| That is absolutely and totally obscene. You are a horrible person. To advocate taking all the money from NASA and using it to STARVE children is insane. I hope you die.
This is absolute genius. I wish I had mod points....
I have a LAN side caching DNS which also serves the "in house computer names".
The only router that I've been able to configure with a LAN side DNS address (192.168.200.9 in this case) for DHCP is a Linksys.
Has anyone had any success configuring any of these routers with a LAN side DNS for DHCP configuration?
So the solution is not to buy any Microsoft products. Then at least you'll be protected from Microsoft ever claiming anything against you. I wouldn't buy anything from any company if there was any danger of buying illegal stuff. So Compusa is out, Fry's is out, Newegg is out as far as Microsoft products go.
Re:"Essentially" the same data?
on
OpenOffice Bloated?
·
· Score: 2, Insightful
Even then , would you rather spend $500 on Microsoft Office or extra memory and a CPU to get a better machine to speed up all the applications. Paying for one piece of software usually does not pay.
You haven't said if this is your computer or the users computer.And also have not indicated if it is a one button mouse, or two or three.
If your computer, if you are using firefox, opera, mozilla, konqueror or lynx or safari.
You also have not indicated if middle button is set for tab, and the right button is set for new window for three button mouse, or what the mouse button setting is for a two button mouse, or what meta keys are used for a one button mouse.
When the supposedly infinging code is made known, then a million hands will be searching for it's origins, and they will go back, way back to see where it might have originated from.
Way back in late 60s and early seventies there were a lot of interchange of ideas/code between academics and industry about operating systems.
Some that come to mind were HP RTE (Real Time Executive),which was developed at University of Montana in exchange for an HP computer.
There was the Scientific Data Systems.
There have been , as a crude estimate, well over 10,000 books written on the subject.
History of the subject is rich and way to complex to research by one company , or a law firm, but it is well within the grasp of a million specialists sitting at a computer, or leafing thru JACM or IEEE publications, and the millions of ancient books they have in their posession.
One ofshoot of this is that those who subscribed to MSDN( as I did) will also search for any source code that resembles the supposedly infringing code.
So at that point Microsoft may have to get into picture and coach SCO as to not to reveal the code, since the outcome for Microsoft may not be pretty.
Al in all this is a good thing for Linux. We can get a lot of milage out of this. A lot more than they hope to get.
I can understand some proprietary software company having a brain-storm session and coming up with a scenario like this to curb the growth of Linux, but this ain't it.
All this has accomplished this far is crystalize the opposition to SCO and Microsoft.
Any companies it actually has helped is Sun and IBM.
It appears that these people still don't understand what open source is about. There IS no air supply to cut off. There IS no funds to dry. If IBM stopped Linux developement today, Linux will still charge on. Now, next year, next decade.
Another problem for Microsoft is that, even if Linux was banned, then all these programmers would develope Office tools, CRM, Games, and all the other lucrative things that MS is trying to capitalize on. Apache has already demonstrated that when OSS can't eat Microsofts lunch at OS, it will eat their lunch on their home turf.
Tp paraphrase, "Linux sticks like #$%^ to Microsofts blanket".
I pay for 2 extra IP's per month from Comcast, and have done so for 6 years now. But not to use them. I do so out of fairness. We are 3 people in the house , and I feel we should pay for 3. However , we do have 14 computers in the house, including 1 caching DNS server. We also use DSL from Qwest which gives me 5 static IPs so that I can run my own servers.
This network is not realizable by using their IPs, because they don't give more than 5 IP addresses. Besides , since we access thru Comcast and Qwest, whose IPs should we use? What about unintentional leakage of Comcast traffic to Qwest and vice versa?
Just curious, why companies like Apollo with Mentor Graphics s/w is never mentioned in these discussions. I remember attending Mentor Graphics training classes ( Apr. 1984?) with a flow blown windowing system, touch pad (fingernail?) mouse.
Slashdot Mirror
| That is absolutely and totally obscene. You are a horrible person. To advocate taking all the money from NASA and using it to STARVE children is insane. I hope you die.
This is absolute genius. I wish I had mod points....
Unless it is "Anticipatory Retaliation"...
Probably McCoy gave them a visit.
Are they meteor tracks??? http://maps.google.com/?ie=UTF8&ll=56.453385,-7.750854&spn=1.141412,3.702393&t=h&z=8&om=1/
Actually Sun bought out their license from Novell in 1994
9 4_March_24/ai_15082383/
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0NEW/is_19
He said the Zune had a 10.2 percent market share in the U.S. in the 30 gigabyte category
"If you can't make the numerator rarger, make the denominator smarrer."
-- Guy Kawasaki - The Computer Curmudgeon
I have a LAN side caching DNS which also serves the "in house computer names".
