Slashdot Mirror


User: Pax681

Pax681's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
674
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 674

  1. Re:We can finally explain wherefore Celtic people on Neanderthals "Had Sex" With Modern Man · · Score: 1

    Decimation (Latin: decimatio; decem = "ten") was a form of military discipline used by officers in the Roman Army to punish mutinous or cowardly soldiers. The word decimation is derived from Latin meaning "removal of a tenth."

    so... sorry bud... but the dictionary says that you ain't right

  2. Re:We can finally explain wherefore Celtic people on Neanderthals "Had Sex" With Modern Man · · Score: 1

    nopes, never even heard of venganza.org before

    i have heard about the flying spaghetti monster variously through the years and we're talking from before the intarwebs time here.

    i am a bit insulted that you would consider lumping me in with the barely literate halfwit ass wipes who send that place hate mail.

    in fact i am bewildered that you could class my posts in the same category at all.... mucho oddness

  3. Re:We can finally explain wherefore Celtic people on Neanderthals "Had Sex" With Modern Man · · Score: 1

    wasn't drunk bud, just dog tired , cross eyed and, as previously mentioned suffering an attack of typage craptastica

    and just plain too tired to be arsed to check it fully..lol

  4. Re:We can finally explain wherefore Celtic people on Neanderthals "Had Sex" With Modern Man · · Score: 1

    oops.. that was meant to be "Geordie" .. as in from Newcastle.. sorry about that...

    i seem to have suffered ann attack of typage craptastica at the late hour at which i typed!

  5. Re:We can finally explain wherefore Celtic people on Neanderthals "Had Sex" With Modern Man · · Score: 1

    aaah yer lack o Scots is showing!

    canna would be Grodie... "Cannae" would be Scots ;-) .. Sorry to say but Scotty from star trek got it wrong all those years

  6. Re:We can finally explain wherefore Celtic people on Neanderthals "Had Sex" With Modern Man · · Score: 1

    erm ..as a wee point...

    "Ostrogothi" means "Goths of (or glorified by) the rising sun".[3] This has been interpreted as "gleaming Goths" or "east Goths".

    The name "Visigothi" is an invention of Cassiodorus, who combined "Visi" and "Gothi" and intended to mean "west Goths".
    not forget the Gepid goths too... poor fellows..they never share the limelight!

  7. Re:We can finally explain wherefore Celtic people on Neanderthals "Had Sex" With Modern Man · · Score: 1

    indeed i wasw refering to the ostrogoths.visigoths etc

    those were the cvelts that sacked Rome

    lots of celtic artifacts including the famous Halstaadt plaid have been found Here

    due to their blatant arse kicking nature the goths spread all over the place..lol.

  8. Re:We can finally explain wherefore Celtic people on Neanderthals "Had Sex" With Modern Man · · Score: 1

    well good man. i am very much Scottish and not British either.

    but for you my friend i shall say

    Cymru Rhydd Nawr! ;-)

    and for me Saor Alba!

  9. Re:We can finally explain wherefore Celtic people on Neanderthals "Had Sex" With Modern Man · · Score: 3, Informative

    the Celts were a much more populous and civilized society than their English neighbors, who were still running around the woods and building log stockades whilst the Celts were building beautiful stone castles

    INSIGHTFUL MY ACHING ASS!

    speaking as a Scotsman i find this funny as hell. you see celts were not just Scotland ,Wales and Ireland........... they were pretty much ALL OVER EUROPE. Celts were a culture and not a race... there were Celts all over the place INCLUDING ENGLAND!!!! oh and Germany.. and Switzerland and France or and spain.....remember the OstroGoths?Visigoths?..erm.. celts..... the celts even sacked Rome...... this is where Milan gets it's name from....

