homebrew Computer Club, and Jobs and Wozniak created Apple in 1976 to build computers. And they're still around today.

      Or how about other 60's hippies like Stewart Brand, Jim Warren and Alan Kay? All three of them either encouraged the development of computer technology or are heavily involved in its development. They also had close ties to the Homebrew Computer Club, too.

      --
      Raymond in Mountain View, CA
  13. WTO: Tyranny of a thousand cuts by Demona · · Score: 2
    More lawyer crap. Big organizations that yammer about freedom of trade are usually not thinking the freedom of individuals to buy and sell to whomever they wish, and whatever they wish, but the freedom of corporations to have special privileges and to take away the normal freedom of individuals. They remind me of the British sugar merchants during the American Revolution who bitched when people smuggled in French molasses to avoid taxes:

    "The American derived his right of cheating the Revenue, and of perjuring himself, from the example of his fathers and the rights of nature...[and would continue to] complain and smuggle, and smuggle and complain, till all Restraints are removed, and till he can both buy and sell, whenever, and wheresoever, he pleases. Anything short of this, is still a Greivance, a Badge of Slavery." Charles Adams, For Good and Evil: The Impact of Taxes on the Course of Civilization

    Damn straight.

    Hippies can rail all they want about how evil money is, and how evil the freedom of individuals to trade amongst themselves is. Meanwhile, these frigging control freaks speak forked tongue lawyerese instead of plain, simple language...understandable, if your goals are FUD and power over others' lives.

    --
    Fuck Slashdot
  14. Happiness is... by Nipok+Nek · · Score: 1

    ... the fact that no one has refered to what they are doing (the Virtual Sit-in) as "Slashdot"ing the servers. That would lead to some embarasing explainations.

    --
    Why choose white shoes?
    1. Re:Happiness is... by Your_Mom · · Score: 1
      I knew we should of patented the Slashdot Effect!

      Rob, Jeff, You gotta think ahead! *GRIN*

      --
      Objects in the blog are closer then they ap
  15. Clickable address by zipwow · · Score: 1
    here's the address from a previous post, with html tags so's you don't have to do all that 'work' cutting and pasting. Don't eat the paste.

    http://www.gn.apc.org/pmhp/ehippies/

    --
    I don't know which is more depressing, that 2/3 didn't care enough to vote, or that 1/2 of those that did are crazy.
    1. Re:Clickable address by NightHwk · · Score: 1

      That page seems to have been taken down, any mirrors available?

      --

  16. WTO only as much government as it's allowed to be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    The WTO uses the promise of more trade and the threat of trade sanctions to entice supposedly democratic governments (including ours, here in the USA) to change their laws in ways contrary to the wishes of their citizens. While this is somewhat slimy behaviour, the protesters here at Seattle are in the wrong place to do anything about it. It is the responsibility of the legislature to resist these kinds of enticements, and Washington DC is on the other coast. They should be protesting there, not here. All the WTO's doing here is hammering out a list of guidelines which their member corporations will use to draw up contracts among themselves. I would not like to see the right to peaceably assemble, or the right to draw legally binding contracts, to come under attack, so I have little sympathy for the protesters.

    -- Guges --

  17. Re:The 60s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    blah blah blah blah blah

  18. So who owns the rights to folk medicines by Epeeist · · Score: 1

    I saw an interesting article recently about a plant used for generations in India as an analgesic. There was some trade in the plant, enough to employ a significant number of people.

    An American company (I am not being anti-American here, insert the name of any developed country) had taken the plant, extracted the active ingredient and patented it.

    The company had no intention of paying the native Indians, who presumably had prior art and would be made unemployed by the action of the company.

    1. Re:So who owns the rights to folk medicines by Paul+Johnson · · Score: 2
      The company had no intention of paying the native Indians, who presumably had prior art and would be made unemployed by the action of the company.

      Thats a pretty big presumption.

      First of all, the company in question has added value by identifying the active ingredient. This took research. Getting it approved as a medicine will have taken lots of money on top of that. The active ingredient, is more valuable when purified than when in the plant. Even more valuable is the knowledge of its side effects and contra-indications. I, at least, am unwilling to trust my health to approximate doses of a drug with unknown side effects brewed up in an ad-hoc manner from stored herbs when instead I can take a tablet with exactly 100mg in it and read a leaflet warning me that long term use has been linked to liver failure.

      This may result in loss to the native Indians who previously traded in the plant. But set against that must be the benefits to many other people (not all of them rich) who can now get the pure form, plus associated knowledge, where before was only folklore.

      And anyway, just where do you think the nasty western drug company gets its raw materials? Yes, right where they always did: the native Indians.

      A key issue here is that trade increases the wealth of both parties. If it didn't then one of them would refuse to trade. Therefore anything which increases the freedom to trade is a Good Thing. Those who would deny poor peasants the right to trade what they have in return for what they want or need should consider this before issuing blanket condemnations of the WTO.

      Also, take another look at India. At the end of WW2 it was comparitively wealthy, especially compared to China, Hong Kong, and even Japan (which had, after all, just lost the war). The reason it did not become more wealthy was the belief of its leaders, especially Ghandi and Nheru, that competition was a bad thing, especially when it caused a company to lose market share and hence lay off employees. The result was a long period when a factory owner wishing to increase production had to apply for government permission, which was likely to be refused if the government thought that the increased sales would be at the cost of one of his competitors. This in turn led to the "Hindu rate of growth", which was as close to zero after allowing for population growth as made no effective difference. That, and not the WTO, is the reason you see children employed in building sites in India.

      Paul.

      --
      You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
  19. Protesting Globalization by rasmichael · · Score: 1


    Sure it has a lot to do with intellectual property, but the WTO protests are more about keeping the environmental and labor legislative power out of the hands of the 500 or so global corporations that dominate the international trade scene. Insurrection is the only way to go.

    --
    \\ Where's my giant foam cowboy hat and airhorn?
    1. Re:Protesting Globalization by Saige · · Score: 3

      Sure it has a lot to do with intellectual property, but the WTO protests are more about keeping the environmental and labor legislative power out of the hands of the 500 or so global corporations that dominate the international trade scene. Insurrection is the only way to go.

      The WTO has been making some amazing claims as to what constitutes a "trade barrier". Often environmental and health laws fit into this territory - did you know that the WTO considered the whole "doplhin-safe tuna" thing in the US to be a trade barrier? Last I knew, companies weren't even allowed to advertise their tuna as dolphin-safe (though I haven't looked at a can of tuna to double check).

      There's nothing wrong with globalization. There are, however, numerous things wrong with the "backroom deal" method that the WTO is using.
      ---

      --
      "You know your god is man-made when he hates all the same people you do."
    2. Re:Protesting Globalization by mong · · Score: 1

      Agreed. WTO are a Good Thing(tm).

      Just because they're big, it doens't mean they're bad :)

      Mong.

      * Paul Madley ...Student, Artist, Techie - Geek *

      --

      *...Slacker, Artist, Techie - Geek *
      Remember: Nothing is Cool.
  20. Denial of Service Attack by InitZero · · Score: 2


    This is a denial of service attack. Plain and simple.
    'Duh!', you say, 'and for a good cause.'
    I won't debate the merits of the World Trade Organization. That's for you to decide.
    I will, however, point out that this is a Really Bad Thing to do. In the good old days, a sit-in only affected the business you were targetting. This affects all of us who use the net.
    When colored folks sat down in a diner and refused the leave, the diner was the only business that was affected.
    When nutballs (er, concerned citizens) start a denial of service attack against the WTO's web page, that not only affects the WTO but also the usefulness of the entire net.
    That is wrong and short sighted. It will also have a meaningless effect on the conference.
    The news media love to shoot video of folks standing outside a building with signs. Can you see the nightly news doing a bar graph showing ping times to the WTO web site before, during and after the protest?
    I can't.

    In the meantime, don't slow down my net connection.

    InitZero

    1. Re:Denial of Service Attack by Xkill_ · · Score: 0

      your argument is like saying that the civil rights protesters of the 60's should not have went to the segregated businesses to protest because they were congesting traffic on their way to the protest.

      i think we should outlaw web browsers because people are using them to slow down my quake bandwidth...

      "The importance of using technology in the right way has never been more clear."

      --

    2. Re:Denial of Service Attack by Dagmar+d'Surreal · · Score: 1

      Possibly you should take a break from sniffing glue and reconsider whether or not this type of Denial of Service attack affects more than just the site it's aimed at.

      What the Ehippies (okay, so the name is weak) are advocating is basically a concious "slashdotting" of a particular server. It is not some heavily overdone SYNflood or UDPstorm and as such isn't going to have much of an impact on anything but the WTO's servers and the segments very near to it, of which I am *certain* you are not on.

      ...and if you want your porn faster, get a cablemodem and quit wasting time complaining about what other people do with the internet, cluebie.

    3. Re:Denial of Service Attack by AllynKC · · Score: 1

      I can't seem to reach http://www.gn.apc.org/pmhp/ehippies/ - it seems they've been slashdotted.

      From what I've read from other posts of what was on that site, it seems a fair turn on them. It's the Karma - don't threaten DOS if your server isn't any better ...

    4. Re:Denial of Service Attack by Tackhead · · Score: 4
      >...is wrong and short sighted. It will also have a meaningless effect on the conference.

      Amen.

      Civil disobedience does not give you the right to break laws in the advocacy of your cause and not expect repercussions. The point of civil disobedience is that while you're breaking the law, you're also willing to face up to your responsibilities as a citizen -- and you're therefore willing to suffer the consequences.

      If you're DOSsing WTO servers in the name of some hippie cause, you should be prepared to lose your internet connectivity at a minimum, and face criminal charges (with associated seizure of your computer equipment) at a maximum. When the dust settles, I'll still disagree with what you're doing, I'll still disagree with your politics, but at least I'll respect that you're willing to take the heat for your views. You're a whackjob, but you've got integrity.

      If, however, you're DOSsing WTO servers but not prepared to suffer these consequences, you're lame, just like a relay-raping spammer or a random script kiddie, and I look forward to laughing at your whining when your ISP cuts you off and (if you're in the US) the Feds show up at your door to haul your ass to jail.

      Sadly, I suspect that most of these "e-hippies" couldn't define civil disobedience with both hands and a flashlight, and fall in the latter category rather than the former. They choose to DOS attack WTO servers rather than express their views effectively because anything more complicated than spending 2 minutes setting up an infinite-reload script might actually require work on their part. Feh.

  21. Untold Damage, my god! by FreeUser · · Score: 1

    To me, a hippie represents self-indulgent destructiveness. We're still suffering the damage that was caused by these self-titled "free thinkers".

    Are you referring to the terrible damage the hippies caused in protesting the Vietnam war, applying sufficient political pressur to eventually force the US Government to cut its losses and pull out, thereby ending decades of sensless bloodshed?

    Or perhaps you refer to the untold damage the civil rights movement (supported in no small part by these "self indulgent hippies" of yore) has caused this country? Absolutely shameless, to demand that we adhere to the notion that "all men are created equal."

    Or is it the ACLU which is the subject of your ire, which owes no small part of its existence and continued support to hippies and aging ex-hippies, among others? Damn liberals, always insisting people have inalienable rights!

    Or is it the flooding of the workplace by those uppity women, who have since the sixties been insisting on equal employment opportunities and equivelent pay (which BTW they've yet to recieve)? Damn bitches, taking all those good jobs away from hard working, testosterone driven men!

    Perhaps it is free thought itself which offends you most. Goddamn non-conformist long hairs, saying things that contradict my world view and make me feel uncomfortable.

    Then of course, there are all those Marijuana Addicts, killing their families with axes! The Menance surrounds us, you might have read about it in the papers.[1]

    While it is your constitutional right to adhere to and promote political philosophies that are to the right of Gengis Khan, it is thankfully the constitutional right of the rest of us to openly laugh at and mock you for espousing such extreme views.

    [1]Paraphrased from the 1930's propoganda film "Reefer Madness."

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
    1. Re:Untold Damage, my god! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh. It appears that anyone with the temerity to criticise liberalism is an extremist. As the old joke goes: A bigot is anyone who wins an argument with a liberal.

    2. Re:Untold Damage, my god! by zantispam · · Score: 2

      "it is thankfully the constitutional right of the rest of us to openly laugh at and mock you for espousing such extreme views."

      It is also our right to educate and to forgive. It is also our right to illustrate ignorance, so that others may not be so blind.
      It is also our right to remember that we are all human beings, and that we all fall short at some point.

      None (save the Buddah) are enlightened.

      Put down the flamethrower, brother.


      Jedi Hacker (Apprentice) and Code Poet

      --

      censorship is a form of noise, which actively seeks to drown out content with silence - Crash Culligan
    3. Re:Untold Damage, my god! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is all a bunch of tree huggin hippie crap! Peace wigga Jedi Monkey and Code Ignorant

    4. Re:Untold Damage, my god! by Tim+Behrendsen · · Score: 0

      LOL! I can't believe how much credit you give to the whining middle class white children of the 60s.

      Vietnam war... there is no doubt that the hippies were part of it, but it was primarily the huge losses that changed public opinion. Public opinion, not "hippie opinion". Of course, we could bring up Jane Fonda, who called a bunch of prisoners "liars" for claiming they were tortured. I guess you think JF was a national hero?

      Civil rights... typical liberal. Take credit for someone else's work. I think Martin Luther King and other black leaders had a lot more to do with it.