The only router that I've been able to configure with a LAN side DNS address (192.168.200.9 in this case) for DHCP is a Linksys.
Has anyone had any success configuring any of these routers with a LAN side DNS for DHCP configuration?
Thanx
So the solution is not to buy any Microsoft products. Then at least you'll be protected from Microsoft ever claiming anything against you. I wouldn't buy anything from any company if there was any danger of buying illegal stuff. So Compusa is out, Fry's is out, Newegg is out as far as Microsoft products go.
Just say no to Microsoft.
No. It is not my job to police Microsoft's marketing force, and it is wrong for me to be impacted by their marketing force's incompetence.
This would never happen with my copy of SUSE 10.1, or OpenOffice.
Sorry , here it is again...
http://www.airsafe.com/events/models/rate_mod.htm
This site gives pretty good statistics..
http://www.airsafe.com/events/models/rate_mod.htm
Even then , would you rather spend $500 on Microsoft Office or extra memory and a CPU to get a better machine to speed up all the applications. Paying for one piece of software usually does not pay.
And unless James can get it back, The world will be a much hotter place.
>>They're in it for power.
Nope. Apparently they're in it for Pentium...
Dual Pentium 4 ? Who makes such a mobo ???
You haven't said if this is your computer or the users computer.And also have not indicated if it is a one button mouse, or two or three.
....
If your computer, if you are using firefox, opera, mozilla, konqueror or lynx or safari.
You also have not indicated if middle button is set for tab, and the right button is set for new window for three button mouse, or what the mouse button setting is for a two button mouse, or what meta keys are used for a one button mouse.
Or is this lynx browser
Sorry not enough info...
Also known as "Signetics WOM" WOM
>
To Quote Arlo Guthrie:
"We must not negotiate with terrorists at any level!"
Actually Bill Gates used to own almost 50% as AFAIR. Now he holds about 11% ...
Which means he has gotten rid of almost 80% of his holdings.
Yahoo -> MSFT -> insider , looking at last year show an almost scary mass exodus...
Could come from a lot of places.
,which was developed at University of Montana in exchange for an HP computer.
When the supposedly infinging code is made known, then a million hands will be searching for it's origins, and they will go back, way back to see where it might have originated from.
Way back in late 60s and early seventies there were a lot of interchange of ideas/code between academics and industry about operating systems.
Some that come to mind were HP RTE (Real Time Executive)
There was the Scientific Data Systems.
There have been , as a crude estimate, well over 10,000 books written on the subject.
History of the subject is rich and way to complex to research by one company , or a law firm, but it is well within the grasp of a million specialists sitting at a computer, or leafing thru JACM or IEEE publications, and the millions of ancient books they have in their posession.
One ofshoot of this is that those who subscribed to MSDN( as I did) will also search for any source code that resembles the supposedly infringing code.
So at that point Microsoft may have to get into picture and coach SCO as to not to reveal the code, since the outcome for Microsoft may not be pretty.
Al in all this is a good thing for Linux. We can get a lot of milage out of this. A lot more than they hope to get.
I can understand some proprietary software company having a brain-storm session and coming up with a scenario like this to curb the growth of Linux, but this ain't it.
All this has accomplished this far is crystalize the opposition to SCO and Microsoft.
Any companies it actually has helped is Sun and IBM.
It appears that these people still don't understand what open source is about. There IS no air supply to cut off. There IS no funds to dry. If IBM stopped Linux developement today, Linux will still charge on. Now, next year, next decade.
Another problem for Microsoft is that, even if Linux was banned, then all these programmers would develope Office tools, CRM, Games, and all the other lucrative things that MS is trying to capitalize on. Apache has already demonstrated that when OSS can't eat Microsofts lunch at OS, it will eat their lunch on their home turf.
Tp paraphrase, "Linux sticks like #$%^ to Microsofts blanket".
I pay for 2 extra IP's per month from Comcast, and have done so for 6 years now. But not to use them. I do so out of fairness. We are 3 people in the house , and I feel we should pay for 3. However , we do have 14 computers in the house, including 1 caching DNS server. We also use DSL from Qwest which gives me 5 static IPs so that I can run my own servers.
This network is not realizable by using their IPs, because they don't give more than 5 IP addresses. Besides , since we access thru Comcast and Qwest, whose IPs should we use? What about unintentional leakage of Comcast traffic to Qwest and vice versa?
Just curious, why companies like Apollo with Mentor Graphics s/w is never mentioned in these discussions. I remember attending Mentor Graphics training classes ( Apr. 1984?) with a flow blown windowing system, touch pad (fingernail?) mouse.
sinan
I like your user name. Do they still make those?
sinan
10^64 ? I thought ARthur Eddington's estimate was around 10^80. Are there finer estimates now?
Thanx...
I thought that was called prior restraint and was illegal in this country...
sinan