    The foundation of Milan is credited to two Celtic peoples, the Bituriges and the Aedui, having as their emblems a ram and a boar

    yeah.. right next door to England isn't it? and as far as a plague.. well oe third of the roman empire was humped by the plague... however you will find that the SCots and Irisg celts by the VERY nature of them being OUTWITH the roman empire..remember the Scots kicked the crap out the Romans on more than one occassion. and the Irish were prtty much unscathed due to no real expiditionary force from the Romans altough thre was some trade(ie slaves) between the Romans and Irish .Decimation whilst having a roman root isn't even the right wird..lol decimation means 1 out of ten killed. it was , for exa,mple when a legion fucked up they got 1 out of every ten men and killed then as a lesson to the rest not to fuck up again. Or if a p[eople rebelled the same would happen to that population locally as a lesson to the rest. 1/3 != 1 out of ten.

    there were walls built to seperate the Scots tribes from Roman britain.. thus the plague very much kinda skipped the Scots and Irish on that occassion.
    i could go on and show you how amazingly wrong you are in yer wee statement but tbh i cannot bothered.

    i mean did you really believe what you said or just enjoy making shit up?

  10. Re:Note on right to freedom of speech on In the UK, a Few Tweets Restore Freedom of Speech · · Score: 1
    you realise that you are wrong... under the terms of the union Scotland's distinct legal system was guaranteed.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scots_law
    have a gander... i guess that makes you a bigger moron... perhaps.. a cock

    There nothing former about Scotland's nationhood or indeed it's legal sovereignty as downing street went to GREAT pains top point out over the Megrahi affair
    so, in summation... how to put this...... yes.. you are a cock....

    as a history student i am MORE than familiar with these documents
    http://www.statutelaw.gov.uk/content.aspx?activeTextDocId=2078400

    http://www.statutelaw.gov.uk/content.aspx?activeTextDocId=1519711

    XVIII. That the Laws concerning Regulation of Trade, Customs and such Excises to which Scotland is by virtue of this Treaty to be lyable be the same in Scotland from and after the Union as in England and that all other Lawes in use within the Kingdom of Scotland do after the Union and notwithstanding thereof remain in the same force as before (except such as are contrary to or inconsistent with this Treaty) but alterable by the Parliament of Great Britain With this difference betwixt the Laws concerning publick Right, Policy and Civil Government and those which concern private Right That the Laws which concern publick Right Policy and Civil Government may be made the same throughout the whole United Kingdom but that no alteration be made in Laws which concern private Right except for evident utility of the subjects within Scotland Click to open XIX. That the Court of Session or Colledge of Justice do after the Union and notwithstanding thereo XIX. That the Court of Session or Colledge of Justice do after the Union and notwithstanding thereof remain in all time coming within Scotland as it is now constituted by the Laws of that Kingdom and with the same Authority and Priviledges as before the Union subject nevertherless to such Regulations for the better Administration of Justice as shall be made by the Parliament of Great Britain And that hereafter none shall be named by Her Majesty or Her Royal Successors to be Ordinary Lords of Session but such who have served in the Colledge of Justice as Advocats or Principal Clerks of Session for the space of five years or as Writers to the Signet for the space of ten years With this provision That no Writer to the Signet be capable to be admitted a Lord of the Session unless he undergo a private and publick Tryal on the Civil Law before the Faculty of Advocats and be found by them qualified for the said Office two years before he be named to be a Lord of the Session yet so as the Qualifications made or to be made for capacitating persons to be named Ordinary Lords of Session may be altered by the Parliament of Great Britain And that the Court of Justiciary do also after the Union and notwithstanding thereof remain in all time coming within Scotland as it is now constituted by the Laws of that Kindom and with the same Authority and Priviledges as before the Union subject nevertherless to such Regulations as shall be made by the Parliament of Great Britain and without prejudice of other Rights of Justiciary . . . F9 And that the Heritable Rights of Admiralty and Vice-Admiralties in Scotland be reserved to the respective Proprietors as Rights of Property subject nevertherless as to the manner of Exercising such Heritable Rights to such Regulations and Alterations as shall be thought proper to be made by the Parliament of Great Britain And that all other Courts now in being within the Kingdom of Scotland do remain but subject to Alterations by the Parliament of Great Britain And that all Inferior Courts within the said Limits do remain subordinate as they are now to the Supream Courts of Justice within the same in all time coming And that no Causes in Scotland be cognoscible by the Courts of Chancery, Queens-Bench, Commo

  11. Re:Massive headline FAIL on In the UK, a Few Tweets Restore Freedom of Speech · · Score: 1
    holy shitarola!

    this would be ENGLISH LAW... in an ENGLISH COURT.

    see my posts above for the facts on the law in these islands.
    in fact i'll help....again...