      ACLU... Some good (privacy), some bad, but mostly bad. They are one of the most responsible for the death of common sense in the law. Of course children have the right to disrupt their schools! It's free speech, dontcha know? (never mind that the other students are thus denied the right to an education in a reasonable environment)

      Women... again, you give credit where none is due, unless you count silly gestures like "burning bras" somehow got woman into boardrooms. And by the way, those "equal pay" figures are usually completely false. It's not equal, but it's far closer than the "urban legend" figures that everyone quotes. Read actual studies.

      Free thought... free thought is fine. It's when society becomes slaves to a tyranny of the minority that things become a problem. Schools are a disaster because the 5% wackos make such a problem that they sound like 51%.

      Drugs... Ah, finally. I notice that you conveniently leave out LSD, Heroin, etc. The hippie's greatest legacy is the drug culture. Aren't you proud?

      Extreme views... Again, LOL. You only have to look at the trail of damage that came out of the 60s to see the truth. I'm sure you were also a fan of the Great Society.

      I'm sure it makes you feel good to brag to your friends about how much you "care". What's amusing is that you make so many assumptions about what I believe based on my post. You are so hate-filled about what you think of as the "political right" that you can't even think logically. I'm thinking the anger is caused by the fact that you know the truth, but you can't admit your liberal/socialist philosophies have caused "Untold Damage" to the country. I hope someday you will see the truth.

    5. Re:Untold Damage, my god! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Drugs... Ah, finally. I notice that you conveniently leave out LSD, Heroin, etc.
      Since when has Heroin been a "hippy" drug? Hippies arn't the only once that abuse illicit substances. And as for the implied association between smack and acid. Two things came out of Harvard in the 60's ...
    6. Re:Untold Damage, my god! by Industrial+Disease · · Score: 2

      Most of the people I've met that call themselves "hippies" have been nothing more than kids who buy tie-dye shirts and Grateful Dead CD's at the mall with Daddy's gold card, sit around, watch TV, and tell each other how cool they are. Real activists I have some respect for (even if I don't agree with all their views), but if they were ever more than a tiny subset of the "hippie" movement, that time is long past. Why a modern protest movement would want to saddle itself with that kind of lame nostalgia is beyond me.

      --
      Weblogging Considered Harmful:
    7. Re:Untold Damage, my god! by FreeUser · · Score: 2

      I have no argument with what you have said. However, what remains unsaid is I think important.

      Extreme views have a way of becoming legitimized through simple repetition if they are not countered and countered forcefully. Laughter, mockery, and the pointing out of their absurdity is an important tool in countering such viewpoints, and do serve to illustrate ignorance quite well. Education and forgiveness are also legitimate tools, but not exclusively so.

      I make no claims of enlightenment, beyond some level of common sense which appears to exceed that of the post to which I replied. My "flame" was quite mild, given the venom with which the original poster chose to demonize an entire demographic group and, in his response to my comments, an entire generation during which, ironically, some of the most important social changes and progress took place.

      If you have any doubts as to the original poster's extremety, may I refer you to his response to my comments? I leave it to any rational, dispassionate observer to draw their own conclusions at this point.

      --
      The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
    8. Re:Untold Damage, my god! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a typical response to anyone with the temerity to criticise someone for dissing all peoples with political leanings left of center. In this case, anyone with political leanings left of the moderate right.

      AFAICT the poster's reply does make him out to be a wee bit extreme in his political leanings (the notion that anyone who opposed the war in Vietnam approved of Jane Fonda's reprehensible behavior and the assertion that the ACLU is responsible for all of our educational problems, for crying out loud! I suppose the latter has nothing to do with local boards of education like the one in Kansas ...)

    9. Re:Untold Damage, my god! by Tim+Behrendsen · · Score: 1

      What's typical is that liberals read what they want to read, not what's actually there.

      In my original post, I didn't "diss" everyone left of center, I dissed "hippies". In my follow up post, I dissed many philosophies left of center, not "all peoples".

      Exactly where did I say that everyone opposed to Vietnam approved of Jane Fonda? Please supply a quote. Jane Fonda was a well-known hippie, however. My point is that public opinion ended vietnam, whereas hippies often did more harm than good.

      And, of course, I never said that the ACLU is responsible for "all" of our educational problems. They are, however, responsible for many of them. (A much bigger target is the national teacher union, but that is off the subject).

    10. Re:Untold Damage, my god! by FreeUser · · Score: 2

      I'll answere this one for anoymous.

      What's typical is that liberals read what they want to read, not what's actually there.

      What is typical of the written word is for the reader to not only read the literal words, but to interpret their underlying meaning based on context and verbiage. When one is caught out making assertions or implications which are out of line, the typical defense is to deny any underlying meaning and insist on second-grade, literal interpretation of the words written, ignoring or playing down any context or common meaning of the verbiage employed.

      It is also very common for extremests to lump large, disparate groups of people together and assign to them attributes which they either do not possess at all, those only a small mintority of them possess, or those which all people possess with the implication that it is an attribute primarilly of that particular group (in this case "liberals"). This is generally coupled with denying any positive attributes said group may have, even those so obvious as to be common knowledge. Examples of this behavior include:

      "LOL! I can't believe how much credit you give to the whining middle class white children of the 60s."

      ("whining" is a negative attribute which is by no means unique to middle class white children of the hippies. Witness your own off-topic whining about the alleged impact of "hippies" on our current affairs.)

      "Women... again, you give credit where none is due, unless you count silly gestures like "burning bras" somehow got woman into boardrooms."

      (Here you state emphatically that the women's movement had little or no effect on the treatment of women and the opening of career opportunities previously denied them. To underscore this, you use a popularized image taken from a protest in an effort to imply the women were foolish, ineffectual, crazy, or all of the above, while ignoring both the importance of protest as a method for catalyzing social change and the fact that symbolic acts such as bra-burning were just that, symbolic.)

      I think it should be becoming clear to you why I and others do get the impression that you are espousing extreme views, based on your rhetoric. I could go on with further examples, but I think the rest of your comments more or less speaks for themselves, and I do not take much joy in tearing your words apart in such a public manner.

      Exactly where did I say that everyone opposed to Vietnam approved of Jane Fonda?

      "Vietnam war... there is no doubt that the hippies were part of it, but it was primarily the huge losses that changed public opinion. Public opinion, not "hippie opinion". Of course, we could bring up Jane Fonda, who called a bunch of prisoners "liars" for claiming they were tortured. I guess you think JF was a national hero?"

      While you did not state word for word that those "opposed to Vietname approved of Jane Fonda", you clearly make this implication in both the context with which you raise Jane Fonda and the assertion you then make regarding my beliefs in that context. (Not that it matters, but for the record I vehemently disagree with what she did. Being on the right side of an issue does not magically transform an ass into a saint, as she so very clearly demonstrated.)

      Your response will no doubt now be to use semantics to reduce the limit and scope of your assertions and their implications, now that I and others have spoken out against them, or to resort to additional ad hominim attacks against myself or others. Be my guest -- I think even those sympathetic to your political stance will see that for what it is. In the meantime, I have work to do.

      --
      The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
    11. Re:Untold Damage, my god! by Tim+Behrendsen · · Score: 1

      You are absolutely amazing.

      ...the reader to not only read the literal words, but to interpret their underlying meaning based on context and verbiage. ...the typical defense is to deny any underlying meaning and insist on second-grade, literal interpretation of the words written, ignoring or playing down any context or common meaning of the verbiage employed.

      Are you seriously arguing that the meaning of the words should not have as much weight as your interpretation of the words???

      That's right, you've got me, everything I say is couched in code words. I don't really mean what I actually say.

      Let's take this laughable example (there I go with the rhetoric again)...

      My comment: "Women... again, you give credit where none is due, unless you count silly gestures like "burning bras" somehow got woman into boardrooms."

      (Here you state emphatically that the women's movement had little or no effect on the treatment of women and the opening of career opportunities previously denied them...

      Do you actually read what you write? Hint: The context (as you so like to point out) is "hippies" and their impact on society. I mocked the hippie's influence on the women's movement, and you change that into mocking the women's movement. Of course, my objecting to your twisting my words is merely "denying any underlying meaning" (how can I be so blind to the truth of my inner feelings?).

      The women's movement clearly had a positive impact on society, but that has nothing to do with hippies. Burning bras was meaningless symbolism. The real work was done by the rank and file who became educated, worked hard, and progressed up through the ranks, taking the hits along the way.

      That's called substance, not symbolism. People like you worship the symbols of the culture, rather than real progress, because they make you feel good. That's why you're so outlandishly defensive about "hippies" because they represent a symbol to you. Never mind looking at history and what the real effect of that was.

      Face it: Your radical, extreme views don't need to be discredited by me; history has done a fine job. I know it's difficult to face the truth. Questioning your inner beliefs is one of the most difficult things in the world, which explains your unreasonable hatred and anger of opposing beliefs.

      And as for Jane Fonda, congratulation on having the guts to say she was wrong. Too bad so many hippies embraced her as a hero back then -- and many still do today.

    12. Re:Untold Damage, my god! by Dankweed · · Score: 1

      I will generally give you a "write on, brother" but dude, don't ever lump LSD together with heroin. LSD (the drug) has never directly killed anyone, and if taken in the right fram of mind can be very enlightening and if you are at all hedonistic it can be extremley fun. I'm so tired of all the lies surrounding LSD. It is a perfectly safe drug that needs more psycological research to see how it can benefit man kind. Heroin is a very addictive and deadly drug that should never be touched by ANYONE.

      And before anyone poopoo's my opinion of LSD please check the facts about that one guy in college who took it and jumped in front of a car or jumped out of a window. This kind of thing generally does not happen to normal people who take it. Crazy people who take it just get crazier.. that is not good.

      --
      -- Object known as a camera. Vintage uncertain, origin unknown. - Twilight Zone
  22. The WTO or the Cold war, which do you prefer? by Simon+Hibbs · · Score: 2

    The World Trade Organisation is getting in the neck simply
    because the issue of trade is linked in to so many other
    issues. Environmental damage, employee rights, GM food,
    food hygiene, all these headline issues are related to
    international trade.

    People like the electorhippies exist to protest on these
    and other similar issues - that's what they're for.
    Therefore they will protest whenever and wherever these
    issues are relevent _regardless_ of whether their protest
    is helping or hindering the resolution of these problems.
    They can always claim a moral high groudn for haveing
    'done something', however banal that something may have
    been.

    Surely if the global environment is going to be protected,
    the human rights of child labourers in third world countries
    are going to be protected, and fair trade and prosperity
    encouraged agreements made between the nations involved.
    Simply attacking this process is irresponsible and damaging,
    to jobs, economies, health, the environment and the
    aspirations of the weakest countries in the world. The
    alternative is to leave the most powerfull nations, such
    as the US and power blocks such as the EU, to carve up
    the global economy behind closed doors. Is that realy
    prefferable?

    This kind of protest is akin to terrorism, it doen't
    progress the goals of the perpetrators and in fact galvanises
    their opponents to resist legitimate lobbying.

    The orriginal post taked about using the net to advance freedom.
    What freedom? The freedom to attack our economies, wreck
    environmental reform and damage the wider acceptance of human
    rights? What about the freedom to trade, to work whenre and for
    whom you want to? The freedom to invest in emerging third world
    economies and strengthen trade ties between former foes?

    Surely communication between the world powers on trade and all
    it's related issues shoudl be encouraged and supported. Which
    do you prefer, the WTO or the Cold War?


    Simon Hibbs

    1. Re:The WTO or the Cold war, which do you prefer? by totoro · · Score: 1

      I sincerely suggest that you research what the WTO has stood for in its past actions.It serves the interests of huge multinational corporations above and beyond anything else.There are many examples of how the WTO is the weapon utilized to force unsustainable and detrimental policies upon sovereign nations in the name of "free trade"From 1988 until August of this year, Europe banned the import US beef because it contains growth-enhancing hormones.The WTO declared the ban illegal since it was detrimental to free trade.Regardless of whether or not you feel that injesting animal hormones is safe can you honestly say that it this is fair?Is it really the responsibility of the WTO to decide that it knows what is best for the health of the European people?I definitely do not think so. It is because of decisions like this that the WTO is "getting in the neck" and rightfully so.

      I agree that a denial of service attack against the WTO may not be the most productive form of protest possible, but I am confused by your statements in the third paragraph.It seems to me that you are stating that the WTO is somehow unlike allowing "the most powerful nations, such as the US and power blocks such as the EU, to carve up the global economy behind closed doors."In truth, the WTO is much worse.Since the WTO is the puppet of short sighted and self minded multinational corporations that are generally aloof from the citizens of the world, the only say that we have is through protest. What kind of freedom is that?To suggest that the only alternative to the WTO is a Cold War is misinformed.The WTO is operating behind closed doors, and it is the goal of the protesters to try and inform everyone of this and to ensure that the WTO does not increase its already disturbing amount of influence over our lives.

      Here are some links that should help arm and inform:

      -Larry
    2. Re:The WTO or the Cold war, which do you prefer? by GooseKirk · · Score: 1

      There a few good points here... it is true that strong trade ties between nations helps maintain the peace. I'm all in favor of that. But...

      "The alternative is to leave the most powerfull nations, such as the US and power blocks such as the EU, to carve up the global economy behind closed doors."

      The alternative?? Come again? I'm sorry, I thought that was pretty much exactly what's going on.

      And this:

      "Which do you prefer, the WTO or the Cold War?"

      is just a non-sequiter.

      I don't have any trouble with globalization per se. It's globalization at the expense of the environment, human rights, small businessmen, the working class, and the rights of people to govern themselves (instead of being dictated to from multinational corporate boardrooms). The WTO has so far been mostly working to allow the rich and powerful to become moreso while blatantly disregarding some very critical issues. The goal of the protests is to force these issues to the table... which, it should be noted, is not quite the same thing as starting up the Cold War again.

