Slashdot Mirror


User: meglon

meglon's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
1,931
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 1,931

  1. Re: I'm pretty sure he believes in God now... alas on Stephen Hawking Warns That AI and 'Superhumans' Could Wipe Humanity; Says There's No God in Posthumous Book (cnn.com) · · Score: 1

    Science doesn't have to disprove God... once you claim one exists, the onus is on you prove it. As there has NEVER, EVER, been a single solitary piece of evidence EVER of any gods existence.... people who have believed in the delusion of a god have done a fantastically miserable job of even beginning to scratch the surface of proving him/her/it.

    Lets be very clear... i could say that i believe the universe was created by a 6 foot tall invisible rabbit taking a shit... and my explanation of the universes creation is as likely as ANY religion that's ever broached the subject. I have certainly provided as much evidence as any of the others.

  2. Re: I'm pretty sure he believes in God now... alas on Stephen Hawking Warns That AI and 'Superhumans' Could Wipe Humanity; Says There's No God in Posthumous Book (cnn.com) · · Score: 1

    And this is why religious people are worthless shit stains on humanities knickers. Morality has nothing to do with religion. Good people will do good, bad people will do bad, bad people can justify doing bad through religion. If anything, religion itself is immoral as it allows a person to no longer have to be responsible for their actions.... just look at all these conservative christians in the US that get caught doing something and respond with "well, God forgives me." Bullshit.

  3. Re: I'm pretty sure he believes in God now... alas on Stephen Hawking Warns That AI and 'Superhumans' Could Wipe Humanity; Says There's No God in Posthumous Book (cnn.com) · · Score: 1

    There are no morals handed down from god because he doesn't exist. There's obviously a lot of religious people who are truly worthless shits who need that kind of guidance, but those "morals" were created and written down by men.... men thousands of years dead.

  4. This sounds like you are deciding what you believe based on what it can get you. How does that work? I don't think it does. I think it's just self delusion.

    This is the US evangelicals to a T.

  5. God is a mental illness. That says all that needs be said about the people that believe in him: they are mentally ill.

  6. Re: I'm pretty sure he believes in God now... alas on Stephen Hawking Warns That AI and 'Superhumans' Could Wipe Humanity; Says There's No God in Posthumous Book (cnn.com) · · Score: 0

    Utter and complete bullshit. You have obviously overlooked a single important thing as well: in the 75,000 or so years that the human species has, in one manner or another, sought to pray to/appease/worship any number of supreme beings/stars/moons/things that go bump in the night....not a single SINGLE piece of EVIDENCE that ANY of those beings were anything more than FANTASY and MADE UP BULLSHIT.

    I get it... there are some people who are so weak willed that they can't understand living a life without the yoke of some superior thing hung over their shoulders. Perhaps it's those persons acknowledgment that they're truly horrid people and need some from of guidance to live decently (even if it's made up), or perhaps it's simply they're scared of dying. One thing for certain is...THERE HAS NEVER BEEN A SINGLE PIECE OF EVIDENCE FOR ANY GOD/GODDESS/DIETY, and thinking there is is a sure sign of mental weakness and laziness.

  7. Re:Sources are requisite in science, "Quad Eddie" on 'Hyperalarming' Study Shows Massive Insect Loss (washingtonpost.com) · · Score: 1

    Thankfully you only said it once. No one want's Beetlejuice popping up now days; all he does is run around saying "I'm BATMAN!"

  8. The Nordic model (that "Scandinavia" for you) is a mixed economy, and yes it's doing better than the US. THEY haven't crashed the worlds economy in quite along time... unlike one of those on your list. Most of the EU is also more towards the socialist side compared to the capitalist sociopaths here in the US. But then, that's the point.... THAT is what most people in the US on the left are looking towards, not the straw man bullshit you fucks always bring up with Venezuela and whatever other country is failing AT THIS MOMENT. I get it though, most conservatives are pretty stupid, and can't seem to learn that basic fact no matter how many times it's explained to them.

    However, suggesting socialism requires a dictatorship simply means you're a fucking idiot that's never actually had an understanding of what socialism is. That's another trait of conservatives.... parroting the lies they've been told because they're too stupid to figure out it's lies. Again, i get it. You've been lied to for so long by shitstain conservative politicians that want your vote purely so they can have power, and you're too fucking lazy to use your brain and learn anything. Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life.

    Your "capitalism" is nothing more than you sucking the dick of the rich people while hoping they allow you to live, you're just too stupid to understand that.

  9. Yeh... capitalism and politics that funnel money to the wealthy had nothing to do with that. That was sarcasm.... i figured i better say so because you're clearly too stupid to understand reality.

  10. Re: Not as advertised on Stephen Hawking's Last Paper Is Now Online (vice.com) · · Score: 0

    And yet, he was vastly smarter than a worthless cunt like you.

  11. Re:Pantene Saves Physics on Stephen Hawking's Last Paper Is Now Online (vice.com) · · Score: 1

    Even Einstein eventually gave up on this "time-space" bullshit, are you smarter than him? I don't think so.

    Every experiment on relativity has shown Einstein to be correct; and the other constant in the universe is you're not smarter than Einstein either, even though you seem to think you are. Because you're too fucking stupid to keep up on 100+ years of science doesn't mean the science isn't there... it just means you're a fucking idiot who should cut your fingers off before you type another message.

    Every time there's a decent science article posted on /. we have to deal with cultist fucking cunts like you.