    JESUS WEPT... there is no UK law! let me quote ...me! might i point out that there is NO SUCH THING AS BRITISH LAW! really.... no such thing..... you have English law, applicable to England and Wales.... and Scots law , applicable to Scotland and then we have Northern Irish Law the most distinct and unique legal system is Scots Law this notion of "British law" is a fallacy folks.... IS JUST ISN'T SO AND THANKFULLY THIS IS THE CASE! British law/UK law..... there isn't any.........Three separate , distinct legal jurisdictions and legislatures of which Scots Laws is the most distinctly unique

  12. Re:Note on right to freedom of speech on In the UK, a Few Tweets Restore Freedom of Speech · · Score: 1
    JESUS WEPT... there is no UK law!

    let me quote ...me!

    might i point out that there is NO SUCH THING AS BRITISH LAW! really.... no such thing..... you have English law, applicable to England and Wales.... and Scots law , applicable to Scotland and then we have Northern Irish Law the most distinct and unique legal system is Scots Law this notion of "British law" is a fallacy folks.... IS JUST ISN'T SO AND THANKFULLY THIS IS THE CASE!

    British law/UK law..... there isn't any.........Three separate , distinct legal jurisdictions and legislatures of which Scots Laws is the most distinctly unique

  13. Re:Stephen Fry on In the UK, a Few Tweets Restore Freedom of Speech · · Score: 1

    might i point out that there is NO SUCH THING AS BRITISH LAW!

    really.... no such thing..... you have English law, applicable to England and Wales.... and Scots law , applicable to Scotland
    and then we have Northern Irish Law
    the most distinct and unique legal system is Scots Law
    this notion of "British law" is a fallacy folks.... IS JUST ISN'T SO AND THANKFULLY THIS IS THE CASE!

  14. Re:the magic ingredient on Why Charles Stross Hates Star Trek · · Score: 1

    What the A-Team taught me was that all it takes to build an impregnable armored vehicle is a few empty 50 gallon drums. We'd have this Afghanistan thing wrapped up tomorrow if they could just ship a bunch of vans, empty 50 gal. drums and a welding torch or two over there.

    50 gallon drums... and Mr. T.

    he ain't getting on no plane fool!

  15. Re:Murdoch is not a technophobe on Rupert Murdoch Says Google Is Stealing His Content · · Score: 2, Informative

    Eddie Shah got that ball rolling with the the union busting.

    he was the first guy to invoke thatchers anti union laws and also he started the modernisation of the fleet street printing.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eddy_Shah

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Today_(UK_newspaper)

  16. Re:Not always a problem on Artist Not Allowed To Stream His Own Music · · Score: 2

    As Edwyn lives in Scotland it would be Scottish law, there is no such thing as British law. English law covers England and Wales

    Scottish law...Scotland

    Northern Ireland also has it's own laws.

    therefore checking under Scottish law would be the thing to do.

  17. Re:Pay For Full Version on Fake Antivirus Overwhelming Scanners · · Score: 2, Insightful

    yups, you get a choice of recovering session or starting a new one

    not even a case of not RTFM but a case of not opening yer anonymous wee eyes!

  18. Re:PR on Scientists Decry "Horrifying" UK Border Test Plan · · Score: 1

    hmmm how eloquently put..i think not

    Scotland is by far better off as a indepedent state

    a recent TV debate hosted by Michael Portillo on the BBC showed that ALL participants of the debate were in NO doubt that Scotland would be definitely financially capable and in good stead to become independent and there had no, repeat NO doubt about it.

    this is more especially so with the new drilling techniques thus extending what can be drilled from the North sea but also the newly tapped reserves off the west coast twinned with the MASSIVE reserves off Rockall.

    Scotland would not suffer at all from cessation from the UK.

  19. Re:PR on Scientists Decry "Horrifying" UK Border Test Plan · · Score: 1
    ok now i am going to teach you a wee lesson with me not only being Scottish but a nationalist.

    do you know the difference between a Scotsman and a Brit of Scottish origin?

    well there are many peope=e in Scotland who would say they are Scottish and not British"

    Brian Taylor(BBC) notes that in recent polls most Scots say they are Scottish NOT British, just check at the bottom of the page.