    3. Re:The WTO or the Cold war, which do you prefer? by itachi · · Score: 2

      Regardless of whether or not you feel that injesting animal hormones is safe can you honestly say that it this is fair? Is it really the responsibility of the WTO to decide that it knows what is best for the health of the European people?

      Well, yes, the WTO should be allowed to tell the EU to halt the import ban. If the EU wants to require that all imported US beef is labelled as such and include a warning about the possible health risks, thats a whole seperate issue. But the point of the WTO is free trade, which is beneficial to everyone involved. The WTO helps consumers in any member nation by driving prices lower for any traded goods. An import ban causes prices to rise, since there is a lower quantity of the good available for trade. With greater quantity available, prices fall, and consumers win. If hormone-treated beef is labelled as such, you will find a segment of consumers who are willing to pay a premium for the non-treated beef. So the cattle ranchers in the EU and the US win also - they all get to sell their beef. The WTO has done nothing to the detriment of citizens of the EU with that decision. In fact, everyone involved in the trade of beef between the EU and the US, plus consumers in the EU, is better off directly because of the WTO decision.


      While you're mentioning greenpeace, etc., let me suggest a few places to go for a more economically aware perspective of the situation.

      The Cato Institute
      The Economist
      and
      The Adam Smith Institue


      itachi

    4. Re:The WTO or the Cold war, which do you prefer? by totoro · · Score: 1

      Your point seems valid, in theory, but in reality, it is not the case.The European ban was originally put into place partly due to the fact that supposedly untreated beef from the US in reality contained hormones.So much for labelling!Besides, I do not think that the US wants to label its beef and would probably use the WTO to fight for this.So that would eliminate any choice that the consumer would have regarding hormone treated beef.Additionally, many people feel a moral objection to treating cows with such hormones since it is cruel to the animal.This is the general consensus among the people of Europe.I am of the opinion that to introduce hormone treated beef into the European market would cause beef sales to decline, so everyone loses.The consumers are stuck with a product that they do not want, European farmers lose money, and the health and ideals of the people are compromised.


      Thank you for the links you have provided, I will have to check them out when I get a chance.I might also add that the ZNet link I provided contains many economic issues and links to many more.The differences between your opinion and mine illustrate exactly why there is so much controversy surrounding the WTO.Most people (myself included) agree that the global market is important and needs to experience growth and evolution for humankind to prosper and close in on world wide equality for all.Some people will say that the WTO is the way to go, but many argue that a different approach is required altogether.


      -Larry
  23. comments by Xkill_ · · Score: 1

    i agree that this probabally wont solve anything because they are protesting to the wrong people. they should maybe protest US government sites instead, after all it is the US government that is abiding by the WTO's guidelines.

    however i think this type of protest is a good thing. granted it sucks if you are on the wrong side of the stick, but it does intice companies/organizations to act ethically otherwise the majority of people out there will slashdot your web page. :)

    "The importance of using technology in the right way has never been more clear."

    --

  24. Hippies?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Send in the Hells Angels for security. Hippies are associated in popular culture with violence, drugs and criminal activities. They died a horrible death by 1970. Looking at the protestors on TV they look like radical left-wingers -- strung out on too many drugs and with little concept of what they are fighting for. Children of hippies: Yes. Hippies? No way.

    1. Re:Hippies?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hippies were disgusting, unwashed people with too much time on their hands. There isn't much difference between them and the crusty punks you see today except maybe crusty punks turn tricks for heroin. Hippies did it for free.

    2. Re:Hippies?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well said.

    3. Re:Hippies?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bravo!

  25. Because (OT) by zantispam · · Score: 2

    I'm terribly sorry that this is your definition of `hippie'. I call myself one with pride.

    To me, a hippie is someone who places trust in friends, knows right and wrong, knows how to fight for the former and avoid the latter, and will (generally) do The Right Thing(TM).

    I guess hippies grew up a bit after the Seventies (disco; what were we thinking?!?!?) and Eighties (Greed is Good).

    Anyhoo, my parents were hippies back in the day, as it were, and I guess I'm loosely following in their footsteps (I'm 22).

    How does that adage go? Something about judging a book or something (y'know, I'm too high on pot and flower power to remember (for the humor-impared, that was sarcasm, and it was intended to be nice sarcasm)).

    Jedi Hacker (Apprentice) and Code Poet

    --

    censorship is a form of noise, which actively seeks to drown out content with silence - Crash Culligan
  26. Simple 404 error with weird formatting by MAXOMENOS · · Score: 2

    I tried both Netscape (which gave me same the error message you got) and IE5.0; IE gave me a simple 404 error.

    Hopefully the web page went down with Slashdot effect, and not because of police intervention. Then again, with the world becoming the place it is, who knows.........

    The Kulturwehrmacht

    1. Re:Simple 404 error with weird formatting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I loaded the page, whent to the sit-in page, and then all the links stopped working. A re-load yielded me the same "The system cannot find the file specified." as did a visit to the root URL of the server it was on.

      Looks like someone got to 'em....

      = Ruby

  27. Where was the 60's [Re:To quote] by quasimoto · · Score: 1
    I had a flashback of a time in 1969. I was OD green and I think I recall that I asked, "Oh, Man. How did I get here and who are these guys?'.

    1999 - live, CNBC (tv) is running stories about how secure the WTO meetings are. The cool people are dancing for the media and it looks so staged. The reporter spits out bytes on how the entire place is under control of the anti-terrorist cops and that trouble makers are being rounded up before they get too close. Sorry folks, the cops/fbi/other countries cops, are not going to put up with much trouble. Any protest marchers on TV will be staged for the media.

    A cyber battle with the WTO is inconsequential (and unhealthy), the cyber cops are there too. -d

  28. Re:Thank God the 60's are gone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a bunch of morons hippies were. Peace man, like far out dude, we can do with out that bunch of crap. Buncha tree huggin saps.

  29. The WTO is not your friend by MillMan · · Score: 4

    Unless you're really really rich, and want to get richer. They scare me more than the US government, be cause they have the power to overrule laws of any member country that get in the way of "competition". This includes labar and environmental laws. The web page below has a number of articles on the WTO as well as photos of some of the demonstrations going on. Seattle doesn't look like a happy place at the moment.

    http://www.zmag.org/CrisesCurEvts/Globalism/Glob alEcon.htm

  30. Milan Kundera on Protest by megalobrainiac · · Score: 2
    I find this passage useful for thinking about protest marches.

    From The Unbearable Lightness of Being:

    A year or two after emigrating, she happened to be in Paris on the anniversary of the Russian invasion of her country. A protest march had been scheduled, and she felt driven to take part. Fists raised high, the young Frenchmen shouted out slogans condemning Soviet imperialism. She liked the slogans, but to her surprise she found herself unable to shout along with them. She lasted no more than a few minutes in the parade.

    When she told her French friends about it, they were amazed. 'You mean you don't want to fight the occupation of your country?' She would have liked to tell them that behind Communism, Fascism, behind all occupations and invasions lurks a more basic, pervasive evil and that the image of that evil was a parade of people marching by with raised fists and shouting identical syllables in unison. But she knew she would never be able to make them understand. Embarrassed, she changed the subject.

    1. Re:Milan Kundera on Protest by Chromalon · · Score: 2


      This is an eloquent passage. It's clear that you sympathize with the discomfort and unpleasantness this girl feels. Like Kundera, however, she is incapable of using her will to conquer this difficulty. What is the difficulty? I think for many, including myself, protest marches are difficult because you must subjugate yourself to the crowd. The words and slogans sound ridiculous coming from your own mouth.

      But why then, do hockey games and basketball games not elicit the same visceral shudder? After all, these events are basically "people marching by with raised fists and shouting identical syllables in unison." Are sports a "basic, pervasive evil"? I suppose it could be argued, but from a pretty cynically abstract point of view.

      Kundera seizes on the *form* of the protest march as oppressive, being the consummate aesthete that he is. I would suggest that protest and dissent makes you uncomfortable not because of the form per se, but because of the political necessity in these situations of subjugating your own desires (the desire to be liked, to be cool, to be 'successful', etc.) to a more anonymous and collective desire. Such a subjugation takes a great effort of will, my friend. Identifying how you can be a unique vessel for a truthful message is far more difficult than using weakly nostalgic old lech writers as the cover for your fears.

      People are mobilizing in hundreds of cities this week to protest the WTO. Granted, many of the
      demonstrations will be simplistic and over-earnest bore-fests. I agree that this is a problem. Shit should be exciting. But the political necessity is very real. The WTO can veto legislation retroactively if they find that it "hampers trade," and they can do it secretly. This is simply unprecedented, unless one thinks of the Dutch East India Company and its ability to declare war on nations. The WTO is actually far more effective I think. It is not one company, but a consortium of many companies from many nations.

      Lessee, Canada has nationalized health care? Why, that's a barrier to U.S. insurance companies who want to do business there! Hmm, France subsidizes its own filmmakers? Those protectionist jerks! Not giving Big Daddy and End of Days a fair chance in the market place, who do they think they are?

      You think these scenarios sound far-fetched? Think again. If your way of life depended on decisions made by the WTO (and it inevitably does, even if the consequences aren't clear yet), you might find it easier to develop the will necessary to get over your embarrassment at shouting as loud as you can in the streets. You think that's the road to totalitarianism? Well, you're entitled to your opinion. But I think you've got it backwards.

      --
      +++ Chromalon.
    2. Re:Milan Kundera on Protest by Chromalon · · Score: 3


      This is an eloquent passage. It's clear that you sympathize with the discomfort and unpleasantness this girl feels. Like Kundera, however, she is incapable of using her will to conquer this difficulty. What is the difficulty? I think for many, including myself, protest marches are difficult because you must subjugate yourself to the crowd. The words and slogans sound ridiculous coming from your own mouth.

      But why then, do hockey games and basketball games not elicit the same visceral shudder? After all, these events are basically "people marching by with raised fists and shouting identical syllables in unison." Are sports a "basic, pervasive evil"? I suppose it could be argued, but from a pretty cynically abstract point of view.

      Kundera seizes on the *form* of the protest march as oppressive, being the consummate aesthete that he is. I would suggest that protest and dissent makes you uncomfortable not because of the form per se, but because of the political necessity in these situations of subjugating your own desires (the desire to be liked, to be cool, to be 'successful', etc.) to a more anonymous and collective desire. Such a subjugation takes a great effort of will, my friend. Identifying how you can be a unique vessel for a truthful message is far more difficult than using weakly nostalgic old lech writers as the cover for your fears.

      People are mobilizing in hundreds of cities this week to protest the WTO. Granted, many of the demonstrations will be simplistic and over-earnest bore-fests. I agree that this is a problem. Shit should be exciting. But the political necessity is very real. The WTO can veto legislation retroactively if they find that it "hampers trade," and they can do it secretly. This is simply unprecedented, unless one thinks of the Dutch East India Company and its ability to declare war on nations. The WTO is actually far more effective I think. It is not one company, but a consortium of many companies from many nations.

      Lessee, Canada has nationalized health care? Why, that's a barrier to U.S. insurance companies who want to do business there! Hmm, France subsidizes its own filmmakers? Those protectionist jerks! Not giving Big Daddy and End of Days a fair chance in the market place, who do they think they are?

      You think these scenarios sound far-fetched? Think again. If your way of life depended on decisions made by the WTO (and it inevitably does, even if the consequences aren't clear yet), you might find it easier to develop the will necessary to get over your embarrassment at shouting as loud as you can in the streets. You think that's the road to totalitarianism? Well, you're entitled to your opinion. But I think you've got it backwards.

      --
      +++ Chromalon.
    3. Re:Milan Kundera on Protest by SuperG · · Score: 1

      I think there is a difference between the kind of mob action you describe and action such as that being taken by groups such as the Electro-Hippies. One is (as you describe) creepy and bordering on violent, while the other is thoughtful.

      This excerpt you quote actually sounds very similar to some powerful passages in George Orwell's 1984, primarily those passages describing the "2 Minutes Hate". This is where the corporate drones are brought together to participate in a group hysteria and hatred session, by displaying images of enemy soldiers and the "enemy of the people", Goldstein.

      I'll try and quote from memory, but will be way off...

      "The anger and hatred flowed like an electrical current. After 20 seconds you didn't need to pretend to be involved, it was almost impossible not to participate. Winston found himself screaming and yelling despite himself."

      Anyway, you get the gist. The angry mob is something to be feared, as it represents all instinct, and no "intelligence" if you like. This is the vital difference between such primal outbursts and measured 'sit-ins' such as the Electro-Hippies. They aren't rioting in the streets, they are taking measured, conscious action.

  31. anti-freedom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apparently, they're anti-freedom protesters, attempting to block the free flow of information and preserve preferential policies that favor a few special interests...

    1. Re:anti-freedom by MAXOMENOS · · Score: 3
      Apparently, they're anti-freedom protesters, attempting to block the free flow of information and preserve preferential policies that favor a few special interests...

      Of course. As opposed to the delegates at the WTO, who are there to meet on strengthening intellecual property rights (that is, blocking the free flow of information) and removing such barriers to free trade as environmental and labor laws, on behalf of major corporations (read as a few special interests).

      What's even better is, if you don't like what the WTO is doing, you can't even elect a different WTO. They're beholden to corporations and a few government officials, not to the people.


      The Kulturwehrmacht
    2. Re:anti-freedom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what about NGOs protesting the WTO? they are not accountable to anyone but a few special interest activists . Lefties being hypocites... what a shocker....NOT!

    3. Re:anti-freedom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When freedom means getting richer by stealing from others, than I supose we are against freedom. If freedom means equality, the same money for the same kaind of work. Then I ame for that freedom. If you go AFrica once, you will live whta kind of freedom the WTO stands for.