  12. Re:complete and total waste of time and money... on Scientists Have Laid Out a Plan To Search For Life in the Universe (qz.com) · · Score: 1

    No one gives a fuck that you want to remain stupider than shit. I'm quite sure some of your prioritize for tax money are stupider than fuck to anyone with intelligence.

  13. Re:Rape legalized, thank you Conservatism! on Canadian Music Group Proposes 'Copyright Tax' On Internet Use (torrentfreak.com) · · Score: 1

    You too are a fucking idiot.

  14. Re:Rape legalized, thank you Conservatism! on Canadian Music Group Proposes 'Copyright Tax' On Internet Use (torrentfreak.com) · · Score: 1

    You are a fucking idiot. Stupid fucking idiots like you ARE the problem with this country.

  15. Re:Spittle??? on Can We Test the Speed of Light Using 'Lensing' from Supernovae? (arxiv.org) · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ....and Dr. Andrew Wakefield was an actual doctor, until he started falsifying research results in his bid to con the UK government out of money by selling an "alternative" vaccination drug. I guess when people start caring more about making money than honesty and integrity, shit goes sideways: hence - conman.

    You're sucking the dick of his dogma,while complaining about people preferring reality to bullshit. Grow the fuck up, use that wilted brain you supposedly have in your head, and clean the bullshit out of your eyes.

  16. Re:Spittle??? on Can We Test the Speed of Light Using 'Lensing' from Supernovae? (arxiv.org) · · Score: -1

    What data? Dipshits like him don't have data.... they have pseudo science bullshit that they just keep repeating for really-stupid-gullible-idiots to believe and parrot.

    Telepathic dogs.... a "universal mind." There is no data. BUT,just like other pseudo science peddlers, a lot of his energy is playing the victim card; "oh... the real scientists are mean to me because i'm just trying to make a living being a conman." He doesn't have dick, other than really-stupid-gullible-idiots following him.

  17. Re:Spittle??? on Can We Test the Speed of Light Using 'Lensing' from Supernovae? (arxiv.org) · · Score: 4, Informative

    I can't tell if you're being sarcastic, or if you're really so stupid as to think Sheldrake is anything more than a psuedo science conman.

    https://newrepublic.com/articl...

    He's as much of a conman as those dipshits who spout the electric universe bullshit... which i'm sure we'll be seeing on this thread in no time.

  18. Re:Meanwhile... on Google CEO Will Testify Before US House on Bias Accusations (reuters.com) · · Score: 1
  19. Re:Why does google have to be bias free? on Google CEO Will Testify Before US House on Bias Accusations (reuters.com) · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    Fox is actually pretty fair and balanced by comparison but feel free rave on.

    You are a fucking idiot.

  20. new name on Japan's Two Hopping Rovers Successfully Land On Asteroid Ryugu (space.com) · · Score: 4, Funny

    Given the first photo, the Minerva-II1A rover will now be know as the JJ Abrams rover.

  21. Re:There is actually a molecule that is 100% accur on Scientists Find 'Super-Earth' In Star System From 'Star Trek' (vice.com) · · Score: 1

    Really? Where are these other places we've been looking for chlorophyll? Hell, where are the other places we've actually been to look for any organic molecules? A few spots on Mars... a couple spots on the moon... and where else in this unfathomably large universe? And then, assuming we find organic material, how again are we going to tell what it is? Are we packing a full IR in every probe.... an NMR... mass spec... gas chromo.? Knowing we've found organics is one thing, knowing what a complex organic actually is is another; simple things, sure, but at some point the complexity starts becoming an issue.

    I think you are significantly overestimating the ability of the few probes/rovers we've actually put places to discern complex organics from each other, and vastly overestimating "where we've looked" in comparison to EVERYTHING, or even "just in this solar system;"wehaven't even gotten to the potentially fun moons yet.

  22. Re:There is actually a molecule that is 100% accur on Scientists Find 'Super-Earth' In Star System From 'Star Trek' (vice.com) · · Score: 1

    .... and any kind of life that goes beyond single celled organisms depends directly or indirectly on being able to generate power from photosynthesis.

    No. Just no.

    You also seem to be placing a lot of emphasis on "it's only found here," when "here" is pretty much the only place we've really looked.

  23. and yet.... on Scientists Find 'Super-Earth' In Star System From 'Star Trek' (vice.com) · · Score: 1

    In a wonderful example of truth validating fiction, the star system imagined as the location of Vulcan, Spock’s home world in Star Trek, has a planet orbiting it in real life.

    And yet....Vulcan's copper based blood was....green? I'm thinking this star having a planet is more of an educated guess panning out than any miracle validation.

  24. Re: TRUMP on How Tech Companies Responded To Hurricane Florence (qz.com) · · Score: 0

    That's the beauty of it. He doesn't have to be competent. He just doesn't have to be Hillary Clinton. That alone is all the braindead, anti-American cultists need.

    Fixed that for you. If you think Trump has been a success for the United States, you are very severely fucked in the head.

  25. Re:Summary is wrong, they didn't ban 5g entirely on Some Northern California Cities Are Blocking Deployment of 5G Towers (techcrunch.com) · · Score: 3, Informative
    Your question is wrong.

    ....where the entirety of all life on the planet is fueled directly or indirectly by the suns output

    This is not true.

    There are biomes on this planet that are not beholding to the sun's energy.

    This is true.

    Regardless of which is more or less common (photosynthesis, or chemosynthesis biomes not supported by solar energy), the first statement is still not true; because photosynthesis is far more readily seen and available to us does not make it absolute....which is what the initial comment i was responding to stated.