    now we get to Gordon bloody Brown. there is a man(i use the term loosely) who is more definitely British i that he drapes himself in the union flag, took elocution lessons to lose his accent and appeal more to the English electorate.. he is also quite happy not only to drain ?Scotlad of all it's natural resources for the benefit of Englandbut redraw the maritime borders so that england gets a bigger share of what is rightly Scottish territorial waters(see page 6 entitled - Imposition of the Scottish Adjacent Waters Boundaries Order 1999 here's a wee quote of what the Times had to say

    Documents detailing secret government plans in the 1970s to prevent Scotland laying claim to North Sea oil have been seen by The Times. They show the extraordinary lengths to which civil servants were prepared to go to head off devolution, which was seen then as inevitably leading to independence. The proposals included suggesting to Labour ministers, for whom devolution was a manifesto commitment, that progress towards a referendum should be delayed, in the hope that enthusiasm north of the Border would wane. Treasury officials also advised that the boundaries of Scotland's coastal waters should be redrawn and a new sector created to âoeneutraliseâ Scotland's claim to North Sea oil â" a step that was taken

    these sectors are "hidden as "extra regio territories"

    maybe something to do with stealing claim to the largest oil/gas reserves in the EU perhaps?

    people like Brown do NOT have Scotland's best interests at heart, only expanding their own power base to the detriment of Scotland. he is a Brit and only happens to be of Scots origin.

  20. Re:1984 on Scientists Decry "Horrifying" UK Border Test Plan · · Score: 1

    you sound like one of those morons from the BNP

    now i am a Scottish Nationalist but we are very different from your type of knuckle dragging xenophobic crapioca. we just think Scotland should be self governing and race is NOT an issue at all.

    it's nasty cretinous racist muppets like you that should be dragging your knuckles into the 21st century

    it's people like you who make Scottish people like me dislike being tagged as "British" and also dislike the union flag.

    Saor Alba

  21. Re:hehehehe on Aussie Data Centres Brace For Dust Storm Barrage · · Score: 1

    did you even watch the veho linky?

  22. Re:hehehehe on Aussie Data Centres Brace For Dust Storm Barrage · · Score: 1

    i think if you add up all the natural emissions of green house gases then nature kicks human ass at it

  23. Re:hehehehe on Aussie Data Centres Brace For Dust Storm Barrage · · Score: 1

    if you have probs with the veho link then use this google video link that will play the full 54 mins here

  24. Re:hehehehe on Aussie Data Centres Brace For Dust Storm Barrage · · Score: 0

    70 years ago we didn't pollute ANYWHERE as much as we do today.

    actually i think you will find that there was FAR more CO2 output then.

    funnily enough ths is according to Bjorn Lomborg , the chap who wrote the book "the sceptical environmentalist", he also did a video presentation it find someof his videos here, he's very good and cuts through much of the FUD

    Veho link to a critique of the man made global warming theory(and inconvenient truth. the great global warming conspiracy),us congressional testimoney 2007, then here ,then here and then we have his site right here and finally Penn and Teller on environmental hysteria, they have quite the crack research team
    now you sir, are being rude and patronising and also very presumptuous. you have to recognise the FUD and also that there are rather a lot of people making rather a lot of money out of the environmental "movement".

    i would also propose that it is also a fact that human c02 emissions are far less than those from volcanoes and c02 is actually not a major greenhouse gas when compared to the emissions(methane,ethane,propane and butane) from bovine animals, termites, and various other natural sources of greenhouse gases.

    now ,yes, we contribute but only to part of a natural cycle and there IS a natrural cycle.

    Bjorn is not alone in making these statements of fact and is backed by many other people in this field.

    as i said, all i could call you is rude, presumptuous and closed minded

  25. Re:Spread the FUD on Swine Flu Outbreak At PAX · · Score: 1

    you certainly presume a lot

    D company were not given placebos

    B company were given placebos. this was all told to us after the study had taken place.

    your presumption is astonishing, you're arrogance even more so.

    we were neither told what the "drugs" were for or what they effect they were meant to have was.... our concern in the matter was that were got paid a "bounty" of £250GBP and a week of leave to spend it on. the guaranteed carrot for many a soldier..LOL

    i'll tell you what tho, i will take the word of a qualified, experienced(30 years) medical professional over the word of some arrogant, presumptuous /. keyboard warrior such as yourself ANY DAY.

    i would suggest against anyone lending any credence at all to your petulant,arrogant presumptuous self

    i am underwhelmed by you