  32. Who? by Leareth · · Score: 1

    Not to be to off topic... but who is Jimi ?

    --
    *A)bort, R)etry, I)nfluence with large hammer.*
    1. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I honesly hope he is talking about Jim Morrison, and NOT Hendrix or Page.

    2. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Jimi" is referring to Jimi Duranti, Vaudeville star. InkaDinkaDoo-Good night Mrs. Calabash, wherever you are....

    3. Re:Who? by Greg+W. · · Score: 1

      Jimi Hendrix.

  33. Undecided about WTO by Chalst · · Score: 2
    I have to say that I find myself in two minds about the WTO. On the
    one hand I believe that, in the long run, free trade is a good thing
    for all parts of the world, rich and poor alike. An organisation like
    the WTO is needed in order to prevent national governments natural
    tendencies to succumb to special interest bargaining.

    On the other hand I have to say I don't like the WTO's conduct or
    the way these treaties are negotiated. The The EU's ban on hormone
    treated beef may have been against free trade, but it was undoubtedly
    mitivated by a genuine concern for consumers health. The WTO ruling
    took no account of this. Similarly the negotiations on the MAI
    (mulitlateral agreement on investments) are deeply unopen.

    People's fears about the effects of globalisation are real: some
    people do lose jobs as a result of cheap imports, and so the arguments
    about trade really should be made in the open. Maybe making trade
    negotioations more open will slow down the adoption of free trade
    measures. Even so, I think it is better than undermining democratic
    institutions in the way they do now.

    1. Re:Undecided about WTO by Jeffrey+Baker · · Score: 2
      You must be on crack. You say that the WTO is needed because it can prevent national governments from impeding trade. WHY oh why is this a good thing? Nations are sovereign. If they want to block trade, they can damn well block trade.

      -jwb

    2. Re:Undecided about WTO by Chalst · · Score: 1
      Because nations agree to conduct themselves in accordance with free
      trade principles and then behave in a protectionist manner. This is
      the entire point of the WTO, to adjudicate in these cases as to
      whether the individual signatory nations are violating agreements or
      not.

      Please don't resort to childish abuse in future replies.

    3. Re:Undecided about WTO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IMHO, the only purpose of the WTO is to serve the interests of some multibillion US-enterprises.

    4. Re:Undecided about WTO by Chalst · · Score: 1
      The purpose of the WTO isn't a matter of opinion, it is a matter of design. The argument for the expansion of free trade is based upon Ricardo's theory of comparative advanatge, which shows that all parties to trade benefit from it regardless of relative wealth.

      Also the WTO is a multilateral organisation, so it is not simply a vehicle for US interests. There are grounds for concern that in the Uruguay round of the GATT (which created the WTO) that third world interests were not well represented. Even so, pretty much all economists, of all schools, agree that the GATT is in the broad interests of third world countries.

      I do have concerns about the WTO (see my original post) but I think being ignorant of its point is not a good thing. Even if you are opposed to it, you should at least find out the actual arguments that support it.

  34. It's Yngwie J. Malmsteen... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... Not to confuse him with al the other "Yngwie Malmsteen"s in the music Biz...

  35. Working fine. by MAXOMENOS · · Score: 1

    It's working fine now. It was merely slashdotted.
    Go nuts.


    The Kulturwehrmacht

  36. what's in a name? by Jovian · · Score: 1

    I think we need to get over itand stop arguing about things which happened 30 years ago. This discussion is about the wto and what good, if any, it's doing to our environment and working conditions all over the world. The fact that ONE of the protest groups calls themselves (or is called by Yahoo news) electrohippies isn't really the point. There are probably hundreds of organizations down in Seattle today to protest the wto.

  37. Hey, it's that myth again.. by mpk · · Score: 1

    Ah, I see they're claiming that the Internet is a "military experiment" again. Correct me if I'm wrong, but just because the original research was funded by DARPA, this doesn't mean, and never has, that the Internet was developed as a military network. This urban myth has been floating around for decades. DARPA was a civilian agency which just happened to be paid for by the DOD and located in the Pentagon.

    This doesn't mean the Internet was, or ever has been, a military network. There have been sections connected to the Internet that were military (the MILNET springs to mind) but the original research was bluesky research of the type that DARPA existed to fund, not in any way aimed at direct military applications. The whole "being able to withstand a nuclear blast" thing is a myth.

    I find it hard to take seriously a group that protests against the spreading of disinformation while spreading disinformation itself.

    For references, see any half way decent book on the history of the 'net. I think I have my facts right above, but if not, please correct me.

  38. Re:The 60s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like you're trying to blame a bunch of screwed up 20-30 year olds on something you're not responsible for (and that, conveniently, they're not responsible for either.)

    That's a very 90's way of looking at the problem.

  39. Milan Kundera on Protest by megalobrainiac · · Score: 3
    I found a passage in a novel that explains why mass actions like the electrohippie's 'electronic sit-in' have always given me the creeps--no matter how much I agree or disagree with the goals of the protesters. (And, in this case, I just don't know. Free trade is a Good Thing, and I am no enemy of globalization, but people have painted the WTO as both the apotheosis of big government and as a convenient mechanism for corporate interests to make an end run around meaningful debates on, say, intellectual property.) But even though the electrohippies aren't actually marching anywhere--

    From The Unbearable Lightness of Being:

    A year or two after emigrating, she happened to be in Paris on the anniversary of the Russian invasion of her country. A protest march had been scheduled, and she felt driven to take part. Fists raised high, the young Frenchmen shouted out slogans condemning Soviet imperialism. She liked the slogans, but to her surprise she found herself unable to shout along with them. She lasted no more than a few minutes in the parade.

    When she told her French friends about it, they were amazed. 'You mean you don't want to fight the occupation of your country?' She would have liked to tell them that behind Communism, Fascism, behind all occupations and invasions lurks a more basic, pervasive evil and that the image of that evil was a parade of people marching by with raised fists and shouting identical syllables in unison. But she knew she would never be able to make them understand. Embarrassed, she changed the subject.

    (I posted this as a reply above but, oops, I think it should be a toplevel comment.)
  40. Not anymore by chuckw · · Score: 1

    It isn't working now...
    --

    --
    *Condense fact from the vapor of nuance*
  41. Bringing back the 60's? by DrCode · · Score: 1

    Maybe the protestors are similar to those of the 60's. But if they have their way, we're more likely to see conditions like those in the 30's. It's quite likely that the major cause of the Great Depression was the trade/tariff conflict that preceded it.

  42. What OS is the WTO site running? by MAXOMENOS · · Score: 2

    If this cyberprotest doesn't manage to shut the website down cold, then whatever OS the site is running on has one hell of an anecdote.....

    Maybe if we can get the electrohippies to code a Linux test site for us, we can use this same approach to simulate heavy Web traffic on, say, a Red Hat box with the new 2.4 kernel....


    The Kulturwehrmacht
    1. Re:What OS is the WTO site running? by ajakk · · Score: 1

      From Netcraft:

      www.wto.org

      www.wto.org is running Netscape-Enterprise/3.5.1C on DIGITAL UNIX

    2. Re:What OS is the WTO site running? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Redshit? So effing lame!

  43. Yngwie Malmsteen and Jens Johansson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No music beats listening to Yngwie *J* Malmsteen
    and Jens Johansson playing together (plus Anders
    Johansson on drums..)

    1. Re:Yngwie Malmsteen and Jens Johansson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      THat whole gendra is passe

  44. Hippies sux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank god the 60s are over.

  45. little guys ganging up on the big guys ?? by bug1 · · Score: 1

    did you think about that beofre your wrote it ?

    Are you trying to make out like the big guys have something to worry about ?

    Im sorry but your comments just reek of arogance.

    Technology is so powerfull, it can make a real difference to those that dont have it (e.g. communications), 2 and a half years ago i got told the total international network bandwidth for sri-lanka was 64Kb/s !

    And your worried that you might have to pay more for your sneakers?

    Yea, like all the little countries gang up and rip the international e-commerce market from the US.

    Dont worry mate, im sure you wont be out of pocket.

    1. Re:little guys ganging up on the big guys ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you bother to read before you posted? The US has one of the most liberal plans for the Internet at the momment. The little guys don't like the plan of no taxation on the internet. They don't want to get mauled by US companies that are way ahead of them. They are small remeber, they need more time to work. Anyway, we still need our slave-labor work force (e.g. those .33 cent per $200 garment GAP sweatshop workers) so we can have the newest trend in style. Also, as the original poster pointed out, IP is a big product of the US. I don't really see anything wrong with it either. Yes it is abused, but the abuses are corrected by the judicial system (eventually -- what a surprise). If /.'ers saw an IP'free world, I'm sure they'd run back to this one in a heart beat after they realized that the IP free world was ages behind. Like it or not, a lot of modern development (software, medicine, etc) are thanks to IP. Without it, much of those products would not exist.

  46. I'm information and I want to be free by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 1

    Meaningless, kind of like "water wants to run downhill" or "genes want to reproduce"?

    It's not to be taken literally. If you want to get anal about it, the correct phrase would be "in any given information network, where there are few or no barriers to information flow, information will tend to distribute to the greatest possible extent until demand for that information is satisfied.

    Anyways, I much prefer Bruce Sterling's rebuttal: "Information wants you to give me a dollar".

  47. Some definitions (was Re:Untold Damage, my god!) by MAXOMENOS · · Score: 2
    • Liberal: anyone who believes in: the environment, gay rights, women's rights, abortion rights, religious freedom (for more than the Christian Right), and/or an economic safety net.
    • Goddamn Stinking Liberal: anyone who can back up these beliefs with evidence, logic, or legal reasoning.
    • Radical: a Goddamn Stinking Liberal who acts on these beliefs, in order to affect social change.
    • Communist: a Radical without a suit.
    • Unballanced dangerous Communist: a Radical or Communist with a concealed carry permit and/or an NRA membership (or equivalent).
    • Terrorist: a Radical who ties up traffic for more than two minutes.
    • Treasonist: a Radical who disagrees with the government's policies as the government is implementing said policies will full vigor.

    The Kulturwehrmacht
  48. Hippy Joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hippies, they smell like cheetah and look like Jane!

  49. It's not all about countries by Bearpaw · · Score: 2
    If you're looking at this only in the context about "little countries" vs "big countries", you're missing a very large part of the picture. Try also thinking about it in terms of the basic goals of multinational corporations, what results would strengthen their bottom lines, and how they might be able to influence those results.

    Follow the money.

  50. You must be talking about "Trustafarians" ;-) by cpeterso · · Score: 2

    Those trust fund kiddies playing rastafarian.

  51. Seattle is locking down. by cpeterso · · Score: 2

    I live in Seattle and there are (according to police estimates on the local news) 3000-6000 protesters downtown. The city expects 50,000 people by weeks end. WAT teams and police in riot gear have blocked the streets near the Seattle Convention Center. They have built barricades using city busses, but protesters have climbed on top of the busses. Many downtown intersections have been "owned" by protesters, too, and traffic is blocked. There have only been a few arrests, but the news estimates that protesters outnumber police 10:1.

    1. Re:Seattle is locking down. by MAXOMENOS · · Score: 2

      Speaking frankly, I'd be very frightened to be a protester in Seattle right now. It's only a hunch, but I think things might get a lot uglier in Seattle by week's end...

      At the risk of getting off-topic, I'd be very interested if native Seattlers could keep us informed about the situation in Seattle. After alll, what good is the "new media" of Internet if we can't get first-hand, unedited accounts of world events?


      The Kulturwehrmacht
  52. Seattle Police attack peacefull protest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The SPD used rubber bullets, tear gas and batons against a peacefull protest. This was an unprovocted attack. The protesters are letting there voices be heard and the Government only wants to silence them. Thees are violations of our basic rights to freedom of assembly and freedom of speech. By noon 50,000 people will be in the streets , We will not be silenced!

    1. Re:Seattle Police attack peacefull protest by Stonehand · · Score: 2

      Tell that to the McDonald's owner whose store got smashed up. Tell that to the delegates getting attacked. Tell that to the businesses whom these protestors block...

      Peaceful? Nope. Legal? Nope. Not when it involves assault, B&E, destruction of property...

      --
      Only the dead have seen the end of war.
    2. Re:Seattle Police attack peacefull protest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      look for your self.... H ERE

    3. Re:Seattle Police attack peacefull protest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or the guy who owns the warehouse the protesters took over, or the people who are basically locked in their buildings downtown, etc, etc...I live in Seattle, and it appears to me that the WTO is simply an excuse for all the crazies to come out and wreak havoc.

    4. Re:Seattle Police attack peacefull protest by MAXOMENOS · · Score: 2
      Tell that to the McDonald's owner whose store got smashed up. Tell that to the delegates getting attacked. Tell that to the businesses whom these protestors block.

      I'll grant you that violent protest is unacceptible .. and that's just what smashing a McDonald's or attacking delegates is, violent. People who conduct themselves in such a manner should be arrested, prosecuted, and sentenced to hard time.

      But if you think I'm going to shed tear one for anyone who has been inconvenienced by these protests, you've got to be kidding. In fact, a lot of these businesses are looking foreward to the revenue generated by all these out-of-town protesters. As far as anyone having a longer commute, or having a business slowdown -- speaking as a working stiff myself, why the hell not? Life goes on. Convenience is no more an inalienable right than having a big-screen TV in your living room.


      The Kulturwehrmacht
    5. Re:Seattle Police attack peacefull protest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Peacefull my ass. I also live in Seattle, and I've seen what the protestors can do. It looks like to me most of them are here to insite a roit and see what they can steal. BTW, the WTO does suck. They need to get their noses out of international trade.

