Still it does mean that in this country McDonalds have a damn good reason to ask you if you're eat in or take away. That reaspon being that if you have a milkshake it's a different price since if you eat in it becomes a restaurant not a food store and tax is charged.
Because if OS-X ran on PCs, it would have every single one of XP's problems within minutes.
Driver issues would cause stability isssues, it would suddenly be more attractive to spyware and virus makers.
Basically it would be windows. Only probably worse because MS have a lot more practice at dealing with those issues which is why XP is by and large, so much better than 9x in these ways.
Apple have not given out multiple complete generations of their media player, movie maker etc for free.
10.4 is not "a completely different OS", it's what 1.0 should have been in the first place, much more so than any shortcomings that were ever present in XP build 2600.
I don't think $100 for an OS that apparently had a 5 year shelf life of free updates (try getting that from apple) is at all bad when people pay more than half that for "LOL Shoot people in the head 199"
Income tax is 23 or 40% for most citizens. I assume by property tax you mean the equivilent of our council tax which would be about another $2-3,000US a year for an average home.
Just a note to point out the Daily Mail is roughly half a step about the National Inquirer in terms of credability, so this one could be entirely fictional.
Slashdot Mirror
Or more likely the other way round.
Damn straight my good man.
Still it does mean that in this country McDonalds have a damn good reason to ask you if you're eat in or take away. That reaspon being that if you have a milkshake it's a different price since if you eat in it becomes a restaurant not a food store and tax is charged.
Yes but since this isn't a legal matter that doesn't matter. It's an acceptable use policy.
It's just a business refusing to serve you. If you feel they've done it unfairly, THEN you can sue THEM.
Neither sugar nor tea has any tax at all. Like most essential foods they're sales-tax exempt.
In the UK, Imagine's "360" is the best one (the one on the left in the link, they own two).
Ebay seem to spend a hell of a lot of money on adwords on google too.
Not that it's really worth it.
No, stole involves the transfer of property, not the cloning of it.
If anything the crime is counterfeiting.
Apple's 2% market share did not cause anyone to make USB peripherals.
Because some of them still care about legality.
They still do, although I believe it's only for users who've spent a certain amount on the service in the past.
His point was you said "Steal", which they are NOT doing.
Because if OS-X ran on PCs, it would have every single one of XP's problems within minutes.
Driver issues would cause stability isssues, it would suddenly be more attractive to spyware and virus makers.
Basically it would be windows. Only probably worse because MS have a lot more practice at dealing with those issues which is why XP is by and large, so much better than 9x in these ways.
I think you've misunderstood the way this works. He's already answered the questions we posted.
You're about a week late.
Much like Teller from Penn and Teller for that matter. In that act he actually speaks quite a bit, but only when he's off screen, or behind something.
He also talked when they were on the Simpsons, allowable for the same reason.
If you're an independant on itunes yes.
If you're with EMI/Parlaphone etc on itunes? Not so much.
No, just British and American con artists :)
By that definition, Microsoft is not a monopoly either.
Apple have not given out multiple complete generations of their media player, movie maker etc for free.
10.4 is not "a completely different OS", it's what 1.0 should have been in the first place, much more so than any shortcomings that were ever present in XP build 2600.
Ah, the "XP didn't work properly thing".
I was referring to the upgrades to Media Player, to Movie maker, to messenger, to anti-spyware.
All of which were free from MS and the equivilents, when they even existed, charged for by Apple.
My point is you can't blame Sony for the VAT rate, it's only fair to compare pre-tax prices.
Tomb Raider was £29.99 on play.com for 6 whole months before release.
And your plan is all very well if you have the money to drop on a games PC.
I don't think $100 for an OS that apparently had a 5 year shelf life of free updates (try getting that from apple) is at all bad when people pay more than half that for "LOL Shoot people in the head 199"
Yes to both.
Income tax is 23 or 40% for most citizens. I assume by property tax you mean the equivilent of our council tax which would be about another $2-3,000US a year for an average home.
Just a note to point out the Daily Mail is roughly half a step about the National Inquirer in terms of credability, so this one could be entirely fictional.
Unless Star Wars is a "niche series" because I'm willing to bet the last SW film didn't do $125mil of business on launch day.