    6. Re:Seattle Police attack peacefull protest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Are you stupid? No one in seattle wants these damn protestors. Schools are being shutdown, Metro(bus) service is being canceled, retail stores are closing there doors, regular businesses are telling workers not to come in. Police department had to shell out a extra 2 million to protect the city. Its costing the city millions and millions of dollars.

      They even vandalized the local university by drilling rock climbing anchors into the brick clock tower.

    7. Re:Seattle Police attack peacefull protest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Peaceful march my ass. I'm from seattle and these marches are not friendly, they attacked a police car this weekend and vandalized it, they vandalized the sides of buildings. This is our city, we pay taxes for these damages. And I say we arrest all these protesters and thrown into the Kingdome. They are disrupting traffic, closing down businesses and causing the city lose money.

      People do have a right to a PEACEFUL assembly, but that doesn't including rioting at McDonalds, hanging yourself off of PRIVATELY owned buildings, drawing the anarchy symbol on building walls, trespassing, and disrupting our city.

      Also read the laws about riots, if ab order to disperse is given and crowd doesn't disperse. The police have every right to use any means to disperse the crowd. The protestors are damn lucky they didn't pull out the cork guns that are designed to break legs.

  53. Slight addendum by Demona · · Score: 1
    • Like "hacker", "nigger", or any other label, the word "hippie" has a wide and varied meaning depending on context, and can be positive or negative.
    • While the popular image of hippies as ones who would completely abolish the idea of privately owned property, many have in fact worked within that context of rights, seeking instead to empower individuals despite the various constraints placed upon them by nation-states, corporate entities and thieves, control freaks, etc. not already working for the latter groups: Co-ops, voluntary standards for organic foods, private/local currencies, fighting the War on Some Drugs from the FDA to the CIA, and more.
    • As another poster noted, much of the harm done by this sort of thing is in the secrecy. And as Justice Brandeis noted, "a little sunlight is the best disinfectant." They claim we have nothing to hide? Let's make sure their inner workings are given complete public exposure.
    The American Indians had a conception of property, just as Richard Stallman does. The difference between them and today's tribe of suits, pinks and lawyer-sharks that seek so much control and deep scrutiny over every last detail of the lives of "the rest of us" is, I think, readily apparent. Frank Zappa 's autobiography, "The Real Frank Zappa Book", noted:

    In every language, the first word after "Mama!" that every kid learns to say is "Mine!" A system that doesn't allow ownership, that doesn't allow you to say "Mine!" when you grow up, has -- to put it mildly -- a fatal design flaw.

    Actually, to be slightly closer, I think of Robert Fripp as the Richard Stallman of the music world, and Frank Zappa as its Eric Raymond.

    Male, female, any color, yadda -- vive la difference! But despite the value of individuality, let's not lose sight of our essential similarities -- definitely where we should be focusing our attention if we want to improve the way we interact. Life isn't a zero-sum game...or at least, it doesn't have to be.

    Peace and prosperity to y'all, in all your honest endeavors.

    --
    Fuck Slashdot
    1. Re:Slight addendum by Hard_Code · · Score: 2

      "The American Indians had a conception of property, just as Richard Stallman does."

      Actually, IIRC, very few Native American tribes really had a concept of individual property that even came close to what we now think of as "property" (maybe closer Stallman's concept though ;). One couldn't own land or objects any more than one could own the sky. This was to some extent, I believe, because of the acknowledgement that humans were owned by earth and nature and not the other way around. Although they traded, their cultures were not predicated on it, or on the idea of individually owned property. It took European invasion to make a capitalist individual-ownership arrangement a necessity of survival. And what has it got them today? The crutches of casinos and life-sucking capitalism. The hand that holds is the hand that holds them down.

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
    2. Re:Slight addendum by Hard_Code · · Score: 2

      ergghh...

      s/life-sucking capitalism/life-sucking commercialism/g

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
    3. Re:Slight addendum by Demona · · Score: 1
      Heh, thanks for your clarification.

      Ken Kesey says, "Take what you can use, and let the rest go by." The excesses of the modern age are hardly wholly due to the concepts of natural rights and ownership of property. Sure, most commercials drive me nuts -- I try not to watch 'em, and the few that are good can be enjoyed on many levels without succumbing to the mindset that one is not complete unless one Buys and Consumes. And as shown in many past discussions here, a lot of problems can be traced to passive and/or active stupidity and/or malevolence by the PHB's of the world and their underlings -- as well as the "ordinary people" who cooperate to further enslave their fellows or sit back and let it happen.

      It's a shame that the Indians have had to "resort" to casinos (argh! the pun!), but only because they've been backed into a corner (IIRC, every treaty the United States government has ever made with the Indians has been broken...hardly a good example of equal rights, respecting contracts/one's word, etc). Ideally, neither they nor anyone else would get special privileges from the state, but merely overseen enough to prosecute fraud or other true criminal activity.

      Karl: "A good friend, good lover, good neighbor."

      Questioner: "That's all there is to being an anarchist?"

      Karl: "What did you expect, a bunch of rules?"

      - Karl Hess, 1923-1994

      --
      Fuck Slashdot
    4. Re:Slight addendum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The term hippie can have a negative connotation? Really? How strange that I've never heard it as such, especially being one myself.

    5. Re:Slight addendum by dbrutus · · Score: 1

      Actually, that would be life-sucking socialism. The dole has sucked all the entrepreneurial life out of the reservations. And talk about big government paternalism, have you ever heard about the 'trust account' scandal? They can't even figure out how many millions of indian dollars were stolen by government agents and how many were simply lost.

      Indians in the reservation system have limits on their ability to start their own firms, mortgage their land (ownership must be tribal, not individual) and there is always the Bureau of Indian Affairs to kill off anything that smacks of commercial success.

      Just ask yourself, would you start up a .com firm on reservation land? Why not? *THAT* is why the indians are in sad shape today.

      DB

    6. Re:Slight addendum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, now you have. I have a negative connotation of hippies.

    7. Re:Slight addendum by Hard_Code · · Score: 2

      "Ideally, neither they nor anyone else would get
      special privileges from the state, but merely overseen enough to prosecute fraud or other true criminal activity."

      Or better yet, sovereignty that they never gave up, but was forced away from them. Every casino, and every federal-sponsored puppet government, erodes more on their sovereignty. They managed to live for eons before europeans came over - now all of a sudden they can manage their own affairs and the money the U.S. government owes them has to be held in escrow accounts (for their good of course) never to see the light of day? I say give them back their sovereignty. Canada did this a log time ago. The U.S. should grow up, instead of trying to hide it nasty past be pretending Native Americans don't exist.

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
  54. Re:Yngwie Malmsteen and Jens Johansson and Bach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thats like saying Bach and Beethoven are passe

    Have you heard Jens Johansson's 10 Seasons cd? It's the most beautiful piano playing I've ever heard in my life...

    And Yngwie's Orchestral suite.. both works are pure genious...

  55. A better attack by wtanaka · · Score: 1

    Said hippies would probably get a lot more traction by opening sockets and not sending any requests. Somehow I doubt that this is possible in javascript's normal security sandbox.

    The TCP sockets available on a machine would probably run out far before the machine had problems serving normal web browser hits.

    It would certainly allow those "with slow connections" to have more of an effect.

  56. Triump of the NERDS!!!!!!! by Nexeslad · · Score: 0

    Finnaly geeks will have a cause that is worth fighting for. Nerds will become rebels, and chicks dig rebels :-)

    --
    Do not wright in this space.
  57. Too much electro-acid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Seems the modern electro-hippies are as mentally deficient as their '60s forebears.

    From their website it seems that their "virtual sit-in" consists of encouraging people to load the WTO web page and then "stay online as long as possible". Hmmmmmm.... so I load the web page and then....?!?

    Perhaps if they encouraged people to switch off caching and reload the page as often as possible they might actually tax the server. Instead there are going to be a lot of wasted compute cycles on the "activists" local machines as they render a static image for hours on end.

    This kind of idiocy doesn't exactly lend credibility to whatever their actual arguments are. Just the idea of a "virtual sit-in" seems lame - the ultimate armchair activism - but at least if you're gonna do it, do it right!

    Al

  58. Link by MAXOMENOS · · Score: 2

    As a service to those who are bad at cutting and pasting:
    http://www.zmag.org/Cris esCurEvts/Globalism/GlobalEcon.htm


    The Kulturwehrmacht

  59. Tear gas by James+Lanfear · · Score: 1

    Well, Fox News is reporting the cops have been using tear gas in places, and there've been more arrests. As you said, things are getting uglier.

  60. Is this right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    It may just be me, but trying to take down a Web site simply because you don't believe in their messages or intrests doesn't seem right.

    Perhaps we should *ahem* slashdot the electrohippie site, since there are many here who don't agree with their actions. Anyone care to make a page with six frames loading and refreshing electrohippie pages?

    (Yes I know, two wrongs don't make a right -- this is more hypothetical than a call for action)

    ScrO

  61. and 20,000 more protesters at AFL-CIO rally. by cpeterso · · Score: 2

    There are about 3000-6000 protesters in downtown Seattle, but 20,000 more people now at Memorial Stadium for a huge rally and parade. The parade planned for this afternoon expects between 20,000 and 50,000 marchers. My previous comment about "50,000 people by week's end" was wrong. Expect 50,000 people by this afternoon.

    More info from Wired: Tear Gas Debuts at WTO.

  62. Sit-in count by Hard_Code · · Score: 2

    Um, is there a sit-in counter?

    I have a T1 and I'd like to know if there are already hundreds of people doing this, or if the WTO is going to call me tomorrow saying that my IP accounts for 80% of their 100x overloaded web traffic.

    --

    It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
    1. Re:Sit-in count by Hard_Code · · Score: 2

      ok, this is just lame...
      i'm not going to clog up our network...

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
  63. 90's Hippie Hypocrisy - I'm not surprised by gad_zuki! · · Score: 3

    I don't see how this even comes near the definition of a 'sit-in.' All they're doing is trying their best to crash the WTO web server. Which isn't at all like demanding to be served as much as it is a lot like silencing your opponents.
    Lets say the WTO wanted to post something important or *gasp* something critical about eHippies on their page. Too bad, because all these well-meaning brain-donors are busy clogging up the works. This effectivly turns into a free speech issue. The only speech allowed now is eHippies speech.

    You'd think hippie liberalism would include such comforts as free speech, but then again the word hippie is synonymous with hypocrisy, now add the 90's marketing catch-letter 'e' and you've got the makings of a brand new 21st century stupidity.

    Imagine if this caught on, fundies organizing on-line and jamming talk-origins.org. Anyone seriously thinking of joining this should consider what happens when others try to silence you.

    1. Re:90's Hippie Hypocrisy - I'm not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      > You'd think hippie liberalism would include such comforts as free speech,

      Having had the (dis)pleasure of working for someone who "came of age in the 60s" and claimed never to have left his hippie roots...

      > but then again the word hippie is synonymous with hypocrisy,

      ...I can assure you that - at least for the ex-employer in question - you're absolutely correct.

      The chap did all the right drugs, worshipped the ground the Grateful Dead, Jimi Hendrix, and Janis Joplin walked on, and could do a pretty nice jam on the guitar whenever the feeling suited him, and basically continued to live the hippie lifestyle from his youth right through to the present day.

      If, however, you ever said anything he disagreed with, or pissed him off in any one of a million insignificant ways, you were history. To quote him, in reference to a contractor who - when never provided with specifications until two days after the go-live date for a project - asked to be paid for overtime because of the resultant 80-hour week:

      Quoth my ex-boss:

      "That fucking asshole, that fucking gen-x slacker son of a bitch, where the fuck does he fucking get off fucking trying to destroy everything I've fucking built from the fucking ground up, fuck him, YOU HEAR ME, FUCK HIM, I WANT HIM THE FUCK OUTA HERE! I DON'T EVER WANNA SEE HIS FUCKING FACE AGAIN!"

      As he continued to rant, he became physically agitated, pounding his fist on the desk and scattering papers everywhere. During this display, I was the only person in the room. I was wholly unrelated to what this contractor had done, and yet I still feared for my physical safety.

      Ever since that display, I've believed that whenever an X-er (or younger) deals with someone in their mid-40s who professes to still hold the hippie ethos, it's vital to remember that "peace, love, and understanding" were only ever intended to apply to other hippies. Anyone not of the hippie generation, or who doesn't smoke the right drugs, or invoke whatever hippie shibboleths need to be invoked, is merely cannon fodder.

      To quote hippie scripture: "If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the problem". It's the same old "us-versus-them" rhetoric, and whether it's dressed up in a tie-dye T-shirt and carries a bong, or wears a suit and carries a Montblanc pen makes no difference. Frankly, given the choice between dealing with my "hippie" ex-boss and a bond trader of the same age who at least has the courage to admit he sold out for a BMW and a trophy wife, I'll drink beer with the bond trader every time.

      (P.S. And to the ex-boss in question: You do realize that while I disagree with the War on Some Drugs for economic reasons, you're the best poster boy for the WoSD that "The Man" could ever hope for. Put that in your bong and smoke it.)

    2. Re:90's Hippie Hypocrisy - I'm not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The same 90s that brought GreedStock, attempting to turn the good name of Woodstock into capitalist profit. :( You are correct, this decades justifies cynicism.

      There ARE some who still live the old ideals however. I just saw one again the other night after not being in touch for a couple of years. A refreshing moment, I assure you.

    3. Re:90's Hippie Hypocrisy - I'm not surprised by barleyguy · · Score: 1

      You seem to be using using the example of a single person to stereotype and label a larger group. I wish, for your own benefit, that you weren't so shallow. You can't judge a group of people based on one person. Not all hippies are bad. Some of them are wonderful selfless people who really do apply their beliefs to everyone equally. Every group of people has a few assholes. There are asshole hippies, asshole jocks, asshole nerds, etc. But try not to stereotype an entire group of people based on a single example, because that's just plain stupid.

      --
      --- "So THAT's what an invisible barrier looks like!" - Time Bandits
  64. MODERATORS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please jack up the above comment and its predecessor a point or two.... this is a very interesting and relatively-unexplored perspective.

  65. Freedom=censorship by briancarnell · · Score: 1

    "The idea is pretty revolutionary I guess, but I've considered the Internet the battle ground for freedom for a long time already."

    We're going to fight for freedom on the Internet by shutting down web sites we disagree with? I thought we had the FBI to do that for us.

  66. not i don't want to get off on a rant here but ... by nostrodecus · · Score: 1

    have a close look at all the people who are opposed to the WTO, be they electrohippies,
    buchananites, traditional tree hugging hippies, pampered over-paid owners in
    protected industries. what they are really against is change. the change that
    the net and the communications revolution has brought, is scaring the shit out
    of them, because they don't understand it. but rather than try to make sense of
    the world as it is becoming, they are dreamily looking back at a happier time when
    we could all live together in harmony. and so the wto is evil and is destroying
    "our way of life". well bull shit. my taxes are paying to keep farmers in the mid
    west on the land just so i can pay more for what they produce than if i bought
    stuff grown in south america. the motto of the old order is "what we have, we hold".
    the motto that was presented to me as part of my tekkie training is "adapt or die".
    free trade (and the wto) is good because it favours the dynamic, adaptive, free.
    you give me all the choices and all the information, then i'll decide if i want to
    pay more for something manifactured right here, and how much more. how would you
    feel if you were only allowed buy computers assembled in oregon and chips made
    in san diego. fine you'd think, except you'd still be paying $5000 for a 386.

    --
    cloak of invisibility not working, there are squirrels everywhere
  67. Update: by Mandoric · · Score: 2

    According to the AP, the Seattle Police used TearGas on the protesters.

    Ehh... just mentioning it.

    1. Re:Update: by coryking · · Score: 0

      I can attest to this, living in Seattle. I Just got back from the protests downtown about 1hr ago.

      There was a *huge* march. There are many people blocking the intersections downtown. Lots of broken glass, spray painted anarchy symbols, etc.

      Yes the police did use tear gas to clear a corridor for the conference attendies to make their way to our convention center. This I saw (and breathed) with my own eyes. They also have used their rubber bullet guns.

      I did not see what lead up to the use of the gas though. Some people say they did it for "no reason, they just got trigger happy". Whatever, I don't know.

      Regardless of the CNN or whoever says, It's pretty peacefull down here. It's just a bit crowded, thats all

      All an all, it's pretty crazy here today in Downtown Seattle, I used 1 1/2 rolls of film, and hope to take more pics and put them up on the net within a few days.

  68. Terry Pratchett put it rather well... by Paul+Johnson · · Score: 2
    ... in "The Light Fantastic" the anti-hero Rincewind is talking to the anthropomorphic personification Death about some religious fanatics:

    "Its horrible," said Rincewind.

    "I'M INCLINED TO AGREE" said Death.

    "I would have thought you'd be all for it!"

    "NOT LIKE THIS. THE DEATH OF THE WARRIOR OR THE OLD MAN OR THE LITTLE CHILD, THIS I UNDERSTAND, AND I TAKE AWAY THE PAIN AND END THE SUFFERING. I DO NOT UNDERSTNAND THIS DEATH-OF-THE-MIND".

    Paul.

    --
    You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
  69. And censorship too. by Paul+Johnson · · Score: 3
    This is a denial of service attack. Plain and simple.

    Its also censorship. These people are explicitly attempting to prevent others from reading the WTO's point of view because they happen to disagree with it.

    When colored folks sat down in a diner and refused the leave, the diner was the only business that was affected.

    Also unaffected was the ability of the owner to argue his own case. Here, however, the aim is to deny the WTO its ability to speak.

    Paul.

    --
    You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
  70. DoS for dummies.....emphasis on DUMB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This has got to be the most low tech, stupid DoS I have ever heard of.
    "To take part in the sit-in all you have to do is load the appropriate web page and leave you computer online for a period of time; the longer the better!" ... from the electohippies webpage


    Ok so your going to the load the web page into your browser once and sit there, wow that does a lot. Sending one request to a server won't do anything, unless the server dynamically updates itself (which as far as I can tell the WTO's page dosen't).
    These guys are so dumb that it makes me want to do a SYN flood on their webserver.



    Which brings up an interesting point is a DoS illegal? I know actully breaking into a system is, but is a DoS illegal? And if it is what separates a SYN flood DoS from a bunch of idiots opening a webpage in their browser, or from the slashdot effect for that matter?

  71. Rubber Bullets? by MAXOMENOS · · Score: 2
    Well, Fox News is reporting the cops have been using tear gas in places, and there've been more arrests. As you said, things are getting uglier.

    It gets even better. Apparently the police are now also using rubber bullets. To quote the report from ZNet:

    Seattle, WA, Tuesday, 11/30/1999 -- Despite CNN's reports that no rubber bullets have been used, the Indy Media Center has several witnesses that saw police firing this morning outside the WTO's meeting place. Despite one protester struck with a rubber bullet, and accounts of at least one more, Seattle police denied using rubber bullets and tear gas on CNN this morning.

    Oliver De Marcellus, a 56-year-old activist with People's Global Action, visiting from Geneva, says a rubber bullet shattered the right lens of his glasses. Witnesses report that a rubber bullet also struck a nearby man in the head.

    The police have put the entire city on red alert. Volunteer medics are calling for more eyewash for protesters affected by the gas.


    The Kulturwehrmacht
    1. Re:Rubber Bullets? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      tear gas != pepper spray rubber bullet != paint ball Check out the pics on CNN. That's not a gun for rubber bullets. That's a freakin' paintball gun. ZNet comes off like HUAC. "When did you stop beating your wife?"

    2. Re:Rubber Bullets? by James+Lanfear · · Score: 1

      *sigh*

      I'll say this slowly: Fox News says the cops are using tear gas. They also have video of big clouds of what doesn't look much like pepper spray, coming out of grenades the cops are tossing. It just might be that they're using both, eh?

      As for the paintball gun, you're right, it is.

    3. Re:Rubber Bullets? by GPB · · Score: 1

      From http://www.cnn.com/US/9911/30/wto.03/:

      The use of pepper spray creates a smoke-like fog that resembles tear gas, but police said they did not use tear gas. They also denied reports they used rubber bullets.

      And yes, that picture shows a cop holding a paintball gun. Who would you rather believe; CNN, or Fox News? I know who I would choose.

      -B in Seattle
    4. Re:Rubber Bullets? by James+Lanfear · · Score: 1

      Pepper gas != pepper spray. I apologize for assuming the correct terminology would be used, or that people would know what a 'spray' is.

      Incidentally, the Fox story was considerably older than the CNN story; IIRC, from several hours before any statement had been made by the police, while it was happening. They can be forgiven for not wanting to sample the gas to see what it was.

      Who would you rather believe; CNN, or Fox News?

      I can't believe you seriously asked that; I'm relying on KIRO at the moment. However, given the choice between CNN and Fox--having watched the coverage from both--Fox is well ahead at this point.

      -J, who would like to be home in Seattle, but is trapped in Oregon (the riot capital of the NW!).

    5. Re:Rubber Bullets? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quick follow up (no pw on this machine), since I forgot to mention a few things:

      Pepper gas is tear gas. It isn't C[SN] gas, but it does cause tearing, thus....

      Oh yeah, KIRO's latest says the cops were using "tear gas", so I guess you can bite me ;-)

      -James

  72. hippies? don't feed me your bull by zerocool^ · · Score: 1

    Let me tell you something about hippies:
    I am 18 years old. Im not a hippie. i don't buy in to the BS about the romanticism of the 60's. I know i wasn't there, my mom wasn't even there, but this whole idea of "hippies" in the 90's is really stupid. This is a stupid idea. A DOS attack is illegal. Ask anyone in #zt. And these people aren't hippies.
    Sex, drugs, and rock and roll! Tell me where internet fits into that. This is just advertisement by name association. Put the word "hippie" here and people will think its "cute" and "retro" Hippies to me seem the kind of people who go backpacking and pick flowers, not write java web pages to do DOS attacks for their own personal benifit.

    As for real hippies, sex drugs and rock and roll is now safe sex, no drugs, and hell, rock is as commercial as it gets now. These people went from free love to abstenince and from "do your own thing" to "just say no!". They've sold out.
    So don't clutter up my screen with 60's romanticism and internet in the same sentance. So, if you want to be a hippie, go hug a tree, and if you want to attack the WTO, bomb the building, but get out of the way of us who have grown up.
    Even if we are younger.
    ~Zero

    --
    sig?
    1. Re:hippies? don't feed me your bull by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I sit in the woods (after hiking, yes) and write code in a notebook. Other than that, so what?

      Your idea of "hippies" seems to have nothing to do with the reality which we live. Try living in someones shoes before making ridiculous genralizations.

    2. Re:hippies? don't feed me your bull by mrhuman · · Score: 1

      "The name comes from a discussion within the group where as a joke someone said that we'd be called a 'load of electrical hippies' by the media - and the name stuck. (http://www.gn.apc.org/pmhp/ ehippies/action/prelease.htm)"

      I just wanted to point out that discussions regarding the name are fairly inane on closer inspection.

    3. Re:hippies? don't feed me your bull by KlomDark · · Score: 1
      So basically you are saying "Do what you're told, even if it is completely wrong"?

      You youngsters are so brainwashed by the media you never had the chance to learn how to think for yourself.

  73. You moron (was Re:Too much electro-acid...) by Zonker+Harris · · Score: 1

    Uhhhh...that's what they're doing. If you would have acutally looked at the page, you would have seen it reloads 12 different pages within frames over and over.

    --

    Zonker Harris "There is not, nor ought there be, any food more exalted on the face of god's grey earth, than that
  74. The problem with hippies and the problem with this by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 3
    Anybody who's read some history on the 60s knows it was a time of utter, total lusers on both sides. Some noticed this, and some didn't.

    Remember the Mothers of Invention? Frank Zappa noticed- and produced a lot of music to try (and fail) to shake up a lot of people who, quote, "mindlessly accepted everything they were given, without questioning it". That was the hippies, to Zappa.

    Woodstock was paid for entirely by John Roberts. Remember that name, or Joel Rosenman's? John Roberts financed the whole festival, having been conned to believe it was a moneymaking venture, originally put forth as a 'press party' for a recording studio to be built. Roberts pretty well had a breakdown while the festival was happening- left totally responsible, far in debt, being asked to sign checks for which there was no money anymore, Roberts and a few other people took the whole load of the Woodstock Festival upon themselves, a festival that was declared free after it had already eaten through Roberts' entire inheritance.

    The whole hippie concept is a story of rip-off, stealing, lying, and destruction, painted to appear as virtue and freedom. Virtually nothing was accomplished- the end of the war in Vietnam, for instance, owes much more to the fact that eventually Middle America was sick of it and wanted it stopped, and to Nixon's bid for re-election.

    Having hippie idealism on the Net is a bad thing. It's spelled out quite obviously: "Let's march on Website X and stomp it with DOS attacks!". No thought is given to other services that may be hosted on that computer, no interest is taken in the additional load produced by X many lusers running a Javascript program and monopolizing all the network links to the target. The idea of responsibility is seriously lacking here.

    It's like a riot in cyberspace: riots were seen as civil disobedience in the 60s. My generation saw them more clearly: "Tomorrow you're homeless- tonight it's a gas" -The Dead Kennedys

    Rioting is not freedom. Rioting is collectively throwing a fit. If you want civil disobedience, "smash the right windows" (Lee Felsenstein)- get smart, intrude, change their web page, don't just riot in the cyberstreet smashing everything. Stupidity is not insulation, it will not protect you.

    If you want FREEDOM, then write fscking software! This is the most annoying aspect of all this. DOSing a site that happens to contain something you don't like is freedom? Write software, GPL it (or BSD license it depending on if you don't want to _enforce_ the availability of the code), put it out there. That does more for freedom than any twelve hippie web pages. If you are a blackhat at heart, learn how to pull off intrusions into whatever's out there, get good at the surgical strike, be smart enough to spare the environment you're in while punishing your enemies. That's harder, of course: a lot harder, in fact. But there's no excuse for the hippie approach. It's a disaster, a mess! Fight smart or go do bong hits, if you can't get a clue then get out of the way.

    Otherwise you might well find that the GenXers (_my_ generation, thank you) have very much their own opinions on what activism is. You might find that they take a dim view of mindless destroying to prove some vague point. You might find some GenXer who's done his or her homework sneaking onto your precious target site and setting up some sort of viral attack from Javascript on the site itself- which itself attacks the site, but also whacks all the idiot DoSers in the bargain.

    Hippies are the Commodore 64s of making change happen. It's time to move on. It's time to get _serious_. For example, the GNU GPL uses the law and copyright to attack what copyright is _normally_ used for, and Linux takes the GPL and proliferates it wildly- now there is a huge amount of Linux out there, and it's got the legal backing to fight attempts to subvert what it stands for. Now that's change. That's _significant_ and it matters and it's constructive but uncompromising.

    Forget the hippie approach. Go with the Linux approach. Build something good and be ready to protect it.

  75. Re:Yngwie Malmsteen and Jens Johansson and Bach by aithien · · Score: 1

    Genious?! You've got to be kidding me... anybody with too much practice could play as cold and fast as him. He may be fast, but his rhythm structures are whacked, they show no understanding of the true nature of the nuances of volume of fluid time structures. Not to mention the fact that using augmented and minor chords over and over doesn't make "classical music". He does nothing more than go thru classical-like progressions with that shred crap. It's embarrasing and quite gay. Besides the lead guitarist from Cannibal Corpse would eat his ass out for breakfast, if you are looking for speed. Putting Malmsteen on the level of Bach or Beethoven is ludicrous. I admit that I find some of their compositions mundane, but at least they evoke some sense of the ephemeral emotions and archetypal scenes that classical music is intended to invoke. Going thru some chords and shredding scales fast, does NOT make you a viable contender in that arena.

  76. hey hippies: heard lately from jimi hindrix? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has Mama Cass said anything about freedom lately?
    What's the latest word from JFK about equality?
    Not a fucking thing, i guarantee you.
    know why? They're ALL DEAD
  77. The Final Solution by tomwhore · · Score: 1

    "lets sell them a fake ideology, clothing fads, musical groups and a phrase book so they can all say only the same 12 catch phrases."

    Yes its Hippie time again. Hippies, lets look back at thier legacy.

    Free Sex-------Spread of aids and other STDS

    Free Thought----Political Correctness and New Speak

    Help The Poor---All the Top Hippies sold out or caved in.

    Think For Yourself--A blind observence of being the same as every other hippie in thought, action and dress.

    Evolve---a 30 year stagnation of mind and body so much so that they take a glee in making thier chidrens children in thier mold and thus not offering them evolution but a hang me down dead end.

    So if you calssify yourself as hippie, technohippie or the ilk...welcome to being part of the problem.

    Peace Love and Get A Clue

    --
    Poor little clams! Snap! Snap! Snap! Poor little clams! Snap! Snap! Snap! Poor little clams! Snap! Snap! Snap!
  78. well, I do. by Jovian · · Score: 1
    The adaptions that seem to be working best right now is making decent products really cheaply by using workers in countries where you _don't have to respect civil rights_, using natural resources that are in very limited supply, in an environmentally harmful manner.

    Hey, bring on the 386's. We can stand a couple less flops in order to prevent this from happening.

    1. Re:well, I do. by nostrodecus · · Score: 1

      which would be a very valid point except that if you take away trade, you think these people are going to suddenly start respecting civil rights, stop using natural resources and set to work undoing the damage they have already done to the enviromnment. and aren't we doing a fabulous job here on civil rights, resource conservation and a clean environment.

      --
      cloak of invisibility not working, there are squirrels everywhere
    2. Re:well, I do. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure we aren't doing enough, but at least we are doing something. That is why quite a few of the anti-wto websites I've visted have said that it isn't a good idea to boycott the sweat-shop abusing companies (GAP, JCPenny, Disney, etc...). However, I think the protests are valid. If I pay $50 for a sweater at the GAP, I honestly would like to know how they can only afford to pay the over-worked third-world employee only 33 cents for it. Something is wrong there. And that 33 cents they pay isn't enough for a decent living in that country, its usually 1/3 of whats required. I have no problem with Free Trade, however I do have problems with this chain of monetary transactions. The other point others have brought up is hte fact that the WTO has the power to overturn democratically instated laws.

  79. bullshit by CrAlt · · Score: 2

    I was watching CNN around noon, they had tons of video of the cops beating the people with nightsticks and shooting into the crowed with those rubber bullets. They also showed teargas. And while they are playing the video they have the head of the police on the phone saing how they would not use teargas and rubber bullets.

    Then a hour later they stopped playing that video and only played video of them using pepper spray.
    hmm...

    --
    I have to return some videotapes...
    1. Re:bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ABC News showed it just now, on the evening news ... the real, heavy-duty, is this the 60s again, vicious attacks of the pigs on the protestors, yep!

  80. 60s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quoting David Weinberger from http://www.hyperorg.com/current/current.html ************** "60s Recidivism "My teenaged daughter cracked open my old Bob Dylan tapes recently and I found myself listening to "The Ballad of a Thin Man " for the first time in probably two decades. What a great song. Pathetic Mr. Jones meets various Dylanesque freaks who let him know that he's the real freak now so he knows something is happenin' here but he just doesn't know what it is, does he, Mr. Jones? It's a bitter song of victory, rubbing The Man's nose in his loss. But now, it's 30 years since the song was written, and who's Mr. Jones and who's the freak? "Y'know, rock and roll used to be rebellious, not the background music for Chevy ads and elevator rides. Doesn't that make us Mr. Jones? Maybe that's why the Web's biggest enthusiasts and prime movers are aging 60s types. Maybe we see the Web as a way to avoid becoming Mr. Jones, a second chance for the revolution that got co-opted ... that we let get co-opted. "The 60s revolution may have succeeded in small ways but the fundamental fabric of American life is as it always was. We work during the day and play at night. We live in houses and pay mortgages. We do things we don't like to make more money than we need. We all dress pretty much alike. We raise children who think we don't understand them. "The Web is giving us a second chance. It's easy on the Web to say what you want in your own way of saying it. It's easy to be outrageous for the sheer adolescent joy of it. It's easy to start conversations through that literally span the globe and which remove the barriers of race, gender, class ... although speaking English still counts for a lot. The 60s ideals of equality, openness, connection, invention, play all are so easy to accomplish on the Web. "All these things were so hard to accomplish in the 60s whose downfall was, in one sense, reality: you have to eat, your family has to eat, it's just too hard to live out of a back pack for the rest of your life. But the Web is a virtual space, not physical. Reality doesn't impinge upon it. It's a world built of human conversations where many of the 60s ideals can finally be realized . "And, best of all, on the Web, no one knows you're Mr. Jones. ******************* Did you note what he lists as 60s ideals: "equality, openness, connection, invention, play"? Does someone reading this thread have a quarrel with those? The folks who invented the word "hippie" had quarrels with those ideals, and some of those on this thread seem to have been taken in by a cynical buzzword inherited from the commercial media. Try harder.

  81. Ya beat them protesters! by CrAlt · · Score: 1

    http://www.indymedia.org/

    has lots of video of cops kicking protesters ass's and shooting them at point blank with rubber bullets and teargas guns.

    And still CNN and MSNBC isnt showing any of this. And they keep saying that they arnt using rubber bullets.

    --
    I have to return some videotapes...
  82. Re:Update: True! Here is non-corporate news site by Randym · · Score: 1
    http://indymedia.org/

    aka http://206.168.174.20/imc/

    See the white puffs of tear gas and hear the terrifying pop of plastic bullet guns in RealVideo here.

    Did you know that, by the Geneva Convention, it's illegal to use tear gas in war, yet nations are allowed to use it on their own citizens? (And guess which well-known state managed to slip *that* in there...?)

    --
    DNA is a Turing machine. You, however, being dynamic and emergent, are not.
  83. WTO Opening "Indefinitely Postponed" by MAXOMENOS · · Score: 2

    It must be a total madhouse in Seattle now. CNN is reporting that the opening ceremonies have been indefinitely postponed due to street protests, but that working sessions of the WTO conference will still be in session.

    Police are denying allegations of tear gas or rubber bullets. Meanwhile, some demonstrators are throwing sticks at the police.

    However, CNN is saying that the violence is concentrated on one area. Not much word on anything else happening.

    You can read the original story on CNN here.

    The Kulturwehrmacht
  84. Colored Folks and Diners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You say:
    When colored folks sat down in a diner and refused the leave, the diner was the only business that was affected.

    The problem with this scenario that you point out is if the colored folks had been decently served, they would have paid for their food and would have moved on. But the white folks didn't want to treat them like regular citizens and denied them service, hence no food, no pay, and they patiently waited, but were refused service.

    So, before you start talking about "colored" folks, I think you need to understand the mechanics of the situation which was an intentional denial of service by "white" folks.

  85. ITS NOT A DOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    The combined effect of it is a DOS. However my action alone in reloading a page every 2 to 3 seconds is not *in and of itself* an attack.

    Its an interesting moral question. In my opinion it falls into the realm of a jury's negation of unjust and immoral law.

    The use of child and slave labor by countries in the WTO cannot be ignored.

    1. Re:ITS NOT A DOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you that stupid that you're going to try arguing that you're not a co-conspirator in a DoS attack when you're reloading the page every 2 to 3 seconds? Get a clue. Certainly no one on /. is going to believe it. You know what's going on so if you want to be cute, have your lawyer give your explanation to the jury and see if you can fool them when they haul your brain damaged ass to court.

  86. idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh that's right, I forgot! Hippies invented drugs. There were no drugs in America before the '60s, till those damn hippies started spreading it around.

  87. SUCCESS!!! by penguinhead · · Score: 1

    It looks like the sit-in was a success! it was open before 3pm (PST) today (30th) and after I participated (only about 50 reloads) the site was totally down for at least an hour so far.

    NO WTO!!!

    --
    "People standing in the middle of the road look like road kill to me." - Linus Torvalds, On Bill Gates
  88. It's not just the multi-nationals who win on trade by dbrutus · · Score: 1

    Romanian peasents can't sell their food (all organic because they can't even afford bio-improved seed or modern feed) to the EU because of that oh-so-noble agricultural protectionism. End result? The west either is going to need to send aid, or the racists, the xenophobes, and the communist nostalgics are going to find a hungry, unemployed, humiliated audience for their hate.

    This scene gets played out in country after country. The rich subsidize their own agriculture and industry and shut out the poor. Look at what the US does to carribean sugar, look at what the EU does to Balkan agriculture, it's all about the rich not allowing the poor to catch up by honest competition in markets where the rich nations aren't really competitive.

    If the WTO goes forward, the multi-nationals will gain benefits, but it's the poor who will finally have a chance to get out from under crippling economic tarrif warfare and gain a respectable, place among the nations.

    DB

  89. Not bullshit at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The Whole World is Watching" sound familiar to anyone?

  90. Wanna-be anarchists roaming the Seattle streets. by cpeterso · · Score: 2

    According to the local Seattle news, the police have admitted to using tear gas on protesters. Some protesters have created human chains to block I-5 freeway entrances. The 20,000 person AFL-CIO march has been very peaceful, but a group of self-proclaimed anarachists are vandalizing downtown. There are about 30 "anarchists", dressed in black hooded sweatshirts and hiding behind gasmasks, smashing store windows (such as GAP and Starbacks) and spraypainting police cars and news cameras! They don't seem to have a cause or message; they just wanna have fun. One "anarachist" spoke with a news reporter and rambled about the Bush family being Nazis. Do we get to invoke Godwin's Law on these wanna-be anarchists? :-)

  91. WTO??????? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck WTO, only EU and US benefit from it will India sell things to US? no so you see what's this all about

    1. Re:WTO??????? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck india

    2. Re:WTO??????? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, we buy tons of stuff from our slave-labor sources (such as india). Just today I bought a $105 jacket which I'm sure some 13 year old dilegently sewed together in horrific working conditions for about 15 rupees. After all, the WTO is about pacifying the slaves (the slave leaders that is).

    3. Re:WTO??????? by gaijin_yutz · · Score: 1

      Even though it does not come from the WTO directly, free trade has really benefitted India in a big way. There are now lots of Indians working outside of their country in high paying tech jobs. A fair chunk of that money goes home and you can bet it helps to improve the standards of living of those who recieve it. Maybe you didn't know that almost the entire tech staff of JP Morgan's Tokyo office is Indian. The free movement of labor has alot to do with free trade.

  92. Re:Wanna-be anarchists roaming the Seattle streets by MAXOMENOS · · Score: 2
    There are about 30 "anarchists", dressed in black hooded sweatshirts and hiding behind gasmasks, smashing store windows (such as GAP and Starbacks) and spraypainting police cars and news cameras! They don't seem to have a cause or message; they just wanna have fun. One "anarachist" spoke with a news reporter and rambled about the Bush family being Nazis. Do we get to invoke Godwin's Law on these wanna-be anarchists? :-)

    I think at this point the police should start sending SWAT to arrest the anarchists. If they complain, the cops can just tell them "We arrested you because we felt like it." No self-respecting anarchist can complain about that...


    The Kulturwehrmacht
  93. The Usefulness of the Whole Web? by Bernal+KC · · Score: 1
    Huh? Are you suggesting that this distributed DOS 'protest' will cause some sort of net traffic jam that will have some second order effect on your web use? 'Duh, I doubt it' sez me. So far it appears the WTO servers are keeping up with the load.

    Attempting to bring the WTO site(s) to its knees is pretty damn close to the effect of a sit-in. That 'place' becomes inaccessible and unable to carry on normal functions. The critical difference to my eye is that surfers who happen upon the scene are unable to tell why the site is inaccessible. (Besides millions of page views will be served successfully in any case.) The surfing public will only be aware of the protest if it gains media air time, or if the WTO decides to explain service problems.

    Another propaganda difference is that coordinating the protest will be even more difficult than is the case with a physical sit-in. At least with a sit-in protesters can be addressed directly and the general demeanor of the protesters can be observed and coached. And if the protesters are faced with police action, they can see it and act accordingly. In this case police action is exceedingly unlikely (against the electro-hippies at least) but if it were to occur the protest leaders might not be aware of it and they'd have a hard time reliably sharing the news with the protesters.

    At least the danger of this protest devolving into violence is almost nil. Unlike the other protests on the streets of Seattle.

  94. 3rd World Behavior by socratic+method · · Score: 1

    I'm not the kind to side with the WTO on their policies, but I am astonished that something like this would happen in America. These protesters need to remember that they are guaranteed the right to PEACEFUL assembly, JUST AS THE DELEGATES TO THE WTO ARE. There are better ways to go about making reforms than restricting the rights of others.

    Pepper spray 'em all. Respect the rights of others or yours will be taken away.

    Scorat.Meth.

    1. Re:3rd World Behavior by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      /rant on

      You know, before you talk about violent demonstrators you should try experiencing an event like that first. I've been to a few and in most cases it was the cops that got violent, not the protestors. Cops don't like hippies any better than one of the GenX bigots so well represented here on Slashdot today. But of course once violence starts, the demonstration is violent and illegal, and ok to repress, which is why they do it, even to using undercover FBI to start rock throwing.

      If you buy into the one God, freedom and justice for all line, there's not much you're going to be able to understand about this event. Try taking a good long look at the history surrounding the Chicago police riots and following conspiracy trial and you might get a glimmer. The reality is that money talks and democracy in this country is a sideshow, allowed as and when it doesn't interfere with more important things like national security, free trade, and corporate interests. Read the declaration of independence again and think about the word "inalienable." The government doesn't grant the right of assembly, it is prohibited from restricting it when peaceful. This includes provoking trouble.

      Money and business are far from evil, they are necessary tools of life. It's only when they become their own rationale for existence, and the sole measure of value that their power distorts the political structure of our once democratic nation. The threat of a police state comes not from our government directly, but from those who could profit from that control, and who would be immune to it.

      Environmental legislation? Fine - as long as no one loses profits. Health and life aren't bottom line items in the corporate budget unless employees are affected. Privacy legislation? Sorry - not now, we need the data to make more money from ecommerce.

      Time after time the individual's quality of life is sacrificed so that businesses can accumulate more wealth and power. These business profits benefit a few at the top greatly and everyone employed to some degree. But they are directed by the value at the top, and if that means laying off half the employees, so be it.

      So are businesses organizations that allow individuals to cooperate to mutual benefit, to society's gain, or are they a means for a few to exploit many while harming society? They can be either, but we're letting them become the latter increasingly. Protesting at the WTO is a decent start.

      /rant off

  95. Why I have no choice but to support the eBeatniks! by Rotten168 · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry but I do. I'm not at all against free trade, but how is doing business with China (slave labor) free trade? And I'm sick of how politicians spout nothing but "business, business, business". How dare we do business with countries like Indonesia, China, or Turkey. Hey I'm a libertarian, but selling away our respect for human life is absolutely unacceptable, and by engaging in trade of any form with governments like these, that proves that we have no other God than money. I just can't do it. I support them, if nothing else they're refusing to go along with what corporate america is telling them to do.

    You just gotta draw the line somewhere.

  96. ElectroDippie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your collective temper tantrum succeeded, the WTO is no match against your wits.

  97. FIRST POST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! by timecop · · Score: 1

    FIRST POST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  98. Seattle mayor declares downtown curfew. by cpeterso · · Score: 2

    This could very well happen now. The Seattle mayor has declared a city-wide state of emergency. The police will enforce a downtown curfew starting at 7:00pm tonight. In case any of you live in Seattle, the curfew area extends from Yesler up to Denny and from I-5 down to the waterfront.

    1. Re:Seattle mayor declares downtown curfew. by quist · · Score: 1

      Looks like most folks are clearing out of that area...
      WSDOT Puget Sound Area Traffic Cameras

      If I knew Seattle better I could understand what I saw!

  99. What drugs are these moderators on???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Flamebait??????? How ridiculous!!!!!!

  100. State troopers and national guard head to Seattle. by cpeterso · · Score: 2

    According to local news, 300 armed state troopers will join Seattle's 1,300 police to enforce the curfew. 200 unarmed national guard will arrive at dawn to help police control crowds tomorrow.

  101. Wealth is a panacea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It worked here, why ont over there? Once they have $, everything else will fall in place. That is the ideal this coutnry is built on after all, and it did seem to work (for the most part). Don't forget, we had child labor and horrificaly terrible working conditions too not so long ago (early 1900's). Once those countries can shift out of that phase, the other things should work themselves out. Of course don't expect for it to take only a year.

  102. Sounds like a great party... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...wish I could attend. We haven't really had a good large protest like this one in a while. And who would have imagined it would have been over human rights and the environment? (I would have thought this only could only come from animal rights, but whatever). Waiting patiently for the riots to begin.

  103. Police fire on crowd? by MAXOMENOS · · Score: 2

    There's reports coming out of the Seattle Independent Media Center that police have fired upon a fleeing crowd of protesters. A lot of the story is probably BS, but what this does indicate is that tensions are rising in Seattle. Joy.


    The Kulturwehrmacht
  104. pray we don't get fooled again... by Seenhere · · Score: 1
    Let's see.
    • Thinks parents are "lusers on both sides": check.
    • Listens to Frank Zappa, but doesn't think he's talking about US: check.
    • Wants uncompromising change: check.
    • Idealistically thinks writing software (or acting locally, thinking globally -- or whatever) will actually do this: check.
    Sounds like the 60's to me, and I just want to say: I think that's great.

    --Seen

    --
    "I used to be a dilettante. Then I thought I'd try something else for a while."
  105. FIRE IN THE STREETS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    FIRE IN THE FSCKING STREETS,MAN!!!!!!

    Who was it that said it's all bullshit?

    Power to the people, right on!

  106. Downtown has been cleared, but crowds stay put. by cpeterso · · Score: 2

    The police have successfully secured downtown Seattle. Unfortunately, the violent crowd of "several hundred" people have not dispersed, they have simply moved. The unruly crowd is now moving into Capitol Hill, a densely populated neighborhood. Unfortunately, I live in Capitol Hill! I am actually kinda scared tongith.. The crowd doesn't look like they are going to leave anytime soon.

    :-(

  107. OPEN THE SLASHDOT SOURCE CODE!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WE WANT THE CURRENT VERSION OF THE SLASHDOT SOURCE CODE!!!

    --- Just focus on scrapping Windows, 'kay?

  108. Re:The problem with hippies and the problem with t by BiLlCaT · · Score: 1



    i must state that you are a freaking idiot linux zealot! knock it off already! christ! does every fucking thing on earth have to do with that stupid-ass penguin? get a fucking life already.


    please... moderate this into oblivion, but i just had to get that off my chest. anti-hippie, pro-linux rhetoric on the subject of the evils of the WTO and someone who is at least trying to protest (you can't protest the evils of the WTO by writing software for the penguin... sorry) has no place in my tolerance today. there are certain things that go beyond the computer industry, my friends. you might want to go out there and experience some of them. ug...

    l8r.

    --bc


    ------------------------------------------
    the amazing bc
    latin/funk flugelhorn & trumpet
    webnaut, music junkie, sysadmin from hell

    --
    the amazing bc
    just another guy doing IT
    webnaut, music junkie, holes-in-head
  109. a rash of copy-cat sit-ins by ironhorse · · Score: 1

    I hope other electro-activists don't start copying the electro-hippes (what a goofy name. at least it isn't e-hippies). Next week the electro-moral majority will be announcing electro-sit-ins for their least favorite porn sites (I'll bet they hate gay, inter-racial pron the most). Remember the anti-scientology site that was shut down? Maybe its creator will return the favor to L Ron Hubbard (Elron? who cares) by spreading the word about an electrono-sit-in at dianetics.com or whatever they call it. Maybe internet explorer 6.0 will have an automatic netscape sit-in function that is turned on buy defualt( but is easy to turn off). It's not funny. the electronico- sit-in or whatever the hell the ex-hippies call it is akin to book burning. I'm curious to know what the law is in this situation.

  110. My God, this is war by samantha · · Score: 1

    This electro-hippy action is nothing more or less than a form of cyber-warfare against some group whose ideas and/or actions do not appeal to you. Is anyone thinking far enough ahead to realize that groups you heavily favor can also be subject to such attacks? Do we really want the net clogged with harrassing traffic every time some group disagrees with another and has a few machine cycles available for virtually attacking their machines? Do we really think creating denial-of-service attacks through overloading web servers does anything good for anybody?

    Count me out. This sucks big time and leads to web anarchy at best and serious backlash at worse.

  111. Didn't say _that_ by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 2
    Hey, I didn't once say I supported the WTO. In my opinion it is a freaking nightmare, and the most likely outcome is to solidify global power in corporate hands, substantially bolstering it until these corporations are directly comparable to governments.

    That said, just where do you get off suggesting that _protest_ is going to change this? (I'm not even going to get into 'suggesting that looting Starbucks is going to change this')

    I would suggest, in all seriousness, that protest, already meaningless except in a (dangerously open to misinterpretation) publicity sense when used against governments, is totally useless against corporations. Corporations can replace ALL the beef in your supermarket with genetically enhanced hormone pumped beef, by economic leverage. Corporations can make things like this happen and you can't complain to an elected representative as there isn't one, and you can't complain to the corporation even if they are sympathetic because they do not have, shall we say, lots of legal support for going against the interests of the stockholders- I question if the stockholders can even get together and say 'do X, which will cost an extra 2%' and have it override the corporation's obligation to go after that 2%.

    So protest becomes irrelevant. I would suggest that you'd better learn to fight, instead. I don't know exactly how this would be done: I don't claim to have all the answers. Possibly IT fighting, cyber-attacking a corporation, would hurt it. Very likely continued physical attacks on the corporate executives would make it difficult for the corporation to conduct its business, though you cannot hurt the corporate entity itself, and anyhow corporations can and do hire bodyguards, chauffeurs who are taught anti-hijacking by Bob Bondurant etc. so a corporate exec is a _tough_ target, as tough as any government official. Finally, the corporation is a creature of law so it can be attacked by law- maybe. The trick is, they are increasingly calling all the shots in the legal sphere- we wouldn't want to have to overthrow the fscking _government_ just to get control of the legal system back. All in all, it's a very nasty puzzle.

    I do acknowledge the dangers of the WTO, against which all these groups from Greenpeace to loggers to environmentalists are aligning. I think maybe I consider it more dangerous than you do... but I doubt it is remotely helpful to have sit-ins, or seize Seattle by a _mob_ (a militia, maybe, but a mob??) or to loot Starbucks.

    1. Re:Didn't say _that_ by BiLlCaT · · Score: 1

      i appreciate your reply and i think it shows you to be a must more thoughtful person than your previous post. i apologize for being so abrasive about it, but i think people on ./ put too much into open source/linux and fail to realize that there are other things in the world.

      i see your point about protesting, but in a lot of instances, it is the only reaction. the wto is an organisation that the US chose to join (and actually help found), by legislative vote. this is where the line between corporation and government begins to get smeared. in the US, corporations do drive the political system. i think you're kidding yourself if you think otherwise. people will get sick of it and some day, when all right criteria are met, people will revolt. but, i think that time is a long way off and another argument entirely.

      on that note, protest is our best methodology, but i don't agree with some of the protesters who have taken to looting and violence. this is not the way to raise awareness for your cause. civilised, peaceful protest with the proper media outlets ensures that you are not just protrayed as some leftist radical wackos out for a little joyride.

      if one raises awareness for the cause at hand (in this case about what the WTO means to the world's economic and possibly environmental well-being), and the general public is upset about it and start swaying their collective vote towards candidates that don't support the WTO, action will be taken to gain the public opinion back. the us gov may not have much power in the wto, but there are under-the-table politics that exist in any political arena that give them some more lean on what happens there. the scary part is that the wto can nullify any law that it sees as a bear to "competition" among it's member countries. this is where we can petition our government to say "no". protest is a way can achieve this as well.

      moral of the story is, the masses are more powerful than the corporations purely because the members of those corporations only have one vote when it comes to election day. controlling public opinion is where it's at, and raising awareness through protest is one way of swaying public opinion, bearing in mind, again, that i am not condoning looting and violence as part of those protest plans (of course the police sometimes cause more of that than the protesters).

      anyway... sorry again for my angry post, and i appreciate your reply.

      l8r.

      --bc
      ------------------------------------------
      the amazing bc
      latin/funk flugelhorn & trumpet
      webnaut, music junkie, sysadmin from hell

      --
      the amazing bc
      just another guy doing IT
      webnaut, music junkie, holes-in-head
  112. It is protest, not DoS by gbnewby · · Score: 1
    The analogy is to a protest march. One person marching on, say, Washington DC is not a big deal. Thousands and thousands of people are a big deal.

    One person running the Electrohippy javascript is not creating a DoS. Thousands together are, in a new electronic form of protest.

    People, the transferrence of activist activities to the electronic sphere is something we should be happy about. After sending email to president@whitehouse.gov and feeling like it didn't really matter, it's good to see some opportunities for collective action.

  113. Now who's dumb? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    If you would have taken the 10 seconds to actually read the whole thing, you would have noticed that they have a page loading up the WTO page in frames and refreshing them every few seconds; their call to action wasn't just to load the WTO page once and leave it open.

    Get your facts straight before you rant.

    ScrO

  114. sad by esperandus · · Score: 1
    violence and anger-a sea of rasised fists-can never succeed in a battle against tyranny...they only erect new manifestataions of it and replace the instituions that propagate it with newer, subtler ones.

    The history of all violent revolutions tells us this unambiguously. Lenin worked in a hospital for orphans for 2 years...but he got angry. It was all downhill fom there. God only knows how the hell well ever be able to change stuff without the energy and visibility of anger...one o fthe tragedies of human history is that almost all revolutionary sentiment has been enslaved by the hatred, anger, and violence it rose up against.

    to quote John Lennon "All we need is love..."

    --
    The truth is out there - we'll let it back in after it sobers up a bit. -The Cube